Showing 10 of 820 results
The first measurement at midrapidity ($|y| < 0.5$) of the production yield of the strange-charm baryons $Ξ_c^+$ and $Ξ_c^0$ as a function of charged-particle multiplicity in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV with the ALICE experiment at the LHC is reported. The $Ξ_c^+$ baryon is reconstructed via the $Ξ_c^+ \rightarrow Ξ^-π^+π^+$ decay channel in the range $4 < p_{\rm T} < 12$ GeV/$c$, while the $Ξ_c^0$ baryon is reconstructed via both the $Ξ_c^0 \rightarrow Ξ^-π^+$ and $Ξ_c^0 \rightarrow Ξ^-e^+ν_e$ decay channels in the range $2 < p_{\rm T} < 12$ GeV/$c$. The baryon-to-meson ($Ξ_c^{0,+}/D^0$) and the baryon-to-baryon ($Ξ_c^{0,+}/Λ_c^+$) production yield ratios show no significant dependence on multiplicity. In addition, the observed yield ratios are not described by theoretical predictions that model charm-quark fragmentation based on measurements at $e^+e^-$ and $e^-$p colliders, indicating differences in the charm-baryon production mechanism in pp collisions. A comparison with different event generators and tunings, including different modelling of the hadronisation process, is also discussed. Moreover, the branching-fraction ratio of BR($Ξ_c^0 \rightarrow Ξ^-e^+ν_e$)/BR($Ξ_c^0 \rightarrow Ξ^-π^+$) is measured as 0.825 $\pm$ 0.094 (stat.) $\pm$ 0.081 (syst.). This value supersedes the previous ALICE measurement, improving the statistical precision by a factor of 1.6.
$p_{\rm T}$-differential per-event yield of prompt $\Xi_c^0$ baryons measured in the different multiplicity classes.
$p_{\rm T}$-differential per-event yield of prompt $\Xi_c^+$ baryons measured in the different multiplicity classes.
Ratio between the prompt $\Xi_c^0$ baryons in a multiplicity class to the multiplicity-integrated (INEL $>$ 0) class.
Ratio between the prompt $\Xi_c^+$ baryons in a multiplicity class to the multiplicity-integrated (INEL $>$ 0) class.
The prompt production yield ratios between $\Xi_c^0$ and $\rm {D}^0$ measured in the same multiplicity classes.
The prompt production yield ratios between $\Xi_c^+$ and $\rm {D}^0$ measured in the same multiplicity classes.
The prompt production yield ratios between $\Xi_c^0$ and $\Lambda_c^+$ measured in the same multiplicity classes.
The prompt production yield ratios between $\Xi_c^+$ and $\Lambda_c^+$ measured in the same multiplicity classes.
The branching-fraction ratio of BR($\Xi_c^0 \rightarrow \Xi^-e^+\nu_e$)/BR($\Xi_c^0 \rightarrow \Xi^-\pi^+$)
A search for flavor violating decays of the Z boson to charged leptons is performed using data from proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV collected with the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. Each of the decays Z $\to$ e$μ$, Z $\to$ e$τ$, and Z $\to$$μτ$ is considered. The data are consistent with the backgrounds expected from standard model processes. For the Z $\to$ e$μ$ channel the observed (expected) 95% confidence level upper limit on the branching fraction is 1.9 (2.0) $\times$ 10$^{-7}$, which is the most stringent direct limit to date on this process; the corresponding limits for the Z $\to$ e$τ$ and Z $\to$ $μτ$ channels are 13.8 (11.4) $\times$ 10$^{-6}$ and 12.0 (5.3) $\times$ 10$^{-6}$, respectively. Additionally, the e$μ$ final state is used to search for lepton flavor violating decays of Z' resonances in the mass range from 110 to 500 GeV. No significant excess is observed above the predicted background levels.
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}\rightarrow e\mu)$ for three BDT score bins and their combination, at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with 138 fb$^{-1}$.
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}\rightarrow e\mu)$ for three BDT score bins and their combination, at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with 138 fb$^{-1}$.
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}\rightarrow e\tau)$ in the hadronic- and leptonic-$\tau$ decay channels, and for their combination ($\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV, 138 fb$^{-1})$.
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}\rightarrow e\tau)$ in the hadronic- and leptonic-$\tau$ decay channels, and for their combination ($\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV, 138 fb$^{-1})$.
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}\rightarrow \mu\tau)$ in the hadronic- and leptonic-$\tau$ decay channels, and for their combination ($\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV, 138 fb$^{-1}$).
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}\rightarrow \mu\tau)$ in the hadronic- and leptonic-$\tau$ decay channels, and for their combination ($\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV, 138 fb$^{-1}$).
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma(\mathrm{pp}\rightarrow\mathrm{Z}^\prime+X)\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}^\prime\rightarrow e\mu)$ as a function of the Z′ mass (110–500 GeV), at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with 138 fb$^{-1}$.
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma(\mathrm{pp}\rightarrow\mathrm{Z}^\prime+X)\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{Z}^\prime\rightarrow e\mu)$ as a function of the Z′ mass (110–500 GeV), at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV with 138 fb$^{-1}$.
A search for long-lived particles originating from the decay of b hadrons produced in proton-proton collisions with a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV at the LHC is presented. The analysis is performed on a data set recorded in 2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 41.6 fb$^{-1}$. Interactions of the long-lived particles in the CMS endcap muon system would create hadronic or electromagnetic showers, producing clusters of detector hits. Selected events contain at least one such high-multiplicity cluster in the muon endcaps and require the presence of a displaced muon. The most stringent upper limits to date on the branching fraction $\mathcal{B}$(B $\to$ K$Φ$), where the long-lived particle $Φ$ decays to a pair of hadrons, are obtained for $Φ$ masses of 0.3$-$3.0 GeV and $Φ$ mean proper decay lengths in the range of 1$-$500 cm.
Distributions of the CSC cluster time shown for signal samples with m = 0.3 GeV, c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 100 mm, m = 1.0 GeV, c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 300 mm, m = 2.0 GeV, c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 1000 mm and the background-enriched data.
Distributions of the CSC cluster size $N_{hits}$ shown for signal samples with m = 0.3 GeV, c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 100 mm, m = 1.0 GeV, c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 300 mm, m = 2.0 GeV, c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 1000 mm and the background-enriched data.
Distributions of the $\Delta\Phi$ between the CSC cluster and the trigger muon, shown for signal samples with m = 0.3 GeV c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 100 mm, m = 1.0 GeV c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 300 mm, m = 2.0 GeV c$\tau_{\Phi}$ = 1000 mm and the background-enriched data.
The 2D distribution of the $\Delta\Phi$ (cluster, $\mu_{trigger}$) vs the number of hits in clusters, in events from the out-of-time region.
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the $B \rightarrow K \Phi$ as a function of the decay distance of the long-lived particle.
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the $B \rightarrow K \Phi$ as a function of the decay distance of the long-lived particle.
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the $B \rightarrow K \Phi$ as a function of the decay distance of the long-lived particle.
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the $B \rightarrow K \Phi$ as a function of the decay distance of the long-lived particle.
Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the $B \rightarrow K \Phi$ as a function of the decay distance of the long-lived particle.
The estimated BR limits for a range of generator parameters: $0.3 < m_{LLP}$ < 3.0 GeV and 0 < $c\tau$ < 10000 mm.
The contour of the 2D distribution which includes the generation parameter values corresponding to the BR of 0.01.
The contour of the 2D distribution which includes the generation parameter values corresponding to the BR of 0.001.
Signal cut-flow efficiencies for the hadronic shower decay mode
Signal cut-flow efficiencies for the electromagnetic shower decay mode
Using proton-proton collision data collected by the CMS experiment at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV in 2016$-$2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$, the first full reconstruction of the three vector B meson states, B$^{*+}$, B$^{*0}$, and B$^{*0}_\text{s}$, is performed. The mass differences between the excited mesons and their corresponding ground states are measured to be $m(\text{B}^{*+})-m(\text{B}^+)$ = 45.277 $\pm$ 0.039 $\pm$ 0.027 MeV, $m(\text{B}^{*0})- m(\text{B}^0)$ = 45.471 $\pm$ 0.056 $\pm$ 0.028 MeV, and $m(\text{B}^{*0}_\text{s})-m(\text{B}_\text{s})$ = 49.407 $\pm$ 0.132 $\pm$ 0.041 MeV, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second are systematic. These results improve on the precision of previous measurements by an order of magnitude.
The measured mass differences between vector and ground B meson states.
Extracted masses of $\mathrm{B}^{*+}$, $\mathrm{B}^{*0}$, and $\mathrm{B}^{*0}_{\mathrm{s}}$ mesons. The values are obtained using the measurements in Table 1 and the ground state masses from PDG 2024 (S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)), which are the source of the last uncertainties.
Extracted mass differences between vector B meson states of different flavour. The values are obtained using the measurements in Table 4 and the ground state mass differences from PDG 2024 (S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)), which are the source of the last uncertainties.
The measured differences of mass differences between vector and ground states.
The measured ratios of mass differences between vector and ground states.
An analysis of the flavour structure of dimension-6 effective field theory (EFT) operators in multilepton final states is presented, focusing on the interactions involving Z bosons. For the first time, the flavour structure of these operators is disentangled by simultaneously probing the interactions with different quark generations. The analysis targets the associated production of a top quark pair and a Z boson, as well as diboson processes in final states with at least three leptons, which can be electrons or muons. The data were recorded by the CMS experiment in the years 2016$-$2018 in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. Consistency with the standard model of particle physics is observed and limits are set on the selected Wilson coefficients, split into couplings to light- and heavy-quark generations.
Summary of the limits obtained for the Wilson coefficients.
Likelihood scan of cHqMRe1122 versus cHqMRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are fixed to zero.
Likelihood scan of cHq3MRe1122 versus cHq3MRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are fixed to zero.
Likelihood scan of cHuRe1122 versus cHuRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are fixed to zero.
Likelihood scan of cHdRe1122 versus cHdRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are fixed to zero.
Likelihood scan of cW versus cWtil. Other Wilson coefficients are fixed to zero.
Likelihood scan of cHqMRe1122 versus cHqMRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are profiled as well.
Likelihood scan of cHq3MRe1122 versus cHq3MRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are profiled as well.
Likelihood scan of cHuRe1122 versus cHuRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are profiled as well.
Likelihood scan of cHdRe1122 versus cHdRe33. Other Wilson coefficients are profiled as well.
Likelihood scan of cW versus cWtil. Other Wilson coefficients are profiled as well.
A reinterpretation of a prior narrow-resonance search is performed to investigate the resonant production of pairs of dijet resonances via broad mediators. This analysis targets events with four resolved jets, requiring dijet invariant masses greater than 0.2 TeV and four-jet invariant masses greater than 1.6 TeV. The search uses a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$ collected by the CMS experiment in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV. The reinterpretation considers the production of new heavy four-jet resonances, with widths ranging from 1.5 to 10% of their mass, which decay to a pair of dijet resonances. This analysis probes resonant production in the four-jet and dijet mass distributions. Upper limits at 95% confidence level and significances are reported on the production cross section of new resonances as functions of their widths and masses, between 2 and 10 TeV. In particular, at a four-jet resonance mass of 8.6 TeV, the local (global) significance ranges from 3.9 (1.6) to 3.6 (1.4) standard deviations (s.d.) as the resonance width is increased from 1.5 to 10%. This relative insensitivity to the choice of width indicates that a broad resonance is an equally valid interpretation of this excess. The broad resonance hypothesis at a resonance mass of 8.6 TeV is supported by the presence of an event with a four-jet mass of 5.8 TeV and an average dijet mass of 2.0 TeV. Also, we report the reinterpretation of a second effect, at a four-jet resonance mass of 3.6 TeV, which has a local (global) significance of up to 3.9 (2.2) s.d.
Observed number of events within bins of the four-jet mass and the average mass of the two dijets.
Observed number of events within bins of the four-jet mass and the ratio $\alpha$, which is the average dijet mass divided by the four-jet mass.
Predictions of a leading order (LO) QCD simulation, normalized to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The number of events are examined within bins of the four-jet mass and the average mass of the two dijets.
Predictions of a leading order (LO) QCD simulation, normalized to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The number of events are examined within bins of the four-jet mass and the ratio $\alpha$, which is the average dijet mass divided by the four-jet mass.
The 68% probability contour in the $m_{\mathrm{4j}}$ vs. $\overline{m}_{\mathrm{2j}}$ plane from a signal simulation of a diquark with a width of 1.5% and a mass of 8.4 TeV, decaying to a pair of vector-like quarks, each with a mass of 2.1 TeV.
The 68% probability contour in the $m_{\mathrm{4j}}$ vs. $\overline{m}_{\mathrm{2j}}$ plane from a signal simulation of a diquark with a width of 5% and a mass of 8.4 TeV, decaying to a pair of vector-like quarks, each with a mass of 2.1 TeV.
The 68% probability contour in the $m_{\mathrm{4j}}$ vs. $\overline{m}_{\mathrm{2j}}$ plane from a signal simulation of a diquark with a width of 10% and a mass of 8.4 TeV, decaying to a pair of vector-like quarks, each with a mass of 2.1 TeV.
The 68% probability contour in the $m_{\mathrm{4j}}$ vs. $\alpha$ plane from a signal simulation of a diquark with a width of 1.5% and a mass of 8.4 TeV, decaying to a pair of vector-like quarks, each with a mass of 2.1 TeV.
The 68% probability contour in the $m_{\mathrm{4j}}$ vs. $\alpha$ plane from a signal simulation of a diquark with a width of 5% and a mass of 8.4 TeV, decaying to a pair of vector-like quarks, each with a mass of 2.1 TeV.
The 68% probability contour in the $m_{\mathrm{4j}}$ vs. $\alpha$ plane from a signal simulation of a diquark with a width of 10% and a mass of 8.4 TeV, decaying to a pair of vector-like quarks, each with a mass of 2.1 TeV.
Signal differential distributions as a function of four-jet mass for $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, diquark masses of 2, 5, 8.6 TeV and various widths, for all $\alpha$ bins inclusively. The integral of each distribution has been normalized to unity.
The product of acceptance, $A$, and efficiency, $\varepsilon$, of a resonant signal with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25 vs. the diquark mass for various diquark widths, and for all $\alpha$ bins inclusively. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of generated events passing the kinematic selection criteria, while the efficiency is the fraction of signal events satisfying $m_{\mathrm{4j}} > 1.6$ TeV. We also show the signal acceptance alone in the curves where $\varepsilon = 1$.
The four-jet mass distribution in data for 0.22 < $\alpha$ < 0.24, fitted with three background-only functions (Dijet-3p, PowExp-3p and ModDijet-3p), each with three free parameters. Examples of predicted diquark resonances with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 8.6 TeV, and $\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 1.5%, 10% are also shown, with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% confidence level.
The four-jet mass distribution in data for 0.24 < $\alpha$ < 0.26, fitted with three background-only functions (Dijet-3p, PowExp-3p and ModDijet-3p), each with three free parameters. Examples of predicted diquark resonances with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 8.6 TeV, and $\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 1.5%, 10% are also shown, with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% confidence level.
The four-jet mass distribution in data for 0.26 < $\alpha$ < 0.28, fitted with three background-only functions (Dijet-3p, PowExp-3p and ModDijet-3p), each with three free parameters. Examples of predicted diquark resonances with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 8.6 TeV and $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.29, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 3.6 TeV, each shown for widths of $\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 1.5% and 10% are also included, with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% confidence level.
The four-jet mass distribution in data for 0.28 < $\alpha$ < 0.30, fitted with three background-only functions (Dijet-3p, PowExp-3p and ModDijet-3p), each with three free parameters. Examples of predicted diquark resonances with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 8.6 TeV and $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.29, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 3.6 TeV, each shown for widths of $\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 1.5% and 10% are also included, with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% confidence level.
The four-jet mass distribution in data for 0.30 < $\alpha$ < 0.32, fitted with three background-only functions (Dijet-3p, PowExp-3p and ModDijet-3p), each with three free parameters. Examples of predicted diquark resonances with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 8.6 TeV and $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.29, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 3.6 TeV, each shown for widths of $\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 1.5% and 10% are also included, with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% confidence level.
The four-jet mass distribution in data for 0.32 < $\alpha$ < 0.34, fitted with three background-only functions (Dijet-3p, PowExp-3p and ModDijet-3p), each with three free parameters. Examples of predicted diquark resonances with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 8.6 TeV, and $\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 1.5%, 10% are also shown, with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% confidence level.
The inclusive four-jet mass distribution in data for $\alpha$ > 0.10, fitted with three background-only functions (Dijet-5p, PowExp-5p and ModDijet-5p), each with five free parameters. Examples of predicted diquark resonances with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.25, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 8.6 TeV and $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}}$ = 0.29, $M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 3.6 TeV, each shown for widths of $\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}}$ = 1.5% and 10% are also included, with cross sections equal to the observed upper limits at 95% confidence level.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.25$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 1.5%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.25$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 5%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 5%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.25$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.11$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.13$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.15$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.17$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.19$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.21$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.23$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.27$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.29$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.31$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.33$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.42$ and width of the initial resonance Y equal to 10%. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation (s.d.) levels are also included. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate a mediator width equal to 10%.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.11$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.13$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.15$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.17$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.19$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.21$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.23$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.27$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.29$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.31$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.33$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for resonant production of paired dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}} / M_{\mathrm{Y}} = 0.42$ and widths of the initial resonance Y equal to 1.5, 5, and 10%. Limits are compared to predictions for scalar $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $\mathrm{S}_{\mathrm{dd}}$ diquarks with couplings to pairs of up and down quarks, $y_{\mathrm{uu}}$ and $y_{\mathrm{dd}}$, and to pairs of vector-like quarks, $y_{\chi}$ and $y_{\omega}$, set appropriately in order to generate the corresponding widths.
Observed local $p$-value for a four-jet resonance, Y, decaying to a pair of dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}}/M_{\mathrm{Y}}$ = 0.25, and various widths of Y superimposed.
Observed local $p$-value for a four-jet resonance, Y, decaying to a pair of dijet resonances, X, with $\alpha_{\mathrm{true}} = M_{\mathrm{X}}/M_{\mathrm{Y}}$ = 0.29, and various widths of Y superimposed.
The table presents the cumulative cutflow for a signal with $M_{\mathrm{S}} = 2.0$ TeV, $M_{\chi} = 0.5$ TeV and different width hypotheses ($\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}} =$ 1.5, 5, and 10%). Each row corresponds to the number of signal events that survive all cuts up to and including the one listed. The percentage in parentheses shows the efficiency of the current cut alone, defined as the ratio of the number of events that survive all cuts up to and including this one to the number of events that survived all previous cuts.
The table presents the cumulative cutflow for a signal with $M_{\mathrm{S}} = 5.0$ TeV, $M_{\chi} = 1.25$ TeV and different width hypotheses ($\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}} =$ 1.5, 5, and 10%). Each row corresponds to the number of signal events that survive all cuts up to and including the one listed. The percentage in parentheses shows the efficiency of the current cut alone, defined as the ratio of the number of events that survive all cuts up to and including this one to the number of events that survived all previous cuts.
The table presents the cumulative cutflow for a signal with $M_{\mathrm{S}} = 8.6$ TeV, $M_{\chi} = 2.15$ TeV and different width hypotheses ($\Gamma/M_{\mathrm{S}} =$ 1.5, 5, and 10%). Each row corresponds to the number of signal events that survive all cuts up to and including the one listed. The percentage in parentheses shows the efficiency of the current cut alone, defined as the ratio of the number of events that survive all cuts up to and including this one to the number of events that survived all previous cuts.
The transverse momentum spectra and integrated yields of $\overlineΣ^{\pm}$ have been measured in pp and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV with the ALICE experiment. Measurements are performed via the newly accessed decay channel $\overlineΣ^{\pm} \rightarrow {\rm\overline{n}}π^{\pm}$. A new method of antineutron reconstruction with the PHOS electromagnetic spectrometer is developed and applied to this analysis. The $p_{\rm T}$ spectra of $\overlineΣ^{\pm}$ are measured in the range $0.5 < p_{\rm T} < 3$ GeV/$c$ and compared to predictions of the PYTHIA 8, DPMJET, PHOJET, EPOS LHC and EPOS4 models. The EPOS LHC and EPOS4 models provide the best descriptions of the measured spectra both in pp and p-Pb collisions, while models which do not account for multiparton interactions provide a considerably worse description at high $p_{\rm T}$. The total yields of $\overlineΣ^{\pm}$ in both pp and p-Pb collisions are compared to predictions of the Thermal-FIST model and dynamical models PYTHIA 8, DPMJET, PHOJET, EPOS LHC and EPOS4. All models reproduce the total yields in both colliding systems within uncertainties. The nuclear modification factors $R_{\rm pPb}$ for both $\overlineΣ^{+}$ and $\overlineΣ^{-}$ are evaluated and compared to those of protons, $Λ$ and $Ξ$ hyperons, and predictions of EPOS LHC and EPOS4 models. No deviations of $R_{\rm pPb}$ for $\overlineΣ^{\pm}$ from the model predictions or measurements for other hadrons are found within uncertainties.
$p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yield of $\overline{\Sigma}^{+}$ in INEL pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$.
$p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yield of $\overline{\Sigma}^{-}$ in INEL pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$.
$p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yield of $\overline{\Sigma}^{+}$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y_\mathrm{CMS}|<0.5$.
$p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yield of $\overline{\Sigma}^{-}$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y_\mathrm{CMS}|<0.5$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $\overline{\Sigma}^{+}$/ $\overline{\Sigma}^{-}$ in INEL pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $\overline{\Sigma}^{+}$/ $\overline{\Sigma}^{-}$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y_\mathrm{CMS}|<0.5$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $(p+\overline{p})/(\pi^+ + \pi^-)$ in INEL pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $2\overline{\Sigma}^{+}/(\pi^+ + \pi^-)$ in INEL pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $2\overline{\Sigma}^{-}/(\pi^+ + \pi^-)$ in INEL pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $2\overline{\Sigma}^{+}/(p + \overline{p})$ in INEL pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $2\overline{\Sigma}^{-}/(p + \overline{p})$ in INEL pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y|<0.5$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $(p+\overline{p})/(\pi^+ + \pi^-)$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $-0.5<y_\mathrm{CMS}<0$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $2\overline{\Sigma}^{+}/(\pi^+ + \pi^-)$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y_\mathrm{CMS}|<0.5$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $2\overline{\Sigma}^{-}/(\pi^+ + \pi^-)$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y_\mathrm{CMS}|<0.5$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $(\Lambda + \overline{\Lambda})/(\pi^+ + \pi^-)$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $-0.5<y_\mathrm{CMS}<0$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $2\overline{\Sigma}^{+}/(p + \overline{p})$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y_\mathrm{CMS}|<0.5$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $2\overline{\Sigma}^{-}/(p + \overline{p})$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y_\mathrm{CMS}|<0.5$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $(\Lambda + \overline{\Lambda})/(p + \overline{p})$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $-0.5<y_\mathrm{CMS}<0$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $2\overline{\Sigma}^{+}/(\Lambda + \overline{\Lambda})$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y_\mathrm{CMS}|<0.5$.
Ratio of $p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential production yields of $2\overline{\Sigma}^{-}/(\Lambda + \overline{\Lambda})$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y_\mathrm{CMS}|<0.5$.
$p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential nuclear modification factor $R_\mathrm{{pPb}}$ of $\overline{\Sigma}^{+}$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y_\mathrm{CMS}|<0.5$.
$p_\mathrm{{T}}$-differential nuclear modification factor $R_\mathrm{{pPb}}$ of $\overline{\Sigma}^{-}$ in NSD p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02~\mathrm{{TeV}}$ in the rapidity interval $|y_\mathrm{CMS}|<0.5$.
A search for pseudoscalar or scalar bosons decaying to a top quark pair ($\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$) in final states with one or two charged leptons is presented. The analyzed proton-proton collision data was recorded at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The invariant mass $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ of the reconstructed $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ system and variables sensitive to its spin and parity are used to discriminate against the standard model $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ background. Interference between pseudoscalar or scalar boson production and the standard model $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ continuum is included, leading to peak-dip structures in the $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ distribution. An excess of the data above the background prediction, based on perturbative quantum chromodynamics (QCD) calculations, is observed near the kinematic $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ production threshold, while good agreement is found for high $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. The data are consistent with the background prediction if the contribution from the production of a color-singlet ${}^1\mathrm{S}_0^{[1]}$$\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ quasi-bound state $η_\mathrm{t}$, predicted by nonrelativistic QCD, is added. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are set on the coupling between the pseudoscalar or scalar bosons and the top quark for boson masses in the range 365$-$1000 GeV, relative widths between 0.5 and 25%, and two background scenarios with or without $η_\mathrm{t}$ contribution.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the A resonance signals, as a function of mass.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the A-SM interference signals, as a function of mass.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the H resonance signals, as a function of mass.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the H-SM interference signals, as a function of mass.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the A resonance signals, as a function of mass.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the A-SM interference signals, as a function of mass.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the H resonance signals, as a function of mass.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the H-SM interference signals, as a function of mass.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions create a quark-gluon plasma (QGP), a hot and dense state of strongly interacting QCD matter. In ultracentral collisions, the QGP volume remains nearly constant event-by-event, while its total entropy can fluctuate due to quantum effects, leading to temperature variations. These features allow the correlation between the mean transverse momentum $(\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle)$ of charged hadrons and their multiplicity to serve as a probe of the QGP's speed of sound, $c_{s}$. This study extracts $c_{s}$ by analyzing the relative increase in $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle$ with respect to the charged-particle density $(\langle \mathrm{d}N_\mathrm{ch}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle)$ at midrapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$, using data from the ALICE detector. Centrality is determined with estimators based on multiplicity and transverse energy, applying a pseudorapidity gap to reduce selection biases. The extracted value of $c_{s}^{2}$ is found to strongly depend on the employed centrality estimator and ranges between $0.1146 \pm 0.0028 \,\mathrm{(stat.)} \pm 0.0065 \,\mathrm{(syst.)}$ and $0.4374 \pm 0.0006 \mathrm{(stat.)} \pm 0.0184 \mathrm{(syst.)}$ in natural units. Additionally, the event-by-event $[p_{\mathrm{T}}]$ distribution is studied through its variance, skewness, and kurtosis. A pronounced decrease in the self-normalized variance and a peak followed by a drop in skewness suggest the suppression of impact-parameter fluctuations in ultracentral collisions. These observations provide new insights into the thermodynamic properties and initial-state fluctuations of the QGP.
Average number of participating nucleons ($\langle N_{\mathrm{part}} \rangle$) as a function of centrality percentile in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimators based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$, ${N_{\mathrm{tracklets}}}$, and $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ within $|\eta|\leq 0.8$.
Average number of participating nucleons ($\langle N_{\mathrm{part}} \rangle$) as a function of centrality percentile in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}} \in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
Normalized $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-spectrum ratio as a function as a function of centrality in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}} \in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta|\leq 0.8$.
Normalized $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-spectrum ratio as a function as a function of centrality in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}} \in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta|\leq 0.8$.
Normalized $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-spectrum ratio as a function as a function of centrality in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{tracklets}} \in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta|\leq 0.8$.
Normalized $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-spectrum ratio as a function as a function of centrality in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}} \in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
Event fraction distribution as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}} \in -3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
Event fraction distribution as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}} \in |\eta|\leq 0.8$.
Event fraction distribution as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}} \in |\eta|\leq 0.8$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta| \leq 0.8$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta| \leq 0.8$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{tracklets}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{tracklets}}$ $\in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta| \leq 0.8$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{tracklets}}$ $\in$ $0.3 \leq |\eta| \leq 0.6$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{tracklets}}$ $\in$ $0.7 \leq |\eta| \leq 1$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
Extracted $c_{\mathrm{s}}^{2}$ as a function of the minimum pseudorapidity gap between the centrality estimation and transverse-momentum spectra measurement in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$.
$k_{2}/k_{2}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$k_{2}/k_{2}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$k_{2}/k_{2}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
$k_{3}/k_{3}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$k_{3}/k_{3}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$k_{3}/k_{3}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
$\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
$\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] angle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
$\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta| \leq 0.8$ with $0.45 \leq p_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 50~\mathrm{GeV}/c.$.
The traditional quark model accounts for the existence of baryons, such as protons and neutrons, which consist of three quarks, as well as mesons, composed of a quark-antiquark pair. Only recently has substantial evidence started to accumulate for exotic states composed of four or five quarks and antiquarks. The exact nature of their internal structure remains uncertain. This paper reports the first measurement of quantum numbers of the recently discovered family of three all-charm tetraquarks, using data collected by the CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider from 2016 to 2018. The angular analysis techniques developed for the discovery and characterization of the Higgs boson have been applied to the new exotic states. Here we show that the quantum numbers for parity $P$ and charge conjugation $C$ symmetries are found to be +1. The spin $J$ of these exotic states is consistent with 2$\hbar$, while 0$\hbar$ and 1$\hbar$ are excluded at 95% and 99% confidence level, respectively. The $J^{PC} = 2^{++}$ assignment implies particular configurations of constituent spins and orbital angular momenta, which constrain the possible internal structure of these tetraquarks.
Summary of statistical tests.
Results from hypothesis test for pairs of spin-parity models.
The $\mathrm{J}/\psi\mathrm{J}/\psi$ invariant mass distribution in data.
Distributions of discriminant for the $2_{m}^{+}$ and $0^{-}$ models.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance on the query string syntax can also be found in the OpenSearch documentation.
We support searching for a range of records using their HEPData record ID or Inspire ID.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.