The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded inclusive leptonic asymmetry. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ < 500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [500,750] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [750,1000] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [1000,1500] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ > 1500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ < 30 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [30,120] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ > 120 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 200 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [200,300] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [300,400] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 400 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 20 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [20, 70] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 70 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Here THETA is the angle (in c.m. system) between the plane containing partons 1 and 3 and the plane containing partons 4 and 5: cos(theta) = [p1*p3]*[p4*p ]/(|[p1*p3]|*|[p4*p5]|). The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT.

Here M is scaled invariant mass of jet pairs. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT.

Here M is scaled invariant mass of jet pairs. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT.

Here M is scaled invariant mass of jet pairs. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT.

The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of cosine of space angles between pairs of jets for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of cosine of space angles between pairs of jets for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of cosine of space angles between pairs of jets for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of cosine of space angles between pairs of jets for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of cosine of space angles between pairs of jets for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of cosine of space angles between pairs of jets for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of scaled jets pair masses for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of scaled jets pair masses for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of scaled jets pair masses for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of scaled jets pair masses for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of scaled jets pair masses for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of scaled jets pair masses for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. Here THETA is 'Bengtsson-Zerwas' (BZ) angle defined as COS(THETA(N=BZ)) = [p3*p4]*[p5*p6]/(|p3*p4|*|p5*p6|), where P(i) are jet momentum in the center-o f-mass frame.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. Here THETA is 'Nachtmann-Reiter' (NR) angle defined as COS(THETA(N=NR))= (p3-p4)*(p5-p6)/(|p3-p4|*|p5-p6|).

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

V0 V0 cross section for PI- on C target.

V0 V0 cross section for SIGMA- on CU target.

V0 V0 cross section for SIGMA- on C target.

Feynman X distributions of the first LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA K0S production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the K0S in LAMBDA K0S production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA K0S production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the K0S in LAMBDA K0S production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA K0S production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the K0S in LAMBDA K0S production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first K0s in K0S K0S production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second K0s in K0S K0S production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first K0s in K0S K0S production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second K0s in K0S K0S production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first K0s in K0S K0S production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second K0s in K0S K0S production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR K0S production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the K0S in LAMBDABAR K0S production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR K0S production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the K0S in LAMBDABAR K0S production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR K0S production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the K0S in LAMBDABAR K0S production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production from SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production from PI- on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the first LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production from N on C and CU targets.

Feynman X distributions of the second LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production from N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDA production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA K0S production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the K0S in LAMBDA K0S production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA K0S production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the K0S in LAMBDA K0S production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDA in LAMBDA K0S production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the K0S in LAMBDA K0S production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first K0S in K0S K0S production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second K0S in K0S K0S production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first K0S in K0S K0S production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second K0S in K0S K0S production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first K0S in K0S K0S production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second K0S in K0S K0S production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the first LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the second LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR K0S production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the K0S in LAMBDABAR K0S production for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR K0S production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the K0S in LAMBDABAR K0S production for PI- on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the LAMBDABAR in LAMBDABAR K0S production for N on C and CU targets.

Transverse momentum distributions of the K0S in LAMBDABAR K0S production for N on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA LAMBDA production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,second LAMBDA) member of the pair for N on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA LAMBDA production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,second LAMBDA) member of the pair for PI- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA LAMBDA production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,second LAMBDA) member of the pair for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,LAMBDABAR) member of the pair for N on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,LAMBDABAR) member of the pair for PI- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA LAMBDABAR production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,LAMBDABAR) member of the pair for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,K0S) member of the pair for N on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,K0S) member of the pair for PI- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDA K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDA) and the slow (P=4,K0S) member of the pair for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first LAMBDABAR) and the slow (P=4,second LAMBDABAR) member of the pair for N on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first LAMBDABAR) and the slow (P=4,second LAMBDABAR) member of the pair for PI- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDABAR LAMBDABAR production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first LAMBDABAR) and the slow (P=4,second LAMBDABAR) member of the pair for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDABAR K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDABAR) and the slow (P=4,K0S) member of the pair for N on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDABAR K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDABAR) and the slow (P=4,K0S) member of the pair for PI- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for LAMBDABAR K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,LAMBDABAR) and the slow (P=4,K0S) member of the pair for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for K0S K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first K0S) and the slow (P=4,second K0S) member of the pair for N on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for K0S K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first K0S) and the slow (P=4,second K0S) member of the pair for PI- on C and CU targets.

Differential cross section for K0S K0S production as a function of the difference in XF between the fast (P=3,first K0S) and the slow (P=4,second K0S) member of the pair for SIGMA- on C and CU targets.

Cross section as a function of Feynman X for F2PRIME(1525) production with SIGMA- on CU and C targets.

Cross section as a function of transverse momentum for F2PRIME(1525) production with SIGMA- on CU and C targets.

No description provided.