Showing 10 of 3305 results
A search for pseudoscalar or scalar bosons decaying to a top quark pair ($\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$) in final states with one or two charged leptons is presented. The analyzed proton-proton collision data was recorded at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The invariant mass $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ of the reconstructed $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ system and variables sensitive to its spin and parity are used to discriminate against the standard model $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ background. Interference between pseudoscalar or scalar boson production and the standard model $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ continuum is included, leading to peak-dip structures in the $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ distribution. An excess of the data above the background prediction, based on perturbative quantum chromodynamics (QCD) calculations, is observed near the kinematic $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ production threshold, while good agreement is found for high $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. The data are consistent with the background prediction if the contribution from the production of a color-singlet ${}^1\mathrm{S}_0^{[1]}$$\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ quasi-bound state $η_\mathrm{t}$, predicted by nonrelativistic QCD, is added. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are set on the coupling between the pseudoscalar or scalar bosons and the top quark for boson masses in the range 365$-$1000 GeV, relative widths between 0.5 and 25%, and two background scenarios with or without $η_\mathrm{t}$ contribution.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the A resonance signals, as a function of mass.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the A-SM interference signals, as a function of mass.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the H resonance signals, as a function of mass.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the H-SM interference signals, as a function of mass.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the A resonance signals, as a function of mass.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the A-SM interference signals, as a function of mass.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the H resonance signals, as a function of mass.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
LO-to-NNLO K-factors for the H-SM interference signals, as a function of mass.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. No contribution from $t \bar{t}$ bound states is included in the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{A t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the A boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the A boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 0.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 1.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 2.5% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 3.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 4.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 5.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 8.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 10.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 13.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 15.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 18.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 21.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Exclusion limits on the coupling modifier $g_{H t \bar t}$ at 95% CL for the H boson with 25.0% width, as a function of the H boson mass. An $\eta_t$ contribution is added to the background.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 900$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 21.0$% and H, $m_H = 950$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 1000$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 365$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 400$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 550$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 600$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 650$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 700$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 800$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 5.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 500$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 2.0$% and H, $m_H = 750$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 2.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
Observed values of twice the negative log-likelihood with respect to the SM (corresponding to $g_{A t \bar t} = g_{H t \bar t} = 0$) for the simultaneous presence of A, $m_A = 450$ GeV, $\Gamma_A/m_A = 5.0$% and H, $m_H = 850$ GeV, $\Gamma_H/m_H = 21.0$% as a function of the coupling modifiers $g_{A t \bar t}$ and $g_{H t \bar t}$.
A search for Higgs boson pair production in the $b \overline{b} γγ$ final state is performed. The proton-proton collision dataset in this analysis corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 308 fb$^{-1}$, consisting of two samples, 140 fb$^{-1}$ at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and 168 fb$^{-1}$ at 13.6 TeV, recorded between 2015 and 2024 by the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. In addition to a larger dataset, this analysis improves upon the previous search in the same final state through several methodological and technical developments. The Higgs boson pair production cross section divided by the Standard Model prediction is found to be $μ_{HH} = 0.9^{+1.4}_{-1.1}$ ($μ_{HH} = 1^{+1.3}_{-1.0}$ expected), which translates into a 95% confidence-level upper limit of $μ_{HH}<3.8$. At the same confidence level the Higgs self-coupling modifier is constrained to be in the range $-1.7 < κ_λ< 6.6$ ($-1.8 < κ_λ< 6.9$ expected).
Weighted di-photon invariant mass distribution summed over all categories and the two data-taking periods. The events in each category are weighted by $log(1+S_{SM}/B)$. $S_{SM}$ is the expected signal yield assuming $\mu_{HH}$=1, while B is the continuum background yield obtained from a fit to the sidebands plus the single Higgs boson background obtained from simulation, all in a ± 5 GeV window around the Higgs boson mass. The lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding single Higgs boson backgrounds (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
Weighted di-photon invariant mass distribution summed over all categories and the two data-taking periods. The events in each category are weighted by $log(1+S_{SM}/B)$. $S_{SM}$ is the expected signal yield assuming $\mu_{HH}$=1, while B is the continuum background yield obtained from a fit to the sidebands plus the single Higgs boson background obtained from simulation, all in a ± 5 GeV window around the Higgs boson mass. The lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding single Higgs boson backgrounds (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
The 95% CL upper limits on the signal strength, obtained with separate fits to Run-2 and Run-3 data as well as their combination. When computing the significance or upper limit for one data-taking period only, $\mu_{HH}$ of the other period is left free to vary. All other parameters of interest are fixed to their SM expectation.
Observed profile likelihood scans of $\kappa_\lambda$. The scans are performed by varying only the coupling modifier of interest, while all other relevant coupling modifiers are fixed to unity.
Expected profile likelihood scans of $\kappa_\lambda$. The scans are performed by varying only the coupling modifier of interest, while all other relevant coupling modifiers are fixed to unity.
Observed profile likelihood scans of $\kappa_{2V}$. The scans are performed by varying only the coupling modifier of interest, while all other relevant coupling modifiers are fixed to unity.
Expected profile likelihood scans of $\kappa_{2V}$. The scans are performed by varying only the coupling modifier of interest, while all other relevant coupling modifiers are fixed to unity.
Confidence level contours at 68% (solid line) and 95% (dashed line) in the $(\kappa_\lambda, \kappa_{2V})$ parameter space, when all other coupling modifiers are fixed to their SM predictions. The corresponding expected contours are shown by the inner and outer shaded regions The SM prediction is indicated by the star, while the best-fit value is denoted by the cross.
Confidence level contours at 68% (solid line) and 95% (dashed line) in the $(\kappa_\lambda, \kappa_{2V})$ parameter space, when all other coupling modifiers are fixed to their SM predictions. The corresponding expected contours are shown by the inner and outer shaded regions The SM prediction is indicated by the star, while the best-fit value is denoted by the cross.
Observed $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ distributions for the high-mass categories in Run 2. The lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding the single Higgs boson background (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
Observed $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ distributions for the high-mass categories in Run 3. The lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding the single Higgs boson background (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
Observed $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ distributions for the high-mass categories in Run 2. The lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding the single Higgs boson background (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
Observed $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ distributions for the high-mass categories in Run 3. The lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding the single Higgs boson background (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
Observed $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ distributions for the high-mass categories in Run 2. 3he lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding the single Higgs boson background (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
Observed $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ distributions for the high-mass categories in Run 3. The lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding the single Higgs boson background (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
Observed $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ distributions for the low-mass categories in Run 2. The lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding the single Higgs boson background (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
Observed $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ distributions for the low-mass categories in Run 3. The lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding the single Higgs boson background (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
Observed $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ distributions for the low-mass categories in Run 2. The lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding the single Higgs boson background (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
Observed $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ distributions for the low-mass categories in Run 3. The lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding the single Higgs boson background (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
Observed $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ distributions for the low-mass categories in Run 2. The lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding the single Higgs boson background (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
Observed $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ distributions for the low-mass categories in Run 3. The lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding the single Higgs boson background (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
Observed $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ distributions for the low-mass categories in Run 2. The lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding the single Higgs boson background (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
Observed $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ distributions for the low-mass categories in Run 3. The lines show the fit results for the continuum background only (light dotted), adding the single Higgs boson background (black dotted) and the full fit (solid).
Observed and expected profiled likelihood scans on $\kappa_\lambda$ for the low-mass (LM) and high-mass (HM) regions separately and for their combination. The scan is performed by floating the indicated parameter of interest while fixing all the others to their SM value.
Observed and expected profiled likelihood scans on $\kappa_\lambda$ for the low-mass (LM) and high-mass (HM) regions separately and for their combination. The scan is performed by floating the indicated parameter of interest while fixing all the others to their SM value.
Observed and expected profiled likelihood scans on $\kappa_\lambda$ for the low-mass (LM) and high-mass (HM) regions separately and for their combination. The scan is performed by floating the indicated parameter of interest while fixing all the others to their SM value.
Observed and expected profiled likelihood scans on $\kappa_\lambda$ for the low-mass (LM) and high-mass (HM) regions separately and for their combination. The scan is performed by floating the indicated parameter of interest while fixing all the others to their SM value.
Observed and expected profiled likelihood scans on $\kappa_\lambda$ for the low-mass (LM) and high-mass (HM) regions separately and for their combination. The scan is performed by floating the indicated parameter of interest while fixing all the others to their SM value.
Observed and expected profiled likelihood scans on $\kappa_\lambda$ for the low-mass (LM) and high-mass (HM) regions separately and for their combination. The scan is performed by floating the indicated parameter of interest while fixing all the others to their SM value.
The expected number of events (estimated by using simulation) from the SM HH signals and single Higgs boson production, and the expected number of events from the continuum background, evaluated in the 120 GeV < $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ < 130 GeV window in Run 3 for the different low-mass (LM) and high-mass (HM) categories. For comparison, the number of data events is also shown. The uncertainties in the HH signals and single Higgs boson backgrounds include the systematic uncertainties discussed in Section 6. Asymmetric uncertainties arise primarily from the theory calculation of the SM ggF HH cross section and the large uncertainty in the yield of single Higgs bosons produced in ggF events in association with heavy-flavour jets. The uncertainty in the continuum background is given by the sum in quadrature of the statistical uncertainty from the fit to the data and the spurious signal uncertainty.
This paper presents a search for physics beyond the Standard Model targeting a heavy resonance visible in the invariant mass of the lepton-jet system. The analysis focuses on final states with a high-energy lepton and jet, and is optimised for the resonant production of leptoquarks-a novel production mode mediated by the lepton content of the proton originating from quantum fluctuations. Four distinct and orthogonal final states are considered: $e$+light jet, $μ$+light jet, $e$+$b$-jet, and $μ$+$b$-jet, constituting the first search at the Large Hadron Collider for resonantly produced leptoquarks with couplings to electrons and muons. Events with an additional same-flavour lepton, as expected from higher-order diagrams in the signal process, are also included in each channel. The search uses proton-proton collision data from the full Run 2, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$ at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV, and from a part of Run 3 (2022-2023), corresponding to 55 fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s} = 13.6$ TeV. No significant excess over Standard Model predictions is observed. The results are interpreted as exclusion limits on scalar leptoquark ($\tilde{S}_1$) production, substantially improving upon previous ATLAS constraints from leptoquark pair production for large coupling values. The excluded $\tilde{S}_1$ mass ranges depend on the coupling strength, reaching up to 3.4 TeV for quark-lepton couplings $y_{de} = 1.0$, and up to 4.3 TeV, 3.1 TeV, and 2.8 TeV for $y_{sμ}$, $y_{be}$, and $y_{bμ}$ couplings set to 3.5, respectively.
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-ej and (c, d) SR-2L-ej of the e+light-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>de</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 1.0) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>de</sub>) = (3.0 TeV, 1.0), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-ej and (c, d) SR-2L-ej of the e+light-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>de</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 1.0) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>de</sub>) = (3.0 TeV, 1.0), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-ej and (c, d) SR-2L-ej of the e+light-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>de</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 1.0) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>de</sub>) = (3.0 TeV, 1.0), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-ej and (c, d) SR-2L-ej of the e+light-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>de</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 1.0) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>de</sub>) = (3.0 TeV, 1.0), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-μj and (c, d) SR-2L-μj of the μ+light-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>sμ</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 1.5) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>sμ</sub>) = (3.0 TeV, 1.5), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-μj and (c, d) SR-2L-μj of the μ+light-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>sμ</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 1.5) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>sμ</sub>) = (3.0 TeV, 1.5), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-μj and (c, d) SR-2L-μj of the μ+light-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>sμ</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 1.5) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>sμ</sub>) = (3.0 TeV, 1.5), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-μj and (c, d) SR-2L-μj of the μ+light-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>sμ</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 1.5) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>sμ</sub>) = (3.0 TeV, 1.5), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-eb and (c, d) SR-2L-eb of the e+b-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>be</sub>) = (1.5 TeV, 2.5) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>be</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 2.5), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-eb and (c, d) SR-2L-eb of the e+b-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>be</sub>) = (1.5 TeV, 2.5) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>be</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 2.5), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-eb and (c, d) SR-2L-eb of the e+b-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>be</sub>) = (1.5 TeV, 2.5) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>be</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 2.5), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-eb and (c, d) SR-2L-eb of the e+b-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>be</sub>) = (1.5 TeV, 2.5) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>be</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 2.5), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-μb and (c, d) SR-2L-μb of the μ+b-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>bμ</sub>) = (1.5 TeV, 1.5) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>bμ</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 1.5), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-μb and (c, d) SR-2L-μb of the μ+b-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>bμ</sub>) = (1.5 TeV, 1.5) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>bμ</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 1.5), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-μb and (c, d) SR-2L-μb of the μ+b-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>bμ</sub>) = (1.5 TeV, 1.5) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>bμ</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 1.5), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Data (dots) and post-fit SM distribution (histograms) of m<sub>ℓj</sub> in (a, b) SR-1L-μb and (c, d) SR-2L-μb of the μ+b-jet channel obtained by a CR+SR background-only fit for Run 2 and Run 3, respectively. The lower panel shows the ratio of observed data to the total post- and pre-fit SM prediction. The last bin includes the overflow. Uncertainties in the background estimates include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties, with correlations between uncertainties taken into account. The dashed lines show the predicted yields for two benchmark signal models corresponding to S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>bμ</sub>) = (1.5 TeV, 1.5) and S̃<sub>1</sub> (m, y<sub>bμ</sub>) = (2.0 TeV, 1.5), respectively. Note: the values in the table are normalized by the width of corresponding bin
Exclusion limits for minimal models of S̃<sub>1</sub> production with only y<sub>de</sub> being non-zero obtained from a simultaneous fit to SR-1L and SR-2L of the e+light-jet channel combining Run-2 and Run-3 data. All limits are computed at 95% CL and the observed (red solid lines) and expected (black dashed lines) exclusion limits are shown in the m(S̃<sub>1</sub>) – y<sub>de</sub> plane. The observed exclusion should be interpreted as the region above the red line. The yellow inner (green outer) shaded band around the expected limits corresponds to the ±1 σ (±2 σ) variations of the expected limit, accounting for all uncertainties. The observed limit obtained from ATLAS searches for LQ pair production is also shown as dark blue line [13]. Constraints from weak charge measurements of protons and nuclei on y<sub>de</sub> couplings derived by Ref. [10] are shown as light magenta line.
Exclusion limits for minimal models of S̃<sub>1</sub> production with only y<sub>sμ</sub> being non-zero obtained from a simultaneous fit to SR-1L and SR-2L of the μ+light-jet channel combining Run-2 and Run-3 data. All limits are computed at 95% CL and the observed (red solid lines) and expected (black dashed lines) exclusion limits are shown in the m(S̃<sub>1</sub>) – y<sub>sμ</sub> plane. The observed exclusion should be interpreted as the region above the red line. The yellow inner (green outer) shaded band around the expected limits corresponds to the ±1 σ (±2 σ) variations of the expected limit, accounting for all uncertainties. The observed limit obtained from ATLAS searches for LQ pair production is also shown as dark blue line [13].
Exclusion limits for minimal models of S̃<sub>1</sub> production with only y<sub>be</sub> being non-zero obtained from a simultaneous fit to SR-1L and SR-2L of the e+b-jet channel combining Run-2 and Run-3 data. All limits are computed at 95% CL and the observed (red solid lines) and expected (black dashed lines) exclusion limits are shown in the m(S̃<sub>1</sub>) – y<sub>be</sub> plane. The observed exclusion should be interpreted as the region above the red line. The yellow inner (green outer) shaded band around the expected limits corresponds to the ±1 σ (±2 σ) variations of the expected limit, accounting for all uncertainties. The observed limit obtained from ATLAS searches for LQ pair production is also shown as dark blue line [13].
Exclusion limits for minimal models of S̃<sub>1</sub> production with only y<sub>bμ</sub> being non-zero obtained from a simultaneous fit to SR-1L and SR-2L of the μ+b-jet channel combining Run-2 and Run-3 data. All limits are computed at 95% CL and the observed (red solid lines) and expected (black dashed lines) exclusion limits are shown in the m(S̃<sub>1</sub>) – y<sub>bμ</sub> plane. The observed exclusion should be interpreted as the region above the red line. The yellow inner (green outer) shaded band around the expected limits corresponds to the ±1 σ (±2 σ) variations of the expected limit, accounting for all uncertainties. The observed limit obtained from ATLAS searches for LQ pair production is also shown as dark blue line [13].
Exclusion limits for minimal models of S̃<sub>1</sub> production obtained from a fit to SR-1L, SR-2L and their combination of (a) the e+light-jet, (b) the μ+light-jet, (c) the e+b-jet and (d) the μ+b-jet channel using Run-2 and Run-3 data. All limits are computed at 95% CL and the observed (solid lines) and expected (dashed lines) exclusion limits are shown in the m(S̃<sub>1</sub>) – y plane. The observed exclusion regions should be interpreted as the region above the solid lines. Constraints from weak charge measurements of protons and nuclei and ATLAS searches for LQ pair production are shown as light magenta and dark blue areas, respectively.
Exclusion limits for minimal models of S̃<sub>1</sub> production obtained from a fit to SR-1L, SR-2L and their combination of (a) the e+light-jet, (b) the μ+light-jet, (c) the e+b-jet and (d) the μ+b-jet channel using Run-2 and Run-3 data. All limits are computed at 95% CL and the observed (solid lines) and expected (dashed lines) exclusion limits are shown in the m(S̃<sub>1</sub>) – y plane. The observed exclusion regions should be interpreted as the region above the solid lines. Constraints from weak charge measurements of protons and nuclei and ATLAS searches for LQ pair production are shown as light magenta and dark blue areas, respectively.
Exclusion limits for minimal models of S̃<sub>1</sub> production obtained from a fit to SR-1L, SR-2L and their combination of (a) the e+light-jet, (b) the μ+light-jet, (c) the e+b-jet and (d) the μ+b-jet channel using Run-2 and Run-3 data. All limits are computed at 95% CL and the observed (solid lines) and expected (dashed lines) exclusion limits are shown in the m(S̃<sub>1</sub>) – y plane. The observed exclusion regions should be interpreted as the region above the solid lines. Constraints from weak charge measurements of protons and nuclei and ATLAS searches for LQ pair production are shown as light magenta and dark blue areas, respectively.
Exclusion limits for minimal models of S̃<sub>1</sub> production obtained from a fit to SR-1L, SR-2L and their combination of (a) the e+light-jet, (b) the μ+light-jet, (c) the e+b-jet and (d) the μ+b-jet channel using Run-2 and Run-3 data. All limits are computed at 95% CL and the observed (solid lines) and expected (dashed lines) exclusion limits are shown in the m(S̃<sub>1</sub>) – y plane. The observed exclusion regions should be interpreted as the region above the solid lines. Constraints from weak charge measurements of protons and nuclei and ATLAS searches for LQ pair production are shown as light magenta and dark blue areas, respectively.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$ej$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$ej$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1-$ej$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2-$ej$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$ej$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$ej$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1-$ej$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2-$ej$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$ej$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$ej$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1-$ej$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2-$ej$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$ej$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$ej$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1-$ej$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2-$ej$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$ej$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$ej$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1-$ej$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2-$ej$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$ej$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$ej$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1-$ej$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2-$ej$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$ej$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$ej$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1-$ej$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2-$ej$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$ej$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$ej$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1-$ej$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2-$ej$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu j$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu j$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu j$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu j$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu j$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu j$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu j$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu j$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu j$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu j$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu j$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu j$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu j$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu j$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu j$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu j$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu j$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$eb$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$eb$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$eb$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$eb$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$eb$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$eb$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$eb$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$eb$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$eb$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$eb$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$eb$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$eb$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$eb$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$eb$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$eb$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$eb$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$eb$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$eb$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$eb$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$eb$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$eb$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$eb$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$eb$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$eb$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$eb$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$eb$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$eb$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$eb$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$eb$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$eb$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$eb$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$eb$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu b$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu b$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu b$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu b$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu b$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu b$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for resonant production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu b$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu b$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu b$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu b$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu b$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu b$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu b$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu b$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Values of the signal acceptance multiplied by the selection efficiency ($A\times\epsilon$) for DY+SP production of $\tilde{S}$ in (a) Run 2 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (b) Run 2 SR-2L-$\mu b$ and (c) Run 3 SR-1L-$\mu b$ and (d) Run 3 SR-2L-$\mu b$. The $A \times \epsilon$ values are calculated as the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the total cross-section of the signal process times the integrated luminosity.
Event selection cutflows of SR-1L-$eb$ for the signal sample with $m(\tilde{S}) = 2$ TeV and $y_{be} = 1.0$ individually for resonant production (RP) and combined Drell-Yan plus single production (DY+SP). The first number in the column for each mass points corresponds to the signal event yield after applying the associated cut while the second number in parentheses represents the efficiency with respect to the previous cut.
Event selection cutflows of SR-2L-$eb$ for the signal sample with $m(\tilde{S}) = 2$ TeV and $y_{be} = 1.0$ individually for resonant production (RP) and combined Drell-Yan plus single production (DY+SP). The first number in the column for each mass points corresponds to the signal event yield after applying the associated cut while the second number in parentheses represents the efficiency with respect to the previous cut.
Event selection cutflows of SR-1L-$ej$ for the signal sample with $m(\tilde{S}) = 2$ TeV and $y_{de} = 1.0$ individually for resonant production (RP) and combined Drell-Yan plus single production (DY+SP). The first number in the column for each mass points corresponds to the signal event yield after applying the associated cut while the second number in parentheses represents the efficiency with respect to the previous cut.
Event selection cutflows of SR-2L-$ej$ for the signal sample with $m(\tilde{S}) = 2$ TeV and $y_{de} = 1.0$ individually for resonant production (RP) and combined Drell-Yan plus single production (DY+SP). The first number in the column for each mass points corresponds to the signal event yield after applying the associated cut while the second number in parentheses represents the efficiency with respect to the previous cut.
Event selection cutflows of SR-1L-$\mu b$ for the signal sample with $m(\tilde{S}) = 2$ TeV and $y_{b\mu} = 1.0$ individually for resonant production (RP) and combined Drell-Yan plus single production (DY+SP). The first number in the column for each mass points corresponds to the signal event yield after applying the associated cut while the second number in parentheses represents the efficiency with respect to the previous cut.
Event selection cutflows of SR-2L-$\mu b$ for the signal sample with $m(\tilde{S}) = 2$ TeV and $y_{b\mu} = 1.0$ individually for resonant production (RP) and combined Drell-Yan plus single production (DY+SP). The first number in the column for each mass points corresponds to the signal event yield after applying the associated cut while the second number in parentheses represents the efficiency with respect to the previous cut.
Event selection cutflows of SR-1L-$\mu j$ for the signal sample with $m(\tilde{S}) = 2$ TeV and $y_{s\mu} = 1.0$ individually for resonant production (RP) and combined Drell-Yan plus single production (DY+SP). The first number in the column for each mass points corresponds to the signal event yield after applying the associated cut while the second number in parentheses represents the efficiency with respect to the previous cut.
Event selection cutflows of SR-2L-$\mu j$ for the signal sample with $m(\tilde{S}) = 2$ TeV and $y_{s\mu} = 1.0$ individually for resonant production (RP) and combined Drell-Yan plus single production (DY+SP). The first number in the column for each mass points corresponds to the signal event yield after applying the associated cut while the second number in parentheses represents the efficiency with respect to the previous cut.
A measurement of the top-quark pole mass $m_{t}^\text{pole}$ is presented in $t\bar{t}$ events with an additional jet, $t\bar{t}+1\text{-jet}$, produced in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV. The data sample, recorded with the ATLAS experiment during Run 2 of the LHC, corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 140 $\text{fb}^{-1}$. Events with one electron and one muon of opposite electric charge in the final state are selected to measure the $t\bar{t}+1\text{-jet}$ differential cross-section as a function of the inverse of the invariant mass of the $t\bar{t}+1\text{-jet}$ system. Iterative Bayesian Unfolding is used to correct the data to enable comparison with fixed-order calculations at next-to-leading-order accuracy in the strong coupling. The process $pp \to t\bar{t}j$ ($2 \rightarrow 3$), where top quarks are taken as stable particles, and the process $pp \to b\bar{b}l^+νl^- \barν j$ ($2 \to 7$), which includes top-quark decays to the dilepton final state and off-shell effects, are considered. The top-quark mass is extracted using a $χ^2$ fit of the unfolded normalized differential cross-section distribution. The results obtained with the $2 \to 3$ and $2 \to 7$ calculations are compatible within theoretical uncertainties, providing an important consistency check. The more precise determination is obtained for the $2 \to 3 $ measurement: $m_{t}^\text{pole}=170.7\pm0.3(\text{stat.})\pm1.4(\text{syst.})\pm 0.3(\text{scale})\pm 0.2(\text{PDF}\oplusα_\text{S})$ GeV, which is in good agreement with other top-quark mass results.
Unfolded number of events in the 2-to-3measurement (not normalized). The parton level is defined with two stable top-quarks and a jet with $p_{T}>50$ GeV and $|\eta|<2.5$.
Covariance matrix for statistical effects of the measured number of events after unfolding, for the 2-to-3 measurement (not normalized)
Covariance matrix for statistical and systematic effects of the measured number of events after unfolding, for the 2-to-3 measurement (not normalized)
Unfolded $R(\rho_{s})$ observable in the 2-to-3 measurement (normalized and divided by bin width). The parton level is defined with two stable top-quarks and a jet with $p_{T}>50$ GeV and $|\eta|<2.5$.
Covariance matrix for statistical effects of the measured $R(\rho_{s})$ observable after unfolding, for the 2-to-3 measurement (normalized)
Covariance matrix for statistical and systematic effects of the measured $R(\rho_{s})$ observable after unfolding, for the 2-to-3 measurement (normalized)
Impact of systematic uncertainties on the 2-to-3 unfolded observable. Values are given in percentage of bin content.
Central value and breakdown of the uncertainties affecting the top-quark pole mass extraction from the 2-to-3 unfolded observable.
Unfolded number of events in the 2-to-7measurement (not normalized). The parton level is defined with two neutrinos, one electron and one muon of opposite electric charges, two $b$-jets and an additional jet (extrajet). The four-momentum of the sum of neutrinos has transverse component larger than 30 GeV. The $p_{T}$-leading lepton has $p_{T}>28$ GeV, while the sub-leading has $p_{T}>20$ GeV. The two $b$-jets with have $p_{T}>30$ GeV and the extrajet has $p^\text{extrajet}_{T}>60$ GeV. All the leptons and jets are separated by $\Delta R >0.4$ and have $|\eta|<2.5$.
Covariance matrix for statistical effects of the measured number of events after unfolding, for the 2-to-7 measurement (not normalized)
Covariance matrix for statistical and systematic effects of the measured number of events after unfolding, for the 2-to-7 measurement (not normalized)
Unfolded $R(\rho_{s})$ observable in the 2-to-7 measurement (normalized and divided by bin width). The parton level is defined with two neutrinos, one electron and one muon of opposite electric charges, two $b$-jets and an additional jet (extrajet). The four-momentum of the sum of neutrinos has transverse component larger than 30 GeV. The $p_{T}$-leading lepton has $p_{T}>28$ GeV, while the sub-leading has $p_{T}>20$ GeV. The two $b$-jets with have $p_{T}>30$ GeV and the extrajet has $p^\text{extrajet}_{T}>60$ GeV. All the leptons and jets are separated by $\Delta R >0.4$ and have $|\eta|<2.5$.
Covariance matrix for statistical effects of the measured $R(\rho_{s})$ observable after unfolding, for the 2-to-7 measurement (normalized)
Covariance matrix for statistical and systematic effects of the measured $R(\rho_{s})$ observable after unfolding, for the 2-to-7 measurement (normalized)
Impact of systematic uncertainties on the 2-to-7 unfolded observable. Values are given in percentage of bin content.
Central value and breakdown of the uncertainties affecting the top-quark pole mass extraction from the 2-to-7 unfolded observable.
The results of a search for the production of two scalar bosons in final states with two photons and two tau leptons are presented. The search considers both nonresonant production of a Higgs boson pair, HH, and resonant production via a new boson X which decays either to HH or to H and a new scalar Y. The analysis uses up to 138 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data, recorded between 2016 and 2018 by the CMS experiment at the LHC at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. No evidence for signal is found in the data. For the nonresonant production, the observed (expected) upper limit at 95% confidence level (CL) on the HH production cross section is set at 930 (740) fb, corresponding to 33 (26) times the standard model prediction. At 95% CL, HH production is observed (expected) to be excluded for values of $κ_λ$ outside the range between $-$12 ($-$9.4) and 17 (15). Observed (expected) upper limits at 95% CL for the XHH cross section are found to be within 160 to 2200 (200 to 1800) fb, depending on the mass of X. In the X $\to$ Y($γγ$)H($ττ$) search, the observed (expected) upper limits on the product of the production cross section and decay branching fractions vary between 0.059$-$1.2 fb (0.087$-$0.68 fb). For the X $\to$ Y($γγ$)H($ττ$) search the observed (expected) upper limits on the product of the production cross section and Y $to$ $γγ$ branching fraction vary between 0.69$-$15 fb (0.73$-$8.3 fb) in the low Y mass search, tightening constraints on the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, and between 0.64$-$10 fb (0.70$-$7.6 fb) in the high Y mass search.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the nonresonant $\mathrm{HH}$ production cross section, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{HH})$, as a function of the Higgs boson self-coupling strength modifier $\kappa_\lambda$. All Higgs boson couplings other than $\lambda$ are assumed to have the values predicted in the SM.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the nonresonant $\mathrm{HH}$ production cross section, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{HH})$, for thirteen different BSM benchmark scenarios from [arXiv:1507.02245, arXiv:1806.05162] which consider different values of the couplings, $\kappa_\lambda$, $\kappa_t$, $c_{2g}$, $c_g$, and $c_2$ (defined in Table 1).
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new spin-0 particle $\mathrm{X}^{(0)}$ which decays to Higgs boson pairs, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X}^{(0)} \to \mathrm{HH})$, given for different values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 260-1000 GeV.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new spin-2 particle $\mathrm{X}^{(2)}$ which decays to Higgs boson pairs, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X}^{(2)} \to \mathrm{HH})$, given for different values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 260-1000 GeV.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$ which subsequently decay to a pair of photons and a pair of tau leptons, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH} \to \gamma\gamma\tau\tau)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 50-800 GeV and at particular values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-1000 GeV.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$ which subsequently decay to a pair of photons and a pair of tau leptons, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH} \to \gamma\gamma\tau\tau)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-1000 GeV and at particular values of $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 50-800 GeV.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$ which subsequently decay to a pair of photons and a pair of tau leptons, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH} \to \gamma\gamma\tau\tau)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-1000 GeV and $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 50-800 GeV.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$, multiplied by the $\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma$ branching fraction, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH})B(\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 70-125 GeV and at particular values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-1000 GeV.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$, multiplied by the $\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma$ branching fraction, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH})B(\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-800 GeV and at particular values of $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 70-125 GeV.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$, multiplied by the $\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma$ branching fraction, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH})B(\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-1000 GeV and $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 70-125 GeV.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$, multiplied by the $\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma$ branching fraction, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH})B(\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 125-800 GeV and at particular values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-1000 GeV.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$, multiplied by the $\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma$ branching fraction, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH})B(\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-800 GeV and at particular values of $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 125-800 GeV.
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$, multiplied by the $\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma$ branching fraction, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH})B(\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-1000 GeV and $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 125-800 GeV.
A search for single production of a vector-like quark $Q$, which could be either a singlet $T$, with charge $\tfrac23$, or a $Y$ from a $(T,B,Y)$ triplet, with charge $-\tfrac43$, is performed using data from proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data correspond to the full integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$ recorded with the ATLAS detector during Run 2 of the Large Hadron Collider. The analysis targets $Q \to Wb$ decays where the $W$ boson decays leptonically. The data are found to be consistent with the expected Standard Model background, so upper limits are set on the cross-section times branching ratio, and on the coupling of the $Q$ to the Standard Model sector for these two benchmark models. Effects of interference with the Standard Model background are taken into account. For the singlet $T$, the 95% confidence level limit on the coupling strength $κ$ ranges between 0.22 and 0.52 for masses from 1150 to 2300 GeV. For the $(T,B,Y)$ triplet, the limits on $κ$ vary from 0.14 to 0.46 for masses from 1150 to 2600 GeV.
Distributions of the VLQ-candidate mass, m<sub>VLQ</sub>, in the (a–c) SRs, (d–f) W+jets CRs and (g–i) tt̄ CRs after the fit to the background-only hypothesis. The columns correspond from left to right to the low-, middle-, and high-p<sub>T</sub><sup>W</sup> bins in each region. Other includes remaining backgrounds from top quarks or that contain two W/Z bosons. The last bin includes overflow. Note: the 'Data' values in the table are normalized by the width of the bin to correspond to the number of events per 100 GeV
Distributions of the VLQ-candidate mass, m<sub>VLQ</sub>, in the (a–c) SRs, (d–f) W+jets CRs and (g–i) tt̄ CRs after the fit to the background-only hypothesis. The columns correspond from left to right to the low-, middle-, and high-p<sub>T</sub><sup>W</sup> bins in each region. Other includes remaining backgrounds from top quarks or that contain two W/Z bosons. The last bin includes overflow. Note: the 'Data' values in the table are normalized by the width of the bin to correspond to the number of events per 100 GeV
Distributions of the VLQ-candidate mass, m<sub>VLQ</sub>, in the (a–c) SRs, (d–f) W+jets CRs and (g–i) tt̄ CRs after the fit to the background-only hypothesis. The columns correspond from left to right to the low-, middle-, and high-p<sub>T</sub><sup>W</sup> bins in each region. Other includes remaining backgrounds from top quarks or that contain two W/Z bosons. The last bin includes overflow. Note: the 'Data' values in the table are normalized by the width of the bin to correspond to the number of events per 100 GeV
Distributions of the VLQ-candidate mass, m<sub>VLQ</sub>, in the (a–c) SRs, (d–f) W+jets CRs and (g–i) tt̄ CRs after the fit to the background-only hypothesis. The columns correspond from left to right to the low-, middle-, and high-p<sub>T</sub><sup>W</sup> bins in each region. Other includes remaining backgrounds from top quarks or that contain two W/Z bosons. The last bin includes overflow. Note: the 'Data' values in the table are normalized by the width of the bin to correspond to the number of events per 100 GeV
Distributions of the VLQ-candidate mass, m<sub>VLQ</sub>, in the (a–c) SRs, (d–f) W+jets CRs and (g–i) tt̄ CRs after the fit to the background-only hypothesis. The columns correspond from left to right to the low-, middle-, and high-p<sub>T</sub><sup>W</sup> bins in each region. Other includes remaining backgrounds from top quarks or that contain two W/Z bosons. The last bin includes overflow. Note: the 'Data' values in the table are normalized by the width of the bin to correspond to the number of events per 100 GeV
Distributions of the VLQ-candidate mass, m<sub>VLQ</sub>, in the (a–c) SRs, (d–f) W+jets CRs and (g–i) tt̄ CRs after the fit to the background-only hypothesis. The columns correspond from left to right to the low-, middle-, and high-p<sub>T</sub><sup>W</sup> bins in each region. Other includes remaining backgrounds from top quarks or that contain two W/Z bosons. The last bin includes overflow. Note: the 'Data' values in the table are normalized by the width of the bin to correspond to the number of events per 100 GeV
Distributions of the VLQ-candidate mass, m<sub>VLQ</sub>, in the (a–c) SRs, (d–f) W+jets CRs and (g–i) tt̄ CRs after the fit to the background-only hypothesis. The columns correspond from left to right to the low-, middle-, and high-p<sub>T</sub><sup>W</sup> bins in each region. Other includes remaining backgrounds from top quarks or that contain two W/Z bosons. The last bin includes overflow. Note: the 'Data' values in the table are normalized by the width of the bin to correspond to the number of events per 100 GeV
Distributions of the VLQ-candidate mass, m<sub>VLQ</sub>, in the (a–c) SRs, (d–f) W+jets CRs and (g–i) tt̄ CRs after the fit to the background-only hypothesis. The columns correspond from left to right to the low-, middle-, and high-p<sub>T</sub><sup>W</sup> bins in each region. Other includes remaining backgrounds from top quarks or that contain two W/Z bosons. The last bin includes overflow. Note: the 'Data' values in the table are normalized by the width of the bin to correspond to the number of events per 100 GeV
Distributions of the VLQ-candidate mass, m<sub>VLQ</sub>, in the (a–c) SRs, (d–f) W+jets CRs and (g–i) tt̄ CRs after the fit to the background-only hypothesis. The columns correspond from left to right to the low-, middle-, and high-p<sub>T</sub><sup>W</sup> bins in each region. Other includes remaining backgrounds from top quarks or that contain two W/Z bosons. The last bin includes overflow. Note: the 'Data' values in the table are normalized by the width of the bin to correspond to the number of events per 100 GeV
Distributions of the VLQ-candidate mass, m<sub>VLQ</sub>, in the W+jets VRs (a-f) and tt̄ VRs (g-i) after the fit to the background-only hypothesis. The columns correspond from left to right to the low-, middle-, and high-p<sub>T</sub><sup>W</sup> bins in each region. Other includes remaining backgrounds from top quarks or containing combinations having two W/Z bosons. Last bin includes overflow. Note: the 'Data' values in the table are normalized by the width of the bin to correspond to the number of events per 100 GeV
Distributions of the VLQ-candidate mass, m<sub>VLQ</sub>, in the W+jets VRs (a-f) and tt̄ VRs (g-i) after the fit to the background-only hypothesis. The columns correspond from left to right to the low-, middle-, and high-p<sub>T</sub><sup>W</sup> bins in each region. Other includes remaining backgrounds from top quarks or containing combinations having two W/Z bosons. Last bin includes overflow. Note: the 'Data' values in the table are normalized by the width of the bin to correspond to the number of events per 100 GeV
Distributions of the VLQ-candidate mass, m<sub>VLQ</sub>, in the W+jets VRs (a-f) and tt̄ VRs (g-i) after the fit to the background-only hypothesis. The columns correspond from left to right to the low-, middle-, and high-p<sub>T</sub><sup>W</sup> bins in each region. Other includes remaining backgrounds from top quarks or containing combinations having two W/Z bosons. Last bin includes overflow. Note: the 'Data' values in the table are normalized by the width of the bin to correspond to the number of events per 100 GeV
Distributions of the VLQ-candidate mass, m<sub>VLQ</sub>, in the W+jets VRs (a-f) and tt̄ VRs (g-i) after the fit to the background-only hypothesis. The columns correspond from left to right to the low-, middle-, and high-p<sub>T</sub><sup>W</sup> bins in each region. Other includes remaining backgrounds from top quarks or containing combinations having two W/Z bosons. Last bin includes overflow. Note: the 'Data' values in the table are normalized by the width of the bin to correspond to the number of events per 100 GeV
Distributions of the VLQ-candidate mass, m<sub>VLQ</sub>, in the W+jets VRs (a-f) and tt̄ VRs (g-i) after the fit to the background-only hypothesis. The columns correspond from left to right to the low-, middle-, and high-p<sub>T</sub><sup>W</sup> bins in each region. Other includes remaining backgrounds from top quarks or containing combinations having two W/Z bosons. Last bin includes overflow. Note: the 'Data' values in the table are normalized by the width of the bin to correspond to the number of events per 100 GeV
Distributions of the VLQ-candidate mass, m<sub>VLQ</sub>, in the W+jets VRs (a-f) and tt̄ VRs (g-i) after the fit to the background-only hypothesis. The columns correspond from left to right to the low-, middle-, and high-p<sub>T</sub><sup>W</sup> bins in each region. Other includes remaining backgrounds from top quarks or containing combinations having two W/Z bosons. Last bin includes overflow. Note: the 'Data' values in the table are normalized by the width of the bin to correspond to the number of events per 100 GeV
Expected (background-only) and observed 95% CL upper limits on the VLQ coupling κ as functions of the VLQ mass m<sub>Q</sub>, for T-singlet (a) and Y-triplet (b) vector-like quarks. The green and yellow bands indicate the systematic uncertainties which are profiled in the fit for the observed upper limits. For the T-singlet model, the result of the latest ATLAS combination of searches for single vector-like top-quarks is overlaid; this includes the decay modes T→H t and T→Z t. These interpretations are limited to parameter combinations for which the model corrections are valid, by restricting the VLQ relative width to Γ<sub>Q</sub>/m<sub>Q</sub> < 0.5, as indicated by the grey dashed line.
Expected (background-only) and observed 95% CL upper limits on the VLQ coupling κ as functions of the VLQ mass m<sub>Q</sub>, for T-singlet (a) and Y-triplet (b) vector-like quarks. The green and yellow bands indicate the systematic uncertainties which are profiled in the fit for the observed upper limits. For the T-singlet model, the result of the latest ATLAS combination of searches for single vector-like top-quarks is overlaid; this includes the decay modes T→H t and T→Z t. These interpretations are limited to parameter combinations for which the model corrections are valid, by restricting the VLQ relative width to Γ<sub>Q</sub>/m<sub>Q</sub> < 0.5, as indicated by the grey dashed line.
Exclusion limit (at 95% CL) for (a) T-singlet and (b) Y-triplet, expressed in terms of an upper limit on the VLQ relative width Γ<sub>Q</sub>/m<sub>Q</sub>, within its validity range for the modelling used, as a function of the VLQ mass m<sub>Q</sub>. This is an alternative presentation of the upper limit set in terms of the coupling κ in Figure 6. As can be seen by the fact the interference-included and signal-only exclusion curves overlap almost entirely, the effect of neglecting the interference is negligible for the vector-like Y-quark.
Exclusion limit (at 95% CL) for (a) T-singlet and (b) Y-triplet, expressed in terms of an upper limit on the VLQ relative width Γ<sub>Q</sub>/m<sub>Q</sub>, within its validity range for the modelling used, as a function of the VLQ mass m<sub>Q</sub>. This is an alternative presentation of the upper limit set in terms of the coupling κ in Figure 6. As can be seen by the fact the interference-included and signal-only exclusion curves overlap almost entirely, the effect of neglecting the interference is negligible for the vector-like Y-quark.
A search for nonresonant new physics phenomena in high-mass dilepton events produced in association with b-tagged jets is performed using proton-proton collision data collected in 2016$-$2018 by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC, at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The analysis considers two effective field theory models with dimension-six operators; involving four-fermion contact interactions between two leptons ($\ell\ell$, electrons or muons) and b or s quarks (bb$\ell\ell$ and bs$\ell\ell$). Two lepton flavor combinations (ee and $μμ$) are required and events are classified as having 0, 1, and $\geq$2 b-tagged jets in the final state. No significant excess is observed over the standard model backgrounds. Upper limits are set on the production cross section of the new physics signals. These translate into lower limits on the energy scale $Λ$ of 6.9 to 9.0 TeV in the bb$\ell\ell$ model, depending on model parameters, and on the ratio of energy scale and effective coupling, $Λ/g_*$, of 2.0 to 2.6 TeV in the bs$\ell\ell$ model. The latter represent the most stringent limits on this model to date. Lepton flavor universality is also tested by comparing the dielectron and dimuon mass spectra for different b-tagged jet multiplicities. No significant deviation from the standard model expectation of unity is observed.
Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dimuon channel for different bbll signal scenarios
Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dimuon channel for different bbll (destructive interference) signal scenarios
Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dimuon channel in 1b final state for different bbll signal scenarios
Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dimuon channel in 1b final state for different bbll (destructive interference) signal scenarios
Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dimuon channel in 2b final state for different bbll signal scenarios
Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dimuon channel in 2b final state for different bbll (destructive interference) signal scenarios
Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dielectron channel for different bbll signal scenarios
Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dielectron channel for different bbll (destructive interference) signal scenarios
Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dielectron channel in 1b final state for different bbll signal scenarios
Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dielectron channel in 1b final state for different bbll (destructive interference) signal scenarios
Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dielectron channel in 2b final state for different bbll signal scenarios
Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dielectron channel in 2b final state for different bbll (destructive interference) signal scenarios
Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dimuon channel for bsll signal
Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dielectron channel for bsll signal
Observed and expected background yields for different mass ranges in the dielectron channel in 0 b jet final state. The sum of all background contributions is shown as well as a breakdown into the four main categories. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components.
Observed and expected background yields for different mass ranges in the dielectron channel in 1 b jet final state. The sum of all background contributions is shown as well as a breakdown into the four main categories. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components.
Observed and expected background yields for different mass ranges in the dielectron channel in 2 b jet final state. The sum of all background contributions is shown as well as a breakdown into the four main categories. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components.
Observed and expected background yields for different mass ranges in the dimuon channel in 0 b jet final state. The sum of all background contributions is shown as well as a breakdown into the four main categories. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components.
Observed and expected background yields for different mass ranges in the dimuon channel in 1 b jet final state. The sum of all background contributions is shown as well as a breakdown into the four main categories. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components.
Observed and expected background yields for different mass ranges in the dimuon channel in 2 b jet final state. The sum of all background contributions is shown as well as a breakdown into the four main categories. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components.
Measured flavor ratio from DY+jets MC and data in 0b channel. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components. The flavor ratio from DY+jets MC deviates slightly from unity as the ratio is not corrected for mass-dependent acceptance times efficiency.
Measured flavor ratio from DY+jets MC and data in 1b+2b channel. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components. The flavor ratio from DY+jets MC deviates slightly from unity as the ratio is not corrected for mass-dependent acceptance times efficiency.
Lower limits on the energy scale ($\Lambda$) at 95% CL for bbll signal with different chirality and interference assumptions in the dielectron channel combining all b jet final states. The limits are obtained for $m_{ee}>300$ GeV.
Lower limits on the energy scale ($\Lambda$) at 95% CL for bbll signal with different chirality and interference assumptions in the dimuon channel combining all b jet final states. The limits are obtained for $m_{\mu\mu}>300$ GeV.
Lower limits on the energy scale ($\Lambda$) at 95% CL for bbll signal with different chirality and interference assumptions in the combined (dimuon+dielectron) channel combining all b jet final states. The limits are obtained for $m_{\ell\ell}>300$ GeV.
Observed and Expected upper limits on the product of the production cross section for the bsll signal in the dielectron and dimuon channels for 0 b-tagged jets.
Observed and Expected upper limits on the product of the production cross section for the bsll signal in the dielectron and dimuon channels for 1 b-tagged jets.
Ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions create a quark-gluon plasma (QGP), a hot and dense state of strongly interacting QCD matter. In ultracentral collisions, the QGP volume remains nearly constant event-by-event, while its total entropy can fluctuate due to quantum effects, leading to temperature variations. These features allow the correlation between the mean transverse momentum $(\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle)$ of charged hadrons and their multiplicity to serve as a probe of the QGP's speed of sound, $c_{s}$. This study extracts $c_{s}$ by analyzing the relative increase in $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle$ with respect to the charged-particle density $(\langle \mathrm{d}N_\mathrm{ch}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle)$ at midrapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$, using data from the ALICE detector. Centrality is determined with estimators based on multiplicity and transverse energy, applying a pseudorapidity gap to reduce selection biases. The extracted value of $c_{s}^{2}$ is found to strongly depend on the employed centrality estimator and ranges between $0.1146 \pm 0.0028 \,\mathrm{(stat.)} \pm 0.0065 \,\mathrm{(syst.)}$ and $0.4374 \pm 0.0006 \mathrm{(stat.)} \pm 0.0184 \mathrm{(syst.)}$ in natural units. Additionally, the event-by-event $[p_{\mathrm{T}}]$ distribution is studied through its variance, skewness, and kurtosis. A pronounced decrease in the self-normalized variance and a peak followed by a drop in skewness suggest the suppression of impact-parameter fluctuations in ultracentral collisions. These observations provide new insights into the thermodynamic properties and initial-state fluctuations of the QGP.
Average number of participating nucleons ($\langle N_{\mathrm{part}} \rangle$) as a function of centrality percentile in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimators based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$, ${N_{\mathrm{tracklets}}}$, and $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ within $|\eta|\leq 0.8$.
Average number of participating nucleons ($\langle N_{\mathrm{part}} \rangle$) as a function of centrality percentile in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}} \in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
Normalized $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-spectrum ratio as a function as a function of centrality in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}} \in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta|\leq 0.8$.
Normalized $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-spectrum ratio as a function as a function of centrality in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}} \in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta|\leq 0.8$.
Normalized $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-spectrum ratio as a function as a function of centrality in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{tracklets}} \in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta|\leq 0.8$.
Normalized $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-spectrum ratio as a function as a function of centrality in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}} \in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
Event fraction distribution as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}} \in -3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
Event fraction distribution as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}} \in |\eta|\leq 0.8$.
Event fraction distribution as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}} \in |\eta|\leq 0.8$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta| \leq 0.8$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta| \leq 0.8$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{tracklets}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{tracklets}}$ $\in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta| \leq 0.8$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{tracklets}}$ $\in$ $0.3 \leq |\eta| \leq 0.6$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{tracklets}}$ $\in$ $0.7 \leq |\eta| \leq 1$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
Extracted $c_{\mathrm{s}}^{2}$ as a function of the minimum pseudorapidity gap between the centrality estimation and transverse-momentum spectra measurement in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$.
$k_{2}/k_{2}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$k_{2}/k_{2}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$k_{2}/k_{2}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
$k_{3}/k_{3}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$k_{3}/k_{3}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$k_{3}/k_{3}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
$\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
$\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] angle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
$\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.
$\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.
Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta| \leq 0.8$ with $0.45 \leq p_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 50~\mathrm{GeV}/c.$.
Several new physics models including versions of supersymmetry (SUSY) characterized by $R$-parity violation (RPV) or with additional hidden sectors predict the production of events with top quarks, low missing transverse momentum, and many additional quarks or gluons. The results of a search for top squarks decaying to two top quarks and six additional light-flavor quarks or gluons are reported. The search employs a novel machine learning method for background estimation from control samples in data using decorrelated discriminators. The search is performed using events with 0, 1, or 2 electrons or muons in conjunction with at least six jets. No requirement is placed on the magnitude of the missing transverse momentum. The result is based on a sample of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV corresponding to 138 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity collected with the CMS detector at the LHC in 2016$-$2018. The data are used to determine upper limits on the top squark pair production cross section in the frameworks of RPV and stealth SUSY. Models with top squark masses less than 700 (930) GeV are excluded at 95% confidence level for RPV (stealth) SUSY scenarios.
Cutflows and signal efficiencies for the RPV SUSY model in the $0\ell$ channel corresponding to two values of $m_{\tilde{t}}$.
Cutflows and signal efficiencies for the Stealth SYY SUSY model in the $0\ell$ channel corresponding to two values of $m_{\tilde{t}}$.
Cutflows and signal efficiencies for the RPV SUSY model in the $1\ell$ channel corresponding to two values of $m_{\tilde{t}}$.
Cutflows and signal efficiencies for the Stealth SYY SUSY model in the $1\ell$ channel corresponding to two values of $m_{\tilde{t}}$.
Cutflows and signal efficiencies for the RPV SUSY model in the $2\ell$ channel corresponding to two values of $m_{\tilde{t}}$.
Cutflows and signal efficiencies for the Stealth SYY SUSY model in the $2\ell$ channel corresponding to two values of $m_{\tilde{t}}$.
Signal efficiencies for the RPV SUSY model in the $0\ell$ channel corresponding to the four ABCD regions
Signal efficiencies for the SYY SUSY model in the $0\ell$ channel corresponding to the four ABCD regions
Signal efficiencies for the RPV SUSY model in the $1\ell$ channel corresponding to the four ABCD regions
Signal efficiencies for the SYY SUSY model in the $1\ell$ channel corresponding to the four ABCD regions
Signal efficiencies for the RPV SUSY model in the $2\ell$ channel corresponding to the four ABCD regions
Signal efficiencies for the SYY SUSY model in the $2\ell$ channel corresponding to the four ABCD regions
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limit on the top squark pair production cross section as a function of the top squark mass for the RPV SUSY model in the $0\ell$ channel
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limit on the top squark pair production cross section as a function of the top squark mass for the RPV SUSY model in the $1\ell$ channel
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limit on the top squark pair production cross section as a function of the top squark mass for the RPV SUSY model in the $2\ell$ channel
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limit on the top squark pair production cross section as a function of the top squark mass for the RPV SUSY model in the Combo channel
The $N_{jets}$ distributions from the background-only fits to data in the $0\ell$. The signal distribution overlaid corresponds to the RPV model with $m_{\tilde{t}} = 400$ GeV with the signal strength parameter $r$ set to one. The four pannels in each row show the $N_{jets}$ distributions for the A, B, C, and D regions (left to right).
The $N_{jets}$ distributions from the background-only fits to data in the $1\ell$. The signal distribution overlaid corresponds to the RPV model with $m_{\tilde{t}} = 400$ GeV with the signal strength parameter $r$ set to one. The four pannels in each row show the $N_{jets}$ distributions for the A, B, C, and D regions (left to right).
The $N_{jets}$ distributions from the background-only fits to data in the $2\ell$. The signal distribution overlaid corresponds to the RPV model with $m_{\tilde{t}} = 400$ GeV with the signal strength parameter $r$ set to one. The four pannels in each row show the $N_{jets}$ distributions for the A, B, C, and D regions (left to right).
The $N_{jets}$ distributions from the background-only fits to data in the $0\ell$. The signal distribution overlaid corresponds to the RPV model with $m_{\tilde{t}} = 800$ GeV with the signal strength parameter $r$ set to one. The four pannels in each row show the $N_{jets}$ distributions for the A, B, C, and D regions (left to right).
The $N_{jets}$ distributions from the background-only fits to data in the $1\ell$. The signal distribution overlaid corresponds to the RPV model with $m_{\tilde{t}} = 800$ GeV with the signal strength parameter $r$ set to one. The four pannels in each row show the $N_{jets}$ distributions for the A, B, C, and D regions (left to right).
The $N_{jets}$ distributions from the background-only fits to data in the $2\ell$. The signal distribution overlaid corresponds to the RPV model with $m_{\tilde{t}} = 800$ GeV with the signal strength parameter $r$ set to one. The four pannels in each row show the $N_{jets}$ distributions for the A, B, C, and D regions (left to right).
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limit on the top squark pair production cross section as a function of the top squark mass for the SYY SUSY model in the $0\ell$ channel
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limit on the top squark pair production cross section as a function of the top squark mass for the SYY SUSY model in the $1\ell$ channel
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limit on the top squark pair production cross section as a function of the top squark mass for the SYY SUSY model in the $2\ell$ channel
Expected and observed 95% CL upper limit on the top squark pair production cross section as a function of the top squark mass for the SYY SUSY model in the Combo channel
The $N_{jets}$ distributions from the background-only fits to data in the $0\ell$. The signal distribution overlaid corresponds to the Stealth SYY model with $m_{\tilde{t}} = 400$ GeV with the signal strength parameter $r$ set to one. The four pannels in each row show the $N_{jets}$ distributions for the A, B, C, and D regions (left to right).
The $N_{jets}$ distributions from the background-only fits to data in the $1\ell$. The signal distribution overlaid corresponds to the Stealth SYY model with $m_{\tilde{t}} = 400$ GeV with the signal strength parameter $r$ set to one. The four pannels in each row show the $N_{jets}$ distributions for the A, B, C, and D regions (left to right).
The $N_{jets}$ distributions from the background-only fits to data in the $2\ell$. The signal distribution overlaid corresponds to the Stealth SYY model with $m_{\tilde{t}} = 400$ GeV with the signal strength parameter $r$ set to one. The four pannels in each row show the $N_{jets}$ distributions for the A, B, C, and D regions (left to right).
The $N_{jets}$ distributions from the background-only fits to data in the $0\ell$. The signal distribution overlaid corresponds to the Stealth SYY model with $m_{\tilde{t}} = 800$ GeV with the signal strength parameter $r$ set to one. The four pannels in each row show the $N_{jets}$ distributions for the A, B, C, and D regions (left to right).
The $N_{jets}$ distributions from the background-only fits to data in the $1\ell$. The signal distribution overlaid corresponds to the Stealth SYY model with $m_{\tilde{t}} = 800$ GeV with the signal strength parameter $r$ set to one. The four pannels in each row show the $N_{jets}$ distributions for the A, B, C, and D regions (left to right).
The $N_{jets}$ distributions from the background-only fits to data in the $2\ell$. The signal distribution overlaid corresponds to the Stealth SYY model with $m_{\tilde{t}} = 800$ GeV with the signal strength parameter $r$ set to one. The four pannels in each row show the $N_{jets}$ distributions for the A, B, C, and D regions (left to right).
The traditional quark model accounts for the existence of baryons, such as protons and neutrons, which consist of three quarks, as well as mesons, composed of a quark-antiquark pair. Only recently has substantial evidence started to accumulate for exotic states composed of four or five quarks and antiquarks. The exact nature of their internal structure remains uncertain. This paper reports the first measurement of quantum numbers of the recently discovered family of three all-charm tetraquarks, using data collected by the CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider from 2016 to 2018. The angular analysis techniques developed for the discovery and characterization of the Higgs boson have been applied to the new exotic states. The quantum numbers for parity $P$ and charge conjugation $C$ symmetries are found to be +1. The spin $J$ of these exotic states is consistent with 2$\hbar$, while 0$\hbar$ and 1$\hbar$ are excluded at 95% and 99% confidence level, respectively. The $J^{PC}=2^{++}$ assignment implies particular configurations of constituent spins and orbital angular momenta, which constrain the possible internal structure of these tetraquarks.
Summary of statistical tests.
Results from hypothesis test for pairs of spin-parity models.
The $\mathrm{J}/\psi\mathrm{J}/\psi$ invariant mass distribution in data.
Distributions of discriminant for the $2_{m}^{+}$ and $0^{-}$ models.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance on the query string syntax can also be found in the OpenSearch documentation.
We support searching for a range of records using their HEPData record ID or Inspire ID.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.