DM exclusion limit in the two-dimensional phase space of WIMP mass m_χ vs mediator mass m_med determined using the combined ee+μμ channel. Both the observed and expected limits are presented, and the 1σ uncertainty band for the expected limits is also provided. Regions bounded by the limit curves are excluded at the 95% CL. The grey line labelled with "m_med = 2m_χ'' indicates the kinematic threshold where the mediator can decay on-shell into WIMPs, and the other grey line gives the perturbative limit (arXiv 1603.04156). The relic density line (arXiv 1603.04156) illustrates the combination of m_χ and m_med that would explain the observed DM relic density.

DM exclusion limit in the two-dimensional phase space of WIMP mass m_χ vs mediator mass m_med determined using the combined ee+μμ channel. Both the observed and expected limits are presented, and the 1σ uncertainty band for the expected limits is also provided. Regions bounded by the limit curves are excluded at the 95% CL. The grey line labelled with "m_med = 2m_χ'' indicates the kinematic threshold where the mediator can decay on-shell into WIMPs, and the other grey line gives the perturbative limit (arXiv 1603.04156). The relic density line (arXiv 1603.04156) illustrates the combination of m_χ and m_med that would explain the observed DM relic density.

DM exclusion limit in the two-dimensional phase space of WIMP mass m_χ vs mediator mass m_med determined using the combined ee+μμ channel. Both the observed and expected limits are presented, and the 1σ uncertainty band for the expected limits is also provided. Regions bounded by the limit curves are excluded at the 95% CL. The grey line labelled with "m_med = 2m_χ'' indicates the kinematic threshold where the mediator can decay on-shell into WIMPs, and the other grey line gives the perturbative limit (arXiv 1603.04156). The relic density line (arXiv 1603.04156) illustrates the combination of m_χ and m_med that would explain the observed DM relic density.

The 95% CL upper limits on the production cross-section of the ZH process with the prompt Z→ ee and Z→ μμ decays and the invisible Higgs boson decays as a function of m_H, obtained from the combined ee+μμ channel. The observed and expected limits are given, as well as the ±1σ and ±2σ error bands on the expected limits. The signal process is only modelled for the qq initial state, and the theory uncertainties on the signal prediction are not considered.

DM exclusion limit in the two-dimensional phase space of m_χ vs m_med set using the combined ee+μμ channel. The DM model assumes a vector mediator, a fermionic WIMP, and the coupling parameters g_q = 0.25 and g_χ = 1. Both the observed and expected limits are presented, and the 1σ uncertainty band for the expected limits is also provided. Regions bounded by the limit curves are excluded at the 95% CL. The grey line labelled with "m_med = 2m_χ'' indicates the kinematic threshold where the mediator can decay on-shell into WIMPs. The relic density line [arXiv 1603.04156] illustrates the combination of m_χ and m_med that would explain the observed DM relic density.

DM exclusion limit in the two-dimensional phase space of m_χ vs m_med set using the combined ee+μμ channel. The DM model assumes a vector mediator, a fermionic WIMP, and the coupling parameters g_q = 0.25 and g_χ = 1. Both the observed and expected limits are presented, and the 1σ uncertainty band for the expected limits is also provided. Regions bounded by the limit curves are excluded at the 95% CL. The grey line labelled with "m_med = 2m_χ'' indicates the kinematic threshold where the mediator can decay on-shell into WIMPs. The relic density line [arXiv 1603.04156] illustrates the combination of m_χ and m_med that would explain the observed DM relic density.

DM exclusion limit in the two-dimensional phase space of m_χ vs m_med set using the combined ee+μμ channel. The DM model assumes a vector mediator, a fermionic WIMP, and the coupling parameters g_q = 0.25 and g_χ = 1. Both the observed and expected limits are presented, and the 1σ uncertainty band for the expected limits is also provided. Regions bounded by the limit curves are excluded at the 95% CL. The grey line labelled with "m_med = 2m_χ'' indicates the kinematic threshold where the mediator can decay on-shell into WIMPs. The relic density line [arXiv 1603.04156] illustrates the combination of m_χ and m_med that would explain the observed DM relic density.

DM exclusion limit in the two-dimensional phase space of m_χ vs m_med set using the combined ee+μμ channel. The DM model assumes a vector mediator, a fermionic WIMP, and the coupling parameters g_q = 0.25 and g_χ = 1. Both the observed and expected limits are presented, and the 1σ uncertainty band for the expected limits is also provided. Regions bounded by the limit curves are excluded at the 95% CL. The grey line labelled with "m_med = 2m_χ'' indicates the kinematic threshold where the mediator can decay on-shell into WIMPs. The relic density line [arXiv 1603.04156] illustrates the combination of m_χ and m_med that would explain the observed DM relic density.

Limits on the WIMP and proton scattering cross section as a function of WIMP mass, obtained for simplified dark matter models with an axial-vector mediator (left) and a vector mediator (right). The solid black line shows the observed limit at the 90% confidence level from this search. The left plot incorporates the latest results from these competitive direct-search experiments, LUX [arXiv 1705.03380], PICO-2L [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 231302], and PICO-60 [arXiv 1702.07666]. The right plot incorporates the latest results from the following experiments, CRESST-II [Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 25], CDMSlite [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 071301], PandaX-II [Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 121303], LUX [Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 021303], and XENON1T [arXiv 1705.06655].

Limits on the WIMP and proton scattering cross section as a function of WIMP mass, obtained for simplified dark matter models with an axial-vector mediator (left) and a vector mediator (right). The solid black line shows the observed limit at the 90% confidence level from this search. The left plot incorporates the latest results from these competitive direct-search experiments, LUX [arXiv 1705.03380], PICO-2L [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 231302], and PICO-60 [arXiv 1702.07666]. The right plot incorporates the latest results from the following experiments, CRESST-II [Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 25], CDMSlite [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 071301], PandaX-II [Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 121303], LUX [Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 021303], and XENON1T [arXiv 1705.06655].

Observed and expected upper limit on the cross-section for $pp \to H^{++}H^{--}$ for a combination of partial branching ratios of $B(ee) = 30\%$, $B(e \mu ) = 40\%$, and $B( \mu \mu ) = 30\%$.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{L}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass as a function of the branching ratio $B(H_{L}^{\pm\pm} \to e^{\pm}e^{\pm})$ where $B(H_{L}^{\pm\pm} \to X) = 1 - B(H_{L}^{\pm\pm} \to e^{\pm}e^{\pm})$, with "$X$" not entering any of the signal regions.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{L}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass as a function of the branching ratio $B(H_{L}^{\pm\pm} \to \mu^{\pm}\mu^{\pm})$ where $B(H_{L}^{\pm\pm} \to X) = 1 - B(H_{L}^{\pm\pm} \to \mu^{\pm}\mu^{\pm})$, with "$X$" not entering any of the signal regions.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{L}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass as a function of the branching ratio $B(H_{L}^{\pm\pm} \to e^{\pm}\mu^{\pm})$ where $B(H_{L}^{\pm\pm} \to X) = 1 - B(H_{L}^{\pm\pm} \to e^{\pm}\mu^{\pm})$, with "$X$" not entering any of the signal regions.

Minimum observed and expected lower limit (among all partial branching ratio combinations) on the $H_{L}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass as a function of the branching ratio $B(H_{L}^{\pm\pm} \to \ell^{\pm}\ell^{\pm})$ where $B(H_{L}^{\pm\pm} \to X) = 1 - B(H_{L}^{\pm\pm} \to \ell^{\pm}\ell^{\pm})$, with "$X$" not entering any of the signal regions.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{R}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass as a function of the branching ratio $B(H_{R}^{\pm\pm} \to e^{\pm}e^{\pm})$ where $B(H_{R}^{\pm\pm} \to X) = 1 - B(H_{R}^{\pm\pm} \to e^{\pm}e^{\pm})$, with "$X$" not entering any of the signal regions.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{R}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass as a function of the branching ratio $B(H_{R}^{\pm\pm} \to \mu^{\pm}\mu^{\pm})$ where $B(H_{R}^{\pm\pm} \to X) = 1 - B(H_{R}^{\pm\pm} \to \mu^{\pm}\mu^{\pm})$, with "$X$" not entering any of the signal regions.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{R}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass as a function of the branching ratio $B(H_{R}^{\pm\pm} \to e^{\pm}\mu^{\pm})$ where $B(H_{R}^{\pm\pm} \to X) = 1 - B(H_{R}^{\pm\pm} \to e^{\pm}\mu^{\pm})$, with "$X$" not entering any of the signal regions.

Minimum observed and expected lower limit (among all partial branching ratio combinations) on the $H_{R}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass as a function of the branching ratio $B(H_{R}^{\pm\pm} \to \ell^{\pm}\ell^{\pm})$ where $B(H_{R}^{\pm\pm} \to X) = 1 - B(H_{R}^{\pm\pm} \to \ell^{\pm}\ell^{\pm})$, with "$X$" not entering any of the signal regions.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{L}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 100%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{R}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 100%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{L}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 90%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{R}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 90%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{L}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 80%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{R}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 80%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{L}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 70%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{R}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 70%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{L}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 60%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{R}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 60%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{L}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 50%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{R}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 50%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{L}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 40%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{R}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 40%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{L}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 30%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{R}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 30%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{L}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 20%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{R}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 20%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{L}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 10%.

Observed and expected lower limit on the $H_{R}^{\pm\pm}$ boson mass for all branching ratio combinations ($B(ee)$,$B(e\mu)$,$B(\mu\mu)$) that sum to 10%.

Reconstructed mtb distribution in data and for the background after the fit to the data in the signal region SR2. The statistical uncertainty on data points is calculated using assymetric Poisson confidence intervals.

Reconstructed mtb distribution in data and for the background after the fit to the data in the signal region SR3. The statistical uncertainty on data points is calculated using assymetric Poisson confidence intervals.

Reconstructed mtb distribution in data and for the background after the fit to the data in the validation region VR. The statistical uncertainty on data points is calculated using assymetric Poisson confidence intervals.

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in Pb+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in Pb+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in p+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in p+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in pp from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in pp from different methods

Photon-jet pT balance distributions (1/Ng)(dN/dxJg) in pp events (blue, reproduced on all panels) and Pb+Pb events (red) with each panel denoting a different centrality selection. These panels show results with pTg = 158-200 GeV. Total systematic uncertainties are shown as boxes, while statistical uncertainties are shown with vertical bars.

Selected comparisons of the nominal results in pp (blue) and 0-10% Pb+Pb (red) collisions with the central values obtained using a different photon-jet signal definition. Comparison of the nominal results (with DeltaPhi > 7pi/8) with those obtained using DeltaPhi > 3pi/4 for the pTg = 63.1-79.6 GeV range. Boxes indicate total systematic uncertainties, while vertical bars indicate statistical uncertainties.

Selected comparisons of the nominal results in pp (blue) and 0-10% Pb+Pb (red) collisions with the central values obtained using a different photon-jet signal definition. Comparison of the nominal results (inclusive jet selection) with those obtained using a photon-plus-leading-jet selection for the pTg = 100-158 GeV range. Boxes indicate total systematic uncertainties, while vertical bars indicate statistical uncertainties.

Detailed breakdown of systematic uncertainties for the measurement in the central rapidity electron channel. Common systematic uncertainty on the luminosity measurment of 1.8% is not included. Correlated systematic uncertainties with the suffix :A should be treated as additive and with the suffix :M should be treated as multiplicative. The source 'sys,uncor' represents bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainty. The cross sections are given at the Born QED level. 'C Dressed' represents the multiplicative correction factor to translate the cross sections to the dressed level with the cone radius of 0.1: SigmaDressed = C Dressed * SigmaBorn.

Detailed breakdown of systematic uncertainties for the measurement in the central rapidity electron channel. Common systematic uncertainty on the luminosity measurment of 1.8% is not included. Correlated systematic uncertainties with the suffix :A should be treated as additive and with the suffix :M should be treated as multiplicative. The source 'sys,uncor' represents bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainty. The cross sections are given at the Born QED level. 'C Dressed' represents the multiplicative correction factor to translate the cross sections to the dressed level with the cone radius of 0.1: SigmaDressed = C Dressed * SigmaBorn.

Detailed breakdown of systematic uncertainties for the measurement in the central rapidity electron channel. Common systematic uncertainty on the luminosity measurment of 1.8% is not included. Correlated systematic uncertainties with the suffix :A should be treated as additive and with the suffix :M should be treated as multiplicative. The source 'sys,uncor' represents bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainty. The cross sections are given at the Born QED level. 'C Dressed' represents the multiplicative correction factor to translate the cross sections to the dressed level with the cone radius of 0.1: SigmaDressed = C Dressed * SigmaBorn.

Detailed breakdown of systematic uncertainties for the measurement in the forward rapidity electron channel. Common systematic uncertainty on the luminosity measurment of 1.8% is not included. Correlated systematic uncertainties with the suffix :A should be treated as additive and with the suffix :M should be treated as multiplicative. The source 'sys,uncor' represents bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainty. The cross sections are given at the Born QED level. 'C Dressed' represents the multiplicative correction factor to translate the cross sections to the dressed level with the cone radius of 0.1: SigmaDressed = C Dressed * SigmaBorn.

Detailed breakdown of systematic uncertainties for the measurement in the forward rapidity electron channel. Common systematic uncertainty on the luminosity measurment of 1.8% is not included. Correlated systematic uncertainties with the suffix :A should be treated as additive and with the suffix :M should be treated as multiplicative. The source 'sys,uncor' represents bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainty. The cross sections are given at the Born QED level. 'C Dressed' represents the multiplicative correction factor to translate the cross sections to the dressed level with the cone radius of 0.1: SigmaDressed = C Dressed * SigmaBorn.

Detailed breakdown of systematic uncertainties for the measurement in the forward rapidity electron channel. Common systematic uncertainty on the luminosity measurment of 1.8% is not included. Correlated systematic uncertainties with the suffix :A should be treated as additive and with the suffix :M should be treated as multiplicative. The source 'sys,uncor' represents bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainty. The cross sections are given at the Born QED level. 'C Dressed' represents the multiplicative correction factor to translate the cross sections to the dressed level with the cone radius of 0.1: SigmaDressed = C Dressed * SigmaBorn.

Detailed breakdown of systematic uncertainties for the combined measurement of muon, electron central and electron central-forward channels. Common systematic uncertainty on the luminosity measurment of 1.8% is not included. The source 'sys,uncor' represents bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainty. The cross sections are given at the Born QED level.

Detailed breakdown of systematic uncertainties for the combined measurement of muon, electron central and electron central-forward channels. Common systematic uncertainty on the luminosity measurment of 1.8% is not included. The source 'sys,uncor' represents bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainty. The cross sections are given at the Born QED level.

Detailed breakdown of systematic uncertainties for the combined measurement of muon, electron central and electron central-forward channels. Common systematic uncertainty on the luminosity measurment of 1.8% is not included. The source 'sys,uncor' represents bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainty. The cross sections are given at the Born QED level.

Detailed breakdown of systematic uncertainties for the combined measurement, integerated in cos theta_CS (differential in y, Mll) Common systematic uncertainty on the luminosity measurment of 1.8% is not included. The source 'sys,uncor' represents bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainty. The cross sections are given at the Born QED level.

Detailed breakdown of systematic uncertainties for the combined measurement, integerated in cos theta_CS (differential in y, Mll) Common systematic uncertainty on the luminosity measurment of 1.8% is not included. The source 'sys,uncor' represents bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainty. The cross sections are given at the Born QED level.

Detailed breakdown of systematic uncertainties for the combined measurement, integerated in cos theta_CS (differential in y, Mll) Common systematic uncertainty on the luminosity measurment of 1.8% is not included. The source 'sys,uncor' represents bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainty. The cross sections are given at the Born QED level.

Detailed breakdown of systematic uncertainties for the combined measurement, integerated in cos theta_CS and y (differential in Mll) Common systematic uncertainty on the luminosity measurment of 1.8% is not included. The source 'sys,uncor' represents bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainty. The cross sections are given at the Born QED level.

Detailed breakdown of systematic uncertainties for the combined measurement, integerated in cos theta_CS and y (differential in Mll) Common systematic uncertainty on the luminosity measurment of 1.8% is not included. The source 'sys,uncor' represents bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainty. The cross sections are given at the Born QED level.

Detailed breakdown of systematic uncertainties for the combined measurement, integerated in cos theta_CS and y (differential in Mll) Common systematic uncertainty on the luminosity measurment of 1.8% is not included. The source 'sys,uncor' represents bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainty. The cross sections are given at the Born QED level.

Powheg based prediction for AFB in the central-central fiducial phase space, as reported in Fig 16 of the paper. Powheg prediction is corrected to NNLO QCD and NLO EWK, as described in the paper. PDF uncertainties are computed using CT10 PDF set scaled to 68%.

Powheg based prediction for AFB in the central-fiducial fiducial phase space, as reported in Fig 17 of the paper. Powheg prediction is corrected to NNLO QCD and NLO EWK, as described in the paper. PDF uncertainties are computed using CT10 PDF set scaled to 68%.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 316.22 < pTjet < 398.10 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 398.10 < pTjet < 501.18 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 126.00 < pTjet < 158.49 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 158.49 < pTjet < 199.53 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 0.3.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 199.53 < pTjet < 251.19 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.3 < eta < 0.8.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.8 < eta < 1.2.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 1.2 < eta < 2.1.

Excess transverse momenta in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.

The D(z) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

Excess particles in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.

The D(pT) distributions in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

The ratio of the D(z) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 126 < pTJet < 158.5 GeV.

The ratio of the D(pT) in different centrality intervals in PbPb and in pp for 251.19 < pTjet < 316.22 and 0.0 < eta < 2.1.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 158.5 < pTJet < 199.5 GeV.

Excess transverse momenta in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 199.5 < pTJet < 251.8 GeV.

Excess particles in jet in PbPb compared to pp collisions in different centrality selections for abs(jet rapidity) < 2.1.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 126 < pTJet < 158.5 GeV.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 158.5 < pTJet < 199.5 GeV.

Ratio of R(D(z)) distributions in a given abs(jet rapidity) region to R(D(z)) for abs(jet rapidity) < 0.3 for 199.5 < pTJet < 251.8 GeV.

The expected upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 4\gamma$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$. Additionally, the expected limits are not provided for a small number of points, indicated with a hyphen, because of a technical failure with the computation.

The observed upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 6\pi^0$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow 3\pi^0)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$.

The expected upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 6\pi^0$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow 3\pi^0)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$. Additionally, the expected limits are not provided for a small number of points, indicated with a hyphen, because of a technical failure with the computation.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the visible cross section as a function of $m_X$ and the fraction of events in the low-$\Delta E$ category.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Selection efficiency for photons originating from the BSM process $X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, where the $X$ particle is a high-mass narrow-width scalar particle originating from the gluon--gluon fusion process.

Fraction of photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for photons originating from the BSM process $X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, where the $X$ particle is a high-mass narrow-width scalar particle originating from the gluon--gluon fusion process.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=5$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=5$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=5$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=15$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=15$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=15$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=40$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=40$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=40$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=250$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=500$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=500$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=500$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=800$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=800$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=800$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1200$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1200$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1200$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1500$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1500$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1500$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=2000$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=2000$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=2000$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV and $m_{s}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV and $m_{s}=150$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV and $m_{s}=150$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV and $m_{s}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%

The PT scale factor for V2(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality

The PT scale factor for V3(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality

The V2 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality

The V3 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV