The expected upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 4\gamma$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$. Additionally, the expected limits are not provided for a small number of points, indicated with a hyphen, because of a technical failure with the computation.

The observed upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 6\pi^0$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow 3\pi^0)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$.

The expected upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 6\pi^0$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow 3\pi^0)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$. Additionally, the expected limits are not provided for a small number of points, indicated with a hyphen, because of a technical failure with the computation.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the visible cross section as a function of $m_X$ and the fraction of events in the low-$\Delta E$ category.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Selection efficiency for photons originating from the BSM process $X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, where the $X$ particle is a high-mass narrow-width scalar particle originating from the gluon--gluon fusion process.

Fraction of photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for photons originating from the BSM process $X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, where the $X$ particle is a high-mass narrow-width scalar particle originating from the gluon--gluon fusion process.

Normalized differential cross section, $(1/\sigma_\text{fid})d\sigma_\text{fid}/d\log(m_{bb}/p_\text{T})$, as a function of $\log(m_{bb}/p_\text{T})$ for $m_{bb}$ the invariant mass of the two b-jets.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=5$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=5$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=5$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=15$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=15$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=15$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=40$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=40$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=40$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=250$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=500$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=500$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=500$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=800$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=800$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=800$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1200$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1200$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1200$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1500$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1500$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1500$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=2000$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=2000$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=2000$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV and $m_{s}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV and $m_{s}=150$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV and $m_{s}=150$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV and $m_{s}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

The minus $1\sigma$ variation of observed exclusion contour obtained by varying the signal cross section within its uncertainty. The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ vs. $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}$.

The plus $1\sigma$ variation of observed exclusion contour obtained by varying the signal cross section within its uncertainty. The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ vs. $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}$.

The minus $1\sigma$ variation of expected exclusion contour obtained by varying MC statistical uncertainties, detector-related systematic uncertainties, and theoretical uncertainties (excluding signal cross section uncertainties). The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ vs. $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}$.

The plus $1\sigma$ variation of expected exclusion contour obtained by varying MC statistical uncertainties, detector-related systematic uncertainties, and theoretical uncertainties (excluding signal cross section uncertainties). The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ vs. $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}$.

The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}$ vs. $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau)$. Points that are within the contours are excluded.

The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}$ vs. $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau)$. Points that are within the contours are excluded.

The minus $1\sigma$ variation of observed exclusion contour obtained by varying the signal cross section within its uncertainty. The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}$ vs. $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau)$

The plus $1\sigma$ variation of observed exclusion contour obtained by varying the signal cross section within its uncertainty. The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}$ vs. $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau)$

The plus $1\sigma$ variation of expected exclusion contour obtained by varying MC statistical uncertainties, detector-related systematic uncertainties, and theoretical uncertainties (excluding signal cross section uncertainties). The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}$ vs. $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau)$

The minus $1\sigma$ variation of expected exclusion contour obtained by varying MC statistical uncertainties, detector-related systematic uncertainties, and theoretical uncertainties (excluding signal cross section uncertainties). The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}$ vs. $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau)$

Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1})$ signal grid. The column titled 'Leading Region' stores information on which of the fit regions (SRA-B, SRC or SRD) is the dominant based on the expected CLs values.

Expected model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1})$ signal grid. The column titled 'Leading Region' stores information on which of the fit regions (SRA-B, SRC or SRD) is the dominant based on the expected CLs values.

Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $LQ_{3}^{u}$ signal grid with $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau))=0$ %. Only the SRA-B fit region is considered in this interpretation.

Expected model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $LQ_{3}^{u}$ signal grid with $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau))=0$ %. Only the SRA-B fit region is considered in this interpretation.

The distributions of $S$ in SRA-TW. For each bin yields for the data, total SM prediction and a representative signal point are provided. The SM prediction is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties, labeled 'stat', and the remaining uncertainties, labeled 'syst' that include detector-related systematic uncertainties and theoretical uncertainties. The signal predictions is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties only. The rightmost bin includes overflow events.

The distributions of $\it{m}^{\mathrm{R=1.2}}_{1}$ in SRB-TT. For each bin yields for the data, total SM prediction and a representative signal point are provided. The SM prediction is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties, labeled 'stat', and the remaining uncertainties, labeled 'syst' that include detector-related systematic uncertainties and theoretical uncertainties. The signal predictions is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties only. The rightmost bin includes overflow events.

The distributions of R$_{ISR}$ in SRC signal regions before R$_{ISR}$ cuts are applied. For each bin yields for the data, total SM prediction and a representative signal point are provided. The SM prediction is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties, labeled 'stat', and the remaining uncertainties, labeled 'syst' that include detector-related systematic uncertainties and theoretical uncertainties. The signal predictions is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties only. The rightmost bin includes overflow events.

The distributions of $E^{miss}_{T}/\sqrt{H_{T}}$ in SRD0. For each bin yields for the data, total SM prediction and a representative signal point are provided. The SM prediction is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties, labeled 'stat', and the remaining uncertainties, labeled 'syst' that include detector-related systematic uncertainties and theoretical uncertainties. The signal predictions is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties only. The rightmost bin includes overflow events.

The distributions of $E^{miss}_{T}/\sqrt{H_{T}}$ in SRD1. For each bin yields for the data, total SM prediction and a representative signal point are provided. The SM prediction is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties, labeled 'stat', and the remaining uncertainties, labeled 'syst' that include detector-related systematic uncertainties and theoretical uncertainties. The signal predictions is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties only. The rightmost bin includes overflow events.

The distributions of $E^{miss}_{T}/\sqrt{H_{T}}$ in SRD2. For each bin yields for the data, total SM prediction and a representative signal point are provided. The SM prediction is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties, labeled 'stat', and the remaining uncertainties, labeled 'syst' that include detector-related systematic uncertainties and theoretical uncertainties. The signal predictions is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties only. The rightmost bin includes overflow events.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (1300,1)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in SRA-TT. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 30000 raw MC events were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (1300,1)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in SRA-TW. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 30000 raw MC events were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (1300,1)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in SRA-T0. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 30000 raw MC events were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (700,400)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in signal regions SRB-TT, SRB-TW and SRB-T0. The regions differ by the last cut applied. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 60000 raw MC events were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (500,327)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in regions SRC-1, SRC-2, SRC-3, SRC-4 and SRC-5. The regions differ by the last cut applied. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 150000 raw MC events with filter efficiency of 0.384 were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (550,500)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in SRD0. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 90000 raw MC events with filter efficiency of 0.428 were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (550,500)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in SRD1. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 90000 raw MC events with filter efficiency of 0.428 were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (550,500)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in SRD2. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 90000 raw MC events with filter efficiency of 0.428 were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Signal acceptance in SRA-TT for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{3}$

Signal efficiency in SRA-TT for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance in SRA-TW for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{3}$

Signal efficiency in SRA-TW for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance in SRA-T0 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{3}$

Signal efficiency in SRA-T0 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance in SRB-TT for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{3}$

Signal efficiency in SRB-TT for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance in SRB-TW for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{3}$

Signal efficiency in SRB-TW for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance in SRB-T0 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{3}$

Signal efficiency in SRB-T0 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance in SRC1 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRC1 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal acceptance in SRC2 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRC2 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal acceptance in SRC3 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRC3 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal acceptance in SRC4 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRC4 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ plane showed in the paper plot.

Signal acceptance in SRC5 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ plane showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRC5 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal acceptance in SRD0 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRD0 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal acceptance in SRD1 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRD1 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal acceptance in SRD2 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRD2 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Distributions of $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ after the background-only fit. The backgrounds which contribute only a small amount (diboson, W+jets and ttbar+W/Z/h) are grouped and labelled as `Other'.

Distributions of Object-based $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}} {Sig.}$ after the background-only fit. The backgrounds which contribute only a small amount (diboson, W+jets and ttbar+W/Z/h) are grouped and labelled as `Other'.

Distributions of Object-based $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}} {Sig.}$ after the background-only fit. The backgrounds which contribute only a small amount (diboson, W+jets and ttbar+W/Z/h) are grouped and labelled as `Other'.

Distributions of MaxMin alternative algorithm $m(h_{\mathrm{cand1}},h_{\mathrm{cand2}})_{\mathrm{avg}}$ after the background-only fit. The backgrounds which contribute only a small amount (diboson, W+jets and ttbar+W/Z/h) are grouped and labelled as `Other'.

Distributions of MaxMin alternative algorithm $m(h_{\mathrm{cand1}},h_{\mathrm{cand2}})_{\mathrm{avg}}$ after the background-only fit. The backgrounds which contribute only a small amount (diboson, W+jets and ttbar+W/Z/h) are grouped and labelled as `Other'.

Distributions of Leading jet $p_T$ after the background-only fit. The backgrounds which contribute only a small amount (diboson, W+jets and ttbar+W/Z/h) are grouped and labelled as `Other'.

Distributions of Leading jet $p_T$ after the background-only fit. The backgrounds which contribute only a small amount (diboson, W+jets and ttbar+W/Z/h) are grouped and labelled as `Other'.

Distributions of MaxMin algorithm $m_{hcand}$ after the background-only fit. The backgrounds which contribute only a small amount (diboson, W+jets and ttbar+W/Z/h) are grouped and labelled as `Other'.

Distributions of MaxMin algorithm $m_{hcand}$ after the background-only fit. The backgrounds which contribute only a small amount (diboson, W+jets and ttbar+W/Z/h) are grouped and labelled as `Other'.

Signal efficiency in SRA_M_m60 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRA_M_m60 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal acceptance in SRC_28 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRC_28 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRC_26 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRC_26 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRC_24 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRC_24 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_M_dm130 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_M_dm130 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRB for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRB for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_L_dm130 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_L_dm130 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRC_incl for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRC_incl for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_L_m60 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_L_m60 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_incl_dm130 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_incl_dm130 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_incl_m60 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_incl_m60 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal efficiency in SRA_H_m60 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRA_H_m60 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRA_L_dm130 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRA_L_dm130 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRB for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRB for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal acceptance in SRC_22 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRC_22 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal efficiency in SRA_H_dm130 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRA_H_dm130 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRC_24 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRC_24 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRC_26 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRC_26 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal acceptance in SRA_H_m60 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_H_m60 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal efficiency in SRA_incl_m60 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRA_incl_m60 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRC_22 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRC_22 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal acceptance in SRA_M_m60 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_M_m60 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal efficiency in SRC_28 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRC_28 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal acceptance in SRA_H_dm130 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_H_dm130 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal efficiency in SRA_incl_dm130 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRA_incl_dm130 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRA_L_m60 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRA_L_m60 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRA_M_dm130 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRA_M_dm130 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRC_incl for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRC_incl for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Observed 95% CLs exclusion limit for the $\Delta M(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0},\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=130GeV signal grid for the best combined signal regions.

Observed 95% CLs exclusion limit for the $\Delta M(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0},\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=130GeV signal grid for the best combined signal regions.

Expected 95% CLs exclusion limit for the $\Delta M(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0},\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=130GeV signal grid for the best combined signal regions.

Expected 95% CLs exclusion limit for the $\Delta M(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0},\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=130GeV signal grid for the best combined signal regions.

Observed 95% CLs exclusion limit for the $M(\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=60GeV signal grid for the best combined signal regions.

Observed 95% CLs exclusion limit for the $M(\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=60GeV signal grid for the best combined signal regions.

Expected 95% CLs exclusion limit for the $\Delta M(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0},\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=130GeV signal grid for the best combined signal regions.

Expected 95% CLs exclusion limit for the $M(\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=60GeV signal grid for the best combined signal regions.

Model dependent upper limit on the best combined signal regions considered in the $\Delta M(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0},\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=130GeV signal grid

Model dependent upper limit on the best combined signal regions considered in the $\Delta M(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0},\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=130GeV signal grid

Model dependet upper limits on the best combined signal regions considered in the $\Delta M(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0},\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=130GeV signal grid

Model dependet upper limits on the best combined signal regions considered in the $\Delta M(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0},\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=130GeV signal grid

Result of background only fit applied to signal regions. Event yields from the signal regions compared with SM MC predictions for the 3 highest contributing backgrounds separately and combined minor backgrounds.

Result of background only fit applied to signal regions. Event yields from the signal regions compared with SM MC predictions for the 3 highest contributing backgrounds separately and combined minor backgrounds.

Expected background event yields and dominant systematic uncertainties on background estimates in the A-type (inclusive), B-type and C-type (inclusive) regions.

Expected background event yields and dominant systematic uncertainties on background estimates in the A-type (inclusive), B-type and C-type (inclusive) regions.

Background-only fit results for the A- and B-type regions performed using 139$fb^{-1}$ of data. The quoted uncertainties on the fitted SM background include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Background-only fit results for the A- and B-type regions performed using 139$fb^{-1}$ of data. The quoted uncertainties on the fitted SM background include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Background-only fit results for the C-type region performed using 139$fb^{-1}$ of data. The quoted uncertainties on the fitted SM background include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Background-only fit results for the C-type region performed using 139$fb^{-1}$ of data. The quoted uncertainties on the fitted SM background include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the visible cross sections σvis, the observed (S95obs) and expected (S95exp) 95% CL upper limits on the number of signal events with ± 1 σ excursions of the expectation, the CL of the background-only hypothesis, CLB, the discovery p-value (p0), truncated at 0.5, and the associated significance.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the visible cross sections σvis, the observed (S95obs) and expected (S95exp) 95% CL upper limits on the number of signal events with ± 1 σ excursions of the expectation, the CL of the background-only hypothesis, CLB, the discovery p-value (p0), truncated at 0.5, and the associated significance.

Cutflow of the MC events scaled to 139 $fb^{-1}$ for the SRA selections, with a scalar bottom signal of m$(\widetilde{b}_{1},\widetilde{\chi}_2^0,\widetilde{\chi}_1^0) = (1100, 330, 200)$ GeV, considered.

Cutflow of the MC events scaled to 139 $fb^{-1}$ for the SRA selections, with a scalar bottom signal of m$(\widetilde{b}_{1},\widetilde{\chi}_2^0,\widetilde{\chi}_1^0) = (1100, 330, 200)$ GeV, considered.

Cutflow of the MC events scaled to 139 $fb^{-1}$ for the SRB selections, with a scalar bottom signal of m$(\widetilde{b}_{1},\widetilde{\chi}_2^0,\widetilde{\chi}_1^0) = (700, 680, 550)$ GeV, considered.

Cutflow of the MC events scaled to 139 $fb^{-1}$ for the SRB selections, with a scalar bottom signal of m$(\widetilde{b}_{1},\widetilde{\chi}_2^0,\widetilde{\chi}_1^0) = (700, 680, 550)$ GeV, considered.

Cutflow of the MC events scaled to 139 $fb^{-1}$ for the SRC selections, with a scalar bottom signal of m$(\widetilde{b}_{1},\widetilde{\chi}_2^0,\widetilde{\chi}_1^0) = (1200, 1150, 60)$ GeV, considered.

Cutflow of the MC events scaled to 139 $fb^{-1}$ for the SRC selections, with a scalar bottom signal of m$(\widetilde{b}_{1},\widetilde{\chi}_2^0,\widetilde{\chi}_1^0) = (1200, 1150, 60)$ GeV, considered.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 0.33 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 0.67.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 0.67 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 1.00.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 1.00 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 1.33.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 1.33 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 1.67.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 1.67 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 2.00.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 2.00 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 2.33.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 2.33 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 2.67.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 2.67 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 3.00.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 3.00 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 3.33.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 3.33 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 3.67.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 3.67 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 4.00.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single vertical slice of the Lund jet plane between 4.00 < ln(R/#DeltaR) < 4.33.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 0.69 < ln(1/z) < 0.97.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 0.97 < ln(1/z) < 1.25.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 1.25 < ln(1/z) < 1.52.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 1.52 < ln(1/z) < 1.80.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 1.80 < ln(1/z) < 2.08.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 2.08 < ln(1/z) < 2.36.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 2.36 < ln(1/z) < 2.63.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 2.63 < ln(1/z) < 2.91.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 2.91 < ln(1/z) < 3.19.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 3.19 < ln(1/z) < 3.47.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 3.47 < ln(1/z) < 3.74.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 3.74 < ln(1/z) < 4.02.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 4.02 < ln(1/z) < 4.30.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 4.30 < ln(1/z) < 4.57.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 4.57 < ln(1/z) < 4.85.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 4.85 < ln(1/z) < 5.13.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 5.13 < ln(1/z) < 5.41.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 5.41 < ln(1/z) < 5.68.

Normalized differential cross-section of the Lund jet plane. The first systematic uncertainty is detector systematics, the second is background systematic uncertainties. The data is presented as a 1D distribution, for a single horizontal slice of the Lund jet plane between 5.68 < ln(1/z) < 5.96.

The summed covariance matrix of all systematic and statistical uncertainties associated with the measurement in bins of $\ln{(1/z)} \times \ln{(R/\Delta R)}$.

The summed covariance matrix of all statistical uncertainties associated with the measurement in bins of $\ln{(1/z)} \times \ln{(R/\Delta R)}$.

Post-fit yields for data and prediction in each of the single-bin signal regions of the analysis.

Observed 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid.

Observed 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid with the signal cross section increased by one sigma.

Observed 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid with the signal cross section decreased by one sigma.

Expected 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid.

Expected 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid plus one sigma from experimental systematics.

Expected 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid minus one sigma from experimental systematics.

Observed 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid.

Observed 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid with the signal cross section increased by one sigma.

Observed 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid with the signal cross section decreased by one sigma.

Expected 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid.

Expected 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid plus one sigma from experimental systematics.

Expected 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid minus one sigma from experimental systematics.

Observed 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid.

Observed 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid with the signal cross section increased by one sigma.

Observed 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid with the signal cross section decreased by one sigma.

Expected 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid.

Expected 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid plus one sigma from experimental systematics.

Expected 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid minus one sigma from experimental systematics.

Observed 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid.

Expected 95% confidence level limit for the two-step signal grid.

Observed 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid.

Expected 95% confidence level limit for the Gtt signal grid.

Observed 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid.

Expected 95% confidence level limit for the RPV signal grid.

$\mathcal{S}(E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})$ distribution in the signal region SR-10ij50-0ib-MJ340. Two benchmark signal models are shown along with the background yields. These models, each representing a single mass point, are labelled 'RPV' with $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{t}}) = (1600, 600) \, \mathrm{GeV}$ and 'two-step' with $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.

$\mathcal{S}(E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})$ distribution in the signal region SR-12ij50-2ib. Two benchmark signal models are shown along with the background yields. These models, each representing a single mass point, are labelled 'RPV' with $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{t}}) = (1600, 600) \, \mathrm{GeV}$ and 'two-step' with $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.

$\mathcal{S}(E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})$ distribution in the signal region SR-9ij80-0ib. Two benchmark signal models are shown along with the background yields. These models, each representing a single mass point, are labelled 'RPV' with $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{t}}) = (1600, 600) \, \mathrm{GeV}$ and 'two-step' with $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.

Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-8ij50-0ib-MJ500. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.

Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-9ij50-0ib-MJ340. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.

Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-10ij50-0ib-MJ340. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.

Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-10ij50-0ib-MJ500. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.

Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-10ij50-1ib-MJ500. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.

Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-11ij50-0ib. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.

Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-12ij50-2ib. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.

Number of signal events expected for $139 \, \mathrm{fb}^{-1} $ after different analysis selections in the signal region SR-9ij80-0ib. This 'two-step' model requires that a strongly produced gluino decays into quarks, the W and Z bosons, and the lightest stable neutralino where $(m_{\tilde{g}}, m_{\tilde{\chi^{0}_{1}}}) = (1600, 100) \, \mathrm{GeV}$.

Acceptance for the signal region SR-8ij50-0ib-MJ500 showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.

Efficiency for the signal region SR-8ij50-0ib-MJ500 showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.

Acceptance for the signal region SR-9ij50-0ib-MJ340 showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.

Efficiency for the signal region SR-9ij50-0ib-MJ340 showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.

Acceptance for the signal region SR-10ij50-0ib-MJ340 showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.

Efficiency for the signal region SR-10ij50-0ib-MJ340 showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.

Acceptance for the signal region SR-10ij50-0ib-MJ500 showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.

Efficiency for the signal region SR-10ij50-0ib-MJ500 showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.

Acceptance for the signal region SR-10ij50-1ib-MJ500 showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.

Efficiency for the signal region SR-10ij50-1ib-MJ500 showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.

Acceptance for the signal region SR-11ij50-0ib showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.

Efficiency for the signal region SR-11ij50-0ib showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.

Acceptance for the signal region SR-12ij50-2ib showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.

Efficiency for the signal region SR-12ij50-2ib showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.

Acceptance for the signal region SR-9ij80-0ib showing the acceptance for the complete two-step signal grid.

Efficiency for the signal region SR-9ij80-0ib showing the efficiency for the complete two-step signal grid.

The normalisation factors for the dominant backgrounds of the analysis in each of the multi-bin and single-bin regions.

Post-fit yields for data and prediction in each of the single-bin validation regions to test the $N_{\mathrm{jet}}$ extraction.

Post-fit yields for data and prediction in each of the single-bin validation regions to test the $\mathcal{S}(E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})$ extrapolation.

Post-fit yields for data and prediction in each of the multi-bin validation regions to test the $N_{\mathrm{jet}}$ extraction.

Post-fit yields for data and prediction in each of the multi-bin validation regions to test the $\mathcal{S}(E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})$ extrapolation.

The observed Cls from the best expected signal regions for the two-step decay.

The observed Cls from the best expected signal regions for the Gtt decay.

The observed Cls from the best expected signal regions for the RPV decay.

Number of events in each signal region broken down by background type and the number of observed data events.

From left to right; the $95\%$ CL upper limits on the visible cross section (${\langle \epsilon\sigma \rangle}^{95}_{obs}$) and on the number of signal events. Next is the $95\%$ CL upper limit on the number of signal events, given the expected number of background events. The last two columns show the confidence level for the background only hypothesis ($CL_{b}$) and the dicovery $p$-value along with the Gaussian significance (Z).

Visualisation of the highest jet multiplicity event selected in signal regions targeting long cascade decays of pair-produced gluinos. This event was recorded by ATLAS on 23 October 2016, and contains 16 jets, illustrated by cones. Yellow blocks represent the calorimeter energy measured in noise-suppressed clusters. Of the reconstructed jets, 13 (11) have transverse momenta above 50 GeV (80 GeV), with 3 (2) being b-tagged. The leading jet has a transverse momentum of 507 GeV, and the sum of jet transverse momenta $H_T=2.9$ TeV. A value of 343 GeV is observed for the $E_{T}^{miss}$, whose direction is shown by the dashed red line, producing a significance $S(E_{T}^{miss})=6.4$. The sum of the masses of large-radius jets is evaluated as $M_{J}^{\Sigma}=1070$ GeV.

Visualisation of the highest jet multiplicity event selected in a control region used to make predictions of the background from multijet production. This event was recorded by ATLAS on 18 July 2018, and contains 19 jets, illustrated by cones. Yellow blocks represent the calorimeter energy measured in in noise-suppressed clusters. Of the reconstructed jets, 16 (10) have transverse momenta above 50 GeV (80 GeV). No jets were b-tagged. The leading et has a transverse momentum of 371 GeV, and the sum of jet transverse momenta $H_T=2.2$ TeV. A value of 8 GeV is observed for the $E_{T}^{miss}$, whose direction is shown by the dashed red line, producing a significance $S(E_{T}^{miss})=0.2$. The sum of the masses of large-radius jets is evaluated as $M_{J}^{\Sigma}=767$ GeV.

transmax region : Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

away region : Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 09b, mean nTracks toward, toward region: Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

transverse region: Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

Figure 09a, mean nTracks transmin, transmin region: Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

transmax region: Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

away region: Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

Figure 10b, mean meanPt toward, toward region : Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transverse region : Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 10a, mean meanPt transmin, transmin region : Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transmax region : Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

away region : Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 04c from auxiliary figures, mean sumPt toward low thrust, toward region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transverse region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 11c, mean sumPt transmin low thrust, transmin region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transmax region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

away region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 04a from auxiliary figures, mean nTracks toward low thrust, toward region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

transverse region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

Figure 11a, mean nTracks transmin low thrust, transmin region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

transmax region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

away region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

Figure 06a from auxiliary figures, mean meanPt toward low thrust, toward region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transverse region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 12a, mean meanPt transmin low thrust, transmin region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transmax region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

away region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 04d from auxiliary figures, mean sumPt toward high thrust, toward region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transverse region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 11d, mean sumPt transmin high thrust, transmin region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transmax region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

away region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 04b from auxiliary figures, mean nTracks toward high thrust, toward region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

transverse region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

Figure 11b, mean nTracks transmin high thrust, transmin region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

transmax region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

away region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

Figure 06b from auxiliary figures, mean meanPt toward high thrust, toward region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transverse region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 12b, mean meanPt transmin high thrust, transmin region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transmax region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

away region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 01a from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 02a from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 04a, ptSpec transmin_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 05a, ptSpec transmin_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 01b from auxiliary figures, nTracks toward_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 02b from auxiliary figures, nTracks toward_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 04b, nTracks transmin_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 05b, nTracks transmin_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 01c from auxiliary figures, sumPt toward_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 02c from auxiliary figures, sumPt toward_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 04c, sumPt transmin_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 05c, sumPt transmin_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 01d from auxiliary figures, meanPt toward_zptregion2, $\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 02d from auxiliary figures, meanPt toward_zptregion7, $\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 04d, meanPt transmin_zptregion2, $\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 05d, meanPt transmin_zptregion7, $\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 03a from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion2 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 03c from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion7 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 06a, ptSpec transmin_zptregion2 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 06c, ptSpec transmin_zptregion7 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 05a from auxiliary figures, nTracks toward_zptregion2 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 07a, nTracks transmin_zptregion2 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 03b from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion2 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 03d from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion7 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 06b, ptSpec transmin_zptregion2 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 06d, ptSpec transmin_zptregion7 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 05b from auxiliary figures, nTracks toward_zptregion2 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 07b, nTracks transmin_zptregion2 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

D(pT,r)_PbPb The charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV for different centrality, track pT and jet pT ranges.

D(pT,r)_PbPb The charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV for different centrality, track pT and jet pT ranges.

D(pT,r)_PbPb The charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV for different centrality, track pT and jet pT ranges.

D(pT,r)_PbPb The charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV for different centrality, track pT and jet pT ranges.

D(pT,r)_PbPb The charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV for different centrality, track pT and jet pT ranges.

D(pT,r)_PbPb The charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV for different centrality, track pT and jet pT ranges.

D(pT,r)_PbPb The charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV for different centrality, track pT and jet pT ranges.

D(pT,r)_PbPb The charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV for different centrality, track pT and jet pT ranges.

D(pT,r)_PbPb The charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV for different centrality, track pT and jet pT ranges.

D(pT,r)_PbPb The charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV for different centrality, track pT and jet pT ranges.

D(pT,r)_pp The charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.

R_D(pT,r) The ratios of charged particle distributions around jets as a function of distance from the jet axis in different centrality intervals of PbPb and pp collisions at 5.02 TeV for different track pT and jet pT ranges.