Normalized Delta_Phi distributions for events with a maximum jet pT between 200 and 300 GeV.

Normalized Delta_Phi distributions for events with a maximum jet pT > 300 GeV.

Ratio of unfolded width of azimuthal angular correlation distributions (P PB/ P P). Different colors correspond to different combinations of p_{T,1} and p_{T,2}

Ratio of unfolded Dijet conditional yields (P PB/ P P). Different colors correspond to different combinations of p_{T,1} and p_{T,2}

Unfolded width of azimuthal angular correlation distributions (Delta p_{T} > 3). Full markers represent p+Pb, open markers p+p

Unfolded Dijet conditional yields (Delta p_{T} > 3). Full markers represent p+Pb, open markers p+p

Ratio of unfolded width of azimuthal angular correlation distributions (P PB/ P P) (Delta p_{T} > 3). Different colors correspond to different combinations of p_{T,1} and p_{T,2}

Ratio of unfolded Dijet conditional yields (P PB/ P P) (Delta p_{T} > 3). Different colors correspond to different combinations of p_{T,1} and p_{T,2}

Unfolded azimuthal angular correlation distributions. Black markers represent p+Pb, red markers p+p

Unfolded azimuthal angular correlation distributions (Delta p_{T} > 3). Black markers represent p+Pb, red markers p+p

Parton inclusive-jet $p_T$ and $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties for jet-$\eta$ region $0.5<|\eta|<1$.

Parton inclusive-jet $p_T$ and $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties for jet-$\eta$ region $|\eta|<0.5$.

Parton dijet invariant mass $M_{inv}$ and $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties for the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) = \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology.

Parton dijet invariant mass $M_{inv}$ and $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties for the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) \neq \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology.

Parton inclusive-jet $p_T$, $x_T$, and $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties for jet-$\eta$ region $|\eta|<1$.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties for inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $0.5<|\eta|<1$ region. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties for inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $|\eta|<0.5$ region. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties for inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $|\eta|<1$ region. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $|\eta|<0.5$ region and jets in the $0.5<|\eta|<1$ region. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $0.5<|\eta|<1$ region with dijet measurements with the the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) = \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $0.5<|\eta|<1$ region with dijet measurements with the the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) \neq \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $|\eta|<0.5$ region with dijet measurements with the the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) = \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $|\eta|<0.5$ region with dijet measurements with the the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) \neq \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $|\eta|<1$ region with dijet measurements with the the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) = \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling inclusive jet measurements with jets in the $|\eta|<1$ region with dijet measurements with the the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) \neq \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties for dijet measurements with the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) = \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties for dijet measurements with the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) \neq \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties coupling dijet measurements with the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) \neq \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology and the $\textrm{sign}(\eta_1) = \textrm{sign}(\eta_2)$ topology. The $A_{LL}$ uncertainty contribution of $0.0007$ from uncertainty in the relative luminosity measurement and $6.1\%$ from the beam polarization uncertainty, which are common to all the data points, are separated from the listed values.

Parton dijet $M_{inv}$ vs $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties, for topology C.

Parton dijet $M_{inv}$ vs $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties, for topology D.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (statistical and systematics) for the inclusive jet measurements.The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (statistical and systematics) for the inclusive jet measurements coupling with the forward-forward dijet measurements (topology A). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (statistical and systematics) for the inclusive jet measurements coupling with the forward-forward dijet measurements (topology B). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (statistical and systematics) for the inclusive jet measurements coupling with the forward-forward dijet measurements (topology C). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (statistical and systematics) for the inclusive jet measurements coupling with the forward-forward dijet measurements (topology D). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) for forward-forward dijet measurements (topology A). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) coupling forward-forward dijet measurements (topology A) with forward-central dijet measurements (topology B). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) coupling forward-forward dijet measurements (topology A) with forward-central dijet measurements (topology C). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) coupling forward-forward dijet measurements (topology A) with forward-central dijet measurements (topology D). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) for forward-forward dijet measurements (topology B). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) coupling forward-forward dijet measurements (topology B) with forward-central dijet measurements (topology C). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) coupling forward-forward dijet measurements (topology B) with forward-central dijet measurements (topology D). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) for forward-forward dijet measurements (topology C). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) coupling forward-forward dijet measurements (topology C) with forward-central dijet measurements (topology D). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

The correlation matrix for the point-to-point uncertainties (systematics only) for forward-forward dijet measurements (topology D). The relative luminosity and beam polarization uncertainties are not included because they are the same for all points.

Normalized dijet angular distribution for the dijet mass range 1100 to 1400 GeV.

Normalized dijet angular distribution for the dijet mass range 850 to 1100 GeV.

Normalized dijet angular distribution for the dijet mass range 650 to 850 GeV.

Normalized dijet angular distribution for the dijet mass range 500 to 650 GeV.

Normalized dijet angular distribution for the dijet mass range 350 to 500 GeV.

Normalized dijet angular distribution for the dijet mass range 250 to 350 GeV.

Distribution for the maxPT jet (P=3) from 260 to 310 GeV.

Distribution for the maxPT jet (P=3) from 310 to 400 GeV.

Distribution for the maxPT jet (P=3) from 400 to 500 GeV.

Distribution for the maxPT jet (P=3) from 500 to 600 GeV.

Distribution for the maxPT jet (P=3) from 600 to 800 GeV.

Distribution for the maxPT jet (P=3) from 800 to 10000 GeV.

Numerical results of $b \bar{b}$- and $c \bar{c}$-dijet cross-sections, $c \bar{c}$/$b \bar{b}$ dijet cross-section ratios and their total uncertainties as a function of the leading jet $p_T$.

Numerical results of $b \bar{b}$- and $c \bar{c}$-dijet cross-sections, $c\bar{c}$/$b \bar{b}$ dijet cross-section ratios and their total uncertainties as a function of $m_{jj}$ (dijet invariant mass).

Covariance matrix, corresponding to the total uncertainties, obtained between the leading jet eta intervals of the $b \bar{b}$-dijet differential cross sections. The unit of all the elements of the matrix is nb$^2$.

Covariance matrix, corresponding to the total uncertainties, obtained between the leading jet eta intervals of the $c \bar{c}$-dijet differential cross sections. The unit of all the elements of the matrix is nb$^2$.

Covariance matrix, corresponding to the total uncertainties, obtained between the leading jet $\eta$ intervals of the $b \bar{b}$ (horizontal) and $c \bar{c}$ (vertical) differential cross sections. The unit of all the elements of the matrix is nb$^2$.

Covariance matrix, corresponding to the total uncertainties, obtained between the $\Delta y^*$ intervals of the $b \bar{b}$-dijet differential cross sections. The unit of all the elements of the matrix is nb$^2$.

Covariance matrix, corresponding to the total uncertainties, obtained between the $\Delta y^*$ intervals of the $c \bar{c}$-dijet differential cross sections. The unit of all the elements of the matrix is nb$^2$.

Covariance matrix, corresponding to the total uncertainties, obtained between the $\Delta y^*$ intervals of the $b \bar{b}$ (horizontal) and $c \bar{c}$ (vertical) differential cross sections. The unit of all the elements of the matrix is nb$^2$.

Covariance matrix, corresponding to the total uncertainties, obtained between the leading jet $p_T$ intervals of the $b \bar{b}$-dijet differential cross sections. The unit of all the elements of the matrix is (nb GeV$/c)^2$ and the $p_T$ intervals are given in GeV$/c$.

Covariance matrix, corresponding to the total uncertainties, obtained between the leading jet $p_T$ intervals of the $c \bar{c}$-dijet differential cross sections. The unit of all the elements of the matrix is (nb GeV$/c)^2$ and the $p_T$ intervals are given in GeV$/$c .

Covariance matrix, corresponding to the total uncertainties, obtained between the leading jet $p_T$ intervals of the $b \bar{b}$ (horizontal) and $c \bar{c}$ (vertical) differential cross sections. The unit of all the elements of the matrix is (nb GeV$/c)^2$ and the $p_T$ intervals are given in GeV$/c$.

Covariance matrix, corresponding to the total uncertainties, obtained between the $m_{jj}$ intervals of the $b \bar{b}$-dijet differential cross sections. The unit of all the elements of the matrix is (nb GeV$/c^2)^2$ and the mass intervals are given in GeV$/c^2$.

Covariance matrix, corresponding to the total uncertainties, obtained between the $m_{jj}$ intervals of the $c \bar{c}$-dijet differential cross sections. The unit of all the elements of the matrix is (nb GeV$/c^2)^2$ and the mass intervals are given in GeV$/c^2$.

Covariance matrix, corresponding to the total uncertainties, obtained between the $m_{jj}$ intervals of the $b \bar{b}$ (horizontal) and $c \bar{c}$ (vertical) differential cross sections. The unit of all the elements of the matrix is $($nb GeV$/c^2)^2$ and the mass intervals are given in GeV$/c^2$.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 1.5 <= y* < 2.0 and jet radius parameter R = 0.4. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 2.0 <= y* < 2.5 and jet radius parameter R = 0.4. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 2.5 <= y* < 3.0 and jet radius parameter R = 0.4. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 0.0 <= y* < 0.5 and jet radius parameter R = 0.6. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 0.5 <= y* < 1.0 and jet radius parameter R = 0.6. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 1.0 <= y* < 1.5 and jet radius parameter R = 0.6. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 1.5 <= y* < 2.0 and jet radius parameter R = 0.6. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 2.0 <= y* < 2.5 and jet radius parameter R = 0.6. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 2.5 <= y* < 3.0 and jet radius parameter R = 0.6. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets having a rapidity difference in the range [4,5], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets having a rapidity difference in the range [5,6], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [90,120] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [150,180] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [180,210] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [240,270] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [2,3]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [4,5]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [2,3]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [4,5]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [2,3]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the dijet veto energy, Q0, for boundary jets having a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240} GeV and rapidity difference in the range [4,5]. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [90,120] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [150,180] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [180,210] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The Gap Fraction as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [240,270] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets in the gap as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a rapidity difference in the range [1,2], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets in the gap as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a rapidity difference in the range [2,3], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets in the gap as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a rapidity difference in the range [3,4], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets in the gap as a function of the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a rapidity difference in the range [4,5], using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [90,120] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [150,180] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [180,210] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [240,270] GeV . Data are shown for the dijet Forward/Backward selection with a dijet veto energy, Q0, set equal to the mean transverse momentum of the boundary jets.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [70,90] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [90,120] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [120,150] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [150,180] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [180,210] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [210,240] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

The mean number of jets as a function of the rapidity difference between the two boundary jets for boundary jets that have a mean transverse momentum in the range [240,270] GeV, using a jet veto Q0 = 20 GeV. Data are shown for two dijet selections: (i) the dijet system is defined as the two leading-pT jets in the event (ii) the dijet system is defined as the most forward-backward jets in the event.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 1.2-2.1 and R=0.4.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 2.1-2.8 and R=0.4.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 2.8-3.6 and R=0.4.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 3.6-4.4 and R=0.4.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 0.0-0.3 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 0.3-0.8 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 0.8-1.2 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 1.2-2.1 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 2.1-2.8 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 2.8-3.6 and R=0.6.

Inclusive jet PT distribution for the |y| range 3.6-4.4 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 0.0-0.5 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 0.5-1.0 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 1.0-1.5 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 1.5-2.0 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 2.0-2.5 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 2.5-3.0 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 3.0-3.5 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 3.5-4.0 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 4.0-4.4 and R=0.4.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 0.0-0.5 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 0.5-1.0 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 1.0-1.5 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 1.5-2.0 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 2.0-2.5 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 2.5-3.0 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 3.0-3.5 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 3.5-4.0 and R=0.6.

Dijet Mass distribution for the |y*| range 4.0-4.4 and R=0.6.