The production of $D^{\pm}$ and $D_{s}^{\pm}$ charmed mesons is measured using the $D^{\pm}/D_{s}^{\pm} \to ϕ(μμ)π^{\pm}$ decay channel with 137 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV proton-proton collision data collected with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider during the years 2016-2018. The charmed mesons are reconstructed in the range of transverse momentum $12 < p_\mathrm{T} < 100$ GeV and pseudorapidity $|η| < 2.5$. The differential cross-sections are measured as a function of transverse momentum and pseudorapidity, and compared with next-to-leading-order QCD predictions. The predictions are found to be consistent with the measurements in the visible kinematic region within the large theoretical uncertainties.
The measured differential cross-sections and the predictions from GM-VFNS and FONLL calculations for the $D^\pm$ meson in bins of $|\eta|$. The statistical, systematic (excluding branching ratio) and branching ratio uncertainties are shown separately for data, while the total theory uncertainties are shown for GM-VFNS and FONLL.
The measured differential cross-sections and the predictions from GM-VFNS and FONLL calculations for the $D^\pm$ meson in bins of $p_T$ for $|\eta| < 2.5$. The statistical, systematic (excluding branching ratio) and branching ratio uncertainties are shown separately for data, while the total theory uncertainties are shown for GM-VFNS and FONLL.
The measured differential cross-sections and the predictions from the GM-VFNS calculation for the $D_s^\pm$ meson in bins of $|\eta|$. The statistical, systematic (excluding branching ratio) and branching ratio uncertainties are shown separately for data, while the total theory uncertainties are shown for GM-VFNS.
A measurement of the $B^{0}$ meson lifetime and related properties using $B^0 \to J/ψK^{*0}$ decays in data from 13 TeV proton-proton collisions with an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$ recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC is presented. The measured effective lifetime is $$ τ= 1.5053 \pm 0.0012 ~\mathrm{(stat.)} \pm 0.0035 ~\mathrm{(syst.)~ps}. $$ The average decay width extracted from the effective lifetime, using parameters from external sources, is $$ Γ_d = 0.6639 \pm 0.0005 ~\mathrm{(stat.)} \pm 0.0016 ~\mathrm{(syst.)}\pm 0.0038 ~\textrm{(ext.)} \textrm{ ps}^{-1}, $$ where the uncertainties are statistical, systematic and from external sources. The earlier ATLAS measurement of $Γ_s$ in the $B^0_s \to J/ψϕ$ decay was used to derive a value for the ratio of the average decay widths $Γ_d$ and $Γ_s$ for $B^{0}$ and $B_s^{0}$ mesons respectively, of $$ \frac{Γ_d }{Γ_s } = 0.9905 \pm 0.0022 ~\textrm{(stat.)} \pm 0.0036 ~\textrm{(syst.)} \pm 0.0057 ~\textrm{(ext.)}. $$ The measured lifetime, average decay width and decay width ratio are in agreement with theoretical predictions and with measurements by other experiments. This measurement provides the most precise result of the effective lifetime of the $B^{0}$ meson to date.
The measured effective lifetime for the $B^0 \rightarrow J/\psi\,K^{*0}$ decay.
The measured average decay width $\Gamma_{d}\,$ extracted from the average lifetime.
The measured ratio $\Gamma_{d} / \Gamma_{s}\,$ of the average decay widths.
The paper presents a search for supersymmetric particles produced in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV and decaying into final states with missing transverse momentum and jets originating from charm quarks. The data were taken with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN from 2015 to 2018 and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. No significant excess of events over the expected Standard Model background expectation is observed in optimized signal regions, and limits are set on the production cross-sections of the supersymmetric particles. Pair production of charm squarks or top squarks, each decaying into a charm quark and the lightest supersymmetric particle $\tilde{\chi}^0_1$, is excluded at 95% confidence level for squarks with masses up to 900 GeV for scenarios where the mass of $\tilde{\chi}^0_1$ is below 50 GeV. Additionally, the production of leptoquarks with masses up to 900 GeV is excluded for the scenario where up-type leptoquarks decay into a charm quark and a neutrino. Model-independent limits on cross-sections and event yields for processes beyond the Standard Model are also reported.
Summary of material in this HEPData record. <br/><br/> Truth Code snippets, SLHA files, Madgraph process cards and UFO files for the leptoquark models are available under "Additional Resources" (purple button on the left). <br/><br/> <b>Contours:</b> <ul> SUSY exclusion limits (best-expected SR combination) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour1">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour3">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour2">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour4">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour5">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour6">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (best-expected SR combination) as a function of $\Delta m(\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour7">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour9">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour8">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour10">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour11">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour12">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (SR-HM1) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour15">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour14">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour13">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour18">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour16">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour17">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (SR-HM2) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour21">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour20">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour19">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour24">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour22">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour23">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (SR-HM3) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour27">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour26">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour25">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour30">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour28">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour29">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (SR-Comp1) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour33">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour32">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour31">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour36">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour34">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour35">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (SR-Comp2) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour39">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour38">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour37">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour42">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour40">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour41">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (SR-Comp3) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour45">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour44">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour43">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour48">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour46">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour47">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (SR-Comp-1c) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour50">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour49">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (scan over branching fraction for $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)=1$ GeV) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour51">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour53">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour52">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour54">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour55">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour56">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> SUSY exclusion limits (scan over branching fraction for $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)=200$ GeV) <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour57">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour59">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour58">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour60">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour61">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour62">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{21}$ exclusion limits <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour65">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour64">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour63">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour68">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour66">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour67">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{22}$ exclusion limits <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour71">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour70">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour69">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour74">Observed</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour72">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Contour73">-1$\sigma$</a> <br/> </ul> </ul> <b>Cross-section upper limits:</b> <ul> SUSY signals (best-expected SR combination): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit1">Observed</a> <br/> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{21}$ (combined High-Mass SRs): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit2">Observed</a> <br/> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{22}$ (combined High-Mass SRs): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit3">Observed</a> <br/> $U(1)$ pair (min) (combined High-Mass SRs): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit6">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit5">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit4">-1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit7">Observed</a> <br/> $U(1)$ pair (YM) (combined High-Mass SRs): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit10">Expected</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit9">+1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit8">-1$\sigma$</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cross-sectionupperlimit11">Observed</a> <br/> </ul> <b>Signal region distributions:</b> <ul> <a href="155678?version=1&table=SRdistribution2">$E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$ Sig. in SR-HM1</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=SRdistribution3">$m_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{min}(c)$ in SR-HM2</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=SRdistribution4">$R_\mathrm{ISR}$ in SR-Comp1</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=SRdistribution5">$R_\mathrm{ISR}$ in SR-Comp2</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=SRdistribution6">$R_\mathrm{ISR}$ in SR-Comp3</a> <br/> <a href="155678?version=1&table=SRdistribution1">$R_\mathrm{ISR}$ in SR-Comp-1c</a> <br/> </ul> <b>Acceptances:</b> <ul> SUSY signals: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance2">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance3">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance4">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance5">SR-HM-Disc</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance6">SR-Comp1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance7">SR-Comp2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance8">SR-Comp3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance1">SR-Comp-1c</a> <br/> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{21}$: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance9">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance10">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance11">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance12">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{22}$: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance13">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance14">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance15">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance16">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> $U(1)$ pair (min): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance17">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance18">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance19">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance20">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> $U(1)$ pair (YM): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance21">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance22">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance23">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptance24">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> </ul> <b>Efficiencies:</b> <ul> $U(1)$ pair (min): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency1">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency2">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency3">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency4">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> $U(1)$ pair (YM): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency5">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency6">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency7">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Efficiency8">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> </ul> <b>Acceptance times efficiency:</b> <ul> SUSY signals: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency2">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency3">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency4">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency5">SR-HM-Disc</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency6">SR-Comp1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency7">SR-Comp2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency8">SR-Comp3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency1">SR-Comp-1c</a> <br/> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{21}$: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency9">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency10">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency11">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency12">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> $\mathrm{LQ}^\mathrm{u}_{22}$: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency13">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency14">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency15">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency16">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> $U(1)$ pair (min): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency17">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency18">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency19">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency20">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> $U(1)$ pair (YM): <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency21">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency22">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency23">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Acceptancetimesefficiency24">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> </ul> <b>Cutflow:</b> <ul> SUSY benchmarks: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow5">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow6">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow7">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow8">SR-HM-Disc</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow2">SR-Comp1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow3">SR-Comp2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow4">SR-Comp3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow1">SR-Comp-1c</a> <br/> LQ benchmarks: <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow9">SR-HM1</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow10">SR-HM2</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow11">SR-HM3</a> <a href="155678?version=1&table=Cutflow12">SR-HM-Disc</a> <br/> </ul>
Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.
Expected exclusion limit $(-1\sigma)$ at 95% CL for pair production of top squarks decaying to charm quarks and neutralinos.
A search is conducted for a new scalar boson $S$, with a mass distinct from that of the Higgs boson, decaying into four leptons ($\ell =$$e$, $\mu$) via an intermediate state containing two on-shell, promptly decaying new spin-1 bosons $Z_\text{d}$: $S \rightarrow Z_\text{d}Z_\text{d} \rightarrow 4\ell$, where the $Z_\text{d}$ boson has a mass between 15 and 300 GeV, and the $S$ boson has a mass between either 30 and 115 GeV or 130 and 800 GeV. The search uses proton-proton collision data collected with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider with an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV. No significant excess above the Standard Model background expectation is observed. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are set on the production cross-section times branching ratio, $\sigma(gg \to S) \times \mathcal{B}(S\rightarrow Z_\text{d}Z_\text{d} \rightarrow 4\ell)$, as a function of the mass of both particles, $m_S$ and $m_{Z\text{d}}$.
Average dilepton mass distribution $\left\langle m_{\ell\ell}\right\rangle = \frac{1}{2}\left(m_{ab} + m_{cd}\right)$ in Signal Region 1.
Average dilepton mass distribution $\left\langle m_{\ell\ell}\right\rangle = \frac{1}{2}\left(m_{ab} + m_{cd}\right)$ in Signal Region 2.
Total invariant mass distribution $m_{4\ell}$ in Signal Region 1.
In ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions at the LHC, each nucleus acts a sources of high-energy real photons that can scatter off the opposing nucleus in ultra-peripheral photonuclear ($\gamma+A$) collisions. Hard scattering processes initiated by the photons in such collisions provide a novel method for probing nuclear parton distributions in a kinematic region not easily accessible to other measurements. ATLAS has measured production of dijet and multi-jet final states in ultra-peripheral Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\text{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV using a data set recorded in 2018 with an integrated luminosity of 1.72 $\text{nb}^{-1}$. Photonuclear final states are selected by requiring a rapidity gap in the photon direction; this selects events where one of the outgoing nuclei remains intact. Jets are reconstructed using the anti-$k_\text{t}$ algorithm with radius parameter, $R = 0.4$. Triple-differential cross-sections, unfolded for detector response, are measured and presented using two sets of kinematic variables. The first set consists of the total transverse momentum ($H_\text{T}$),rapidity, and mass of the jet system. The second set uses $H_\text{T}$ and particle-level nuclear and photon parton momentum fractions, $x_\text{A}$ and $z_{\gamma}$, respectively. The results are compared with leading-order (LO) perturbative QCD calculations of photonuclear jet production cross-sections, where all LO predictions using existing fits fall below the data in the shadowing region. More detailed theoretical comparisons will allow these results to strongly constrain nuclear parton distributions, and these data provide results from the LHC directly comparable to early physics results at the planned Electron-Ion Collider.
The fraction of photonuclear jet events passing the fiducial requirements in which the photon-emitting nucleus does not break up as a function of \zg. The systematic uncertainties are not symmetrized, and correlations in uncertainties are neglected for both the total systematic uncertainty and statistical uncertainty.
Fully unfolded triple-differential cross-sections as a function of $H_\text{T}$, $y_\text{jets}$, and $m_\text{jets}$. Systematic uncertainties are decomposed into symmetrized nuisance parameters, where parameters labelled "Corr" are fully correlated bin-to-bin, while parameters labelled "Uncorr" should be treated as un-correlated bin-to-bin. These cross-sections are not corrected for the effects of additional nuclear break-up. Values for the total fiducial cross-section in each bin are reported with full statistical and systematic uncertainties. Fractions of the total bin volume occupied by the fiducial region, fractions of the total cross-section in that bin satisfying fiducial requirements, and mean bin values for each axis variable are derived from Pythia 8 Monte Carlo and reported as well. For more details on these quantities, see Appendix B.
Fully unfolded triple-differential cross-sections as a function of $H_\text{T}$, $x_\text{A}$, and $z_{\gamma}$. Systematic uncertainties are decomposed into symmetrized nuisance parameters, where parameters labelled "Corr" are fully correlated bin-to-bin, while parameters labelled "Uncorr" should be treated as un-correlated bin-to-bin. These cross-sections are not corrected for the effects of additional nuclear break-up. Values for the total fiducial cross-section in each bin are reported with full statistical and systematic uncertainties. Fractions of the total bin volume occupied by the fiducial region, fractions of the total cross-section in that bin satisfying fiducial requirements, and mean bin values for each axis variable are derived from Pythia 8 Monte Carlo and reported as well. For more details on these quantities, see Appendix B.
A search is presented for a heavy scalar ($H$) or pseudo-scalar ($A$) predicted by the two-Higgs-doublet models, where the $H/A$ is produced in association with a top-quark pair ($t\bar{t}H/A$), and with the $H/A$ decaying into a $t\bar{t}$ pair. Events are selected requiring exactly one or two opposite-charge electrons or muons. Data-driven corrections are applied to improve the modelling of the $t\bar{t}$+jets background in the regime with high jet and $b$-jet multiplicities. These include a novel multi-dimensional kinematic reweighting based on a neural network trained using data and simulations. An $H/A$-mass parameterised graph neural network is trained to optimise the signal-to-background discrimination. In combination with the previous search performed by the ATLAS Collaboration in the multilepton final state, the observed upper limits on the $t\bar{t}H/A \rightarrow t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$ production cross-section at 95% confidence level range between 14 fb and 5.0 fb for an $H/A$ with mass between 400 GeV and 1000 GeV, respectively. Assuming that both the $H$ and $A$ contribute to the $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$ cross-section, $\tan\beta$ values below 1.7 or 0.7 are excluded for a mass of 400 GeV or 1000 GeV, respectively. The results are also used to constrain a model predicting the pair production of a colour-octet scalar, with the scalar decaying into a $t\bar{t}$ pair.
Post-fit distribution of the GNN score evaluated with $m_{H/A}$ = 400 GeV in the 1L region with $\geq 10$ jets and four $b$-tagged jets. The fit is performed under the background-only hypothesis.
Post-fit distribution of the GNN score evaluated with $m_{H/A}$ = 400 GeV in the 2LOS region with $\geq8$ jets and $\geq 4$ $𝑏$-tagged jets. The fit is performed under the background-only hypothesis.
Post-fit distribution of the GNN score evaluated with $m_{H/A}$ = 400 GeV in the validation region in the 1L region with $\geq 10$ jets. These regions do not enter the fit. The post-fit background prediction is obtained using the post-fit nuisance parameters from the background-only fit in the control and signal regions.
A combination of searches for the single production of vector-like top quarks ($T$) is presented. These analyses are based on proton$-$proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV recorded in 2015$-$2018 with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. The $T$-quark decay modes considered in this combination are into a top quark and either a Standard Model Higgs boson or a $Z$ boson ($T \to Ht$ and $T \to Zt$). The individual searches used in the combination are differentiated by the number of leptons ($e$, $\mu$) in the final state. The observed data are found to be in good agreement with the Standard Model background prediction. Interpretations are provided for a range of masses and couplings of the vector-like top quark for benchmark models and generalized representations in terms of 95% confidence level limits. For a benchmark signal prediction of a vector-like top quark SU2 singlet with electroweak coupling, $\kappa$, of 0.5, masses below 2.1 TeV are excluded, resulting in the most restrictive limits to date.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representation assuming $\kappa$=0.3. The expected limits for the individual analyses are shown. The $HtZt$ analysis is only included in the limit calculation for $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ < 2.1 TeV.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) singlet representation assuming $\kappa$=0.5. The expected limits for the individual analyses are shown. The $HtZt$ analysis is only included in the limit calculation for $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ < 2.1 TeV.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the total cross-section σ($pp$ → $T$ → $Ht/Zt$) as a function of $T$-quark mass in the SU(2) doublet representation assuming $\kappa$=0.3. The expected limits for the individual analyses are shown. The $HtZt$ analysis is only included in the limit calculation for $m_{\mathrm{T}}$ < 2.1 TeV.
A search for heavy right-handed Majorana neutrinos is performed with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, using the 140 $\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV collected during Run 2. This search targets $t\bar{t}$ production, in which both top quarks decay into a bottom quark and a $W$ boson, where one of the $W$ bosons decays hadronically and the other decays into an electron or muon and a heavy neutral lepton. The heavy neutral lepton is identified through a decay into an electron or muon and another $W$ boson, resulting in a pair of same-charge same-flavor leptons in the final state. This paper presents the first search for heavy neutral leptons in the mass range of 15-75 GeV using $t\bar{t}$ events. No significant excess is observed over the background expectation, and upper limits are placed on the signal cross-sections. Assuming a benchmark scenario of the phenomenological type-I seesaw model, these cross-section limits are then translated into upper limits on the mixing parameters of the heavy Majorana neutrino with Standard Model neutrinos.
Definitions of different signal and control regions. The control regions are enriched in events from the following processes. ttW, heavy-flavor (HF) fake, photon-conversion (PC), and charge-flip (CF). The 'Z veto' is defined as $m_{ee}$ not in [$m_Z$ - 10 GeV, $m_Z$ + 10 GeV].
Post-fit event yields for the different background processes in the signal regions, as obtained from the background-only fit in the high-mass region.
Expected and observed upper limits on the signal cross-sections at 95% CL.
Many extensions of the Standard Model, including those with dark matter particles, propose new mediator particles that decay into hadrons. This paper presents a search for such low mass narrow resonances decaying into hadrons using 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data recorded with the ATLAS detector at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The resonances are searched for in the invariant mass spectrum of large-radius jets with two-pronged substructure that are recoiling against an energetic photon from initial state radiation, which is used as a trigger to circumvent limitations on the maximum data recording rate. This technique enables the search for boosted hadronically decaying resonances in the mass range 20-100 GeV hitherto unprobed by the ATLAS Collaboration. The observed data are found to agree with Standard Model predictions and 95% confidence level upper limits are set on the coupling of a hypothetical new spin-1 $Z'$ resonance with Standard Model quarks as a function of the assumed $Z'$-boson mass in the range between 20 and 200 GeV.
Invariant mass $m_{J}$ of the resonance candidates in the region defined with central photon $\eta_{\gamma} < 1.3$ and a tagged large-$R$ jet after the fit to data under the background-only hypothesis. The total systematic uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Three representative $Z^{`}$ signal distributions are overlaid as red lines. The signal is shown for $g_q=0.2$ with production cross sections of 309 fb, 143 fb, and 34.2 fb for $m_{Z^{`}}=(20,~50,~\text{and}~125~\text{GeV}$), respectively.
Invariant mass $m_{J}$ of the resonance candidates in the region defined with forward photon $\eta_{\gamma} > 1.3$ and a tagged large-$R$ jet after the fit to data under the background-only hypothesis. The total systematic uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Three representative $Z^{`}$ signal distributions are overlaid as red lines. The signal is shown for $g_q=0.2$ with production cross sections of 309 fb, 143 fb, and 34.2 fb for $m_{Z^{`}}=(20,~50,~\text{and}~125~\text{GeV}$), respectively.
Invariant mass $m_{J}$ of the resonance candidates in the region defined with central photon $\eta_{\gamma} < 1.3$ and an anti-tagged large-$R$ jetafter the fit to data under the background-only hypothesis. The total systematic uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Three representative $Z^{`}$ signal distributions are overlaid as red lines. The signal is shown for $g_q=0.2$ with production cross sections of 309 fb, 143 fb, and 34.2 fb for $m_{Z^{`}}=(20,~50,~\text{and}~125~\text{GeV}$), respectively.
Differential measurements of Higgs boson production in the $\tau$-lepton-pair decay channel are presented in the gluon fusion, vector-boson fusion (VBF), $VH$ and $t\bar{t}H$ associated production modes, with particular focus on the VBF production mode. The data used to perform the measurements correspond to 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. Two methods are used to perform the measurements: the Simplified Template Cross-Section (STXS) approach and an Unfolded Fiducial Differential measurement considering only the VBF phase space. For the STXS measurement, events are categorized by their production mode and kinematic properties such as the Higgs boson's transverse momentum ($p^{\text{H}}_\text{T}$), the number of jets produced in association with the Higgs boson, or the invariant mass of the two leading jets ($m_{jj}$). For the VBF production mode, the ratio of the measured cross-section to the Standard Model prediction for $m_{jj}>1.5$ TeV and $p^{\text{H}}_\text{T}>200$ GeV ($p^{\text{H}}_\text{T}<200$ GeV) is ${1.29}^{+0.39}_{-0.34}$ (${0.12}^{+0.34}_{-0.33}$). This is the first VBF measurement for the higher-$p^{\text{H}}_\text{T}$ criteria, and the most precise for the lower-$p^{\text{H}}_\text{T}$ criteria. The fiducial cross-section measurements, which only consider the kinematic properties of the event, are performed as functions of variables characterizing the VBF topology, such as the signed $\Delta\phi_{jj}$ between the two leading jets. The measurements have a precision of 30%-50% and agree well with the Standard Model predictions. These results are interpreted in the SMEFT framework, and place the strongest constraints to date on the CP-odd Wilson coefficient $c_{H\tilde{W}}$.
Distribution of the reconstructed $\tau\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\tau\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_0 signal region for $p_{\text{T}}^{H}<200$ GeV. The observed Higgs boson signal corresponds to $(\sigma\times B)/(\sigma\times B)_{\text{SM}}\,=\,0.99$. Entries with values above the $x$-axis range are shown in the last bin of each distribution. The prediction for each sample is determined from the likelihood fit performed to measure the total $pp\rightarrow H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ cross-section.
Distribution of the reconstructed $\tau\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\tau\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_0 signal region for $p_{\text{T}}^{H}>200$ GeV. The observed Higgs boson signal corresponds to $(\sigma\times B)/(\sigma\times B)_{\text{SM}}\,=\,0.99$. Entries with values above the $x$-axis range are shown in the last bin of each distribution. The prediction for each sample is determined from the likelihood fit performed to measure the total $pp\rightarrow H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ cross-section.
Distribution of the reconstructed $\tau\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\tau\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_1 signal region for $p_{\text{T}}^{H}<200$ GeV. The observed Higgs boson signal corresponds to $(\sigma\times B)/(\sigma\times B)_{\text{SM}}\,=\,0.99$. Entries with values above the $x$-axis range are shown in the last bin of each distribution. The prediction for each sample is determined from the likelihood fit performed to measure the total $pp\rightarrow H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ cross-section.
Forum