MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) in PP collision

MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV.

The ratio of theory to data, for the ratio of the pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV. The total uncertainties on the data points are provided in the column entitled 'DATA UNCERTAINTIES'. The theory points are from the NLO pQCD calculations of DSSZ, EPS09, nCTEQ15, and EPPS16 nPDFs, using CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The ratio of theory to data, for the ratio of the pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV. The total uncertainties on the data points are provided in the column entitled 'DATA UNCERTAINTIES'. The theory points are from the NLO pQCD calculations of DSSZ, EPS09, nCTEQ15, and EPPS16 nPDFs, using CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

$\pi^0$ spectra from figure 3a from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ spectra from figure 3a from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ spectra from figure 3a from 40-60% semi-peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ spectra supplemental to figure 3a from 60-90% peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

Ratio of $\pi^0$ spectra from the PbSc to the combined spectra from figure 3b from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\pi^0$ spectra from the PbGl to the combined spectra from figure 3b from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\pi^0$ spectra from the PbSc to the combined spectra from figure 3c from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\pi^0$ spectra from the PbGl to the combined spectra from figure 3c from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\pi^0$ spectra from the PbSc to the combined spectra from figure 3d from 40-60% semi-peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\pi^0$ spectra from the PbGl to the combined spectra from figure 3d from 40-60% semi-peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

$\eta$ spectra from figure 3e from minimum bias Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ spectra from figure 3e from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ spectra from figure 3e from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ spectra from figure 3e from 40-60% semi-peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ spectra supplemental to figure 3e from 60-90% peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

Ratio of $\eta$ spectra from the PbSc to the combined spectra from figure 3f from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\eta$ spectra from the PbGl to the combined spectra from figure 3f from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\eta$ spectra from the PbSc to the combined spectra from figure 3g from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\eta$ spectra from the PbGl to the combined spectra from figure 3g from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\eta$ spectra from the PbSc to the combined spectra from figure 3h from 40-60% semi-peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

Ratio of $\eta$ spectra from the PbGl to the combined spectra from figure 3h from 40-60% semi-peripheral Au+Cu collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Systematic noncorr. uncertainties are uncorrelated between PbSc and PbGl subsystems.

$\eta/\pi^0$ ratio from figure 4 from minimum bias Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point.

$\eta/\pi^0$ ratio from figure 4 from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point.

$\eta/\pi^0$ ratio from figure 4 from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point.

$\eta/\pi^0$ ratio from figure 4 from 40-60% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point.

$\eta/\pi^0$ ratio supplemental to figure 4 from 60-90% peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5a from 0-10% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5b from 10-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5c from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5a from 0-20% central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5d from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5b from 20-40% semi-central Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5e from 40-60% semi-peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5c from 40-60% semi-peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5f from minimum bias Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ $R_{AB}$ from figure 5f from minimum bias Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ supplemental to figure 5 from 60-90% peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\eta$ $R_{AB}$ supplemental to figure 5 from 60-90% peripheral Cu+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ supplemental to figure 6a from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ supplemental to figure 6b from 0-10% central Cu+Cu collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ $R_{AB}$ supplemental to figure 6b from 40-50% semi-central Au+Au collisions. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ for $p_T>5$ GeV/$c$ in Cu+Au collisions as a function of centrality from figure 7a. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ for $p_T>5$ GeV/$c$ in Au+Au collisions as a function of centrality from figure 7a. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ for $p_T>10$ GeV/$c$ in Cu+Au collisions as a function of centrality from figure 7b. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

$\pi^0$ for $p_T>10$ GeV/$c$ in Au+Au collisions as a function of centrality from figure 7b. Type A uncertainties are uncorrelated point-to-point. Type B uncertainties are correlated point-to-point. Type C uncertainties affect the scale of the data.

Direct photon spectra(Nucl. Part. Phys. 23, A1 (1997)) normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in p+p at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 63 GeV.

Direct photon spectra(Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 51, 836 (1990)) normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in p+p at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 63 GeV.

Direct photon spectra normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 62.4 GeV.

Direct photon spectra normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 39.0 GeV.

Direct photon spectra(Physical Review C91, 064904 (2015)) normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV.

Direct photon spectra(Physical Review Letters 104, 132301 (2010)) normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV.

Direct photon spectra(Physical Review Letters 109, 152302 (2012)) normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV.

Direct photon spectra(Physical Review C98, 054902 (2018)) normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV.

Direct photon spectra(Physics Letters B754 235 (2016)) normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in Pb+Pb at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 2760 GeV.

Number of binary collisions N_{coll} vs. Charged particle multiplicity in Au+Au at various cm energies.

Charged particle multiplicity vs. centrality in Au+Au at various cm energies.

Number of binary collisions N_{coll} vs. centrality in Au+Au at various cm energies.

Integrated direct photon yield vs. Charged particle multiplicity in various systems at various cm energies.

Charged particle multiplicity vs. centrality in various systems at various cm energies.

Integrated direct photon yield vs. centrality in various systems at various cm energies.

Integrated direct photon yield vs. Charged particle multiplicity in various systems at various cm energies.

Charged particle multiplicity vs. centrality in various systems at various cm energies.

Integrated direct photon yield vs. centrality in various systems at various cm energies.

$v_3$for 0-5% central p+Au collisions

$v_3$for 0-5% central d+Au collisions

$v_3$for 0-5% central $^3$He+Au collisions

Second order and third order flow for pAu collisions from SONIC model in 0-5 central collisions

Second order and third order flow for pAu collisions from iEBE-VISHNU model in 0-5 central collisions

Second order and third order flow for pAu collisions from MSTV model in 0-5 central collisions

Second order and third order flow for dAu collisions from SONIC model in 0-5 central collisions

Second order and third order flow for dAu collisions from iEBE-VISHNU in 0-5 central collisions

Second order and third order flow for dAu collisions from MSTV model in 0-5 central collisions

Second order and third order flow for 3HeAu collisions from SONIC model in 0-5 central collisions

Second order and third order flow for 3HeAu collisions from iEBE-VISHNU in 0-5 central collisions

Second order and third order flow for 3HeAu collisions from MSTV model in 0-5 central collisions

Second order flow for pAu collisions 20-40 centrality bins

Inclusive unlike-sign $\mu \mu$ pair yield from $p$+$p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV as a function of mass in different $p_T$ slices for the south and north muon arms and the ratio of data to expected sources.

Inclusive unlike-sign $\mu \mu$ pair yield from $p$+$p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV as a function of mass in different $p_T$ slices for the south and north muon arms and the ratio of data to expected sources.

Inclusive like-sign $\mu \mu$ pair yield from $p$+$p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV as a function of mass in different $p_T$ slices for the south and north muon arms and the ratio of data to expected sources.

Inclusive like-sign $\mu \mu$ pair yield from $p$+$p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV as a function of mass in different $p_T$ slices for the south and north muon arms and the ratio of data to expected sources.

Inclusive like-sign $\mu \mu$ pair yield from $p$+$p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV as a function of mass in different $p_T$ slices for the south and north muon arms and the ratio of data to expected sources.

The $\mu \mu$ pair data in the charm mass region as a function of $\Delta \phi$.

The $\mu \mu$ pair data in the charm mass region as a function of $\Delta \phi.$

The $\mu \mu$ pair data in the charm mass region as a function of pair $p_T$.

The $\mu \mu$ pair data in the charm mass region as a function of pair $p_T$

The like-sign $\mu \mu$ pair data in the bottom mass region as a function of $\Delta \phi$.

The like-sign $\mu \mu$ pair data in the bottom mass region as a function of $\Delta \phi$.

The like-sign $\mu \mu$ pair data in the bottom mass region as a function of pair $p_T$.

The like-sign $\mu \mu$ pair data in the bottom mass region as a function of pair $p_T$.

The unlike-sign $\mu \mu$ pair data used to determine the Drell-Yan contribution as a function of mass.

The unlike-sign $\mu \mu$ pair data used to determine the Drell-Yan contribution as a function of mass.

The unlike-sign $\mu \mu$ pair data used to determine the Drell-Yan contribution as a function of pair $p_T$.

The unlike-sign $\mu \mu$ pair data used to determine the Drell-Yan contribution as a function of pair $p_T$.

Summary of arm-averaged relative systematic uncertainties for the total bottom cross section $\sigma _{b\bar{b}}$, the differential Drell-Yan cross section $d^{2}\sigma _{DY\implies \mu\mu}/dmdy$, and the $b\bar{b}$ ($c\bar{c}$) differential yields $dN_{b\bar{b}(c\bar{c})\implies \mu\mu}/d\Delta\phi$. The systematic uncertainty type is indicated in the second column and is applicable only to the differential measurements. The uncertainties for the differential measurements vary with azimuthal opening angle, pair $p_{T}$ , or mass. Asymmetric uncertainties are quoted in bracketed values. For the $c\bar{c}$ measurement, the regions $\Delta\phi$ < $\pi$/2, $p_{T}$ < 0.5 GeV/$c$ and $p_{T}$ > 2.0 GeV/$c$ are excluded because the yield approaches zero and relative systematic uncertainties diverge. With these regions excluded, the difference between the systematic uncertainties of all measurements for the south and north muon arms differs by no greater than 2% for all systematic uncertainties sources.

The differential yield $dN/d\phi$ of unlike-sign muon pairs from charm with mass 1.5-2.5 GeV/$c^2$ in the ideal muon arm acceptance, as a function of the pair azimuthal opening angle. Statistical (stat.) and types B and C systematic errors (sys. B & sys. C) are all $10^{-9}\times$[rad$^{-1}$].

The differential yield $dN/d\phi$ of like-sign muon pairs from bottom with mass 3.5-10.0 GeV/$c^2$ in the ideal muon arm acceptance, as a function of the pair azimuthal opening angle. Statistical (stat.) and types B and C systematic errors (sys. B & sys. C) are all $10^{-9}\times$[rad$^{-1}$].

The differential yield $dN/dp_{T}$ of unlike-sign muon pairs from bottom with mass 1.5-2.5 GeV/$c^2$ in the ideal muon arm acceptance, as a function of the pair transverse momentum. Statistical (stat.) and types B and C systematic errors (sys. B & sys. C) are all $10^{-9}\times$[$c$/GeV].

The differential yield $dN/dp_{T}$ of like-sign muon pairs from bottom with mass 3.5-10.0 GeV/$c^2$ in the ideal muon arm acceptance, as a function of the pair transverse momentum. Statistical (stat.) and types B and C systematic errors (sys. B & sys. C) are all $10^{-9}\times$[$c$/GeV].

$\sigma_{b\bar{b}}$ from fit using different models. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

The differential Drell-Yan cross section $\frac{d^{2}\sigma}{dmdy}$ as a function of the muon pair mass, where the muon pair rapidity |$y\mu\mu$| is between 1.2 and 2.2. Statistical (stat.) and types B and C systematic errors (sys. B & sys. C) are all $10^{-9}\times$[pb $c^2$/GeV]. In the data table below, the value of mass correspond to the center of the stated range.

The differential Drell-Yan cross section $\frac{1}{2\pi p_{T}} \frac{d^{2}\sigma}{dydp_{T}}$ as a function of the muon pair transverse momentum, where the muon pair mass $m_{\mu\mu}$ is between 4.8 and 8.2 GeV/$c^2$ and the muon pair rapidity |$y\mu\mu$| is between 1.2 and 2.2. Statistical (stat.) and types B and C systematic errors (sys. B & sys. C) are all $10^{-9}\times$[pb $c^2$/GeV]. In the data table below, the value of p_T correspond to the center of the stated range.

The per-trigger yields are shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in several $p_T^{trig}$ $\otimes$ $p_T^{assoc}$ bins.

The per-trigger yields are shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in several $p_T^{trig}$ $\otimes$ $p_T^{assoc}$ bins.

The per-trigger yields are shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in several $p_T^{trig}$ $\otimes$ $p_T^{assoc}$ bins.

The per-trigger yields are shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in several $p_T^{trig}$ $\otimes$ $p_T^{assoc}$ bins.

The per-trigger yields are shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in several $p_T^{trig}$ $\otimes$ $p_T^{assoc}$ bins.

The per-trigger yields are shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in several $p_T^{trig}$ $\otimes$ $p_T^{assoc}$ bins.

The per-trigger yields are shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in several $p_T^{trig}$ $\otimes$ $p_T^{assoc}$ bins.

The per-trigger yields are shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in several $p_T^{trig}$ $\otimes$ $p_T^{assoc}$ bins.

The per-trigger yields are shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in several $p_T^{trig}$ $\otimes$ $p_T^{assoc}$ bins.

The per-trigger yields are shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in several $p_T^{trig}$ $\otimes$ $p_T^{assoc}$ bins.

The per-trigger yields are shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ in several $p_T^{trig}$ $\otimes$ $p_T^{assoc}$ bins.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown for dihadron and direct photon-hadron correlations, binned in $p^{trig}_T$ in $x_E$.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown for dihadron and direct photon-hadron correlations, binned in $p^{trig}_T$ in $x_E$.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown for dihadron and direct photon-hadron correlations, binned in $p^{trig}_T$ in $x_E$.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown for dihadron and direct photon-hadron correlations, binned in $p^{trig}_T$ in $x_E$.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown for dihadron and direct photon-hadron correlations, binned in $p^{trig}_T$ in $x_E$.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown for dihadron and direct photon-hadron correlations, binned in $p^{trig}_T$ in $x_E$.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown for dihadron and direct photon-hadron correlations, binned in $p^{trig}_T$ in $x_E$.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown for dihadron and direct photon-hadron correlations, binned in $p^{trig}_T$ in $x_E$.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown for dihadron and direct photon-hadron correlations, binned in $p^{trig}_T$ in $x_E$.

The nonperturbative away-side jet widths as a function of $p^{trig}_T$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV for both direct photon-hadron and dihadron correlations.

The nonperturbative away-side jet widths as a function of $p^{trig}_T$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV for both direct photon-hadron and dihadron correlations.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown in several bins of $x_E$, integrated over a range of $p_T^{trig}$.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown in several bins of $x_E$, integrated over a range of $p_T^{trig}$.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown in several bins of $x_E$, integrated over a range of $p_T^{trig}$.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown in several bins of $x_E$, integrated over a range of $p_T^{trig}$.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown in several bins of $x_E$, integrated over a range of $p_T^{trig}$.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown in several bins of $x_E$, integrated over a range of $p_T^{trig}$.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown in several bins of $x_E$, integrated over a range of $p_T^{trig}$.

The $p_{out}$ distributions are shown in several bins of $x_E$, integrated over a range of $p_T^{trig}$.

The Gaussian widths of $p_{out}$ as a function of $x_E$ are shown for both $\pi^0$ and direct photon triggered correlations.

The nonperturbative Gaussian widths are shown as a function of $x_E$ for $\sqrt{s}$ = 510 GeV. The points for $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV are given in figure 8 and its associated table.

The nonperturbative Gaussian widths are shown as a function of $x_E$ for $\sqrt{s}$ = 510 GeV. The points for $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV are given in figure 8 and its associated table.