Distribution of the reconstructed $\tau\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\tau\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_1 signal region for $p_{\text{T}}^{H}>200$ GeV. The observed Higgs boson signal corresponds to $(\sigma\times B)/(\sigma\times B)_{\text{SM}}\,=\,0.99$. Entries with values above the $x$-axis range are shown in the last bin of each distribution. The prediction for each sample is determined from the likelihood fit performed to measure the total $pp\rightarrow H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ cross-section.

Distribution of the reconstructed $\tau\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\tau\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_0 signal region for $m_{jj}<1$ TeV. The observed Higgs boson signal corresponds to $(\sigma\times B)/(\sigma\times B)_{\text{SM}}\,=\,0.99$. Entries with values above the $x$-axis range are shown in the last bin of each distribution. The prediction for each sample is determined from the likelihood fit performed to measure the total $pp\rightarrow H\rightarrow \tau\tau$ cross-section.

Distribution of the reconstructed $\tau\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\tau\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_0 signal region for $m_{jj}>1$ TeV. The observed Higgs boson signal corresponds to $(\sigma\times B)/(\sigma\times B)_{\text{SM}}\,=\,0.99$. Entries with values above the $x$-axis range are shown in the last bin of each distribution. The prediction for each sample is determined from the likelihood fit performed to measure the total $pp\rightarrow H \rightarrow \tau\tau$ cross-section.

Distribution of the reconstructed $\tau\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\tau\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_1 signal region for $m_{jj}<1$ TeV. The observed Higgs boson signal corresponds to $(\sigma\times B)/(\sigma\times B)_{\text{SM}}\,=\,0.99$. Entries with values above the $x$-axis range are shown in the last bin of each distribution. The prediction for each sample is determined from the likelihood fit performed to measure the total $pp\rightarrow \rightarrow \tau\tau$ cross-section.

Distribution of the reconstructed $\tau\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\tau\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_1 signal region for $m_{jj}>1$ TeV. The observed Higgs boson signal corresponds to $(\sigma\times B)/(\sigma\times B)_{\text{SM}}\,=\,0.99$. Entries with values above the $x$-axis range are shown in the last bin of each distribution. The prediction for each sample is determined from the likelihood fit performed to measure the total $pp\rightarrow H\rightarrow \tau\tau$ cross-section.

Comparison of the observed and expected event yields in the ttH categories. The window category contains events with $m_{\tau\tau} \in [100, 150]$ GeV, while events outside of this mass region are included in the sideband region. The observed Higgs boson signal corresponds to $(\sigma\times B)/(\sigma\times B)_{\text{SM}}\,=\,0.99$. The prediction for each sample is determined from the likelihood fit performed to measure the total $pp\rightarrow H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ cross-section.

The measured values of $\sigma_{H}\times B(H\rightarrow\tau\tau)$ relative to the SM expectations in the total (labelled as 'Combined') and per-production-mode fit. The total $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty in each measurement is indicated by the error bar. The total systematic uncertainty in each measurement is also indicated.

The measured values for $\sigma_{H}\times B(H\rightarrow\tau\tau)$ relative to the SM expectations in the simplified template cross-section measurement. The total $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty in each measurement is indicated by the error bar. The total systematic uncertainty in each measurement is also indicated.

Upper limits at 95% CL on simplified template cross-sections in the individual ttH $p_{\text{T}}^{H}$ bins relative to their SM expectation in the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ decay channel, derived using the CL$_\text{s}$ method. The observed upper limits, together with the expected limits both in the background-only hypothesis and in the SM hypothesis (dotted red lines) are included. In the case of the expected limits in the background-only hypothesis, one- and two-standard-deviation uncertainty bands are also shown.

Measured fiducial differential cross-sections as a function of $p_\text{T}(j_0)$. The measurements are compared with particle-level SM predictions from the POWHEG+PYTHIA8, POWHEG+HERWIG7 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO+Pythia8 generators for the combined VBF, ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t}H$ Higgs boson production modes. The shaded box around each data point shows the statistical uncertainty, while the total uncertainty is indicated by the error bar. The contribution from the ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t}H$ production modes as predicted by POWHEG+PYTHIA8 is also shown.

Measured fiducial differential cross-sections as a function of $p_\text{T}^{H}$. The measurements are compared with particle-level SM predictions from the POWHEG+PYTHIA8, POWHEG+HERWIG7 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO+Pythia8 generators for the combined VBF, ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t} H$ Higgs boson production modes. The shaded box around each data point shows the statistical uncertainty, while the total uncertainty is indicated by the error bar. The contribution from the ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t} H$ production modes as predicted by POWHEG+PYTHIA8 is also shown.

Measured fiducial differential cross-sections as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$. The measurements are compared with particle-level SM predictions from the POWHEG+PYTHIA8, POWHEG+HERWIG7 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO+Pythia8 generators for the combined VBF, ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t}H$ Higgs boson production modes. The shaded box around each data point shows the statistical uncertainty, while the total uncertainty is indicated by the error bar. The contribution from the ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t} H$ production modes as predicted by POWHEG+PYTHIA8 is also shown.

Measured fiducial differential cross-sections as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$ vs $p_\text{T}^\text{H}$. The measurements are compared with particle-level SM predictions from the POWHEG+PYTHIA8, POWHEG+HERWIG7 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO+Pythia8 generators for the combined VBF, ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t}H$ Higgs boson production modes. The shaded box around each data point shows the statistical uncertainty, while the total uncertainty is indicated by the error bar. The contribution from the ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t}H$ production modes as predicted by POWHEG+PYTHIA8 is also shown.

The unfolded data compared with the nominal SM predictions from POWHEG+PYTHIA8, as well as the predictions for several values of Wilson coefficients in the SMEFT, for $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$.

The unfolded data compared with the nominal SM predictions from POWHEG+PYTHIA8, as well as the predictions for several values of Wilson coefficients in the SMEFT, for $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$.

The unfolded data compared with the nominal SM predictions from POWHEG+PYTHIA8, as well as the predictions for several values of Wilson coefficients in the SMEFT, for $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$ vs $p_\text{T}^{H}$.

The unfolded data compared with the nominal SM predictions from POWHEG+PYTHIA8, as well as the predictions for several values of Wilson coefficients in the SMEFT, for $p_\text{T}^{H}$.

The 95% expected and observed confidence intervals for each of the six considered Wilson coefficients. Each coefficient is treated individually and both the linear and linear + quadratic models are considered when evaluating the sensitivity to the terms that enter at $\mathcal{O}(\Lambda^{-4})$. For the CP-even operators the $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$ distribution is used to extract the confidence interval. The limits are computed at a new-physics scale $\Lambda=1$ TeV.

The 95% expected and observed confidence intervals for each of the six considered Wilson coefficients. Each coefficient is treated individually and both the linear and linear + quadratic models are considered when evaluating the sensitivity to the terms that enter at $\mathcal{O}(\Lambda^{-4})$. For the CP-odd operators the $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$ vs $p_\text{T}^{H}$ distribution is used to extract the confidence interval. The limits are computed at a new-physics scale $\Lambda=1$ TeV.

Two-dimensional observed and expected limits at 68% and 95% confidence level obtained from $c_{HW}$ and $c_{HB}$ using only the SM-dimension-6 interference in the SMEFT basis. The limits are computed at a new-physics scale $\Lambda$ = 1 TeV. In this case, the $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{signed}$ distribution is used. IMPORTANT: HEPData requires the same number of rows for each column. However, each curve of on the plot has a different number of points. For that reason, the curves are padded with data of "0.0, 0.0". The "0.0, 0.0" points should be omitted in analysis.

Two-dimensional observed and expected limits at 68% and 95% confidence level obtained from $c_{H\tilde{W}}$ and $c_{H\tilde{B}}$ using only the SM-dimension-6 interference in the SMEFT basis. The limits are computed at a new-physics scale $\Lambda$ = 1 TeV. In this purely CP-odd case, the $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{signed}$ vs $p_{T}^{H}$ distribution is used. IMPORTANT: HEPData requires the same number of rows for each column. However, each curve of on the plot has a different number of points. For that reason, the curves are padded with data of "0.0, 0.0". The "0.0, 0.0" points should be omitted in analysis.

Two-dimensional observed and expected limits at 68% and 95% confidence level obtained from $c_{HW}$ and $c_{H\tilde{W}}$ using only the SM-dimension-6 interference in the SMEFT basis. The limits are computed at a new-physics scale $\Lambda$ = 1 TeV. In this case, the $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{signed}$ distribution is used. IMPORTANT: HEPData requires the same number of rows for each column. However, each curve of on the plot has a different number of points. For that reason, the curves are padded with data of "0.0, 0.0". The "0.0, 0.0" points should be omitted in analysis.

The expected values of $\sigma_{H}\times B(H\rightarrow\tau\tau)$ relative to the SM expectations in the total (labelled as 'Combined') and per-production-mode fit. The total $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty in each measurement is indicated by the error bar. The total systematic uncertainty in each measurement is also indicated.

The expected values for $\sigma_{H}\times B(H\rightarrow\tau\tau)$ relative to the SM expectations in the simplified template cross-section measurement. The total $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty in each measurement is indicated by the error bar. The total systematic uncertainty in each measurement is also indicated.

The measured values for $\sigma_{H}\times B(H\rightarrow\tau\tau)$ in the simplified template cross-section measurement. The total $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty in the measurement is indicated by the black error bars, with the individual contribution from the statistical uncertainty in blue.

The measured correlations between differential fiducial cross-sections, $\sigma$, and the normalisation factors, $\alpha$, for the $Z(\to\tau\tau) + \text{jets}$ and top backgrounds for $p_\text{T}(j_0)$. The bins denoted as $\sigma_{1,2,3,4}$ correspond to the measurements in the four bins listed elsewhere for each observable.

The measured correlations between differential fiducial cross-sections, $\sigma$, and the normalisation factors, $\alpha$, for the $Z(\to\tau\tau) + \text{jets}$ and top backgrounds for $p_\text{T}^{H}}$. The bins denoted as $\sigma_{1,2,3,4}$ correspond to the measurements in the four bins listed elsewhere for each observable.

The measured correlations between differential fiducial cross-sections, $\sigma$, and the normalisation factors, $\alpha$, for the $Z(\to\tau\tau) + \text{jets}$ and top backgrounds for $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$. The bins denoted as $\sigma_{1,2,3,4}$ correspond to the measurements in the four bins listed elsewhere for each observable.

The measured correlations between differential fiducial cross-sections, $\sigma$, and the normalisation factors, $\alpha$, for the $Z(\to\tau\tau) + \text{jets}$ and top backgrounds for $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$ vs $p_\text{T}^{H}$. The bins denoted as $\sigma_{1,2,3,4}$ correspond to the measurements in the four bins listed elsewhere for each observable.

Transverse momentum spectrum of charged hadrons measured at midrapidity ($|y|<0.5$) in INEL>0 pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV for different flattenicity event classes selected with the V0M estimator at forward rapidity (top figure, upper panel)

Transverse momentum spectrum of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ measured at midrapidity ($|y|<0.5$) in INEL>0 pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV for different flattenicity event classes and HM events (0--1% V0M) in the same flattenicity event classes (bottom figure, upper panel)

Transverse momentum spectrum of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ measured at midrapidity ($|y|<0.5$) in INEL>0 pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV for different flattenicity event classes and HM events (0--1% V0M) in the same flattenicity event classes (bottom figure, upper panel)

Transverse momentum spectrum of $p + \overline{p}$ measured at midrapidity ($|y|<0.5$) in INEL>0 pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV for different flattenicity event classes and HM events (0--1% V0M) in the same flattenicity event classes (bottom figure, upper panel)

Transverse momentum spectrum of charged hadrons measured at midrapidity ($|y|<0.5$) in INEL>0 pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV for different flattenicity event classes and HM events (0--1% V0M) in the same flattenicity event classes (bottom figure, upper panel)

The $p_{\rm T}$-differential $(K^{+} + K^{-})/(\pi^{+}+\pi^{-})$ particle ratio for two extremes of flattenicity event classes measured in multiplicity-integrated events in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

The $p_{\rm T}$-differential $(p + \overline{p})$/($\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$) particle ratio for two extremes of flattenicity event classes measured in multiplicity-integrated events in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

The $p_{\rm T}$-differential $(K^{+} + K^{-})/(\pi^{+}+\pi^{-})$ particle ratio for two extremes of flattenicity event classes measured in the 0-1% V0M event class in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

The $p_{\rm T}$-differential $(p + \overline{p})$/($\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$) particle ratio for two extremes of flattenicity event classes measured in the 0-1% V0M event class in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

Transverse momentum-integrated $(K^{+} + K^{-})/(\pi^{+}+\pi^{-})$ particle ratio as a function of the average charged-particle density calculated for different flattenicity event classes in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

Transverse momentum-integrated $(p + \overline{p})$/($\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$) particle ratio as a function of the average charged-particle density calculated for different flattenicity event classes in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

Average transverse momentum of $\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$ as a function of the average charged-particle density calculated for different flattenicity event classes in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

Average transverse momentum of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ as a function of the average charged-particle density calculated for different flattenicity event classes in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

Average transverse momentum of $p + \overline{p}$ as a function of the average charged-particle density calculated for different flattenicity event classes in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

The cutflow table for $N1$ and $N2$ signal samples for different mass points. The samples consist of both $ee$ and $\mu\mu$ final states in equal ratio. Each sample is normalized to a total cross-section of 0.1 pb. The abbreviations used in the table are, SC = Same Charge, SF = Same Flavor.

The cutflow table for $N3$ signal samples for different mass points. The samples consist of both $ee$ and $\mu\mu$ final states in equal ratio. Each sample is normalized to a total cross-section of 10 pb. The abbreviations used in the table are, SS = Same Charge, SF = Same Flavor.

Expected and observed upper limits on the strength of HNL mixing with electron neutrinos

Expected and observed upper limits on the strength of HNL mixing with muon neutrinos

Expected and observed upper limits on the strength of HNL mixing with tau neutrinos

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representation assuming $\kappa$=0.5. The expected limits for the individual analyses are shown. The $HtZt$ analysis is only included in the limit calculation for $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ < 2.1 TeV.

Observed 95% CL exclusion limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of the universal coupling constant and the $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representation. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma/m_{\mathrm{T}}$ < 50%, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Expected 95% CL exclusion limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of the universal coupling constant and the $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representation. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma/m_{\mathrm{T}}$ < 50%, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Observed 95% CL exclusion limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of the universal coupling constant and the $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representation. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma/m_{\mathrm{T}}$ < 50%, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Expected 95% CL exclusion limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of the universal coupling constant and the $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representation. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma/m_{\mathrm{T}}$ < 50%, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Obs.Comb 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.Comb 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$+1\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$-1\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$+2\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$-2\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.OSML 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.HTZT 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.Monotop 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Obs.Comb 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.Comb 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$+1\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$-1\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$+2\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$-2\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.OSML 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.HTZT 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Observed upper limits at 95% CL on the $T$ quark mass as a function of the relative resonance width ($\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}}$) and the relative coupling parameter $\xi_W$.

Expected upper limits at 95% CL on the $T$ quark mass as a function of the relative resonance width ($\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}}$) and the relative coupling parameter $\xi_W$.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representation assuming $\kappa$=0.7. The expected limits for the individual analyses are shown.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representation assuming $\kappa$=0.7. The expected limits for the individual analyses are shown.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representation assuming $\kappa$=0.3. The observed limits for the individual analyses are shown. The $HtZt$ analysis is only included in the limit calculation for $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ < 2.1 TeV.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representation assuming $\kappa$=0.5. The observed limits for the individual analyses are shown. The $HtZt$ analysis is only included in the limit calculation for $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ < 2.1 TeV.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representation assuming $\kappa$=0.7. The observed limits for the individual analyses are shown.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representation assuming $\kappa$=0.3. The observed limits for the individual analyses are shown. The $HtZt$ analysis is only included in the limit calculation for $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ < 2.1 TeV.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representation assuming $\kappa$=0.5. The observed limits for the individual analyses are shown. The $HtZt$ analysis is only included in the limit calculation for $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ < 2.1 TeV.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representation assuming $\kappa$=0.7. The observed limits for the individual analyses are shown.

Obs.Comb 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.Comb 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$+1\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$-1\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$+2\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$-2\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Obs.OSML 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Obs.HTZT 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Obs.Monotop 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Obs.Comb 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.Comb 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$+1\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$-1\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$+2\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Exp.$-2\sigma$ for the 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Obs.OSML 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Obs.HTZT 95% CL exclusion limits on the universal coupling constant $\kappa$ as a function of the $T$ quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representations for the combination. Limits are only presented in the regime $\Gamma_{\mathrm{T}}/m_{\mathrm{T}} < 50\%$, where the theory calculations are known to be valid.

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$ and $1.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$ and $2.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 3.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$. The multiplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$ and $1.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$ and $2.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 3.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$ and $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$. The multiplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $1.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. The multiplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $2.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 3.0$ GeV/$c$ and $1.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $2.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 3.0$ GeV/$c$. The multiplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$ and $1.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$ and $2.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 3.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$. The multiplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$ and $1.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$ and $2.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 3.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$ and $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the near-side width $\sigma$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$. The multiplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $1.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $2.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 3.0$ GeV/$c$ and $1.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $2.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 3.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$ and $1.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$ and $2.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 3.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$ and $1.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$ and $2.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 3.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$ and $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with midrapidity multiplicity estimator ($|\eta|<1.0,\,p_\mathrm{T}>0.2$ GeV/$c$).

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $1.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $2.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 3.0$ GeV/$c$ and $1.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $2.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 3.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$ and $1.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$ and $2.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 3.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$ and $1.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$ and $2.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 3.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$ and $3.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < 4.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Multiplicity dependence of the fragmentation yield $Y^{frag}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 13$ TeV. Obtained in transverse momentum intervals $4.0 < p_\mathrm{T, assoc} < p_\mathrm{T, trig} < 8.0$ GeV/$c$. The mulitplicity is estimated with forward multiplicity estimator.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[8(\Psi_8-\Psi_2)]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[8(\Psi_8-\Psi_4)]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[6(\Psi_6-\Psi_2)]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[6(\Psi_6-\Psi_3)]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+3\Psi_3-5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+6\Psi_3-8\Psi_4]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[3\Psi_3+5\Psi_5-8\Psi_8]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[8\Psi_2-3\Psi_3-5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+4\Psi_4-6\Psi_6]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+5\Psi_5-7\Psi_7]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2-6\Psi_3+4\Psi_4]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[3\Psi_3+4\Psi_4-7\Psi_7]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[4\Psi_2+3\Psi_3-7\Psi_7]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[4\Psi_2+4\Psi_4-8\Psi_8]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[3\Psi_3-8\Psi_4+5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[9\Psi_3-4\Psi_4-5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2-3\Psi_3-4\Psi_4+5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[4\Psi_2+6\Psi_3-4\Psi_4-6\Psi_6]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[6\Psi_2+3\Psi_3-4\Psi_4-5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[4\Psi_2-3\Psi_3+4\Psi_4-5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2-4\Psi_4-5\Psi_5+7\Psi_7]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+3\Psi_3-4\Psi_4+5\Psi_5-6\Psi_6]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of ($\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+6\Psi_3-8\Psi_4]\rangle$+$\langle\cos[6(\Psi_3-\Psi_2)]\rangle$)/2 in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[4(\Psi_4-\Psi_2)]\rangle\times\langle\cos[2\Psi_2-6\Psi_3+4\Psi_4]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of ($\langle\cos[9\Psi_3-4\Psi_4-5\Psi_5]\rangle$+$\langle\cos[4\Psi_2-3\Psi_3+4\Psi_4-5\Psi_5]\rangle$)/2 in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[2\Psi_2-6\Psi_3+4\Psi_4]\rangle\times\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+3\Psi_3-5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of ($\langle\cos[2\Psi_2-3\Psi_3-4\Psi_4+5\Psi_5]\rangle$+$\langle\cos[6\Psi_2+3\Psi_3-4\Psi_4-5\Psi_5]\rangle$)/2 in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[4(\Psi_4-\Psi_2)]\rangle\times\langle\cos[2\Psi_2+3\Psi_3-5\Psi_5]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of ($\langle\cos[8(\Psi_8-\Psi_2)]\rangle$+$\langle\cos[8(\Psi_8-\Psi_4)]\rangle$)/2 in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Centrality dependence of $\langle\cos[4(\Psi_4-\Psi_2)]\rangle\times\langle\cos[4\Psi_2+4\Psi_4-8\Psi_8]\rangle$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for non-prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for non-prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for near side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $0.15<p_T<1$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $1<p_T<3$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for inclusive J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the MB and EMCal event samples.

Pythia calculations for away side asociated charged particle yield per trigger in the range $3<p_T<10$ GeV/$c$ for non prompt J/$\psi$, as a function of $p_T$, using the HM event samples.

Post-fit agreement between data and MC prediction for the $SR_{\mathrm{loose}}^{2\ell3j}$ signal region, which uses the invariant mass of the c-tagged jet and the geometrically closest b-tagged jet, $m_{\mathit{cb}}^{\mathrm{min}\Delta R}$, as an observable. The hatched uncertainty bands include all uncertainties and their correlations. The last bins contain overflow events. "Other Top" includes single-top-quark production and associated production of $t\bar{t}$ and single top quarks with bosons. "Non-Top" includes W+jets, Z+jets, and diboson processes.

Post-fit agreement between data and MC prediction for the $SR_{\mathrm{loose}}^{1\ell6ji}$ signal region, which uses the jet multiplicity, $N_{\mathrm{jets}}$, as an observable. The hatched uncertainty bands include all uncertainties and their correlations. The last bins contain overflow events. "Other Top" includes single-top-quark production and associated production of $t\bar{t}$ and single top quarks with bosons. "Non-Top" includes W+jets, Z+jets, and diboson processes.

Post-fit agreement between data and MC prediction for the $SR_{\mathrm{tight}}^{1\ell6ji}$ signal region, which uses the jet multiplicity, $N_{\mathrm{jets}}$, as an observable. The hatched uncertainty bands include all uncertainties and their correlations. The last bins contain overflow events. "Other Top" includes single-top-quark production and associated production of $t\bar{t}$ and single top quarks with bosons. "Non-Top" includes W+jets, Z+jets, and diboson processes.

Post-fit agreement between data and MC prediction for the $SR_{\mathrm{loose}}^{2\ell4ji}$ signal region, which uses the jet multiplicity, $N_{\mathrm{jets}}$, as an observable. The hatched uncertainty bands include all uncertainties and their correlations. The last bins contain overflow events. "Other Top" includes single-top-quark production and associated production of $t\bar{t}$ and single top quarks with bosons. "Non-Top" includes W+jets, Z+jets, and diboson processes.

Post-fit agreement between data and MC prediction for the $SR_{\mathrm{tight}}^{2\ell4ji}$ signal region, which uses the jet multiplicity, $N_{\mathrm{jets}}$, as an observable. The hatched uncertainty bands include all uncertainties and their correlations. The last bins contain overflow events. "Other Top" includes single-top-quark production and associated production of $t\bar{t}$ and single top quarks with bosons. "Non-Top" includes W+jets, Z+jets, and diboson processes.

Jet multiplicity and tagging criteria for the SRs and CRs in the single-lepton and dilepton channels. All single-lepton regions are defined in the 5-jet-exclusive and 6-jet-inclusive jet selections, all dilepton regions in the 3-jet-exclusive and 4-jet-inclusive jet selections. By construction, $\mathrm{SR}^{2\ell}_{\mathrm{tight}}$ only exists for the 4-jet-inclusive selection. Identical requirements on inclusive and exclusive working points, e.g., one c@22% and one c@11% in the $\mathrm{CR}_1^{1\ell}$, indicate a veto of additional tags at the inclusive working point.

Breakdown of the fiducial $t\bar{t}+{\geq}2c$ and $t\bar{t}+1c$ cross-section uncertainties. Systematic uncertainties are grouped into signal and background modeling, instrumental, and MC statistics categories. The table lists the fractional uncertainty in the measured cross-sections in percent and is estimated from the covariance matrix of the profile likelihood fit, following EPJC 84 (2024) 593. Individual groups of uncertainties can be added in quadrature to obtain the total uncertainty. JES and JER denote the jet energy scale and resolution uncertainties, respectively. The fractional uncertainties in the fitted $t\bar{t}+{\geq}1c$ and $t\bar{t}+\text{light}$ normalization factors are included in the data statistics category. For presentation purposes, all uncertainties are symmetrized.

Measured fiducial cross-section values in comparison with various NLO+PS predictions. The uncertainties in the predictions include independent and simultaneous variations of the $\mu_R$ and $\mu_F$ scales and uncertainties in the choice of the PDF set, but no uncertainties in the parton shower or hadronization. The uncertainties in the measured values include all statistical and systematic uncertainties. For presentation purposes, the quoted measurement and prediction uncertainties are symmetrized.

Measured and predicted values for the $t\bar{t}+{\geq}1b$, $t\bar{t}+{\geq}2c$, and $t\bar{t}+1c$ cross-sections and for the cross-section ratios of these processes to total $t\bar{t}+\text{jets}$ production. The quoted uncertainties in the measurements include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The predictions are taken from the nominal setup using inclusive $t\bar{t}$ Powheg+Pythia8 predictions for the $t\bar{t}+{\geq}2c$, $t\bar{t}+1c$, and $t\bar{t}+\text{light}$ processes, and $t\bar{t}+b\bar{b}$ Powheg+Pythia8 predictions for the $t\bar{t}+{\geq}1b$ process. The first use the 5FS, the latter the 4FS, where the $b$-quarks are treated as massive particles and are included in the matrix element calculation. The uncertainties in the predictions include independent and simultaneous variations of the $\mu_R$ and $\mu_F$ scales and uncertainties in the choice of the PDF set.

Nuisance parameters with a large impact on the fiducial measurement: ranking of the ten most impactful nuisance parameters for the $t\bar{t}+{\geq}2c$ cross-section measurement. The colored boxes indicate the impact of the nuisance parameters, $\Delta\mu$ (top axis), on the corresponding parameter of interest, $\mu$. They are calculated from the covariance matrix using the post-fit up (down) uncertainties of the parameter of interest and the nuisance parameter, $\sigma_{\mathrm{POI}}^{\mathrm{up}}$ and $\sigma_{\mathrm{NP}}^{\mathrm{up}}$ ($\sigma_{\mathrm{POI}}^{\mathrm{down}}$ and $\sigma_{\mathrm{NP}}^{\mathrm{down}}$), and their linear correlation coefficient, $\rho$, following EPJC 84 (2024) 593. The data points and error bars indicate the post-fit values and uncertainties of the nuisance parameters relative to their pre-fit values, $\theta_0$, in units of their pre-fit uncertainties, $\Delta \theta$ (bottom axis). A hollow circle indicates that the nuisance parameter has a Poisson constraint.

Nuisance parameters with a large impact on the fiducial measurement: ranking of the ten most impactful nuisance parameters for the $t\bar{t}+1c$ cross-section measurement. The colored boxes indicate the impact of the nuisance parameters, $\Delta\mu$ (top axis), on the corresponding parameter of interest, $\mu$. They are calculated from the covariance matrix using the post-fit up (down) uncertainties of the parameter of interest and the nuisance parameter, $\sigma_{\mathrm{POI}}^{\mathrm{up}}$ and $\sigma_{\mathrm{NP}}^{\mathrm{up}}$ ($\sigma_{\mathrm{POI}}^{\mathrm{down}}$ and $\sigma_{\mathrm{NP}}^{\mathrm{down}}$), and their linear correlation coefficient, $\rho$, following EPJC 84 (2024) 593. The data points and error bars indicate the post-fit values and uncertainties of the nuisance parameters relative to their pre-fit values, $\theta_0$, in units of their pre-fit uncertainties, $\Delta \theta$ (bottom axis). A hollow circle indicates that the nuisance parameter has a Poisson constraint.

Nuisance parameters with a large impact on the fiducial measurement: ranking of the ten most impactful nuisance parameters for the $t\bar{t}+{\geq}2c$ ratio to total $t\bar{t}+\text{jets}$ production. The colored boxes indicate the impact of the nuisance parameters, $\Delta\mu$ (top axis), on the corresponding parameter of interest, $\mu$. They are calculated from the covariance matrix using the post-fit up (down) uncertainties of the parameter of interest and the nuisance parameter, $\sigma_{\mathrm{POI}}^{\mathrm{up}}$ and $\sigma_{\mathrm{NP}}^{\mathrm{up}}$ ($\sigma_{\mathrm{POI}}^{\mathrm{down}}$ and $\sigma_{\mathrm{NP}}^{\mathrm{down}}$), and their linear correlation coefficient, $\rho$, following EPJC 84 (2024) 593. The data points and error bars indicate the post-fit values and uncertainties of the nuisance parameters relative to their pre-fit values, $\theta_0$, in units of their pre-fit uncertainties, $\Delta \theta$ (bottom axis). A hollow circle indicates that the nuisance parameter has a Poisson constraint.

Nuisance parameters with a large impact on the fiducial measurement: ranking of the ten most impactful nuisance parameters for the $t\bar{t}+1c$ ratio to total $t\bar{t}+\text{jets}$ production. The colored boxes indicate the impact of the nuisance parameters, $\Delta\mu$ (top axis), on the corresponding parameter of interest, $\mu$. They are calculated from the covariance matrix using the post-fit up (down) uncertainties of the parameter of interest and the nuisance parameter, $\sigma_{\mathrm{POI}}^{\mathrm{up}}$ and $\sigma_{\mathrm{NP}}^{\mathrm{up}}$ ($\sigma_{\mathrm{POI}}^{\mathrm{down}}$ and $\sigma_{\mathrm{NP}}^{\mathrm{down}}$), and their linear correlation coefficient, $\rho$, following EPJC 84 (2024) 593. The data points and error bars indicate the post-fit values and uncertainties of the nuisance parameters relative to their pre-fit values, $\theta_0$, in units of their pre-fit uncertainties, $\Delta \theta$ (bottom axis). A hollow circle indicates that the nuisance parameter has a Poisson constraint.

Efficiencies and rejection rates for the $b$- and $c$-jet tagging working points of the $b/c$-tagger, as well as the selection cuts on the discriminants, $\mathcal{D}_b'$ and $\mathcal{D}_c'$ that define the tagging bins. The primes indicate that a standard logistic function is applied to the discriminants. The b@70% and c@22% working points are inclusive of their respective tighter working points. The values were estimated from single-lepton and dilepton $t\bar{t}$ events simulated with Powheg + Pythia 8.

Efficiencies and rejection rates for the $b$- and $c$-jet tagging working points of the $b/c$-tagger, as well as the selection cuts on the discriminants, $\mathcal{D}_b'$ and $\mathcal{D}_c'$ that define the tagging bins. The primes indicate that a standard logistic function is applied to the discriminants. The b@70% and c@22% working points are inclusive of their respective tighter working points. The values were estimated from single-lepton and dilepton $t\bar{t}$ events simulated with Powheg + Pythia 8.

Pre-fit event yields in the twelve single-lepton and dilepton control regions (CRs) of the analysis. The quoted uncertainties include both statistical and systematic components, but all normalization factors are fixed to their pre-fit values with no uncertainties. All uncertainties are assumed to be uncorrelated. "Other Top" includes single-top-quark production and associated production of $t\bar{t}$ and single top quarks with bosons. "Non-Top" includes W+jets, Z+jets, and diboson processes. The "Fakes" category includes events from misidentified leptons and non-prompt leptons, estimated through the data-driven matrix method in the single-lepton channel and through MC predictions in the dilepton channel.

Pre-fit event yields in the seven signal regions (SRs) of the analysis. The quoted uncertainties include both statistical and systematic components, but all normalization factors are fixed to their pre-fit values with no uncertainties. All uncertainties are assumed to be uncorrelated. "Other Top" includes single-top-quark production and associated production of $t\bar{t}$ and single top quarks with bosons. "Non-Top" includes W+jets, Z+jets, and diboson processes. The "Fakes" category includes events from misidentified leptons and non-prompt leptons, estimated through the data-driven matrix method in the single-lepton channel and through MC predictions in the dilepton channel.

Post-fit event yields in the twelve single-lepton and dilepton control regions (CRs) of the analysis. The quoted uncertainties include both statistical and systematic components, and post-fit correlations between uncertainties are taken into account. "Other Top" includes single-top-quark production and associated production of $t\bar{t}$ and single top quarks with bosons. "Non-Top" includes W+jets, Z+jets, and diboson processes. The "Fakes" category includes events from misidentified leptons and non-prompt leptons, estimated through the data-driven matrix method in the single-lepton channel and through MC predictions in the dilepton channel.

Post-fit event yields in the seven signal regions (SRs) of the analysis. The quoted uncertainties include both statistical and systematic components, and post-fit correlations between uncertainties are taken into account. "Other Top" includes single-top-quark production and associated production of $t\bar{t}$ and single top quarks with bosons. "Non-Top" includes W+jets, Z+jets, and diboson processes. The "Fakes" category includes events from misidentified leptons and non-prompt leptons, estimated through the data-driven matrix method in the single-lepton channel and through MC predictions in the dilepton channel.