The performance of jet energy resolution (JER) for jets with |y| < 2.1 evaluated as a function of pT_truth in different centrality bins. Simulated hard scatter events were overlaid onto events from a dedicated sample of minimum-bias Xe+Xe data. The fit parameters are listed in a sperate table (Extras 1)

The relative magnitude of systematic uncertainties for per-pair normalized xJ distributions in 0-10% Xe+Xe centrality

The relative magnitude of systematic uncertainties for absolutely normalized xJ distributions in 0-10% Xe+Xe centrality

The relative magnitude of systematic uncertainties for rho distributions for leading jets in 0-10% Xe+Xe centrality

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Pb+Pb collisions.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Pb+Pb collisions.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Pb+Pb collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

Parameter a,b, and c from JER fits in Figure 1b.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded inclusive leptonic asymmetry. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ < 500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [500,750] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [750,1000] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [1000,1500] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ > 1500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ < 30 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [30,120] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ > 120 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 200 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [200,300] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [300,400] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 400 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 20 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [20, 70] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 70 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Ratios of $dN_{ch}/d\eta$ distributions measured in different centrality intervals to that in the peripheral (60–90%) centrality interval. The first uncertainty is statistical the second systematic.

Charged-particle pseudorapidity distribution $dN_{ch}/d\eta$ as a function of centrality (related to the $\langle N_{\mathrm{part}} \rangle$ by Table 3) for several $\eta$-regions. The first uncertainty is statistical the second is the systematic uncertianty without centrality determination uncertainty, the third is the centrality determination systematic uncertainty. The centrality determination systematic uncertainty shall not be used in ratios to any quantity determined in the same centrality interval, e.g. for $dN_{ch}/d\eta/(0.5 N_{\mathrm{part}})$ or in ratios of other particle yields. This uncertainty shall be used for comparing to results of other experiments.

Normalized differential cross-sections for the absolute rapidity (|y|) of the ttbar system. The cross-section in each bin is given as the integral of the normalized differential cross-section over the bin width, divided by the bin width. The calculation of the cross-sections in the last bins includes events falling outside of the bin edges, and the normalization is done within the quoted bin width. The full covariance matrice is provided in Table 8 below.

Bin-wise full covariance matrices for the normalized differential cross-sections of the hadronically decaying top-quark PT. The elements of the covariance matrices are in units of TeV$^{-2}$.

Bin-wise full covariance matrices for the normalized differential cross-sections of the mass of the ttbar system. The elements of the covariance matrices are in units of TeV$^{-2}$.

Bin-wise full covariance matrices for the normalized differential cross-sections of the PT of the ttbar system. The elements of the covariance matrices are in units of TeV$^{-2}$.

Bin-wise full covariance matrices for the normalized differential cross-sections of the absolute rapidity (|y|) of the ttbar system.

Transverse $\langle N_\text{ch} / \delta\eta\,\delta\phi \rangle$ vs. $p_T^\text{lead}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-max $\langle N_\text{ch} / \delta\eta\,\delta\phi \rangle$ vs. $p_T^\text{lead}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-min $\langle N_\text{ch} / \delta\eta\,\delta\phi \rangle$ vs. $p_T^\text{lead}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Transverse $\langle \sum E_T^\text{ch+neut} / \delta\eta\,\delta\phi \rangle$ vs. $p_T^\text{lead}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Transverse $\langle \sum E_T^\text{ch+neut} / \delta\eta\,\delta\phi \rangle$ vs. $p_T^\text{lead}$ in $|\eta| < 4.8$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Transverse $\langle \sum p_T^\text{ch} / \sum E_T^\text{ch+neut} \rangle$ vs. $p_T^\text{lead}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Transverse $\langle \text{mean}~p_T^\text{ch} \rangle$ vs. $p_T^\text{lead}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Transverse $\langle \text{mean}~p_T^\text{ch} \rangle$ vs. $N_\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$ in incl jet events.

Transverse $\langle \text{mean}~p_T^\text{ch} \rangle$ vs. $N_\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$ in excl dijet events.

Transverse $\sum p_T^\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} > 20\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-max $\sum p_T^\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} > 20\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-min $\sum p_T^\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} > 20\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Transverse $\sum p_T^\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} \in [20, 60]\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-max $\sum p_T^\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} \in [20, 60]\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-min $\sum p_T^\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} \in [20, 60]\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Transverse $\sum p_T^\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} \in [60,210]\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-max $\sum p_T^\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} \in [60,210]\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-min $\sum p_T^\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} \in [60,210]\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Transverse $\sum p_T^\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} > 210\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-max $\sum p_T^\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} > 210\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-min $\sum p_T^\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} > 210\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Transverse $N_\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} > 20\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-max $N_\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} > 20\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-min $N_\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} > 20\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Transverse $N_\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} \in [20, 60]\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-max $N_\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} \in [20, 60]\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-min $N_\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} \in [20, 60]\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Transverse $N_\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} \in [60,210]\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-max $N_\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} \in [60,210]\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-min $N_\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} \in [60,210]\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Transverse $N_\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} > 210\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-max $N_\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} > 210\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Trans-min $N_\text{ch}$ in $|\eta| < 2.5$, $p_T^\text{lead} > 210\;\text{GeV}$ in incl jet / excl dijet events.

Differential cross-section for non-prompt chi_c2 production, measured in bins of J/psi pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The measurements are not corrected for the branching fractions of the decays chi_c --> J/psi + gamma and J/psi --> mu+ mu-. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Differential cross-section for prompt chi_c1 production, measured in bins of chi_c1 pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The measurements are not corrected for the branching fractions of the decays chi_c --> J/psi + gamma and J/psi --> mu+ mu-. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Differential cross-section for prompt chi_c2 production, measured in bins of chi_c2 pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The measurements are not corrected for the branching fractions of the decays chi_c --> J/psi + gamma and J/psi --> mu+ mu-. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Differential cross-section for non-prompt chi_c1 production, measured in bins of chi_c1 pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The measurements are not corrected for the branching fractions of the decays chi_c --> J/psi + gamma and J/psi --> mu+ mu-. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Differential cross-section for non-prompt chi_c2 production, measured in bins of chi_c2 pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The measurements are not corrected for the branching fractions of the decays chi_c --> J/psi + gamma and J/psi --> mu+ mu-. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Fraction of prompt J/psi produced in feed-down from radiative chi_c decays as a function of J/psi pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown. The spin-alignment envelope assumes that prompt J/psi are produced unpolarised and represents the maximum uncertainty due to the unknown chi_c spin alignment.

Production rate of prompt chi_c2 relative to prompt chi_c1, measured in bins of J/psi pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The ratio is not corrected for the branching fractions of chi_c1 and chi_c2 into J/psi gamma. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Production rate of non-prompt chi_c2 relative to non-prompt chi_c1, measured in bins of J/psi pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The ratio is not corrected for the branching fractions of chi_c1 and chi_c2 into J/psi gamma. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Fraction of chi_c1 produced in b-hadron decays as a function of chi_c1 pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

Fraction of chi_c2 produced in b-hadron decays as a function of chi_c2 pT, assuming unpolarised chi_c production. The uncertainty envelope associated with the unknown chi_c spin alignment is also shown.

The systematic uncertainties for the nominal muon-channel cross-section measurement. Some sources of uncertainty have both correlated and uncorrelated components. Correlated uncertainties arise from the uncertainty in the electroweak background contributions delta(e.w.)_cor, from corrections to the Monte Carlo modelling of the Z/gamma* pT spectra, and from the reconstruction, trigger and isolation efficiency corrections, given by delta(reco)_cor, delta(trig)_cor and delta(iso)_cor respectively. The uncertainty on the multijet and electroweak background cross sections, given by delta(multijet and delta(e.w.), respectively and muon momentum scale uncertainty, delta(pT_scale) are also correlated. Uncorrelated uncertainties are due to corrections for the trigger and isolation efficiencies, given by delta(trig)_unc and delta(iso)_unc respectively. The uncertainty from the muon resolution correction, delta(res), from the size of the signal Monte Carlo sample, delta(MC), and the uncertaintities due to corrections for the reconstruction, delta(reco)_unc, are also uncorrelated. The luminosity uncertainty 1.8% is not included.

The combined Born-level fiducial differential cross section dsigma/dm_ll, statistical delta(stat), total correlated delta(cor), uncorrelated delta(unc), and total delta(total) uncertainties, as well as individual correlated sources delta(cor)_i. The correlated uncertainties are a linear combination of the 13 correlated uncertainties in the nominal muon and electron channels. As the uncertainties on the combined result no longer originate from individual error sources they are numbered 1-13. Also shown is the correction factor used to derive the dressed cross section (D), and the NNLO extrapolation factor (A) used to derive the cross section for the full phase space, along with the uncertainties associated to variations in scale choice delta(A)_scale, and PDF uncertainty delta(A)_pdf_alpha_s. The luminosity uncertainty 1.8% is not included.

The extended muon channel Born-level fiducial differential cross section dsigma/dm_ll, with the statistical delta(stat), systematic delta(syst), and total delta(tot) uncertainties for each invariant mass bin. Also shown is the correction factor used to derive the dressed cross section (D), and the extrapolation factor (A) used to derive the cross section for the full phase space, along with the uncertainties associated to variations in scale delta(A)_scale, and PDF uncertainty delta(A)_pdf_alpha_s. The luminosity uncertainty 3.5% is not included.

The systematic uncertainties for the extended muon channel cross-section measurement in each invariant mass bin. Correlated uncertainties come from the reconstruction, trigger and isolation efficiency corrections, given by delta(reco), delta(trig) and delta(iso) respectively. The uncertainty on the multijet background cross section, delta(multijet) and the uncertainty on the muon momentum scale, delta(pT_scale), are also correlated across bins. Uncorrelated uncertainties are due to the uncertainty from the muon resolution correction, delta(res), and the sample size of the signal Monte Carlo sample, delta(MC). The luminosity uncertainty 3.5% is not included.

Theory predictions for NLO+LLPS and for fixed-order calculations at NLO and NNLO including higher-order electroweak corrections, for the nominal analysis of the differential cross section dsigma/dm_ll as a function of the invariant mass m_ll. The scale uncertainty is defined as the envelope of variations for 0.5< mu_R,mu_F<2.0 for Powheg. For Fewz the scale uncertainty is defined by the variation 0.5<mu_R=mu_F<2.0. The uncertainty labelled as "stat" in the table corresponds to the pdf+alpha_s uncertainty for Fewz or just the pdf uncertainty for Powheg.

Theory predictions for NLO+LLPS and for fixed-order calculations at NLO and NNLO including higher-order electroweak corrections, for the extended analysis of the differential cross section dsigma/dm_ll as a function of the invariant mass m_ll. The scale uncertainty is defined as the envelope of variations for 0.5<mu_R,mu_F<2.0 for Powheg. For Fewz the scale uncertainty is defined by the variation 0.5<mu_R=mu_F<2.0. The uncertainty labelled as "stat" in the table corresponds to the pdf+alpha_s uncertainty for Fewz or just the pdf uncertainty for Powheg.

Higher-order electroweak corrections in nominal analysis, Delta(HOEW), and the correction for the Photon Induced process, Delta(PI), together with its uncertainty derived from the uncertainty of the photon PDF as a function of the dilepton invariant mass m_ll. Also shown is the difference arising from the non-convergence of calculations derived with different electroweak schema, delta(scheme).

Higher-order electroweak corrections in extended analysis, Delta(HOEW), and the correction for the Photon Induced process, Delta(PI), together with its uncertainty derived from the uncertainty of the photon PDF as a function of the dilepton invariant mass m_ll. Also shown is the difference arising from the non-convergence of calculations derived with different electroweak schema, delta(scheme).

Values of chi^2 for the nominal and extended DY cross-section measurements for predictions based from Fewz at NLO and NNLO and Powheg using MSTW2008 PDFs accounting for the experimental correlated systematic uncertainties. The _pdf_scale columns show the chi^2 when the PDF and scale uncertainties on the theoretical predictions are taken into account.

The chi^2 values from NLO and NNLO QCD fits made using the ATLAS nominal and extended Drell--Yan cross-section measurements and the HERA-I dataset accounting for the experimental correlated systematic uncertainties.

Observed 90% C.L. lower limits on the mass scale, M*, of considered effective field theories as a function of mChi. For each operator, the values below the corresponding line are excluded.

Expected 95% C.L. upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction as a function of mChi. For each operator, the values above the corresponding line are excluded.

Observed 95% C.L. upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction as a function of mChi. For each operator, the values above the corresponding line are excluded.