HEPData Search

Max results

Sort by

relevance
collaborations
title
date
latest

Reverse order

Showing 1 of 1 results

Date

Collaboration

LHCB 1

Subject_areas

hep-ex 1

Phrases

Azymuthal Angular Dependence 1
Cross Section 1
Di-Muon Production 1
Double Differential Cross Section 1
Integrated Cross Section 1
Rapidity Dependence 1
Single Differential Cross Section 1
Transverse Momentum Dependence 1
Z Production 1

Reset Show 9 Next 5

Reactions

P P --> Z0 <MU+ MU-> X 1

Observables Reset

D2SIG/DYRAP/DPHI 1
D2SIG/DYRAP/DPT 1
DSIG/DPHI 1
DSIG/DPT 1
DSIG/DYRAP 1
SIG 1

Reset Show 6 Next 5

CM Energies (GeV)

0.0 ≤ √s < 1.0
1.0 ≤ √s < 2.0
2.0 ≤ √s < 5.0
5.0 ≤ √s < 10.0
10.0 ≤ √s < 100.0
100.0 ≤ √s < 1000.0
1000.0 ≤ √s < 7000.0
7000.0 ≤ √s < 8000.0
8000.0 ≤ √s < 13000.0
√s ≥ 13000.0

Reset Show 10 Next 5

Authors Reset

Aaij, R. 1
Abdelmotteleb, A.S.W. 1
Abellán Beteta, C. 1
Abrantes, F. Goncalves 1
Abudinén, F. 1
Ackernley, T. 1
Adeva, B. 1
Adinolfi, M. 1
Afsharnia, H. 1
Agapopoulou, C. 1
Aidala, C.A. 1
Aiola, S. 1
Ajaltouni, Z. 1
Akar, S. 1
Albero, A. Alfonso 1
Albrecht, J. 1
Alessio, F. 1
Alexander, M. 1
Aliouche, Z. 1
Alkhazov, G. 1

Reset Show 20 Next 5

Version 2

rivet Analysis
Precision measurement of forward $Z$ boson production in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV

The LHCb collaboration Aaij, R. ; Abdelmotteleb, A.S.W. ; Abellán Beteta, C. ; et al.

JHEP 07 (2022) 026, 2022.

https://inspirehep.net/literature/1990313 Inspire Record 1990313 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.132011 https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.132011

A precision measurement of the $Z$ boson production cross-section at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV in the forward region is presented, using $pp$ collision data collected by the LHCb detector, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.1 fb$^{-1}$. The production cross-section is measured using $Z\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^-$ events within the fiducial region defined as pseudorapidity $2.0<\eta<4.5$ and transverse momentum $p_{T}>20$ GeV/$c$ for both muons and dimuon invariant mass $60

27 data tables

Table 1

Relative uncertainty for the integrated $Z -> \mu^{+} \mu^{-}$ cross-section measurement. The total uncertainty is the quadratic sum of uncertainties from statistical, systematic and luminosity contributions.

Table 2

Final state radiation correction used in the $y^{Z}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Table 3

Final state radiation correction used in the $p_{T}^{Z}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Table 4

Final state radiation correction used in the $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Table 5

Final state radiation correction used in the $y^{Z}-p_{T}^{Z}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Table 6

Final state radiation correction used in the $y^{Z}-\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ cross-section measurement. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic.

Table 7

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for one-dimensional $y^Z$ measurement.

Table 8

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for one-dimensional $p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Table 9

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for one-dimensional $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Figure 13 (left)

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Figure 13 (right)

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Table 10

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for one-dimensional $y^Z$ measurement.

Table 11

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for one-dimensional $p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Table 12

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for one-dimensional $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Figure 15 (left)

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-p_{T}^{Z}$ measurement.

Figure 15 (right)

Correlation matrix of efficiency uncertainty for two-dimensional $y^Z-\phi_{\eta}^{*}$ measurement.

Table 13

Measured total $Z$-boson cross-section for different datasets. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Table 14

Measured single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Table 15

Measured single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $p_{T}^{Z}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Table 16

Measured single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Table 17

Measured double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $p_{T}^{Z}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Table 18

Measured double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to the luminosity.

Table 19

Systematic uncertainties in the single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Table 20

Systematic uncertainties in the single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $p_{T}^{Z}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Table 21

Systematic uncertainties in the single differential cross-sections in interval regions of $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Table 22

Systematic uncertainties in the double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $p_{T}^{Z}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

Table 23

Systematic uncertainties in the double differential cross-sections in interval regions of $y^{Z}$ and $\phi_{\eta}^{*}$, presented in percentage. The contributions from efficiency (Eff), background (BKG), final state radiation (FSR), closure test (Closure), and alignment and calibration (Alignment) are shown.

More…