HEPData Search

Figure 3

(Color online) $\Delta RMS^{\Delta Q}/\langle RMS^{\Delta Q}\rangle$ versus centrality for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. Not corrected for event plane resolution. Errors are statistical only.

Figure 4

(Color online) $\langle sin(\phi_{\alpha} − \Psi_{1})\rangle$ for positive and negative charges versus centrality for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. Shaded area represents the systematic uncertainty for both charge types obtained by comparing correlations from positive and negative pseudorapidity.

Figure 5

(Color online) Three-point correlator, Eq. 1, measured with $1^{st}$ and $2^{nd}$ harmonic event planes versus centrality for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. Shown with crosses are our previous results from the 2004 RHIC run (Y4) [9, 10]. The Y4 run used a second harmonic event plane. Y4 and Y7 $\Psi_{2}$ results are consistent within statistical errors. Shaded areas for the $2^{nd}$ harmonic points represent the systematic uncertainty of the event plane determination. Systematic uncertainties for the $1^{st}$ harmonic points are negligible compared to the statistical ones shown.

Figure 6

(Color online) Modulated sign correlations (msc) compared to the three-point correlator versus centrality for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. Shown with triangles is the msc, Eq. 5. The systematic uncertainties will be shown in detail in Fig. 7. Diamonds and circles show the three-point correlator, Eq. 1, and the grey bars reflect the conditions of $\Delta p_{T}$ > 0.15 GeV/c and $\Delta\eta$ > 0.15 applied to the three-point correlator, to be discussed in the text. For comparison, the model calculation of THERMINATOR [21] is also shown.

Figure 7 a

(Color online) The msc split into 2 composite parts versus centrality for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. Shaded areas represent the systematic uncertainty due to the event plane determination. For comparison with the $\Delta$msc term, we also put $−\nu_{2}/N$ and the model calculation of MEVSIM [24], to be described in the text.

Figure 7 b

(Color online) The msc split into 2 composite parts versus centrality for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. Shaded areas represent the systematic uncertainty due to the event plane determination. For comparison with the $\Delta$msc term, we also put $−\nu_{2}/N$ and the model calculation of MEVSIM [24], to be described in the text.

Figure 8 a

(Color online) Three-point correlations split up into out-of-plane $(\langle sin(\Delta\phi_{\alpha}) sin(\Delta\phi_{\beta})\rangle)$ and in-plane $(\langle cos(\Delta\phi_{\alpha}) cos(\Delta\phi_{\beta})\rangle)$ composite parts for 40 − 60% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ GeV. (a)shows the correlations versus $\langle\eta\rangle$ = $(\eta_{\alpha}+\eta_{\beta})/2$. (b) shows the correlations versus $|\Delta\eta|$ = $|\eta_{\alpha}-\eta_{\beta}|$. Statistical errors are smaller than the symbol size. Systematic errors are given by the shaded bands and apply only to the difference of in-plane and out-of-plane parts.

Figure 8 b

(Color online) Three-point correlations split up into out-of-plane $(\langle sin(\Delta\phi_{\alpha}) sin(\Delta\phi_{\beta})\rangle)$ and in-plane $(\langle cos(\Delta\phi_{\alpha}) cos(\Delta\phi_{\beta})\rangle)$ composite parts for 40 − 60% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ GeV. (a)shows the correlations versus $\langle\eta\rangle$ = $(\eta_{\alpha}+\eta_{\beta})/2$. (b) shows the correlations versus $|\Delta\eta|$ = $|\eta_{\alpha}-\eta_{\beta}|$. Statistical errors are smaller than the symbol size. Systematic errors are given by the shaded bands and apply only to the difference of in-plane and out-of-plane parts.

Figure 9 a

(Color online) Three-point correlations split up into out-of-plane and in-plane composite parts for 40 − 60% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. (a) shows the correlatios versus $\langle p_{T}\rangle$ = $(p_{T,\alpha}+p_{T,\beta})/2$. (b) shows the correlations versus $|\Delta p_{T}|$ = $|p_{T,\alpha}-p_{T,\beta}|$. Statistical errors are smaller than the symbol size. Systematic errors are given by the shaded bands and apply only to the difference of in-plane and out-of-plane parts.

Figure 9 b

(Color online) Three-point correlations split up into out-of-plane and in-plane composite parts for 40 − 60% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. (a) shows the correlatios versus $\langle p_{T}\rangle$ = $(p_{T,\alpha}+p_{T,\beta})/2$. (b) shows the correlations versus $|\Delta p_{T}|$ = $|p_{T,\alpha}-p_{T,\beta}|$. Statistical errors are smaller than the symbol size. Systematic errors are given by the shaded bands and apply only to the difference of in-plane and out-of-plane parts.

Date

Collaboration

Subject_areas

Reactions

Observables Reset

CM Energies (GeV)

Authors Reset

Fluctuations of charge separation perpendicular to the event plane and local parity violation in sqrt(sNN)=200 GeV Au+Au collisions at RHIC