Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ ($-0.96 < y_{\rm cms} < 0.04$) and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 0.3~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp (p-Pb) collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$ ($\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02~{\rm TeV}$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ ($-0.96 < y_{\rm cms} < 0.04$) and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 0.3~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp (p-Pb) collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$ ($\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02~{\rm TeV}$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $3 < p_{\rm T} < 5~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$.

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ ($-0.96 < y_{\rm cms} < 0.04$) and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp (p-Pb) collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$ ($\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02~{\rm TeV}$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ ($-0.96 < y_{\rm cms} < 0.04$) and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp (p-Pb) collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$ ($\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02~{\rm TeV}$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $3 < p_{\rm T} < 5~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$.

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ ($-0.96 < y_{\rm cms} < 0.04$) and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp (p-Pb) collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$ ($\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02~{\rm TeV}$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ ($-0.96 < y_{\rm cms} < 0.04$) and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp (p-Pb) collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$ ($\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02~{\rm TeV}$).

Comparison of the azimuthal-correlation distributions of D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8$ GeV/$c$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 0.3$ GeV/$c$, in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV. Rapidity range for the D mesons are $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ in pp, $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$ in p-Pb. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$. The azimuthal-correlation distributions are reported in the range $0 < \Delta\varphi < \pi$.

Comparison of the azimuthal-correlation distributions of D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16$ GeV/$c$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 0.3$ GeV/$c$, in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV. Rapidity range for the D mesons are $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ in pp, $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$ in p-Pb. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$. The azimuthal-correlation distributions are reported in the range $0 < \Delta\varphi < \pi$.

Comparison of the azimuthal-correlation distributions of D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8$ GeV/$c$ and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1$ GeV/$c$, in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV. Rapidity range for the D mesons are $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ in pp, $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$ in p-Pb. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$. The azimuthal-correlation distributions are reported in the range $0 < \Delta\varphi < \pi$.

Comparison of the azimuthal-correlation distributions of D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16$ GeV/$c$ and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1$ GeV/$c$, in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV. Rapidity range for the D mesons are $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ in pp, $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$ in p-Pb. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$. The azimuthal-correlation distributions are reported in the range $0 < \Delta\varphi < \pi$.

Comparison of the azimuthal-correlation distributions of D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8$ GeV/$c$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1$ GeV/$c$, in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV. Rapidity range for the D mesons are $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ in pp, $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$ in p-Pb. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$. The azimuthal-correlation distributions are reported in the range $0 < \Delta\varphi < \pi$.

Comparison of the azimuthal-correlation distributions of D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16$ GeV/$c$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1$ GeV/$c$, in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV. Rapidity range for the D mesons are $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ in pp, $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$ in p-Pb. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$. The azimuthal-correlation distributions are reported in the range $0 < \Delta\varphi < \pi$.

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $3 < p_{\rm T} < 5~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 0.3~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 0.3~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 0.3~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $3 < p_{\rm T} < 5~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $3 < p_{\rm T} < 5~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Near-side-peak associated yield values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 0.3$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak associated yield values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak associated yield values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak width values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 0.3$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak width values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak width values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Baseline values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 0.3$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Baseline values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Baseline values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak associated yield values measured in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 0.3$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak associated yield values measured in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak associated yield values measured in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak width values measured in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 0.3$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak width values measured in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak width values measured in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta| =|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}|< 1$.

p-T differential invariant yield of Lambda + anti-Lambda in pp collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 7 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of Xi+ + Xi- in pp collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 7 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of Xi+ + Xi- in pp collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 7 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of K0s in pPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of K0s in pPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of Lambda + anti-Lambda in pPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of Lambda + anti-Lambda in pPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of Xi+ + Xi- in pPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of Xi+ + Xi- in pPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of K0s in PbPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 2.76 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of K0s in PbPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 2.76 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of Lambda + anti-Lambda in PbPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 2.76 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of Lambda + anti-Lambda in PbPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 2.76 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of Xi+ + Xi- in PbPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 2.76 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of Xi+ + Xi- in PbPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 2.76 TeV.

pT-dependent Lambda+anti-Lambda to K0S production ratios in pp collisions with centre-of-mass energy = 7 TeV.

pT-dependent Lambda+anti-Lambda to K0S production ratios in pPb collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

pT-dependent Lambda+anti-Lambda to K0S production ratios in PbPb collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon = 2.76 TeV.

pT-dependent Xi+ + Xi- to Lambda+anti-Lambda production ratios in pp collisions with centre-of-mass energy = 7 TeV.

pT-dependent Xi+ + Xi- to Lambda+anti-Lambda production ratios in pPb collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

pT-dependent Xi+ + Xi- to Lambda+anti-Lambda production ratios in PbPb collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon = 2.76 TeV.

Simultenous blast-wave fits parameters in pp collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 7 TeV.

Simultenous blast-wave fits parameters in pPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

Simultenous blast-wave fits parameters in PbPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 2.76 TeV.

Mean transverse kinetic energy MEAN(KE_T) of K0s in pp collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon=7 TeV.

Mean transverse kinetic energy MEAN(KE_T) of Lambda+anti-Lambda in pp collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon=7 TeV.

Mean transverse kinetic energy MEAN(KE_T) of K0s in pPb collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon=5.02 TeV.

Mean transverse kinetic energy MEAN(KE_T) of Lambda+anti-Lambda in pPb collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon=5.02 TeV.

Mean transverse kinetic energy MEAN(KE_T) of Xi+ + Xi- in pPb collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon=5.02 TeV.

Mean transverse kinetic energy MEAN(KE_T) of K0s in PbPb collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon=2.76 TeV.

Mean transverse kinetic energy MEAN(KE_T) of Lambda + anti-Lambda in PbPb collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon=2.76 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of K0s in pPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of Lambda + anti-Lambda in pPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of K0s in pPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of Lambda + anti-Lambda in pPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of K0s in pPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

p-T differential invariant yield of Lambda + anti-Lambda in pPb collisions with center-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

pT-dependent Lambda+Anti-Lambda to K0S production ratios in pPb collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon = 5.02 TeV.

Mean transverse kinetic energy MEAN(KE_T) of K0s in pPb collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon=5.02 TeV.

Mean transverse kinetic energy MEAN(KE_T) of Lambda + anti-Lambda in pPb collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon=5.02 TeV.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ integrated over rapidity range $-1.8<y*<1.3$ for the 0--90% centrality interval for the three geometric models: (a) Glauber, (b) Glauber-Gribov with $\omega_{\sigma}=0.11$ and (c) Glauber-Gribov with $\omega_{\sigma}=0.2$.

$R_{pPb}$ values as a function of $p_{T}$ in the 0--90% centrality interval averaged over $|y*|<0.5$.The $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$ value for the ATLAS centrality correction is calculated with the Glauber model. The total systematic uncertainties, which include the uncertainty in $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$, are indicated by lines of the same colour. Strict quantitative agreement is not expected as each measurement uses different rapidity intervals for the centrality determination and apply different event selection criteria to reject diffractive collisions.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields integrated over $-1.8<y*<1.3$ for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields integrated over $-1.8<y*<1.3$ for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields integrated over $-1.8<y*<1.3$ for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{CP}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields integrated over $|\eta|<2.3$ for seven centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{CP}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields integrated over $|\eta|<2.3$ for seven centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{CP}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields integrated over $|\eta|<2.3$ for seven centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ extracted from the invariant yields for six rapidity ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

$R_{pPb}$ as a function of $y*$ extracted from the invariant yields for eight $p_{T}$ ranges, for eight centrality intervals, and for different geometrical models used to calculate $\langle T_{Pb} \rangle$.

NLO cross sections and selection efficiencies (assuming $\beta$ = 1) for different signal points.

Interpretation of results in the T1tttt model. The colored regions show the upper limits (95\% CL) on the production cross section for $pp\rightarrow \tilde{g}\tilde{g},\tilde{g}\rightarrow t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ in the $m_{\tilde{g}}$-$m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ plane.

Interpretation of results in the T1tttt model. The colored regions show the upper limits (95\% CL) on the production cross section for $pp\rightarrow \tilde{g}\tilde{g},\tilde{g}\rightarrow t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ in the $m_{\tilde{g}}$-$m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ plane. The curve shows the observed limit on the corresponding SUSY particle masses obtained by comparing the excluded cross section with theoretical cross sections.

Interpretation of results in the T1tttt model. The colored regions show the upper limits (95\% CL) on the production cross section for $pp\rightarrow \tilde{g}\tilde{g},\tilde{g}\rightarrow t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ in the $m_{\tilde{g}}$-$m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ plane. The curve shows the observed limit on the corresponding SUSY particle masses obtained by comparing the excluded cross section with $+1\sigma$ theoretical cross sections.

Interpretation of results in the T1tttt model. The colored regions show the upper limits (95\% CL) on the production cross section for $pp\rightarrow \tilde{g}\tilde{g},\tilde{g}\rightarrow t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ in the $m_{\tilde{g}}$-$m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ plane. The curve shows the observed limit on the corresponding SUSY particle masses obtained by comparing the excluded cross section with $-1\sigma$ theoretical cross sections.

Interpretation of results in the T1tttt model. The colored regions show the upper limits (95\% CL) on the production cross section for $pp\rightarrow \tilde{g}\tilde{g},\tilde{g}\rightarrow t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ in the $m_{\tilde{g}}$-$m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ plane. The curve shows the expected limit on the corresponding SUSY particle masses obtained by comparing the excluded cross section with theoretical cross sections.

Interpretation of results in the T1tttt model. The colored regions show the upper limits (95\% CL) on the production cross section for $pp\rightarrow \tilde{g}\tilde{g},\tilde{g}\rightarrow t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ in the $m_{\tilde{g}}$-$m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ plane. The curve shows the expected limit on the corresponding SUSY particle masses corresponding to a $+1\sigma$ variation of the experimental uncertainty.

Interpretation of results in the T1tttt model. The colored regions show the upper limits (95\% CL) on the production cross section for $pp\rightarrow \tilde{g}\tilde{g},\tilde{g}\rightarrow t\bar{t}\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ in the $m_{\tilde{g}}$-$m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ plane. The curve shows the expected limit on the corresponding SUSY particle masses corresponding to a $-1\sigma$ variation of the experimental uncertainty.

Observed excluded region (95\% CL), shown in blue, in the $m_{\tilde{g}}$-$m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ plane for a model combining T5tttt, gluino pair production, followed by gluino decay to an on-shell top squark, together with a model for direct top squark pair production. The top squarks decay via the two-body process $\tilde{t}\rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^0_1$. The neutralino and top squark masses are related by the constraint $m_{\tilde{t}} = m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} + 175$ GeV.

Expected excluded region (95\% CL), shown in blue, in the $m_{\tilde{g}}$-$m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ plane for a model combining T5tttt, gluino pair production, followed by gluino decay to an on-shell top squark, together with a model for direct top squark pair production. The top squarks decay via the two-body process $\tilde{t}\rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^0_1$. The neutralino and top squark masses are related by the constraint $m_{\tilde{t}} = m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} + 175$ GeV.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section for |rapidity| 1.5 TO 2.0 as a function of the jet transverse momentum. Jets are clustered with the anti-kt algorithm ( R = 0.7). The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.7%.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section for |rapidity| 2.0 TO 2.5 as a function of the jet transverse momentum. Jets are clustered with the anti-kt algorithm ( R = 0.7). The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.7%.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section for |rapidity| 2.5 TO 3.0 as a function of the jet transverse momentum. Jets are clustered with the anti-kt algorithm ( R = 0.7). The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.7%.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section for |rapidity| 3.2 TO 4.7 as a function of the jet transverse momentum. Jets are clustered with the anti-kt algorithm ( R = 0.7). The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.7%.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section for |rapidity| < 0.5 as a function of the jet transverse momentum. Jets are clustered with the anti-kt algorithm ( R = 0.4). The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.7%.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section for |rapidity| 0.5 TO 1.0 as a function of the jet transverse momentum. Jets are clustered with the anti-kt algorithm ( R = 0.4). The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.7%.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section for |rapidity| 1.0 TO 1.5 as a function of the jet transverse momentum. Jets are clustered with the anti-kt algorithm ( R = 0.4). The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.7%.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section for |rapidity| 1.5 TO 2.0 as a function of the jet transverse momentum. Jets are clustered with the anti-kt algorithm ( R = 0.4). The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.7%.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section for |rapidity| 2.0 TO 2.5 as a function of the jet transverse momentum. Jets are clustered with the anti-kt algorithm ( R = 0.4). The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.7%.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section for |rapidity| 2.5 TO 3.0 as a function of the jet transverse momentum. Jets are clustered with the anti-kt algorithm ( R = 0.4). The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.7%.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section for |rapidity| 3.2 TO 4.7 as a function of the jet transverse momentum. Jets are clustered with the anti-kt algorithm ( R = 0.4). The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.7%.

The distribution of the missing transverse momentum is shown in soft-lepton 2-jet W+jets control regions after normalising the ttbar and W+jets background processes in the simultaneous fit.

Expected background yields as obtained in the background-only fits in all hard-lepton and soft-lepton validation together with observed data are given. Uncertainties in the fitted background estimates combine statistical (in the simulated event yields) and systematic uncertainties.

Expected background yields as obtained in the background-only fits in all hard-lepton and soft-lepton signal together with observed data are given. Uncertainties in the fitted background estimates combine statistical (in the simulated event yields) and systematic uncertainties.

Distributions of mt for the hard-lepton 4-jet low-x signal region. The requirement on the variable plotted is removed from the definitions of the signal regions, where the arrow indicates the position of the cut in the signal region. The lower panels of the plots show the ratio of the observed data to the total background prediction as derived in the background-only fit. The uncertainty bands plotted include all statistical and systematic uncertainties as discussed in Section 7. The component `Others' is the sum of Z+jets and ttbar+V. The last bin includes the overflow.

Distributions of met/meff for the 4-jet high-x signal region. The requirement on the variable plotted is removed from the definitions of the signal regions, where the arrow indicates the position of the cut in the signal region. The lower panels of the plots show the ratio of the observed data to the total background prediction as derived in the background-only fit. The uncertainty bands plotted include all statistical and systematic uncertainties as discussed in Section 7. The component `Others' is the sum of Z+jets and ttbar+V. The last bin includes the overflow.

Distributions of mt for the hard-lepton 5-jet signal region. The requirement on the variable plotted is removed from the definitions of the signal regions, where the arrow indicates the position of the cut in the signal region. The lower panels of the plots show the ratio of the observed data to the total background prediction as derived in the background-only fit. The uncertainty bands plotted include all statistical and systematic uncertainties as discussed in Section 7. The component `Others' is the sum of Z+jets and ttbar+V. The last bin includes the overflow.

Distributions of mt for the hard-lepton 6-jet signal region. The requirement on the variable plotted is removed from the definitions of the signal regions, where the arrow indicates the position of the cut in the signal region. The lower panels of the plots show the ratio of the observed data to the total background prediction as derived in the background-only fit. The uncertainty bands plotted include all statistical and systematic uncertainties as discussed in Section 7. The component `Others' is the sum of Z+jets and ttbar+V. The last bin includes the overflow.

Distributions of met for the soft-lepton 2-jet signal region. The requirement on the variable plotted is removed from the definitions of the signal regions, where the arrow indicates the position of the cut in the signal region. The lower panels of the plots show the ratio of the observed data to the total background prediction as derived in the background-only fit. The uncertainty bands plotted include all statistical and systematic uncertainties as discussed in Section 7. The component `Others' is the sum of Z+jets and ttbar+V. The last bin includes the overflow.

Distributions of met for the soft-lepton 5-jet signal region. The requirement on the variable plotted is removed from the definitions of the signal regions, where the arrow indicates the position of the cut in the signal region. The lower panels of the plots show the ratio of the observed data to the total background prediction as derived in the background-only fit. The uncertainty bands plotted include all statistical and systematic uncertainties as discussed in Section 7. The component `Others' is the sum of Z+jets and ttbar+V. The last bin includes the overflow.

The observed combined 95% CL exclusion limits in the the gluino simplified models using for each model point the signal region with the best expected sensitivity. The limits are presented in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ models.

The expected combined 95% CL exclusion limits in the the gluino simplified models using for each model point the signal region with the best expected sensitivity. The limits are presented in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ models.

The yellow band ($+ 1 \sigma$) of the combined 95% CL exclusion limits in the the gluino simplified models using for each model point the signal region with the best expected sensitivity. The limits are presented in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ models. The yellow band represents the $\pm 1 \sigma$ variation of the median expected limit due to the experimental and theoretical uncertainties.

The yellow band ($- 1 \sigma$) of the combined 95% CL exclusion limits in the the gluino simplified models using for each model point the signal region with the best expected sensitivity. The limits are presented in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ models. The yellow band represents the $\pm 1 \sigma$ variation of the median expected limit due to the experimental and theoretical uncertainties.

The observed combined 95% CL exclusion limits in the the gluino simplified models using for each model point the signal region with the best expected sensitivity. The limits are presented in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models where $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$.

The expected combined 95% CL exclusion limits in the the gluino simplified models using for each model point the signal region with the best expected sensitivity. The limits are presented in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models where $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$.

The yellow band ($+ 1 \sigma$) of the combined 95% CL exclusion limits in the the gluino simplified models using for each model point the signal region with the best expected sensitivity. The limits are presented in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models where $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$. The yellow band represents the $\pm 1 \sigma$ variation of the median expected limit due to the experimental and theoretical uncertainties.

The yellow band ($- 1 \sigma$) of the combined 95% CL exclusion limits in the the gluino simplified models using for each model point the signal region with the best expected sensitivity. The limits are presented in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models where $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$. The yellow band represents the $\pm 1 \sigma$ variation of the median expected limit due to the experimental and theoretical uncertainties.

The observed limits for the soft-lepton 2-jet signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ models.

The expected limits for the soft-lepton 2-jet signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ models.

The observed limits for the hard-lepton 4-jet low-x signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ models.

The expected limits for the hard-lepton 4-jet low-x signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ models.

The observed limits for the hard-lepton 5-jet signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ models.

The expected limits for the hard-lepton 5-jet signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ models.

The observed limits for the hard-lepton 6-jet signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ models.

The expected limits for the hard-lepton 6-jet signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ models.

The observed limits for the soft-lepton 5-jet signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models where $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$.

The expected limits for the soft-lepton 5-jet signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models where $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$.

The observed limits for the hard-lepton 4-jet low-x signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models where $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$.

The expected limits for the hard-lepton 4-jet low-x signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models where $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$.

The observed limits for the hard-lepton 4-jet high-x signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models where $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$.

The expected limits for the hard-lepton 4-jet high-x signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models where $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$.

The observed limits for the hard-lepton 5-jet signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models where $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$.

The expected limits for the hard-lepton 5-jet signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models where $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$.

The observed limits for the hard-lepton 6-jet signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models where $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$.

The expected limits for the hard-lepton 6-jet signal region. The limits are presented in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models where $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$.

Number of generated events in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$.

Number of generated events in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models.

Production cross-section in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$.

Production cross-section in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models.

Acceptance times efficiency obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ (hard-lepton 4-jet low-x).

Acceptance times efficiency in the different signal regions in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ (hard-lepton 4-jet high-x).

Acceptance times efficiency in the different signal regions in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ (hard-lepton 5-jet).

Acceptance times efficiency in the different signal regions in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ (hard-lepton 6-jet).

Acceptance times efficiency in the different signal regions in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ (soft-lepton 2-jet).

Acceptance times efficiency obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models (hard-lepton 4-jet low-x).

Acceptance times efficiency in the different signal regions in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models (hard-lepton 4-jet high-x).

Acceptance times efficiency in the different signal regions in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models (hard-lepton 5-jet).

Acceptance times efficiency in the different signal regions in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models (hard-lepton 6-jet).

Acceptance times efficiency in the different signal regions in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models (soft-lepton 5-jet).

The observed CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ (hard-lepton 4-jet low-x).

The observed CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ (hard-lepton 4-jet high-x).

The observed CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ (hard-lepton 5-jet).

The observed CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ (hard-lepton 6-jet).

The observed CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ (soft-lepton 2-jet).

The expected CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ (hard-lepton 4-jet low-x).

The expected CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ (hard-lepton 4-jet high-x).

The expected CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ (hard-lepton 5-jet).

The expected CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ (hard-lepton 6-jet).

The expected CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$ (soft-lepton 2-jet).

The observed CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models (hard-lepton 4-jet low-x).

The observed CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models (hard-lepton 4-jet high-x).

The observed CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models (hard-lepton 5-jet).

The observed CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models (hard-lepton 6-jet).

The observed CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models (soft-lepton 5-jet).

The expected CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models (hard-lepton 4-jet low-x).

The expected CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models (hard-lepton 4-jet high-x).

The expected CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models (hard-lepton 5-jet).

The expected CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models (hard-lepton 6-jet).

The expected CLs values as obtained in the different signal regions in the (gluino, x) plane for the chargino = 60 GeV models (soft-lepton 5-jet).

The signal region yielding in the best expected limit is indicated for every signal point used in the the gluino simplified models for the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$.

The signal region yielding in the best expected limit is indicated for every signal point used in the the gluino simplified models for the (gluino, x) mass plane where for the chargino = 60 GeV and $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$.

Model-dependent 95% CL upper limits on the visible cross-section in addition to the observed and expected exclusion limits for the (gluino, chargino) mass plane for the scenario where the mass of the chargino is fixed to $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1)) = 1/2$.

Model-dependent 95% CL upper limits on the visible cross-section in addition to the observed and expected exclusion limits for the (gluino, x) mass plane where for the chargino = 60 GeV and $x=(m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)-m(\tilde\chi^0_1))/(m(\tilde g) - m(\tilde\chi^0_1))$.

Simulated background event samples: the corresponding generator, parton shower, cross-section normalisation, PDF set and underlying-event tune are shown.

Overview of the selection criteria for the soft-lepton signal regions. The symbol $p_{T}^{l}$ refers to signal leptons.

Overview of the selection criteria for the hard-lepton signal regions. The symbol $p_{T}^{l}$ refers to signal leptons.

Background fit results for the hard-lepton and soft-lepton signal regions, for an integrated luminosity of 3.2 fb-1. Uncertainties in the fitted background estimates combine statistical (in the simulated event yields) and systematic uncertainties. The uncertainties in this table are symmetrised for propagation purposes but truncated at zero to remain within the physical boundaries.

Breakdown of upper limits. The columns show from left to right: the name of the respective signal region; the 95% confidence level (CL) upper limits on the visible cross-section and on the number of signal events the 95% CL upper limit on the number of signal events, given the expected number (and $\pm 1 \sigma$ variations on the expectation) of background events; the two-sided CLb value, i.e. the confidence level observed for the background-only hypothesis and the one-sided discovery p-value (p(s = 0)). The discovery p-values are capped to 0.5 in the case of observing less events than the fitted background estimates.

Table shows the data, fitted background and expected signal event counts for a benchmark signal point in each bin of the mt distribution shown in figure 5 (top left). The fit results are shown for an integrated luminosity of 3.2 fb-1.

Table shows the data, fitted background and expected signal event counts for a benchmark signal point in each bin of the met/meff distribution shown in figure 5 (top right). The fit results are shown for an integrated luminosity of 3.2 fb-1.

Table shows the data, fitted background and expected signal event counts for a benchmark signal point in each bin of the mt distribution shown in figure 5 (middle left). The fit results are shown for an integrated luminosity of 3.2 fb-1.

Table shows the data, fitted background and expected signal event counts for a benchmark signal point in each bin of the mt distribution shown in figure 5 (middle right). The fit results are shown for an integrated luminosity of 3.2 fb-1.

Table shows the data, fitted background and expected signal event counts for a benchmark signal point in each bin of the met distribution shown in figure 5 (bottom left). The fit results are shown for an integrated luminosity of 3.2 fb-1.

Table shows the data, fitted background and expected signal event counts for a benchmark signal point in each bin of the met distribution shown in figure 5 (bottom right). The fit results are shown for an integrated luminosity of 3.2 fb-1.

Cutflow table for the hard-lepton signal regions with representative target signal models. The weighted numbers are normalized to 3.2 fb-1 and rounded to the statistical error.

Cutflow table for the hard-lepton signal regions with representative target signal models. The weighted numbers are normalized to 3.2 fb-1 and rounded to the statistical error.

Observed and expected background and signal effective mass distributions for SR2jl. For signal, a squark direct decay model with $m(\tilde q)=800$ GeV and $m(\tilde\chi^0_1)=400$ GeV is shown.

Observed and expected background and signal effective mass distributions for SR2jm. For signal, a gluino direct decay model with $m(\tilde g)=750$ GeV and $m(\tilde\chi^0_1)=660$ GeV is shown.

Observed and expected background and signal effective mass distributions for SR2jt. For signal, a squark direct decay model with $m(\tilde q)=1200$ GeV and $m(\tilde\chi^0_1)=0$ GeV is shown.

Observed and expected background and signal effective mass distributions for SR4jt. For signal, a gluino direct decay model with $m(\tilde g)=1400$ GeV and $m(\tilde\chi^0_1)=0$ GeV is shown.

Observed and expected background and signal effective mass distributions for SR5j. For signal, a gluino one-step decay model with $m(\tilde g)=1265$ GeV, $m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)=945$ GeV and $m(\tilde\chi^0_1)=625$ GeV is shown.

Observed and expected background and signal effective mass distributions for SR6jm. For signal, a gluino one-step decay model with $m(\tilde g)=1265$ GeV, $m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)=945$ GeV and $m(\tilde\chi^0_1)=625$ GeV is shown.

Observed and expected background and signal effective mass distributions for SR6jt. For signal, a gluino one-step decay model with $m(\tilde g)=1385$ GeV, $m(\tilde\chi^\pm_1)=705$ GeV and $m(\tilde\chi^0_1)=25$ GeV is shown.

Expected limit at 95% CL for squark direct decay model grid.

Expected limits at 95% CL +1 sigma excursion due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties for squark direct decay model grid.

Expected limits at 95% CL -1 sigma excursion due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties for squark direct decay model grid.

Observed limits at 95% CL for squark direct decay model grid.

Observed limits at 95% CL +1 sigma excursion due to the signal cross-section uncertainty for squark direct decay model grid.

Observed limits at 95% CL -1 sigma excursion due to the signal cross-section uncertainty for squark direct decay model grid.

Expected limit at 95% CL for gluino direct decay model grid.

Expected limits at 95% CL +1 sigma excursion due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties for gluino direct decay model grid.

Expected limits at 95% CL -1 sigma excursion due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties for gluino direct decay model grid.

Observed limits at 95% CL for gluino direct decay model grid.

Observed limits at 95% CL +1 sigma excursion due to the signal cross-section uncertainty for gluino direct decay model grid.

Observed limits at 95% CL -1 sigma excursion due to the signal cross-section uncertainty for gluino direct decay model grid.

Expected limit at 95% CL for gluino one-step decay model grid.

Expected limits at 95% CL +1 sigma excursion due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties for gluino one-step decay model grid.

Expected limits at 95% CL -1 sigma excursion due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties for gluino one-step decay model grid.

Observed limits at 95% CL for gluino one-step decay model grid.

Observed limits at 95% CL +1 sigma excursion due to the signal cross-section uncertainty for gluino one-step decay model grid.

Observed limits at 95% CL -1 sigma excursion due to the signal cross-section uncertainty for gluino one-step decay model grid.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRgamma for SR2jl.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in validation region VRZ for SR2jl.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRW for SR2jl.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRT for SR2jl.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRgamma for SR2jm.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in validation region VRZ for SR2jm.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRW for SR2jm.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRT for SR2jm.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRgamma for SR2jt.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in validation region VRZ for SR2jt.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRW for SR2jt.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRT for SR2jt.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRgamma for SR4jt.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in validation region VRZ for SR4jt.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRW for SR4jt.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRT for SR4jt.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRgamma for SR5j.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in validation region VRZ for SR5j.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRW for SR5j.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRT for SR5j.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRgamma for SR6jm.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in validation region VRZ for SR6jm.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRW for SR6jm.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRT for SR6jm.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRgamma for SR6jt.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in validation region VRZ for SR6jt.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRW for SR6jt.

Observed and expected background effective mass distributions in control region CRT for SR6jt.

Observed and expected event yields in VRZ as a function of signal region.

Observed and expected event yields in VRW as a function of signal region.

Observed and expected event yields in VRWv as a function of signal region.

Observed and expected event yields in VRT as a function of signal region.

Observed and expected event yields in VRTv as a function of signal region.

Observed and expected event yields in VRQa as a function of signal region.

Observed and expected event yields in VRQb as a function of signal region.

Signal acceptance for SR2jl in squark direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR2jl in squark direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR2jm in squark direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR2jm in squark direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR2jt in squark direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR2jt in squark direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR4jt in squark direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR4jt in squark direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR5j in squark direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR5j in squark direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR6jm in squark direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR6jm in squark direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR6jt in squark direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR6jt in squark direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR2jl in gluino direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR2jl in gluino direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR2jm in gluino direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR2jm in gluino direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR2jt in gluino direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR2jt in gluino direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR4jt in gluino direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR4jt in gluino direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR5j in gluino direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR5j in gluino direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR6jm in gluino direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR6jm in gluino direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR6jt in gluino direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR6jt in gluino direct decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR2jl in gluino one-step decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR2jl in gluino one-step decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR2jm in gluino one-step decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR2jm in gluino one-step decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR2j5 in gluino one-step decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR2jt in gluino one-step decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR4jt in gluino one-step decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR4jt in gluino one-step decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR5j in gluino one-step decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR5j in gluino one-step decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR6jm in gluino one-step decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR6jm in gluino one-step decay model grid.

Signal acceptance for SR6jt in gluino one-step decay model grid.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for SR6jt in gluino one-step decay model grid.

The inclusive prompt photon cross section with systematic and statistical uncertainties for the region 1.81<|eta(gamma)| < 2.37.