Negatively charged kaon spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 62.4 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.

Negatively charged proton spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 200 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.

Negatively charged proton spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 62.4 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.

Positively charged pion spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 200 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.

Positively charged pion spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 62.4 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.

Positively charged kaon spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 200 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.

Positively charged kaon spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 62.4 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.

Positively charged proton spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 200 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.

Positively charged proton spectra from Cu+Cu collisions 62.4 GeV as a function of pT for different centralities.

Mean transverse momentum of negatively charged pions, kaons and protons as a function of charged hadron multiplicity.

Mean transverse momentum of positively charged pions, kaons and protons as a function of charged hadron multiplicity [figure not available in published paper].

Integrated yields of negatively charged pions, kaons and protons as a function of charged hadron multiplicity.

Integrated yields of positively charged pions, kaons and protons as a function of charged hadron multiplicity [figure not available in published paper].

particle Ratios -I (pbar/pi^-, k^-/pi^-) versus multiplicity.

particle ratios -II (p/pi^+, k^+/pi^+) versus multiplicity.

particle ratios -III (p+pbar/pi, k/pi) versus multiplicity.

particle Ratios -IV (pi^-/pi^+, k^-/k^+, pbar/p) versus multiplicity [only pbar/p figure available in paper].

Enhancement factors for negatively charged pions, kaons and protons as a function of Npart [Ref. Phys.Rev.C 81, 044902, 2010]. pp dNdy values are from Ref [Phys.Rev.C 79, 034909, 2009].

The kinetic freeze-out temperature (Tkin) and chemical freeze-out temperature (Tch) versus multiplicity.

flow velocity versus multiplicity.

chemical potentials versus multiplicity.

strangeness suppression factor versus multiplicity.

dNch/deta values for different centrality.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.160 to 1.200 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.200 to 1.240 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.240 to 1.280 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.280 to 1.320 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.320 to 1.360 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.360 to 1.400 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.400 to 1.440 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.440 to 1.480 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.480 to 1.520 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.520 to 1.560 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.560 to 1.600 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.600 to 1.640 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.640 to 1.680 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.680 to 1.720 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.720 to 1.760 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.760 to 1.800 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.800 to 1.840 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.840 to 1.880 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.880 to 1.920 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.920 to 1.960 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 1.960 to 2.000 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.000 to 2.040 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.040 to 2.080 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.080 to 2.120 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.120 to 2.160 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.160 to 2.200 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.200 to 2.240 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.240 to 2.280 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.280 to 2.320 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.320 to 2.360 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.360 to 2.400 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.400 to 2.500 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.500 to 2.600 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.600 to 2.700 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.700 to 2.800 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.800 to 2.900 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 2.900 to 3.000 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 3.000 to 3.100 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 3.100 to 3.200 GeV.

Angular dependence of the differential cross section for the W range 3.200 to 3.300 GeV.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 718.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 723.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 727.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 731.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 735.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 739.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 743.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 748.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 752.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 756.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 760.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 768.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 772.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 777.1 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 781.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 785.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 789.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 793.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 797.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 801.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 805.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 809.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 814.1 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 818.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 822.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 826.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 830.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 834.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 838.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 842.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 846.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 850.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 854.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 858.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 862.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 866.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 870.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 874.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 878.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 882.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 886.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 890.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 894.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 898.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 902.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 906.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 910.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.3 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 914.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 918.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 922.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 926.1 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 930.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 933.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 937.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 941.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 945.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 949.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 953.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 957.1 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 960.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 964.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 968.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 972.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 976.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 980.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 983.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 987.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 991.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 995.1 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 998.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1002.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.4 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1006.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1011.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1019.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1026.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1034.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1041.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1048.6 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1055.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1063.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1070.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1077.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1084.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1091.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1098.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1105.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1112.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1119.1 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1125.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1132.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.5 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1139.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1146.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1152.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1159.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1165.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1172.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1178.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1185.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1191.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1198.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1204.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1210.5 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1216.7 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1222.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1229.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1235.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1242.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1251.3 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1260.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.8 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1268.9 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1277.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1287.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1300.0 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.9 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1315.1 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.8 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1335.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.8 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1355.4 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.8 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1376.2 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 4.9 PCT.

Differential cross section for the reaction GAMMA P --> ETA P at a photon energy of 1394.8 MeV. The errors in the table are statistical only and there is an overall systematic uncertainty of 5.0 PCT.

The K$\pi$ pair invariant mass distribution integrated over the $K^{*0}$ $p_T$ for minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ =62.4 GeV after mixed-event background subtraction.

The Kπ pair invariant mass distribution for various pT bins (top left) pT = 0.4–0.6 GeV/c in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV after the mixed-event background subtraction.

The Kπ pair invariant mass distribution for various pT bins (top right) pT = 0.6–0.8 GeV/c in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV after the mixed-event background subtraction.

The Kπ pair invariant mass distribution for various pT bins (bottom left) pT = 0.8–1.0 GeV/c in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV after the mixed-event background subtraction.

The Kπ pair invariant mass distribution for various pT bins (bottom right) pT = 1.0–1.2 GeV/c in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 62.4 GeV after the mixed-event background subtraction.

The signal-to-background ratio for $K^{*0}$ measurements as a function of $p_T$ for different collision centrality bins (0-10%, 10-40%, 40-60%, 60-80%) in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV.

$K^{*0}$ mass as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

$K^{*0}$ mass as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

$K^{*0}$ mass as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV

$K^{*0}$ mass as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

$K^{*0}$ width as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV

$K^{*0}$ width as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

$K^{*0}$ width as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV

$K^{*0}$ width as a function of $p_T$ for minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

The $K^{*0}$ reconstruction efficiency multiplied by the detector acceptance as a function of $p_T$ in Au+Au (|$\eta$| < 0.8) collisions at 200 GeV for different collision centrality bins (0-20% ,20-40% , 40-60%)

The $K^{*0}$ reconstruction efficiency multiplied by the detector acceptance as a function of $p_T$ in Cu+Cu (|$\eta$| < 1.0) collisions at 200 GeV for different collision centrality bins (0-20% ,20-40% , 40-60%)

Mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $p_T$ spectra for various collision centrality bins (0-20%, 20-40%, 40-60%, 60-80%) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV

Mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $p_T$ spectra for various collision centrality bins (0-20%, 20-40%, 40-60%) in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV

Mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $p_T$ spectra for various collision centrality bins (0-20%, 20-40%, 40-60%, 60-80%) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

Mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $p_T$ spectra for various collision centrality bins (0-20%, 20-40%, 40-60%) in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

The mid-rapidity yields dN/dy of $K^{*0}$ as a function of the average number of participating nucleons, $⟨N_{part}⟩$, for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV

The mid-rapidity yields dN/dy of $K^{*0}$ as a function of the average number of participating nucleons, $⟨N_{part}⟩$, for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV

The mid-rapidity yields dN/dy of $K^{*0}$ as a function of the average number of participating nucleons, $⟨N_{part}⟩$, for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

The mid-rapidity yields dN/dy of $K^{*0}$ as a function of the average number of participating nucleons, $⟨N_{part}⟩$, for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

The mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $⟨p_T⟩$ as a function $⟨N_{part}⟩$ for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV

The mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $⟨p_T⟩$ as a function $⟨N_{part}⟩$ for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV

The mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $⟨p_T⟩$ as a function $⟨N_{part}⟩$ for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

The mid-rapidity $K^{*0}$ $⟨p_T⟩$ as a function $⟨N_{part}⟩$ for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV

The mid-rapidity $⟨p_T⟩$ of $\pi$, K, p and $K^{*0}$ as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$ for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$

Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$

Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$

Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$

Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})N(K^-)$ in Au+Au collisions divided by $N(K^{*0})N(K^-)$ ratio in p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$.

Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})N(K^-)$ in Cu+Cu collisions divided by $N(K^{*0})N(K^-)$ ratio in p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$

Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})N(K^-)$ in d+Au collisions divided by $N(K^{*0})N(K^-)$ ratio in d+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$

Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio in minimum bias Au+Au collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}.

Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio in minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}.

Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio in minimum bias p+p collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}.

Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio in minimum bias Au+Au collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}.

Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio in minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}.

Mid-rapidity $N(K^{*0})/N(K^-)$ ratio in minimum bias p+p collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}.

Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$

Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$

Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$

Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$

Mid-rapidity $[N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})]$ in Au+Au collisions divided by $[N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})]$ ratio in p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$

Mid-rapidity $[N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})]$ in Cu+Cu collisions divided by $[N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})]$ ratio in p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$

Mid-rapidity $[N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})]$ in d+Au collisions divided by $[N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})]$ ratio in p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV as a function of $⟨N_{part}⟩$

Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio in minimum bias Au+Au collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$.

Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio in minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$.

Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio in minimum bias p+p collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$.

Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio in minimum bias Au+Au collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$.

Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio in minimum bias Cu+Cu collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$.

Mid-rapidity $N(\phi)/N(K^{*0})$ ratio in minimum bias p+p collisions as a function of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$.

The $K^{*0}$ $v_2$ (Run IV) as a function of $p_T$ in minimum bias Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $K^{*0}$ $v_2$ (Run II) as a function of $p_T$ in minimum bias Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $K^{*0}$ $R_{CP}$ as a function of $p_T$ in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 and 200 GeV compared to the $R_{CP}$ of $K^0_S$ and $\Lambda$ at 200 GeV.

The $K^{*0}$ $R_{CP}$ as a function of $p_T$ in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 and 200 GeV compared to the $R_{CP}$ of $K^0_S$ and $\Lambda$ at 200 GeV.

The $K^{*0}$ $R_{CP}$ as a function of $p_T$ in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 and 200 GeV compared to the $R_{CP}$ of $K^0_S$ and $\Lambda$ at 200 GeV.

The $K^{*0}$ ~$R_{CP}$~ as a function of $p_T$ in Au+Au collisions at 62.4 and 200 GeV compared to the $R_{CP}$ of $K^0_S$ and $\Lambda$ at 200 GeV.

The balance function in terms of $\Delta y$ for identified charged pion pairs from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for nine centrality bins.

The balance function in terms of $\Delta y$ for identified charged kaon pairs from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for nine centrality bins.

The balance function for p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The top panel shows the balance function for all charged particles in terms of $\Delta \eta$. The bottom panel gives the balance function for charged pion pairs and charged kaon pairs in terms of $\Delta y$.

The balance function for p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The top panel shows the balance function for all charged particles in terms of $\Delta \eta$. The bottom panel gives the balance function for charged pion pairs and charged kaon pairs in terms of $\Delta y$.

The balance function in terms of $\Delta \eta$ for all charged particles from d+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for three centrality bins.

The balance function in terms of $q_{inv}$ for charged pion pairs from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV in nine centrality bins. Curves correspond to a thermal distribution (Eq. 3) plus $K^{0}_{S}$ decay.

The balance function in terms of $q_{inv}$ for charged-pion pairs in two centrality bins over the range 0 < $q_{inv}$ < 0.2 GeV/c.

The balance function in terms of $q_{inv}$ for charged kaon pairs from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV in nine centrality bins. Curves correspond to a thermal (Eq. 3) distribution plus $\phi$ decay.

The balance function in terms of $q_{inv}$ for charged pion pairs [part a)] and charged kaon pairs [part b)] from p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV integrated over all multiplicities. Solid curves correspond to a thermal distribution (Eq. 3) plus $K^{0}_{S}$ and $\rho^{0}$ decay for pions and φ decay for kaons. The dashed curve for pions represents a fit to a thermal distribution (Eq. 3) plus $K^{0}_{S}$ decay and $\rho^{0}$ decay, with the $\rho^{0}$ mass shifted down by 0.04 $GeV/c^{2}$.

The balance function in terms of $q_{long}$ for charged pion pairs from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV in nine centrality bins.

The balance function in terms of $q_{out}$ for charged pion pairs from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV in nine centrality bins.

(Color online) The balance function in terms of $q_{side}$ for charged pion pairs from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for nine centrality bins.

(Color online) The balance function in terms of $\Delta\phi$ for all charged particles with 0.2< pt<2.0 GeV/c from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV in nine centrality bins.The closed circles represent the real data minus the mixed events.

(Color online) The balance function in terms of $\Delta\phi$ for all charged particles with 1.0< pt<10.0 GeV/c from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV in nine centrality bins.The closed circles represent the real data minus the mixed events.

(Color online) The balance function in terms of $\Delta y$ for charged pions from central collisions of Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV compared with predictions from the blast-wave model from Ref.[30] and filtered HIJING calculations taking into account acceptance and efficiency.

(Color online) The balance function in terms of $\Delta y$ for charged pions from central collisions of Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV compared with predictions from the blast-wave model from Ref.[30] and filtered HIJING calculations taking into account acceptance and efficiency.

(Color online) The balance function in terms of $q_{inv}$ for charged pions from central collisions of Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV compared with predictions from the blast-wave model from Ref.[30] and predictions from filtered HIJING calculations including acceptance and efficiency. For the blast-wave calculations, HBT is not included and the decays of the $K^0_S$ and $\rho^0$ are not shown.

(Color online) The balance function in terms of $q_{inv}$ for charged pions from central collisions of Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV compared with predictions from the blast-wave model from Ref.[30] and predictions from filtered HIJING calculations including acceptance and efficiency. For the blast-wave calculations, HBT is not included and the decays of the $K^0_S$ and $\rho^0$ are not shown.

(Color online) The balance function width $<\Delta\eta>$ for all charged particles from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV compared with the widths of balance functions calculated using shuffled events. Also shown are the balance function widths for p+p and d+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.Filtered HIJING calculations are also shown for the widths of the balance function from p+p and Au+Au collisions. Filtered UrQMD calculations are shown for the widths of the balance function from Au+Au collisions.

(Color online) The balance function width $<\Delta\eta>$ for all charged particles from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV compared with the widths of balance functions calculated using shuffled events. Also shown are the balance function widths for p+p and d+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.Filtered HIJING calculations are also shown for the widths of the balance function from p+p and Au+Au collisions. Filtered UrQMD calculations are shown for the widths of the balance function from Au+Au collisions.

(Color online) The balance function widths for identified charged pions and charged kaons from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV. Filtered HIJING calculations are shown for the same systems. Filtered UrQMD calculations are shown for Au+Au. Also shown is the width of the balance function for pions predicted by the blast-wave model of Ref.[30].

(Color online) The balance function width $\sigma$ extracted from $B(q_{inv})$ for identified charged pions and kaons from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV using a thermal fit (Eq. 3) where $\sigma$ is the width. Filtered HIJING and UrQMD calculations are shown for pions and kaons from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Values are shown for $\sqrt{2mT_{kin}}$ from Au+Au collisions, where m is the mass of a pion or a kaon, and $T_{kin}$ is calculated from identified particle spectra [45]. The width predicted by the blast-wave model of Ref. [30] is also shown for pions.

(Color online) The balance function width $\sigma$ extracted from $B(q_{inv})$ for identified charged pions and kaons from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and p+p collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 200 GeV using a thermal fit (Eq. 3) where $\sigma$ is the width. Filtered HIJING and UrQMD calculations are shown for pions and kaons from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Values are shown for $\sqrt{2mT_{kin}}$ from Au+Au collisions, where m is the mass of a pion or a kaon, and $T_{kin}$ is calculated from identified particle spectra [45]. The width predicted by the blast-wave model of Ref. [30] is also shown for pions.

(Color online) The widths for the balance functions for pions in terms of $q_{long}$, $q_{out}$, and $q_{side}$ compared with UrQMD calculations.

(Color online) The weighted average cosine of the relative azimuthal angle,$<\cos(\Delta\phi)$, extracted from $B(\Delta\phi)$ for all charged particles with $0.2< p_t <2.0$ from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and from all charged particleswith $1.0< p_t <10.0$ GeV/c, compared with predictions using filtered UrQMD calculations.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of moments of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions from Lattice QCD Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 19.6 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations for net-baryon.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations for net-proton (No Decay).

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

Centrality dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV from Transport Model Calculations.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are STAR data.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are from UrQMD net-proton.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are from AMPT default net-proton.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are from AMPT String Melting net-proton.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are from Therminator net-proton.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $\kappa\sigma^2$ for net proton distributions measured at RHIC. The results are from Hijing net-proton.

The angle Delta between the away-side peaks and DeltaPhi = pi for 4 < pT_trig < 6 GeV/c in 0-12% central Au+Au collisions as a function of pT_assoc . Three different parametrisations of the away-side peak shape were used. The errors are statistical errors from the fit.

Near-side (|dphi| < 0.9) associated yield per trigger particle for various trigger particle pT selections as a function of associated pT . Results are shown for 0-12% central Au+Au collisions and for d+Au collisions.

Near-side (|dphi| < 0.9) ratios of the per-trigger associated yields in central Au+Au and d+Au collisions.

Away-side (|dphi| > 0.9) associated yield per trigger particle for various trigger particle pT selections as a function of associated pT . Results are shown for 0-12% central Au+Au collisions and for d+Au collisions.

Away-side (|dphi| > 0.9) ratios of the per-trigger associated yields in central Au+Au and d+Au collisions.

Mean transverse momentum <pT> of associated particles with 0.25 < pT,assoc < 4.0 GeV/c, for four different centrality selections.

Mean transverse momentum <pT> (DeltaPhi) of associated hadrons in the range 0.25 < pT_assoc < 4.0 GeV/c in the core (|DeltaPhi − pi| < pi/6) and cone (pi/6 < |DeltaPhi − pi| < pi/2) azimuthal regions for 3 < pT_trig < 4 GeV/c and 4 < pT_trig < 6 GeV/c as a function of number of participants. The inclusive <pT> in the same pT range for events with a trigger hadron is also indicated.

Fit results from a fit to data using Eq. 11 to parameterize the femtoscopic correlations and Eq. 15 for non-femtoscopic ones (EMCIC fit from Figure 6 in the paper)

Fit results from a fit to 1D correlation function using Eq. 6 to parameterize the femtoscopic correlations (standard fit from Figure 7 in the paper)

Fit results from a fit to 1D correlation function using Eq. 6 to parameterize the femtoscopic correlations and Eq. 12 for non-femtoscopic ones (delta - q fit from Figure 7 in the paper)

Fit results from a fit to 1D correlation function using Eq. 6 to parameterize the femtoscopic correlations and Eq. 15 for non-femtoscopic ones (EMCIC fit from Figure 7 in the paper). The non-femtoscopic parameters M1−4 were not varied, but kept fixed to the values in Table IV

Multiplicity dependence of fit results to 1D correlation function for different fit parameterizations (Figure 8 in the paper).

Multiplicity dependence of fit parameters to two-dimensional correlation functions using Equations 7 and 8. To consistently compare to previous measurements, Omega was set to unity (c.f. Equation 5).