Hadronic event shapes have been measured in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV, with a data sample collected with the CMS detector at the LHC. The sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 3.2 inverse picobarns. Event-shape distributions, corrected for detector response, are compared with five models of QCD multijet production.
Distribution of the logarithm of the central transverse thrust for events with jet transverse momentum > 30 GeV, jet |pseudorapidity| < 1.3 and leading the jet transverse momentum from 90 to 125 GeV/c,.
Distribution of the logarithm of the central thrust minor for events with jet transverse momentum > 30 GeV, jet |pseudorapidity| < 1.3 and leading the jet transverse momentum from 90 to 125 GeV/c,.
Distribution of the logarithm of the central transverse thrust for events with jet transverse momentum > 30 GeV, jet |pseudorapidity| < 1.3 and leading the jet transverse momentum from 125 to 200 GeV/c,.
Characteristics of the hadronic final state of diffractive deep inelastic scattering events, ep -> eXp, were studied in the kinematic range 4 < M_X < 35 GeV, 4 < Q^2 < 150 GeV^2, 70 < W < 250 GeV and 0.0003 < x_pom < 0.03 with the ZEUS detector at HERA using an integrated luminosity of 13.8 pb^{-1}. The events were tagged by identifying the diffractively scattered proton using the leading proton spectrometer. The properties of the hadronic final state, X, were studied in its center-of-mass frame using thrust, thrust angle, sphericity, energy flow, transverse energy flow and ``seagull'' distributions. As the invariant mass of the system increases, the final state becomes more collimated, more aligned and more asymmetric in the average transverse momentum with respect to the direction of the virtual photon. Comparisons of the properties of the hadronic final state with predictions from various Monte Carlo model generators suggest that the final state is dominated by qqg states at the parton level.
Thrust distribution for a DIS hadronic final state mass between 11 and 17.8GeV.
Thrust distribution for a DIS hadronic final state mass between 17.8 and 27.7 GeV.
Sphericity distribution for a DIS hadronic final state mass between 11 and 17.8 GeV.
A global event shape analysis of the multihadronic final states observed in neutral current deep inelastic scattering events with a large rapidity gap with respect to the proton direction is presented. The analysis is performed in the range $5 \leq Q^2 \leq 185\gev^2$ and $160 \leq W \leq 250\gev$, where $Q^2$ is the virtuality of the photon and $W$ is the virtual-photon proton centre of mass energy. Particular emphasis is placed on the dependence of the shape variables, measured in the $\gamma^*-$pomeron rest frame, on the mass of the hadronic final state, $M_X$. With increasing $M_X$ the multihadronic final state becomes more collimated and planar. The experimental results are compared with several models which attempt to describe diffractive events. The broadening effects exhibited by the data require in these models a significant gluon component of the pomeron.
Measured (uncorrected) polar distribution of the sphericity axis w.r.t. thevirtual photon direction in the (gamma*-pomeron)rest frame Data are in bins of the mass of the final state hadronic system.
Measured (uncorrected) polar distribution of the sphericity axis w.r.t. thevirtual photon direction in the (gamma*-pomeron)rest frame Data are in bins of the mass of the final state hadronic system.
Measured (uncorrected) polar distribution of the sphericity axis w.r.t. thevirtual photon direction in the (gamma*-pomeron)rest frame Data are in bins of the mass of the final state hadronic system.
Distributions are presented of event shape variables, jet roduction rates and charged particle momenta obtained from 53 000 hadronicZ decays. They are compared to the predictions of the QCD+hadronization models JETSET, ARIADNE and HERWIG, and are used to optimize several model parameters. The JETSET and ARIADNE coherent parton shower (PS) models with running αs and string fragmentation yield the best description of the data. The HERWIG parton shower model with cluster fragmentation fits the data less well. The data are in better agreement with JETSET PS than with JETSETO(αS2) matrix elements (ME) even when the renormalization scale is optimized.
Sphericity distribution.
Sphericity distribution.
Aplanarity distribution.
Forum