HEPData Search

README and Table of Contents

This is the HEPData space for the ATLAS SUSY EWK three-lepton search. The full resolution figures can be found at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/SUSY-2019-09/ The full statistical likelihoods have been provided for this analysis. They can be downloaded by clicking on the purple 'Resources' button above and selecting the 'Common Resources' category. Region yields: <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2012%20Onshell%20WZ%20Signal%20Region%20Yields%20Table">Tab 12 Onshell WZ Signal Region Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2013%20Onshell%20Wh%20Signal%20Region%20Yields%20Table">Tab 13 Onshell Wh Signal Region Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2014%20Offshell%20low-$E_{T}^{miss}$%20Signal%20Region%20Yields%20Table">Tab 14 Offshell low-$E_{T}^{miss}$ Signal Region Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2015%20Offshell%20high-$E_{T}^{miss}$%20Signal%20Region%20Yields%20Table">Tab 15 Offshell high-$E_{T}^{miss}$ Signal Region Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2020%20RJR%20Signal%20Region%20Yields%20Table">Tab 20 RJR Signal Region Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%204%20Onshell%20Control%20and%20Validation%20Region%20Yields">Fig 4 Onshell Control and Validation Region Yields</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%208%20Offshell%20Control%20and%20Validation%20Region%20Yields">Fig 8 Offshell Control and Validation Region Yields</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2010%20Onshell%20WZ%20Signal%20Region%20Yields">Fig 10 Onshell WZ Signal Region Yields</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2011%20Onshell%20Wh%20Signal%20Region%20Yields">Fig 11 Onshell Wh Signal Region Yields</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2012%20Offshell%20Signal%20Region%20Yields">Fig 12 Offshell Signal Region Yields</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2018%20RJR%20Control%20and%20Validation%20Region%20Yields">Fig 18 RJR Control and Validation Region Yields</a> </ul> Exclusion contours: <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20Obs">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20Obs_Up">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Obs_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20Obs_Down">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Obs_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20Exp">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20Exp_Up">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Exp_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20Exp_Down">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Exp_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20compressed_Obs">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), compressed_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20compressed_Exp">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), compressed_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20offshell_Obs">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), offshell_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20offshell_Exp">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), offshell_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20onshell_Obs">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), onshell_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20onshell_Exp">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), onshell_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs_Up">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs_Down">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp_Up">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp_Down">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20compressed_Obs">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20compressed_Exp">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20offshell_Obs">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20offshell_Exp">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20onshell_Obs">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), onshell_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20onshell_Exp">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), onshell_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs_Up">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs_Down">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp_Up">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp_Down">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20compressed_Obs">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20compressed_Exp">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20offshell_Obs">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20offshell_Exp">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs_Up">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Obs_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs_Down">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Obs_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp_Up">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Exp_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp_Down">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Exp_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20compressed_Obs">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), compressed_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20compressed_Exp">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), compressed_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20offshell_Obs">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), offshell_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20offshell_Exp">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), offshell_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2017%20Wh%20Exclusion,%20Obs">Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2017%20Wh%20Exclusion,%20Obs_Up">Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Obs_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2017%20Wh%20Exclusion,%20Obs_Down">Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Obs_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2017%20Wh%20Exclusion,%20Exp">Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2017%20Wh%20Exclusion,%20Exp_Up">Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Exp_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2017%20Wh%20Exclusion,%20Exp_Down">Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Exp_Down</a> </ul> Upper limits: <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208a%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Obs.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8a WZ Excl. Upper Limit Obs. Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208b%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Exp.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8b WZ Excl. Upper Limit Exp. Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208c%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Obs.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8c WZ Excl. Upper Limit Obs. Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208d%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Exp.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8d WZ Excl. Upper Limit Exp. Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208e%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Obs.%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8e WZ Excl. Upper Limit Obs. Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208f%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Exp.%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8f WZ Excl. Upper Limit Exp. Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208g%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Obs.%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8g WZ Excl. Upper Limit Obs. Higgsino ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208h%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Exp.%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8h WZ Excl. Upper Limit Exp. Higgsino ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%209a%20Wh%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Obs.">AuxFig 9a Wh Excl. Upper Limit Obs.</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%209b%20Wh%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Exp.">AuxFig 9b Wh Excl. Upper Limit Exp.</a> </ul> Model-independent discovery fits: <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2018%20Onshell%20Discovery%20Fit%20Table">Tab 18 Onshell Discovery Fit Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2019%20Offshell%20Discovery%20Fit%20Table">Tab 19 Offshell Discovery Fit Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2021%20RJR%20Discovery%20Fit%20Table">Tab 21 RJR Discovery Fit Table</a> </ul> Kinematic distributions: <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2013a%20SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$-1%20($\Delta%20R_{OS,%20near}$)">Fig 13a SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$-1 ($\Delta R_{OS, near}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2013b%20SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$-2%20(3rd%20Lep.%20$p_{T}$)">Fig 13b SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$-2 (3rd Lep. $p_{T}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2013c%20SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$%20($E_{T}^{miss}$)">Fig 13c SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$ ($E_{T}^{miss}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2013d%20SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$%20($m_{T}$)">Fig 13d SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$ ($m_{T}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2014a%20SR$^{offWZ}_{LowETmiss}$-0j%20($m_{T}^{minmll}$)">Fig 14a SR$^{offWZ}_{LowETmiss}$-0j ($m_{T}^{minmll}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2014b%20SR$^{offWZ}_{LowETmiss}$-nj%20($m_{T}^{minmll}$)">Fig 14b SR$^{offWZ}_{LowETmiss}$-nj ($m_{T}^{minmll}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2014c%20SR$^{offWZ}_{HighETmiss}$-0j%20($m_{T}^{minmll}$)">Fig 14c SR$^{offWZ}_{HighETmiss}$-0j ($m_{T}^{minmll}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2014d%20SR$^{offWZ}_{HighETmiss}$-nj%20($p_T^l%20\div%20E_T^{miss}$)">Fig 14d SR$^{offWZ}_{HighETmiss}$-nj ($p_T^l \div E_T^{miss}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2020a%20RJR%20SR3$\ell$-Low%20($p_{T}^{\ell%201}$)">Fig 20a RJR SR3$\ell$-Low ($p_{T}^{\ell 1}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2020b%20RJR%20SR3$\ell$-Low%20($H_{3,1}^{PP}$)">Fig 20b RJR SR3$\ell$-Low ($H_{3,1}^{PP}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2020c%20RJR%20SR3$\ell$-ISR%20($p_{T~ISR}^{CM}$)">Fig 20c RJR SR3$\ell$-ISR ($p_{T~ISR}^{CM}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2020d%20RJR%20SR3$\ell$-ISR%20($R_{ISR}$)">Fig 20d RJR SR3$\ell$-ISR ($R_{ISR}$)</a> </ul> Cutflows: <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%205%20Cutflow:%20Onshell%20WZ">AuxTab 5 Cutflow: Onshell WZ</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%206%20Cutflow:%20Onshell%20Wh">AuxTab 6 Cutflow: Onshell Wh</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%207%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20(250,235)">AuxTab 7 Cutflow: Offshell Wino-bino(+) (250,235)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%208%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20(125,85)">AuxTab 8 Cutflow: Offshell Wino-bino(+) (125,85)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%209%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20(250,170)">AuxTab 9 Cutflow: Offshell Wino-bino(+) (250,170)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%2010%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Wino-bino(-)%20(250,235)">AuxTab 10 Cutflow: Offshell Wino-bino(-) (250,235)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%2011%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Wino-bino(-)%20(125,85)">AuxTab 11 Cutflow: Offshell Wino-bino(-) (125,85)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%2012%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Wino-bino(-)%20(250,170)">AuxTab 12 Cutflow: Offshell Wino-bino(-) (250,170)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%2013%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Higgsino%20(120,100)">AuxTab 13 Cutflow: Offshell Higgsino (120,100)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%2014%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Higgsino%20(100,40)">AuxTab 14 Cutflow: Offshell Higgsino (100,40)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%2015%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Higgsino%20(185,125)">AuxTab 15 Cutflow: Offshell Higgsino (185,125)</a> </ul> Acceptances and Efficiencies: <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2010a%20Acc:%20Onshell%20SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$">AuxFig 10a Acc: Onshell SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2010b%20Eff:%20Onshell%20SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$">AuxFig 10b Eff: Onshell SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2010c%20Acc:%20Onshell%20SR$_{nj}^{WZ}$">AuxFig 10c Acc: Onshell SR$_{nj}^{WZ}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2010d%20Eff:%20Onshell%20SR$_{nj}^{WZ}$">AuxFig 10d Eff: Onshell SR$_{nj}^{WZ}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2011a%20Acc:%20Onshell%20SR$_{low-m_{ll}-0j}^{Wh}$">AuxFig 11a Acc: Onshell SR$_{low-m_{ll}-0j}^{Wh}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2011b%20Eff:%20Onshell%20SR$_{low-m_{ll}-0j}^{Wh}$">AuxFig 11b Eff: Onshell SR$_{low-m_{ll}-0j}^{Wh}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2011c%20Acc:%20Onshell%20SR$_{low-m_{ll}-nj}^{Wh}$">AuxFig 11c Acc: Onshell SR$_{low-m_{ll}-nj}^{Wh}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2011d%20Eff:%20Onshell%20SR$_{low-m_{ll}-nj}^{Wh}$">AuxFig 11d Eff: Onshell SR$_{low-m_{ll}-nj}^{Wh}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2011e%20Acc:%20Onshell%20SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$">AuxFig 11e Acc: Onshell SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2011f%20Eff:%20Onshell%20SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$">AuxFig 11f Eff: Onshell SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012a%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 12a Acc: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012b%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 12b Eff: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012c%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 12c Acc: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012d%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 12d Eff: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012e%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 12e Acc: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012f%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 12f Eff: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012g%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 12g Acc: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012h%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 12h Eff: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013a%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 13a Acc: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013b%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 13b Eff: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013c%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 13c Acc: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013d%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 13d Eff: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013e%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 13e Acc: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013f%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 13f Eff: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013g%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 13g Acc: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013h%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 13h Eff: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014a%20Acc:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 14a Acc: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014b%20Eff:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 14b Eff: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014c%20Acc:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 14c Acc: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014d%20Eff:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 14d Eff: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014e%20Acc:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 14e Acc: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014f%20Eff:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 14f Eff: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014g%20Acc:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 14g Acc: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014h%20Eff:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 14h Eff: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj</a> </ul>

README and Table of Contents

This is the HEPData space for the ATLAS SUSY EWK three-lepton search. The full resolution figures can be found at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/SUSY-2019-09/ The full statistical likelihoods have been provided for this analysis. They can be downloaded by clicking on the purple 'Resources' button above and selecting the 'Common Resources' category. Region yields: <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2012%20Onshell%20WZ%20Signal%20Region%20Yields%20Table">Tab 12 Onshell WZ Signal Region Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2013%20Onshell%20Wh%20Signal%20Region%20Yields%20Table">Tab 13 Onshell Wh Signal Region Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2014%20Offshell%20low-$E_{T}^{miss}$%20Signal%20Region%20Yields%20Table">Tab 14 Offshell low-$E_{T}^{miss}$ Signal Region Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2015%20Offshell%20high-$E_{T}^{miss}$%20Signal%20Region%20Yields%20Table">Tab 15 Offshell high-$E_{T}^{miss}$ Signal Region Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2020%20RJR%20Signal%20Region%20Yields%20Table">Tab 20 RJR Signal Region Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%204%20Onshell%20Control%20and%20Validation%20Region%20Yields">Fig 4 Onshell Control and Validation Region Yields</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%208%20Offshell%20Control%20and%20Validation%20Region%20Yields">Fig 8 Offshell Control and Validation Region Yields</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2010%20Onshell%20WZ%20Signal%20Region%20Yields">Fig 10 Onshell WZ Signal Region Yields</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2011%20Onshell%20Wh%20Signal%20Region%20Yields">Fig 11 Onshell Wh Signal Region Yields</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2012%20Offshell%20Signal%20Region%20Yields">Fig 12 Offshell Signal Region Yields</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2018%20RJR%20Control%20and%20Validation%20Region%20Yields">Fig 18 RJR Control and Validation Region Yields</a> </ul> Exclusion contours: <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20Obs">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20Obs_Up">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Obs_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20Obs_Down">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Obs_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20Exp">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20Exp_Up">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Exp_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20Exp_Down">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Exp_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20compressed_Obs">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), compressed_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20compressed_Exp">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), compressed_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20offshell_Obs">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), offshell_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20offshell_Exp">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), offshell_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20onshell_Obs">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), onshell_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016a%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b),%20onshell_Exp">Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), onshell_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs_Up">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs_Down">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp_Up">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp_Down">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20compressed_Obs">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20compressed_Exp">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20offshell_Obs">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20offshell_Exp">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20onshell_Obs">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), onshell_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016b%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20onshell_Exp">Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), onshell_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs_Up">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs_Down">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp_Up">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp_Down">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20compressed_Obs">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20compressed_Exp">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20offshell_Obs">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016c%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$),%20offshell_Exp">Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs_Up">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Obs_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Obs_Down">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Obs_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp_Up">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Exp_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20Exp_Down">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Exp_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20compressed_Obs">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), compressed_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20compressed_Exp">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), compressed_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20offshell_Obs">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), offshell_Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2016d%20WZ%20Exclusion:%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$),%20offshell_Exp">Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), offshell_Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2017%20Wh%20Exclusion,%20Obs">Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Obs</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2017%20Wh%20Exclusion,%20Obs_Up">Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Obs_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2017%20Wh%20Exclusion,%20Obs_Down">Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Obs_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2017%20Wh%20Exclusion,%20Exp">Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Exp</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2017%20Wh%20Exclusion,%20Exp_Up">Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Exp_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2017%20Wh%20Exclusion,%20Exp_Down">Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Exp_Down</a> </ul> Upper limits: <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208a%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Obs.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8a WZ Excl. Upper Limit Obs. Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208b%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Exp.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8b WZ Excl. Upper Limit Exp. Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208c%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Obs.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8c WZ Excl. Upper Limit Obs. Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208d%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Exp.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8d WZ Excl. Upper Limit Exp. Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208e%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Obs.%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8e WZ Excl. Upper Limit Obs. Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208f%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Exp.%20Wino-bino(-)%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8f WZ Excl. Upper Limit Exp. Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208g%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Obs.%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8g WZ Excl. Upper Limit Obs. Higgsino ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%208h%20WZ%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Exp.%20Higgsino%20($\Delta%20m$)">AuxFig 8h WZ Excl. Upper Limit Exp. Higgsino ($\Delta m$)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%209a%20Wh%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Obs.">AuxFig 9a Wh Excl. Upper Limit Obs.</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%209b%20Wh%20Excl.%20Upper%20Limit%20Exp.">AuxFig 9b Wh Excl. Upper Limit Exp.</a> </ul> Model-independent discovery fits: <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2018%20Onshell%20Discovery%20Fit%20Table">Tab 18 Onshell Discovery Fit Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2019%20Offshell%20Discovery%20Fit%20Table">Tab 19 Offshell Discovery Fit Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Tab%2021%20RJR%20Discovery%20Fit%20Table">Tab 21 RJR Discovery Fit Table</a> </ul> Kinematic distributions: <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2013a%20SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$-1%20($\Delta%20R_{OS,%20near}$)">Fig 13a SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$-1 ($\Delta R_{OS, near}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2013b%20SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$-2%20(3rd%20Lep.%20$p_{T}$)">Fig 13b SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$-2 (3rd Lep. $p_{T}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2013c%20SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$%20($E_{T}^{miss}$)">Fig 13c SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$ ($E_{T}^{miss}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2013d%20SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$%20($m_{T}$)">Fig 13d SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$ ($m_{T}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2014a%20SR$^{offWZ}_{LowETmiss}$-0j%20($m_{T}^{minmll}$)">Fig 14a SR$^{offWZ}_{LowETmiss}$-0j ($m_{T}^{minmll}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2014b%20SR$^{offWZ}_{LowETmiss}$-nj%20($m_{T}^{minmll}$)">Fig 14b SR$^{offWZ}_{LowETmiss}$-nj ($m_{T}^{minmll}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2014c%20SR$^{offWZ}_{HighETmiss}$-0j%20($m_{T}^{minmll}$)">Fig 14c SR$^{offWZ}_{HighETmiss}$-0j ($m_{T}^{minmll}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2014d%20SR$^{offWZ}_{HighETmiss}$-nj%20($p_T^l%20\div%20E_T^{miss}$)">Fig 14d SR$^{offWZ}_{HighETmiss}$-nj ($p_T^l \div E_T^{miss}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2020a%20RJR%20SR3$\ell$-Low%20($p_{T}^{\ell%201}$)">Fig 20a RJR SR3$\ell$-Low ($p_{T}^{\ell 1}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2020b%20RJR%20SR3$\ell$-Low%20($H_{3,1}^{PP}$)">Fig 20b RJR SR3$\ell$-Low ($H_{3,1}^{PP}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2020c%20RJR%20SR3$\ell$-ISR%20($p_{T~ISR}^{CM}$)">Fig 20c RJR SR3$\ell$-ISR ($p_{T~ISR}^{CM}$)</a> <li><a href="?table=Fig%2020d%20RJR%20SR3$\ell$-ISR%20($R_{ISR}$)">Fig 20d RJR SR3$\ell$-ISR ($R_{ISR}$)</a> </ul> Cutflows: <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%205%20Cutflow:%20Onshell%20WZ">AuxTab 5 Cutflow: Onshell WZ</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%206%20Cutflow:%20Onshell%20Wh">AuxTab 6 Cutflow: Onshell Wh</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%207%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20(250,235)">AuxTab 7 Cutflow: Offshell Wino-bino(+) (250,235)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%208%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20(125,85)">AuxTab 8 Cutflow: Offshell Wino-bino(+) (125,85)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%209%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20(250,170)">AuxTab 9 Cutflow: Offshell Wino-bino(+) (250,170)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%2010%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Wino-bino(-)%20(250,235)">AuxTab 10 Cutflow: Offshell Wino-bino(-) (250,235)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%2011%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Wino-bino(-)%20(125,85)">AuxTab 11 Cutflow: Offshell Wino-bino(-) (125,85)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%2012%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Wino-bino(-)%20(250,170)">AuxTab 12 Cutflow: Offshell Wino-bino(-) (250,170)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%2013%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Higgsino%20(120,100)">AuxTab 13 Cutflow: Offshell Higgsino (120,100)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%2014%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Higgsino%20(100,40)">AuxTab 14 Cutflow: Offshell Higgsino (100,40)</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxTab%2015%20Cutflow:%20Offshell%20Higgsino%20(185,125)">AuxTab 15 Cutflow: Offshell Higgsino (185,125)</a> </ul> Acceptances and Efficiencies: <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2010a%20Acc:%20Onshell%20SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$">AuxFig 10a Acc: Onshell SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2010b%20Eff:%20Onshell%20SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$">AuxFig 10b Eff: Onshell SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2010c%20Acc:%20Onshell%20SR$_{nj}^{WZ}$">AuxFig 10c Acc: Onshell SR$_{nj}^{WZ}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2010d%20Eff:%20Onshell%20SR$_{nj}^{WZ}$">AuxFig 10d Eff: Onshell SR$_{nj}^{WZ}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2011a%20Acc:%20Onshell%20SR$_{low-m_{ll}-0j}^{Wh}$">AuxFig 11a Acc: Onshell SR$_{low-m_{ll}-0j}^{Wh}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2011b%20Eff:%20Onshell%20SR$_{low-m_{ll}-0j}^{Wh}$">AuxFig 11b Eff: Onshell SR$_{low-m_{ll}-0j}^{Wh}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2011c%20Acc:%20Onshell%20SR$_{low-m_{ll}-nj}^{Wh}$">AuxFig 11c Acc: Onshell SR$_{low-m_{ll}-nj}^{Wh}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2011d%20Eff:%20Onshell%20SR$_{low-m_{ll}-nj}^{Wh}$">AuxFig 11d Eff: Onshell SR$_{low-m_{ll}-nj}^{Wh}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2011e%20Acc:%20Onshell%20SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$">AuxFig 11e Acc: Onshell SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2011f%20Eff:%20Onshell%20SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$">AuxFig 11f Eff: Onshell SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012a%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 12a Acc: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012b%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 12b Eff: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012c%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 12c Acc: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012d%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 12d Eff: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012e%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 12e Acc: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012f%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 12f Eff: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012g%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 12g Acc: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2012h%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(%2b)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 12h Eff: Off. Wino-bino(+) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013a%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 13a Acc: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013b%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 13b Eff: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013c%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 13c Acc: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013d%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 13d Eff: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013e%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 13e Acc: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013f%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 13f Eff: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013g%20Acc:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 13g Acc: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2013h%20Eff:%20Off.%20Wino-bino(-)%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 13h Eff: Off. Wino-bino(-) SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014a%20Acc:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 14a Acc: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014b%20Eff:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 14b Eff: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014c%20Acc:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 14c Acc: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014d%20Eff:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 14d Eff: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{lowETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014e%20Acc:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 14e Acc: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014f%20Eff:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j">AuxFig 14f Eff: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-0j</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014g%20Acc:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 14g Acc: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj</a> <li><a href="?table=AuxFig%2014h%20Eff:%20Off.%20Higgsino%20SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj">AuxFig 14h Eff: Off. Higgsino SR$^{offWZ}_{highETmiss}$-nj</a> </ul>

Fig 4 Onshell Control and Validation Region Yields

Comparison of the observed data and expected SM background yields in the CRs (pre-fit) and VRs (post-fit) of the onshell $W\!Z$ and $W\!h$ selections. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. The hatched band indicates the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the relative difference between the observed data and expected yields for the CRs and the significance of the difference for the VRs, calculated with the profile likelihood method from [169], adding a minus sign if the yield is below the prediction.

Fig 4 Onshell Control and Validation Region Yields

Comparison of the observed data and expected SM background yields in the CRs (pre-fit) and VRs (post-fit) of the onshell $W\!Z$ and $W\!h$ selections. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. The hatched band indicates the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the relative difference between the observed data and expected yields for the CRs and the significance of the difference for the VRs, calculated with the profile likelihood method from [169], adding a minus sign if the yield is below the prediction.

Fig 8 Offshell Control and Validation Region Yields

Comparison of the observed data and expected SM background yields in the CRs and VRs of the offshell $W\!Z$ selection. The SM prediction is taken from the background-only fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. The hatched band indicates the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the difference between the observed and expected yields, calculated with the profile likelihood method from [169], adding a minus sign if the yield is below the prediction.

Fig 8 Offshell Control and Validation Region Yields

Comparison of the observed data and expected SM background yields in the CRs and VRs of the offshell $W\!Z$ selection. The SM prediction is taken from the background-only fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. The hatched band indicates the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the difference between the observed and expected yields, calculated with the profile likelihood method from [169], adding a minus sign if the yield is below the prediction.

Tab 12 Onshell WZ Signal Region Yields Table

Observed and expected yields after the background-only fit in the SRs for the onshell $W\!Z$ selection. The normalization factors of the $W\!Z$ sample are extracted separately for the 0j, low-HT and high-HT regions, and are treated separately in the combined fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are presented.

Tab 12 Onshell WZ Signal Region Yields Table

Observed and expected yields after the background-only fit in the SRs for the onshell $W\!Z$ selection. The normalization factors of the $W\!Z$ sample are extracted separately for the 0j, low-HT and high-HT regions, and are treated separately in the combined fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are presented.

Tab 13 Onshell Wh Signal Region Yields Table

Observed and expected yields after the background-only fit in the SRs for the $W\!h$ selection. The normalization factors of the $W\!Z$ sample are extracted separately for the 0j, low-HT and high-HT regions, and are treated separately in the combined fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, tt̄+X and rare top processes. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are presented.

Tab 13 Onshell Wh Signal Region Yields Table

Observed and expected yields after the background-only fit in the SRs for the $W\!h$ selection. The normalization factors of the $W\!Z$ sample are extracted separately for the 0j, low-HT and high-HT regions, and are treated separately in the combined fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, tt̄+X and rare top processes. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are presented.

Fig 10 Onshell WZ Signal Region Yields

Comparison of the observed data and expected SM background yields in the SRs of the onshell $W\!Z$ selection. The SM prediction is taken from the background-only fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. The hatched band indicates the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the significance of the difference between the observed and expected yields, calculated with the profile likelihood method from [169], adding a minus sign if the yield is below the prediction.

Fig 10 Onshell WZ Signal Region Yields

Comparison of the observed data and expected SM background yields in the SRs of the onshell $W\!Z$ selection. The SM prediction is taken from the background-only fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. The hatched band indicates the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the significance of the difference between the observed and expected yields, calculated with the profile likelihood method from [169], adding a minus sign if the yield is below the prediction.

Fig 11 Onshell Wh Signal Region Yields

Comparison of the observed data and expected SM background yields in the SRs of the $W\!h$ selection. The SM prediction is taken from the background-only fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, tt̄+X and rare top processes. The hatched band indicates the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!h$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the significance of the difference between the observed and expected yields, calculated with the profile likelihood method from [169], adding a minus sign if the yield is below the prediction.

Fig 11 Onshell Wh Signal Region Yields

Comparison of the observed data and expected SM background yields in the SRs of the $W\!h$ selection. The SM prediction is taken from the background-only fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, tt̄+X and rare top processes. The hatched band indicates the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!h$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the significance of the difference between the observed and expected yields, calculated with the profile likelihood method from [169], adding a minus sign if the yield is below the prediction.

Tab 14 Offshell low-$E_{T}^{miss}$ Signal Region Yields Table

Observed and expected yields after the background-only fit in SRoffWZlowETmiss. The normalization factors of the $W\!Z$ sample extracted separately for 0j and nj, and are treated separately in the combined fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are presented.

Tab 14 Offshell low-$E_{T}^{miss}$ Signal Region Yields Table

Observed and expected yields after the background-only fit in SRoffWZlowETmiss. The normalization factors of the $W\!Z$ sample extracted separately for 0j and nj, and are treated separately in the combined fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are presented.

Tab 15 Offshell high-$E_{T}^{miss}$ Signal Region Yields Table

Observed and expected yields after the background-only fit in SRoffWZhighETmiss. The normalization factors of the $W\!Z$ sample extracted separately for 0j and nj, and are treated separately in the combined fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are presented.

Tab 15 Offshell high-$E_{T}^{miss}$ Signal Region Yields Table

Observed and expected yields after the background-only fit in SRoffWZhighETmiss. The normalization factors of the $W\!Z$ sample extracted separately for 0j and nj, and are treated separately in the combined fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are presented.

Fig 12 Offshell Signal Region Yields

Comparison of the observed data and expected SM background yields in the SRs of the offshell $W\!Z$ selection. The SM prediction is taken from the background-only fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. The hatched band indicates the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W^{*}\!Z^{*}$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the significance of the difference between the observed and expected yields, calculated with the profile likelihood method from [169], adding a minus sign if the yield is below the prediction.

Fig 12 Offshell Signal Region Yields

Comparison of the observed data and expected SM background yields in the SRs of the offshell $W\!Z$ selection. The SM prediction is taken from the background-only fit. The "Others" category contains the single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. The hatched band indicates the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W^{*}\!Z^{*}$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the significance of the difference between the observed and expected yields, calculated with the profile likelihood method from [169], adding a minus sign if the yield is below the prediction.

Fig 13a SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$-1 ($\Delta R_{OS, near}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the onshell $W\!Z$ and $W\!h$ selections. The figure shows (a) the ΔROS,near distribution in SRWhDF-1, (b) the 3rd leading lepton pT in SRWhDF-2, and the (c) ETmiss and (d) mT distributions in SRWZ0j (with all SR-i bins of SRWZ0j summed up). The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes, except in the top panels, where triboson and Higgs production contributions are shown separately, and tt̄+X is merged into Others. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$/$W\!h$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 13a SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$-1 ($\Delta R_{OS, near}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the onshell $W\!Z$ and $W\!h$ selections. The figure shows (a) the ΔROS,near distribution in SRWhDF-1, (b) the 3rd leading lepton pT in SRWhDF-2, and the (c) ETmiss and (d) mT distributions in SRWZ0j (with all SR-i bins of SRWZ0j summed up). The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes, except in the top panels, where triboson and Higgs production contributions are shown separately, and tt̄+X is merged into Others. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$/$W\!h$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 13b SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$-2 (3rd Lep. $p_{T}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the onshell $W\!Z$ and $W\!h$ selections. The figure shows (a) the ΔROS,near distribution in SRWhDF-1, (b) the 3rd leading lepton pT in SRWhDF-2, and the (c) ETmiss and (d) mT distributions in SRWZ0j (with all SR-i bins of SRWZ0j summed up). The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes, except in the top panels, where triboson and Higgs production contributions are shown separately, and tt̄+X is merged into Others. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$/$W\!h$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 13b SR$_{DFOS}^{Wh}$-2 (3rd Lep. $p_{T}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the onshell $W\!Z$ and $W\!h$ selections. The figure shows (a) the ΔROS,near distribution in SRWhDF-1, (b) the 3rd leading lepton pT in SRWhDF-2, and the (c) ETmiss and (d) mT distributions in SRWZ0j (with all SR-i bins of SRWZ0j summed up). The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes, except in the top panels, where triboson and Higgs production contributions are shown separately, and tt̄+X is merged into Others. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$/$W\!h$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 13c SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$ ($E_{T}^{miss}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the onshell $W\!Z$ and $W\!h$ selections. The figure shows (a) the ΔROS,near distribution in SRWhDF-1, (b) the 3rd leading lepton pT in SRWhDF-2, and the (c) ETmiss and (d) mT distributions in SRWZ0j (with all SR-i bins of SRWZ0j summed up). The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes, except in the top panels, where triboson and Higgs production contributions are shown separately, and tt̄+X is merged into Others. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$/$W\!h$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 13c SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$ ($E_{T}^{miss}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the onshell $W\!Z$ and $W\!h$ selections. The figure shows (a) the ΔROS,near distribution in SRWhDF-1, (b) the 3rd leading lepton pT in SRWhDF-2, and the (c) ETmiss and (d) mT distributions in SRWZ0j (with all SR-i bins of SRWZ0j summed up). The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes, except in the top panels, where triboson and Higgs production contributions are shown separately, and tt̄+X is merged into Others. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$/$W\!h$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 13d SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$ ($m_{T}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the onshell $W\!Z$ and $W\!h$ selections. The figure shows (a) the ΔROS,near distribution in SRWhDF-1, (b) the 3rd leading lepton pT in SRWhDF-2, and the (c) ETmiss and (d) mT distributions in SRWZ0j (with all SR-i bins of SRWZ0j summed up). The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes, except in the top panels, where triboson and Higgs production contributions are shown separately, and tt̄+X is merged into Others. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$/$W\!h$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 13d SR$_{0j}^{WZ}$ ($m_{T}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the onshell $W\!Z$ and $W\!h$ selections. The figure shows (a) the ΔROS,near distribution in SRWhDF-1, (b) the 3rd leading lepton pT in SRWhDF-2, and the (c) ETmiss and (d) mT distributions in SRWZ0j (with all SR-i bins of SRWZ0j summed up). The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes, except in the top panels, where triboson and Higgs production contributions are shown separately, and tt̄+X is merged into Others. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$/$W\!h$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 14a SR$^{offWZ}_{LowETmiss}$-0j ($m_{T}^{minmll}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the offshell $W\!Z$ selection. The figure shows the mTmllmin distribution in (a) SRoffWZlowETmiss-0j, (b) SRoffWZlowETmiss-nj and (c) SRoffWZhighETmiss-0j, and the |pTlep|/ETmiss distribution in (d) SRoffWZhighETmiss-nj. The contributing mllmin mass bins within each SRoffWZ category are summed together. The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 14a SR$^{offWZ}_{LowETmiss}$-0j ($m_{T}^{minmll}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the offshell $W\!Z$ selection. The figure shows the mTmllmin distribution in (a) SRoffWZlowETmiss-0j, (b) SRoffWZlowETmiss-nj and (c) SRoffWZhighETmiss-0j, and the |pTlep|/ETmiss distribution in (d) SRoffWZhighETmiss-nj. The contributing mllmin mass bins within each SRoffWZ category are summed together. The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 14b SR$^{offWZ}_{LowETmiss}$-nj ($m_{T}^{minmll}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the offshell $W\!Z$ selection. The figure shows the mTmllmin distribution in (a) SRoffWZlowETmiss-0j, (b) SRoffWZlowETmiss-nj and (c) SRoffWZhighETmiss-0j, and the |pTlep|/ETmiss distribution in (d) SRoffWZhighETmiss-nj. The contributing mllmin mass bins within each SRoffWZ category are summed together. The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 14b SR$^{offWZ}_{LowETmiss}$-nj ($m_{T}^{minmll}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the offshell $W\!Z$ selection. The figure shows the mTmllmin distribution in (a) SRoffWZlowETmiss-0j, (b) SRoffWZlowETmiss-nj and (c) SRoffWZhighETmiss-0j, and the |pTlep|/ETmiss distribution in (d) SRoffWZhighETmiss-nj. The contributing mllmin mass bins within each SRoffWZ category are summed together. The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 14c SR$^{offWZ}_{HighETmiss}$-0j ($m_{T}^{minmll}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the offshell $W\!Z$ selection. The figure shows the mTmllmin distribution in (a) SRoffWZlowETmiss-0j, (b) SRoffWZlowETmiss-nj and (c) SRoffWZhighETmiss-0j, and the |pTlep|/ETmiss distribution in (d) SRoffWZhighETmiss-nj. The contributing mllmin mass bins within each SRoffWZ category are summed together. The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 14c SR$^{offWZ}_{HighETmiss}$-0j ($m_{T}^{minmll}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the offshell $W\!Z$ selection. The figure shows the mTmllmin distribution in (a) SRoffWZlowETmiss-0j, (b) SRoffWZlowETmiss-nj and (c) SRoffWZhighETmiss-0j, and the |pTlep|/ETmiss distribution in (d) SRoffWZhighETmiss-nj. The contributing mllmin mass bins within each SRoffWZ category are summed together. The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 14d SR$^{offWZ}_{HighETmiss}$-nj ($p_T^l \div E_T^{miss}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the offshell $W\!Z$ selection. The figure shows the mTmllmin distribution in (a) SRoffWZlowETmiss-0j, (b) SRoffWZlowETmiss-nj and (c) SRoffWZhighETmiss-0j, and the |pTlep|/ETmiss distribution in (d) SRoffWZhighETmiss-nj. The contributing mllmin mass bins within each SRoffWZ category are summed together. The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 14d SR$^{offWZ}_{HighETmiss}$-nj ($p_T^l \div E_T^{miss}$)

Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in SRs of the offshell $W\!Z$ selection. The figure shows the mTmllmin distribution in (a) SRoffWZlowETmiss-0j, (b) SRoffWZlowETmiss-nj and (c) SRoffWZhighETmiss-0j, and the |pTlep|/ETmiss distribution in (d) SRoffWZhighETmiss-nj. The contributing mllmin mass bins within each SRoffWZ category are summed together. The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by an arrow. The last bin includes overflow. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from single-top, WW, triboson, Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Tab 18 Onshell Discovery Fit Table

Observed (Nobs) yields after the discovery-fit and expected (Nexp) after the background-only fit, for the inclusive SRs of the onshell $W\!Z$ and $W\!h$ selections. The third and fourth column list the 95 CL upper limits on the visible cross-section (σvis95) and on the number of signal events (Sobs95). The fifth column (Sexp95) shows the 95 CL upper limit on the number of signal events, given the expected number (and ± 1σ excursions on the expectation) of background events. The last two columns indicate the CLb value, i.e. the confidence level observed for the background-only hypothesis, and the discovery p-value (p(s = 0)). If the observed yield is below the expected yield, the p-value is capped at 0.5.

Tab 18 Onshell Discovery Fit Table

Observed (Nobs) yields after the discovery-fit and expected (Nexp) after the background-only fit, for the inclusive SRs of the onshell $W\!Z$ and $W\!h$ selections. The third and fourth column list the 95 CL upper limits on the visible cross-section (σvis95) and on the number of signal events (Sobs95). The fifth column (Sexp95) shows the 95 CL upper limit on the number of signal events, given the expected number (and ± 1σ excursions on the expectation) of background events. The last two columns indicate the CLb value, i.e. the confidence level observed for the background-only hypothesis, and the discovery p-value (p(s = 0)). If the observed yield is below the expected yield, the p-value is capped at 0.5.

Tab 19 Offshell Discovery Fit Table

Observed (Nobs) yields after the discovery-fit and expected (Nexp) after the background-only fit, for the inclusive SRs of the offshell $W\!Z$ selection. The third and fourth column list the 95 CL upper limits on the visible cross section (σvis95) and on the number of signal events (Sobs95). The fifth column (Sexp95) shows the 95 CL upper limit on the number of signal events, given the expected number (and ± 1σ excursions on the expectation) of background events. The last two columns indicate the CLb value, i.e. the confidence level observed for the background-only hypothesis, and the discovery p-value (p(s = 0)). If the observed yield is below the expected yield, the p-value is capped at 0.5.

Tab 19 Offshell Discovery Fit Table

Observed (Nobs) yields after the discovery-fit and expected (Nexp) after the background-only fit, for the inclusive SRs of the offshell $W\!Z$ selection. The third and fourth column list the 95 CL upper limits on the visible cross section (σvis95) and on the number of signal events (Sobs95). The fifth column (Sexp95) shows the 95 CL upper limit on the number of signal events, given the expected number (and ± 1σ excursions on the expectation) of background events. The last two columns indicate the CLb value, i.e. the confidence level observed for the background-only hypothesis, and the discovery p-value (p(s = 0)). If the observed yield is below the expected yield, the p-value is capped at 0.5.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Obs_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Obs_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Obs_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Obs_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Exp_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Exp_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Exp_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), Exp_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), compressed_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), compressed_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), compressed_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), compressed_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), offshell_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), offshell_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), offshell_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), offshell_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), onshell_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), onshell_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), onshell_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16a WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+), onshell_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), onshell_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), onshell_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), onshell_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16b WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$), onshell_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Obs_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), Exp_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), compressed_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16c WZ Exclusion: Wino-bino(-) ($\Delta m$), offshell_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Obs_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Obs_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Obs_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Obs_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Exp_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Exp_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Exp_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), Exp_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), compressed_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), compressed_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), compressed_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), compressed_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), offshell_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), offshell_Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), offshell_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 16d WZ Exclusion: Higgsino ($\Delta m$), offshell_Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!Z$-mediated models in the (a,b) wino/bino (+) scenario, (c) the wino/bino (-) scenario, and (d) the higgsino scenario. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σexp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties. The statistical combination of the onshell $W\!Z$, offshell $W\!Z$, and compressed results is shown as the main contour, while the observed (expected) limits for each individual selection are overlaid in green, blue, and orange solid (dashed) lines, respectively. The exclusion is shown projected (a) onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane or (b,c,d) onto the m(χ̃20) vs Δm plane. The light grey area denotes (top) the constraints obtained by the previous equivalent analysis in ATLAS using the 8 TeV 20.3 fb-1 dataset [17], and (d) the LEP lower χ̃1± mass limit [56]. The pale blue line in the top right panel represents the mass splitting range that yields a dark matter relic density equal to the observed relic density, Ω h2=0.1186±0.0020 [172], when the mass parameters of all the decoupled SUSY partners are set to 5 TeV and tanβ is chosen such that the SM-like Higgs boson mass is consistent with the observed value [43]. The area above (below) the blue line represents a dark-matter relic density larger (smaller) than the observed.

Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!h$med in the wino/bino (+) scenario, calculated using the $W\!h$ SRs and projected onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σ{exp} (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties.

Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Obs

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!h$med in the wino/bino (+) scenario, calculated using the $W\!h$ SRs and projected onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σ{exp} (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties.

Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Obs_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!h$med in the wino/bino (+) scenario, calculated using the $W\!h$ SRs and projected onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σ{exp} (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties.

Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Obs_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!h$med in the wino/bino (+) scenario, calculated using the $W\!h$ SRs and projected onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σ{exp} (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties.

Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Obs_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!h$med in the wino/bino (+) scenario, calculated using the $W\!h$ SRs and projected onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σ{exp} (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties.

Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Obs_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!h$med in the wino/bino (+) scenario, calculated using the $W\!h$ SRs and projected onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σ{exp} (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties.

Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!h$med in the wino/bino (+) scenario, calculated using the $W\!h$ SRs and projected onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σ{exp} (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties.

Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Exp

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!h$med in the wino/bino (+) scenario, calculated using the $W\!h$ SRs and projected onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σ{exp} (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties.

Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Exp_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!h$med in the wino/bino (+) scenario, calculated using the $W\!h$ SRs and projected onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σ{exp} (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties.

Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Exp_Up

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!h$med in the wino/bino (+) scenario, calculated using the $W\!h$ SRs and projected onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σ{exp} (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties.

Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Exp_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!h$med in the wino/bino (+) scenario, calculated using the $W\!h$ SRs and projected onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σ{exp} (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties.

Fig 17 Wh Exclusion, Exp_Down

Exclusion limits obtained for the $W\!h$med in the wino/bino (+) scenario, calculated using the $W\!h$ SRs and projected onto the m(χ̃1±, χ̃20) vs m(χ̃10) plane. The expected 95 CL sensitivity (dashed black line) is shown with ±1σ{exp} (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields, the observed limit (red solid line) is shown with ±1σtheory (dotted red lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties.

Fig 18 RJR Control and Validation Region Yields

Comparison of the observed data and expected SM background yields in the CRs and VRs of the RJR selection. The SM prediction is taken from the background-only fit. The "FNP leptons" category contains backgrounds from tt̄, tW, WW and Z+jets processes. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from Higgs and rare top processes. The hatched band indicates the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the difference between the observed and expected yields, calculated with the profile likelihood method from [169], adding a minus sign if the yield is below the prediction.

Fig 18 RJR Control and Validation Region Yields

Comparison of the observed data and expected SM background yields in the CRs and VRs of the RJR selection. The SM prediction is taken from the background-only fit. The "FNP leptons" category contains backgrounds from tt̄, tW, WW and Z+jets processes. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from Higgs and rare top processes. The hatched band indicates the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the significance of the difference between the observed and expected yields, calculated with the profile likelihood method from [169], adding a minus sign if the yield is below the prediction.

Tab 20 RJR Signal Region Yields Table

Observed and expected yields after the background-only fit in the SRs for the RJR selection. The "FNP leptons" category contains backgrounds from tt̄, tW, WW and Z+jets processes. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from Higgs and rare top processes. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are presented.

Tab 20 RJR Signal Region Yields Table

Observed and expected yields after the background-only fit in the SRs for the RJR selection. The "FNP leptons" category contains backgrounds from tt̄, tW, WW and Z+jets processes. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from Higgs and rare top processes. Combined statistical and systematic uncertainties are presented.

Fig 20a RJR SR3$\ell$-Low ($p_{T}^{\ell 1}$)

Example of kinematic distributions after the background-only fit, showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in regions of the RJR selection. The figure shows the (a) pTℓ1 and (b) HPP3,1 distributions in SR3ℓ-Low, and the (c) pCMT ISR and (d) RISR distributions in SR3ℓ-ISR. The last bin includes overflow. The "FNP leptons" category contains backgrounds from tt̄, tW, WW and Z+jets processes. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 20a RJR SR3$\ell$-Low ($p_{T}^{\ell 1}$)

Example of kinematic distributions after the background-only fit, showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in regions of the RJR selection. The figure shows the (a) pTℓ1 and (b) HPP3,1 distributions in SR3ℓ-Low, and the (c) pCMT ISR and (d) RISR distributions in SR3ℓ-ISR. The last bin includes overflow. The "FNP leptons" category contains backgrounds from tt̄, tW, WW and Z+jets processes. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 20b RJR SR3$\ell$-Low ($H_{3,1}^{PP}$)

Example of kinematic distributions after the background-only fit, showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in regions of the RJR selection. The figure shows the (a) pTℓ1 and (b) HPP3,1 distributions in SR3ℓ-Low, and the (c) pCMT ISR and (d) RISR distributions in SR3ℓ-ISR. The last bin includes overflow. The "FNP leptons" category contains backgrounds from tt̄, tW, WW and Z+jets processes. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 20b RJR SR3$\ell$-Low ($H_{3,1}^{PP}$)

Example of kinematic distributions after the background-only fit, showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in regions of the RJR selection. The figure shows the (a) pTℓ1 and (b) HPP3,1 distributions in SR3ℓ-Low, and the (c) pCMT ISR and (d) RISR distributions in SR3ℓ-ISR. The last bin includes overflow. The "FNP leptons" category contains backgrounds from tt̄, tW, WW and Z+jets processes. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 20c RJR SR3$\ell$-ISR ($p_{T~ISR}^{CM}$)

Example of kinematic distributions after the background-only fit, showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in regions of the RJR selection. The figure shows the (a) pTℓ1 and (b) HPP3,1 distributions in SR3ℓ-Low, and the (c) pCMT ISR and (d) RISR distributions in SR3ℓ-ISR. The last bin includes overflow. The "FNP leptons" category contains backgrounds from tt̄, tW, WW and Z+jets processes. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 20c RJR SR3$\ell$-ISR ($p_{T~ISR}^{CM}$)

Example of kinematic distributions after the background-only fit, showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in regions of the RJR selection. The figure shows the (a) pTℓ1 and (b) HPP3,1 distributions in SR3ℓ-Low, and the (c) pCMT ISR and (d) RISR distributions in SR3ℓ-ISR. The last bin includes overflow. The "FNP leptons" category contains backgrounds from tt̄, tW, WW and Z+jets processes. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 20d RJR SR3$\ell$-ISR ($R_{ISR}$)

Example of kinematic distributions after the background-only fit, showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in regions of the RJR selection. The figure shows the (a) pTℓ1 and (b) HPP3,1 distributions in SR3ℓ-Low, and the (c) pCMT ISR and (d) RISR distributions in SR3ℓ-ISR. The last bin includes overflow. The "FNP leptons" category contains backgrounds from tt̄, tW, WW and Z+jets processes. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Fig 20d RJR SR3$\ell$-ISR ($R_{ISR}$)

Example of kinematic distributions after the background-only fit, showing the data and the post-fit expected background, in regions of the RJR selection. The figure shows the (a) pTℓ1 and (b) HPP3,1 distributions in SR3ℓ-Low, and the (c) pCMT ISR and (d) RISR distributions in SR3ℓ-ISR. The last bin includes overflow. The "FNP leptons" category contains backgrounds from tt̄, tW, WW and Z+jets processes. The "Others" category contains backgrounds from Higgs and rare top processes. Distributions for wino/bino (+) χ̃1±/χ̃20 → $W\!Z$ signals are overlaid, with mass values given as (m(χ̃1±),m(χ̃10)) GeV. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the predicted yields. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties.

Tab 21 RJR Discovery Fit Table

{Results of the discovery-fit for the SRs of the RJR selection, calculated using pseudo-experiments.} The first and second column list the 95 CL upper limits on the visible cross section (σvis95) and on the number of signal events (Sobs95). The third column (Sexp95) shows the 95 CL upper limit on the number of signal events, given the expected number (and ± 1σ excursions on the expectation) of background events. The last two columns indicate the CLb value, i.e. the confidence level observed for the background-only hypothesis, and the discovery p-value (p(s = 0)). If the observed yield is below the expected yield, the p-value is capped at 0.5. vspace{0.5em}

Tab 21 RJR Discovery Fit Table

{Results of the discovery-fit for the SRs of the RJR selection, calculated using pseudo-experiments.} The first and second column list the 95 CL upper limits on the visible cross section (σvis95) and on the number of signal events (Sobs95). The third column (Sexp95) shows the 95 CL upper limit on the number of signal events, given the expected number (and ± 1σ excursions on the expectation) of background events. The last two columns indicate the CLb value, i.e. the confidence level observed for the background-only hypothesis, and the discovery p-value (p(s = 0)). If the observed yield is below the expected yield, the p-value is capped at 0.5. vspace{0.5em}

AuxFig 8a WZ Excl. Upper Limit Obs. Wino-bino(+) ($\Delta m$)