Distribution of $m_{{\rm T}2}(\ell, \tau_{\mathrm{had}})$ for events passing all the lepton-hadron HM signal region requirements, except that on the variable itself. The SM background process have been normalised using a fit to the data observed in CRs.

Expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the (scalar top, scalar tau) mass plane from the combination of all selections.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the (scalar top, scalar tau) mass plane from the combination of all selections.

The region / analysis with the best expected upper limit on the signal cross-section (95% CL) as a function of the stop and stau masses. 1: SRLM, 2: SRHH, 3: two-lepton channel analysis, 5: SRHM.

The 95% CL excluded cross section times branching ratio, using the best expected SR / analysis for each mass point.

The cut flow on the raw generated events for the signal point (scalar top mass, scalar tau mass) = (337,148) GeV for the hadron-hadron SR. The production cross section for this signal point is $1.00 \pm 0.14$ pb. Quality Cuts indicate a set of cuts applied to ensure good quality events in data. A full description of the cuts used is given in the text. The original input file has a filter applied to it that ensures that all the events have $E_T^{miss}>60$ GeV or one electron or muon with $p_\mathrm{T} > 20$ GeV at truth level. After the filter is applied (efficiency = 0.883) there are 100000 events remaining.

The cut flow on the raw generated events for the signal point (scalar top mass, scalar tau mass) = (195,87) GeV for the lepton-hadron LM SR. The production cross section for this signal point is $21 \pm 3$ pb. Quality Cuts indicate a set of cuts applied to ensure good quality events in data. A full description of the cuts used is given in the text. The original input file has a filter applied to it that ensures that all the events have $E_T^{miss}<60$ GeV and one electron or muon with $p_\mathrm{T} > 20$ GeV at truth level. After the filter is applied (efficiency = 0.117) there are 50000 events remaining before applying the event weights.

The cut flow on the raw generated events for the signal point (scalar top mass, scalar tau mass) = (391,337) GeV for the lepton-hadron HM SR. The production cross section for this signal point is $0.41 \pm 0.06$ pb. Quality Cuts indicate a set of cuts applied to ensure good quality events in data. A full description of the cuts used is given in the text. The original input file has a filter applied to it that ensures that all the events have either $E_T^{miss}>150$ GeV or at least one electron or muon with $p_\mathrm{T} > 20$ GeV at truth level. After the filter is applied (efficiency = 0.925) there are 50000 events remaining before applying the event weights.

Summary of results for cross-section of non-prompt $J/\psi$ decaying to a muon pair for 8 TeV data in nb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for cross-section of prompt $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair for 7 TeV data in nb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for cross-section of prompt $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair for 8 TeV data in nb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for cross-section of non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair for 7 TeV data in nb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for cross-section of non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair for 8 TeV data in nb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $J/\psi$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 7 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $J/\psi$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 8 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 7 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 8 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 7 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 8 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 7 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 8 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "longitudinal" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "transverse zero" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "transverse positive" spin-alignment transverse positive hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "transverse negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane positive" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "longitudinal" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "transverse zero" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "transverse positive" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "transverse negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane positive" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "longitudinal" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "transverse zero" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "transverse positive" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "transverse negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane positive" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "longitudinal" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "transverse zero" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "transverse positive" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "transverse negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane positive" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Selection efficiency x Acceptance for a spin-0 resonance.

Reconstructed m_tt spectrum for the boosted selections.

Reconstructed m_tt spectrum for the resolved selections.

Reconstructed m_tt spectrum for the all the selections.

Limits on the production cross-section x branching ratio to tt final states as a function of the mass of Z'TC2.

Limits on the production cross-section x branching ratio to tt final states as a function of the mass of bulk RS KK graviton.

Limits on the production cross-section x branching ratio to tt final states as a function of the mass of bulk RS KK gluon.

Limits on the production cross-section x branching ratio to tt final states as a function of the mass of a scalar.

Limits on the production cross-section x branching ratio to tt final states as a function of the width of a 1TeV bulk RS KK gluon.

Limits on the production cross-section x branching ratio to tt final states as a function of the width of a 2TeV bulk RS KK gluon.

Limits on the production cross-section x branching ratio to tt final states as a function of the width of a 3TeV bulk RS KK gluon.

Migration from the true mtt values to the reconstructed mtt values for the resolved selection.

Migration from the true mtt values to the reconstructed mtt values for the boosted selection.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 0.9\ TeV$ events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various multiplicity intervals $n_{ch}$ for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 7\ TeV$ events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various multiplicity intervals $n_{ch}$ for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. The statistical uncertainties at $7\ TeV$ were corrected on the $\sqrt{\chi^{2}/ndf}$ and they more smaller than systematic uncertainties. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 7\ TeV\ HM$ events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various multiplicity intervals $n_{ch}$ for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 0.9\ TeV$ ($n_{ch} \ge 2$) events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various $k_{T}$ intervals for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. The statistical uncertainties were corrected on the $\sqrt{\chi^{2}/ndf}$ when $\chi^{2}/ndf > 1$. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 7\ TeV$ ($n_{ch} \ge 2$) events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various $k_{T}$ intervals for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$ , this represents the statistical uncertainty only. The statistical uncertainties were corrected on the $\sqrt{\chi^{2}/ndf}$ when $\chi^{2}/ndf > 1$. The statistical uncertainties at $7\ TeV$ more smaller than systematic uncertainties.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 7\ TeV\ HM$ ($n_{ch} \ge 150$) events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various $k_{T}$ intervals for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. The statistical uncertainties were corrected on the $\sqrt{\chi^{2}/ndf}$ when $\chi^{2}/ndf > 1$.Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 7\ TeV$ events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various $k_{T}$ intervals of different multiplicity regions $n_{ch}$ for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The statistical uncertainties were corrected on the $\sqrt{\chi^{2}/ndf}$ when $\chi^{2}/ndf > 1$. The statistical uncertainties smaller than systematic uncertainties. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The $Q$ distribution measured at $0.9\ TeV$ for unlike-sign pairs for $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$, renormalized to the total number of charged-particle pairs. The error bars represents the statistical uncertainties.

The $Q$ distribution measured at $0.9\ TeV$ for like-sign pairs for $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$, renormalized to the total number of charged-particle pairs. The error bars represents the statistical uncertainties.

The $Q$ distribution measured at $7\ TeV$ for unlike-sign pairs for $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$, renormalized to the total number of charged-particle pairs. The error bars represents the statistical uncertainties.

The $Q$ distribution measured at $7\ TeV$ for like-sign pairs for $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$, renormalized to the total number of charged-particle pairs. The error bars represents the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $0.9\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $n_{ch}$ intervals $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $0.9\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals with multiplicity $n_{ch} \ge 2$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different multiplicity intervals $n_{ch}$ with $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta| < 2.5$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals with multiplicity $n_{ch} \ge 2$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV\ HM$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $n_{ch}$ intervals $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured with $7\ TeV\ HM$ data using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals with multiplicity $n_{ch} \ge 150$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals within multiplicity interval $n_{ch} = 2-9$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals within multiplicity interval $n_{ch} = 10-24$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals within multiplicity interval $n_{ch} = 25-80$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals within multiplicity interval $n_{ch} = 81-125$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

Normalised fiducial ttbar differential cross-section for the jet pull angle distribution constructed using all particles. No uncertainty due to a potential non-SM colour flow model is included. These data should be taken as the 'default' all-particles pull angle data and uncertainties.

Normalised fiducial ttbar differential cross-section for the jet pull angle distribution constructed using charged particles. No uncertainty due to a potential non-SM colour flow model is included. These data should be taken as the 'default' charged-particles pull angle data and uncertainties.

Statistical+Systematic bin-bin correlation matrix.

Measured three-jet double-differential cross sections as a function of M(3JET) in 6<=|Y*|<8 for anti-kt R=0.4 jets. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured three-jet double-differential cross sections as a function of M(3JET) in 8<=|Y*|<10 for anti-kt R=0.4 jets. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured three-jet double-differential cross sections as a function of M(3JET) in |Y*|<2 for anti-kt R=0.6 jets. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured three-jet double-differential cross sections as a function of M(3JET) in 2<=|Y*|<4 for anti-kt R=0.6 jets. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured three-jet double-differential cross sections as a function of M(3JET) in 4<=|Y*|<6 for anti-kt R=0.6 jets. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured three-jet double-differential cross sections as a function of M(3JET) in 6<=|Y*|<8 for anti-kt R=0.6 jets. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured three-jet double-differential cross sections as a function of M(3JET) in 8<=|Y*|<10 for anti-kt R=0.6 jets. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +0.3 < eta^dijet < +0.8.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -0.3 < eta^dijet < +0.3.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -0.8 < eta^dijet < -0.3.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -1.2 < eta^dijet < -0.8.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -2.1 < eta^dijet < -1.2.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -2.8 < eta^dijet < -2.1.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +2.1 < eta^dijet < +2.8.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +1.2 < eta^dijet < +2.1.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +0.8 < eta^dijet < +1.2.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for +0.3 < eta^dijet < +0.8.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -0.3 < eta^dijet < +0.3.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -0.8 < eta^dijet < -0.3.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -1.2 < eta^dijet < -0.8.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -2.1 < eta^dijet < -1.2.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of dijet pT^avg, shown here for -2.8 < eta^dijet < -2.1.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-3 < x_targ < 10^-2.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-2 < x_targ < 10^-1.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-1 < x_targ < 1$.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-3 < x_targ < 1$.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-3 < x_proj < 10^-2.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-2 < x_proj < 10^-1.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-1 < x_proj < 1$.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, <SumET>. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-3 < x_proj < 1$.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-3 < x_targ < 10^-2.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-2 < x_targ < 10^-1.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-1 < x_targ < 1$.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_proj, shown here for 10^-3 < x_targ < 1$.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-3 < x_proj < 10^-2.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-2 < x_proj < 10^-1.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-1 < x_proj < 1$.

Mean value of the sum of the transverse energy in -4.9 < eta < -3.2 in pp collisions, divided by a reference value (see text), <SumET>/<SumET>^ref. Reported as a function of x_targ, shown here for 10^-3 < x_proj < 1$.

The fiducial, inclusive (SPS+DPS) and DPS-subtracted differential cross-section ratio $\mathrm{d}R_{Z+J/\psi}/\mathrm{d}y$ as a function of $y_{J/\psi}$ for non-prompt $J/\psi$.

The inclusive (SPS+DPS) cross-section ratio $\mathrm{d}R_{Z+J/\psi}^\mathrm{incl}/\mathrm{d}p_\mathrm{T}$ for prompt and non-prompt $J/\psi$. Estimated DPS contributions for each bin, based on the assumptions made in this study, are presented.

The inclusive (SPS+DPS) cross-section ratio $\mathrm{d}R_{Z+J/\psi}^\mathrm{incl}/\mathrm{d}p_\mathrm{T}$ for prompt and non-prompt $J/\psi$. Estimated DPS contributions for each bin, based on the assumptions made in this study, are presented.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE0 LJs as a function of $L_{\mathrm{xy}}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to \mu\mu$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.4 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE0 LJs as a function of $L_{\mathrm{xy}}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to \mu\mu$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.9 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE0 LJs as a function of $L_{\mathrm{xy}}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to \mu\mu$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 1.5 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE2 LJs as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.05 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE2 LJs as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.15 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE2 LJs as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.4 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE2 LJs as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.9 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE2 LJs as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 1.5 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE2 LJs as a function of $L_{\mathrm{xy}}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.05 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE2 LJs as a function of $L_{\mathrm{xy}}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.15 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE2 LJs as a function of $L_{\mathrm{xy}}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.4 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE2 LJs as a function of $L_{\mathrm{xy}}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.9 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE2 LJs as a function of $L_{\mathrm{xy}}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 1.5 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE0 LJs as a function of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the $s_{d_{1}}$ for LJs with two $\gamma_{d}$'s for an \scalar mass of 2 GeV. For the $\gamma_{d}$, the kinematically allowed mass of 0.4 GeV is considered. The distributions for the other $s_{d_{1}}$ masses are very similar. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE0 LJs as a function of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the $s_{d_{1}}$ for LJs with two $\gamma_{d}$'s for an \scalar mass of 2 GeV. For the $\gamma_{d}$, the kinematically allowed mass of 0.9 GeV is considered. The distributions for the other $s_{d_{1}}$ masses are very similar. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE1 LJs as a function of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the $s_{d_{1}}$ for LJs with two $\gamma_{d}$'s for an \scalar mass of 2 GeV. For the $\gamma_{d}$, the kinematically allowed mass of 0.4 GeV is considered. The distributions for the other $s_{d_{1}}$ masses are very similar. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE1 LJs as a function of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the $s_{d_{1}}$ for LJs with two $\gamma_{d}$'s for an \scalar mass of 2 GeV. For the $\gamma_{d}$, the kinematically allowed mass of 0.9 GeV is considered. The distributions for the other $s_{d_{1}}$ masses are very similar. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE2 LJs as a function of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the $s_{d_{1}}$ for LJs with two $\gamma_{d}$'s for an \scalar mass of 2 GeV. For the $\gamma_{d}$, the kinematically allowed mass of 0.05 GeV is considered. The distributions for the other $s_{d_{1}}$ masses are very similar. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE2 LJs as a function of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the $s_{d_{1}}$ for LJs with two $\gamma_{d}$'s for an \scalar mass of 2 GeV. For the $\gamma_{d}$, the kinematically allowed mass of 0.15 GeV is considered. The distributions for the other $s_{d_{1}}$ masses are very similar. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE2 LJs as a function of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the $s_{d_{1}}$ for LJs with two $\gamma_{d}$'s for an \scalar mass of 2 GeV. For the $\gamma_{d}$, the kinematically allowed mass of 0.4 GeV is considered. The distributions for the other $s_{d_{1}}$ masses are very similar. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Reconstruction efficiency of TYPE2 LJs as a function of the $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ of the $s_{d_{1}}$ for LJs with two $\gamma_{d}$'s for an \scalar mass of 2 GeV. For the $\gamma_{d}$, the kinematically allowed mass of 0.9 GeV is considered. The distributions for the other $s_{d_{1}}$ masses are very similar. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Muon trigger efficiency, $\rm \varepsilon$(2mu6), as a function of $p_{T}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to \mu\mu$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.4 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Muon trigger efficiency, $\rm \varepsilon$(2mu6), as a function of $p_{T}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to \mu\mu$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.9 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Muon trigger efficiency, $\rm \varepsilon$(2mu6), as a function of $p_{T}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to \mu\mu$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 1.5 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Muon trigger efficiency, $\rm \varepsilon$(2mu6), as a function of $\eta$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to \mu\mu$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.4 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Muon trigger efficiency, $\rm \varepsilon$(2mu6), as a function of $\eta$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to \mu\mu$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.9 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Muon trigger efficiency, $\rm \varepsilon$(2mu6), as a function of $\eta$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to \mu\mu$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 1.5 GeV. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Calorimetric trigger efficiency as a function of $p_{T}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.05 GeV. Similar distributions are obtained for LJs containing two dark photons. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Calorimetric trigger efficiency as a function of $p_{T}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.15 GeV. Similar distributions are obtained for LJs containing two dark photons. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Calorimetric trigger efficiency as a function of $p_{T}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.4 GeV. Similar distributions are obtained for LJs containing two dark photons. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Calorimetric trigger efficiency as a function of $p_{T}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.9 GeV. Similar distributions are obtained for LJs containing two dark photons. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Calorimetric trigger efficiency as a function of $p_{T}$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 1.5 GeV. Similar distributions are obtained for LJs containing two dark photons. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Calorimetric trigger efficiency as a function of $\eta$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.05 GeV. Similar distributions are obtained for LJs containing two dark photons. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Calorimetric trigger efficiency as a function of $\eta$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.15 GeV. Similar distributions are obtained for LJs containing two dark photons. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Calorimetric trigger efficiency as a function of $\eta$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.4 GeV. Similar distributions are obtained for LJs containing two dark photons. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Calorimetric trigger efficiency as a function of $\eta$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 0.9 GeV. Similar distributions are obtained for LJs containing two dark photons. The uncertainties are statistical only.

Calorimetric trigger efficiency as a function of $\eta$ of the $\gamma_{d}$ for $\gamma_{d} \to ee,\pi\pi$ obtained from the LJ gun MC samples with $\gamma_{d}$ masses 1.5 GeV. Similar distributions are obtained for LJs containing two dark photons. The uncertainties are statistical only.