Comparison of the measured data to the expected $p_\text{T}(\ell^+\nu b)$ distributions estimated from MC simulation in the $\ell^+$ SR. The background scale factors are applied and only the central values are given.

Comparison of the measured data to the expected $p_\text{T}(\ell^-\nu b)$ distributions estimated from MC simulation in the $\ell^-$ SR. The background scale factors are applied and only the central values are given.

Comparison of the measured data to the expected $|y(\ell^+\nu b)|$ distributions estimated from MC simulation in the $\ell^+$ SR. The background scale factors are applied and only the central values are given.

Comparison of the measured data to the expected $|y(\ell^-\nu b)|$ distributions estimated from MC simulation in the $\ell^-$ SR. The background scale factors are applied and only the central values are given.

Summary of the uncertainties on the absolute differential $tq$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $p_\text{T}(t)$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the absolute differential $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the absolute differential $tq$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $|y(t)|$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the absolute differential $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(\bar{t})|$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the ratio of the absolute differential $tq$ and $\bar{t}q$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $p_\text{T}(t\ \text{or}\ \bar{t})$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the ratio of the absolute differential $tq$ and $\bar{t}q$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $|y(t\ \text{or}\ \bar{t})|$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the normalised differential $tq$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $p_\text{T}(t)$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the normalised differential $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the normalised differential $tq$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $|y(t)|$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the normalised differential $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(\bar{t})|$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Absolute unfolded differential $tq$ cross-section $p_\text{T}(t)$. The shaded band indicates the total measurement uncertainty. For the sake of brevity, all theory predictions are added to this table. The attached plot shows the MCFM predictions only. The cross-section is compared to the theoretical predictions from FO calculations done with MCFM at LO, NLO and NNLO, predictions obtained with Powheg+Pythia8 with different PDF sets and predictions from different MC event generators and parton shower programs with the NNPDF3.0 PDF set.

Absolute unfolded differential $\bar{t}q$ cross-section $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$. The shaded band indicates the total measurement uncertainty. For the sake of brevity, all theory predictions are added to this table. The attached plot shows the MCFM predictions only. The cross-section is compared to the theoretical predictions from FO calculations done with MCFM at LO, NLO and NNLO, predictions obtained with Powheg+Pythia8 with different PDF sets and predictions from different MC event generators and parton shower programs with the NNPDF3.0 PDF set.

Absolute unfolded differential $tq$ cross-section $|y(t)|$. The shaded band indicates the total measurement uncertainty. For the sake of brevity, all theory predictions are added to this table. The attached plot shows the MCFM predictions only. The cross-section is compared to the theoretical predictions from FO calculations done with MCFM at LO, NLO and NNLO, predictions obtained with Powheg+Pythia8 with different PDF sets and predictions from different MC event generators and parton shower programs with the NNPDF3.0 PDF set.

Absolute unfolded differential $\bar{t}q$ cross-section $|y(\bar{t})|$. The shaded band indicates the total measurement uncertainty. For the sake of brevity, all theory predictions are added to this table. The attached plot shows the MCFM predictions only. The cross-section is compared to the theoretical predictions from FO calculations done with MCFM at LO, NLO and NNLO, predictions obtained with Powheg+Pythia8 with different PDF sets and predictions from different MC event generators and parton shower programs with the NNPDF3.0 PDF set.

Normalised unfolded differential $tq$ cross-section $p_\text{T}(t)$. The shaded band indicates the total measurement uncertainty. For the sake of brevity, all theory predictions are added to this table. The attached plot shows the MCFM predictions only. The cross-section is compared to the theoretical predictions from FO calculations done with MCFM at LO, NLO and NNLO, predictions obtained with Powheg+Pythia8 with different PDF sets and predictions from different MC event generators and parton shower programs with the NNPDF3.0 PDF set.

Normalised unfolded differential $\bar{t}q$ cross-section $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$. The shaded band indicates the total measurement uncertainty. For the sake of brevity, all theory predictions are added to this table. The attached plot shows the MCFM predictions only. The cross-section is compared to the theoretical predictions from FO calculations done with MCFM at LO, NLO and NNLO, predictions obtained with Powheg+Pythia8 with different PDF sets and predictions from different MC event generators and parton shower programs with the NNPDF3.0 PDF set.

Normalised unfolded differential $tq$ cross-section $|y(t)|$. The shaded band indicates the total measurement uncertainty. For the sake of brevity, all theory predictions are added to this table. The attached plot shows the MCFM predictions only. The cross-section is compared to the theoretical predictions from FO calculations done with MCFM at LO, NLO and NNLO, predictions obtained with Powheg+Pythia8 with different PDF sets and predictions from different MC event generators and parton shower programs with the NNPDF3.0 PDF set.

Normalised unfolded differential $\bar{t}q$ cross-section $|y(\bar{t})|$. The shaded band indicates the total measurement uncertainty. For the sake of brevity, all theory predictions are added to this table. The attached plot shows the MCFM predictions only. The cross-section is compared to the theoretical predictions from FO calculations done with MCFM at LO, NLO and NNLO, predictions obtained with Powheg+Pythia8 with different PDF sets and predictions from different MC event generators and parton shower programs with the NNPDF3.0 PDF set.

Ratio of the absolute differential $tq$ and $\bar{t}q$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $p_\text{T}(t\ \text{or}\ \bar{t})$ The shaded band indicates the total measurement uncertainty. For the sake of brevity, all theory predictions are added to this table. The attached plot shows the MCFM predictions only. The cross-section is compared to the theoretical predictions from FO calculations done with MCFM at LO, NLO and NNLO, predictions obtained with Powheg+Pythia8 with different PDF sets and predictions from different MC event generators and parton shower programs with the NNPDF3.0 PDF set.

Ratio of the absolute differential $tq$ and $\bar{t}q$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $|y(t\ \text{or}\ \bar{t})|$ The shaded band indicates the total measurement uncertainty. For the sake of brevity, all theory predictions are added to this table. The attached plot shows the MCFM predictions only. The cross-section is compared to the theoretical predictions from FO calculations done with MCFM at LO, NLO and NNLO, predictions obtained with Powheg+Pythia8 with different PDF sets and predictions from different MC event generators and parton shower programs with the NNPDF3.0 PDF set.

Selection efficiencies for the $p_\text{T}(t)$ spectrum calculated for single top quark production events generated with different values of $C_{Qq}^{3,1}$.

Selection efficiencies for the $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$ spectrum calculated for single top antiquark production events generated with different values of $C_{Qq}^{3,1}$.

Migration matrix for the $tq$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(t)$. The parton-level top quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed top quark is shown on the $x$-axis. In the graphic, the rows are normalised to unity and the shadow bin is not shown. The table lists the event yield per bin.

Migration matrix for the $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$. The parton-level top quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed top quark is shown on the $x$-axis. In the graphic, the rows are normalised to unity and the shadow bin is not shown. The table lists the event yield per bin.

Migration matrix for the $tq$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$. The parton-level top quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed top quark is shown on the $x$-axis. In the graphic, the rows are normalised to unity. The table lists the event yield per bin.

Migration matrix for the $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(\bar{t})|$. The parton-level top quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed top quark is shown on the $x$-axis. In the graphic, the rows are normalised to unity. The table lists the event yield per bin.

Expected event yields per process and observed event yields in the two signal regions. The given uncertainties are the rate uncertainties defined as the relative uncertainty on the postfit event yields.

$\chi^2$ probabilities of the predictions for the absolute and normalised differential $tq\ \text{or}\ \bar{t}q$ production cross-sections and the ratio of the cross-sections as a function of $p_\text{T}(t)$, $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$ and $p_\text{T}(t\ \text{or}\ \bar{t})$ respectively. The uncertainties in the measured cross-sections and in the predictions are considered. The number of degrees of freedom (NDF) is listed for each distribution.

$\chi^2$ probabilities of the predictions for the absolute and normalised differential $tq\ \text{or}\ \bar{t}q$ production cross-sections and the ratio of the cross-sections as a function of $|y(t)|$, $|y(\bar{t})|$ and $|y(t\ \text{or}\ \bar{t})|$ respectively. The uncertainties in the measured cross-sections and in the predictions are considered. The number of degrees of freedom (NDF) is listed for each distribution.

Summary of the uncertainties on the absolute differential $tq$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $p_\text{T}(t)$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the absolute differential $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the absolute differential $tq$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $|y(t)|$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the absolute differential $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(\bar{t})|$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the normalised differential $tq$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $p_\text{T}(t)$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the normalised differential $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the normalised differential $tq$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $|y(t)|$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the normalised differential $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(\bar{t})|$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the ratio of the absolute differential $tq$ and $\bar{t}q$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $p_\text{T}(t\ \text{or}\ \bar{t})$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Summary of the uncertainties on the ratio of the absolute differential $tq$ and $\bar{t}q$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $|y(t\ \text{or}\ \bar{t})|$. Similar sources of uncertainties are grouped together via their quadratic sum. The total uncertainty is defined as the quadratic sum of all sources of uncertainties.

Best fit results for the expected relative change in the differential $tq$ and $\bar{t}q$ cross-sections as a function of $C_{Qq}^{3,1}/\Lambda^2$. The predictions for the expected relative change are obtained by unfolding the distributions of the EFT MC samples with the nominal migration matrix and efficiency. The parameterisations are determined from least-square fits to the predictions normalised to the prediction from the EFT MC sample generated with $C_{Qq}^{3,1}/\Lambda^2$ set to zero. The parameterisations take the form $\Delta\tilde{\sigma}_{t\text{ or }\bar{t}}(C_{Qq}^{3,1}/\Lambda^2) = \left(1 + a_1 \cdot C_{Qq}^{3,1}/\Lambda^2 + a_2 \cdot (C_{Qq}^{3,1}/\Lambda^2)^2\right)$.

Event yields in the $\ell^+$ signal region without the background scale factors applied. Supplementary material for cutflow comparisons, therefore only the $p_\text{T}(\ell\nu b)$ distributions for both SRs are included in the HEPData entry.

Event yields in the $\ell^-$ signal region without the background scale factors applied. Supplementary material for cutflow comparisons, therefore only the $p_\text{T}(\ell\nu b)$ distributions for both SRs are included in the HEPData entry.

Statistical covariance matrix for the absolute $tq$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(t)$. The data and MC statistical uncertainties are incorporated.

Statistical covariance matrix for the absolute $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$. The data and MC statistical uncertainties are incorporated.

Statistical covariance matrix for the absolute $tq$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$. The data and MC statistical uncertainties are incorporated.

Statistical covariance matrix for the absolute $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(\bar{t})|$. The data and MC statistical uncertainties are incorporated.

Statistical covariance matrix for the normalised $tq$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(t)$. The data and MC statistical uncertainties are incorporated.

Statistical covariance matrix for the normalised $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$. The data and MC statistical uncertainties are incorporated.

Statistical covariance matrix for the absolute $tq$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$. The data and MC statistical uncertainties are incorporated.

Statistical covariance matrix for the absolute $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(\bar{t})|$. The data and MC statistical uncertainties are incorporated.

Statistical covariance matrix for ratio of the absolute differential $tq$ and $\bar{t}q$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $p_\text{T}(t\ \text{or}\ \bar{t})$. The data and MC statistical uncertainties are incorporated.

Statistical covariance matrix for ratio of the absolute differential $tq$ and $\bar{t}q$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $|y(t\ \text{or}\ \bar{t})|$. The data and MC statistical uncertainties are incorporated.

Statistical correlation between the absolute cross-sections binned in $p_\text{T}(t)$ and $|y(t)|$. The correlation is evaluated from 1000 synchronised pseudo-experiments created by fluctuating the data-distributions according to a Poisson distribution.

Statistical correlation between the absolute cross-sections binned in $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$ and $|y(\bar{t})|$. The correlation is evaluated from 1000 synchronised pseudo-experiments created by fluctuating the data-distributions according to a Poisson distribution.

Statistical correlation between the normalised cross-sections binned in $p_\text{T}(t)$ and $|y(t)|$. The correlation is evaluated from 1000 synchronised pseudo-experiments created by fluctuating the data-distributions according to a Poisson distribution.

Statistical correlation between the normalised cross-sections binned in $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$ and $|y(\bar{t})|$. The correlation is evaluated from 1000 synchronised pseudo-experiments created by fluctuating the data-distributions according to a Poisson distribution.

Covariance matrix for the absolute $tq$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(t)$. All statistical and systematic uncertainties are incorporated.

Covariance matrix for the absolute $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$. All statistical and systematic uncertainties are incorporated.

Covariance matrix for the absolute $tq$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$. All statistical and systematic uncertainties are incorporated.

Covariance matrix for the absolute $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(\bar{t})|$. All statistical and systematic uncertainties are incorporated.

Covariance matrix for the normalised $tq$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(t)$. All statistical and systematic uncertainties are incorporated.

Covariance matrix for the normalised $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$. All statistical and systematic uncertainties are incorporated.

Covariance matrix for the absolute $tq$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$. All statistical and systematic uncertainties are incorporated.

Covariance matrix for the absolute $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(\bar{t})|$. All statistical and systematic uncertainties are incorporated.

Covariance matrix for ratio of the absolute differential $tq$ and $\bar{t}q$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $p_\text{T}(t\ \text{or}\ \bar{t})$. All statistical and systematic uncertainties are incorporated.

Covariance matrix for ratio of the absolute differential $tq$ and $\bar{t}q$ production cross-sections measured as a function of $|y(t\ \text{or}\ \bar{t})|$. All statistical and systematic uncertainties are incorporated.

Central values and statistical uncertainties of the systematic uncertainty on the absolute $tq$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(t)$. The statistical uncertainty is evaluated for JES, JER and modeling related uncertainties. Both the central values for the up and down variation and the respective statistical uncertainties are evaluated from bootstrap experiments. The left (right) column per $p_\text{T}(t)$ interval shows the up (down) variation. The central value and variations are given in percent of the measurement result in the respective bin.

Central values and statistical uncertainties of the systematic uncertainty on the absolute $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$. The statistical uncertainty is evaluated for JES, JER and modeling related uncertainties. Both the central values for the up and down variation and the respective statistical uncertainties are evaluated from bootstrap experiments. The left (right) column per $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$ interval shows the up (down) variation. The central value and variations are given in percent of the measurement result in the respective bin.

Central values and statistical uncertainties of the systematic uncertainty on the absolute $tq$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$. The statistical uncertainty is evaluated for JES, JER and modeling related uncertainties. Both the central values for the up and down variation and the respective statistical uncertainties are evaluated from bootstrap experiments. The left (right) column per $|y(t)|$ interval shows the up (down) variation. The central value and variations are given in percent of the measurement result in the respective bin.

Central values and statistical uncertainties of the systematic uncertainty on the absolute $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(\bar{t})|$. The statistical uncertainty is evaluated for JES, JER and modeling related uncertainties. Both the central values for the up and down variation and the respective statistical uncertainties are evaluated from bootstrap experiments. The left (right) column per $|y(\bar{t})|$ interval shows the up (down) variation. The central value and variations are given in percent of the measurement result in the respective bin.

Central values and statistical uncertainties of the systematic uncertainty on the normalised $tq$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(t)$. The statistical uncertainty is evaluated for JES, JER and modeling related uncertainties. Both the central values for the up and down variation and the respective statistical uncertainties are evaluated from bootstrap experiments. The left (right) column per $p_\text{T}(t)$ interval shows the up (down) variation. The central value and variations are given in percent of the measurement result in the respective bin.

Central values and statistical uncertainties of the systematic uncertainty on the normalised $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$. The statistical uncertainty is evaluated for JES, JER and modeling related uncertainties. Both the central values for the up and down variation and the respective statistical uncertainties are evaluated from bootstrap experiments. The left (right) column per $p_\text{T}(\bar{t})$ interval shows the up (down) variation. The central value and variations are given in percent of the measurement result in the respective bin.

Central values and statistical uncertainties of the systematic uncertainty on the normalised $tq$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$. The statistical uncertainty is evaluated for JES, JER and modeling related uncertainties. Both the central values for the up and down variation and the respective statistical uncertainties are evaluated from bootstrap experiments. The left (right) column per $|y(t)|$ interval shows the up (down) variation. The central value and variations are given in percent of the measurement result in the respective bin.

Central values and statistical uncertainties of the systematic uncertainty on the normalised $\bar{t}q$ production cross-section as a function of $|y(\bar{t})|$. The statistical uncertainty is evaluated for JES, JER and modeling related uncertainties. Both the central values for the up and down variation and the respective statistical uncertainties are evaluated from bootstrap experiments. The left (right) column per $|y(\bar{t})|$ interval shows the up (down) variation. The central value and variations are given in percent of the measurement result in the respective bin.

Distribution of the reconstructed Δφ / π in (a) the signal regions and (b) the validation regions of the 2-lepton channel. Each bin corresponds to one of the signal or validation regions. The distributions and the uncertainty band are obtained before the final fit to the data (pre-fit). "Other Bkg." combines the t̄t + V, t̄t + H, diboson and fakes backgrounds together. In (a), a 3 TeV Z' signal (green dashed and dotted line), a 1 TeV G_KK signal (blue dotted line) and a 2 TeV g_KK signal (red short-dashed and dotted line) are overlaid for illustration purposes, normalised to the total background. The lower panels show the ratio of the data to the total SM background prediction. The error bands include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed m_t̄t for the three signal regions of the 1-lepton channel, after performing the profile-likelihood fit under the background-only hypothesis in the 3+5 signal regions of the 1-lepton and 2-lepton channels, respectively. The overflow is added to the final bins. The lower panel shows the pulls from the fit (red line), where the pull in each bin is defined as (n_obs-n_pred)/√n_obs, and n_obs and n_pred refer to the number of observed events in data and the number of predicted events, respectively. "Vjets" refers to the Z + jets and W+ jets backgrounds, whilst "Other Bkg." combines the t̄t + V, t̄t + H, diboson, and fakes backgrounds together. The table below shows the total number of events in each bin, and is not normalised by bin width.

Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed m_t̄t for the three signal regions of the 1-lepton channel, after performing the profile-likelihood fit under the background-only hypothesis in the 3+5 signal regions of the 1-lepton and 2-lepton channels, respectively. The overflow is added to the final bins. The lower panel shows the pulls from the fit (red line), where the pull in each bin is defined as (n_obs-n_pred)/√n_obs, and n_obs and n_pred refer to the number of observed events in data and the number of predicted events, respectively. "Vjets" refers to the Z + jets and W+ jets backgrounds, whilst "Other Bkg." combines the t̄t + V, t̄t + H, diboson, and fakes backgrounds together. The table below shows the total number of events in each bin, and is not normalised by bin width.

Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed m_t̄t for the three signal regions of the 1-lepton channel, after performing the profile-likelihood fit under the background-only hypothesis in the 3+5 signal regions of the 1-lepton and 2-lepton channels, respectively. The overflow is added to the final bins. The lower panel shows the pulls from the fit (red line), where the pull in each bin is defined as (n_obs-n_pred)/√n_obs, and n_obs and n_pred refer to the number of observed events in data and the number of predicted events, respectively. "Vjets" refers to the Z + jets and W+ jets backgrounds, whilst "Other Bkg." combines the t̄t + V, t̄t + H, diboson, and fakes backgrounds together. The table below shows the total number of events in each bin, and is not normalised by bin width.

Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed m_llbb for the five signal regions of the 2-lepton channel, after performing the profile-likelihood fit under the background-only hypothesis in the 3+5 signal regions of the 1-lepton and 2-lepton channels, respectively. The overflow is added to the final bins. The lower panel shows the pulls from the fit (red line), where the pull in each bin is defined as (n_obs-n_pred)/√n_obs, and n_obs and n_pred refer to the number of observed events in data and the number of predicted events, respectively. "Other Bkg." combines the t̄t + V, t̄t + H, diboson, and fakes backgrounds together. The table below shows the total number of events in each bin, and is not normalised by bin width.

Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed m_llbb for the five signal regions of the 2-lepton channel, after performing the profile-likelihood fit under the background-only hypothesis in the 3+5 signal regions of the 1-lepton and 2-lepton channels, respectively. The overflow is added to the final bins. The lower panel shows the pulls from the fit (red line), where the pull in each bin is defined as (n_obs-n_pred)/√n_obs, and n_obs and n_pred refer to the number of observed events in data and the number of predicted events, respectively. "Other Bkg." combines the t̄t + V, t̄t + H, diboson, and fakes backgrounds together. The table below shows the total number of events in each bin, and is not normalised by bin width.

Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed m_llbb for the five signal regions of the 2-lepton channel, after performing the profile-likelihood fit under the background-only hypothesis in the 3+5 signal regions of the 1-lepton and 2-lepton channels, respectively. The overflow is added to the final bins. The lower panel shows the pulls from the fit (red line), where the pull in each bin is defined as (n_obs-n_pred)/√n_obs, and n_obs and n_pred refer to the number of observed events in data and the number of predicted events, respectively. "Other Bkg." combines the t̄t + V, t̄t + H, diboson, and fakes backgrounds together. The table below shows the total number of events in each bin, and is not normalised by bin width.

Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed m_llbb for the five signal regions of the 2-lepton channel, after performing the profile-likelihood fit under the background-only hypothesis in the 3+5 signal regions of the 1-lepton and 2-lepton channels, respectively. The overflow is added to the final bins. The lower panel shows the pulls from the fit (red line), where the pull in each bin is defined as (n_obs-n_pred)/√n_obs, and n_obs and n_pred refer to the number of observed events in data and the number of predicted events, respectively. "Other Bkg." combines the t̄t + V, t̄t + H, diboson, and fakes backgrounds together. The table below shows the total number of events in each bin, and is not normalised by bin width.

Post-fit distributions of the reconstructed m_llbb for the five signal regions of the 2-lepton channel, after performing the profile-likelihood fit under the background-only hypothesis in the 3+5 signal regions of the 1-lepton and 2-lepton channels, respectively. The overflow is added to the final bins. The lower panel shows the pulls from the fit (red line), where the pull in each bin is defined as (n_obs-n_pred)/√n_obs, and n_obs and n_pred refer to the number of observed events in data and the number of predicted events, respectively. "Other Bkg." combines the t̄t + V, t̄t + H, diboson, and fakes backgrounds together. The table below shows the total number of events in each bin, and is not normalised by bin width.

Observed (pink data points) and expected (black dashed line) upper limits on the signal cross-section times branching ratio to tt̄ for the (a) Z', (b) G_KK, and (c) g_KK signals at 95% CL. Approximate limits for intermediate masses are interpolated between the tested mass hypotheses. For the G_KK signal in (b), the detector resolution is finer than the grid spacing, so the interpolation is only for display purposes. The theory predictions for the production cross-section times branching ratio at the corresponding masses are also shown in (a) for a Z' with a width of 3% (blue line) and a Z' with a width of 1.2% (dark red line), in (b) a G_KK with a width ranging from 3%–6%, and in (c) a g_KK with a width of 30%. Also shown is the relative contribution of the 1-lepton (red dashed and dotted line) and 2-lepton (purple long-dashed and dotted line) channels to the expected combination limits.

Observed (pink data points) and expected (black dashed line) upper limits on the signal cross-section times branching ratio to tt̄ for the (a) Z', (b) G_KK, and (c) g_KK signals at 95% CL. Approximate limits for intermediate masses are interpolated between the tested mass hypotheses. For the G_KK signal in (b), the detector resolution is finer than the grid spacing, so the interpolation is only for display purposes. The theory predictions for the production cross-section times branching ratio at the corresponding masses are also shown in (a) for a Z' with a width of 3% (blue line) and a Z' with a width of 1.2% (dark red line), in (b) a G_KK with a width ranging from 3%–6%, and in (c) a g_KK with a width of 30%. Also shown is the relative contribution of the 1-lepton (red dashed and dotted line) and 2-lepton (purple long-dashed and dotted line) channels to the expected combination limits.

Observed (pink data points) and expected (black dashed line) upper limits on the signal cross-section times branching ratio to tt̄ for the (a) Z', (b) G_KK, and (c) g_KK signals at 95% CL. Approximate limits for intermediate masses are interpolated between the tested mass hypotheses. For the G_KK signal in (b), the detector resolution is finer than the grid spacing, so the interpolation is only for display purposes. The theory predictions for the production cross-section times branching ratio at the corresponding masses are also shown in (a) for a Z' with a width of 3% (blue line) and a Z' with a width of 1.2% (dark red line), in (b) a G_KK with a width ranging from 3%–6%, and in (c) a g_KK with a width of 30%. Also shown is the relative contribution of the 1-lepton (red dashed and dotted line) and 2-lepton (purple long-dashed and dotted line) channels to the expected combination limits.

Selection efficiency times acceptance (Eff x Acc) for the ljets final state as a function of the tt̄ invariant mass at the parton level before the emission of FSR, for the (a) Z', (b) G_KK, and (c) g_KK signals. The selections in the Resolved 1b (dashed blue) and Resolved 2b (short-dashed magenta) are shown as well as the combined region corresponding to the Resolved topology in Figure 2 (solid black). The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainty. All tt̄ decay modes are considered.

Selection efficiency times acceptance (Eff x Acc) for the ljets final state as a function of the tt̄ invariant mass at the parton level before the emission of FSR, for the (a) Z', (b) G_KK, and (c) g_KK signals. The selections in the Resolved 1b (dashed blue) and Resolved 2b (short-dashed magenta) are shown as well as the combined region corresponding to the Resolved topology in Figure 2 (solid black). The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainty. All tt̄ decay modes are considered.

Selection efficiency times acceptance (Eff x Acc) for the ljets final state as a function of the tt̄ invariant mass at the parton level before the emission of FSR, for the (a) Z', (b) G_KK, and (c) g_KK signals. The selections in the Resolved 1b (dashed blue) and Resolved 2b (short-dashed magenta) are shown as well as the combined region corresponding to the Resolved topology in Figure 2 (solid black). The error bars correspond to the statistical uncertainty. All tt̄ decay modes are considered.

Two-dimensional plots of the tt̄ invariant mass at reconstruction level, mtt, against the tt̄ invariant mass at the parton level before the emission of FSR, m_t̄t^{before FSR}, for the SM tt̄ background in (a) the Resolved 1b, (b) the Resolved 2b, and (c) the Merged signal regions of the 1-lepton channel. The colour scale indicates the total number of events in each bin.

Two-dimensional plots of the tt̄ invariant mass at reconstruction level, mtt, against the tt̄ invariant mass at the parton level before the emission of FSR, m_t̄t^{before FSR}, for the SM tt̄ background in (a) the Resolved 1b, (b) the Resolved 2b, and (c) the Merged signal regions of the 1-lepton channel. The colour scale indicates the total number of events in each bin.

Two-dimensional plots of the tt̄ invariant mass at reconstruction level, mtt, against the tt̄ invariant mass at the parton level before the emission of FSR, m_t̄t^{before FSR}, for the SM tt̄ background in (a) the Resolved 1b, (b) the Resolved 2b, and (c) the Merged signal regions of the 1-lepton channel. The colour scale indicates the total number of events in each bin.

List of all the individual sources of systematic uncertainty considered in the analysis. The individual sources, each corresponding to an independent variation, are grouped into categories as described in Section 6, Data and Monte Carlo samples, Modelling of tt, single-top-quark and background proceses and Detector response. The second column shows the source of the uncertainty. The third column shows the impact of each of the individual sources on the measurement, obtained as the shift in $m_{top}$ induced by a positive shift of its uncertainty. The group systematic uncertainty and the corresponding statistical precision are calculated as discussed in the paper.

95% CL upper limits as a function of (left) cτ_{π_d} and (right) M_φ. The upper plots show the expected and observed limits on σ(pp →φ^†φ) for m_{π_d} = 20 GeV: (a) using M_φ = 1.6 TeV and (b) using cτ_{π_d} = 20 mm. The lower plots show a comparison of the observed limits for all three dark pion masses: (c) using M_φ = 1.4 TeV, and (d) using cτ_{π_d} = 1 mm. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

95% CL upper limits as a function of (left) cτ_{π_d} and (right) M_φ. The upper plots show the expected and observed limits on σ(pp →φ^†φ) for m_{π_d} = 20 GeV: (a) using M_φ = 1.6 TeV and (b) using cτ_{π_d} = 20 mm. The lower plots show a comparison of the observed limits for all three dark pion masses: (c) using M_φ = 1.4 TeV, and (d) using cτ_{π_d} = 1 mm. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

95% CL exclusion contours as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d}. The expected and observed limits on σ(pp →φ^†φ) are shown for (a) m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, (b) m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, and (c) m_{π_d} = 20 GeV. A comparison of the observed limits is given in (d) for each of the three dark pion masses.

95% CL exclusion contours as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d}. The expected and observed limits on σ(pp →φ^†φ) are shown for (a) m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, (b) m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, and (c) m_{π_d} = 20 GeV. A comparison of the observed limits is given in (d) for each of the three dark pion masses.

95% CL exclusion contours as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d}. The expected and observed limits on σ(pp →φ^†φ) are shown for (a) m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, (b) m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, and (c) m_{π_d} = 20 GeV. A comparison of the observed limits is given in (d) for each of the three dark pion masses.

95% CL exclusion contours as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d}. The expected and observed limits on σ(pp →φ^†φ) are shown for (a) m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, (b) m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, and (c) m_{π_d} = 20 GeV. A comparison of the observed limits is given in (d) for each of the three dark pion masses.

Comparison of the 95% CL exclusion contours between ATLAS and CMS  for (a) models with m_{π_d} = 10 GeV and (b) models with m_{π_d} = 20 GeV. The expected and observed limits are shown for ATLAS, while only the observed limits in both the model agnostic and GNN cases are included for CMS. The expected limits from the CMS result are omitted, but are, in general, very close to the CMS observed limits.

Comparison of the 95% CL exclusion contours between ATLAS and CMS  for (a) models with m_{π_d} = 10 GeV and (b) models with m_{π_d} = 20 GeV. The expected and observed limits are shown for ATLAS, while only the observed limits in both the model agnostic and GNN cases are included for CMS. The expected limits from the CMS result are omitted, but are, in general, very close to the CMS observed limits.

Normalized minPTF distribution in data, with three selected signal samples for comparison

95% CL exclusion contours as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d} for the Cut-Based analysis. The expected and observed limits on σ(pp →φ^†φ) are shown for (a) m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, (b) m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, and (c) m_{π_d} = 20 GeV. A comparison of the observed limits is given in (d) for each of the three dark pion masses.

95% CL exclusion contours as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d} for the Cut-Based analysis. The expected and observed limits on σ(pp →φ^†φ) are shown for (a) m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, (b) m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, and (c) m_{π_d} = 20 GeV. A comparison of the observed limits is given in (d) for each of the three dark pion masses.

95% CL exclusion contours as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d} for the Cut-Based analysis. The expected and observed limits on σ(pp →φ^†φ) are shown for (a) m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, (b) m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, and (c) m_{π_d} = 20 GeV. A comparison of the observed limits is given in (d) for each of the three dark pion masses.

95% CL exclusion contours as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d} for the Cut-Based analysis. The expected and observed limits on σ(pp →φ^†φ) are shown for (a) m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, (b) m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, and (c) m_{π_d} = 20 GeV. A comparison of the observed limits is given in (d) for each of the three dark pion masses.

Comparison of observed and expected 95% CL limits of the Cut-Based analysis against the corresponding BDT-based analysis. Limits on σ(pp →φ^†φ) are shown as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d} for (a) m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, (b) m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, and (c) m_{π_d} = 20 GeV.

Comparison of observed and expected 95% CL limits of the Cut-Based analysis against the corresponding BDT-based analysis. Limits on σ(pp →φ^†φ) are shown as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d} for (a) m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, (b) m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, and (c) m_{π_d} = 20 GeV.

Comparison of observed and expected 95% CL limits of the Cut-Based analysis against the corresponding BDT-based analysis. Limits on σ(pp →φ^†φ) are shown as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d} for (a) m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, (b) m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, and (c) m_{π_d} = 20 GeV.

Normalized event-level BDT response distribution in data, with three selected signal samples for comparison.

Normalized jet-matched displaced vertex multiplicity (N_DV) distribution in data, with three selected signal samples for comparison.

Normalized event-level BDT response distribution in data, with three selected signal samples for comparison. All three signal models have M_φ = 1.8 TeV and cτ_{π_d} = 75 mm, but different m_{π_d}.

Normalized event-level BDT response distribution in data, with three selected signal samples for comparison. All three signal models have m_{π_d} = 10 GeV and cτ_{π_d} = 20 mm, but different M_φ.

Normalized event-level BDT response distribution in data, with three selected signal samples for comparison. All three signal models have m_{π_d} = 10 GeV and M_φ = 1.4 TeV, but different cτ_{π_d}.

Observed 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 5, 10, and 20 GeV and cτ_{π_d} = 1000 mm as a function of dark mediator mass. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

Observed 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 5, 10, and 20 GeV and cτ_{π_d} = 500 mm as a function of dark mediator mass. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

Observed 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 5, 10, and 20 GeV and cτ_{π_d} = 300 mm as a function of dark mediator mass. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

Observed 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 5, 10, and 20 GeV and cτ_{π_d} = 150 mm as a function of dark mediator mass. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

Observed 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 5, 10, and 20 GeV and cτ_{π_d} = 75 mm as a function of dark mediator mass. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

Observed 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 5, 10, and 20 GeV and cτ_{π_d} = 20 mm as a function of dark mediator mass. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

Observed 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 5, 10, and 20 GeV and cτ_{π_d} = 5 mm as a function of dark mediator mass. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

Observed 95% CL limit for models with m_{π_d} = 5, 10, and 20 GeV and cτ_{π_d} = 2 mm as a function of dark mediator mass. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

Observed 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 5, 10, and 20 GeV and cτ_{π_d} = 1 mm as a function of dark mediator mass. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

Observed 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 5, 10, and 20 GeV and M_φ = 2.2 TeV as a function of dark pion lifetime. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

Observed 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 5, 10, and 20 GeV and M_φ = 2 TeV as a function of dark pion lifetime. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

Observed 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 5, 10, and 20 GeV and M_φ = 1.8 TeV as a function of dark pion lifetime. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

Observed 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 5, 10, and 20 GeV and M_φ = 1.6 TeV as a function of dark pion lifetime. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

Observed 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 5, 10, and 20 GeV and M_φ = 1.4 TeV as a function of dark pion lifetime. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

Observed 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 5, 10, and 20 GeV and M_φ = 1 TeV as a function of dark pion lifetime. The mediator mass-dependent theoretical cross-section is given with the band corresponding to the uncertainty from NNLL-Fast.

Observed and expected 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 20 GeV as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d}.

Observed and expected 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 20 GeV as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d}.

Observed and expected 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 20 GeV as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d}.

Observed and expected 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 20 GeV as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d}.

Observed and expected 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 20 GeV as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d}.

Observed and expected 95% CL limits for models with m_{π_d} = 20 GeV as a function of M_φ and cτ_{π_d}.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, M_φ = 1600 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, M_φ = 1400 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, M_φ = 1000 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, M_φ = 2200 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, M_φ = 2000 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, M_φ = 1800 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, M_φ = 1600 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, M_φ = 1400 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 5 GeV, M_φ = 1000 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 20 GeV, M_φ = 2200 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 20 GeV, M_φ = 2000 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 20 GeV, M_φ = 1800 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 20 GeV, M_φ = 1600 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 20 GeV, M_φ = 1400 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 20 GeV, M_φ = 1000 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, M_φ = 2200 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, M_φ = 2000 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

Cut-Flow efficiencies for the m_{π_d} = 10 GeV, M_φ = 1800 GeV models for all cuts before entering the Search region (ABCD plane) and then for each of the ABCD regions separately.

The correlation matrix corresponding to the statistical uncertainties on the differential cross-section ($d\sigma/dp_T$) fit results for $W^-$. To combine with $W^+$ results (Fig8a), use the rows and columns ordered as $W^+$ and then $W^-$. Assume no correlation in the statistical uncertainties between $W^+$ and $W^-$ (zero entries in the off-diagonal blocks).

The correlation matrix corresponding to all of the systematic uncertainties on the differential cross-section ($d\sigma/dp_T$) fit results for $W^+$ and $W^-$ combined together, with rows and columns ordered as $W^+$ and then $W^-$.

Absolute differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The last bin includes overflow beyond the upper bin boundary. The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 39 to 42 and the covariance matrices in Tables 143 to 146

Absolute differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity|. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 43 to 46 and the covariance matrices in Tables 147 to 150

Absolute differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 47 to 50 and the covariance matrices in Tables 151 to 154

Absolute differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The last bin includes overflow beyond the upper bin boundary. The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 51 to 54 and the covariance matrices in Tables 155 to 158

Absolute differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The last bin includes overflow beyond the upper bin boundary. The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 55 to 58 and the covariance matrices in Tables 159 to 162

Absolute differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The last bin includes overflow beyond the upper bin boundary. The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 59 to 62 and the covariance matrices in Tables 163 to 166

Absolute differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The last bin includes overflow beyond the upper bin boundary. The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 63 to 66 and the covariance matrices in Tables 167 to 170

Normalised differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The last bin includes overflow beyond the upper bin boundary. The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 67 to 70 and the covariance matrices in Tables 171 to 174

Normalised differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta|. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 71 to 74 and the covariance matrices in Tables 175 to 178

Normalised differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The last bin includes overflow beyond the upper bin boundary. The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 75 to 78 and the covariance matrices in Tables 179 to 182

Normalised differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The last bin includes overflow beyond the upper bin boundary. The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 79 to 82 and the covariance matrices in Tables 183 to 186

Normalised differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity|. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 83 to 86 and the covariance matrices in Tables 187 to 190

Normalised differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 87 to 90 and the covariance matrices in Tables 191 to 194

Normalised differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The last bin includes overflow beyond the upper bin boundary. The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 91 to 94 and the covariance matrices in Tables 195 to 198

Normalised differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The last bin includes overflow beyond the upper bin boundary. The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 95 to 98 and the covariance matrices in Tables 199 to 202

Normalised differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The last bin includes overflow beyond the upper bin boundary. The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 99 to 102 and the covariance matrices in Tables 203 to 206

Normalised differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT. The first column gives the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays, and the second gives the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns three and four give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The last bin includes overflow beyond the upper bin boundary. The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 103 to 106 and the covariance matrices in Tables 207 to 210

Absolute differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass. Columns 1-4 give the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays in the four mass bins. Columns 5-8 give the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns 9-16 give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 107 to 110 and the covariance matrices in Tables 211 to 214

Absolute differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass. Columns 1-4 give the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays in the four mass bins. Columns 5-8 give the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns 9-16 give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 111 to 114 and the covariance matrices in Tables 215 to 218

Absolute differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass. Columns 1-4 give the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays in the four mass bins. Columns 5-8 give the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns 9-16 give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 115 to 118 and the covariance matrices in Tables 219 to 222

Normalised differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass. Columns 1-4 give the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays in the four mass bins. Columns 5-8 give the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns 9-16 give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 119 to 122 and the covariance matrices in Tables 223 to 226

Normalised differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass. Columns 1-4 give the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays in the four mass bins. Columns 5-8 give the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns 9-16 give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 123 to 126 and the covariance matrices in Tables 227 to 230

Normalised differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass. Columns 1-4 give the tt->em cross-section including contributions from leptonic tau decays in the four mass bins. Columns 5-8 give the tt->em cross-section without including the leptonic tau contributions. Columns 9-16 give the corresponding results for the embb cross-sections. Systematic uncertainties are given for ttbar modelling (ttmod), lepton calibration (lept), jet and b-tagging calibration (jet), backgrounds (bkg) and integrated luminosity and beam energy (leb). The corresponding correlation matrices are given in Tables 127 to 130 and the covariance matrices in Tables 231 to 234

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 1, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 1, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 1, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 1, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 2, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 2, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 2, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 2, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 3, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 3, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 3, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 3, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 4, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 4, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 4, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 4, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 5, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 5, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 5, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 5, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 6, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 6, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 6, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 6, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 7, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 7, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 7, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 7, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 8, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 8, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 8, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 8, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 9, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 9, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 9, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 9, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 10, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 10, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 10, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 10, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 11, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 11, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 11, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 11, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 12, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 12, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 12, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 12, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 13, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 13, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 13, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 13, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 14, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 14, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 14, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 14, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 15, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 15, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 15, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 15, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 16, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 16, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 16, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 16, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 17, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 17, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 17, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 17, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 18, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 18, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 18, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 18, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 19, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 19, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 19, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 19, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 20, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 20, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 20, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 20, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 21, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 21, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 21, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 21, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 22, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 22, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 22, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 22, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 23, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 23, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 23, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 23, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 24, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 24, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 24, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 24, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 25, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 25, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 25, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 25, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 26, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 26, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 26, including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 26, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 1, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 1, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 1, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 1, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 2, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 2, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 2, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 2, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 3, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 3, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 3, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 3, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 4, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 4, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 4, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 4, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 5, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 5, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 5, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 5, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 6, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 6, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 6, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 6, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 7, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 7, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 7, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 7, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 8, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 8, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 8, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 8, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 9, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 9, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 9, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 9, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 10, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 10, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 10, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 10, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 11, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 11, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 11, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton pT as measured in Table 11, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 12, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 12, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 12, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| as measured in Table 12, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 13, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 13, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 13, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton pT as measured in Table 13, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 14, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 14, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 14, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 14, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 15, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 15, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 15, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| as measured in Table 15, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 16, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 16, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 16, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons as measured in Table 16, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 17, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 17, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 17, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of pT of the two leptons as measured in Table 17, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 18, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 18, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 18, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the sum of the energies of the two leptons as measured in Table 18, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 19, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 19, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 19, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of maximum lepton pT as measured in Table 19, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 20, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 20, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 20, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of minimum lepton pT as measured in Table 20, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 21, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 21, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 21, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 21, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 22, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 22, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 22, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 22, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 23, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 23, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 23, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the absolute embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 23, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 24, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 24, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 24, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of lepton |eta| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 24, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 25, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 25, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 25, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of dilepton |rapidity| and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 25, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 26, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised ttem differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 26, not including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 26, including tau decay contributions

Covariance matrix for the normalised embb differential cross-section in the fiducial region as a function of the azimuthal angle between the leptons and dilepton invariant mass as measured in Table 26, not including tau decay contributions

Correlation matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional absolute ttem fiducial cross-section measurements, including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-12), lepton |eta| (bins 13-21), dilepton pT (bins 22-32), dilepton invariant mass (bins 33-47), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 48-56), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 57-76), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 77-86), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 87-98), maximum lepton pT (bins 99-110), minimum lepton pT (bins 111-121)

Correlation matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional absolute ttem fiducial cross-section measurements, not including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-12), lepton |eta| (bins 13-21), dilepton pT (bins 22-32), dilepton invariant mass (bins 33-47), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 48-56), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 57-76), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 77-86), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 87-98), maximum lepton pT (bins 99-110), minimum lepton pT (bins 111-121)

Correlation matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional absolute embb fiducial cross-section measurements, including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-12), lepton |eta| (bins 13-21), dilepton pT (bins 22-32), dilepton invariant mass (bins 33-47), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 48-56), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 57-76), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 77-86), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 87-98), maximum lepton pT (bins 99-110), minimum lepton pT (bins 111-121)

Correlation matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional absolute embb fiducial cross-section measurements, not including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-12), lepton |eta| (bins 13-21), dilepton pT (bins 22-32), dilepton invariant mass (bins 33-47), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 48-56), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 57-76), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 77-86), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 87-98), maximum lepton pT (bins 99-110), minimum lepton pT (bins 111-121)

Correlation matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional normalised ttem fiducial cross-section measurements, including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-11), lepton |eta| (bins 12-19), dilepton pT (bins 20-29), dilepton invariant mass (bins 30-43), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 44-51), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 52-70), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 71-79), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 80-90), maximum lepton pT (bins 91-101), minimum lepton pT (bins 102-111)

Correlation matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional normalised ttem fiducial cross-section measurements, not including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-11), lepton |eta| (bins 12-19), dilepton pT (bins 20-29), dilepton invariant mass (bins 30-43), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 44-51), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 52-70), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 71-79), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 80-90), maximum lepton pT (bins 91-101), minimum lepton pT (bins 102-111)

Correlation matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional normalised embb fiducial cross-section measurements, including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-11), lepton |eta| (bins 12-19), dilepton pT (bins 20-29), dilepton invariant mass (bins 30-43), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 44-51), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 52-70), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 71-79), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 80-90), maximum lepton pT (bins 91-101), minimum lepton pT (bins 102-111)

Correlation matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional normalised embb fiducial cross-section measurements, not including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-11), lepton |eta| (bins 12-19), dilepton pT (bins 20-29), dilepton invariant mass (bins 30-43), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 44-51), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 52-70), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 71-79), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 80-90), maximum lepton pT (bins 91-101), minimum lepton pT (bins 102-111)

Covariance matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional absolute ttem fiducial cross-section measurements, including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-12), lepton |eta| (bins 13-21), dilepton pT (bins 22-32), dilepton invariant mass (bins 33-47), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 48-56), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 57-76), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 77-86), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 87-98), maximum lepton pT (bins 99-110), minimum lepton pT (bins 111-121)

Covariance matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional absolute ttem fiducial cross-section measurements, not including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-12), lepton |eta| (bins 13-21), dilepton pT (bins 22-32), dilepton invariant mass (bins 33-47), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 48-56), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 57-76), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 77-86), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 87-98), maximum lepton pT (bins 99-110), minimum lepton pT (bins 111-121)

Covariance matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional absolute embb fiducial cross-section measurements, including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-12), lepton |eta| (bins 13-21), dilepton pT (bins 22-32), dilepton invariant mass (bins 33-47), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 48-56), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 57-76), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 77-86), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 87-98), maximum lepton pT (bins 99-110), minimum lepton pT (bins 111-121)

Covariance matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional absolute embb fiducial cross-section measurements, not including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-12), lepton |eta| (bins 13-21), dilepton pT (bins 22-32), dilepton invariant mass (bins 33-47), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 48-56), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 57-76), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 77-86), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 87-98), maximum lepton pT (bins 99-110), minimum lepton pT (bins 111-121)

Covariance matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional normalised ttem fiducial cross-section measurements, including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-11), lepton |eta| (bins 12-19), dilepton pT (bins 20-29), dilepton invariant mass (bins 30-43), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 44-51), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 52-70), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 71-79), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 80-90), maximum lepton pT (bins 91-101), minimum lepton pT (bins 102-111)

Covariance matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional normalised ttem fiducial cross-section measurements, not including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-11), lepton |eta| (bins 12-19), dilepton pT (bins 20-29), dilepton invariant mass (bins 30-43), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 44-51), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 52-70), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 71-79), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 80-90), maximum lepton pT (bins 91-101), minimum lepton pT (bins 102-111)

Covariance matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional normalised embb fiducial cross-section measurements, including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-11), lepton |eta| (bins 12-19), dilepton pT (bins 20-29), dilepton invariant mass (bins 30-43), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 44-51), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 52-70), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 71-79), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 80-90), maximum lepton pT (bins 91-101), minimum lepton pT (bins 102-111)

Covariance matrix for the combination of all ten one-dimensional normalised embb fiducial cross-section measurements, not including tau decay contributions. The observables are arranged as follows: lepton pT (bins 0-11), lepton |eta| (bins 12-19), dilepton pT (bins 20-29), dilepton invariant mass (bins 30-43), dilepton |rapidity| (bins 44-51), the azimuthal angle between the leptons (bins 52-70), the sum of pT of the two leptons (bins 71-79), the sum of the energies of the two leptons (bins 80-90), maximum lepton pT (bins 91-101), minimum lepton pT (bins 102-111)

The measured differential cross-section for $W^+$ in bins of the $p_T$ of the $W$.

Statistical correlations of angular coefficients and differential cross-section for $W^-$ as a function of $p_{T}(W)$. Included as a CSV file due to file size.

Statistical correlations of angular coefficients and differential cross-section for $W^+$ as a function of $p_{T}(W)$. Included as a CSV file due to file size.

Correlation between N_ch^rec and fcalsum in minimum-bias events for (a) O+O and (b) Ne+Ne collisions, and distributions of N_ch^rec in minimum-bias events for (c) O+O and (d) Ne+Ne collisions, including the distributions for several centrality intervals.

Correlation between N_ch^rec and fcalsum in minimum-bias events for (a) O+O and (b) Ne+Ne collisions, and distributions of N_ch^rec in minimum-bias events for (c) O+O and (d) Ne+Ne collisions, including the distributions for several centrality intervals.

The p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in the (a, c, e) O+O and (b, d, f) Ne+Ne collisions, for the (a, b) 0–5%, (c, d) 20–30% and (e, f) 50–60% centrality intervals. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

The p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in the (a, c, e) O+O and (b, d, f) Ne+Ne collisions, for the (a, b) 0–5%, (c, d) 20–30% and (e, f) 50–60% centrality intervals. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

The p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in the (a, c, e) O+O and (b, d, f) Ne+Ne collisions, for the (a, b) 0–5%, (c, d) 20–30% and (e, f) 50–60% centrality intervals. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

The p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in the (a, c, e) O+O and (b, d, f) Ne+Ne collisions, for the (a, b) 0–5%, (c, d) 20–30% and (e, f) 50–60% centrality intervals. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

The p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in the (a, c, e) O+O and (b, d, f) Ne+Ne collisions, for the (a, b) 0–5%, (c, d) 20–30% and (e, f) 50–60% centrality intervals. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

The p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in the (a, c, e) O+O and (b, d, f) Ne+Ne collisions, for the (a, b) 0–5%, (c, d) 20–30% and (e, f) 50–60% centrality intervals. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

The p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in the (a, c, e) O+O and (b, d, f) Ne+Ne collisions, for the (a, b) 0–5%, (c, d) 20–30% and (e, f) 50–60% centrality intervals. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

The p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in the (a, c, e) O+O and (b, d, f) Ne+Ne collisions, for the (a, b) 0–5%, (c, d) 20–30% and (e, f) 50–60% centrality intervals. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

The p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in the (a, c, e) O+O and (b, d, f) Ne+Ne collisions, for the (a, b) 0–5%, (c, d) 20–30% and (e, f) 50–60% centrality intervals. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

The p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in the (a, c, e) O+O and (b, d, f) Ne+Ne collisions, for the (a, b) 0–5%, (c, d) 20–30% and (e, f) 50–60% centrality intervals. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of N_ch. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). Ratios are shown only for the 0–50% centrality range to suppress large statistical fluctuations in more peripheral intervals. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of N_ch. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). Ratios are shown only for the 0–50% centrality range to suppress large statistical fluctuations in more peripheral intervals. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of N_ch. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). Ratios are shown only for the 0–50% centrality range to suppress large statistical fluctuations in more peripheral intervals. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of N_ch. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). Ratios are shown only for the 0–50% centrality range to suppress large statistical fluctuations in more peripheral intervals. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of N_ch. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). Ratios are shown only for the 0–50% centrality range to suppress large statistical fluctuations in more peripheral intervals. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of N_ch. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). Ratios are shown only for the 0–50% centrality range to suppress large statistical fluctuations in more peripheral intervals. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of N_ch. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). Ratios are shown only for the 0–50% centrality range to suppress large statistical fluctuations in more peripheral intervals. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of N_ch. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). Ratios are shown only for the 0–50% centrality range to suppress large statistical fluctuations in more peripheral intervals. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of centrality. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of centrality. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of centrality. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of centrality. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of centrality. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of centrality. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of centrality. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

(a) Flow harmonics v_n^sub{2} and v_n{4} for the elliptic and triangular moments in O+O collisions (colored solid markers) and Ne+Ne collisions (open black markers) at √s_NN=5.36 TeV, shown as a function of centrality. The Ne+Ne points are slightly displaced along the horizontal axis for visual clarity. (b) Ratios of the flow coefficients in Ne+Ne to those in O+O collisions, corresponding to the results in panel (a). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. For the ratios, systematic uncertainties correlated between the O+O and Ne+Ne measurements largely cancel.

Comparisons of the (a) v₂ and (b) v₃ measured by the template-fit method in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions with prior measurements in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions from Ref. [7], as a function of centrality. The Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb results are obtained with the 2PC method. The plots are for 0.5<p_T^a,b<5 GeV. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

Comparisons of the (a) v₂ and (b) v₃ measured by the template-fit method in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions with prior measurements in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions from Ref. [7], as a function of centrality. The Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb results are obtained with the 2PC method. The plots are for 0.5<p_T^a,b<5 GeV. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

Comparison of the (a) v₂^sub{2} and the (b) v₃^sub{2} measured in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions with prior measurements in p+Pb, Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions from Ref. [7], as a function of the reconstructed charged-particle multiplicity (N_ch^rec). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively, and are often too small to be visible.

Comparison of the (a) v₂^sub{2} and the (b) v₃^sub{2} measured in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions with prior measurements in p+Pb, Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions from Ref. [7], as a function of the reconstructed charged-particle multiplicity (N_ch^rec). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively, and are often too small to be visible.

Comparison of the (a) v₂^sub{2} and the (b) v₃^sub{2} measured in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions with prior measurements in p+Pb, Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions from Ref. [7], as a function of the reconstructed charged-particle multiplicity (N_ch^rec). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively, and are often too small to be visible.

Comparison of the (a) v₂^sub{2} and the (b) v₃^sub{2} measured in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions with prior measurements in p+Pb, Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions from Ref. [7], as a function of the reconstructed charged-particle multiplicity (N_ch^rec). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively, and are often too small to be visible.

Comparison of the (a) v₂^sub{2} and the (b) v₃^sub{2} measured in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions with prior measurements in p+Pb, Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions from Ref. [7], as a function of the reconstructed charged-particle multiplicity (N_ch^rec). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively, and are often too small to be visible.

Comparison of the (a) v₂^sub{2} and the (b) v₃^sub{2} measured in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions with prior measurements in p+Pb, Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions from Ref. [7], as a function of the reconstructed charged-particle multiplicity (N_ch^rec). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively, and are often too small to be visible.

Comparison of the (a) v₂^sub{2} and the (b) v₃^sub{2} measured in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions with prior measurements in p+Pb, Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions from Ref. [7], as a function of the reconstructed charged-particle multiplicity (N_ch^rec). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively, and are often too small to be visible.

Comparison of the (a) v₂^sub{2} and the (b) v₃^sub{2} measured in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions with prior measurements in p+Pb, Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions from Ref. [7], as a function of the reconstructed charged-particle multiplicity (N_ch^rec). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively, and are often too small to be visible.

Comparison of the (a) v₂^sub{2} and the (b) v₃^sub{2} measured in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions with prior measurements in p+Pb, Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions from Ref. [7], as a function of the reconstructed charged-particle multiplicity (N_ch^rec). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively, and are often too small to be visible.

Comparison of the (a) v₂^sub{2} and the (b) v₃^sub{2} measured in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions with prior measurements in p+Pb, Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions from Ref. [7], as a function of the reconstructed charged-particle multiplicity (N_ch^rec). The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively, and are often too small to be visible.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in O+O collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and bands indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5a.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in O+O collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and bands indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5a.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in O+O collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and bands indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5a.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in O+O collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and bands indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5a.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in O+O collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and bands indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5a.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in O+O collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and bands indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5a.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in O+O collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and bands indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5a.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in O+O collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and bands indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5a.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in O+O collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and bands indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5a.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in O+O collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and bands indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5a.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in O+O collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and bands indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5a.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in O+O collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and bands indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5a.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in Ne+Ne collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5b.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in Ne+Ne collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5b.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in Ne+Ne collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5b.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in Ne+Ne collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5b.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in Ne+Ne collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5b.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in Ne+Ne collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5b.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in Ne+Ne collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5b.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in Ne+Ne collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5b.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in Ne+Ne collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5b.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in Ne+Ne collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5b.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in Ne+Ne collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5b.

Comparison of the p_T^b dependence of the v_n^2PC{2} and v_n^sub{2} in Ne+Ne collisions. Each panel corresponds to a different centrality interval. The solid and open points show the results obtained using the 2PC and the template-fit methods, respectively. The vertical lines and vertical bars indicate statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Panel (a) is identical to Figure 5b.