Allport, P.P.
Cross Section
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 4 of 284 results

Charm Quark Production and Fragmentation in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at 29-{GeV}

Derrick, M. ; Fernandez, E. ; Fries, R. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 146 (1984) 261-265, 1984.
Inspire Record 202898 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.51261

The electroweak production asymmetry and the decay fragmentation function for e + e − → c c have been measured at s = 29 GeV using charged D ∗ production over the full kinematic range. The data were taken at PEP using the High Resolution Spectrometer. The measured asymmetry is −0.12 ± 0.08. The total production cross section in units of the point cross section corrected for initial state radiation is R D ∗ = 2.7 ± 0.9 .

2 data tables
Table 1

ASSUMES SIG(D*+) = SIG(D*0). (EXPT. MEASURES D*+ PRODUCTION ONLY). R VALUE CORRECTED FOR INITIAL STATE RADIATION.

Table 2

No description provided.


Tests of QED at 29-GeV Center-Of-Mass Energy

Bender, D. ; Derrick, M. ; Fernandez, E. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 30 (1984) 515, 1984.
Inspire Record 199464 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.23593

During the initial data run with the High Resolution Spectrometer (HRS) at SLAC PEP, an integrated luminosity of 19.6 pb−1 at a center-of-mass energy of 29 GeV was accumulated. The data on Bhabha scattering and muon pair production are compared with the predictions of QED and the standard model of electroweak interactions. The measured forward-backward charge asymmetry in the angular distribution of muon pairs is -8.4%±4.3%. A comparison between the data and theoretical predictions places limits on alternative descriptions of leptons and their interactions. The existence of heavy electronlike or photonlike objects that alter the structure of the QED vertices or modify the propagator are studied in terms of the QED cutoff parameters. The Bhabha-scattering results give a lower limit on a massive photon and upper limits on the effective size of the electron of Λ+>121 GeV and Λ−>118 GeV at the 95% confidence level. Muon pair production yields Λ+>172 GeV and Λ−>172 GeV. If electrons have substructure, the magnitude and character of the couplings of the leptonic constituents affects the Bhabha-scattering angular distributions to such an extent that limits on the order of a TeV can be extracted on the effective interaction length of the components. For models in which the constituents interact with vector couplings of strength g24π∼1, the energy scale ΛVV for the contact interaction is measured to be greater than 1419.0 GeV at the 95% confidence level. We set limits on the production of supersymmetric scalar electrons through s-channel single-photon annihilation and t-channel inelastic scattering. Using events with two noncollinear electrons and no other charged or observed neutral particles in the final state, we see one event which is consistent with a simple supersymmetric model but which is also consistent with QED. This allows us to exclude the scalar electron to 95% confidence level in the mass range 1.8 to 14.2 GeV/c2.

3 data tables
Table 1

Comparison of Bhabhas with QED.

Table 2

Muon angular distributions.

Table 3

Forward-backward asymmetry from full angular range.


PROPERTIES OF D* PRODUCTION IN e+ e- ANNIHILATION AT 29-GeV

The HRS collaboration Ahlen, S.P. ; Akerlof, C. ; Baranko, G. ; et al.
HRS-CP-83-3, 1983.
Inspire Record 192098 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.13343

None

2 data tables
Table 1

D* FRAGMENTATION FUNCTION.

Table 2

R VALUE IS RADIATIVELY CORRECTED (BUT NOT CROSS SECTION).


Inclusive $D$ and $D^*$ Production in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at 29-{GeV}

The HRS collaboration Ahlen, S.P. ; Akerlof, C. ; Baranko, G. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 51 (1983) 1147, 1983.
Inspire Record 191536 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20523

Inclusive production of (D0, D¯0) and D± mesons have been observed in e+e− annihilation at 29 GeV. The signals correspond to R values of R(D0+D¯0)=3.25±1.2 and R(D++D−)=1.35±0.6. D*± production is also observed via the process D*+→D0π+ and its charge conjugate. The D and D* production rates are compared.

7 data tables
Table 1

EXTRAPOLATION TO ALL Z.

Table 2

EXTRAPOLATION TO ALL Z.

Table 3

EXTRAPOLATION TO ALL Z.

More…