MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) in PP collision

MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV.

The ratio of theory to data, for the ratio of the pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV. The total uncertainties on the data points are provided in the column entitled 'DATA UNCERTAINTIES'. The theory points are from the NLO pQCD calculations of DSSZ, EPS09, nCTEQ15, and EPPS16 nPDFs, using CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The ratio of theory to data, for the ratio of the pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV. The total uncertainties on the data points are provided in the column entitled 'DATA UNCERTAINTIES'. The theory points are from the NLO pQCD calculations of DSSZ, EPS09, nCTEQ15, and EPPS16 nPDFs, using CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

Polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\bar\Lambda$ as a function of $\eta$ for the $20\%–60\%$ centrality bin in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. Open boxes and vertical lines show systematic and statistical uncertainties. Note that the data points for Λ are slightly shifted for visibility.

Polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\bar\Lambda$ as a function of observed charge asymmetry $A_{ch}$ normalized with its RMS $\sigma_{A_{ch}}$ for the $20\%–60\%$ centrality bin in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. Open boxes and vertical lines show systematic and statistical uncertainties. Solid and dashed lines show linear fitting functions.

Global polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\bar{\Lambda}$ using the new $\alpha_\Lambda=0.732$ updated on PDG2020 as a function of the collision energy $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}$ for 20-50% centrality Au+Au collisions. Thin lines show calculations from a 3+1D cascade + viscous hydrodynamic model (UrQMD+vHLLE) and bold lines show the AMPT model calculations. In the case of each model, primary $\Lambda$ with and without the feed-down effect are indicated by dashed and solid lines, respectively. Open boxes and vertical lines show systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively. Note that the data points at 200 GeV and for $\bar{\Lambda}$ are slightly horizontally shifted for visibility.

$\Lambda$ ($\bar\Lambda$) polarization using the new $\alpha_\Lambda=0.732$ updated on PDG2020 as a function of the collision centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. Open boxes and vertical lines show systematic and statistical uncertainties. The data points for Λ are slightly shifted for visibility.

Polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\bar\Lambda$ using the new $\alpha_\Lambda=0.732$ updated on PDG2020 as a function of $p_{T}$ for the $20\%–60\%$ centrality bin in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. Open boxes and vertical lines show systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively. Hydrodynamic model calculations for Λ with two different initial conditions (IC) are compared. Note that the data points for Λ are slightly shifted for visibility.

Polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\bar\Lambda$ using the new $\alpha_\Lambda=0.732$ updated on PDG2020 as a function of $\eta$ for the $20\%–60\%$ centrality bin in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. Open boxes and vertical lines show systematic and statistical uncertainties. Note that the data points for Λ are slightly shifted for visibility.

Polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\bar\Lambda$ using the new $\alpha_\Lambda=0.732$ updated on PDG2020 as a function of observed charge asymmetry $A_{ch}$ normalized with its RMS $\sigma_{A_{ch}}$ for the $20\%–60\%$ centrality bin in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. Open boxes and vertical lines show systematic and statistical uncertainties. Solid and dashed lines show linear fitting functions.

$\pi^0$ spectra from figure 3a from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ spectra from figure 3a from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ spectra from figure 3a from 40-60% semi-peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ spectra supplemental to figure 3a from 60-90% peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

Ratio of $\pi^0$ spectra from the PbSc to the combined spectra from figure 3b from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\pi^0$ spectra from the PbGl to the combined spectra from figure 3b from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\pi^0$ spectra from the PbSc to the combined spectra from figure 3c from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\pi^0$ spectra from the PbGl to the combined spectra from figure 3c from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\pi^0$ spectra from the PbSc to the combined spectra from figure 3d from 40-60% semi-peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\pi^0$ spectra from the PbGl to the combined spectra from figure 3d from 40-60% semi-peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

$\eta$ spectra from figure 3e from minimum bias Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ spectra from figure 3e from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ spectra from figure 3e from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ spectra from figure 3e from 40-60% semi-peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ spectra supplemental to figure 3e from 60-90% peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

Ratio of $\eta$ spectra from the PbSc to the combined spectra from figure 3f from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\eta$ spectra from the PbGl to the combined spectra from figure 3f from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\eta$ spectra from the PbSc to the combined spectra from figure 3g from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\eta$ spectra from the PbGl to the combined spectra from figure 3g from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\eta$ spectra from the PbSc to the combined spectra from figure 3h from 40-60% semi-peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\eta$ spectra from the PbGl to the combined spectra from figure 3h from 40-60% semi-peripheral Au+Cu collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

$\eta/\pi^0$ ratio from figure 4 from minimum bias Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point.

$\eta/\pi^0$ ratio from figure 4 from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point.

$\eta/\pi^0$ ratio from figure 4 from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point.

$\eta/\pi^0$ ratio from figure 4 from 40-60% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point.

$\eta/\pi^0$ ratio supplemental to figure 4 from 60-90% peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5a from 0-10% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5b from 10-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5c from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5a from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5d from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5b from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5e from 40-60% semi-peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5c from 40-60% semi-peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5f from minimum bias Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5f from minimum bias Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ supplemental to figure 5 from 60-90% peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ $R_{AB}$ supplemental to figure 5 from 60-90% peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ supplemental to figure 6a from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ supplemental to figure 6b from 0-10% central Cu+Cu collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ supplemental to figure 6b from 40-50% semi-central Au+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ for $p_T>5$ GeV/$c$ in Cu+Au collisions as a function of centrality from figure 7a. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ for $p_T>5$ GeV/$c$ in Au+Au collisions as a function of centrality from figure 7a. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ for $p_T>10$ GeV/$c$ in Cu+Au collisions as a function of centrality from figure 7b. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ for $p_T>10$ GeV/$c$ in Au+Au collisions as a function of centrality from figure 7b. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

Rapidity dependence of $R_{\mathrm{pPb}}$ for prompt $\psi$(2S) mesons at $\sqrt(s_{\textrm{NN}})=5.02 $ TeV, in three $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges. The fully correlated global uncertainty of 4.2% is not included in the point-by-point uncertainty.

Transverse momentum dependence of $R_{\mathrm{pPb}}$ for prompt $\psi$(2S) mesons at $\sqrt(s_{\textrm{NN}})=5.02 $ TeV, in seven $y_{\mathrm{CM}}$ ranges. The fully correlated global uncertainty of 4.2% is not incuded in the point-by-point uncertainty.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, for $D^{0}$ mesons as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $D^{0}$ mesons as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $D^{0}$ meson as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $D^{0}$ meson as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.