Showing 10 of 2775 results
A measurement of the underlying activity in scattering processes with transverse momentum scale in the GeV region is performed in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 0.9 TeV, using data collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC. Charged hadron production is studied with reference to the direction of a leading object, either a charged particle or a set of charged particles forming a jet. Predictions of several QCD-inspired models as implemented in PYTHIA are compared, after full detector simulation, to the data. The models generally predict too little production of charged hadrons with pseudorapidity eta < 2, p_T > 0.5 GeV/c, and azimuthal direction transverse to that of the leading object.
Average multiplicity of charged particles per unit of pseudorapidity as a function of pseudorapidity for events with leading track-jet transverse momenta > 1 and > 3 GeV. Statistical errors only.
Average scalar sum of the transverse momenta of charged particles per unit of pseusdorapidity and per radian as a function of DELTA(PHI) for events with leading track-jet transverse momenta > 1 and > 2 GeV. Statistical errors only. Typical systematic error of 1.8 PCT at a leading track-jet PT of 3.5 GeV.
The average multiplicity and average scalar sum of transverse momenta of charge particles per unit of pseudorapidity and per radian as a function of the leading track transverse momenta. Statistical errors only. Typical systematic error of 1.8 PCT at a leading track-jet PT of 3.5 GeV.
The average multiplicity and average scalar sum of transverse momenta of charge particles per unit of pseudorapidity and per radian as a function of the leading track-jet transverse momenta. Statistical errors only. Typical systematic error of 1.8 PCT at a leading track-jet PT of 3.5 GeV.
The normalized multiplicity distribution (PROB) of charged particles. Statistical error only. Typical systematic error of 2.3 PCT at a multiplicity of 4.
The normalized distribution of the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of charged particles. Statistical errors only. Typical systematic error of 1.6 PCT at a SUM(PT) of 4.5 GeV.
The transverse momenta spectrum of charged particles. Statistical error only. Typical systematic error of 2.0 PCT at a PT of 1 GeV.
Differential cross sections of the reaction gamma d to K+ Sigma- (p) have been measured with the CLAS detector at Jefferson Lab using incident photons with energies between 1.1 and 3.6 GeV. This is the first complete set of strangeness photoproduction data on the neutron covering a broad angular range. At energies close to threshold and up to E_gamma ~ 1.8 GeV, the shape of the angular distribution is suggestive of the presence of s-channel production mechanisms. For E_gamma > 1.8 GeV, a clear forward peak appears and becomes more prominent as the photon energy increases, suggesting contributions from t-channel production mechanisms. These data can be used to constrain future analysis of this reaction.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.15 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.25 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.35 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.45 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.55 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.65 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.75 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.85 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 1.95 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.05 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.15 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.25 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.35 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.45 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.55 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.65 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.75 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.85 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 2.95 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.05 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.15 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.25 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.35 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.45 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA DEUT --> K+ SIGMA-(P) at incident photon energy 3.55 GeV.. Errors contain both statistics and systematics.
We present measurements of the differential cross section and Lambda recoil polarization for the gamma p to K+ Lambda reaction made using the CLAS detector at Jefferson Lab. These measurements cover the center-of-mass energy range from 1.62 to 2.84 GeV and a wide range of center-of-mass K+ production angles. Independent analyses were performed using the K+ p pi- and K+ p (missing pi -) final-state topologies/ results from these analyses were found to exhibit good agreement. These differential cross section measurements show excellent agreement with previous CLAS and LEPS results and offer increased precision and a 300 MeV increase in energy coverage. The recoil polarization data agree well with previous results and offer a large increase in precision and a 500 MeV extension in energy range. The increased center-of-mass energy range that these data represent will allow for independent study of non-resonant K+ Lambda photoproduction mechanisms at all production angles.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.62-1.63 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.63-1.64 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.64-1.65 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.65-1.66 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.66-1.67 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.67-1.68 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.68-1.69 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.69-1.7 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.7-1.71 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.71-1.72 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.72-1.73 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.73-1.74 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.74-1.75 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.75-1.76 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.76-1.77 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.77-1.78 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.78-1.79 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.79-1.8 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.8-1.81 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.81-1.82 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.82-1.83 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.83-1.84 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.84-1.85 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.85-1.86 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.86-1.87 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.87-1.88 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.88-1.89 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.89-1.9 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.9-1.91 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.91-1.92 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.92-1.93 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.93-1.94 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.94-1.95 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.96-1.97 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.97-1.98 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.98-1.99 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.99-2 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2-2.01 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.01-2.02 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.02-2.03 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.03-2.04 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.04-2.05 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.05-2.06 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.06-2.07 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.07-2.08 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.08-2.09 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.09-2.1 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.1-2.11 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.11-2.12 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.12-2.13 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.13-2.14 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.14-2.15 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.15-2.16 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.16-2.17 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.17-2.18 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.18-2.19 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.19-2.2 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.2-2.21 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.21-2.22 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.22-2.23 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.23-2.24 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.24-2.25 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.25-2.26 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.26-2.27 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.27-2.28 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.28-2.29 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.29-2.3 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.3-2.31 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.31-2.32 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.32-2.33 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.33-2.34 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.34-2.35 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.35-2.36 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.36-2.37 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.37-2.38 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.38-2.39 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.39-2.4 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.4-2.41 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.41-2.42 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.42-2.43 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.43-2.44 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.44-2.45 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.45-2.46 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.46-2.47 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.47-2.48 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.48-2.49 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.49-2.5 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.5-2.51 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.51-2.52 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.52-2.53 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.53-2.54 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.54-2.55 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.55-2.56 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.56-2.57 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.57-2.58 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.58-2.59 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.59-2.6 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.6-2.61 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.61-2.62 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.62-2.63 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.63-2.64 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.64-2.65 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.65-2.66 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.66-2.67 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.67-2.68 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.68-2.69 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.69-2.7 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.7-2.71 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.71-2.72 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.72-2.73 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.75-2.76 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.76-2.77 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.77-2.78 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.78-2.79 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.79-2.8 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.8-2.81 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.81-2.82 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.82-2.83 GeV.
Differential cross section as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.83-2.84 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.62-1.63 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.63-1.64 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.64-1.65 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.65-1.66 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.66-1.67 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.67-1.68 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.68-1.69 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.69-1.7 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.7-1.71 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.71-1.72 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.72-1.73 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.73-1.74 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.74-1.75 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.75-1.76 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.76-1.77 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.77-1.78 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.78-1.79 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.79-1.8 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.8-1.81 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.81-1.82 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.82-1.83 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.83-1.84 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.84-1.85 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.85-1.86 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.86-1.87 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.87-1.88 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.88-1.89 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.89-1.9 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.9-1.91 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.91-1.92 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.92-1.93 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.93-1.94 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.94-1.95 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.95-1.96 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.96-1.97 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.97-1.98 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.98-1.99 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 1.99-2 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2-2.01 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.01-2.02 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.02-2.03 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.03-2.04 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.04-2.05 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.05-2.06 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.06-2.07 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.07-2.08 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.08-2.09 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.09-2.1 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.1-2.11 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.11-2.12 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.12-2.13 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.13-2.14 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.14-2.15 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.15-2.16 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.16-2.17 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.17-2.18 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.18-2.19 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.19-2.2 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.2-2.21 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.21-2.22 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.22-2.23 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.23-2.24 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.24-2.25 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.25-2.26 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.26-2.27 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.27-2.28 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.28-2.29 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.29-2.3 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.3-2.31 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.31-2.32 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.32-2.33 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.33-2.34 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.34-2.35 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.35-2.36 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.36-2.37 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.37-2.38 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.38-2.39 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.39-2.4 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.4-2.41 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.41-2.42 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.42-2.43 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.43-2.44 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.44-2.45 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.45-2.46 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.46-2.47 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.47-2.48 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.48-2.49 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.49-2.5 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.5-2.51 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.51-2.52 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.52-2.53 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.53-2.54 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.54-2.55 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.55-2.56 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.56-2.57 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.57-2.58 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.58-2.59 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.59-2.6 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.6-2.61 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.61-2.62 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.62-2.63 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.63-2.64 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.64-2.65 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.65-2.66 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.66-2.67 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.67-2.68 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.68-2.69 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.69-2.7 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.7-2.71 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.71-2.72 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.72-2.73 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.73-2.74 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.74-2.75 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.75-2.76 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.76-2.77 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.77-2.78 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.78-2.79 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.79-2.8 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.8-2.81 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.81-2.82 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.82-2.83 GeV.
Polarization(LAMBDA) as a function of COS(THETA(K)) for the centre-of-mass range 2.83-2.84 GeV.
We report the measurement of the transverse momentum dependence of inclusive J/psi polarization in p+p collisions at sqrt(s)=200 GeV performed by the PHENIX Experiment at RHIC. The polarization is studied in the helicity, Gottfried-Jackson, and Collins-Soper frames for p_T < 5 GeV/c and |y| < 0.35. The J/psi polarization in the helicity and Gottfried-Jackson frames is consistent with zero for all transverse momenta, with a slight (1.8 sigma) trend towards longitudinal polarization for transverse momenta above 2 GeV/c. No conclusion is allowed due to the limited acceptance in the Collins-Soper frame and the uncertainties of the current data. The results are compared to observations for other collision systems and center of mass energies and to different quarkonia production models.
$J/\psi$ yield times dielectron branching ratio ($B$) after detector acceptance and efficiency corrections for the real data with $A$ = 28.7 $\pm$ 1.0 nb/GeV/$c$, $b$ = 3.41 $\pm$ 0.21 GeV/$c$, and $n$ = 4.6 $\pm$ 0.4.
$J/\psi$ polarization parameter ($\lambda_{J/\psi}$) versus transverse momentum ($p_T$).
$J/\psi$ polarization parameter ($\lambda_{J/\psi}$) versus transverse momentum ($p_T$).
PHENIX has measured the e^+e^- pair continuum in sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV Au+Au and p+p collisions over a wide range of mass and transverse momenta. The e^+e^- yield is compared to the expectations from hadronic sources, based on PHENIX measurements. In the intermediate mass region, between the masses of the phi and the J/psi meson, the yield is consistent with expectations from correlated c^bar-c production, though other mechanisms are not ruled out. In the low mass region (below the phi) the p+p inclusive mass spectrum is well described by known contributions from light meson decays. In contrast, the Au+Au minimum bias inclusive mass spectrum in this region shows an enhancement by a factor of 4.7+/-0.4(stat)+/-1.5(syst)+/-0.9(model) At low mass (m_ee<0.3 GeV/c^2) and high p_T (1<p_T<5 GeV/c) an enhanced e^+e^- pair yield is observed that is consistent with production of virtual direct photons. This excess is used to infer the yield of real direct photons. In central Au+Au collisions, the excess of the direct photon yield over the p+p is exponential in p_T, with inverse slope T=221+/-19(stat)+/-19(syst) MeV. Hydrodynamical models with initial temperatures ranging from T_init ~=300--600 MeV at times of 0.6--0.15 fm/c after the collision are in qualitative agreement with the direct photon data in Au+Au. For low p_T<1 GeV/c the low mass region shows a further significant enhancement that increases with centrality and has an inverse slope of T ~=100 MeV. Theoretical models under predict the low mass, low p_T enhancement.
(Color online) Inclusive mass spectrum of $e^+e^-$ pairs in the PHENIX acceptance in $p$+$p$ collisions compared to the expectations from the decays of light hadrons and correlated decays of charm, bottom, and Drell-Yan. The contribution from hadron decays is independently normalized based on meson measurements in PHENIX. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to the cocktail of known sources. The systematic uncertainties of the data are shown as boxes, while the uncertainty on the cocktail is shown as band around 1.
(Color online) Inclusive mass spectrum of $e^+e^-$ pairs in the PHENIX acceptance in minimum-bias Au+Au compared to expectations from the decays of light hadrons and correlated decays of charm, bottom, and Drell-Yan. The charm contribution expected if the dynamic correlation of $c$ and $\bar{c}$ is removed is shown separately. Statistical (bars) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately. The contribution from hadron decays is independently normalized based on meson measurements in PHENIX. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to the cocktail of known sources. The systematic uncertainties of the data are shown as boxes, while the uncertainty on the cocktail is shown as band around 1.
(Color online) Inclusive mass spectrum of $e^+e^-$ pairs in the PHENIX acceptance in minimum-bias Au+Au compared to expectations from the decays of light hadrons and correlated decays of charm, bottom, and Drell-Yan. The charm contribution expected if the dynamic correlation of $c$ and $\bar{c}$ is removed is shown separately. Statistical (bars) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately. The contribution from hadron decays is independently normalized based on meson measurements in PHENIX. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to the cocktail of known sources. The systematic uncertainties of the data are shown as boxes, while the uncertainty on the cocktail is shown as band around 1.
(Color online) Invariant mass spectrum of $e^+e^-$ pairs inclusive in $p_T$ compared to expectations from the model of hadron decays for $p$+$p$ and for different Au+Au centrality classes. The charmed meson decay contribution based on PYTHIA [55] is included in the sum of sources (solid black line). The dotted line shows the contribution from charm calculated assuming an isotropic angular distribution. Statistical (bars) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately. The systematic uncertainty on the expected hadronic sources is not shown: it ranges from ~10% in the $\pi^o$ region to ~30% in the region of the vector mesons. The uncertainty on the charm cross section, which dominates the IMR, is ~30% in both $p$+$p$ and in Au+Au collisions.
(Color online) Invariant mass spectrum of $e^+e^-$ pairs inclusive in $p_T$ compared to expectations from the model of hadron decays for $p$+$p$ and for different Au+Au centrality classes. The charmed meson decay contribution based on PYTHIA [55] is included in the sum of sources (solid black line). The dotted line shows the contribution from charm calculated assuming an isotropic angular distribution. Statistical (bars) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately. The systematic uncertainty on the expected hadronic sources is not shown: it ranges from ~10% in the $\pi^o$ region to ~30% in the region of the vector mesons. The uncertainty on the charm cross section, which dominates the IMR, is ~30% in both $p$+$p$ and in Au+Au collisions.
(Color online) Invariant mass spectrum of $e^+e^-$ pairs inclusive in $p_T$ compared to expectations from the model of hadron decays for $p$+$p$ and for different Au+Au centrality classes. The charmed meson decay contribution based on PYTHIA [55] is included in the sum of sources (solid black line). The dotted line shows the contribution from charm calculated assuming an isotropic angular distribution. Statistical (bars) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately. The systematic uncertainty on the expected hadronic sources is not shown: it ranges from ~10% in the $\pi^o$ region to ~30% in the region of the vector mesons. The uncertainty on the charm cross section, which dominates the IMR, is ~30% in both $p$+$p$ and in Au+Au collisions.
(Color online) Invariant mass spectrum of $e^+e^-$ pairs inclusive in $p_T$ compared to expectations from the model of hadron decays for $p$+$p$ and for different Au+Au centrality classes. The charmed meson decay contribution based on PYTHIA [55] is included in the sum of sources (solid black line). The dotted line shows the contribution from charm calculated assuming an isotropic angular distribution. Statistical (bars) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately. The systematic uncertainty on the expected hadronic sources is not shown: it ranges from ~10% in the $\pi^o$ region to ~30% in the region of the vector mesons. The uncertainty on the charm cross section, which dominates the IMR, is ~30% in both $p$+$p$ and in Au+Au collisions.
(Color online) Invariant mass spectrum of $e^+e^-$ pairs inclusive in $p_T$ compared to expectations from the model of hadron decays for $p$+$p$ and for different Au+Au centrality classes. The charmed meson decay contribution based on PYTHIA [55] is included in the sum of sources (solid black line). The dotted line shows the contribution from charm calculated assuming an isotropic angular distribution. Statistical (bars) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately. The systematic uncertainty on the expected hadronic sources is not shown: it ranges from ~10% in the $\pi^o$ region to ~30% in the region of the vector mesons. The uncertainty on the charm cross section, which dominates the IMR, is ~30% in both $p$+$p$ and in Au+Au collisions.
(Color online) Invariant mass spectrum of $e^+e^-$ pairs inclusive in $p_T$ compared to expectations from the model of hadron decays for $p$+$p$ and for different Au+Au centrality classes. The charmed meson decay contribution based on PYTHIA [55] is included in the sum of sources (solid black line). The dotted line shows the contribution from charm calculated assuming an isotropic angular distribution. Statistical (bars) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately. The systematic uncertainty on the expected hadronic sources is not shown: it ranges from ~10% in the $\pi^o$ region to ~30% in the region of the vector mesons. The uncertainty on the charm cross section, which dominates the IMR, is ~30% in both $p$+$p$ and in Au+Au collisions.
(Color online) Invariant mass spectrum of $e^+e^-$ pairs inclusive in $p_T$ compared to expectations from the model of hadron decays for $p$+$p$ and for different Au+Au centrality classes. The charmed meson decay contribution based on PYTHIA [55] is included in the sum of sources (solid black line). The dotted line shows the contribution from charm calculated assuming an isotropic angular distribution. Statistical (bars) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately. The systematic uncertainty on the expected hadronic sources is not shown: it ranges from ~10% in the $\pi^o$ region to ~30% in the region of the vector mesons. The uncertainty on the charm cross section, which dominates the IMR, is ~30% in both $p$+$p$ and in Au+Au collisions.
(Color online) Invariant mass spectrum of $e^+e^-$ pairs inclusive in $p_T$ compared to expectations from the model of hadron decays for $p$+$p$ and for different Au+Au centrality classes. The charmed meson decay contribution based on PYTHIA [55] is included in the sum of sources (solid black line). The dotted line shows the contribution from charm calculated assuming an isotropic angular distribution. Statistical (bars) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately. The systematic uncertainty on the expected hadronic sources is not shown: it ranges from ~10% in the $\pi^o$ region to ~30% in the region of the vector mesons. The uncertainty on the charm cross section, which dominates the IMR, is ~30% in both $p$+$p$ and in Au+Au collisions.
(Color online) Invariant mass spectrum of $e^+e^-$ pairs inclusive in $p_T$ compared to expectations from the model of hadron decays for $p$+$p$ and for different Au+Au centrality classes. The charmed meson decay contribution based on PYTHIA [55] is included in the sum of sources (solid black line). The dotted line shows the contribution from charm calculated assuming an isotropic angular distribution. Statistical (bars) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately. The systematic uncertainty on the expected hadronic sources is not shown: it ranges from ~10% in the $\pi^o$ region to ~30% in the region of the vector mesons. The uncertainty on the charm cross section, which dominates the IMR, is ~30% in both $p$+$p$ and in Au+Au collisions.
(Color online) Invariant mass spectrum of $e^+e^-$ pairs inclusive in $p_T$ compared to expectations from the model of hadron decays for $p$+$p$ and for different Au+Au centrality classes. The charmed meson decay contribution based on PYTHIA [55] is included in the sum of sources (solid black line). The dotted line shows the contribution from charm calculated assuming an isotropic angular distribution. Statistical (bars) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately. The systematic uncertainty on the expected hadronic sources is not shown: it ranges from ~10% in the $\pi^o$ region to ~30% in the region of the vector mesons. The uncertainty on the charm cross section, which dominates the IMR, is ~30% in both $p$+$p$ and in Au+Au collisions.
(Color online) Invariant mass spectrum of $e^+e^-$ pairs inclusive in $p_T$ compared to expectations from the model of hadron decays for $p$+$p$ and for different Au+Au centrality classes. The charmed meson decay contribution based on PYTHIA [55] is included in the sum of sources (solid black line). The dotted line shows the contribution from charm calculated assuming an isotropic angular distribution. Statistical (bars) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately. The systematic uncertainty on the expected hadronic sources is not shown: it ranges from ~10% in the $\pi^o$ region to ~30% in the region of the vector mesons. The uncertainty on the charm cross section, which dominates the IMR, is ~30% in both $p$+$p$ and in Au+Au collisions.
(Color online) Dielectron yield per binary collision in the mass range 1.2 to 2.8 GeV/$c^2$ as a function of $N_{part}$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown separately. Also shown are two bands corresponding to different estimates of the contribution from charmed meson decays. The width of the bands reflects the uncertainty of the charm cross section only.
(Color online) Dielectron yield per binary collision in the mass range 1.2 to 2.8 GeV/$c^2$ as a function of $N_{part}$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown separately. Also shown are two bands corresponding to different estimates of the contribution from charmed meson decays. The width of the bands reflects the uncertainty of the charm cross section only.
(Color online) Dielectron yield per participating nucleon pair ($N_{part}/2$) as function of $N_{part}$ for two different mass ranges (a: $0.15<m_{ee}<0.75$ GeV/$c^2$, b: $0<m_{ee}<0.1$ GeV/$c^2$) compared to the expected yield from the hadron decay model. The two lines give the systematic uncertainty of the yield from cocktail and charmed hadron decays. For the data statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown separately.
(Color online) Dielectron yield per participating nucleon pair ($N_{part}/2$) as function of $N_{part}$ for two different mass ranges (a: $0.15<m_{ee}<0.75$ GeV/$c^2$, b: $0<m_{ee}<0.1$ GeV/$c^2$) compared to the expected yield from the hadron decay model. The two lines give the systematic uncertainty of the yield from cocktail and charmed hadron decays. For the data statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown separately.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in $p$+$p$ (left) and minimum bias Au+Au collisions (right). The $p_T$ ranges are shown in the legend. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) Electron pair mass distribution for Au+Au (Min.Bias) for $1.0<p_T<1.5$ GeV/$c$. The two component fit is explained in the text. The fit range is $0.12<m_{ee}<0.3$ GeV/$c^2$. The dashed (black) curve at greater $m_{ee}$ shows $f(m_{ee})$ outside of the fit range.
(Color online) Electron pair mass distribution for Au+Au (Min.Bias) for $1.0<p_T<1.5$ GeV/$c$. The two component fit is explained in the text. The fit range is $0.12<m_{ee}<0.3$ GeV/$c^2$. The dashed (black) curve at greater $m_{ee}$ shows $f(m_{ee})$ outside of the fit range.
(Color online) Electron pair mass distribution for Au+Au (Min.Bias) for $1.0<p_T<1.5$ GeV/$c$. The two component fit is explained in the text. The fit range is $0.12<m_{ee}<0.3$ GeV/$c^2$. The dashed (black) curve at greater $m_{ee}$ shows $f(m_{ee})$ outside of the fit range.
(Color online) Electron pair mass distribution for Au+Au (Min.Bias) for $1.0<p_T<1.5$ GeV/$c$. The two component fit is explained in the text. The fit range is $0.12<m_{ee}<0.3$ GeV/$c^2$. The dashed (black) curve at greater $m_{ee}$ shows $f(m_{ee})$ outside of the fit range.
(Color online) Ratio R=(data-cocktail)/$f_{dir}(m_{ee})$ of electron pairs for different $p_T$ bins in Min.Bias Au+Au collisions. The $p_T$ range of each panel is indicated in the figure.
(Color online) The fraction of the direct photon component as a function of $p_T$. The error bars and the error band represent statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. The curves are from a NLO pQCD calculation (see text).
(Color online) The fraction of the direct photon component as a function of $p_T$. The error bars and the error band represent statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. The curves are from a NLO pQCD calculation (see text).
(Color online) Invariant cross section ($p$+$p$) and invariant yield (Au+Au) of direct photons as a function of $p_T$. The filled points are from this analysis and open points are from [81,82]. The three curves on the $p$+$p$ data represent NLO pQCD calculations, and the dashed curves show a modified power-law fit to the $p$+$p$ data, scaled by $T_{AA}$. The dashed (black) curves are exponential plus the $T_{AA}$ scaled $p$+$p$ fit.
(Color online) Invariant cross section ($p$+$p$) and invariant yield (Au+Au) of direct photons as a function of $p_T$. The filled points are from this analysis and open points are from [81,82]. The three curves on the $p$+$p$ data represent NLO pQCD calculations, and the dashed curves show a modified power-law fit to the $p$+$p$ data, scaled by $T_{AA}$. The dashed (black) curves are exponential plus the $T_{AA}$ scaled $p$+$p$ fit.
(Color online) Invariant cross section ($p$+$p$) and invariant yield (Au+Au) of direct photons as a function of $p_T$. The filled points are from this analysis and open points are from [81,82]. The three curves on the $p$+$p$ data represent NLO pQCD calculations, and the dashed curves show a modified power-law fit to the $p$+$p$ data, scaled by $T_{AA}$. The dashed (black) curves are exponential plus the $T_{AA}$ scaled $p$+$p$ fit.
(Color online) Invariant cross section ($p$+$p$) and invariant yield (Au+Au) of direct photons as a function of $p_T$. The filled points are from this analysis and open points are from [81,82]. The three curves on the $p$+$p$ data represent NLO pQCD calculations, and the dashed curves show a modified power-law fit to the $p$+$p$ data, scaled by $T_{AA}$. The dashed (black) curves are exponential plus the $T_{AA}$ scaled $p$+$p$ fit.
(Color online) The $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in minimum bias Au+Au collisions for the low-$p_T$ range. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) The $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in minimum bias Au+Au collisions for the low-$p_T$ range. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) The $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in minimum bias Au+Au collisions for the low-$p_T$ range. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) The $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in minimum bias Au+Au collisions for the low-$p_T$ range. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) The $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in minimum bias Au+Au collisions for the low-$p_T$ range. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) The $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in minimum bias Au+Au collisions for the low-$p_T$ range. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
(Color online) The $e^+e^-$ pair invariant mass distributions in minimum bias Au+Au collisions for the low-$p_T$ range. The solid curves represent the cocktail of hadronic sources (see Sec. IV) and include contribution from charm calculated by PYTHIA using the cross section from Ref. [48] scaled by $N_{coll}$.
Ratio of R = (data − cocktail)/$f_{dir}(m_{ee})$ for 0.8 $< p_T <$ 1.0 GeV/c in minimum bias Au$+$Au collisions. The yellow band in each panel shows $\pm1\sigma$ band of a constant fit value to the data points.
Ratio of R = (data − cocktail)/$f_{dir}(m_{ee})$ for 0.6 $< p_T <$ 0.8 GeV/c in minimum bias Au$+$Au collisions. The yellow band in each panel shows $\pm1\sigma$ band of a constant fit value to the data points.
Ratio of R = (data − cocktail)/$f_{dir}(m_{ee})$ for 0.4 $ < p_T <$ 0.6 GeV/c in minimum bias Au$+$Au collisions. The yellow band in each panel shows $\pm1\sigma$ band of a constant fit value to the data points.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). $p$$+$$p$ collision data shown.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). $p$$+$$p$ collision data shown.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). $p$$+$$p$ collision data shown.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). $p$$+$$p$ collision data shown.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). $p$$+$$p$ collision data shown.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). $p$$+$$p$ collision data shown.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). Au$+$Au collision data shown.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). Au$+$Au collision data shown.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). Au$+$Au collision data shown.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). Au$+$Au collision data shown.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). Au$+$Au collision data shown.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). Au$+$Au collision data shown.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). Au$+$Au collision data shown.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). Au$+$Au collision data shown.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). Au$+$Au collision data shown.
(Color online) $p_T$ spectra of $e^+e^-$ pairs in $p$+$p$ (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions for different mass bins, which are fully acceptance corrected. Au+Au spectra are divided by $N_{part}/2$. The solid curves show the expectations from the sum of the hadronic decay cocktail and the contribution from charmed mesons. The dashed curves show the sum of the cocktail and charmed meson contributions plus the contribution from direct photons calculated by converting the photon yield from Fig. 34 to the $e^+e^-$ pair yield using Eqs. (31) and (B14). Au$+$Au collision data shown.
The $m_{T} - m_{0}$ spectrum for the mass range 0.3 < $m_{ee}$ < 0.75 GeV/$c^{2}$ after subtracting contributions from cocktail and charm. The spectrum is fully acceptance corrected. The systematic error band includes the difference in charm yields in this mass range. The spectrum is fit to the sum of two exponential functions which are also shown separately as the dashed and dotted lines. The solid line is the sum.
Local inverse slope of the $m_{T}$ spectra of electron pairs, after subtracting the cocktail and the charm contribution, for different mass bins. The local slope is calculated in different mass ranges, 0 < $m_{T} - m_{0}$ < 0.6 GeV/$c^{2}$ and 0.6 < $m_{T} - m_{0}$ < 2.5 GeV/$c^{2}$. The solid and dashed lines show the local slope of the cocktail for the corresponding mass ranges.
Local inverse slope of the $m_{T}$ spectra of electron pairs, after subtracting the cocktail and the charm contribution, for different mass bins. The local slope is calculated in different mass ranges, 0 < $m_{T} - m_{0}$ < 0.6 GeV/$c^{2}$ and 0.6 < $m_{T} - m_{0}$ < 2.5 GeV/$c^{2}$. The solid and dashed lines show the local slope of the cocktail for the corresponding mass ranges.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au compared to predictions from Ralf Rapp. Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions in the IMR. (top left) The data are compared to the sum of cocktail+charm. The data are also compared to the sum of cocktail+charm and partonic contributions from different models. The calculations are from (center) Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83] and (right) Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85]. The partonic yields (PY) have been added to the two scenarios for charmed mesons decays, i.e. (i) $PYTHIA$ and (ii) random $c\bar{c}$ correlation.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au compared to predictions from Kevin Dusling. Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions in the IMR. (top left) The data are compared to the sum of cocktail+charm. The data are also compared to the sum of cocktail+charm and partonic contributions from different models. The calculations are from (center) Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83] and (right) Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85]. The partonic yields (PY) have been added to the two scenarios for charmed mesons decays, i.e. (i) $PYTHIA$ and (ii) random $c\bar{c}$ correlation.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au compared to predictions from Elena Bratkovskaya. Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions in the IMR. (top left) The data are compared to the sum of cocktail+charm. The data are also compared to the sum of cocktail+charm and partonic contributions from different models. The calculations are from (center) Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83] and (right) Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85]. The partonic yields (PY) have been added to the two scenarios for charmed mesons decays, i.e. (i) $PYTHIA$ and (ii) random $c\bar{c}$ correlation.
invariant mass spectrum of e+e- pairs in MB Au+Au compared to predictions from Ralf Rapp.
invariant mass spectrum of e+e- pairs in MB Au+Au compared to predictions from Ralf Rapp.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Kevin Dusling. Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in Au + Au collisions in the LMR. The data are compared to the sum of cocktail+charm (top left). The data are also compared to the sum of cocktail+charm and hadronic+partonic contributions from different models. The calculations are from The calculations are from (top right) Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83], (bottom right) Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], and Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87].
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Kevin Dusling. Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in Au + Au collisions in the LMR. The data are compared to the sum of cocktail+charm (top left). The data are also compared to the sum of cocktail+charm and hadronic+partonic contributions from different models. The calculations are from The calculations are from (top right) Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83], (bottom right) Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], and Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87].
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Elena Bratkovskaya. Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in Au + Au collisions in the LMR. The data are compared to the sum of cocktail+charm (top left). The data are also compared to the sum of cocktail+charm and hadronic+partonic contributions from different models. The calculations are from The calculations are from (top right) Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83], (bottom right) Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], and Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87].
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Elena Bratkovskaya. Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in Au + Au collisions in the LMR. The data are compared to the sum of cocktail+charm (top left). The data are also compared to the sum of cocktail+charm and hadronic+partonic contributions from different models. The calculations are from The calculations are from (top right) Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83], (bottom right) Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], and Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87].
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Ralf Rapp (0<$p_{T}$<0.5 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows compared to the expectations from the calculations of Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields and the different scenarios for the $\rho$ spectral function, namely “Hadron Many Body Theory” (HMBT) and “Dropping Mass” (DM). The calculations have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (where the contribution of the freeze-out $\rho$ meson is subtracted) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Ralf Rapp (0<$p_{T}$<0.5 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows compared to the expectations from the calculations of Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields and the different scenarios for the $\rho$ spectral function, namely “Hadron Many Body Theory” (HMBT) and “Dropping Mass” (DM). The calculations have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (where the contribution of the freeze-out $\rho$ meson is subtracted) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Ralf Rapp (0<$p_{T}$<0.5 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows compared to the expectations from the calculations of Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields and the different scenarios for the $\rho$ spectral function, namely “Hadron Many Body Theory” (HMBT) and “Dropping Mass” (DM). The calculations have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (where the contribution of the freeze-out $\rho$ meson is subtracted) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Ralf Rapp (0<$p_{T}$<0.5 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows compared to the expectations from the calculations of Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields and the different scenarios for the $\rho$ spectral function, namely “Hadron Many Body Theory” (HMBT) and “Dropping Mass” (DM). The calculations have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (where the contribution of the freeze-out $\rho$ meson is subtracted) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Kevin Dusling (0<$p_{T}$<0.5 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows compared to the expectations from the calculations of Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields. The calculations have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (where the contribution of the freeze-out $\rho$ meson is subtracted) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Kevin Dusling (0<$p_{T}$<0.5 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows compared to the expectations from the calculations of Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields. The calculations have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (where the contribution of the freeze-out $\rho$ meson is subtracted) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Kevin Dusling (0.5<$p_{T}$<1.0 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows compared to the expectations from the calculations of Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields. The calculations have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (where the contribution of the freeze-out $\rho$ meson is subtracted) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Kevin Dusling (0.5<$p_{T}$<1.0 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows compared to the expectations from the calculations of Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields. The calculations have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (where the contribution of the freeze-out $\rho$ meson is subtracted) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Kevin Dusling 1.0<$p_{T}$<1.5 GeV/$c$. Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows compared to the expectations from the calculations of Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields. The calculations have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (where the contribution of the freeze-out $\rho$ meson is subtracted) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Kevin Dusling 1.0<$p_{T}$<1.5 GeV/$c$. Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows compared to the expectations from the calculations of Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields. The calculations have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (where the contribution of the freeze-out $\rho$ meson is subtracted) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Kevin Dusling (1.5<$p_{T}$<2.0 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows compared to the expectations from the calculations of Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields. The calculations have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (where the contribution of the freeze-out $\rho$ meson is subtracted) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Kevin Dusling (1.5<$p_{T}$<2.0 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows compared to the expectations from the calculations of Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields. The calculations have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (where the contribution of the freeze-out $\rho$ meson is subtracted) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Elena Bratkovskaya (0<$p_{T}$<0.5 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows collisions compared to the expectations from the calculations of Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields calculated with different implementations of the $\rho$ spectral function, namely according to collisional broadening, with or without a dropping mass scenario. The calculations which include the dropping mass scenario have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (which is calculated by the HSD model itself) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Elena Bratkovskaya (0<$p_{T}$<0.5 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows collisions compared to the expectations from the calculations of Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields calculated with different implementations of the $\rho$ spectral function, namely according to collisional broadening, with or without a dropping mass scenario. The calculations which include the dropping mass scenario have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (which is calculated by the HSD model itself) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Elena Bratkovskaya (0<$p_{T}$<0.5 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows collisions compared to the expectations from the calculations of Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields calculated with different implementations of the $\rho$ spectral function, namely according to collisional broadening, with or without a dropping mass scenario. The calculations which include the dropping mass scenario have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (which is calculated by the HSD model itself) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Elena Bratkovskaya (0.5<$p_{T}$<1.0 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows collisions compared to the expectations from the calculations of Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields calculated with different implementations of the $\rho$ spectral function, namely according to collisional broadening, with or without a dropping mass scenario. The calculations which include the dropping mass scenario have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (which is calculated by the HSD model itself) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Elena Bratkovskaya (0.5<$p_{T}$<1.0 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows collisions compared to the expectations from the calculations of Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields calculated with different implementations of the $\rho$ spectral function, namely according to collisional broadening, with or without a dropping mass scenario. The calculations which include the dropping mass scenario have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (which is calculated by the HSD model itself) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Elena Bratkovskaya (0.5<$p_{T}$<1.0 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows collisions compared to the expectations from the calculations of Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields calculated with different implementations of the $\rho$ spectral function, namely according to collisional broadening, with or without a dropping mass scenario. The calculations which include the dropping mass scenario have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (which is calculated by the HSD model itself) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Elena Bratkovskaya (1.0<$p_{T}$<1.5 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows collisions compared to the expectations from the calculations of Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields calculated with different implementations of the $\rho$ spectral function, namely according to collisional broadening, with or without a dropping mass scenario. The calculations which include the dropping mass scenario have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (which is calculated by the HSD model itself) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Elena Bratkovskaya (1.0<$p_{T}$<1.5 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows collisions compared to the expectations from the calculations of Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields calculated with different implementations of the $\rho$ spectral function, namely according to collisional broadening, with or without a dropping mass scenario. The calculations which include the dropping mass scenario have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (which is calculated by the HSD model itself) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Elena Bratkovskaya (1.5<$p_{T}$<2.0 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows collisions compared to the expectations from the calculations of Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields calculated with different implementations of the $\rho$ spectral function, namely according to collisional broadening, with or without a dropping mass scenario. The calculations which include the dropping mass scenario have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (which is calculated by the HSD model itself) and charmed meson decays products.
Invariant mass spectrum of $e^{+}e^{-}$ pairs in MB Au+Au for different $p_{T}$ ranges compared to predictions from Elena Bratkovskaya (1.5<$p_{T}$<2.0 GeV/$c$). Invariant mass spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions for different $p_{T}$ windows collisions compared to the expectations from the calculations of Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87], separately showing the partonic and the hadronic yields calculated with different implementations of the $\rho$ spectral function, namely according to collisional broadening, with or without a dropping mass scenario. The calculations which include the dropping mass scenario have been added to the cocktail of hadronic decays (which is calculated by the HSD model itself) and charmed meson decays products.
Subtracted $p_{T}$ spectrum in 300-750 compared to calculations from Ralf Rapp. $p_{T}$ spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs for 0.3 < $m_{ee}$ < 0.75 GeV/$c^{2}$ in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions compared to the expectations from the calculations of respectively R. Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83], Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87]. The spectra are fully acceptance corrected. The curves show separately partonic and hadronic yields. For the curves of Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83] the two scenarios: Hadron Many Body Theory (HMBT) and Dropping Mass (DM) are shown. The sum is calculated with HMBT. The calculations are compared to the data from which the contributions of the cocktail of hadronic decays and charmed meson decays have been subtracted.
Subtracted $p_{T}$ spectrum in 300-750 compared to calculations from Kevin Dusling. $p_{T}$ spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs for 0.3 < $m_{ee}$ < 0.75 GeV/$c^{2}$ in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions compared to the expectations from the calculations of respectively R. Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83], Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87]. The spectra are fully acceptance corrected. The curves show separately partonic and hadronic yields. For the curves of Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83] the two scenarios: Hadron Many Body Theory (HMBT) and Dropping Mass (DM) are shown. The sum is calculated with HMBT. The calculations are compared to the data from which the contributions of the cocktail of hadronic decays and charmed meson decays have been subtracted.
Subtracted $p_{T}$ spectrum in 300-750 compared to calculations from Elena Bratkovskaya. $p_{T}$ spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs for 0.3 < $m_{ee}$ < 0.75 GeV/$c^{2}$ in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions compared to the expectations from the calculations of respectively R. Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83], Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87]. The spectra are fully acceptance corrected. The curves show separately partonic and hadronic yields. For the curves of Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83] the two scenarios: Hadron Many Body Theory (HMBT) and Dropping Mass (DM) are shown. The sum is calculated with HMBT. The calculations are compared to the data from which the contributions of the cocktail of hadronic decays and charmed meson decays have been subtracted.
Subtracted $p_{T}$ spectrum in 300-750 compared to calculations from Elena Bratkovskaya. $p_{T}$ spectra of $e^{+}e^{−}$ pairs for 0.3 < $m_{ee}$ < 0.75 GeV/$c^{2}$ in Min. Bias Au + Au collisions compared to the expectations from the calculations of respectively R. Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83], Dusling and Zahed [19, 84, 85], Cassing and Bratkovskaya [20, 27, 86, 87]. The spectra are fully acceptance corrected. The curves show separately partonic and hadronic yields. For the curves of Rapp and van Hees [15, 18, 83] the two scenarios: Hadron Many Body Theory (HMBT) and Dropping Mass (DM) are shown. The sum is calculated with HMBT. The calculations are compared to the data from which the contributions of the cocktail of hadronic decays and charmed meson decays have been subtracted.
It has been postulated that partonic orbital angular momentum can lead to a significant double-helicity dependence in the net transverse momentum of Drell-Yan dileptons produced in longitudinally polarized p+p collisions. Analogous effects are also expected for dijet production. If confirmed by experiment, this hypothesis, which is based on semi-classical arguments, could lead to a new approach for studying the contributions of orbital angular momentum to the proton spin. We report the first measurement of the double-helicity dependence of the dijet transverse momentum in longitudinally polarized p+p collisions at sqrt(s) = 200 GeV from data taken by the PHENIX experiment in 2005 and 2006. The analysis deduces the transverse momentum of the dijet from the widths of the near- and far-side peaks in the azimuthal correlation of the dihadrons. When averaged over the transverse momentum of the triggered particle, the difference of the root-mean-square of the dijet transverse momentum between like- and unlike-helicity collisions is found to be -37 +/- 88(stat) +/- 14(syst) MeV/c.
Values of derived $<z_T>$ and $\hat{x_h}$.
Helicity-averaged $\sqrt{<j^2_T>}$ and $\sqrt{<k^2_T>}$ for combined 2005 and 2006 data.
Difference in $\sqrt{<j^2_T>}$ and $\sqrt{<k^2_T>}$ for like- minus unlike-helicity combinations.
High-statistics differential cross sections for the reactions gamma p -> p eta and gamma p -> p eta-prime have been measured using the CLAS at Jefferson Lab for center-of-mass energies from near threshold up to 2.84 GeV. The eta-prime results are the most precise to date and provide the largest energy and angular coverage. The eta measurements extend the energy range of the world's large-angle results by approximately 300 MeV. These new data, in particular the eta-prime measurements, are likely to help constrain the analyses being performed to search for new baryon resonance states.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.68 to 1.69 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.69 to 1.70 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.70 to 1.71 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.71 to 1.72 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.72 to 1.73 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.73 to 1.74 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.74 to 1.75 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.75 to 1.76 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.76 to 1.77 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.77 to 1.78 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.78 to 1.79 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.79 to 1.80 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.80 to 1.81 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.81 to 1.82 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.82 to 1.83 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.83 to 1.84 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.84 to 1.85 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.85 to 1.86 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.86 to 1.87 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.87 to 1.88 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.88 to 1.89 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.89 to 1.90 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.90 to 1.91 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.91 to 1.92 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.92 to 1.93 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.93 to 1.94 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.94 to 1.95 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.96 to 1.97 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.97 to 1.98 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.98 to 1.99 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.99 to 2.00 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.00 to 2.01 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.01 to 2.02 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.02 to 2.03 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.03 to 2.04 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.04 to 2.05 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.05 to 2.06 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.06 to 2.07 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.07 to 2.08 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.08 to 2.09 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.09 to 2.10 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.10 to 2.12 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.12 to 2.14 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.14 to 2.16 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.16 to 2.18 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.18 to 2.20 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.20 to 2.22 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.22 to 2.24 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.24 to 2.26 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.26 to 2.28 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.28 to 2.30 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.30 to 2.32 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.32 to 2.34 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.34 to 2.36 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.36 to 2.40 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.40 to 2.44 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.44 to 2.48 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.48 to 2.52 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.52 to 2.56 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.56 to 2.60 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.60 to 2.64 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.64 to 2.68 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.68 to 2.73 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.75 to 2.84 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.92 to 1.93 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.93 to 1.94 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.94 to 1.95 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.96 to 1.97 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.97 to 1.98 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.98 to 1.99 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.99 to 2.00 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.00 to 2.01 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.01 to 2.02 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.02 to 2.03 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.03 to 2.04 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.04 to 2.05 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.05 to 2.06 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.06 to 2.07 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.07 to 2.08 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.08 to 2.09 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.09 to 2.10 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.10 to 2.12 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.12 to 2.14 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.14 to 2.16 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.16 to 2.18 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.18 to 2.20 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.20 to 2.22 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.22 to 2.24 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.24 to 2.26 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.26 to 2.28 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.28 to 2.30 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.30 to 2.32 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.32 to 2.34 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.34 to 2.36 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.36 to 2.40 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.40 to 2.44 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.44 to 2.48 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.48 to 2.52 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.52 to 2.56 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.56 to 2.60 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.60 to 2.64 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.64 to 2.68 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.68 to 2.73 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.75 to 2.84 GeV.
High-statistics differential cross sections and spin density matrix elements for the reaction $\gamma p \to p \omega$ have been measured using the CLAS at Jefferson Lab for center-of-mass (CM) energies from threshold up to 2.84 GeV. Results are reported in 112 10-MeV wide CM energy bins, each subdivided into $\cos{\theta_{CM}^{\omega}}$ bins of width 0.1. These are the most precise and extensive $\omega$ photoproduction measurements to date. A number of prominent structures are clearly present in the data. Many of these have not previously been observed due to limited statistics in earlier measurements.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.72 to 1.73 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.73 to 1.74 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.74 to 1.75 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.75 to 1.76 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.76 to 1.77 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.77 to 1.78 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.78 to 1.79 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.79 to 1.80 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.80 to 1.81 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.81 to 1.82 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.82 to 1.83 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.83 to 1.84 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.84 to 1.85 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.85 to 1.86 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.86 to 1.87 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.87 to 1.88 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.88 to 1.89 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.89 to 1.90 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.90 to 1.91 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.91 to 1.92 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.92 to 1.93 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.93 to 1.94 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.94 to 1.95 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.96 to 1.97 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.97 to 1.98 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.98 to 1.99 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 1.99 to 2.00 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.00 to 2.01 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.01 to 2.02 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.02 to 2.03 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.03 to 2.04 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.04 to 2.05 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.05 to 2.06 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.06 to 2.07 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.07 to 2.08 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.08 to 2.09 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.09 to 2.10 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.10 to 2.11 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.11 to 2.12 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.12 to 2.13 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.13 to 2.14 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.14 to 2.15 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.15 to 2.16 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.16 to 2.17 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.17 to 2.18 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.18 to 2.19 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.19 to 2.20 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.20 to 2.21 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.21 to 2.22 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.22 to 2.23 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.23 to 2.24 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.24 to 2.25 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.25 to 2.26 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.26 to 2.27 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.27 to 2.28 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.28 to 2.29 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.29 to 2.30 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.30 to 2.31 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.31 to 2.32 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.32 to 2.33 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.33 to 2.34 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.34 to 2.35 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.35 to 2.36 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.36 to 2.37 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.37 to 2.38 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.38 to 2.39 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.39 to 2.40 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.40 to 2.41 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.41 to 2.42 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.42 to 2.43 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.43 to 2.44 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.44 to 2.45 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.45 to 2.46 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.46 to 2.47 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.47 to 2.48 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.48 to 2.49 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.49 to 2.50 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.50 to 2.51 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.51 to 2.52 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.52 to 2.53 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.53 to 2.54 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.54 to 2.55 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.55 to 2.56 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.56 to 2.57 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.57 to 2.58 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.58 to 2.59 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.59 to 2.60 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.60 to 2.61 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.61 to 2.62 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.62 to 2.63 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.63 to 2.64 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.64 to 2.65 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.65 to 2.66 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.66 to 2.67 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.67 to 2.68 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.68 to 2.69 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.69 to 2.70 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.70 to 2.71 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.71 to 2.72 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.72 to 2.73 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.75 to 2.76 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.76 to 2.77 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.77 to 2.78 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.78 to 2.79 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.79 to 2.80 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.80 to 2.81 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.81 to 2.82 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.82 to 2.83 GeV.
Differential cross section for the W range 2.83 to 2.84 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.72 to 1.73 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.73 to 1.74 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.74 to 1.75 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.75 to 1.76 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.76 to 1.77 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.77 to 1.78 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.78 to 1.79 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.79 to 1.80 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.80 to 1.81 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.81 to 1.82 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.82 to 1.83 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.83 to 1.84 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.84 to 1.85 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.85 to 1.86 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.86 to 1.87 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.87 to 1.88 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.88 to 1.89 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.89 to 1.90 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.90 to 1.91 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.91 to 1.92 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.92 to 1.93 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.93 to 1.94 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.94 to 1.95 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.95 to 1.96 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.96 to 1.97 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.97 to 1.98 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.98 to 1.99 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 1.99 to 2.00 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.00 to 2.01 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.01 to 2.02 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.02 to 2.03 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.03 to 2.04 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.04 to 2.05 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.05 to 2.06 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.06 to 2.07 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.07 to 2.08 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.08 to 2.09 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.09 to 2.10 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.10 to 2.11 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.11 to 2.12 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.12 to 2.13 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.13 to 2.14 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.14 to 2.15 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.15 to 2.16 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.16 to 2.17 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.17 to 2.18 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.18 to 2.19 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.19 to 2.20 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.20 to 2.21 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.21 to 2.22 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.22 to 2.23 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.23 to 2.24 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.24 to 2.25 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.25 to 2.26 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.26 to 2.27 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.27 to 2.28 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.28 to 2.29 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.29 to 2.30 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.30 to 2.31 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.31 to 2.32 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.32 to 2.33 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.33 to 2.34 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.34 to 2.35 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.35 to 2.36 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.36 to 2.37 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.37 to 2.38 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.38 to 2.39 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.39 to 2.40 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.40 to 2.41 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.41 to 2.42 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.42 to 2.43 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.43 to 2.44 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.44 to 2.45 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.45 to 2.46 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.46 to 2.47 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.47 to 2.48 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.48 to 2.49 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.49 to 2.50 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.50 to 2.51 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.51 to 2.52 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.52 to 2.53 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.53 to 2.54 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.54 to 2.55 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.55 to 2.56 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.56 to 2.57 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.57 to 2.58 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.58 to 2.59 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.59 to 2.60 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.60 to 2.61 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.61 to 2.62 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.62 to 2.63 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.63 to 2.64 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.64 to 2.65 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.65 to 2.66 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.66 to 2.67 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.67 to 2.68 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.68 to 2.69 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.69 to 2.70 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.70 to 2.71 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.71 to 2.72 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.72 to 2.73 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.73 to 2.74 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.74 to 2.75 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.75 to 2.76 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.76 to 2.77 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.77 to 2.78 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.78 to 2.79 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.79 to 2.80 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.80 to 2.81 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.81 to 2.82 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.82 to 2.83 GeV.
Spin density matrix elements for the W range 2.83 to 2.84 GeV.
We present the first measurements at a hadron collider of differential cross sections for Z+jet+X production in delta phi(Z, jet), |delta y(Z, jet)| and |y_boost(Z, jet)|. Vector boson production in association with jets is an excellent probe of QCD and constitutes the main background to many small cross section processes, such as associated Higgs production. These measurements are crucial tests of the predictions of perturbative QCD and current event generators, which have varied success in describing the data. Using these measurements as inputs in tuning event generators will increase the experimental sensitivity to rare signals.
Differential cross section in bins of PHI(P=3)-PHI(P=4) for Z/GAMMA* transverse momentum > 25 GeV.
Differential cross section in bins of PHI(P=3)-PHI(P=4) for Z/GAMMA* transverse momentum > 45 GeV.
Differential cross section in bins of ABS(YRAP(P=3)-YRAP(P=4)) for Z/GAMMA* transverse momentum > 25 GeV.
Differential cross section in bins of ABS(YRAP(P=3)-YRAP(P=4)) for Z/GAMMA* transverse momentum > 45 GeV.
Differential cross section in bins of ABS(YRAP(P=3)+YRAP(P=4))/2 for Z/GAMMA* transverse momentum > 25 GeV.
Differential cross section in bins of ABS(YRAP(P=3)+YRAP(P=4))/2 for Z/GAMMA* transverse momentum > 45 GeV.
Individual percentage contributions to the systematic error for the binning in PHI(P=3)-PHI(P=4) for Z/GAMMA* transverse momentum > 25 GeV.
Individual percentage contributions to the systematic error for the binning in PHI(P=3)-PHI(P=4) for Z/GAMMA* transverse momentum > 45 GeV.
Individual percentage contributions to the systematic error for the binning in ABS(YRAP(P=3)-YRAP(P=4)) for Z/GAMMA* transverse momentum > 25 GeV.
Individual percentage contributions to the systematic error for the binning in ABS(YRAP(P=3)-YRAP(P=4)) for Z/GAMMA* transverse momentum > 45 GeV.
Individual percentage contributions to the systematic error for the binning in ABS(YRAP(P=3)+YRAP(P=4))/2 for Z/GAMMA* transverse momentum > 25 GeV.
Individual percentage contributions to the systematic error for the binning in ABS(YRAP(P=3)+YRAP(P=4))/2 for Z/GAMMA* transverse momentum > 45 GeV.
The exclusive reaction $\gamma p \to p \pi^+ \pi^-$ was studied in the photon energy range 3.0 - 3.8 GeV and momentum transfer range $0.4<-t<1.0$ GeV$^2$. Data were collected with the CLAS detector at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility. In this kinematic range the integrated luminosity was about 20 pb$^{-1}$. The reaction was isolated by detecting the $\pi^+$ and proton in CLAS, and reconstructing the $\pi^-$ via the missing-mass technique. Moments of the di-pion decay angular distributions were derived from the experimental data. Differential cross sections for the $S$, $P$, and $D$-waves in the $M_{\pi^+\pi^-}$ mass range $0.4-1.4$ GeV were derived performing a partial wave expansion of the extracted moments. Besides the dominant contribution of the $\rho(770)$ meson in the $P$-wave, evidence for the $f_0(980)$ and the $f_2(1270)$ mesons was found in the $S$ and $D$-waves, respectively. The differential production cross sections $d\sigma/dt$ for individual waves in the mass range of the above-mentioned mesons were extracted. This is the first time the $f_0(980)$ has been measured in a photoproduction experiment.
Moments YLM(LM=00) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=00) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=00) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=00) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=00) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=00) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=10) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=10) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=10) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=10) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=10) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=10) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=11) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=11) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=11) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=11) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=11) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=11) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=20) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=20) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=20) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=20) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=20) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=20) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=21) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=21) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=21) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=21) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=21) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=21) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=22) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=22) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=22) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=22) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=22) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=22) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=30) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=30) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=30) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=30) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=30) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=30) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=31) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=31) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=31) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=31) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=31) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=31) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=32) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=32) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=32) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=32) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=32) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=32) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=33) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=33) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=33) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=33) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=33) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=33) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=40) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=40) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=40) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=40) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=40) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=40) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=41) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=41) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=41) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=41) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=41) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=41) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=42) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=42) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=42) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=42) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=42) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=42) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=43) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=43) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=43) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=43) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=43) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=43) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=44) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=44) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=44) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=44) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=44) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
Moments YLM(LM=44) of the di-pion angular distribution for -T.
S wave cross section for -T.
S wave cross section for -T.
S wave cross section for -T.
S wave cross section for -T.
S wave cross section for -T.
S wave cross section for -T.
P wave cross section for -T.
P wave cross section for -T.
P wave cross section for -T.
P wave cross section for -T.
P wave cross section for -T.
P wave cross section for -T.
Pm wave cross section for -T.
Pm wave cross section for -T.
Pm wave cross section for -T.
Pm wave cross section for -T.
Pm wave cross section for -T.
Pm wave cross section for -T.
P0 wave cross section for -T.
P0 wave cross section for -T.
P0 wave cross section for -T.
P0 wave cross section for -T.
P0 wave cross section for -T.
P0 wave cross section for -T.
Pp wave cross section for -T.
Pp wave cross section for -T.
Pp wave cross section for -T.
Pp wave cross section for -T.
Pp wave cross section for -T.
Pp wave cross section for -T.
D wave cross section for -T.
D wave cross section for -T.
D wave cross section for -T.
D wave cross section for -T.
D wave cross section for -T.
D wave cross section for -T.
Dm wave cross section for -T.
Dm wave cross section for -T.
Dm wave cross section for -T.
Dm wave cross section for -T.
Dm wave cross section for -T.
Dm wave cross section for -T.
D0 wave cross section for -T.
D0 wave cross section for -T.
D0 wave cross section for -T.
D0 wave cross section for -T.
D0 wave cross section for -T.
D0 wave cross section for -T.
Dp wave cross section for -T.
Dp wave cross section for -T.
Dp wave cross section for -T.
Dp wave cross section for -T.
Dp wave cross section for -T.
Dp wave cross section for -T.
F wave cross section for -T.
F wave cross section for -T.
F wave cross section for -T.
F wave cross section for -T.
F wave cross section for -T.
F wave cross section for -T.
Fm wave cross section for -T.
Fm wave cross section for -T.
Fm wave cross section for -T.
Fm wave cross section for -T.
Fm wave cross section for -T.
Fm wave cross section for -T.
F0 wave cross section for -T.
F0 wave cross section for -T.
F0 wave cross section for -T.
F0 wave cross section for -T.
F0 wave cross section for -T.
F0 wave cross section for -T.
Fp wave cross section for -T.
Fp wave cross section for -T.
Fp wave cross section for -T.
Fp wave cross section for -T.
Fp wave cross section for -T.
Fp wave cross section for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the P-wave for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the interference between the S- and P-waves for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the interference between the S- and P-waves for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the interference between the S- and P-waves for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the interference between the S- and P-waves for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the interference between the S- and P-waves for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the interference between the S- and P-waves for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the interference between the S- and P-waves for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the interference between the S- and P-waves for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the interference between the S- and P-waves for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the interference between the S- and P-waves for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the interference between the S- and P-waves for -T.
Spin density matrix elements for the interference between the S- and P-waves for -T.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance on the query string syntax can also be found in the OpenSearch documentation.
We support searching for a range of records using their HEPData record ID or Inspire ID.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.