The Multiplicity dependence of inclusive p(t) spectra from p-p collisions at s**(1/2) = 200-GeV

The STAR collaboration Adams, J. ; Aggarwal, M.M. ; Ahammed, Z. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 74 (2006) 032006, 2006.
Inspire Record 719969 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.102084

We report measurements of transverse momentum $p_t$ spectra for ten event multiplicity classes of p-p collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 200$ GeV. By analyzing the multiplicity dependence we find that the spectrum shape can be decomposed into a part with amplitude proportional to multiplicity and described by a L\'evy distribution on transverse mass $m_t$, and a part with amplitude proportional to multiplicity squared and described by a gaussian distribution on transverse rapidity $y_t$. The functional forms of the two parts are nearly independent of event multiplicity. The two parts can be identified with the soft and hard components of a two-component model of p-p collisions. This analysis then provides the first isolation of the hard component of the $p_t$ spectrum as a distribution of simple form on $y_t$.

5 data tables

FIG. 1: Corrected and normalized charged-particle spectra on transverse momentum $p_t$ (left) and transverse rapidity $y_t$ (right) for 10 event multiplicity classes, displaced upward by successive factors 40 relative to $\hat{n}_{ch}$ = 1 at bottom. Solid curves represent reference function $n_s/n_{ch} · S_0(y_t)$ (cf.Sec. IV C). Dotted curves are spline fits to guide the eye.

FIG. 1: Corrected and normalized charged-particle spectra on transverse momentum $p_t$ (left) and transverse rapidity $y_t$ (right) for 10 event multiplicity classes, displaced upward by successive factors 40 relative to $\hat{n}_{ch}$ = 1 at bottom. Solid curves represent reference function $n_s/n_{ch} · S_0(y_t)$ (cf.Sec. IV C). Dotted curves are spline fits to guide the eye.

FIG. 2. Left: Relative residuals from power-law fits to $p_{t}$ spectra in Fig. 1. The hatched band represents the expected statistical errors for STAR data. Right: Exponents $n$ from power-law fits to data (solid points) and to corresponding twocomponent fixed-model functions (open circles, see Sec. VI) compared to the two-component fixed-model Lévy exponent $12.8 \pm 0.15$ (hatched band). NOTE 1: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty. NOTE 2: The "data_stat" uncertainty corresponds to the expected statistical error (hatched band).

More…

Production of e+ e- pairs accompanied by nuclear dissociation in ultra-peripheral heavy ion collision.

The STAR collaboration Adams, J. ; Aggarwal, M.M. ; Ahammed, Z. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.C 70 (2004) 031902, 2004.
Inspire Record 647869 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.98580

We present the first data on $e^+e^-$ pair production accompanied by nuclear breakup in ultra-peripheral gold-gold collisions at a center of mass energy of 200 GeV per nucleon pair. The nuclear breakup requirement selects events at small impact parameters, where higher-order corrections to the pair production cross section should be enhanced. We compare the pair kinematic distributions with two calculations: one based on the equivalent photon approximation, and the other using lowest-order quantum electrodynamics (QED): the latter includes the photon virtuality. The cross section, pair mass, rapidity and angular distributions are in good agreement with both calculations. The pair transverse momentum, $p_T$, spectrum agrees with the QED calculation, but not with the equivalent photon approach. We set limits on higher-order contributions to the cross section. The $e^+$ and $e^-$ $p_T$ spectra are similar, with no evidence for interference effects due to higher-order diagrams.

5 data tables

(a) The pair mass distribution, (b) pair $p){T}$ , (c) pair rapidity and (d) pair cos($\theta′$) distributions. The data (points) are compared with predictions from the EPA (solid histogram) and lowest-order QED (dashed histogram) calculations. The error bars include both statistical and systematic errors.

(a) The pair mass distribution, (b) pair $p){T}$ , (c) pair rapidity and (d) pair cos($\theta′$) distributions. The data (points) are compared with predictions from the EPA (solid histogram) and lowest-order QED (dashed histogram) calculations. The error bars include both statistical and systematic errors.

(a) The pair mass distribution, (b) pair $p){T}$ , (c) pair rapidity and (d) pair cos($\theta′$) distributions. The data (points) are compared with predictions from the EPA (solid histogram) and lowest-order QED (dashed histogram) calculations. The error bars include both statistical and systematic errors.

More…

Azimuthal anisotropy and correlations in the hard scattering regime at RHIC.

The STAR collaboration Adler, C. ; Ahammed, Z. ; Allgower, C. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 90 (2003) 032301, 2003.
Inspire Record 588226 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.98579

Azimuthal anisotropy ($v_2$) and two-particle angular correlations of high $p_T$ charged hadrons have been measured in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=130 GeV for transverse momenta up to 6 GeV/c, where hard processes are expected to contribute significantly. The two-particle angular correlations exhibit elliptic flow and a structure suggestive of fragmentation of high $p_T$ partons. The monotonic rise of $v_2(p_T)$ for $p_T<2$ GeV/c is consistent with collective hydrodynamical flow calculations. At $\pT>3$ GeV/c a saturation of $v_2$ is observed which persists up to $p_T=6$ GeV/c.

4 data tables

$v_{2}$($p_{T}$) for different collision centralities. The errors are statistical only. The systematic uncertainties, which are highly correlated point-to-point, are $^{+5}_{-20}%$.

$v_{2}$($p_{T}$) for minimum-bias events (circles). The error bars represent the statistical errors and the caps show the systematic uncertainty. The data are compared with hydro+pQCD calculations [9] assuming the initial gluon density $dN^{g}/dy$ = 1000 (dashed line), 500 (dotted line), and 200 (dashed-dotted line). Also shown are pure hydrodynamical calculations [16] (solid line).

High $p_{T}$ azimuthal correlation functions for central events. Upper panel: Correlation function for $|\Delta\eta|$ < 0.5 (solid circles) and scaled correlation function for 0.5 < $|\Delta\eta|$ < 1.4 (open squares). Lower panel: Difference of the two correlation functions. Also shown are the fits to the data (described in the text).

More…