'The relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of collision energy for the 0-5\% centrality bin'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of collision energy for the 0-5\% centrality bin'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of collision energy for the 0-5\% centrality bin'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of collision energy for the 0-5\% centrality bin'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of collision energy for the 0-5\% centrality bin'

Summary of the measured values of $ d\sigma / d{m}$ (pb/GeV) in the dielectron channel with the statistical ($\delta_{\text{stat}}$), experimental ($\delta_{\text{exp}}$) and theoretical ($\delta_{\text{theo}}$) uncertainties, respectively. Here, $\delta_{\text{tot}}$ is the quadratic sum of the three components.

Summary of the measured values of fiducial $ d\sigma / d{m}$ (pb/GeV) (with no FSR correction applied) in the dimuon channel with the statistical ($\delta_{\text{stat}}$) and experimental ($\delta_{\text{exp}}$) uncertainties shown separately. Here, $\delta_{\text{tot}}$ is the quadratic sum of the two components.

of the measured values of fiducial $ d\sigma / d{m}$ (pb/GeV) (with no FSR correction applied) in the dielectron channel with the statistical ($\delta_{\text{stat}}$) and experimental ($\delta_{\text{exp}}$) uncertainties shown separately. Here, $\delta_{\text{tot}}$ is the quadratic sum of the two components.

Summary of the combined values of $ d\sigma / d{m}$ (pb/GeV) using the results from both the dimuon and dielectron channels. Here, $\delta_{\text{tot}}$ is the quadratic sum of the statistical, experimental and theoretical uncertainties.

Covariance matrix of the Drell-Yan differential cross section as a function of the dimuon invariant mass, measured in the full phase space, with FSR correction is applied. Luminosity uncertainty is not included in the covariance.

Covariance matrix of the Drell-Yan differential cross section as a function of the dielectron invariant mass, measured in the full phase space, with FSR correction is applied. Luminosity uncertainty is not included in the covariance.

Covariance matrix of the differential DY cross section measured for the combination of the two channels in the full phase space.

Dilepton exclusion limits at 95% CL on the CI scale (Lambda) for the six CI models considered for the muon channel. The limits are obtained for m > 400(2200) GeV in the case of constructive (destructive) interference.

Combined dilepton 95% CL exclusion limits on the cross section for the left-left constructive CI model. The red curve in the left plot shows the theoretical cross section as a function of the CI Scale Lambda.

Combined dilepton 95% CL exclusion limits on the CI scale (Lambda) for the six different CI models considered. Thelimits are obtained for m > 400(2200) GeV in the case of constructive (destructive) interference.

Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the UV cutoff for the electron channel with m> 1.8 TeV in the GRW, Hewett, and HLZ conventions for the ADD model. Signal model cross sections are calculated up to leading order and a correction factor of 1.3 is applied.

Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the UV cutoff for the muon channel with m> 1.8 TeV in the GRW, Hewett, and HLZ conventions for the ADD model. Signal model cross sections are calculated up to leading order and a correction factor of 1.3 is applied.

Combined dilepton 95% CL exclusion limit on the cross section in the GRW convention with m > 1.8 TeV for the ADD model.

Combined dilepton 95% CL exclusion limits on the UV cutoff with m> 1.8 TeV in the GRW, Hewett, and HLZ conventions for the ADD model. Signal model cross sections are calculated up to leading order and a correction factor of 1.3 is applied.

Individual and combined dilepton (this analysis) and diphoton 95% CL expected exclusion limits as a summary of all parameter conventions for the ADD model. Signal model cross sections are calculated up to leading order.

Individual and combined dilepton (this analysis) and diphoton 95% CL observed exclusion limits as a summary of all parameter conventions for the ADD model. Signal model cross sections are calculated up to leading order.

$D^0$ spectra in pp collisions

$D^0$ (in terms of (D0 +D0)/2)) spectra in pp collisions

$D^0$ (in terms of (D0 +D0)/2)) spectra in pp collisions. Note, the $\sigma_{NSD}$ = 30 $m$b for p+p was used in the calculations.

Integrated $D^0$ cross section per nucleon-nucleon collision at mid-rapidity for $p_T >0$ (a) and $p_T >4$ GeV/c (b) as a function of centrality $N_{part}$. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as error bars and brackets on the data points. The green boxes on the data points depict the overall normalization uncertainties in p+p and Au+Au data respectively.

Integrated $D^0$ cross section per nucleon-nucleon collision at mid-rapidity for $p_T >0$ (a) and $p_T >4$ GeV/c (b) as a function of centrality $N_{part}$. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as error bars and brackets on the data points. The green boxes on the data points depict the overall normalization uncertainties in p+p and Au+Au data respectively.

Integrated $D^0$ cross section per nucleon-nucleon collision at mid-rapidity for $p_T >0$ (a) and $p_T >4$ GeV/c (b) as a function of centrality $N_{part}$. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as error bars and brackets on the data points. The green boxes on the data points depict the overall normalization uncertainties in p+p and Au+Au data respectively.

Integrated $D^0$ cross section per nucleon-nucleon collision at mid-rapidity for $p_T >0$ (a) and $p_T >4$ GeV/c (b) as a function of centrality $N_{part}$. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as error bars and brackets on the data points. The green boxes on the data points depict the overall normalization uncertainties in p+p and Au+Au data respectively.

Integrated $D^0$ cross section per nucleon-nucleon collision at mid-rapidity for $p_T >0$ (a) and $p_T >4$ GeV/c (b) as a function of centrality $N_{part}$. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as error bars and brackets on the data points. The green boxes on the data points depict the overall normalization uncertainties in p+p and Au+Au data respectively.

Integrated $D^0$ cross section per nucleon-nucleon collision at mid-rapidity for $p_T >0$ (a) and $p_T >4$ GeV/c (b) as a function of centrality $N_{part}$. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as error bars and brackets on the data points. The green boxes on the data points depict the overall normalization uncertainties in p+p and Au+Au data respectively.

$D^0$ $R_{AA}$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} =200$ GeV for $0-10\%$ (a), $10-40\%$ (b) and $40-80\%$ (c) centrality bins, respectively. The first two and last two data points are presented as empty circles, indicating that the p+p reference is extrapolated into these $p_T$ ranges. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as error bars and brackets on the data points. The light and dark green boxes on the right depict the normalization uncertainties in determining the $N_{bin}$ in Au+Au collisions and the total inelastic cross section in p+p collisions, respectively.

$D^0$ $R_{AA}$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} =200$ GeV for $0-10\%$ (a), $10-40\%$ (b) and $40-80\%$ (c) centrality bins, respectively. The first two and last two data points are presented as empty circles, indicating that the p+p reference is extrapolated into these $p_T$ ranges. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as error bars and brackets on the data points. The light and dark green boxes on the right depict the normalization uncertainties in determining the $N_{bin}$ in Au+Au collisions and the total inelastic cross section in p+p collisions, respectively.

$D^0$ $R_{AA}$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} =200$ GeV for $0-10\%$ (a), $10-40\%$ (b) and $40-80\%$ (c) centrality bins, respectively. The first two and last two data points are presented as empty circles, indicating that the p+p reference is extrapolated into these $p_T$ ranges. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as error bars and brackets on the data points. The light and dark green boxes on the right depict the normalization uncertainties in determining the $N_{bin}$ in Au+Au collisions and the total inelastic cross section in p+p collisions, respectively.

$D^0$ and $\bar{D}^0$ invariant yields at mid-rapidity $(|y|<1)$ vs transverse momentum for different centrality classes. Error bars indicate statistical uncertainties and brackets depict systematic uncertainties. Global systematic uncertainties in B.R. and $N_{bin}$ are not plotted. Solid lines depict Levy function fits.

$D^0$ and $\bar{D}^0$ invariant yields at mid-rapidity $(|y|<1)$ vs transverse momentum for different centrality classes. Error bars indicate statistical uncertainties and brackets depict systematic uncertainties. Global systematic uncertainties in B.R. and $N_{bin}$ are not plotted. Solid lines depict Levy function fits.

$D^0$ and $\bar{D}^0$ invariant yields at mid-rapidity $(|y|<1)$ vs transverse momentum for different centrality classes. Error bars indicate statistical uncertainties and brackets depict systematic uncertainties. Global systematic uncertainties in B.R. and $N_{bin}$ are not plotted. Solid lines depict Levy function fits.

$\bar{D}^0/D^0$ invariant yield ratio at mid-rapidity $(|y|<1)$ vs transverse momentum for different centrality classes. Error bars indicate statistical uncertainties and brackets depict systematic uncertainties. Dashed lines depict constant function fits to the $\bar{D}^0/D^0$ ratios.

$\bar{D}^0/D^0$ invariant yield ratio at mid-rapidity $(|y|<1)$ vs transverse momentum for different centrality classes. Error bars indicate statistical uncertainties and brackets depict systematic uncertainties. Dashed lines depict constant function fits to the $\bar{D}^0/D^0$ ratios.

$\bar{D}^0/D^0$ invariant yield ratio at mid-rapidity $(|y|<1)$ vs transverse momentum for different centrality classes. Error bars indicate statistical uncertainties and brackets depict systematic uncertainties. Dashed lines depict constant function fits to the $\bar{D}^0/D^0$ ratios.

$D_0$ $R_{CP}$ with the $60-80\%$ spectrum as the reference for different centrality classes compared to the LBT model calculations shown by dashed lines [48, 49].

$D_0$ $R_{CP}$ with the $60-80\%$ spectrum as the reference for different centrality classes compared to the LBT model calculations shown by dashed lines [48, 49].

$D_0$ $R_{CP}$ with the $60-80\%$ spectrum as the reference for different centrality classes compared to the LBT model calculations shown by dashed lines [48, 49].

$D^0$ $R_{CP}$ with the $40-60\%$ spectrum as the reference for different centrality classes compared to model calculations from LBT (black dotted lines) and the Duke (blue dashedlines) groups [48-50].

$D^0$ $R_{CP}$ with the $40-60\%$ spectrum as the reference for different centrality classes compared to model calculations from LBT (black dotted lines) and the Duke (blue dashedlines) groups [48-50].

$D^0$ $R_{CP}$ with the $40-60\%$ spectrum as the reference for different centrality classes compared to model calculations from LBT (black dotted lines) and the Duke (blue dashedlines) groups [48-50].

BW fit parameters for $D^0$

BW fit parameters for $D^0$

BW fit parameters for $D^0$

$D^0$ invariant yield at mid-rapidity $(|y|<1)$ vs transverse kinetic energy ($m_T -m_0$) for different centrality classes. Error bars indicate statistical uncertainties and brackets depict systematic uncertainties. Global systematic uncertainties in B.R. are not plotted. Solid and dashed black lines depict exponential function fits and the dot-dashed line depicts a power-law function fit to the spectrum in the $60-80\%$ centrality bin.

$D^0$ invariant yield at mid-rapidity $(|y|<1)$ vs transverse kinetic energy ($m_T -m_0$) for different centrality classes. Error bars indicate statistical uncertainties and brackets depict systematic uncertainties. Global systematic uncertainties in B.R. are not plotted. Solid and dashed black lines depict exponential function fits and the dot-dashed line depicts a power-law function fit to the spectrum in the $60-80\%$ centrality bin.

$D^0$ invariant yield at mid-rapidity $(|y|<1)$ vs transverse kinetic energy ($m_T -m_0$) for different centrality classes. Error bars indicate statistical uncertainties and brackets depict systematic uncertainties. Global systematic uncertainties in B.R. are not plotted. Solid and dashed black lines depict exponential function fits and the dot-dashed line depicts a power-law function fit to the spectrum in the $60-80\%$ centrality bin.

mT fit parameters Teff $D^0$

mT fit parameters Teff $D^0$

mT fit parameters Teff $D^0$

mT fit parameters Teff Jpsi

mT fit parameters Teff Jpsi

mT fit parameters Teff Jpsi

mT fit parameters Teff K

mT fit parameters Teff K

mT fit parameters Teff K

mT fit parameters Teff Lambda

mT fit parameters Teff Lambda

mT fit parameters Teff Lambda

mT fit parameters Teff Omega

mT fit parameters Teff Omega

mT fit parameters Teff Omega

mT fit parameters Teff p

mT fit parameters Teff p

mT fit parameters Teff p

mT fit parameters Teff phi

mT fit parameters Teff phi

mT fit parameters Teff phi

mT fit parameters Teff pi

mT fit parameters Teff pi

mT fit parameters Teff pi

mT fit parameters Teff Xi

mT fit parameters Teff Xi

mT fit parameters Teff Xi

Nbin and Npart for different centralities in AuAu collisions

Nbin and Npart for different centralities in AuAu collisions

Nbin and Npart for different centralities in AuAu collisions

Vertex resolution uncertainties for different centralities in Au+Au collisions (for $R_{CP}$ plot)

Vertex resolution uncertainties for different centralities in Au+Au collisions (for $R_{CP}$ plot)

Vertex resolution uncertainties for different centralities in Au+Au collisions (for $R_{CP}$ plot)

The $S_{\rm T}$ distribution for group D before fitting.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the $T\bar T$ cross section as a function of the T quark mass assuming Br(T → tZ) = 100%.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the $T\bar T$ cross section as a function of the T quark mass assuming Br(T → tZ) = B(T → tH) = 50%.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the $T\bar T$ cross section as a function of the T quark mass assuming Br(T → tZ) = B(T → bW) = 50%

The number of observed events and the predicted number of SM background events in the $T\bar T$ search using electron channel in the four event groups.

The number of observed events and the predicted number of SM background events in the $T\bar T$ search using muon channel in the four event groups.

The $S_{\rm T}$ distribution for 1b event category for data and the expected background before fitting.

The $S_{\rm T}$ distribution for 2b event category for data and the expected background.

The $S_{\rm T}$ distribution for boosted t event category for data and the expected background.

The $S_{\rm T}$ distribution for boosted H event category for data and the expected background.

The $S_{\rm T}$ distribution for boosted Z event category for data and the expected background.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the $B\bar B$ cross section as a function of the B quark mass assuming Br(B → bZ) = 100%.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the $B\bar B$ cross section as a function of the B quark mass assuming Br(B → bZ) = Br(B → bH) = 50%.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the $B\bar B$ cross section as a function of the B quark mass assuming Br(B → bZ) = Br(B → tW) = 50%

The number of observed events and the predicted number of SM background events in the $B\bar B$ search using electron channel in the five event categories.

The number of observed events and the predicted number of SM background events in the $B\bar B$ search using muon channel in the five event categories.

Higgs boson transverse momentum spectrum, $H\rightarrow b\overline{b}$

Combined Higgs boson transverse momentum spectrum, ggH only

Combined Higgs boson jet multiplicity spectrum

Higgs boson jet multiplicity spectrum, $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$

Higgs boson jet multiplicity spectrum, $H\rightarrow ZZ$

Combined Higgs boson rapidity spectrum

Higgs boson rapidity spectrum, $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$

Higgs boson rapidity spectrum, $H\rightarrow ZZ$

Combined leading jet transverse momentum spectrum

Leading jet transverse momentum spectrum, $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$

Leading jet transverse momentum spectrum, $H\rightarrow ZZ$

$E_T^e$ distributions of electron candidate events, background contributions, and sum of backgrounds and $W \rightarrow e\nu$ MC signal in the BEMC region for $-0.5 < \eta_e < 0$.

$E_T^e$ distributions of electron candidate events, background contributions, and sum of backgrounds and $W \rightarrow e\nu$ MC signal in the BEMC region for $0 < \eta_e < 0.5$.

$E_T^e$ distributions of electron candidate events, background contributions, and sum of backgrounds and $W \rightarrow e\nu$ MC signal in the BEMC region for $0.5 < \eta_e < 1.1$.

$E_T^e$ distributions of positron candidate events, background contributions, and sum of backgrounds and $W \rightarrow e\nu$ MC signal in the BEMC region for $-1.1 < \eta_e < -0.5$.

$E_T^e$ distributions of positron candidate events, background contributions, and sum of backgrounds and $W \rightarrow e\nu$ MC signal in the BEMC region for $-0.5 < \eta_e < 0$.

$E_T^e$ distributions of positron candidate events, background contributions, and sum of backgrounds and $W \rightarrow e\nu$ MC signal in the BEMC region for $0 < \eta_e < 0.5$.

$E_T^e$ distributions of positron candidate events, background contributions, and sum of backgrounds and $W \rightarrow e\nu$ MC signal in the BEMC region for $0.5 < \eta_e < 1.1$.

Signed $p_{T}$-balance distributions for electron candidate events, background contributions, and sum of backgrounds and $W \rightarrow e\nu$ MC signal in the EEMC region.

Signed $p_{T}$-balance distributions for positron candidate events, background contributions, and sum of backgrounds and $W \rightarrow e\nu$ MC signal in the EEMC region.

Longitudinal single-spin asymmetries, $A_L$, for $W^+$ production as a function of the positron pseudorapidity, $\eta_e$ for the STAR 2011+2012 data samples for 25 $< E_T^e <$ 50 GeV.

Longitudinal single-spin asymmetries, $A_L$, for $W^-$ production as a function of the electron pseudorapidity, $\eta_e$ for the STAR 2011+2012 data samples for 25 $< E_T^e <$ 50 GeV.

Longitudinal single-spin asymmetries, $A_L$, for $W^+$ production as a function of the positron pseudorapidity, $\eta_e$ for the STAR 2013 data samples for 25 $< E_T^e <$ 50 GeV.

Longitudinal single-spin asymmetries, $A_L$, for $W^-$ production as a function of the electron pseudorapidity, $\eta_e$ for the STAR 2013 data samples for 25 $< E_T^e <$ 50 GeV.

Longitudinal single-spin asymmetries, $A_L$, for $W^+$ production as a function of the lepton pseudorapidity, $\eta_e$ for the combined 2011+2012 and 2013 STAR data samples for 25 $< E_T^e <$ 50 GeV.

Longitudinal single-spin asymmetries, $A_L$, for $W^-$ production as a function of the lepton pseudorapidity, $\eta_e$ for the combined 2011+2012 and 2013 STAR data samples for 25 $< E_T^e <$ 50 GeV.

The difference of the light sea-quark polarizations $x(\Delta \bar{u} - \Delta \bar{d})$ as a function of $x$ at a scale $Q^2$ = 10 (GeV/c)$^2$. The table shows original NNPDFpol1.1 results, and NNPDFpol1.1rw presents the corresponding distribution after the 2013 $W$ data are included by reweighting.

NMSSM 95% CL upper limit on cross section times branching ratio

NMSSM 95% CL upper limit on cross section times branching ratio

NMSSM 95% CL upper limit on cross section times branching ratio

NMSSM 95% CL upper limit on cross section times branching ratio

90% CL upper limit on MSSMD kinetic mixing parameter epsilon

90% CL upper limit on MSSMD kinetic mixing parameter epsilon

90% CL upper limit on MSSMD kinetic mixing parameter epsilon

90% CL upper limit on MSSMD kinetic mixing parameter epsilon