Inclusive relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C}/M(p_{\rm T})$ as a function of $\sqrt{s}$ in pp collisions.

Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.

Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ as a function of $\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.

Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ normalized to $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle^{-0.5}$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.76 TeV.

Relative fluctuation $\sqrt{C_m}/M(p_{\rm T})_m$ normalized to $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle^{-0.5}$ as a function of $\langle {\rm d}N_{\rm ch}/{\rm d}\eta \rangle$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV.

C2 versus qinv for mixed-charge pions in six kT intervals. 45-50% centrality.

Fit parameters from two-pion correlations. 0-5% and 45-50% centrality. EW = Edgeworth, Gauss=Gaussian.

C3 versus Q3 for same-charge pions in six centrality intervals. Low KT3.

Cummulant c3 versus Q3 for same-charge pions in six centrality intervals. Low KT3.

C3 versus Q3 for same-charge pions in six centrality intervals. High KT3.

Cummulant c3 versus Q3 for same-charge pions in six centrality intervals. High KT3.

C3 versus Q3 for mixed-charge pions in six centrality intervals. Low KT3.

Cummulant c3 versus Q3 for mixed-charge pions in six centrality intervals. Low KT3.

C3 versus Q3 for mixed-charge pions in six centrality intervals. High KT3.

Cummulant c3 versus Q3 for mixed-charge pions in six centrality intervals. High KT3.

r3 for 0-5% centrality.

r3 for 5-10% centrality.

r3 for 10-20% centrality.

r3 for 20-30% centrality.

r3 for 30-40% centrality.

r3 for 40-50% centrality.

$\lambda_{{\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}}+\lambda_{{\rm \overline{p}} \overline{\Lambda}}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}$.

$\lambda_{{\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}}+\lambda_{{\rm \overline{p}} \overline{\Lambda}}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}$.

$\lambda_{{\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}}+\lambda_{{\rm \overline{p}} \overline{\Lambda}}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}$.

$\lambda_{{\rm p}{\rm {p}}}+\lambda_{{\rm {p}}\Lambda}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm {p}}{\rm {p}}$.

$\lambda_{{\rm p}{\rm {p}}}+\lambda_{{\rm {p}}\Lambda}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm {p}}{\rm {p}}$.

$\lambda_{{\rm p}{\rm {p}}}+\lambda_{{\rm {p}}\Lambda}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm {p}}{\rm {p}}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{\pm}}{\rm K^{\pm}}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{\pm}}{\rm K^{\pm}}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{\pm}}{\rm K^{\pm}}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for $\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\pm}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for $\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\pm}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for $\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\pm}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm {p}}{\rm {p}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm {p}}{\rm {p}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm {p}}{\rm {p}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{\pm}}{\rm K^{\pm}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{\pm}}{\rm K^{\pm}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{\pm}}{\rm K^{\pm}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for $\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\pm}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for $\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\pm}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for $\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\pm}$.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70To80%.

$\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 60_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 60_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 50_60%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 50_60%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70-80%.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Projections of the correlation function C.

Projections of the correlation function C.

Projections of the correlation function C.

Projections of the correlation function C.

Pion HBT radii for the 5% most central collisions.

Pion HBT radii for the 5% most central collisions from the STAR experiment at 200 GeV taken from Adams et al. PR C71(2005)044906.

Ratio of Pion HBT radii for the OUT projection to that for the SIDE projection for the 5% most central collisions.

Ratio of Pion HBT radii for the OUT projection to that for the SIDE projection for the 5% most central collisions from the STAR experiment at 200 GeV taken from Adams et al. PR C71(2005)044906.;.

Pion HBT radii at KT=0.3 for the 5% most central collisions as a function of the central charged multiplicity. Data from other experiments is shown for comparison.

Product of the three HBT radii at KT=0.3 for the 5% most central collisions as a function of the central charged multiplicity. Data from other experiments is shown for comparison.

The decoupling time extracted from R_long(KT) as a function of the central charged multiplicity. Data from other experiments is shown for comparison.

C(k*)/(linear baseline fit) for K0s K+ and all kT bin

C(k*)/(linear baseline fit) for K0s K+ and kT < 0.675 GeV/c bin

C(k*)/(linear baseline fit) for K0s K+ and kT > 0.675 GeV/c bin

C(k*)/(linear baseline fit) for K0s K- and all kT bin

C(k*)/(linear baseline fit) for K0s K- and kT < 0.675 GeV/c bin

C(k*)/(linear baseline fit) for K0s K- and kT > 0.675 GeV/c bin

R vs. kT for K0s K- with Achasov1 parameters

lambda vs. kT for K0s K- with Achasov1 parameters

R vs. kT for K0s K+- with Achasov1 parameters and linear fit

lambda vs. kT for K0s K+- with Achasov1 parameters and linear fit

K p (same charge) correlation function for centrality 5-10% from Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV

K p correlation function for centrality 10-20% from Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV

K p (same charge) correlation function for centrality 10-20% from Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV

K p correlation function for centrality 20-30% from Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV

K p (same charge) correlation function for centrality 20-30% from Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV

K p correlation function for centrality 30-40% from Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV

K p (same charge) correlation function for centrality 30-40% from Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV

K p correlation function for centrality 40-50% from Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV

K p (same charge) correlation function for centrality 40-50% from Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV

Balance function $B^{\pi\pi}$ projected onto the $\Delta y$ axis for particle pairs within the full range $|\Delta\varphi|\leq \pi$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{{\rm K}\pi}$ projected onto the $\Delta y$ axis for particle pairs within the full range $|\Delta\varphi|\leq \pi$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{{\rm p}\pi}$ projected onto the $\Delta y$ axis for particle pairs within the full range $|\Delta\varphi|\leq \pi$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{\pi{\rm K}}$ projected onto the $\Delta y$ axis for particle pairs within the full range $|\Delta\varphi|\leq \pi$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{{\rm KK}}$ projected onto the $\Delta y$ axis for particle pairs within the full range $|\Delta\varphi|\leq \pi$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{{\rm pK}}$ projected onto the $\Delta y$ axis for particle pairs within the full range $|\Delta\varphi|\leq \pi$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{\pi{\rm p}}$ projected onto the $\Delta y$ axis for particle pairs within the full range $|\Delta\varphi|\leq \pi$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{{\rm Kp}}$ projected onto the $\Delta y$ axis for particle pairs within the full range $|\Delta\varphi|\leq \pi$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{{\rm pp}}$ projected onto the $\Delta y$ axis for particle pairs within the full range $|\Delta\varphi|\leq \pi$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{\pi\pi}$ projected onto the $\Delta \varphi$ axis in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{{\rm K}\pi}$ projected onto the $\Delta \varphi$ axis in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{{\rm p}\pi}$ projected onto the $\Delta \varphi$ axis in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{\pi{\rm K}}$ projected onto the $\Delta \varphi$ axis in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{{\rm KK}}$ projected onto the $\Delta \varphi$ axis in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{{\rm pK}}$ projected onto the $\Delta \varphi$ axis in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{\pi{\rm p}}$ projected onto the $\Delta \varphi$ axis in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{{\rm Kp}}$ projected onto the $\Delta \varphi$ axis in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Balance function $B^{{\rm pp}}$ projected onto the $\Delta \varphi$ axis in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=2.76\;\text{TeV}$ for selected centrality ranges ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Longitudinal ($\Delta y$) $\sigma$ widths of balance functions of the full species matrix of $\pi^{\pm}$, ${\rm K}^{\pm}$, and ${\rm p/\bar{p}}$ with centrality. Pairs ${\rm K}\pi$, ${\rm p}\pi$, and ${\rm pK}$ have the same values with $\pi{\rm K}$, $\pi{\rm p}$, and ${\rm Kp}$, respectively. The relative azimuthal angle range for all the species pairs is the full azimuth range $|\Delta\varphi|\leq\pi$ ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Azimuthal ($\Delta\varphi$) $\sigma$ widths of balance functions of the full species matrix of $\pi^{\pm}$, ${\rm K}^{\pm}$, and ${\rm p/\bar{p}}$ with centrality. Pairs ${\rm K}\pi$, ${\rm p}\pi$, and ${\rm pK}$ have the same values with $\pi{\rm K}$, $\pi{\rm p}$, and ${\rm Kp}$, respectively. The relative rapidity range used for all species pairs is $|\Delta y|\leq 1.2$, with the exception of $|\Delta y|\leq 1.4$ for $\pi\pi$ and $|\Delta y|\leq 1.0$ for $\rm pp$ ($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Integrals of balance functions of the full species matrix of $\pi^{\pm}$, ${\rm K}^{\pm}$, and ${\rm p/\bar{p}}$ with centrality($\pi,{\rm K}: 0.2 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.0\;{\rm GeV}/c$; ${\rm p}: 0.5 \leq p_{\rm T} \leq 2.5\;{\rm GeV}/c$).

Two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CI}$ for 0$-$5% multiplicity class pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7\;\text{TeV}$.

Two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CI}$ for 30$-$40% multiplicity class pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7\;\text{TeV}$.

Two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CI}$ for 70$-$80% multiplicity class pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7\;\text{TeV}$.

Two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CD}$ for 0$-$5% multiplicity class p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02\;\text{TeV}$.

Two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CD}$ for 30$-$40% multiplicity class p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02\;\text{TeV}$.

Two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CD}$ for 70$-$80% multiplicity class p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02\;\text{TeV}$.

Two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CI}$ for 0$-$5% multiplicity class p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02\;\text{TeV}$.

Two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CI}$ for 30$-$40% multiplicity class p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02\;\text{TeV}$.

Two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CI}$ for 70$-$80% multiplicity class p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02\;\text{TeV}$.

Near side ($|\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$) longitudinal projection of the two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CD}$ for 0$-$5%, 30$-$40%, and 70$-$80% multiplicity classes pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7\;\text{TeV}$. Systematic uncertainty on the long-range mean correlator strength $\delta B = 3.7\times 10^{-3}$, $5.8\times 10^{-3}$, and $6.5\times 10^{-3}$, respectively.

Azimuthal projection ($|\Delta\eta|<1.6$) of the two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CD}$ for 0$-$5%, 30$-$40%, and 70$-$80% multiplicity classes pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7\;\text{TeV}$. Systematic uncertainty on the long-range mean correlator strength $\delta B = 2.1\times 10^{-3}$, $4.3\times 10^{-3}$, and $7.7\times 10^{-3}$, respectively.

Near side ($|\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$) longitudinal projection of the two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CI}$ for 0$-$5%, 30$-$40%, and 70$-$80% multiplicity classes pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7\;\text{TeV}$. Systematic uncertainty on the long-range mean correlator strength $\delta B = 2.8\times 10^{-3}$, $6.6\times 10^{-3}$, and $2.9\times 10^{-2}$, respectively.

Azimuthal projection ($|\Delta\eta|<1.6$) of the two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CI}$ for 0$-$5%, 30$-$40%, and 70$-$80% multiplicity classes pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7\;\text{TeV}$. Systematic uncertainty on the long-range mean correlator strength $\delta B = 1.4\times 10^{-3}$, $7.2\times 10^{-3}$, and $2.6\times 10^{-2}$, respectively.

Near side ($|\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$) longitudinal projection of the two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CD}$ for 0$-$5%, 30$-$40%, and 70$-$80% multiplicity classes p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02\;\text{TeV}$. Systematic uncertainty on the long-range mean correlator strength $\delta B = 1.5\times 10^{-3}$, $2.7\times 10^{-3}$, and $5.0\times 10^{-3}$, respectively.

Azimuthal projection ($|\Delta\eta|<1.6$) of the two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CD}$ for 0$-$5%, 30$-$40%, and 70$-$80% multiplicity classes p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02\;\text{TeV}$. Systematic uncertainty on the long-range mean correlator strength $\delta B = 7.5\times 10^{-4}$, $1.6\times 10^{-3}$, and $3.6\times 10^{-3}$, respectively.

Near side ($|\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$) longitudinal projection of the two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CI}$ for 0$-$5%, 30$-$40%, and 70$-$80% multiplicity classes p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02\;\text{TeV}$. Systematic uncertainty on the long-range mean correlator strength $\delta B = 9.3\times 10^{-5}$, $8.1\times 10^{-4}$, and $6.7\times 10^{-3}$, respectively.

Azimuthal projection ($|\Delta\eta|<1.6$) of the two-particle transverse momentum correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CI}$ for 0$-$5%, 30$-$40%, and 70$-$80% multiplicity classes p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02\;\text{TeV}$. Systematic uncertainty on the long-range mean correlator strength $\delta B = 4.0\times 10^{-4}$, $1.5\times 10^{-3}$, and $7.5\times 10^{-3}$, respectively.

Evolution with the average charged particle multiplicity of the longitudinal widths of the two-particle transverse momentum differential correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CD}$ in pp and p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7\;\text{TeV}$ and $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02\;\text{TeV}$, respectively. Vertical bars (mostly smaller than the marker size) and filled boxes represent statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

Evolution with the average charged particle multiplicity of the azimuthal widths of the two-particle transverse momentum differential correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CD}$ in pp and p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7\;\text{TeV}$ and $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02\;\text{TeV}$, respectively. Vertical bars (mostly smaller than the marker size) and filled boxes represent statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

Evolution with the average charged particle multiplicity of the longitudinal widths of the two-particle transverse momentum differential correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CI}$ in pp and p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7\;\text{TeV}$ and $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02\;\text{TeV}$, respectively. Vertical bars (mostly smaller than the marker size) and filled boxes represent statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

Evolution with the average charged particle multiplicity of the azimuthal widths of the two-particle transverse momentum differential correlation $G_{2}^{\rm CI}$ in pp and p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7\;\text{TeV}$ and $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02\;\text{TeV}$, respectively. Vertical bars (mostly smaller than the marker size) and filled boxes represent statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

K$^+$p (K$^+$p $\oplus$ K$^-\overline{\mathrm p}$) correlation function in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV (40-100%).

K$^+$p (K$^+$p $\oplus$ K$^-\overline{\mathrm p}$) correlation function in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV (60-70%).

K$^+$p (K$^+$p $\oplus$ K$^-\overline{\mathrm p}$) correlation function in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV (70-80%).

K$^+$p (K$^+$p $\oplus$ K$^-\overline{\mathrm p}$) correlation function in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV (80-90%).

K$^-$p (K$^-$p $\oplus$ K$^+\overline{\mathrm p}$) correlation function in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV.

K$^-$p (K$^-$p $\oplus$ K$^+\overline{\mathrm p}$) correlation function in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV (0-20%).

K$^-$p (K$^-$p $\oplus$ K$^+\overline{\mathrm p}$) correlation function in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV (20-40%).

K$^-$p (K$^-$p $\oplus$ K$^+\overline{\mathrm p}$) correlation function in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV (40-100%).

K$^-$p (K$^-$p $\oplus$ K$^+\overline{\mathrm p}$) correlation function in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV (60-70%).

K$^-$p (K$^-$p $\oplus$ K$^+\overline{\mathrm p}$) correlation function in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV (70-80%).

K$^-$p (K$^-$p $\oplus$ K$^+\overline{\mathrm p}$) correlation function in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV (80-90%).

Scaling factor ($\alpha_j $) for $\mathrm{\overline{K}^0 n}$ extracted from the different fits of the K$^-$ p correlation function as a function of the core radius $r_{\mathrm{core}}$.

Scaling factor ($\alpha_j $) for $\pi \Sigma$ extracted from the different fits of the K$^-$ p correlation function as a function of the core radius $r_{\mathrm{core}}$.

This table shows the correlation coefficient between the $\alpha_{\mathrm{\overline{K}^0 n}}$ and $\alpha_{\pi \Sigma}$ parameters extracted from the different fits to the K$^-$ p correlation function with free weights. The results are shown as a function of the core radius $r_{\mathrm{core}}$ shown in Table 7. The error on the correlation coefficient, shown as statistical errors in the table, are obteined by using the Pearson's formula to evaluate the probable error of correlation coefficient.