Cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=OBSERVED).

Cross section as a function of LOG10(Q**2).

Cross section as a function of PT(P=4,RF=CM).

Cross section as a function of ETARAP(P=4).

Single differential visible cross section as a function of LOG(X).

Single differential visible cross section as a function of ETARAP.

Single differential visible cross section as a function of Q**2.

Single differential visible cross section as a function of Z.

Double differential visible cross section as a function of ETARAP and Q**2.

Double differential visible cross section as a function of PT and Q**2.

Double differential visible cross section as a function of ETARAP and Z.

Double differential visible cross section as a function of PT and ETARAP.

Double differential visible cross section as a function of PT and Z.

The inclusive visible D*+ cross section extracted in the DGLAP scheme.

The charm structure function extracted in both the DGLAP and CCFM scheme.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles emittedon an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.7 < ETA RAP < 2.02, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudo rapidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.22 < ET ARAP < 2.5, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudo rapidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.38 < ET ARAP < 2.34, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseud orapidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.54 < ET ARAP < 2.18, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseud orapidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.7 < ETA RAP < 2.02, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudo rapidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.22 < ET ARAP < 2.5, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudo rapidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.38 < ET ARAP < 2.34, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseud orapidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.54 < ET ARAP < 2.18, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseud orapidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.7 < ETA RAP < 2.02, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudo rapidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.22 < ET ARAP < 2.5, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudo rapidity. ET distributions define centrality, tipically by a certain upper perc entile of the distribution. In the table centrality denoted as ZCAL(Zero de gree CALorimeter).

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.38 < ET ARAP < 2.34, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseud orapidity. ET distributions define centrality, tipically by a certain upper perc entile of the distribution. In the table centrality denoted as ZCAL(Zero de gree CALorimeter).

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.54 < ET ARAP < 2.18, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseud orapidity. ET distributions define centrality, tipically by a certain upper perc entile of the distribution. In the table centrality denoted as ZCAL(Zero de gree CALorimeter).

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.7 < ETA RAP < 2.02, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudo rapidity. ET distributions define centrality, tipically by a certain upper perc entile of the distribution. In the table centrality denoted as ZCAL(Zero de gree CALorimeter).

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.22 < ET ARAP < 2.5, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudo rapidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.38 < ET ARAP < 2.34, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseud orapidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.54 < ET ARAP < 2.18, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseud orapidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.7 < ETA RAP < 2.02, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudo rapidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.22 ETAR AP < 2.50, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudor apidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.38 ETAR AP < 2.34, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudor apidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.54 ETAR AP < 2.18, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudor apidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.7 ETARA P < 2.02, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudora pidity.

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.22 ETAR AP < 2.50, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudor apidity. ET distributions define centrality, tipically by a certain upper perc entile of the distribution. In the table centrality denoted as ZCAL(Zero de gree CALorimeter).

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.38 ETAR AP < 2.34, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudor apidity. ET distributions define centrality, tipically by a certain upper perc entile of the distribution. In the table centrality denoted as ZCAL(Zero de gree CALorimeter).

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.54 ETAR AP < 2.18, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudor apidity. ET distributions define centrality, tipically by a certain upper perc entile of the distribution. In the table centrality denoted as ZCAL(Zero de gree CALorimeter).

ET is defined as the sum of Ei*Sin(THETAi) taken over all particles em itted on an event. The full ETARAP acceptance of the half-azimuth calorimeter, 1.7 ETARA P < 2.02, is subdivided into eight nominally equal bins of 0.16 in pseudora pidity. ET distributions define centrality, tipically by a certain upper perc entile of the distribution. In the table centrality denoted as ZCAL(Zero de gree CALorimeter).

The differential dijet cross section dsig/dM.

The differential dijet cross section dsig/dET of the leading jet in the Breit frame.

The differential cross section dsig/detarap of the leading jet in the Breitframe.

The differential cross section dsig/dET of the non-leading jet in the Breitframe.

The differential cross section dsig/detarap of the non-leading jet in the Breit frame.

The differential inclusive cross section dsig/dQ**2.

The differential dijet cross section dsig/dQ**2.

The dijet fraction.

The measured values of ALPHA_S determined from the QCD fit to the measured dijet fraction. The first systematic (DSYS) error is the systematic uncertainty not associated with the energy scales of the jets, the second is associated with the energy scales and the third DSYS error is the total theoretical uncertainty.

The measured value of ALPHA_S at the Z0 mass determined from the QCD fit tothe measured dijet spectrum. The first DSYS error is the total experimental systematic uncertainty and the second is the total theoretical systematic uncertainty.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of the invariant mass of the diffractive system (X).

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of W.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of BETA=X/X(NAME=POMERON).

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), the fraction of the hadronic final state energy of the DD system which is contained in the two jets.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of X(NAME=GAMMA,C=JETS), the fraction ofthe photon momentum which enters the hard scattering.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of E(NAME=REM,C=GAMMA), the energy sum of all final state hadrons in the photon hemisphere (ETARAP<0) which lie outside the two hightest PT(RF=CM) jet cones.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the LOG10(X(NAME=POMERON)) range -1.5 TO -1.3.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the LOG10(X(NAME=POMERON)) range -1.75 TO -1.5.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the LOG10(X(NAME=POMERON)) range -2.0 TO -1.75.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the LOG10(X(NAME=POMERON)) range < -2.0.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the Q**2 + PT**2 range 20 TO 35 GEV**2.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the Q**2 + PT**2 range 35 TO 45 GEV**2.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the Q**2 + PT**2 range 45 TO 60 GEV**2.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), for the Q**2 + PT**2 range > 60 GEV**2.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Q**2 for the restricted interval X(NAME=POMERON) < 0.01.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of the average transverse momentum of the two jets in the c.m.frame for the restricted interval X(NAME=POMERON) < 0.01.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=JETS), the fraction of the hadronic final state energy of the DD system which is contained in the two jets for the restricted interval X(NAME=POMERON) < 0.01.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level dijet cross section as a function of PT(NAME=REM,C=POMERON), the PT sum of all final state hadrons in the pomeron hemisphere (ETARAP>0) which lie outside the two hightest PT(RF=CM) jet cones.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level three-jet cross section as a function of the invariant mass of the 3 jet system.

Average values, over the specified interval, of the differential hadron level three-jet cross section as a function of Z(NAME=POMERON,C=3-JETS).

The differential dijet cross section as a function of ETARAP for the neutron-tagged data set. The second DSYS error is due to the uncertainty in the calorimeter energy scale.

Differential cross section as a function of X(C=PI,OBS), the function of the exchanged pion's momentum participating in the production of the dijet system for the neutral-tagged sample. The errors shown have the statistical and main systematic errors added in quadrature. The DSYS error is the systematic error due to the uncertainty in thecalorimeter energy scale. In addition for the neutron-tagged data there is an extra 9 PCT overall error (not shown).

Total cross section of charm quark pair production using the anti-tagged events and extrapolated to the full kinematic region. The results are given seperately for the direct and single-resolved contribution. The second systematic error (DSYS) is the error in the extrapolation.

Cross section for D* production observed in the tagged events shown corrected using the HERWIG and Vermaseren Monte Carlo generators seperately and the average value.

Total charm cross section from the tagged events for the Q**2 range 5 to 100 GeV**2.

Measurement of the charm structure function of the photon (F2(C=CHARM)).

The differential cross section w.r.t. W the virtual photon centre of mass energy from the K2PI final state. The asymmetric errors are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic errors. The statistical errors are also shown separately.

The differential cross section w.r.t. X(C=D*), the fractional momentum of the D* in the virtual photon-proton centre of mass system, from the K2PI final state. The asymmetric errors are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic errors. The statistical errors are also shown separately.

The differential cross section w.r.t. to transverse momentum of the D* fromthe K2PI final state. The asymmetric errors are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic errors. The statistical errors are also shown separately.

The differential cross section w.r.t. to transverse momentum of the D* fromthe K4PI final state. The asymmetric errors are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic errors. The statistical errors are also shown separately.

The differential cross section w.r.t. the pseudorapidity of the D* from theK2PI data. The asymmetric errors are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic errors. The statistical errors are also shown separately.

The differential cross section w.r.t. the pseudorapidity of the D* from theK4PI data. The asymmetric errors are the quadratic sum of the statistical and systematic errors. The statistical errors are also shown separately.

The cross sections for D* production from the K2PI final state as a function of Q**2 and Y.

The cross sections for D* production from the K2PI final state as a function of Q**2 and Y.

The cross sections for D* production from the K2PI final state as a function of Q**2 and Y.

The cross sections for D* production from the K2PI final state as a function of Q**2 and Y.

The cross sections for D* production from the K2PI final state as a function of Q**2 and Y.

The cross sections for D* production from the K2PI final state as a function of Q**2 and Y.

The cross sections for D* production from the K2PI final state as a function of Q**2 and Y.

The cross sections for D* production from the K2PI final state as a function of Q**2 and Y.

The cross sections for D* production from the K4PI final state as a function of Q**2 and Y.

The cross sections for D* production from the K4PI final state as a function of Q**2 and Y.

The cross sections for D* production from the K4PI final state as a function of Q**2 and Y.

The cross sections for D* production from the K4PI final state as a function of Q**2 and Y.

The charmed structure function F2(C=CHARM) derived from a combination of the K2PI and K4PI data. There are additional systematic uncertainties described in the text of the paper which include the 1.65 PCT luminosity uncertainty and a 9 PCT uncertainty in the charm hadronization fraction to D*+-.