Mean $p_T$ values of the $\Upsilon(1$S$)$, $\Upsilon(2$S$)$, and $\Upsilon(3$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,0\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$

Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $0<p_T<5\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $5<p_T<7\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $7<p_T<9\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $9<p_T<11\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $11<p_T<15\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $15<p_T<20\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $20<p_T<50\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $0<p_T<5\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $5<p_T<7\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $7<p_T<9\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $9<p_T<11\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $11<p_T<15\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $15<p_T<20\,$GeV range

Ratio $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ with $|y|\,<\,1.2$ as a function of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in $20<p_T<50\,$GeV range

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of "forward" track multiplicity $N_{track}^{\Delta\phi}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$. Forward tracks are those with momentum direction in $\Delta\phi\,<\,\pi/3$ w.r.t. the $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of "transverse" track multiplicity $N_{track}^{\Delta\phi}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$. Transverse tracks are those with momentum direction in $\pi/3\,<\,\Delta\phi\,<\,2\pi/3$ w.r.t. the $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of "backward" track multiplicity $N_{track}^{\Delta\phi}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$. Backward tracks are those with momentum direction in $\Delta\phi\,>\,2\pi/3$ w.r.t. the $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ and $N^{\Delta R}_{track}\,=\,0$ charged particles produced in $\Delta R\,<\,0.5$ cone around $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ and $N^{\Delta R}_{track}\,=\,1$ charged particles produced in $\Delta R\,<\,0.5$ cone around $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ and $N^{\Delta R}_{track}\,=\,2$ charged particles produced in $\Delta R\,<\,0.5$ cone around $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$ and $N^{\Delta R}_{track}\,>\,2$ charged particles produced in $\Delta R\,<\,0.5$ cone around $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ momentum direction.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in transverse sphericity bin $0.00\,<\,S_T\,<\,0.55$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in transverse sphericity bin $0.55\,<\,S_T\,<\,0.70$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in transverse sphericity bin $0.70\,<\,S_T\,<\,0.85$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$.

Ratios $\Upsilon(2$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ and $\Upsilon(3$S$)\,/\,\Upsilon(1$S$)$ as functions of track multiplicity $N_{track}$ in transverse sphericity bin $0.85\,<\,S_T\,<\,1.00$ for $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ states with $p_T\,>\,7\,GeV$ and $|y|\,<\,1.2$.

Efficiency-corrected multiplicity bins used in the $\Upsilon(n$S$)$ ratio analysis and the corresponding mean number of charged particle tracks.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential cross section of prompt $\rm{D_{s}}$ mesons in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV in the rapidity interval $|y|$<0.5. Branching ratio of $\rm{D_{s}}\rightarrow\phi\pi\rightarrow K K \pi$ : 0.0227.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential cross section of inclusive $\rm{D}^{0}$ mesons (including also $\rm{D}^{0}$ mesons from beauty-hadron decays) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV in the rapidity interval $|y|$<0.5. Branching ratio of $\rm{D}^{0}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratio of $\rm {D}^{+}$ to $\rm{D}^{0}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{+}}\rightarrow K\pi\pi$ : 0.0898. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratio of $\rm {D}^{*+}$ to $\rm{D}^{0}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of $\rm D^{+-}\rightarrow K{\rm{\pi}}{\rm{\pi}}$: 0.0389*0.677. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratio of $\rm {D}_{s}$ to $\rm{D}^{0}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of $\rm{D_s}\rightarrow \phi \pi \rightarrow KK\pi$ : 0.0227. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratio of $\rm {D}_{s}$ to $\rm {D}^{+}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of $\rm{D_s}\rightarrow \phi \pi \rightarrow KK\pi$ : 0.0227. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{+}}\rightarrow K\pi\pi$ : 0.0898.

Ratio of $\rm {D}^{+}$ to $\rm{D}^{0}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. The cross section for $\rm {D}^{0}$ and $\rm {D}^{+}$ mesons in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV were updated with respect to Eur.Phys.J. C77 no.8 (2017)550 to account for the change of the world-average BR of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ and $\rm{D^{+}}\rightarrow K\pi\pi$ from ($3.93\% \pm 0.04$) to ($3.89\% \pm 0.04$), and from ($9.46\% \pm 0.24$) to ($8.98\% \pm 0.28$), respectively. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{+}}\rightarrow K\pi\pi$ : 0.0898. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratio of $\rm {D}^{*+}$ to $\rm{D}^{0}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. The cross section for $\rm {D}^{0}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV was updated with respect to Eur.Phys.J. C77 no.8 (2017)550 to account for the change of the world-average BR of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ from ($3.93\% \pm 0.04$) to ($3.89\% \pm 0.04$). Branching ratio of $\rm D^{+-}\rightarrow K{\rm{\pi}}{\rm{\pi}}$: 0.0389*0.677. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratio of $\rm {D}_{s}$ to $\rm{D}^{0}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. The cross section for $\rm {D}^{0}$ mesons in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV was updated with respect to Eur.Phys.J. C77 no.8 (2017)550 to account for the change of the world-average BR of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ from ($3.93\% \pm 0.04$) to ($3.89\% \pm 0.04$). Branching ratio of $\rm{D_s}\rightarrow \phi \pi \rightarrow KK\pi$ : 0.0227. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratio of $\rm {D}_{s}$ to $\rm {D}^{+}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV in |y|<0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. The cross section for $\rm {D}^{+}$ mesons in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV was updated with respect to Eur.Phys.J. C77 no.8 (2017)550 to account for the change of the world-average BR of $\rm{D^{+}}\rightarrow K\pi\pi$ from ($9.46\% \pm 0.24$) to ($8.98\% \pm 0.28$). Branching ratio of $\rm{D_s}\rightarrow \phi \pi \rightarrow KK\pi$ : 0.0227. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{+}}\rightarrow K\pi\pi$ : 0.0898.

Ratios of $\rm {D}^{0}$-mesons production cross sections in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV and $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. The cross section for $\rm {D}^{0}$ mesons in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV was updated with respect to Eur.Phys.J. C77 no.8 (2017)550 to account for the change of the world-average BR of $\rm{D}^{0}\rightarrow K\pi$ from ($3.93\% \pm 0.04$) to ($3.89\% \pm 0.04$). Branching ratio of $\rm{D}^{0}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0389.

Ratios of $\rm {D}^{+}$-mesons production cross sections in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV and $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. The cross section for $\rm {D}^{+}$ mesons in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV was updated with respect to Eur.Phys.J. C77 no.8 (2017)550 to account for the change of the world-average BR of $\rm D^{+-}\rightarrow K{\rm{\pi}}{\rm{\pi}}$ from ($9.46\% \pm 0.24$) to ($8.98\% \pm 0.28$). Branching ratio of $\rm D^{+-}\rightarrow K{\rm{\pi}}{\rm{\pi}}$ : 0.0898.

Ratios of $\rm {D}^{*+}$-mesons production cross sections in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV and $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of $\rm{D}^{*+}\rightarrow \rm{D}^{0}\pi\rightarrow K\pi\pi$: 0.02633.

Ratios of $\rm{D_{s}}$-mesons production cross sections in pp collisions at $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=7 TeV and $\sqrt{\rm{s_{NN}}}$=5.02 TeV as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ Branching ratio of $\rm{D_{s}}\rightarrow\phi\pi\rightarrow K K \pi$ : 0.0227.

First Column: Production cross sections for prompt D mesons (D0, D+, D*+ and D_s) at mid-rapidity in |y|<0.5 and full pT range, in pp collisions at 5.02 TeV. The second (sys) error is from the luminosity uncertainty, the third (sys) error is from the branching-ratio uncertainty. For D+, D*+ and Ds, the fourth (sys) error is due to the extrapolation to pt=0. Second column: value of <pT> of prompt D0 mesons in |y|<0.5. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the systematic uncertainty.

Invariant differential cross section of $\eta$ produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energy 8 TeV, the uncertainty of $\sigma_{MB}$ of 2.6% is not included in the systematic error.

Integrated yields of $\pi^0$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainties of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV are not included in the systematic error.

Integrated yields of $\pi^{0}$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainty of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV is not included in the systematic error.

Integrated yields of $\eta$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainties of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV are not included in the systematic error.

Integrated yields of $\eta$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainty of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV is not included in the systematic error.

Integrated $\eta$/$\pi^0$ ratio produced in inelastic pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV.

Integrated $\eta$/$\pi^{0}$ ratio produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV.

Mean transverse momenta $\langle p_\text{T}\rangle$ of $\pi^0$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainties of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV are not included in the systematic error.

Mean transverse momenta $\langle p_\text{T}\rangle$ of $\pi^{0}$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainty of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV is not included in the systematic error.

Mean transverse momenta $\langle p_\text{T}\rangle$ of $\eta$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainties of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV are not included in the systematic error.

Mean transverse momenta $\langle p_\text{T}\rangle$ of $\eta$ mesons produced in inelastic pp collisions at center of mass energies of 2.76 and 8 TeV. The uncertainty of $\sigma_{MB}$ of $^{+3.9\%}_{-6.4\%}(model)\pm2.0(lumi)$% for $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV and $\pm2.3$% for 8 TeV is not included in the systematic error.

The measured ratio of cross sections for inclusive $\eta$ to $\pi^0$ production at a centre-of-mass energy of 8 TeV.

The measured ratio of cross sections for inclusive $\eta$ to $\pi^{0}$ production at a center of mass energy of 8 TeV.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential cross section of prompt $\rm{D_{s}}$ mesons in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}$=7 TeV in the rapidity interval $|y|$<0.5. Branching ratio of $\rm{D_{s}}\rightarrow\phi\pi\rightarrow K K \pi$ : 0.0227.

Ratio of $\rm {D}^{+}$ to $\rm{D}^{0}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}$=7 TeV in -0.5 $<y<$ 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{+}}\rightarrow K\pi\pi$ : 0.0946. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0393.

Ratio of $\rm {D}^{*+}$ to $\rm{D}^{0}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}$=7 TeV in -0.5 $<y<$ 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of $\rm D^{+-}\rightarrow K{\rm{\pi}}{\rm{\pi}}$: 0.0393*0.677. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0393.

Ratio of $\rm {D}_{s}$ to $\rm{D}^{0}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}$=7 TeV in -0.5 $<y<$ 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of $\rm{D_s}\rightarrow \phi \pi \rightarrow KK\pi$ : 0.0227. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{0}}\rightarrow K\pi$ : 0.0393.

Ratio of $\rm {D}_{s}$ to $\rm {D}^{+}$ meson yield in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}$=7 TeV in -0.5 $<y<$ 0.5 as a function of $p_{\rm T}$. Branching ratio of $\rm{D_s}\rightarrow \phi \pi \rightarrow KK\pi$ : 0.0227. Branching ratio of $\rm{D^{+}}\rightarrow K\pi\pi$ : 0.0946.

Production cross sections per unit of rapidity for prompt $\rm{D}^{0}$ mesons at mid-rapidity in pp collisions at 7 TeV. The second (sys) error is from the luminosity uncertainty, the third (sys) error is from the branching-ratio uncertainty.

Production cross sections per unit of rapidity for prompt $\rm{D}^{+}$ mesons at mid-rapidity in pp collisions at 7 TeV. The second (sys) error is from the luminosity uncertainty, the third (sys) error is from the branching-ratio uncertainty.

Production cross sections per unit of rapidity for prompt $\rm D^{*+}$ mesons at mid-rapidity in pp collisions at 7 TeV. The second (sys) error is from the luminosity uncertainty, the third (sys) error is from the branching-ratio uncertainty.

Production cross sections per unit of rapidity for prompt $\rm D_{s}$) mesons at mid-rapidity in pp collisions at 7 TeV. The second (sys) error is from the luminosity uncertainty, the third (sys) error is from the branching-ratio uncertainty.

Production cross sections per unit of rapidity for charm quarks at mid-rapidity in pp collisions at 7 TeV. The second (sys) error is from the luminosity uncertainty, the third (sys) error is from the Fragmentation Function uncertainties, the fourth (sys) error is from the rapidity shapes of D0 mesons and single charm quarks.

value of <$p_{\rm T}$> of prompt $\rm{D}^{0}$ mesons in |$y$|<0.5. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the systematic uncertainty.

Total production cross sections, extrapolated to the full phase space, for prompt D0 mesons. The second (sys) error is the from the extrapolation uncertainty, the third from the luminosity uncertainty and the fourth from the branching-ratio uncertainties.

Total production cross sections, extrapolated to the full phase space, for charm quarks. The second (sys) error is from the extrapolation, the third is from the luminosity uncertainty and the fourth is from the Fragmentation Function uncertainties.

Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$ relative to their SM prediction from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also shown.

Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to WW)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{WW}$ from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The values involving cross sections are given for $\sqrt{s}$=8 TeV, assuming the SM values for $\sigma_i(7 \mathrm{TeV})/\sigma_i(8 \mathrm{TeV})$. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also shown.

Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to WW)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{WW}$ relative to their SM prediction from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also shown.

Best fit values of $\kappa_{gZ}= \kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z} / \kappa_{H}$ and of the ratios of coupling modifiers, as defined in the most generic parameterisation described in the context of the $\kappa$ framework, from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The uncertainties in $\lambda_{tg}$ and $\lambda_{WZ}$, for which a negative solution is allowed, are calculated around the overall best fit value. The expected total uncertainties in the measurements are also shown. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Measured global signal strength $\mu$ and its total uncertainty, together with the breakdown of the uncertainty into its four components as defined in the text. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and separately for each experiment. The expected uncertainty, with its breakdown, is also shown.

Measured signal strengths $\mu$ and their total uncertainties for different Higgs boson production processes. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and separately for each experiment, for the combined $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also displayed. These results are obtained assuming that the Higgs boson branching fractions are the same as in the SM.

Measured signal strengths $\mu$ and their total uncertainties for different Higgs boson decay channels. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and separately for each experiment, for the combined $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also displayed. These results are obtained assuming that the Higgs boson production process cross sections at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 and 8 TeV are the same as in the SM.

Results of the ten-parameter fit of $\mu_F^f = \mu_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}^f$ and $\mu_V^f = \mu_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}^f$ for each of the five decay channels. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, together with their measured and expected uncertainties. The measured results are also shown separately for each experiment.

Results of the six-parameter fit of the global ratio $\mu_V/\mu_F = \mu_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}/\mu_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$ together with $\mu_F^f$ for each of the five decay channels. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, together with their measured and expected uncertainties. The measured results are also shown separately for each experiment.

Fit results allowing BSM loop couplings, assuming that $|\kappa_{V}| \le$ 1, where $\kappa_{V}$ denotes $\kappa_{Z}$ or $\kappa_{W}$, and that $\mathrm{B_{BSM}} \ge$ 0. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. For the parameters with both signs allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ interval is shown on a second line. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Fit results allowing BSM loop couplings, assuming that there are no additional BSM contributions to the Higgs boson width, i.e. $\mathrm{B_{BSM}}=0$. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. For the parameters with both signs allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ interval is shown on a second line. When a parameter is constrained and reaches a boundary, namely $\mathrm{B_{BSM}}$ = 0, the uncertainty is not indicated. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Fit results for the parameterisation assuming the absence of BSM particles in the loops ($\mathrm{B_{BSM}}$=0). The results with their measured and expected uncertainties are reported for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, together with the individual results from each experiment. For the parameters with both signs allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ CL interval is shown on a second line. When a parameter is constrained and reaches a boundary, namely $|\kappa_\mu|$ = 0, the uncertainty is not indicated. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Summary of fit results for a parameterisation probing the ratios of coupling modifiers for up-type versus down-type fermions. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported together with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. The parameter $\kappa_{uu}$ is positive definite since $\kappa_H$ is always assumed to be positive. For the parameter $\lambda_{du}$, for which both signs are allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ CL interval is shown on a second line. Negative values for the parameter $\lambda_{Vu}$ are excluded by more than 4$\sigma$.

Summary of fit results for a parameterisation probing the ratios of coupling modifiers for leptons versus quarks. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported together with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. The parameter $\kappa_{qq}$ is positive definite since $\kappa_H$ is always assumed to be positive. For the parameter $\lambda_{lq}$, for which there is no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown. Negative values for the parameter $\lambda_{Vq}$ are excluded by more than 4$\sigma$.

Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with 23 parameters, $\sigma_i\cdot\mathrm{B}^f$ for each specific channel $i\to H\to f$. Only 20 parameters are shown because the other three, corresponding to the $H\to ZZ$ decay channel for the $WH$, $ZH$, and $ttH$ production processes, are not measured with a meaningful precision.

Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with nine parameters, $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$.

Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with seven parameters, $\kappa_{gZ}=\kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z} / \kappa_{H}$ and the ratios of coupling modifiers.

Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with 23 parameters, $\sigma_i\cdot\mathrm{B}^f$ for each specific channel $i\to H\to f$. Only 20 parameters are shown because the other three, corresponding to the $H\to ZZ$ decay channel for the $WH$, $ZH$, and $ttH$ production processes, are not measured with a meaningful precision.

Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with nine parameters, $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$.

Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with seven parameters, $\kappa_{gZ}=\kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z} / \kappa_{H}$ and the ratios of coupling modifiers.

ATLAS+CMS combined best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.

ATLAS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.

CMS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel.

ATLAS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.

CMS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel.

psi(2S) double-differential cross section times branching fraction and the corresponding scaling factors to obtain the cross sections for different polarization scenarios (azimuthal polarization parameter in the center of mass helicity frame lambda_theta^HX = +1, -1, +0.03) as a function of pT for |y| < 1.2.

Ratio of psi(2S) to J/psi differential cross section times branching fractions assuming unpolarized productions as a function of pT for |y| < 1.2.