Spin transfer $D_{LL}$ for positive and negative $\eta$ versus $p_T$ for JP1 and L2JetHigh triggered data samples, together with results previously published in [Phys.Rev. D80 (2009) 111102 (R)].

Spin transfer $D_{LL}$ for positive and negative $\eta$ versus $p_T$ for JP1 and L2JetHigh triggered data samples, together with results previously published in [Phys.Rev. D80 (2009) 111102 (R)]. Results updated with $\alpha_{\Lambda (\bar{\Lambda})} = 0.732$.

Spin transfer $D_{LL}$ for positive $\eta$ versus $p_T$.

Spin transfer $D_{LL}$ for positive $\eta$ versus $p_T$. Results updated with $\alpha_{\Lambda (\bar{\Lambda})} = 0.732$

'Transverse spin transfer of $\Lambda$ in transversely polarized proton-proton collisions at 200 GeV.'

'Transverse spin transfer of $\bar{\Lambda}$ in transversely polarized proton-proton collisions at 200 GeV.'

'Transverse spin transfer $\Lambda$ in transversely polarized proton-proton collisions at 200 GeV.'

'Transverse spin transfer of $\bar{\Lambda}$ in transversely polarized proton-proton collisions at 200 GeV.'

Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in V0M IV multiplicity class

Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in V0M V multiplicity class

Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in V0M VI multiplicity class

Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in V0M VII multiplicity class

Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in V0M VIII multiplicity class

Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in V0M IX multiplicity class

Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in V0M X multiplicity class

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class I

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class II

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class III

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class IV

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class V

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class VI

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class VII

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class VIII

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class IX

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class X

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class I

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class II

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class III

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class IV

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class V

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class VI

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class VII

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class VIII

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class IX

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class X

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class I

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class II

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class III

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class IV

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class V

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class VI

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class VII

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class VIII

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class IX

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class X

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class I

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class II

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class III

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class IV + V

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class VI

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class VII

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class VIII

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class IX

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class X

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class I

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class II

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class III

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class IV + V

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class VI

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class VII

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class VIII

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class IX

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class X

Unidentified particle spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

$\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$ spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

$K^{+}+K^{-}$ spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

$p+\bar{p}$ spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

$\Lambda + \bar{\Lambda}$ spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

$\Xi^{-} + \bar{\Xi}^{+}$ spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

$K* + \bar{K}*$ spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

$\phi$ spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

Unidentified particle spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

$\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$ spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

$K^{+}+K^{-}$ spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

$p+\bar{p}$ spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

$\Lambda + \bar{\Lambda}$ spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

$\Xi^{-} + \bar{\Xi}^{+}$ spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

$K* + \bar{K}*$ spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

$\phi$ spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/\phi$ yield ratios in low multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $(K^{+} + K^{-})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ yield ratios in low multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ yield ratios in low multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $\Lambda/K^{0}_{s}$ yield ratios in low multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/\phi$ yield ratios in high multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $(K^{+} + K^{-})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ yield ratios in high multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ yield ratios in high multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $\Lambda/K^{0}_{s}$ yield ratios in high multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/\phi$ ratio in low-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(K^{+} + K^{-})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratio in low-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratio in low-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $\Lambda/K^{0}_{s}$ ratio in low-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/\phi$ ratio in mid-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(K^{+} + K^{-})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratio in mid-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratio in mid-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $\Lambda/K^{0}_{s}$ ratio in mid-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/\phi$ ratio in high-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(K^{+} + K^{-})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratio in high-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratio in high-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $\Lambda/K^{0}_{s}$ ratio in high-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Integrated $(K^{+} + K^{-})$/$(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratios as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV.

Integrated $(K^{*} + \bar{K}^{*})$/$(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratios as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV.

Integrated $\phi$/$(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratios as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV.

$\langle\beta_{T}\rangle$ from blast-wave fit to PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.76 TeV

$T_{kin}$ from blast-wave fit to PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.76 TeV

$n$ from blast-wave fit to PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.76 TeV

$\langle\beta_{T}\rangle$ from blast-wave fit to pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 5.02 TeV

$T_{kin}$ from blast-wave fit to pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 5.02 TeV

$n$ from blast-wave fit to pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 5.02 TeV

$\langle\beta_{T}\rangle$ from blast-wave fit to pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV

$T_{kin}$ from blast-wave fit to pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV

$n$ from blast-wave fit to pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV

Fully corrected $p_{\rm T} D$ distributions in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$\,TeV for $R = 0.2$ in the range of jet $p_{\mathrm{T,jet}}^{\rm ch}$ of $40$--$60$\,GeV$/c$. The results are compared to PYTHIA.

Ratio of fully corrected $p_{\rm T} D$ distributions pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$\,TeV for $R = 0.2$ in the range of jet $p_{\mathrm{T,jet}}^{\rm ch}$ of $40$--$60$\,GeV$/c$ and PYTHIA 8 Tune 4C simulations. The systematic uncertainty of $p_{\rm T} D$ is propagated to the ratio.

Ratio of fully corrected $p_{\rm T} D$ distributions in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$\,TeV for $R = 0.2$ in the range of jet $p_{\mathrm{T,jet}}^{\rm ch}$ of $40$--$60$\,GeV$/c$ and PYTHIA Perugia 11 simulations. The systematic uncertainty of $p_{\rm T} D$ is propagated to the ratio.

Fully corrected $LeSub$ distributions in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$\,TeV for $R = 0.2$ in the range of jet $p_{\mathrm{T,jet}}^{\rm ch}$ of $40$--$60$\,GeV$/c$.

Ratio of fully corrected $LeSub$ distributions in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$\,TeV for $R = 0.2$ in the range of jet $p_{\mathrm{T,jet}}^{\rm ch}$ of $40$--$60$\,GeV$/c$ and PYTHIA 8 Tune 4C simulations. The systematic uncertainty of $LeSub$ is propagated to the ratio.

Ratio of fully corrected $LeSub$ distributions in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$\,TeV for $R = 0.2$ in the range of jet $p_{\mathrm{T,jet}}^{\rm ch}$ of $40$--$60$\,GeV$/c$ and PYTHIA Perugia 11 simulations. The systematic uncertainty of $LeSub$ is propagated to the ratio.

Fully corrected $g$ distributions in $0$--$10\%$ central Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$\,TeV for $R = 0.2$ in the range of jet $p_{\mathrm{T,jet}}^{\rm ch}$ of $40$--$60$\,GeV$/c$. The results are compared to PYTHIA.

Ratio of fully corrected $g$ distributions in $0$--$10\%$ central Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$\,TeV for $R = 0.2$ in the range of jet $p_{\mathrm{T,jet}}^{\rm ch}$ of $40$--$60$\,GeV$/c$ and PYTHIA 8 Tune 4C simulations. The systematic uncertainty of $g$ is propagated to the ratio.

Ratio of fully corrected $g$ distributions in $0$--$10\%$ central Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$\,TeV for $R = 0.2$ in the range of jet $p_{\mathrm{T,jet}}^{\rm ch}$ of $40$--$60$\,GeV$/c$ and PYTHIA Perugia 11 simulations. The systematic uncertainty of $g$ is propagated to the ratio.

Fully corrected $p_{\rm T} D$ distributions in $0$--$10\%$ central Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$\,TeV for $R = 0.2$ in the range of jet $p_{\mathrm{T,jet}}^{\rm ch}$ of $40$--$60$\,GeV$/c$. The results are compared to PYTHIA.

Ratio of fully corrected $p_{\rm T} D$ distributions in $0$--$10\%$ central Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$\,TeV for $R = 0.2$ in the range of jet $p_{\mathrm{T,jet}}^{\rm ch}$ of $40$--$60$\,GeV$/c$ and PYTHIA 8 simulations. The systematic uncertainty of $p_{\rm T} D$ is propagated to the ratio.

Ratio of fully corrected $p_{\rm T} D$ distributions in $0$--$10\%$ central Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$\,TeV for $R = 0.2$ in the range of jet $p_{\mathrm{T,jet}}^{\rm ch}$ of $40$--$60$\,GeV$/c$ and PYTHIA Perugia 11 simulations. The systematic uncertainty of $p_{\rm T} D$ is propagated to the ratio.

Fully corrected $LeSub$ distributions in $0$--$10\%$ central Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$\,TeV for $R = 0.2$ in the range of jet $p_{\mathrm{T,jet}}^{\rm ch}$ of $40$--$60$\,GeV$/c$. The results are compared to PYTHIA.

Ratio of fully corrected $LeSub$ distributions in $0$--$10\%$ central Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$\,TeV for $R = 0.2$ in the range of jet $p_{\mathrm{T,jet}}^{\rm ch}$ of $40$--$60$\,GeV$/c$ and PYTHIA 8 simulations. The systematic uncertainty of $LeSub$ is propagated to the ratio.

Ratio of fully corrected $LeSub$ distributions in $0$--$10\%$ central Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$\,TeV for $R = 0.2$ in the range of jet $p_{\mathrm{T,jet}}^{\rm ch}$ of $40$--$60$\,GeV$/c$ and PYTHIA Perugia 11 simulations. The systematic uncertainty of $LeSub$ is propagated to the ratio.

Data-to-cocktail ratio as a function of the invariant-mass. In the hadronic cocktail, random correlations of dielectrons from charm decays are assumed to simulate the effects of the interaction between charm quarks and the medium. The statistical and systematic uncertainties of data are represented by vertical bars and boxes.

Dielectron invariant-mass spectrum measured in central Pb-Pb collisions for the transverse-momentum interval 1.0 < $p_{\rm T,ee}$ < 2.0 GeV/$c. The statistical and systematic uncertainties of the data are represented by vertical bars and boxes.

Dielectron invariant-mass spectrum measured in central Pb--Pb collisions for the transverse-momentum interval 2.0 < $p_{\rm T,ee}$ < 4.0 GeV/$c. The statistical and systematic uncertainties of the data are represented by vertical bars and boxes.

Direct photon ratio $R_{\gamma^{(*)}}=1+\gamma^{(*)}_{\mathrm{dir}}/\gamma^{(*)}_{\mathrm{decay}}$ measured using virtual photons in the centrality range 0$-$10$\%$. The statistical and systematic uncertainties of the data are represented by vertical bars and boxes.

The centrality dependence of e+e− invariant mass spectra within the STAR acceptance from Au+Au collisions and U+U collisions for pair pT < 0.15 GeV/c. The vertical bars on data points depict the statistical uncertainties, while the systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The hadronic cocktail yields from U+U collisions are ∼5%–12% higher than those from Au+Au collisions in given centrality bins; thus only cocktails for Au+Au collisions are shown here as solid lines, with shaded bands representing the systematic uncertainties for clarity.

The centrality dependence of e+e− invariant mass spectra within the STAR acceptance from Au+Au collisions and U+U collisions for pair pT < 0.15 GeV/c. The vertical bars on data points depict the statistical uncertainties, while the systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The hadronic cocktail yields from U+U collisions are ∼5%–12% higher than those from Au+Au collisions in given centrality bins; thus only cocktails for Au+Au collisions are shown here as solid lines, with shaded bands representing the systematic uncertainties for clarity.

The centrality dependence of e+e− invariant mass spectra within the STAR acceptance from Au+Au collisions and U+U collisions for pair pT < 0.15 GeV/c. The vertical bars on data points depict the statistical uncertainties, while the systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The hadronic cocktail yields from U+U collisions are ∼5%–12% higher than those from Au+Au collisions in given centrality bins; thus only cocktails for Au+Au collisions are shown here as solid lines, with shaded bands representing the systematic uncertainties for clarity.

The corresponding ratios of data over cocktail for Figure 1.

The corresponding ratios of data over cocktail for Figure 1.

The corresponding ratios of data over cocktail for Figure 1.

The corresponding ratios of data over cocktail for Figure 1.

The corresponding ratios of data over cocktail for Figure 1.

The corresponding ratios of data over cocktail for Figure 1.

The e+e− pair pT distributions within the STAR acceptance for different mass regions in 60%–80% Au+Au and U+U collisions compared to cocktails. The systematic uncertainties of the data are shown as gray boxes. The gray bands depict the systematic uncertainties of the cocktails.

The e+e− pair pT distributions within the STAR acceptance for different mass regions in 60%–80% Au+Au and U+U collisions compared to cocktails. The systematic uncertainties of the data are shown as gray boxes. The gray bands depict the systematic uncertainties of the cocktails.

The e+e− pair pT distributions within the STAR acceptance for different mass regions in 60%–80% Au+Au and U+U collisions compared to cocktails. The systematic uncertainties of the data are shown as gray boxes. The gray bands depict the systematic uncertainties of the cocktails.

The e+e− pair pT distributions within the STAR acceptance for different mass regions in 60%–80% Au+Au and U+U collisions compared to cocktails. The systematic uncertainties of the data are shown as gray boxes. The gray bands depict the systematic uncertainties of the cocktails.

The e+e− pair pT distributions within the STAR acceptance for different mass regions in 60%–80% Au+Au and U+U collisions compared to cocktails. The systematic uncertainties of the data are shown as gray boxes. The gray bands depict the systematic uncertainties of the cocktails.

The e+e− pair pT distributions within the STAR acceptance for different mass regions in 60%–80% Au+Au and U+U collisions compared to cocktails. The systematic uncertainties of the data are shown as gray boxes. The gray bands depict the systematic uncertainties of the cocktails.

The low-pT (pT < 0.15 GeV/c) e+e− excess mass spectra (data − cocktail) within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% for Au + Au and U + U collisions, compared with a broadened rho meson model calculation [8]. The contributions of rho and phi from the photonuclear process are shown, as are the contributions of photon-photon process from two models [33,34]. The model calculations are for Au + Au collisions in the corresponding centrality bins.

The low-pT (pT < 0.15 GeV/c) e+e− excess mass spectra (data − cocktail) within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% for Au + Au and U + U collisions, compared with a broadened rho meson model calculation [8]. The contributions of rho and phi from the photonuclear process are shown, as are the contributions of photon-photon process from two models [33,34]. The model calculations are for Au + Au collisions in the corresponding centrality bins.

The low-pT (pT < 0.15 GeV/c) e+e− excess mass spectra (data − cocktail) within the STAR acceptance in 40%–60% for Au + Au and U + U collisions, compared with a broadened rho meson model calculation [8]. The contributions of rho and phi from the photonuclear process are shown, as are the contributions of photon-photon process from two models [33,34]. The model calculations are for Au + Au collisions in the corresponding centrality bins.

The low-pT (pT < 0.15 GeV/c) e+e− excess mass spectra (data − cocktail) within the STAR acceptance in 40%–60% for Au + Au and U + U collisions, compared with a broadened rho meson model calculation [8]. The contributions of rho and phi from the photonuclear process are shown, as are the contributions of photon-photon process from two models [33,34]. The model calculations are for Au + Au collisions in the corresponding centrality bins.

The centrality dependence of integrated excess yields in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76, 0.76–1.2, and 1.2–2.6 GeV=c2 in Au + Au and U + U collisions. The centrality dependence of hadronic cocktail yields in the mass region of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in both collisions is also shown for comparison. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes.

The centrality dependence of integrated excess yields in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76, 0.76–1.2, and 1.2–2.6 GeV=c2 in Au + Au and U + U collisions. The centrality dependence of hadronic cocktail yields in the mass region of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in both collisions is also shown for comparison. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes.

The centrality dependence of integrated excess yields in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76, 0.76–1.2, and 1.2–2.6 GeV=c2 in Au + Au and U + U collisions. The centrality dependence of hadronic cocktail yields in the mass region of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in both collisions is also shown for comparison. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes.

The centrality dependence of integrated excess yields in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76, 0.76–1.2, and 1.2–2.6 GeV=c2 in Au + Au and U + U collisions. The centrality dependence of hadronic cocktail yields in the mass region of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in both collisions is also shown for comparison. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes.

The centrality dependence of integrated excess yields in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76, 0.76–1.2, and 1.2–2.6 GeV=c2 in Au + Au and U + U collisions. The centrality dependence of hadronic cocktail yields in the mass region of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in both collisions is also shown for comparison. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes.

The centrality dependence of integrated excess yields in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76, 0.76–1.2, and 1.2–2.6 GeV/c2 in Au + Au and U + U collisions. The centrality dependence of hadronic cocktail yields in the mass region of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in both collisions is also shown for comparison. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes.

The p2T distributions of excess yields within the STAR acceptance in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76 GeV/c2 in 60%–80% Au + Au and U + U collisions. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The solid and dotted lines are exponential fits to the data in Au + Au and U + U collisions, respectively. The dot-dashed and dot-dot- dashed lines represent the p2T distributions for the photon-photon process from two models [33,34] within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% Au + Au collisions. The dashed lines illustrate the corresponding p2T distributions for e+e− pairs from the model [33] traversing 1 fm in a constant magnetic field of 10^14 T perpendicular to the beam line.

The p2T distributions of excess yields within the STAR acceptance in the mass regions of 0.4–0.76 GeV/c2 in 60%–80% Au + Au and U + U collisions. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The solid and dotted lines are exponential fits to the data in Au + Au and U + U collisions, respectively. The dot-dashed and dot-dot- dashed lines represent the p2T distributions for the photon-photon process from two models [33,34] within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% Au + Au collisions. The dashed lines illustrate the corresponding p2T distributions for e+e− pairs from the model [33] traversing 1 fm in a constant magnetic field of 10^14 T perpendicular to the beam line.

The p2T distributions of excess yields within the STAR acceptance in the mass regions of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in 60%–80% Au + Au and U + U collisions. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The solid and dotted lines are exponential fits to the data in Au + Au and U + U collisions, respectively. The dot-dashed and dot-dot- dashed lines represent the p2T distributions for the photon-photon process from two models [33,34] within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% Au + Au collisions. The dashed lines illustrate the corresponding p2T distributions for e+e− pairs from the model [33] traversing 1 fm in a constant magnetic field of 10^14 T perpendicular to the beam line.

The p2T distributions of excess yields within the STAR acceptance in the mass regions of 0.76–1.2 GeV/c2 in 60%–80% Au + Au and U + U collisions. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The solid and dotted lines are exponential fits to the data in Au + Au and U + U collisions, respectively. The dot-dashed and dot-dot- dashed lines represent the p2T distributions for the photon-photon process from two models [33,34] within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% Au + Au collisions. The dashed lines illustrate the corresponding p2T distributions for e+e− pairs from the model [33] traversing 1 fm in a constant magnetic field of 10^14 T perpendicular to the beam line.

The p2T distributions of excess yields within the STAR acceptance in the mass regions of 1.2–2.6 GeV/c2 in 60%–80% Au + Au and U + U collisions. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The solid and dotted lines are exponential fits to the data in Au + Au and U + U collisions, respectively. The dot-dashed and dot-dot- dashed lines represent the p2T distributions for the photon-photon process from two models [33,34] within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% Au + Au collisions. The dashed lines illustrate the corresponding p2T distributions for e+e− pairs from the model [33] traversing 1 fm in a constant magnetic field of 10^14 T perpendicular to the beam line.

The p2T distributions of excess yields within the STAR acceptance in the mass regions of 1.2–2.6 GeV/c2 in 60%–80% Au + Au and U + U collisions. The systematic uncertainties are shown as gray boxes. The solid and dotted lines are exponential fits to the data in Au + Au and U + U collisions, respectively. The dot-dashed and dot-dot- dashed lines represent the p2T distributions for the photon-photon process from two models [33,34] within the STAR acceptance in 60%–80% Au + Au collisions. The dashed lines illustrate the corresponding p2T distributions for e+e− pairs from the model [33] traversing 1 fm in a constant magnetic field of 10^14 T perpendicular to the beam line.

The corresponding sqrt(p2T) of excess yields. The vertical bars on data points are the combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.

The corresponding sqrt(p2T) of excess yields. The vertical bars on data points are the combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.

The radius $r_0$ as a function of m$_T$ obtained with the p$-$p $\oplus$ $\overline{\mathrm{p}}-\overline{\mathrm{p}}$ and the p$-\Lambda$ $\oplus$ $\overline{\mathrm{p}}-\overline{\Lambda}$ correlation functions.

Data/simulation comparisons of the relative jet yields as functions of jet transverse momentum for the endcap

Data/simulation comparisons of the jet yields vs jet neutral energy fraction (NEF), shown separately for jets in different pseudorapidity ranges. The points represent the data (solid circle for barrel, open square and open cross for endcap jets at two different pseudorapidity ranges), and the histogram is the simulation.

Data/simulation comparisons of dijet yields as a function of invariant mass (left) for all the accepted events.

Data/simulation comparisons of dijet yields as a function of the pseudorapidity gap between the jets.

Data/simulation comparisons of dijet yields as a function of azimuthal opening angle between the jets.

Data/simulation comparisons of the underlying event $\delta M$ vs underlying event corrected dijet invariant mass.

The dijet $p_{T}$ imbalance distribution.

The jet invariant mass distribution.

The distributions of the parton $x_1$ and $x_2$, which has been weighted by the partonic $\hat{a}_{LL}$, from PYTHIA detector level simulations at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV for different jet pseudorapidity ranges.

The distributions of the parton $x_1$ and $x_2$, which has been weighted by the partonic $\hat{a}_{LL}$, from PYTHIA detector level simulations at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV for different jet pseudorapidity ranges.

The distributions of the parton $x_1$ and $x_2$, which has been weighted by the partonic $\hat{a}_{LL}$, from PYTHIA detector level simulations at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV for different jet pseudorapidity ranges.

$A_{LL}$ as a function of parton-level invariant mass for dijets with the East barrel-endcap.

$A_{LL}$ as a function of parton-level invariant mass for dijets with the West barrel-endcap.

$A_{LL}$ as a function of parton-level invariant mass for dijets with the endcap-endcap.