Prompt D0 meson v3 in 0-10 centrality percentile in midrapidity (|y| < 1.0) in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV. The second sys is the systematic uncertainty from the nonprompt D0. The first sys is the systematic uncertainty from other sources.

Prompt D0 meson v3 in 10-30 centrality percentile in midrapidity (|y| < 1.0) in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV. The second sys is the systematic uncertainty from the nonprompt D0. The first sys is the systematic uncertainty from other sources.

Prompt D0 meson v3 in 30-50 centrality percentile in midrapidity (|y| < 1.0) in PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV. The second sys is the systematic uncertainty from the nonprompt D0. The first sys is the systematic uncertainty from other sources.

95% CL upper limits on the product of the production cross section $\sigma(pp\to N_\mu)$ and the branching ratio $B(N_\mu\to \mu q\bar{q}^{\prime})$ in electron channel, compared with theoretical predictions for HCMN model calculated with CalcHEP.

The 95% CL exclusion curve in the parameters' space, obtained in the analysis of the electron channel.

The 95% CL exclusion curve in the parameters' space, obtained in the analysis of the muon channel.

Observed and expected likelihood scans $f_{\Lambda1}^{Z\gamma}\cos\phi_{\Lambda1}^{Z\gamma}$. See Section 2 of the paper for more details.

The observed distribution of the dijet invariant mass in the $\ell$+jets decay channel in the 0 b tagged jet category. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties. The integral in the $\rm{e}$($\mu$)+jets channel (including overflow events) is 1375 (2406).

The observed distribution of the dijet invariant mass in the $\ell$+jets decay channel in the 1 b tagged jet category. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties. The integral in the $\rm{e}$($\mu$)+jets channel (including overflow events) is 61 (129).

The observed distribution of the dijet invariant mass in the $\ell$+jets decay channel in the $\geq$2 b tagged jet category. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties. The integral in the $\rm{e}$($\mu$)+jets channel (including overflow events) is 19 (33).

The observed distribution of the the minimum angular distance $\Delta R$ between all pairs of jets $j$ and $j'$ in the $\ell$+jets decay channel in the 0 b tagged jet category. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties. The integral in the $\rm{e}$($\mu$)+jets channel (including overflow events) is 1375 (2406).

The observed distribution of the the minimum angular distance $\Delta R$ between all pairs of jets $j$ and $j'$ in the $\ell$+jets decay channel in the 1 b tagged jet category. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties. The integral in the $\rm{e}$($\mu$)+jets channel (including overflow events) is 61 (129).

The observed distribution of the the minimum angular distance $\Delta R$ between all pairs of jets $j$ and $j'$ in the $\ell$+jets decay channel in the $\geq$2 b tagged jet category. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties. The integral in the $\rm{e}$($\mu$)+jets channel (including overflow events) is 19 (33).

The observed distribution of the jet multiplicity in the $\rm{e}^\pm \mu^\mp$ decay channel for events passing the dilepton criteria. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties. The last bin of the distributions contains the overflow events.

The observed distribution of the scalar $p_{\rm{T}}$ sum of all jets in the $\rm{e}^\pm \mu^\mp$ decay channel for events passing the dilepton criteria. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties. The last bin of the distributions contains the overflow events.

The observed distribution of the invariant mass of the lepton pair in the $\rm{e}^\pm \mu^\mp$ decay channel after requiring at least two jets. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties. The integral is 24. The last bin of the distributions contains the overflow events.

The observed distribution of the $p_{\rm{T}}$ of the lepton pair in the $\rm{e}^\pm \mu^\mp$ decay channel after requiring at least two jets. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties. The integral is 24. The last bin of the distributions contains the overflow events.

The observed distribution of the $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{miss}}$ in the $\mu^\pm \mu^\mp$ decay channel for events passing the dilepton criteria and Z boson veto. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties. The last bin of the distributions contains the overflow events.

The observed distribution of the invariant mass of the lepton pair in the $\mu^\pm \mu^\mp$ decay channel for events passing the dilepton criteria, Z boson veto, and $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{miss}}>35$ GeV requirement. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties. The last bin of the distributions contains the overflow events.

Comparison between data and MC simulation in the dimuon control samples before and after performing the simultaneous fit across all the control samples and the signal region assuming the absence of any signal. Plot correspond to the mono-V category. The hadronic recoil $p_{T}$ in dilepton events is used as a proxy for $p_{T}^{miss}$ in the signal region. The leading contribution is represented by Z+jets production. The other backgrounds include top quark, diboson, and W+jets processes.

Comparison between data and MC simulation in the dielectron control samples before and after performing the simultaneous fit across all the control samples and the signal region assuming the absence of any signal. Plot correspond to the monojet category. The hadronic recoil $p_{T}$ in dilepton events is used as a proxy for $p_{T}^{miss}$ in the signal region. The leading contribution is represented by Z+jets production. The other backgrounds include top quark, diboson, and W+jets processes.

Comparison between data and MC simulation in the dielectron control samples before and after performing the simultaneous fit across all the control samples and the signal region assuming the absence of any signal. Plot correspond to the mono-V category. The hadronic recoil $p_{T}$ in dilepton events is used as a proxy for $p_{T}^{miss}$ in the signal region. The leading contribution is represented by Z+jets production. The other backgrounds include top quark, diboson, and W+jets processes.

Comparison between data and MC simulation in the single-muon control samples before and after performing the simultaneous fit across all the control samples and the signal region assuming the absence of any signal. Plot correspond to the monojet category. The hadronic recoil $p_{T}$ in dilepton events is used as a proxy for $p_{T}^{miss}$ in the signal region. The leading contribution is represented by W+jets production. The other backgrounds include top quark, diboson, Z+jets, and QCD multijet processes.

Comparison between data and MC simulation in the single-muon control samples before and after performing the simultaneous fit across all the control samples and the signal region assuming the absence of any signal. Plot correspond to the mono-V category. The hadronic recoil $p_{T}$ in dilepton events is used as a proxy for $p_{T}^{miss}$ in the signal region. The leading contribution is represented by W+jets production. The other backgrounds include top quark, diboson, Z+jets, and QCD multijet processes.

Comparison between data and MC simulation in the single-electron control samples before and after performing the simultaneous fit across all the control samples and the signal region assuming the absence of any signal. Plot correspond to the monojet category. The hadronic recoil $p_{T}$ in dilepton events is used as a proxy for $p_{T}^{miss}$ in the signal region. The leading contribution is represented by Z+jets production. The other backgrounds include top quark, diboson, Z+jets, and QCD multijet processes.

Comparison between data and MC simulation in the single-electron control samples before and after performing the simultaneous fit across all the control samples and the signal region assuming the absence of any signal. Plot correspond to the mono-V category. The hadronic recoil $p_{T}$ in dilepton events is used as a proxy for $p_{T}^{miss}$ in the signal region. The leading contribution is represented by W+jets production. The other backgrounds include top quark, diboson, Z+jets, and QCD multijet processes.

Observed $p_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in the monojet signal region compared with the post-fit background expectations for various SM processes. The last bin includes all events with $p_{T}^{miss} > 1250$ GeV for the monojet category. The expected background distributions are evaluated after performing a combined fit to the data in all the control samples, not including the signal region. Expected signal distribution for a 2 TeV axial-vector mediator, decaying to 1 GeV DM particles, is overlaid.

Observed $p_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in the mono-V signal region compared with the post-fit background expectations for various SM processes. The last bin includes all events with $p_{T}^{miss} > 750$ GeV for the mono-V category. The expected background distributions are evaluated after performing a combined fit to the data in all the control samples, not including the signal region. Expected signal distribution for a 2 TeV axial-vector mediator, decaying to 1 GeV DM particles, is overlaid.

Observed $p_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in the monojet signal region compared with the post-fit background expectations for various SM processes. The last bin includes all events with $p_{T}^{miss} > 1250$ GeV for the monojet category. The expected background distributions are evaluated after performing a combined fit to the data in all the control samples, as well as in the signal region. The fit is performed assuming the absence of any signal. Expected signal distribution for a 2 TeV axial-vector mediator, decaying to 1 GeV DM particles, is overlaid.

Observed $p_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in the mono-V signal region compared with the post-fit background expectations for various SM processes. The last bin includes all events with $p_{T}^{miss} > 750$ GeV for the mono-V category. The expected background distributions are evaluated after performing a combined fit to the data in all the control samples, not including as well as in the signal region. The fit is performed assuming the absence of any signal. Expected signal distribution for a 2 TeV axial-vector mediator, decaying to 1 GeV DM particles, is overlaid.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a vector mediator. N.B.: the granularity in the presented limit values is reduced with respect to the published result.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a vector mediator. N.B.: the granularity in the presented limit values is reduced with respect to the published result.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming an axial-vector mediator. N.B.: the granularity in the presented limit values is reduced with respect to the published result.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming an axial-vector mediator. N.B.: the granularity in the presented limit values is reduced with respect to the published result.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a vector mediator.

Expected exclusion contour at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a vector mediator.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming an axial-vector mediator.

Expected exclusion contour at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming an axial-vector mediator.

Exclusion limits at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ vs $m_{med}$ for $m_{DM} = 1$ GeV assuming a scalar mediator.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a pseudoscalar mediator. N.B.: the granularity in the presented limit values is reduced with respect to the published result.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a pseudoscalar mediator. N.B.: the granularity in the presented limit values is reduced with respect to the published result.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a pseudoscalar mediator.

Expected exclusion contour at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a pseudoscalar mediator.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $g_{q}-m_{med}$ plane assuming a vector mediator.

Exclusion exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $g_{q}-m_{med}$ plane assuming a vector mediator.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $g_{q}-m_{med}$ plane assuming an axial-vector mediator.

Exclusion exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $g_{q}-m_{med}$ plane assuming an axial-vector mediator.

Observed upper limits at 90% CL on $\sigma_{DM-nucleon}$ vs $m_{med}$ for vector mediator

Expected upper limits at 90% CL on $\sigma_{DM-nucleon}$ vs $m_{med}$ for vector mediator

Observed upper limits at 90% CL on $\sigma_{DM-nucleon}$ vs $m_{med}$ for axial-vector mediator

Expected upper limits at 90% CL on $\sigma_{DM-nucleon}$ vs $m_{med}$ for axial-vector mediator

Observed upper limits at 90% CL on velocity averaged DM annihilation cross section derived from those placed for pseudoscalar mediators.

Expected upper limits at 90% CL on velocity averaged DM annihilation cross section derived from those placed for pseudoscalar mediators.

Correlations between the predicted background yields in all the $p_{T}^{miss}$ bins of the monojet signal region.

Correlations between the predicted background yields in all the $p_{T}^{miss}$ bins of the mono-V signal region.

The $p_T ^{miss}$ distributions for muon channel comparing the data and background model with systematic uncertainty.

The $m_T$ distributions for electron channel comparing the data and background model with systematic uncertainty, after fitting the background-only model to the data.

The $m_T$ distributions for muon channel comparing the data and background model with systematic uncertainty, after fitting the background-only model to the data.

Expected and observed limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction of a new spin-2 heavy resonance X$\rightarrow$ZZ, assuming zero width, based on the combined analysis of the electron and muon channels.

Expected and observed limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction of a new spin-2 heavy resonance X$\rightarrow$ZZ, assuming zero width, based on the combined analysis of the electron channels.

Expected and observed limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction of a new spin-2 heavy resonance X$\rightarrow$ZZ, assuming zero width, based on the combined analysis of the muon channels.

Expected and observed limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction of a new spin-2 heavy resonance X$\rightarrow$ZZ based on a combined analysis of the electron and muon channels. The more generic version of the bulk graviton model takes 0/10%/20%/30% mass width of the resonance into consideration, assuming gluon-gluon fusion production.

Expected and observed limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction of a new spin-2 heavy resonance X$\rightarrow$ZZ based on a combined analysis of the electron and muon channels. The more generic version of the bulk graviton model takes 0/10%/20%/30% mass width of the resonance into consideration, assuming qq annihilation production.

Normalized dijet angular distribution for events with 4.2 < dijet mass < 4.8 TeV.

Normalized dijet angular distribution for events with 3.6 < dijet mass < 4.2 TeV.

Normalized dijet angular distribution for events with 3.0 < dijet mass < 3.6 TeV.

Normalized dijet angular distribution for events with 2.4 < dijet mass < 3.0 TeV.

The 95% CL upper limits on the quark coupling gq, as a function of mass, for an axialvector or vector DM mediator with gDM = 1.0 and mDM = 1 GeV.

Electroweak correction factors for events with dijet mass > 6.0 TeV computed by the authors of JHEP 11 (2012) 095 (arXiv:1210.0438).

Electroweak correction factors for events with 5.4 < dijet mass < 6.0 TeV computed by the authors of JHEP 11 (2012) 095 (arXiv:1210.0438).

Electroweak correction factors for events with 4.8 < dijet mass < 5.4 TeV computed by the authors of JHEP 11 (2012) 095 (arXiv:1210.0438).

Electroweak correction factors for events with 4.2 < dijet mass < 4.8 TeV computed by the authors of JHEP 11 (2012) 095 (arXiv:1210.0438).

Electroweak correction factors for events with 3.6 < dijet mass < 4.2 TeV computed by the authors of JHEP 11 (2012) 095 (arXiv:1210.0438).

Electroweak correction factors for events with 3.0 < dijet mass < 3.6 TeV computed by the authors of JHEP 11 (2012) 095 (arXiv:1210.0438).

Electroweak correction factors for events with 2.4 < dijet mass < 3.0 TeV computed by the authors of JHEP 11 (2012) 095 (arXiv:1210.0438).

Covariance matrix for 1 < CHI < 2.

Covariance matrix for 2 < CHI < 3.

Covariance matrix for 3 < CHI < 4.

Covariance matrix for 4 < CHI < 5.

Covariance matrix for 5 < CHI < 6.

Covariance matrix for 6 < CHI < 7.

Covariance matrix for 7 < CHI < 8.

Covariance matrix for 8 < CHI < 9.

Covariance matrix for 9 < CHI < 10.

Covariance matrix for 10 < CHI < 12.

Covariance matrix for 12 < CHI < 14.

Covariance matrix for 14 < CHI < 16.

NLO QCD+EW prediction and benchmark signal predictions for dijet mass > 6.0 TeV.

NLO QCD+EW prediction and benchmark signal predictions for 5.4 < dijet mass < 6.0 TeV.

NLO QCD+EW prediction and benchmark signal predictions for 4.8 < dijet mass < 5.4 TeV.

NLO QCD+EW prediction and benchmark signal predictions for 4.2 < dijet mass < 4.8 TeV.

NLO QCD+EW prediction and benchmark signal predictions for 3.6 < dijet mass < 4.2 TeV.

NLO QCD+EW prediction and benchmark signal predictions for 3.0 < dijet mass < 3.6 TeV.

NLO QCD+EW prediction and benchmark signal predictions for 2.4 < dijet mass < 3.0 TeV.

Profile likelihood test statistic $-2\Delta log L$ scan in data as a function of the Higgs and Z bosons signal strengths $(\mu_{H}, \mu_{Z})$.

68% CL contour as a function of the Higgs and Z bosons signal strengths $(\mu_{H}, \mu_{Z})$.

95\% CL contour as a function of the Higgs and Z bosons signal strengths $(\mu_{H}, \mu_{Z})$.

Scan of the likelihood function for the search in the $\tau\tau$ final state for a single narrow resonance, $\phi$, produced via gluon fusion ($gg\phi$) or in association with b quarks ($bb\phi$). The scan is performed in 40000 points of the ($\sigma(gg\phi)\cdot B(\phi\rightarrow\tau\tau)$, $\sigma(bb\phi)\cdot B(\phi\rightarrow\tau\tau)$) plane. An asimov dataset constructed from the expectation of all backgrounds is tested against a background hypothesis without the SM Higgs boson. For further details and instructions, please have a look into the following README file http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/HIG-17-020/2D-likelihood-scans/README.txt. Selected examples of such a likelihood scan are given in Figure 8 of the paper.

Scan of the likelihood function for the search in the $\tau\tau$ final state for a single narrow resonance, $\phi$, produced via gluon fusion ($gg\phi$) or in association with b quarks ($bb\phi$). The scan is performed in 40000 points of the ($\sigma(gg\phi)\cdot B(\phi\rightarrow\tau\tau)$, $\sigma(bb\phi)\cdot B(\phi\rightarrow\tau\tau)$) plane. The observation in data is tested against a background hypothesis including the SM Higgs boson. For further details and instructions, please have a look into the following README file http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/HIG-17-020/2D-likelihood-scans/README.txt. Selected examples of such a likelihood scan are given in Figure 8 of the paper.

Scan of the likelihood function for the search in the $\tau\tau$ final state for a single narrow resonance, $\phi$, produced via gluon fusion ($gg\phi$) or in association with b quarks ($bb\phi$). The scan is performed in 40000 points of the ($\sigma(gg\phi)\cdot B(\phi\rightarrow\tau\tau)$, $\sigma(bb\phi)\cdot B(\phi\rightarrow\tau\tau)$) plane. The observation in data is tested against a background hypothesis without the SM Higgs boson. For further details and instructions, please have a look into the following README file http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/HIG-17-020/2D-likelihood-scans/README.txt. Selected examples of such a likelihood scan are given in Figure 8 of the paper.

The mjj distribution in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria in the e+e- channel. The various signal hypotheses displayed have been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The mjj distribution in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria in the e^{+/-}mu^{-/+} channel. The various signal hypotheses displayed have been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The mjj distribution in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria in the mu+mu- channel. The various signal hypotheses displayed have been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria, in the e+e− channel. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised resonant DNN output is evaluated at mX=400GeV. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria, in the e+e− channel. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised nonresonant DNN output is evaluated at \kappa_\lambda=1, \kappa_t=1. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria, in the e^{+/-}mu^{-/+} channel. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised resonant DNN output is evaluated at mX=400GeV. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria, in the e^{+/-}mu^{-/+} channel. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised nonresonant DNN output is evaluated at \kappa_\lambda=1, \kappa_t=1. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria, in the mu+mu− channel. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised resonant DNN output is evaluated at mX=400GeV. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events after requiring all selection criteria, in the mu+mu− channel. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised nonresonant DNN output is evaluated at \kappa_\lambda=1, \kappa_t=1. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events, for the e+e- channel, in three different mjj regions. The parameterised resonant DNN output is evaluated at mX=400GeV. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events, for the e+e- channel, in three different mjj regions. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised nonresonant DNN output is evaluated at \kappa_\lambda=1, \kappa_t=1. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events, for the e^{+/-}mu^{-/+} channel, in three different mjj regions. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised resonant DNN output is evaluated at mX=400GeV. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events, for the e^{+/-}mu^{-/+} channel, in three different mjj regions. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised nonresonant DNN output is evaluated at \kappa_\lambda=1, \kappa_t=1. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events, for the mu+mu- channel, in three different mjj regions. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised resonant DNN output is evaluated at mX=400GeV. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

The DNN output distributions in data and simulated events, for the mu+mu- channel, in three different mjj regions. Output values towards 0 are background-like, while output values towards 1 are signal-like. The parameterised nonresonant DNN output is evaluated at \kappa_\lambda=1, \kappa_t=1. The signal hypothesis has been scaled to a cross section of 5 pb for display purposes.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the production cross section for X and branching fraction for X -> HH -> bbVV -> bblnulnu, as a function of mX. These limits are computed using the asymptotic CLs method, combining all channels, for the spin-0 hypothesis.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the production cross section for X and branching fraction for X -> HH -> bbVV -> bblnulnu, as a function of mX. These limits are computed using the asymptotic CLs method, combining all channels, for the spin-2 hypothesis.

expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the Higgs boson pair production cross section and branching fraction for HH -> bbVV -> bblnulnu as a function of kappa_top/kappa_lambda.

Exclusions in the (\kappa_top, \kappa_\lambda) plane. Parameters excluded at 95% CL with the observed data, and expected exclusions and the 68 and 95% bands.

The $\varepsilon_{\text{reco}}$ values as a function of $E_{g}$, for $\tilde{g}$ R-hadrons that stop in the EB or HB, in the MC simulation, for the calorimeter search. The $\varepsilon_{\text{reco}}$ values are plotted for the two-body gluino decay, when $m_{\tilde{g}}$ is 1200 GeV.

The $\varepsilon_{\text{reco}}$ values as a function of $E_{g}$, for $\tilde{g}$ R-hadrons that stop in the EB or HB, in the MC simulation, for the calorimeter search. The $\varepsilon_{\text{reco}}$ values are plotted for the two-body gluino decay, when $m_{\tilde{g}}$ is 1800 GeV.

The $\varepsilon_{\text{reco}}$ values as a function of $E_{t}$, for $\tilde{t}$ R-hadrons that stop in the EB or HB, in the MC simulation, for the calorimeter search. The $\varepsilon_{\text{reco}}$ values are plotted for the two-body top squark decays, when $m_{\tilde{t}}$ is 400 GeV.

The $\varepsilon_{\text{reco}}$ values as a function of $E_{t}$, for $\tilde{t}$ R-hadrons that stop in the EB or HB, in the MC simulation, for the calorimeter search. The $\varepsilon_{\text{reco}}$ values are plotted for the two-body top squark decays, when $m_{\tilde{t}}$ is 600 GeV.

The $\varepsilon_{\text{reco}}$ values as a function of $E_{t}$, for $\tilde{t}$ R-hadrons that stop in the EB or HB, in the MC simulation, for the calorimeter search. The $\varepsilon_{\text{reco}}$ values are plotted for the two-body top squark decays, when $m_{\tilde{t}}$ is 1000 GeV.

The $\varepsilon_{\text{reco}}$ values as a function of $m_{\tilde{g}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}}$, for $\tilde{g}$ R-hadrons that stop in the EB or HB, in the MC simulation, for the calorimeter search. The $\varepsilon_{\text{reco}}$ values are plotted for the three-body gluino decay, when $m_{\tilde{g}}$ is 800 and 1000 GeV.

The $\varepsilon_{\text{reco}}$ values as a function of $m_{\tilde{g}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}}$, for $\tilde{g}$ R-hadrons that stop in the EB or HB, in the MC simulation, for the calorimeter search. The $\varepsilon_{\text{reco}}$ values are plotted for the three-body gluino decay, when $m_{\tilde{g}}$ is 1800 GeV.

The background extrapolation for the muon search. The integral of the fit function to $\Delta t_{DT}$ with the sum of two Gaussian distributions and a Crystal Ball function, for $\Delta t_{DT}$>−20 ns, is plotted as a function of the lower $\Delta t_{RPC}$ selection, for 2015 and 2016 data. The uncertainties correspond to when the fit function parameters are varied by one standard deviation.

The 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}\sigma$ for gluino pair production, using the cloud model of R-hadron interactions, as a function of lifetime, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. We show gluinos that undergo a two-body decay. The discontinuous structure observed between $10^{-7}$ and $10^{-5}$ s is due to the increase of the number of observed events in the search window as the lifetime increases.

The 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}\sigma$ for top squark pair production, using the cloud model of R-hadron interactions, as a function of lifetime, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. We show top squarks that undergo a two-body decay. The discontinuous structure observed between $10^{-7}$ and $10^{-5}$ s is due to the increase of the number of observed events in the search window as the lifetime increases.

The 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}\sigma$ for gluino pair production, using the cloud model of R-hadron interactions, as a function of lifetime, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. We show gluinos that undergo a three-body decay. The discontinuous structure observed between $10^{-7}$ and $10^{-5}$ s is due to the increase of the number of observed events in the search window as the lifetime increases.

The 95% CL upper limits on the gluino mass, using the cloud model of R-hadron interactions, as a function of lifetime, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. We show gluinos that undergo a two-body decay. The discontinuous structure observed between $10^{-7}$ and $10^{-5}$ s is due to the increase of the number of observed events in the search window as the lifetime increases.

The 95% CL upper limits on the top squark mass, using the cloud model of R-hadron interactions, as a function of lifetime, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. We show top squarks that undergo a two-body decay. The discontinuous structure observed between $10^{-7}$ and $10^{-5}$ s is due to the increase of the number of observed events in the search window as the lifetime increases.

The 95% CL upper limits on the gluino mass, using the cloud model of R-hadron interactions, as a function of lifetime, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. We show gluinos that undergo a three-body decay. The discontinuous structure observed between $10^{-7}$ and $10^{-5}$ s is due to the increase of the number of observed events in the search window as the lifetime increases.

The 95% CL upper limits in the neutralino mass vs.~gluino mass plane, for lifetimes between 10 $\mu$s and 1000 s, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. The mostly triangular region shows the excluded observed region. We show gluinos that undergo a two-body decay.

The 95% CL upper limits in the neutralino mass vs.~gluino mass plane, for lifetimes between 10 $\mu$s and 1000 s, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. The mostly triangular region shows the excluded expected region. We show gluinos that undergo a two-body decay.

The 95% CL upper limits in the neutralino mass vs.~gluino mass plane, for lifetimes between 10 $\mu$s and 1000 s, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. The mostly triangular region shows the excluded expected +1 s.d. region. We show gluinos that undergo a two-body decay.

The 95% CL upper limits in the neutralino mass vs.~gluino mass plane, for lifetimes between 10 $\mu$s and 1000 s, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. The mostly triangular region shows the excluded expected -1 s.d. region. We show gluinos that undergo a two-body decay.

The 95% CL upper limits in the neutralino mass vs.~top squark mass plane, for lifetimes between 10 $\mu$s and 1000 s, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. The mostly triangular region shows the excluded observed region. We show top squarks that undergo a two-body decay.

The 95% CL upper limits in the neutralino mass vs.~top squark mass plane, for lifetimes between 10 $\mu$s and 1000 s, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. The mostly triangular region shows the excluded expected region. We show top squarks that undergo a two-body decay.

The 95% CL upper limits in the neutralino mass vs.~top squark mass plane, for lifetimes between 10 $\mu$s and 1000 s, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. The mostly triangular region shows the excluded expected +1 s.d. region. We show top squarks that undergo a two-body decay.

The 95% CL upper limits in the neutralino mass vs.~top squark mass plane, for lifetimes between 10 $\mu$s and 1000 s, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. The mostly triangular region shows the excluded expected -1 s.d. region. We show top squarks that undergo a two-body decay.

The 95% CL upper limits in the neutralino mass vs.~gluino mass plane, for lifetimes between 10 $\mu$s and 1000 s, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. The mostly triangular region shows the excluded observed region. We show gluinos that undergo a three-body decay.

The 95% CL upper limits in the neutralino mass vs.~gluino mass plane, for lifetimes between 10 $\mu$s and 1000 s, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. The mostly triangular region shows the excluded expected region. We show gluinos that undergo a three-body decay.

The 95% CL upper limits in the neutralino mass vs.~gluino mass plane, for lifetimes between 10 $\mu$s and 1000 s, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. The mostly triangular region shows the excluded expected +1 s.d. region. We show gluinos that undergo a three-body decay.

The 95% CL upper limits in the neutralino mass vs.~gluino mass plane, for lifetimes between 10 $\mu$s and 1000 s, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the calorimeter search. The mostly triangular region shows the excluded expected -1 s.d. region. We show gluinos that undergo a three-body decay.

The 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}\sigma$ for 1000 GeV gluino pair production as a function of lifetime, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the muon search.

The 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}\sigma$ for 400 GeV MCHAMP pair production as a function of lifetime, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the muon search.

95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}\sigma$ for gluino pair production as a function of mass, for lifetimes between 10 $\mu$s and 1000 s, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the muon search. The theory curves assume $\mathcal{B}=100\%$.

95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}\sigma$ for MCHAMP pair production as a function of mass, for lifetimes between 10 $\mu$s and 1000 s, for combined 2015 and 2016 data for the muon search. The theory curves assume $\mathcal{B}=100\%$.

Upper limits at the 95% CL for nonresonant HH production with anomalous couplings (shape benchmarks)

Upper limits at the 95% CL for for a spin-0 resonance decaying to HH, compared for the decay channels investigated

Upper limits at the 95% CL for for a spin-0 resonance decaying to HH, compared for the event categories investigated

Upper limits at the 95% CL for nonresonant HH production with anomalous lambda_HHH and yt couplings, compared for the decay channels investigated

Upper limits at the 95% CL for nonresonant HH production with anomalous lambda_HHH and yt couplings, compared for the event categories investigated

The normalized doubly-differential cross section within the fiducial region as a function of the $\phi^*$ (phi*) variable and rapidity

The covariance matrix for the absolute differential cross section within the fiducial region as a function of the $\phi^*$ (phi*) variable

The covariance matrix for the normalized differential cross section within the fiducial region as a function of the $\phi^*$ (phi*) variable

The covariance matrix for the absolute doubly-differential cross section within the fiducial region as a function of the $\phi^*$ (phi*) variable and rapidity

The covariance matrix for the normalized doubly-differential cross section within the fiducial region as a function of the $\phi^*$ (phi*) variable and rapidity

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the universal quark coupling $g_{q}$ as a function of resonance mass for a vector mediator of interactions between quarks and dark matter.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the universal quark coupling $g_{q}'$ as a function of resonance mass for a leptophobic Z' resonance that only couples to quarks.

Figure 3 (upper). Distribution of $M_{T2}(ll)$ in a control region enriched in $t\bar{t}$ events defined by requiring at least 2 jets, at least one of them b-tagged, and missing transverse momentum below 80 GeV. For the plot, simulated yields are normalized to data using the yields in the $M_{T2}(ll)$ < 100 GeV region.

Figure 4 (upper). Expected and observed yields in the five $t\bar{t}Z$ control regions, which are defined by different requirements on the number of reconstructed jets and b jets, before the fit.

Figure 4 (lower). Expected and observed yields in the five $t\bar{t}Z$ control regions, which are defined by different requirements on the number of reconstructed jets and b jets, after the fit.

Figure 5 (left). Distribution of $M_{T2}(ll)$ of SF events falling within in the Z boson mass window with at least two jets and no b jet, $p_{T}^{miss} > 80$ GeV and $M_{T2}(ll) > 100$ GeV.

Figure 5 (center). Distribution of $M_{T2}(blbl)$ of SF events falling within in the Z boson mass window with at least two jets and no b jet, $p_{T}^{miss} > 80$ GeV and $M_{T2}(ll) > 100$ GeV.

Figure 5 (right). Distribution of $p_{T}^{miss}$ of SF events falling within in the Z boson mass window with at least two jets and no b jet, $p_{T}^{miss} > 80$ GeV and $M_{T2}(ll) > 100$ GeV.

Figure 6. Event yields in the 13 Drell-Yan and multiboson control regions for events with SF leptons falling within the Z boson mass window and no b jets, after renormalizing with the scale factors obtained from the fit procedure described in the text.

Figure 7 (left). Distributions of $M_{T2}(ll)$ for observed events in the dimuon channel compared to the predicted SM background.

Figure 7 (center). Distributions of $M_{T2}(ll)$ for observed events in the dielectron channel compared to the predicted SM background.

Figure 7 (right). Distributions of $M_{T2}(ll)$ for observed events in the electron-muon channel compared to the predicted SM background.

Figure 8 (left). Distributions of $M_{T2}(ll)$ for all lepton flavors for the defined selection.

Figure 8 (center). Distributions of $M_{T2}(blbl)$ for all lepton flavors for the defined selection, after requiring $M_{T2}(ll) > 100$ GeV.

Figure 8 (right). Distributions of $p_{T}^{miss}$ for all lepton flavors for the defined selection, after requiring $M_{T2}(ll) > 100$ GeV.

Figure 9 (upper). Predicted backgrounds and observed yields in the dielectron and dimuon search regions. The yields are post fit and correspond to the numbers quoted in Tab. 4 of the publication.

Figure 9 (lower). Predicted backgrounds and observed yields in the electron-muon search regions. The yields are post fit and correspond to the numbers quoted in Tab. 4 of the publication.

Figure 10. Predicted backgrounds and observed yields in all search regions combined. The yields are post fit and correspond to the numbers quoted in Tab. 4 of the publication.

Figure 11 (upper). Observed limits for the T2tt model in the top squark - LSP mass plane. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane.

Figure 11 (upper). Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Figure 11 (upper). Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Figure 11 (lower). Observed limits for the T2bW model in the top squark - LSP mass plane. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane.

Figure 11 (lower). Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Figure 11 (lower). Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Figure 12 (upper left). Observed limits for the T8bbllnunu model in the top squark - LSP mass plane. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.05 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (upper left). Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.05 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (upper left). Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.05 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (upper left). Observed limits for the T8bbllnunu model in the top squark - LSP mass plane. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (upper left). Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (upper left). Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (lower). Observed limits for the T8bbllnunu model in the top squark - LSP mass plane. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.95 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (lower). Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.95 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (lower). Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.95 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 13. Observed limits for the T2tt model in the top squark - LSP mass plane combining the dilepton final state with single-lepton and the all-hadronic final states. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane.

Figure 13. Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Figure 13. Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Figure 14. Observed limits for the T2bW model in the top squark - LSP mass plane combining the dilepton final state with single-lepton and the all-hadronic final states. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane.

Figure 14. Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Figure 14. Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Additional Figure 3. Observed limits for the T2tt model in the top squark - LSP mass plane using aggregate signal regions. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane.

Additional Figure 3. Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Additional Figure 3. Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Table 5. Ratios of $\mu=\frac{\sigma$}{\sigma_{theory}}$ of the 95% CL expected and observed limits to simplified model expectations for different DM particle masses and mediator masses.

Table 6. Expected and observed event yields, summed over all lepton flavors, in aggregate signal regions.

Table 7 (upper). Covariance matrix for the background prediction in aggregate signal regions.

Table 7 (lower). Correlation matrix for the background prediction in aggregate signal regions.

Additional Figure 1. Correlation matrix of the 13 signal regions, split into same-flavor (SF) and different-flavor (DF) regions.

Additional Figure 2. Covariance matrix of the 13 signal regions, split into same-flavor (SF) and different-flavor (DF) regions.

Invariant mass distributions of the $t\to jj^{'}b$ candidates, $m_{top}$, in the 0 b category after all selections. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties.

Invariant mass distributions of the $t\to jj^{'}b$ candidates, $m_{top}$, in the 1 b category after all selections. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties.

Invariant mass distributions of the $t\to jj^{'}b$ candidates, $m_{top}$, in the $\geq$2 b category after all selections. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties.

The measured cross section in the $\mu$+jets, $\rm{e}$+jets and $\ell$+jets channels. The first uncertainty is the statistical, the second is the systematic.

Unfolded distributions of $\Sigma p_{T}$ density in Z events, as a function of $p_{T}^{\mu\mu}$ in the towards ($\Delta\phi< 60^{\circ}$) region. Error bars represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Unfolded distributions of $\Sigma p_{T}$ density in Z events, as a function of $p_{T}^{\mu\mu}$ in the transverse ($60^{\circ} <\Delta\phi< 120^{\circ}$) region. Error bars represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Unfolded distributions of $\Sigma p_{T}$ density in Z events, as a function of $p_{T}^{\mu\mu}$ in the away ($\Delta\phi> 120^{\circ}$) region. Error bars represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Figure 8. Gluino pair production cross section.

Table 1. Post-fit yields for the background-only fit, observed data, and expected yields for mgluino = 1600 GeV in each search bin.

Limit on the signal strength of the DM signal in a simplified model with a scalar mediator.

Limit on the signal strength of the DM signal in a simplified model with a pseudoscalar mediator.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the production cross section and the branching fraction, $\sigma$(qq -> ZH) B(H -> inv.), as a function of the SM-like Higgs boson mass. The limits consider only quark-induced Higgs boson production.

The 95% CL upper limits on the Wilson coefficient $\lambda(1\mathrm{TeV} / \Lambda_{U})^{d_{U}-1}$ of the unparticle-quark coupling operator.

The 95% CL lower limits on the reduced Planck mass $M_{D}$ as a function of the number of extra dimensions $d$.

The covariance matrix of the bin contents of the background fit. Because the matrix is symmetric by definiton, only the upper half is provided here for presentational purposes. The full matrix can be obtained by mirroring the given half along the diagonal.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma_{\mathrm{VBF}}(H^{\pm\pm}) \times \mathrm{{\it B}}(H^{\pm\pm} \to W^{\pm}W^{\pm})$, as a function of doubly charged Higgs boson mass.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $s_H$ in the Georgi--Machacek model as a function of doubly charged Higgs boson mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL limits on the coefficients for higher-order (dimension-eight) operators in the effective field theory Lagrangian.

Main systematic uncertainties in the analysis.

Signal efficiency from the generator level fiducial definition to the reconstruction level selection for the dilepton mass variable.

Observed number of events and pre-fit background predictions in the $7\leq N_{jet}\leq8$ search bins.

Observed number of events and pre-fit background predictions in the $N_{jet}=9$ search bins.

Observed number of events and pre-fit background predictions in the aggregate search regions.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1tttt simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T1tttt simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T1tttt simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1tttt simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T1tttt simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T1tttt simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1tttt simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1tttt simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1bbbb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T1bbbb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T1bbbb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1bbbb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T1bbbb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T1bbbb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1bbbb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1bbbb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1qqqq simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T1qqqq simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T1qqqq simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1qqqq simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T1qqqq simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T1qqqq simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1qqqq simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1qqqq simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T5qqqqVV simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T5qqqqVV simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T5qqqqVV simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T5qqqqVV simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T5qqqqVV simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T5qqqqVV simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T5qqqqVV simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T5qqqqVV simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1tbtb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T1tbtb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T1tbtb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1tbtb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T1tbtb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T1tbtb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1tbtb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T1tbtb simplified models as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T2tt simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T2tt simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T2tt simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T2tt simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T2tt simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T2tt simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T2tt simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T2tt simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T2bb simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T2bb simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T2bb simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T2bb simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T2bb simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T2bb simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T2bb simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T2bb simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T2qq simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T2qq simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T2qq simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T2qq simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections plus uncertainty for the T2qq simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections minus uncertainty for the T2qq simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T2qq simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the production cross sections for the T2qq simplified models as a function of the squark and LSP masses.

Higgs fiducial cross section in bins of pT of leading jet The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the systematic uncertainty. The numbers in this HEP data entry are not divided by the bin width, and therefore the units are in fb. The 0-jet bin is also included here, which is not shown in the Figure.

Correlation matrix for DSIG/DPT(H).

Correlation matrix for DSIG/DN(JETS).

Correlation matrix for DSIG/PT(JET).