The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K_{S}^{0}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K_{S}^{0}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K_{S}^{0}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K_{S}^{0}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K_{S}^{0}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The triangular flow per constituent quark v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The triangular flow per constituent quark v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in pPb.

The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in pPb.

The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in pPb.

The triangular flow per constituent quark v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in pPb.

The triangular flow per constituent quark v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in pPb.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $Corr_{\gamma\,-ch}^{real}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $Corr_{\gamma\,-ch}^{mixed}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $\omega_{\gamma}^{real}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $\omega_{\gamma}^{mixed}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $v_{dyn}^{real}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $v_{dyn}^{mixed}$ is plotted.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the same side.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the same side.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the away-side.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the away-side.

The correlation between positive and negative charged particles measured by the FTPC and photons measured by the PMD using $v_{dyn}$ for real events.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for first order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for first order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for second order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for second order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for third order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for third order of m.

The moments $r_{m,1}$(m=1-3) for real and mixed events as a function of order m in a fixed multiplicity bin of 47$\langle \sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }\langle 54$.

The $\Lambda\Lambda$ interaction parameters from this experiment.

The three-point correlator, $\gamma$, as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV.

The three-point correlator, $\gamma$, as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV.

The three-point correlator, $\gamma$, as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 7.7.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 7.7 GeV.

$H_{SS}-H{OS}$, as a function of beam energy for 60-80% centrality in Au+Au collisions.

$H_{SS}-H{OS}$, as a function of beam energy for 30-60% centrality in Au+Au collisions.

$H_{SS}-H{OS}$, as a function of beam energy for 10-30% centrality in Au+Au collisions.

Sample correlations in $\Delta\phi$ ($|\Delta\eta|<$ 1.78) for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The data are averaged between positive and negative $\Delta\phi$ and reflected in the plot.

Background subtracted sample correlations for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ on the near-side for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The dependence of the jet-like correlation is shown as a function of $\Delta\eta$ ($|\Delta\phi|<$ 0.78). The data are averaged between positive and negative $\Delta\eta$.

Background subtracted sample correlations for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ on the near-side for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The dependence of the jet-like correlation is shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ ($|\Delta\eta|<$ 1.78). The data are averaged between positive and negative $\Delta\phi$.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $p_T^{\mathrm{trigger}}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $p_T^{\mathrm{associated}}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu and 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu, 0-12% Au+Au and 40-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{trigger}}$ for 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{associated}}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{trigger}}$ for 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{associated}}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).

FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).

FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).

FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).

FIG. 1. (Color online) Perspective views of $2 \mathrm{D}$ charge-independent angular correlations $\Delta \rho / \sqrt{\rho_{\mathrm{ref}}}$ on $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ for Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=200$ and $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ (top and bottom rows, respectively). Centrality increases left to right from most peripheral to most central. Corrected total cross-section fractions are (left to right) $84 \%-93 \%, 55 \%-64 \%, 18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $200-\mathrm{GeV}$ data and $84 \%-95 \%, 56 \%-65 \%$ $18 \%-28 \%,$ and $0 \%-5 \%$ for the $62 \mathrm{GeV}$ data (see Tables III and IV).

FIG. 2. (Color online) Fit decomposition of the $46 \%-56 \%$ centrality data for 62 -GeV Au-Au collisions. The top panels show from left to right the corrected data, model fit, fit residuals (data - model), and same-side 2D Gaussian. The bottom panels similarly show the away-side azimuth dipole, the nonjet azimuth quadrupole, the 1D $\eta_{\Delta}$ Gaussian, and the 2D exponential. This centrality is just below the sharp transition at $v_{\text {trans }}=3$. Fit residuals (c) are scaled up eightfold relative to the data.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 3. Fit parameters for $\left(\eta_{\Delta}, \phi_{\Delta}\right)$ correlation data from Au-Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}}=62$ (open symbols) and 200 GeV (solid symbols) versus centrality measure $\nu$ computed at fixed energy $(200 \mathrm{GeV})$. The SS $2 \mathrm{D}$ Gaussian amplitudes, $\eta_{\Delta}$ widths, and $\phi_{\Delta}$ widths are shown in the left, center, and right panels, respectively of the top row. The bottom row shows from left to right the amplitudes for the dipole, quadrupole, and SS peak width aspect ratio $\sigma_{\eta_{\Delta}} / \sigma_{\phi_{\Delta}} .$ Fitting errors are indicated by error bars where larger than the symbols. Solid lines connect the points for clarity. The dotted and dashed curves indicate Glauber linear superposition estimates for 62 - and 200 -GeV peak amplitudes respectively, as discussed in the text. The quadrupole data are consistent with Ref. [60]. The hatched regions indicate the full range of systematic uncertainties listed in Appendix F. The vertical dark bands indicate estimated $v$ equivalents for $N-N$ collisions and $b=0$ Au-Au collisions.

FIG. 4. (Color online) (a) 2D data histogram from $0 \%-5 \%$ central 200 GeV Au-Au collisions $[(0,0)$ bin suppressed]. (b) Additional model component fitted to the $2 \mathrm{D}$ histogram and consisting of an AS azimuth dipole modulated by function $F\left(\eta_{\Delta}\right)$ described in the text. (c) Fit residuals including the new model component. (d) Data histogram in the first panel minus the additional model component and fitted offset. Remaining structure is described accurately by an AS dipole and SS 2D Gaussian.

FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).

FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).

FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).

FIG. 9. (a) Amplitude of SS 2D peak (jet-correlated pairs per final-state hadron) for data (solid points), GLS extrapolation from $p$ - $p$ data (dashed curve) and from the HIJING Monte Carlo (open points, dotted curve). (b) Single-particle production extrapolated from $p-p$ data (dashed curve, GLS), and from more-central Au-Au data (solid line) and HIJING (dash-dotted line, open points). (c) Single-particle hard-component production per $N-N$ binary collision from $p-p$ data, from more-central Au-Au data and from HIJING (open points). (d) Jet-correlated pair production (SS 2D peak) per $N-N$ binary collision extrapolated from $p-p$ data (GLS), and from Au-Au data (solid points) and HIJING (open points).

FIG. 11. (Color online) (Left) Uncorrected angular correlations from 62-GeV $37 \%-46 \%$ central Au-Au collisions showing pileup distortions, especially evident as the W-shaped nonuniformity of the AS ridge on $\eta_{\Delta}$. (Right) The same data with pileup correction applied.

Cross section as a function of DELTA(PHI) for leading jet transverse momentum > 56 GeV. . The (sys) error in the table is due to the limited MC statistics and is uncorrelated bin-to-bin. The other two systematic errors are correlated.

Cross section as a function of DELTA(PHI) for leading jet transverse momentum > 84 GeV. . The (sys) error in the table is due to the limited MC statistics and is uncorrelated bin-to-bin. The other two systematic errors are correlated.

Cross section as a function of DELTA(PHI) for leading jet transverse momentum > 120 GeV. . The (sys) error in the table is due to the limited MC statistics and is uncorrelated bin-to-bin. The other two systematic errors are correlated.

The double ratio R_double at 7000 GeV in different bins of charged particle multiplicity and kT.

The double ratio R_double at 7000 GeV in different bins of charged particle multiplicity.

Parameters of the fit to the double ratio R_double at 900 GeV.

Parameters of the fit to the double ratio R_double at 7000 GeV.