This work aims to differentiate strangeness produced from hard processes (jet-like) and softer processes (underlying event) by measuring the angular correlation between a high-momentum trigger hadron (h) acting as a jet-proxy and a produced strange hadron ($\phi(1020)$ meson). Measuring h$-\phi$ correlations at midrapidity in p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV as a function of event multiplicity provides insight into the microscopic origin of strangeness enhancement in small collision systems. The jet-like and the underlying-event-like strangeness production are investigated as a function of event multiplicity. They are also compared between a lower and higher momentum region. The evolutions of the per-trigger yields within the near-side (aligned with the trigger hadron) and away-side (in the opposite direction of the trigger hadron) jets are studied separately, allowing for the characterization of two distinct jet-like production regimes. Furthermore, the h$-\phi$ correlations within the underlying event give access to a production regime dominated by soft production processes, which can be compared directly to the in-jet production. Comparisons between h$-\phi$ and dihadron correlations show that the observed strangeness enhancement is largely driven by the underlying event, where the $\phi/\mathrm{h}$ ratio is significantly larger than within the jet regions. As multiplicity increases, the fraction of the total $\phi(1020)$ yield coming from jets decreases compared to the underlying event production, leading to high-multiplicity events being dominated by the increased strangeness production from the underlying event.
Pet-trigger h--$\phi$ and h--h pair yields within the near and away-side jet peaks as a function of charged particle multiplicity in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV in the pseudorapidity region $|\eta|<0.8$. Pairs consist of a trigger hadron in the range $4.0 < p_{\mathrm{T, trig}} < 8.0 \mathrm{~GeV}/c$ and an associated $\phi$(1020) (h) in the range $1.5 < p_{\mathrm{T, assoc}} < 2.5 \mathrm{~GeV}/c$.
Pet-trigger h--$\phi$ and h--h pair yields within the near and away-side jet peaks as a function of charged particle multiplicity in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV in the pseudorapidity region $|\eta|<0.8$. Pairs consist of a trigger hadron in the range $4.0 < p_{\mathrm{T, trig}} < 8.0 \mathrm{~GeV}/c$ and an associated $\phi$(1020) (h) in the range $2.5 < p_{\mathrm{T, assoc}} < 4.0 \mathrm{~GeV}/c$.
Pairwise (h--$\phi$)/(h--h) ratio vs $\langle N_{\mathrm{ch}} \rangle$ for the lower associated momentum range, $1.5 < p_{\mathrm{T, assoc}} < 2.5 \mathrm{~GeV}/c$ in p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV in the pseudorapidity region $|\eta|<0.8$.
A search for top squark pair production in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV is performed using events with a single isolated electron or muon, jets, and a large transverse momentum imbalance. The results are based on data collected in 2016 with the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 inverse femtobarns. No significant excess of events is observed above the expectation from standard model processes. Exclusion limits are set in the context of supersymmetric models of pair production of top squarks that decay either to a top quark and a neutralino or to a bottom quark and a chargino. Depending on the details of the model, we exclude top squarks with masses as high as 1120 GeV. Detailed information is also provided to facilitate theoretical interpretations in other scenarios of physics beyond the standard model.
Result of the background estimates and data yields corresponding to 35.9 $\text{fb}^\text{$-$1}$ for the 27 signal regions.
Result of the background estimates and data yields corresponding to 35.9 $\text{fb}^\text{$-$1}$ for the 4 signal regions dedicated to compressed spectra.
The observed exclusion limits at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction for direct top squark pair production with decay $\widetilde{t}\widetilde{t} \rightarrow t \widetilde{\chi_1^0} t \widetilde{\chi_1^0}$.
Forum