Adolph, C.
E+ E- Scattering
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 10 of 873 results

rivet Analysis
$K^0$ Production in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilations at 30-{GeV} Center-of-mass Energy

The TASSO collaboration Brandelik, R. ; Braunschweig, W. ; Gather, K. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 94 (1980) 91-95, 1980.
Inspire Record 153341 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.27173

Inclusive K 0 -production has been measured in e + e - annihilation at a center of mass energy of about W = 30 GeV. The ratio of K 0 + K 0 production to μ + μ - production is R K 0 = 5.6 ± 1.1 (statist. error) ± 0.8 (system.error) This value is about a factor of three higher than R K 0 at W = 7 GeV. The cross sections ( s / β ) d σ /d x is consistent with a scaling behaviour.

4 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

DIFFERENTIAL CROSS SECTION.

Table 3

INVARIANT CROSS SECTION.

More…

rivet Analysis
$\Lambda$ Production in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at 29-{GeV}

de la Vaissiere, C. ; Luth, V. ; Abrams, G.S. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 54 (1985) 2071-2074, 1985.
Inspire Record 209198 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20378

The production of Λ hyperons in e+e− annihilation has been measured as a function of their total momenta, transverse momenta, and the event thrust. The total production rate is 0.213±0.012±0.018 Λ or Λ¯ per hadronic event. The observation of correlations in rapidity and angles for events with two detected Λ decays supports fragmentation models with local baryon-number compensation.

3 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.


rivet Analysis
$\Lambda$ Production in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilations at 29-{GeV}: A Comparison With Lund Model Predictions

Baringer, Philip S. ; Abachi, S. ; Beltrami, I. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 56 (1986) 1346, 1986.
Inspire Record 17781 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20257

This paper presents measurements of the inclusive production cross sections of Λ baryons in e+e− annihilations at s=29 GeV. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 256 pb−1 collected with the High-Resolution Spectrometer at the SLAC storage ring PEP. Comparisons are made to the predictions of the Lund model. The data are well described with use of a strange-diquark suppression parameter, (usud)(sd), of 0.89 ± 0.10−0.16+0.56, and the measured Λc→Λ+X branching ratio of (23 ± 10)%.

3 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

Rapidity relative to thrust axis.

Table 3

Corrected for unobserved moment regions.


$\Lambda$(c)+ Production and Semileptonic Decay in 29-{GeV} $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation

Klein, S. ; Himel, T. ; Abrams, G.S. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 62 (1989) 2444, 1989.
Inspire Record 277034 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20042

We present results on Λc+ production in 29-GeV e+e− annihilation. The Λc+ are observed via their semileptonic decays to Λe+X and Λμ+X. With radiative corrections, we find σ(e+e−→Λc+X)〉BΛc+→eΛX)= 1.5±0.6±0.5 pb or 0.0038±0.0015±0.0012 Λc+→Λe+X decay per hadronic event, and σ(e+e−Λc+X)B(Λc+→μΛX)= 1.4±1.4±0.4 pb or 0.0035±0.0035±0.0011 Λc+→Λμ+X decay per hadronic event. These results can be used to place constraints on the predictions of various production models.

2 data tables
Table 1

Cross sections * branching ratio for LAMBDA/C+ production in LAMBDA E+ decay channel.

Table 2

Cross sections * branching ratio for LAMBDA/C+ production in LAMBDA MU+ decay channel.


$\Lambda(c$) Production From $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation in the $\Upsilon$ Energy Region

The CLEO collaboration Bowcock, T.J.V. ; Giles, R.T. ; Hassard, J. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 55 (1985) 923, 1985.
Inspire Record 214874 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20302

We have observed Λc baryons in nonresonant e+e− annihilation at energies around s=10.5 GeV through their decay to Λπ+π+π−. We measure the branching fraction to be (2.8 ± 0.7 ± 1.1)%. The momentum spectrum of the Λc is similar to that of charmed mesons, providing a constraint on models of charmed-quark hadronization.

2 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

Data are extrapolated over whole x range using the 'Peterson' formula.


$\Sigma(c$)++ and $\Sigma(c$)0 Production From $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation in the $\Upsilon$ Energy Region

The CLEO collaboration Bowcock, T.J.V. ; Kinoshita, K. ; Pipkin, F.M. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 62 (1989) 1240, 1989.
Inspire Record 25467 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.47269

We have observed Σc++ and Σc0 baryons in nonresonant e+e− interactions through their decays to Λc+π± using the CLEO detector. The mass difference M(Σc++)-M(Λc+) is measured to be 167.8±0.4±0.3 MeV; for M(Σc0)-M(Λc+) we find 167.9±0.5±0.3 MeV. Σc decay accounts for (18±3±5)% of Λc+ production.

2 data tables
Table 1

The cross section ratio is multiplied by a factor of 1.5 to account for theunobserved SIGMA/C(2455)+.

Table 2

No description provided.


rivet Analysis
$\pi^0$ Production by $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at 14-{GeV} and 34-{GeV} Center-of-mass Energy

The TASSO collaboration Brandelik, R. ; Braunschweig, W. ; Gather, K. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 108 (1982) 71-76, 1982.
Inspire Record 168232 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.31018

The process e + e − → π 0 + anything has been measured at c.m. energies of 14 and 34 GeV for π 0 energies between 0.5 and 4 GeV. The ratio of π 0 to π ± production for π momenta between 0.5 and 1.5 GeV/ c is measured to be 2 σ ( π 0 )/ [ σ ( π + ) + σ ( π − )] = 1.3 ± 0.4 (1.2 ± 0.4) at 14 (34) GeV. The scaled cross section ( s / μ )d σ /d x when compared with lower energy (4.9–7.4 GeV) π 0 data indicates a substantial scaling violation.

3 data tables
Table 1

COMPARISON OF PI0 WITH CHARGED PION CROSS SECTIONS (SCALED BI 1/S TO SAME ENERGIES).

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.


$\tau$ Leptonic Branching Ratios and a Search for Goldstone Decay

The MARK-III collaboration Baltrusaitis, R.M. ; Becker, J. ; Blaylock, G. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 55 (1985) 1842, 1985.
Inspire Record 215995 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20284

Pairs of τ leptons produced at s=3.77 GeV have been studied in eμ, ee, and μμ final states. The leptonic branching ratios have been measured to be B(τ→eνν)=(18.2±0.7±0.5)% and B(τ→μνν)=(18.0±1.0±0.6)%. Limits have been set for the two-body decays τ→eG and τ→μG, where G is a light Goldstone boson.

7 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

$\tau$ Production and Decay With the Cello Detector at {PETRA}

The CELLO collaboration Behrend, H.J. ; Criegee, L. ; Dainton, J.B. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 222 (1989) 163-172, 1989.
Inspire Record 276859 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.29824

The reaction e + e − → τ + τ − has been studied at centre of mass energies between 14.0 and 46.8 GeV with the CELLO detector at the PETRA e + e − collider. We present results for the cross section σ τ and the charge asymmetry A τ . The results are in good agreement with the standard model. We have also measured the topological decay rates BR 1 , BR 3 and BR 5 for the inclusive decay of the τ lepton into one, three and five charge particles. The results confirm and improve earlier CELLO measurements at other energies. We find for the combined values at all energies BR 1 = (84.9 ± 0.4 ± 0.3)%, BR 3 = (15.0 ± 0.4 ± 0.3)% and BR 5 = (0.16 ± 0.13 ± 0.04)%.

3 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

Corrected for radiative effects and background contributions.


rivet Analysis
>A Measurement of $e^+ e^- \to \bar{p} p$ for 1975-{MeV} $\le \sqrt{s} \le$ 2250-{MeV}

Bisello, D. ; Limentani, S. ; Nigro, M. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.B 224 (1983) 379, 1983.
Inspire Record 190558 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.33935

The e + e − → p p cross section has been measured in the energy interval (1975 ⩽ 2 E ⩽ 2250) MeV for |cos θ | < 0.7. The measurement is based on ∼ 100 events, thus improving by a factor 3 on the previous existing statistics in this energy interval. The form factor | G | 2 is given as a function of energy under the assumption | G E | = | G M |. We also give the first measurement of the differential cross section, averaged over the energy interval, and estimate the ratio G M |/| G E | from it.

3 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.