Differential cross section as a function of the transverse momentum PT of the third jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the transverse momentum PT of the fourth jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity eta of the leading jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity eta of the subleading jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity eta of the third jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the pseudorapidity eta of the fourth jet. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the azimuthal angle DeltaPhi between the third and the fourth jet, normalized to the total number of selected events. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the normalized PT balance DELTARELPT between the third and the fourth jet, normalized to the total number of selected events. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

Differential cross section as a function of the azimuthal angle between the two dijet planes (first-second and third-fourth jets), normalized to the total number of selected events. The first uncertainty is the statistical one, the second uncertainty is the combined systematic uncertainty including luminosity, jet energy scale, model dependence and jet energy resolution and trigger efficiency correction.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=90 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 460 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=120 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 460 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=150 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 460 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=200 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 460 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=250 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 460 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=300 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 460 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=400 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 460 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=500 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 460 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=650 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 460 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=800 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 460 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=35 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 575 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=45 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 575 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=60 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 575 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=90 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 575 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=120 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 575 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=150 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 575 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=200 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 575 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=250 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 575 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=300 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 575 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=400 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 575 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=500 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 575 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=650 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 575 GeV.

The neutral current reduced cross section at Q^2=800 GeV^2 for a proton energy of 575 GeV.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=1.5 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=2.0 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=2.5 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=3.5 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=5.0 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=6.5 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=8.5 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=12 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=15 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=20 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=25 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=35 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=45 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=60 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=90 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=120 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=150 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=200 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=250 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=300 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=400 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=500 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=650 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure functions FL and F2 measured at Q^2=800 GeV^2 as a function of X without model assumptions.

The proton structure function FL obtained by averaging the FL data from the previous tables.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 10-30%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 5 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 10-30%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 30-50%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Charged jet spectra using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 0.15 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 0-10%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet spectra with leading track selection of pT > 10 GeV to pT > 5 GeV using two cone radius parameters R = 0.2 and 0.3, for centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 0-10% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 10-30% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, for charged jets with either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. Central collisions are defined to have centrality 30-50% and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 0.15 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Nuclear modification factor, constructed as the ratio of jet pT spectra in central and peripheral collisions normalized by the nuclear overlap functions, as a function of the average number of participants in the collision (<Npart>), for charged jets with pT = 60-70 GeV and either R = 0.2 or R = 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 10 GeV. The correspondence between <Npart> and the centrality classes is given in Table 1 of the paper, and peripheral collisions are defined to have centrality 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

Ratio of charged jet pT-spectra with radius parameter R = 0.2 and 0.3 and a leading charged particle with pT > 5 GeV, for two centrality classes 0-10% and 50-80%. The two systematic uncertainties correspond to the shape uncertainty and the correlated uncertainty.

The DY pre-FSR cross section measurements for the combined dimuon and dielectron channels normalized to the Z-peak region in the full acceptance.

The DY dimuon rapidity spectrum within the detector acceptance, normalized to the Z-peak region, for the mass bin 20-30 GeV. The two columns correspond to pre-FSR and post-FSR. The uncertainties are the total experimental uncertainties.

The DY dimuon rapidity spectrum within the detector acceptance, normalized to the Z-peak region, for the mass bin 30-45 GeV. The two columns correspond to pre-FSR and post-FSR. The uncertainties are the total experimental uncertainties.

The DY dimuon rapidity spectrum within the detector acceptance, normalized to the Z-peak region, for the mass bin 45-60 GeV. The two columns correspond to pre-FSR and post-FSR. The uncertainties are the total experimental uncertainties.

The DY dimuon rapidity spectrum within the detector acceptance, normalized to the Z-peak region, for the mass bin 60-120 GeV. The two columns correspond to pre-FSR and post-FSR. The uncertainties are the total experimental uncertainties.

The DY dimuon rapidity spectrum within the detector acceptance, normalized to the Z-peak region, for the mass bin 120-200 GeV. The two columns correspond to pre-FSR and post-FSR. The uncertainties are the total experimental uncertainties.

The DY dimuon rapidity spectrum within the detector acceptance, normalized to the Z-peak region, for the mass bin 200-1500 GeV. The two columns correspond to pre-FSR and post-FSR. The uncertainties are the total experimental uncertainties.

Correlation matrix for the normalized differential cross section as a function of the absolute value of the lepton pseudorapidity from the W-boson decay, 1/sigma(pp->W+c+X) dsigma(W+c+X)/d|eta|, for pT(lepton) > 35 GeV.

The differential cross section as a function of the absolute value of the lepton pseudorapidity from the W-boson decay, dsigma(W+c+X)/d|eta|, for pT(lepton) > 25 GeV and > 35 GeV.

Correlation matrix for the differential cross section as a function of the absolute value of the lepton pseudorapidity from the W-boson decay, dsigma(W+c+X)/d|eta|, for pT(lepton) > 25 GeV.

Correlation matrix for the differential cross section as a function of the absolute value of the lepton pseudorapidity from the W-boson decay, dsigma(W+c+X)/d|eta|, for pT(lepton) > 35 GeV.

Charged cross section ratio, sigma(pp->W^+ + cbar + X)/sigma(pp->W^- + c + X), in the full lepton pseudorapidity interval, for pT(lepton) > 25 GeV and > 35 GeV.

Charged cross section ratio, sigma(pp->W^+ + cbar + X)/sigma(pp->W^- + c + X), as a function of the absolute value of the lepton pseudorapidity from the W-boson decay, for pT(lepton) > 25 GeV and > 35 GeV.

Observed limits on the effective theory mass scale M* as a function of the dark matter mass M(chi) at 90% confidence-level from combined mono-W-boson and mono-Z-boson signals for various operators.

Limits on chi-nucleon cross sections as a function of M(chi) at 90% confidence-level.

Limit on the Higgs boson cross section for decay to invisible particles divided by the cross section for decays to Standard Model particles as a function of M(Higgs) at 95% confidence-level.

Acceptance (A), efficiency (EPSILON), cross-section (SIG) and limits in number of events for the excited quark benchmark model, as a function of the signal mass M(q*). Uncertainties on the cross section are on the order of 1%. The limits include statistical uncertainties only. Expected limits include the 68% uncertainty band. Acceptance was calculated using parton-level quantities by imposing criteria that apply directly to kinematic selections (photon/jet |eta|, photon/jet transverse momentum, Delta(eta), Delta(R)). All other selections, which in general correspond to event and object quality criteria, were used to calculate the efficiency based on the events included in the acceptance.

Data for the semi-leptonic resolved analysis.

Information about functional form used to fit the data (labeled Background in the paper): F = [(1 - x)^c1 ] / [x^(c2+c3*ln(x)], where x = m/sqrt(s).

Expected and observed limits on the production cross section from the threshold analysis, in units of pb, for the narrow Zprime hypothesis.

Expected and observed limits on the production cross section from the threshold analysis, in units of pb, for the wide Zprime hypothesis.

Expected and observed limits on the production cross section from the threshold analysis, in units of pb, for the RS Gluon hypothesis.

Expected and observed combined limits on the production cross section from the boosted analyses, in units of pb, for the narrow Zprime hypothesis.

Expected and observed combined limits on the production cross section from the boosted analyses, in units of pb, for the wide Zprime hypothesis.

Expected and observed combined limits on the production cross section from the boosted analyses, in units of pb, for the RS Gluon hypothesis.