Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions from Lattice QCD Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations for net-baryon.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations for net-proton (No Decay).

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are STAR data.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are from UrQMD net-proton.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are from AMPT default net-proton.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are from AMPT String Melting net-proton.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are from Therminator net-proton.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are from Hijing net-proton.

Fig. 2. (Color online.) Event-by-event photon multiplicity distributions (solid circles) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV} .$ The distributions for top $0-5 \%$ central $\mathrm{Au}+$ Au collisions and top $0-10 \%$ central $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions are also shown (open circles). The photon multiplicity distributions for central collisions are observed to be Gaussian (solid line). Only statistical errors are shown. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 2. (Color online.) Event-by-event photon multiplicity distributions (solid circles) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV} .$ The distributions for top $0-5 \%$ central $\mathrm{Au}+$ Au collisions and top $0-10 \%$ central $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions are also shown (open circles). The photon multiplicity distributions for central collisions are observed to be Gaussian (solid line). Only statistical errors are shown. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 2. (Color online.) Event-by-event photon multiplicity distributions (solid circles) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV} .$ The distributions for top $0-5 \%$ central $\mathrm{Au}+$ Au collisions and top $0-10 \%$ central $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions are also shown (open circles). The photon multiplicity distributions for central collisions are observed to be Gaussian (solid line). Only statistical errors are shown. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several centrality classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several centrality classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several centrality classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 4. (Color online.) Top panel: The number of photons divided by $\left\langle N_{\text{part}}\right\rangle / 2$ as a function of average number of participating nucleons for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s} _{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ for $-3.7<\eta<-2.3 .$ Errors shown are systematic only and include those for $\left\langle N_{\text {part }}\right\rangle .$ Results from HIJING are shown as lines (solid for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and dashed for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ ). Bottom panel: Same as above, for both photons and charged particles from PHOBOS [10]. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 4. (Color online.) Top panel: The number of photons divided by $\left\langle N_{\text{part}}\right\rangle / 2$ as a function of average number of participating nucleons for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s} _{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ for $-3.7<\eta<-2.3 .$ Errors shown are systematic only and include those for $\left\langle N_{\text {part }}\right\rangle .$ Results from HIJING are shown as lines (solid for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and dashed for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ ). Bottom panel: Same as above, for both photons and charged particles from PHOBOS [10]. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 5. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions normalized by the average number of participating nucleon pairs for different collision centralities are plotted as a function of pseudorapidity shifted by the beam rapidity (-5.36 for $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ and -4.19 for $62.4 \mathrm{GeV}$ ) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$. Errors are systematic only, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. For clarity of presentation, results for only four centralities are shown. The $\mathrm{Cu}+$ Cu data are shifted by 0.1 unit in $\eta-y_{\text {beam }} .$ The solid line is a second order polynomial fit to the data (see text for details).

Fig. 5. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions normalized by the average number of participating nucleon pairs for different collision centralities are plotted as a function of pseudorapidity shifted by the beam rapidity (-5.36 for $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ and -4.19 for $62.4 \mathrm{GeV}$ ) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$. Errors are systematic only, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. For clarity of presentation, results for only four centralities are shown. The $\mathrm{Cu}+$ Cu data are shifted by 0.1 unit in $\eta-y_{\text {beam }} .$ The solid line is a second order polynomial fit to the data (see text for details).

Inclusive jet cross section DSIG/DETARAP for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1995-1997 data sample.

Inclusive jet cross section DSIG/DETARAP for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1999-2000 data sample.

Inclusive jet cross section DSIG/DETARAP for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the combined data sample.

Inclusive jet cross section DSIG/DET for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1995-1997 running period.

Inclusive jet cross section DSIG/DET for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1999-2000 running period.

Inclusive jet cross section DSIG/DET for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the combined running period.

Inclusive di-jet cross section DSIG/DQ**2 for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1995-1997 data sample.

Inclusive di-jet cross section DSIG/DQ**2 for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1999-2000 data sample.

Inclusive di-jet cross section DSIG/DQ**2 for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the combined data sample.

Inclusive di-jet cross section DSIG/DM for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1995-1997 sample.

Inclusive di-jet cross section DSIG/DM for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the 1999-2000 sample.

Inclusive di-jet cross section DSIG/DM for jets in the lab. frame. Data from the combined sample.

Mean subjet multiplicity as a function of the YCUT parameter used in defining the jet for the inclusive jet sample with ET 14 to 17 GeV and 17 to 21 GeV.

Mean subjet multiplicity as a function of the YCUT parameter used in defining the jet for the inclusive jet sample with ET 21 to 25 GeV and 25 to 35 GeV.

Mean subjet multiplicity as a function of the YCUT parameter used in defining the jet for the inclusive jet sample with ET 35 to 55 GeV and 55 to 119 GeV.

Measured values of the mean subjet multiplicity at YCUT = 0.01 as a function of Q**2.

Value of ALPHAS at the Z0 mass obtained from the data with ET(C=JET) > 25 GeV.. The second DSYS error is due to the uncertainty in the theory.

Jet flavor tagging is used. (C=DUSCB), (C=DUSC), (C=UDS) mean quark-jet flavors. CONST(C=GLUON/JET) is the ratio gluon/jet for all charged particles. 'Y' events, mirror symmetric events, the angle between the most energetic jet and other two jets is 150 +- 15 deg.

Jet flavor tagging is used. (C=DUSCB), (C=DUSC), (C=UDS) mean quark-jet flavors. CONST(C=GLUON/JET) is the ratio gluon/jet for all charged particles. 'Mercedes' events, three-fold symmetric events, the angle between three jets is 120 +- 15 deg.

Jet flavor tagging is used. (C=DUSCB), (C=DUSC), (C=UDS) mean quark-jet flavors. CONST(C=GLUON/JET) is the ratio gluon/jet for all charged particles. 'Mercedes' events, three-fold symmetric events, the angle between three jets is 120 +- 15 deg.

Jet flavor tagging is used. (C=DUSCB), (C=DUSC), (C=UDS) mean quark-jet flavors. CONST(C=GLUON/JET) is the ratio gluon/jet for all charged particles. 'Mercedes' events, three-fold symmetric events, the angle between three jets is 120 +- 15 deg.

Jet flavor tagging is used. (C=DUSCB), (C=DUSC), (C=UDS) mean quark-jet flavors. CONST(C=GLUON/JET) is the ratio gluon/jet for all charged particles. 'Mercedes' events, three-fold symmetric events, the angle between three jets is 120 +- 15 deg.

Jet flavor tagging is used. 'Y' events, mirror symmetric events, the angle between the most energetic jet and other two jets is 150 +- 15 deg.. CONST(NAME=XISTAR) is maximum of log(P(C=CHARGED)/P(C=JET)) distribution.

Jet flavor tagging is used. 'Mercedes' events, three-fold symmetric events, the angle between three jets is 120 +- 15 deg.. CONST(NAME=XISTAR) is maximum of log(P(C=CHARGED)/P(C=JET)) distribution.

No description provided.

Normalised PI+- production rates in Z0-->Q-QBAR events.

Normalised K+- production rates in Z0-->Q-QBAR events.

Normalised P PBAR production rates in Z0-->Q-QBAR events.

Normalised Heavy Particle (P and K) production rates in Z0-->Q-QBAR events.

Normalised PI+- production rates in Z0-->B-BBAR events.

Normalised K+- production rates in Z0-->B-BBAR events.

Normalised P PBAR production rates in Z0-->B-BBAR events.

Normalised Heavy Particle (P and K) production rates in Z0-->B-BBAR events.

Normalised PI+- production rates in Z0-->(U-UBAR,D-DBAR,S-SBAR) events.

Normalised K+- production rates in Z0-->(U-UBAR,D-DBAR,S-SBAR) events.

Normalised P PBAR production rates in Z0-->(U-UBAR,D-DBAR,S-SBAR) events.

Normalised Heavy Particle (K and P) production rates in Z0-->(U-UBAR,D-DBAR,S-SBAR) events.

Differential cross section for charged particles in Z0 -->Q-QBAR events.

Differential cross section for charged particles in Z0 -->Q-QBAR events.

Differential cross section for PI+- in Z0-->Q-QBAR events.

Differential cross section for PI+- in Z0-->Q-QBAR events.

Differential cross section for K+- in Z0-->Q-QBAR events.

Differential cross section for K+- in Z0-->Q-QBAR events.

Differential cross section for P PBAR in Z0-->Q-QBAR events.

Differential cross section for P PBAR in Z0-->Q-QBAR events.

Differential cross section for charged particles in Z0 -->B-BBAR events.

Differential cross section for charged particles in Z0 -->B-BBAR events.

Differential cross section for PI+- in Z0-->B-BBAR events.

Differential cross section for PI+- in Z0-->B-BBAR events.

Differential cross section for K+- in Z0-->B-BBAR events.

Differential cross section for K+- in Z0-->B-BBAR events.

Differential cross section for P PBAR in Z0-->B-BBAR events.

Differential cross section for P PBAR in Z0-->B-BBAR events.

Differential cross section for charged particles in Z0-->(U-UBAR,D-DBAR,S-SBAR) events.

Differential cross section for charged particles in Z0-->(U-UBAR,D-DBAR,S-SBAR) events.

Differential cross section for PI+- in Z0-->(U-UBAR,D-DBAR,S-SBAR) events.

Differential cross section for PI+- in Z0-->(U-UBAR,D-DBAR,S-SBAR) events.

Differential cross section for K+- in Z0-->(U-UBAR,D-DBAR,S-SBAR) events.

Differential cross section for K+- in Z0-->(U-UBAR,D-DBAR,S-SBAR) events.

Differential cross section for P PBAR in Z0-->(U-UBAR,D-DBAR,S-SBAR) events.

No description provided.

Scaled energy distribution of charged hadrons produced in Gluon jets in 'Mercedes' topology 3-JET events.

Subjet multiplicity-1 as a function of the jet resolution parameter ycut for Quark jets in 'Y' topology events.

Subjet multiplicity-1 as a function of the jet resolution parameter ycut for Gluon jets in 'Y' topology events.

Ratio of the sub-jet multiplicity-1 for gluon jets to the sub-jet multiplicity-1 for quark jets as a function of the jet resolution parameter ycut in 'Y' topology events.

Total 1-jet rate for Quark jets as a function of the jet resolution parameter ycut in 'Y' topology events.

Total 1-jet rate for Gluon jets as a function of the jet resolution parameter ycut in 'Y' topology events.

Differential 1-jet rate for Quark jets as a function of the jet resolution parameter ycut in 'Y' topology events.

Differential 1-jet rate for Gluon jets as a function of the jet resolution parameter ycut in 'Y' topology events.

Splitting Function for Quark jets as a function of the jet resolution parameter ycut in 'Y' topology events.

Splitting Function for Gluon jets as a function of the jet resolution parameter ycut in 'Y' topology events.

Ratio of Splitting Functions for Gluon jets and Quark jets as a function ofthe jet resolution parameter ycut in 'Y' topology events.

Normalised inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons in different intervals of W and Q**2 with corresponding values of X(Bjorken). Additional systematic error of 4 PCT.

Normalised inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons in different intervals of W and Q**2 with corresponding values of X(Bjorken). Additional systematic error of 4 PCT.

Normalised inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons in different intervals of W and Q**2 with corresponding values of X(Bjorken). Additional systematic error of 4 PCT.

Normalised inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons in different intervals of W and Q**2 with corresponding values of X(Bjorken). Additional systematic error of 4 PCT.

Normalised inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons in different intervals of W and Q**2 with corresponding values of X(Bjorken). Additional systematic error of 4 PCT.

Normalised inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons in different intervals of W and Q**2 with corresponding values of X(Bjorken). Additional systematic error of 4 PCT.

Normalised inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons in different intervals of W and Q**2 with corresponding values of X(Bjorken). Additional systematic error of 4 PCT.

Normalised inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons in different intervals of W and Q**2 with corresponding values of X(Bjorken). Additional systematic error of 4 PCT.

Normalised inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons in different intervals of W and Q**2 with corresponding values of X(Bjorken). Additional systematic error of 4 PCT.

Additional inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons as a function of XL and PT**2 in different intervals of W. Additional systematic error 4 PCT.

Additional inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons as a function of XL and PT**2 in different intervals of W. Additional systematic error 4 PCT.

Additional inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons as a function of XL and PT**2 in different intervals of W. Additional systematic error 4 PCT.

Additional inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons as a function of XL and PT**2 in different intervals of W. Additional systematic error 4 PCT.

Additional inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons as a function of XL and PT**2 in different intervals of W. Additional systematic error 4 PCT.

Additional inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons as a function of XL and PT**2 in different intervals of W. Additional systematic error 4 PCT.

Normalised inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons as a function of XL and PT**2 in different intervals of Q**2. Additional systematic error 4 PCT.

Normalised inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons as a function of XL and PT**2 in different intervals of Q**2. Additional systematic error 4 PCT.

Normalised inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons as a function of XL and PT**2 in different intervals of Q**2. Additional systematic error 4 PCT.

Normalised inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons as a function of XL and PT**2 in different intervals of Q**2. Additional systematic error 4 PCT.

Normalised inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons as a function of XL and PT**2 in different intervals of Q**2. Additional systematic error 4 PCT.

Normalised inclusive single-particle distributions of charged hadrons as a function of XL and PT**2 in different intervals of Q**2. Additional systematic error 4 PCT.

Mean values of PT**2 in different XL intervals in different regions of W**2. Additional systematic error 2 PCT.

Mean values of PT**2 in different XL intervals in different Q**2 regions. Additional systematic error 2 PCT.

Mean value of PT**2 in different XL intervals in different intervals of W**2 and Q**2. Corresponding values of X(Bjorken) as shown. Additional systematic error 2 PCT.

Mean value of PT**2 in different XL intervals in different intervals of W**2 and Q**2. Corresponding values of X(Bjorken) as shown. Additional systematic error 2 PCT.

Mean value of PT**2 in different XL intervals in different intervals of W**2 and Q**2. Corresponding values of X(Bjorken) as shown. Additional systematic error 2 PCT.

Mean value of PT**2 in different XL intervals in different intervals of W**2 and Q**2. Corresponding values of X(Bjorken) as shown. Additional systematic error 2 PCT.

Mean value of PT**2 in different XL intervals in different intervals of W**2 and Q**2. Corresponding values of X(Bjorken) as shown. Additional systematic error 2 PCT.

Mean value of PT**2 in different XL intervals in different intervals of W**2 and Q**2. Corresponding values of X(Bjorken) as shown. Additional systematic error 2 PCT.

Average forward multipicities for positive, negative and all charged hadrons. Additional systematic error 1 PCT.

Average forward multipicities for positive, negative and all charged hadrons. Additional systematic error 1 PCT.

Average forward multipicities for positive, negative and all charged hadrons. Additional systematic error 1 PCT.

(Transverse + longitudinal) components of the differential cross section.

No description provided.

Ratio of the longitudinal to the transverse component of the fragmentation function.

Transverse and longitudinal components of the differential cross section.

Transverse and longitudinal componentS of the differential cross section.

No description provided.