Transverse region charged particle <pT> as a function of the leading jet pT for pT>0.2 GeV/c (open symbols) and pT>0.5 GeV/c (filled symbols). Simulations are also shown as curves. The wide curves are PYTHIA 6 (STAR). The middle width curves are default PYTHIA 6 Perugia 2012 tune. The thin curves are PYTHIA 8 Monash 2013 tune.

Detector-level average charged particle multiplicity densities for TransMax and TransMin as functions of the leading jet pT. Points are measured data. Histograms are calculated values assuming TransMax and TransMin are derived from the same parent distribution.

Transverse charged particle densities at various center-of-mass collision energies. Uncertainties smaller than the marker sizes.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.

Inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).

The strong coupling extracted from the normalised inclusive jet, dijet and trijet data at NLO as a function of the renormalisation scale $\mu_r$. For each $\mu_r$ the values of the strong coupling $\alpha_s(\mu_r)$ and the equivalent values $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ are given with experimental (exp) and theoretical (th) uncertainties.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransDIF region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 1.96 TeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMAX region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 1.96 TeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMIN region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 1.96 TeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransAVE region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 1.96 TeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransDIF region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 1.96 TeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMAX region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMIN region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransAVE region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransDIF region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMAX region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMIN region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransAVE region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransDIF region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 900 GeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMAX region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMIN region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransAVE region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

Average charged particle multiplicity for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransDIF region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMAX region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransMIN region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransAVE region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

Average charged particle pT sum for charged particles with pT > 0.5 GeV and |eta| < 0.8 in the TransDIF region as defined by the leading charged particle, as a function of the transverse momentum of the leading charged-particle pTmax, at 300 GeV.

$\rm dN_{ch}/dy$ versus y distribution derived from the $\rm dN_{ch}/d\eta$ distribution along with pt distributions and particle ratios measured in ALICE. Errors are systematic.

The ratio of the standard deviation of the rapidity distribution of charged particles to that expected from Landau hydrodynamics versus versus $\sqrt{s}$/nucleon-pair. The standard deviation for data for all charged particles is derived from the $\rm dN_{ch}/d\eta$ distributions measured at various energies and converted to $\rm dN_{ch}/dy$ in a consistent manner. The data from the BRAHMS and PHOBOS experiments derived by the present authors from these experiments $dN/d\eta$ distributions.

Differential cross section DSIG/DX for the two values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam.

Differential cross section DSIG/DY for the two values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DQ**2 with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DX with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DY with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DQ**2 with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DX with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the differential cross section DSIG/DY with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlation between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 280 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 530 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 950 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 1700 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 3000 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 5300 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 9500 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 17000 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section for 3 values of longitudinal polarization of the electron beam for Q**2 = 30000 GeV**2.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Values of the reduced cross section with detailed statistical and systematic errors.. The first DSYS is the uncorrelated systematic error and the second is the calorimeter energy scale uncertainty which has significant correlationS between cross section bins.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 32 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.23.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 38 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.23.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 19 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.28.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 23 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.28.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 28 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.28.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 32 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.28.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 38 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.28.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 19 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.34.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 23 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.34.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 28 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.34.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 32 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.34.

Distribution of multiplicity of charged particles in a jet as a function of LN(1/X) for mean jet energy 38 GeV and jet cone opening angle 0.34.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 318.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 318.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 318.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 251.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

The reduced cross section at Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centre-of-mass energy 225.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 at Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 with no constraints on FL or F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and F2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2.

FL and R as a function of Q**2 with no constraints on F2 or FL. The quantites are quoted such that Q**2/X is constant for each value which correspinds to Y = 0.71 at Ecm=225 GeV.

FL and R as a function of Q**2 with the additional constraints that F2 >= 0 and 0 <= FL <= F2. The quantites are quoted such that Q**2/X is constant for each value which correspinds to Y = 0.71 at Ecm=225 GeV.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 318.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 251.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 24 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 32 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 45 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 60 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 80 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Percentage contributions of the various sources of systematic error for Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 for centrof-mass energy 225.

Measured D+- cross section as a function of X.

Measured D+- cross section as a function of the transverse momentum of the D meson.

Measured D+- cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity of the D meson.

Measured D0/DBAR0 cross section as a function of Q**2.

Measured D0/DBAR0 cross section as a function of X.

Measured D0/DBAR0 cross section as a function of the transverse momentum of the D meson.

Measured D0/DBAR0 cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity of the D meson.

Measured cross section for D+- mesons in Q**2 and Y bins.

Measured cross section for D0/DBAR0 mesons in Q**2 and Y bins.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D0/DBAR0 mesons not coming from D*+- decays.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D0/DBAR0 mesons not coming from D*+- decays.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The extracted values of the F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D0/DBAR0 mesons not coming from D*+- decays.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.

The combined F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- and D0/DBAR0 mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.. The additional error from the branching ratio is 3.3 PCT.

The combined F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- and D0/DBAR0 mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.. The additional error from the branching ratio is 3.3 PCT.

The combined F2(NAME=CHARM) structure function from the production cross section of D+- and D0/DBAR0 mesons.. The second systematic error is from the extrapolation to the full phase space.. The additional error from the branching ratio is 3.3 PCT.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.50 TO 0.56. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.56 TO 0.62. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.62 TO 0.65. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.65 TO 0.68. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.68 TO 0.71. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.71 TO 0.74. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.74 TO 0.77. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.77 TO 0.80. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.80 TO 0.83. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.83 TO 0.86. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.86 TO 0.89. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.89 TO 0.92. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.92 TO 0.95. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.95 TO 0.98. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Double differential cross sections as a funtion of PT**2 for the XL range 0.98 TO 1.00. The methods S123 and S456 are the results using different stations of the silicon microstrip detectors.

Leading proton production rate as a funtion of XL in 3 PT**2 ranges.

Leading proton production rate as a funtion of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 9.6E-5 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.7E-4 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.5E-4 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 6.9E-4 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.46E-3 and mean Q**2 of 4.2 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.9E-4 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.4E-4 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 6.9E-4 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.36E-3 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 2.67E-3 and mean Q**2 of 7.3 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 2.6E-4 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 4.6E-4 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 9.2E-4 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.83E-3 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.98E-3 and mean Q**2 of 11 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 5.1E-4 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 9.2E-4 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.84E-3 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.66E-3 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.83E-3 and mean Q**2 of 22 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.03E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.86E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.68E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.33E-3 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.54E-2 and mean Q**2 of 44 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 2.00E-3 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.59E-3 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.37E-3 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.42E-2 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.01E-2 and mean Q**2 of 88 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 4.00E-3 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 7.52E-3 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 1.47E-2 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for the PT**2 region < 0.5 GeV**2, a mean X of 3.25E-2 and mean Q**2 of 237 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.04 to 0.15 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of XL for protons with PT**2 in the range 0.15 to 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate as a function of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production rate, averaged over X, as a function of Q**2 for protons with PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2 in two XL ranges.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Leading proton production structure function F2(C=Lp) as a fujnction of X in Q**2 bins for protons with XL in the range 0.32 to 0.92 and PT**2 < 0.5 GeV**2.

Differential cross sections as a function of X(C=GAMMA) from beauty and charm quarks.

Differential cross sections for the most energetic jet as a function of ET from beauty and charm quarks.

Differential cross sections for the most energetic jet as a function of ET from beauty and charm quarks.

Differential cross sections as a function of the electron ET for the jet associated to the electron from beauty or charm decays.