direct $\gamma$-hadron yields per trigger p+p and Au+Au at 12<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<15 GeV/c.

direct $\gamma$-hadron yields per trigger p+p and Au+Au at 5<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<7 GeV/c.

direct $\gamma$-hadron yields per trigger p+p and Au+Au at 7<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<9 GeV/c.

direct $\gamma$-hadron yields per trigger p+p and Au+Au at 9<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<12 GeV/c.

direct $\gamma$-hadron yields per trigger p+p and Au+Au at 12<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<15 GeV/c.

direct $\gamma$-hadron yields per trigger p+p and Au+Au at 5<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<7 GeV/c.

direct $\gamma$-hadron yields per trigger p+p and Au+Au at 7<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<9 GeV/c.

direct $\gamma$-hadron yields per trigger p+p and Au+Au at 9<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<12 GeV/c.

direct $\gamma$-hadron yields per trigger p+p and Au+Au at 12<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<15 GeV/c.

Ratio of $I_{AA}$ of Au+Au to p+p yields at 5<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<7 GeV/c.

Ratio of $I_{AA}$ of Au+Au to p+p yields at 7<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<9 GeV/c.

Ratio of $I_{AA}$ of Au+Au to p+p yields at 9<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<12 GeV/c.

Ratio of $I_{AA}$ of Au+Au to p+p yields at 12<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<15 GeV/c.

$I_{AA}(Z_T)$ for the 20% most central Au+Au data at 5<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<7 GeV/c compared to predictions from an energy loss calculation.

$I_{AA}(Z_T)$ for the 20% most central Au+Au data at 7<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<9 GeV/c compared to predictions from an energy loss calculation.

$I_{AA}(Z_T)$ for the 20% most central Au+Au data at 9<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<12 GeV/c compared to predictions from an energy loss calculation.

$I_{AA}(Z_T)$ for the 20% most central Au+Au data at 12<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<15 GeV/c compared to predictions from an energy loss calculation.

direct $\gamma$-hadron yields per trigger p+p at 5<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<7 GeV/c.

direct $\gamma$-hadron yields per trigger p+p at 7<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<9 GeV/c.

direct $\gamma$-hadron yields per trigger p+p at 9<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<12 GeV/c.

direct $\gamma$-hadron yields per trigger p+p at 12<$p_{T}^{\gamma}$<15 GeV/c.

Away-side charged hadron yield per π 0 trigger as a function of xE, which is equivalent to zT in the collinear limit cos(∆φ) = 1 & Away-side isolated direct photon trigger as a function of xE, which is equivalent to zT in the collinear limit cos(∆φ) = 1.

Away-side charged hadron yield per π 0 trigger as a function of xE, which is equivalent to zT in the collinear limit cos(∆φ) = 1 & Away-side isolated direct photon trigger as a function of xE, which is equivalent to zT in the collinear limit cos(∆φ) = 1.

Away-side charged hadron yield per π 0 trigger as a function of xE, which is equivalent to zT in the collinear limit cos(∆φ) = 1.

Away-side isolated direct photon trigger as a function of xE, which is equivalent to zT in the collinear limit cos(∆φ) = 1.

Away-side charged hadron yield per π 0 trigger as a function of xE, which is equivalent to zT in the collinear limit cos(∆φ) = 1 & Away-side isolated direct photon trigger as a function of xE, which is equivalent to zT in the collinear limit cos(∆φ) = 1.

Away-side charged hadron yield per π 0 trigger as a function of xE, which is equivalent to zT in the collinear limit cos(∆φ) = 1.

Away-side isolated direct photon trigger as a function of xE, which is equivalent to zT in the collinear limit cos(∆φ) = 1.

Parameters of the Tsallis fit with parameter $n$ constrained to a fixed linear dependence on mass (for mesons). Cross sections are in $\mu$b for $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ and in mb for all other particles.

Constant and linear fits to the Tsallis parameter $T$ of mesons with fixed parameter $n$. The last column (Prob.) gives the probability estimated by the $\chi^2$/$n.d.f.$ of the fit.

Parameters of the Tsallis fit with Eq. 8 in the paper with parameters $n$ and $T$ constrained to have a fixed linear dependence on mass (for mesons). Cross sections are in $\mu$b for $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ and in mb for all other particles.

Cross sections in mb and $<p_T>$ in GeV/$c$ of different particles in $p$+$p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV. PHENIX columns show the values obtained by fits to the experiment spectra with the Tsallis functional form as described in the text. One should state explicitly that these values do not supersede values given in the ”Published” column by the experiments, in their publications listed in the last column, or elsewhere. An additional 9.7% systematic uncertainty should be added to all $d\sigma$/$dy$ values listed in the column “PHENIX” to account for the trigger uncertainties. Values in the column “Published” are also given without these systematic uncertainties. The column “S.M.” is the prediction of the statistical model discussed in the text. The characteristic widths of the particle spectra are $\langle p_T \rangle$ for all species except for $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ for which the values given in the Table are $\langle p_T^2 \rangle$. For $\psi^{\prime}$ the integration is done in the $p_T$ regionbelow 5 GeV/$c$. All errors are the combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Cross sections in mb and $<p_T>$ in GeV/$c$ of different particles in $p$+$p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV. PHENIX columns show the values obtained by fits to the experiment spectra with the Tsallis functional form as described in the text. One should state explicitly that these values do not supersede values given in the ”Published” column by the experiments, in their publications listed in the last column, or elsewhere. An additional 9.7% systematic uncertainty should be added to all $d\sigma$/$dy$ values listed in the column “PHENIX” to account for the trigger uncertainties. Values in the column “Published” are also given without these systematic uncertainties. The column “S.M.” is the prediction of the statistical model discussed in the text. The characteristic widths of the particle spectra are $\langle p_T \rangle$ for all species except for $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ for which the values given in the Table are $\langle p_T^2 \rangle$. For $\psi^{\prime}$ the integration is done in the $p_T$ regionbelow 5 GeV/$c$. All errors are the combined statistical and systematic uncertainties.

The invariant differential cross section ${d^2 \sigma}$/${2\pi p_T dy p_T}$ of $\omega$ meson production measured in the indicated decay channel. Type A uncertainties are $p_T$ independent. Type C & B systematic uncertainties are residual with Type B having an unknown $p_T$ dependence. For each $y$-coordinate in each $p_T$ bin was varied by the same amount according to the uncertainty Type C.

The invariant differential cross section ${d^2 \sigma}$/${2\pi p_T dy p_T}$ of $\omega$ meson production measured in the indicated decay channel. Type A uncertainties are $p_T$ independent. Type C & B systematic uncertainties are residual with Type B having an unknown $p_T$ dependence. For each $y$-coordinate in each $p_T$ bin was varied by the same amount according to the uncertainty Type C.

The invariant differential cross section ${d^2 \sigma}$/${2\pi p_T dy p_T}$ of $\omega$ meson production measured in the indicated decay channel. Type A uncertainties are $p_T$ independent. Type C & B systematic uncertainties are residual with Type B having an unknown $p_T$ dependence. For each $y$-coordinate in each $p_T$ bin was varied by the same amount according to the uncertainty Type C.

The invariant differential cross section ${d^2 \sigma}$/${2\pi p_T dy p_T}$ of $\omega$ meson production measured in the indicated decay channel. Type A uncertainties are $p_T$ independent. Type C & B systematic uncertainties are residual with Type B having an unknown $p_T$ dependence. For each $y$-coordinate in each $p_T$ bin was varied by the same amount according to the uncertainty Type C.

The invariant differential cross section ${d^2 \sigma}$/${2\pi p_T dy p_T}$ of $\omega$ meson production measured in the indicated decay channel. Type A uncertainties are $p_T$ independent. Type C & B systematic uncertainties are residual with Type B having an unknown $p_T$ dependence. For each $y$-coordinate in each $p_T$ bin was varied by the same amount according to the uncertainty Type C.

The invariant differential cross section ${d^2 \sigma}$/${2\pi p_T dy p_T}$ of $\omega$ meson production measured in the indicated decay channel. Type A uncertainties are $p_T$ independent. Type C & B systematic uncertainties are residual with Type B having an unknown $p_T$ dependence. For each $y$-coordinate in each $p_T$ bin was varied by the same amount according to the uncertainty Type C.

The invariant differential cross section ${d^2 \sigma}$/${2\pi p_T dy p_T}$ of $\omega$ meson production measured in the indicated decay channel. Type A uncertainties are $p_T$ independent. Type C & B systematic uncertainties are residual with Type B having an unknown $p_T$ dependence. For each $y$-coordinate in each $p_T$ bin was varied by the same amount according to the uncertainty Type C.

Measured $\pi^0$ $R_{AA}$ as a function of $p_T$ for the 0-10% most central collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 22.4 GeV in comparison to a jet quenching calculation. The error (tot.) includes the quadratic sum of the statistical uncertainties and the point-to-point uncorrelated and correlated systematic uncertainties.

Measured $\pi^0$ $R_{AA}$ as a function of $p_T$ for the 0-10% most central collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV in comparison to a jet quenching calculation. The error (tot.) includes the quadratic sum of the statistical uncertainties and the point-to-point uncorrelated and correlated systematic uncertainties.

Measured $\pi^0$ $R_{AA}$ as a function of $p_T$ for the 0-10% most central collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200.0 GeV in comparison to a jet quenching calculation. The error (tot.) includes the quadratic sum of the statistical uncertainties and the point-to-point uncorrelated and correlated systematic uncertainties.

The average $R_{AA}$ in the interval 2.5 < $p_T$ < 3.5 GeV/$c$ as a function of centrality for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 22.4 GeV. The error (sys.) includes the normalization and $<N_{coll}>$ uncertainties for a typical $N_{coll}$ uncertainty of 12%.

The average $R_{AA}$ in the interval 2.5 < $p_T$ < 3.5 GeV/$c$ as a function of centrality for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV. The error (sys.) includes the normalization and $<N_{coll}>$ uncertainties for a typical $N_{coll}$ uncertainty of 12%.

The average $R_{AA}$ in the interval 2.5 < $p_T$ < 3.5 GeV/$c$ as a function of centrality for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The error (sys.) includes the normalization and $<N_{coll}>$ uncertainties for a typical $N_{coll}$ uncertainty of 12%.

ETA ASYM(LL) measurements from 2005.

ETA ASYM(LL) measurements from 2006.

ETA ASYM(LL) measurements from 2009.

Combined PI0 ASYM(LL) values from the PHENIX data sets at sqrt(s) = 200 GeV.

Combined ETA ASYM(LL) values from the PHENIX data sets at sqrt(s) = 200 GeV.

The best fit value of the gluon polarization where the uncertainty is that at a chi-squared value of 9 when considering only statistical experimental uncertainties.

$R_{AA}$ for $\phi$ integrated at $p_T$ > 2.2 GeV/$c$ in Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions vs. $N_{part}$. The global uncertainty related to the $p$+$p$ reference normalization is shown as a box on the right in the figure from the paper.

$R_{AA}$ for $\phi$ integrated at $p_T$ > 2.2 GeV/$c$ in Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions vs. $N_{part}$. The global uncertainty related to the $p$+$p$ reference normalization is shown as a box on the right in the figure from the paper.

$R_{dA}$ vs. $p_T$ for $\phi$, $\pi^0$, and ($p$+$\bar{p}$) for 0-20% centrality $d$+Au collisions, and $R_{dA}$ vs. $p_T$ for $\phi$, $\pi^0$, and ($p$+$\bar{p}$) for 60-88% peripheral $d$+Au collisions. The global uncertainty of ~ 10% related to the $p$+$p$ reference normalization is not shown.

Measured $v_2$ ($p_T$) for identified (anti)protons, each charged combined, 0-5% central $d$+Au collisions at RHIC.

Invariant yield of negatively charged heavy-flavor muons as a function of $p_T$ in $d$+Au collisions for different centralities at (a) backward rapidity (Au-going) and (b) forward rapidity (d-going).

Invariant yield of negatively charged heavy-flavor muons as a function of $p_T$ in $d$+Au collisions for different centralities at (a) backward rapidity (Au-going) and (b) forward rapidity (d-going).

The nuclear modification factor $R_{dA}$, for negatively charged heavy-flavor muons in $d$+Au collisions.

The nuclear modification factor $R_{dA}$, for negatively charged heavy-flavor muons in $d$+Au collisions.

The nuclear modification factor $R_{dA}$, for negatively charged heavy-flavor muons in $d$+Au collisions.

The nuclear modification factor $R_{dA}$, for negatively charged heavy-flavor muons in $d$+Au collisions.

The nuclear modification factor $R_{dA}$, for negatively charged heavy-flavor muons in $d$+Au collisions.

Comparison of $R_{dA}$ as a function of $\langle N_{coll} \rangle$ for heavy-flavor leptons from different rapidity and $p_T$ bins.

Comparison of $R_{dA}$ as a function of $\langle N_{coll} \rangle$ for heavy-flavor leptons from different rapidity and $p_T$ bins.

Heavy flavor muon double differential cross section in $p$+$p$ collisions at 1.4 < $|y|$ < 2.0.

Invariant transverse momentum spectra of $\omega$ production in $p$+$p$ and $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=200 GeV.

Invariant transverse momentum spectra of $\omega$ production in $p$+$p$ and $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=200 GeV.

Invariant transverse momentum spectra of $\omega$ production in Cu+Cu (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions from the $\omega \rightarrow \pi^0 \gamma$ decay channel for three centrality bins and minimum bias.

Invariant transverse momentum spectra of $\omega$ production in Cu+Cu (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions from the $\omega \rightarrow \pi^0 \gamma$ decay channel for three centrality bins and minimum bias.

Invariant transverse momentum spectra of $\omega$ production in Cu+Cu (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions from the $\omega \rightarrow \pi^0 \gamma$ decay channel for three centrality bins and minimum bias.

Invariant transverse momentum spectra of $\omega$ production in Cu+Cu (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions from the $\omega \rightarrow \pi^0 \gamma$ decay channel for three centrality bins and minimum bias.

Invariant transverse momentum spectra of $\omega$ production in Cu+Cu (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions from the $\omega \rightarrow \pi^0 \gamma$ decay channel for three centrality bins and minimum bias.

Invariant transverse momentum spectra of $\omega$ production in Cu+Cu (left) and Au+Au (right) collisions from the $\omega \rightarrow \pi^0 \gamma$ decay channel for three centrality bins and minimum bias.

Measured ${\omega}/{\pi}$ ratio as a function of $p_T$ in $p$ + $p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=200 GeV.

Measured ${\omega}/{\pi}$ ratio as a function of $p_T$ in $p$ + $p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=200 GeV.

Measured ${\omega}/{\pi}$ ratio as a function of $p_T$ in $p$ + $p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=200 GeV.

${\omega}/{\pi}$ ratio versus transverse momentum in $d$+Au (0–88%) for $\omega \rightarrow {e}^{+}{e}^{-}$.

${\omega}/{\pi}$ ratio versus transverse momentum in $d$+Au (0–88%) for $\omega \rightarrow {\pi}^{+}{\pi}^{-}\pi^0$.

${\omega}/{\pi}$ ratio versus transverse momentum in $d$+Au (0–88%) for $\omega \rightarrow {\pi}^{0}\gamma$.

${\omega}/{\pi}$ ratio versus transverse momentum in Cu+Cu (0–94%) for $\omega \rightarrow {\pi}^{0}\gamma$.

${\omega}/{\pi}$ ratio versus transverse momentum in Au+Au (0–92%) for $\omega \rightarrow {\pi}^{0}\gamma$.

${\omega}/{\pi}$ ratio versus transverse momentum in Au+Au (0–92%) for $\omega \rightarrow {\pi}^{0}\gamma$.

Nuclear modification factor, RdAu, measured for the ${R}_{dAu}$ in 0–88, 0–20, 20-40, and 40-60% centrality bins in $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=200 GeV.

Nuclear modification factor, RdAu, measured for the ${R}_{dAu}$ in 60–88% centrality bins in $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=200 GeV.

Nuclear modification factor, RdAu, measured for the ${R}_{dAu}$ in 0–88, 20-40, and 40–60% centrality bins in $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=200 GeV.

Nuclear modification factor, RdAu, measured for the ${R}_{dAu}$ in 0–20 and 60–88% centrality bins in $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=200 GeV.

Nuclear modification factor, RdAu, measured for the ${R}_{dAu}$ in 0–88, 0–20, 20-40, 40-60, and 60–88% centrality bins in $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=200 GeV.

$R_{AA}$ of the $\omega$ in Cu+Cu collisions from the $\omega \rightarrow \pi^0\gamma$ decay channel.

$R_{AA}$ of the $\omega$ in Au+Au collisions from the $\omega \rightarrow \pi^0 \gamma$ decay channel.

$R_{AA}$ of the $\omega$ in Au+Au collisions from the $\omega \rightarrow \pi^0 \gamma$ decay channel.

$R_{AA}$ of the $\omega$ in Au+Au collisions from the $\omega \rightarrow \pi^0 \gamma$ decay channel.

$R_{AA}$ of the $\omega$ in Au+Au collisions from the $\omega \rightarrow \pi^0 \gamma$ decay channel.

$R_{AA}$ of the $\omega$ in and Au+Au collisions from the $\omega \rightarrow \pi^0 \gamma$ decay channel.

($R_{AA}$) of the $\omega \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ collision for the $\omega$ meson integrated over the range $p_T$ > 7 $\mathrm{GeV}$/$c$ as a function of the number participating nucleons ($N_{part}$).

($R_{AA}$) of the $\omega \rightarrow \pi^0 \gamma$ collision for the $\omega$ meson integrated over the range $p_T$ > 7 $\mathrm{GeV}$/$c$ as a function of the number participating nucleons ($N_{part}$).

$R_{AA}$ of the $\omega \rightarrow \pi^0 \gamma$ collision for the $\omega$ meson integrated over the range $p_T$ > 7 $\mathrm{GeV}$/$c$ as a function of the number participating nucleons ($N_{part}$).

Direct photon spectra(Nucl. Part. Phys. 23, A1 (1997)) normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in p+p at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 63 GeV.

Direct photon spectra(Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 51, 836 (1990)) normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in p+p at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 63 GeV.

Direct photon spectra normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 62.4 GeV.

Direct photon spectra normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 39.0 GeV.

Direct photon spectra(Physical Review C91, 064904 (2015)) normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV.

Direct photon spectra(Physical Review Letters 104, 132301 (2010)) normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV.

Direct photon spectra(Physical Review Letters 109, 152302 (2012)) normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV.

Direct photon spectra(Physical Review C98, 054902 (2018)) normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV.

Direct photon spectra(Physics Letters B754 235 (2016)) normalized by $(dN_{ch}/d\eta)^{1.25}$ for in Pb+Pb at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 2760 GeV.

Number of binary collisions N_{coll} vs. Charged particle multiplicity in Au+Au at various cm energies.

Charged particle multiplicity vs. centrality in Au+Au at various cm energies.

Number of binary collisions N_{coll} vs. centrality in Au+Au at various cm energies.

Integrated direct photon yield vs. Charged particle multiplicity in various systems at various cm energies.

Charged particle multiplicity vs. centrality in various systems at various cm energies.

Integrated direct photon yield vs. centrality in various systems at various cm energies.

Integrated direct photon yield vs. Charged particle multiplicity in various systems at various cm energies.

Charged particle multiplicity vs. centrality in various systems at various cm energies.

Integrated direct photon yield vs. centrality in various systems at various cm energies.

The experimental sensitivity and observed limit on the number of dark photon candidates as a function of the assumed dark photon mass.

Limits on the $U-\gamma$ mixing parameters from PHENIX at 90%, 85% and 80% confidence levels.

Direct photon cross section. (a) The invariant cross sections of the direct photon in $p+p$ [3, 4] and $d$+Au collisions. The $p+p$ fit result with the empirical parameterization described in the text is shown as well as NLO pQCD calculations, and the scaled $p+p$ fit is compared with the $d$+Au data. The closed and open symbols show the results from the virtual photon and $\pi_{0}$-tagging methods, respectively. The asterisk symbols show the result from the statistical subtraction method for $d$+Au data, overlapping with the virtual photon result in 3 < $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/c. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. (b) The $p+p$ data over the fit. The uncertainties of the fit due to both point-to-point (ptp.) and pT -correlated uncertainties of the data are summed quadratically, and the sum is shown as dotted lines. The NLO pQCD calculations divided by the fit are also shown.

Direct photon cross section. (a) The invariant cross sections of the direct photon in $p+p$ [3, 4] and $d$+Au collisions. The $p+p$ fit result with the empirical parameterization described in the text is shown as well as NLO pQCD calculations, and the scaled $p+p$ fit is compared with the $d$+Au data. The closed and open symbols show the results from the virtual photon and $\pi_{0}$-tagging methods, respectively. The asterisk symbols show the result from the statistical subtraction method for $d$+Au data, overlapping with the virtual photon result in 3 < $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/c. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. (b) The $p+p$ data over the fit. The uncertainties of the fit due to both point-to-point (ptp.) and pT -correlated uncertainties of the data are summed quadratically, and the sum is shown as dotted lines. The NLO pQCD calculations divided by the fit are also shown.

(a) The invariant cross sections of the direct photon in $p+p$ [3, 4] and $d$+Au collisions. The $p+p$ fit result with the empirical parameterization described in the text is shown as well as NLO pQCD calculations, and the scaled $p+p$ fit is compared with the $d$+Au data. The closed and open symbols show the results from the virtual photon and $\pi_{0}$-tagging methods, respectively. The asterisk symbols show the result from the statistical subtraction method for $d$+Au data, overlapping with the virtual photon result in 3 < $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/c. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. (b) The $p+p$ data over the fit. The uncertainties of the fit due to both point-to-point (ptp.) and pT -correlated uncertainties of the data are summed quadratically, and the sum is shown as dotted lines. The NLO pQCD calculations divided by the fit are also shown.

$R_{dA}$ ($d$+Au data/scaled $p+p$ fit). Nuclear modification factor for $d$+Au, $R_{dA}$, as a function of $p_{T}$ . The closed and open symbols show the results from the virtual- and real-photon measurements, respectively. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. The box on the right shows the uncertainty of $T_{dA}$ for $d$+Au. The curves indicate the theoretical calculations [24] with different combinations of the CNM effects such as the Cronin enhancement, isospin effect, nuclear shadowing and initial state energy loss.

$R_{dA}$ ($d$+Au data/scaled $p+p$ fit). Nuclear modification factor for $d$+Au, $R_{dA}$, as a function of $p_{T}$ . The closed and open symbols show the results from the virtual- and real-photon measurements, respectively. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. The box on the right shows the uncertainty of $T_{dA}$ for $d$+Au. The curves indicate the theoretical calculations [24] with different combinations of the CNM effects such as the Cronin enhancement, isospin effect, nuclear shadowing and initial state energy loss.

$R_{AA}$ (Au+Au MB data/scaled $p+p$ fit). Nuclear modification factors for Au+Au (MB) and $d$+Au as a function of $p_{T}$ . The triangle symbols show results from the (closed) virtual [1] and (open) real photon [5] measurements, respectively. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. The (+) symbols for $R_{dA}$ for $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/$c$ illustrates the difference in magnitude for $R_{AA}$ between Au+Au and $d$+Au collisions.

$R_{AA}$ (Au+Au MB data/scaled $p+p$ fit). Nuclear modification factors for Au+Au (MB) and $d$+Au as a function of $p_{T}$ . The triangle symbols show results from the (closed) virtual [1] and (open) real photon [5] measurements, respectively. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. The (+) symbols for $R_{dA}$ for $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/$c$ illustrates the difference in magnitude for $R_{AA}$ between Au+Au and $d$+Au collisions.

The nuclear modification factor $R_{CuAu}$ as a function of the number of participating nucleons for 1.2 < $|y|$ < 2.2 and 1 < $p_T$ < 5 GeV/$c$. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

The nuclear modification factor $R_{CuAu}$ as a function of the number of participating nucleons for 1.2 < $|y|$ < 2.2 and 1 < $p_T$ < 5 GeV/$c$. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

The nuclear modification factor $R_{CuAu}$ as a function of rapidity for 1 < $p_T$ < 5 GeV/$c$ and 0%– 93% centrality. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

The forward/backward ratio as a function of the number of participating nucleons for 1 < $p_T$ < 5 GeV/$c$ and 1.2 < $|y|$ < 2.2. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point and Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point. For the B sys. error for centrality 0-20% forward/backward ratio 0.20, the value is $\pm$ < 0.10.

I_AA vs xi varying integration range

I_AA vs xi varying integration range

Multiplicity in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 130 GeV

Transverse energy in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV

Multiplicity in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV

Transverse energy in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 39 GeV

Multiplicity in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 39 GeV

Transverse energy in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27 GeV

Multiplicity in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27 GeV

Transverse energy in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV

Multiplicity in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV

Transverse energy in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 14.5 GeV

Multiplicity in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 14.5 GeV

Transverse energy in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV

Multiplicity in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV

Transverse energy in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

Multiplicity in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

Transverse energy in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV

Multiplicity in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV

Transverse energy in Cu+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

Multiplicity in Cu+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

Transverse energy in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV

Multiplicity in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV

Transverse energy in d+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

Multiplicity in d+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

Transverse energy in He+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

Multiplicity in He+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

Global variables for Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC from ALICE.

$p^{pp}_T$ dependence of $S_{loss}$ for $\pi^0$ in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from 2007 data from the PHENIX experiment at RHIC.

$p^{pp}_T$ dependence of $S_{loss}$ for $\pi^0$ in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions from 2004 data from the PHENIX experiment at RHIC for $p_T$ <10 GeV/$c$.

$p^{pp}_T$ dependence of $S_{loss}$ for $\pi^0$ in 200 GeV Cu+Cu collisions using the spectra measured by PHENIX at RHIC in 2005.

$p^{pp}_T$ dependence of $S_{loss}$ for $\pi^0$ in 62 GeV Au+Au collisions using the spectra measured by PHENIX in 2010.

$p^{pp}_T$ dependence of $S_{loss}$ for $\pi^0$ in 62.4 GeV Cu+Cu collisions using the spectra measured by PHENIX in 2005.

$p^{pp}_T$ dependence of $S_{loss}$ for $\pi^0$ in 2.76 TeV Pb+Pb collisions using the result from the ALICE experiment.

Parameters from fitting the indicated power-law functions for $\delta p_T/p_T$ to the data as a function of $p^{pp}_T$ for Au+Au collisions from 2004 data at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Parameters from fitting the indicated power-law functions for $\delta p_T/p_T$ to the data as a function of $p^{pp}_T$ for Au+Au collisions from 2007 data at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Parameters from fitting the indicated power-law functions for $\delta p_T/p_T$ to the data as a function of $p^{pp}_T$ for Cu+Cu collisions from 2005 data at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Parameters from fitting the indicated power-law functions for $\delta p_T/p_T$ to the data as a function of $p^{pp}_T$ for Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

Distribution of the invariant mass of the N N system.

Distribution of the invariant mass of the N PI system.

Distribution of the invariant mass of the N N PI system.

Distribution of the invariant mass of the N PI PI system.

Distribution of the PI+ angle in the centre-of-mass system.

Distribution of the angle of the N-N system in the centre-of-mass system.

Production rate for PI0 production in the rapidity range 9.4-9.6.

Production rate for PI0 production in the rapidity range 9.6-10.0.

Production rate for PI0 production in the rapidity range 10.0-11.0.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=5 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 318 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=5 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 251 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the central-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=5 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=7 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 225 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the shifted-vertex region. The (sys) error shown in the table is the total systematic uncertainty, excluding the normalisation uncertainties shown separately below.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=9 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=12 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=17 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=24 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=32 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=45 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=60 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=80 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

The reduced cross section for the reaction E+ P --> E+ X at a centre-of-mass energy 300 GeV and Q^2=110 GeV^2 for the years 1996 and 1997, after adjustment for FL extraction.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=9 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=12 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=17 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=24 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=32 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=45 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=60 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=80 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and FL for both unconstrained and constrained fits for Q^2=110 GeV^2.

Extracted values of F2 and R at nine Q^2 points.

The measured differential photoproduction cross section DSIG/DETARAP(gamma) for isolated photons accompanied by a jet.

The measured differential photoproduction cross section DSIG/DET(jet) for isolated photons accompanied by a jet.

The measured differential photoproduction cross section DSIG/DETARAP(jet) for isolated photons accompanied by a jet.

The measured differential photoproduction cross section DSIG/DX(gamma) for isolated photons accompanied by a jet.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and PT(JET) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.5% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(2JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(2) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and PT(JET) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.5% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(2JET)) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(2) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and PT(JET) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.5% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(2JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised inclusive dijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(2) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.6% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and MEAN(PT(3JET)) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Double-differential normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of Q**2 and XI(3) using the anti-kT jet algorithm. The total systematic uncertainty sums all systematic uncertainties in quadrature, including the uncertainty due to the LAr noise of 0.9% and the total normalisation uncertainty of 2.9%. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections C(HAD) and C(EW) are listed in the rightmost columns.

Angular dependence of the normalized differential cross section, $\sigma_0^{-1}{\rm d}\sigma/{\rm d}|\cos\theta^*|$, for the $K^+K^-$ process. The errors are statistical only.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section, ${\rm d}\sigma/{\rm d}|\cos\theta^*|$, for the $\pi^+\pi^-$ process. The errors are statistical only.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section, ${\rm d}\sigma/{\rm d}|\cos\theta^*|$, for the $K^+K^-$ process. The errors are statistical only.

Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).

Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).

Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).

Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).

Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).

Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).

Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).

Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).

Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).

Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).

Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).

The errors included the statistical and systematic uncertainties. Combined results, lower sqrt(s) data are also included. Three-parameter fit. Correlation matrix.

.

DATA AT 20, 25 AND 30 GEV/C SUMMED AND NORMALIZED TO THE CROSS SECTION AT 25 GEV/C.

.

DATA AT 20, 25 AND 30 GEV/C SUMMED AND NORMALIZED TO THE CROSS SECTION AT 25 GEV/C.

.

STATISTICAL ERRORS ONLY.

Mean values of the various variables.

Total yield of charged D* mesons per CC events.

The combined differential cross sections (DSIG/DET,OUT) separately for the low and high Q**2 regions. The data are corrected using the HERWIG-kt model.

The combined differential cross sections (DSIG/DET,OUT) separately for the low and high Q**2 regions. The data are corrected using the PHOJET model.

The combined differential cross sections (DSIG/DN,TRK) separately for the low and high Q**2 regions. The data are corrected using the HERWIG-kt model.

The combined differential cross sections (DSIG/DN,TRK) separately for the low and high Q**2 regions. The data are corrected using the PHOJET model.

The combined differential cross sections (DSIG/DPT,TRK) separately for the low and high Q**2 regions. The data are corrected using the HERWIG-kt model.

The combined differential cross sections (DSIG/DPT,TRK) separately for the low and high Q**2 regions. The data are corrected using the PHOJET model.

The combined energy flow (DE/DETARAP) separately for the low and high Q**2 regions. The data are corrected using the HERWIG-kt model.

The combined energy flow (DE/DETARAP) separately for the low and high Q**2 regions. The data are corrected using the PHOJET model.