$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (20-30% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (30-40% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (40-50% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (50-60% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (60-70% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (70-80% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (80-90% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$v_2\{EP\}$ with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (90-100% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for unbiased events in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (0-10% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (10-20% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (20-30% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (30-40% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (40-50% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (50-60% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (60-70% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (70-80% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (80-90% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (90-100% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for unbiased events in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (0-10% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (10-20% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (20-30% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (30-40% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (40-50% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (50-60% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (60-70% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (70-80% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (80-90% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality for shape selected events (90-100% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for unbiased events in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (0-10% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (10-20% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (20-30% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (30-40% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (40-50% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (50-60% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (60-70% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (70-80% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (80-90% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (opposite charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (90-100% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for unbiased events in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (0-10% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (10-20% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (20-30% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (30-40% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (40-50% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (50-60% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (60-70% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (70-80% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (80-90% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} - \varphi_{\beta}) \rangle$ (same charge pairs) as a function of centrality for shape selected events (90-100% $q_2$) in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 0-5% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 5-10% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 10-20% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 20-30% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 30-40% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 40-50% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 50-60% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 0-5% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 5-10% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 10-20% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 20-30% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 30-40% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 40-50% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ multiplied by the charged-particle density, $dN/d\eta$, as a function of $v_2\{EP\}$ for centrality class 50-60% in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

$p_1$ parameter from a linear fit to $\langle \cos(\varphi_{\alpha} + \varphi_{\beta} - 2\Psi_{2}) \rangle$ (opposite - same) with $|\Delta\eta| > 2.0$ as a function of centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

CME fraction extracted from the slope parameter of fits to data and MC—Glauber model as a function of centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

CME fraction extracted from the slope parameter of fits to data and MC—KLN CGC model as a function of centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

CME fraction extracted from the slope parameter of fits to data and EKRT model as a function of centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76$ TeV.

Transverse momentum dependence of inclusive J/$\psi$ $v_2$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02$ TeV for the 40-60% centrality class (forward rapidity). The first uncertainty (stat) is statistical, the second (sys,uncorrel) is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one (sys,correl) is a $p_{\rm T}$-correlated systematic uncertainty.

Profile likelihood test statistic $-2\Delta log L$ scan in data as a function of the Higgs and Z bosons signal strengths $(\mu_{H}, \mu_{Z})$.

68% CL contour as a function of the Higgs and Z bosons signal strengths $(\mu_{H}, \mu_{Z})$.

95\% CL contour as a function of the Higgs and Z bosons signal strengths $(\mu_{H}, \mu_{Z})$.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction, $\sigma_{\mathrm{VBF}}(H^{\pm\pm}) \times \mathrm{{\it B}}(H^{\pm\pm} \to W^{\pm}W^{\pm})$, as a function of doubly charged Higgs boson mass.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on $s_H$ in the Georgi--Machacek model as a function of doubly charged Higgs boson mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL limits on the coefficients for higher-order (dimension-eight) operators in the effective field theory Lagrangian.

Main systematic uncertainties in the analysis.

Signal efficiency from the generator level fiducial definition to the reconstruction level selection for the dilepton mass variable.

$v_2^{J/\psi}${2,sub} in bins of $p_T^{J/\psi}$ for p-Pb collisions in Pb-going direction at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV. The quoted global systematic uncertainties correspond to the combined statistical and systematic uncertainties of the measured $v_2^{tracklet}$ coefficient. The results are obtained by subtracting associated per-trigger yields in low-multiplicity (40-100% V0M) collisions from the yields in high-multiplicity (0-20% V0M) collisions.

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

mass distribution

The statistical error per bin of Dalitz plot, for 3-hadron chains with mass below 0.59 GeV. Coordinates X = sqrt(3)(T0-T2)/sum(T) , Y = 3T1/sum(T) - 1. T0/T1/T2 stand for kinetic energy of hadrons in the rest frame of the triplet ( hadrons 0 and 2 form like-sign pair).

The bin-uncorrelated systematic error per bin of Dalitz plot, for 3-hadron chains with mass below 0.59 GeV. Coordinates X = sqrt(3)(T0-T2)/sum(T) , Y = 3T1/sum(T) - 1. T0/T1/T2 stand for kinetic energy of hadrons in the rest frame of the triplet ( hadrons 0 and 2 form like-sign pair).

The bin-correlated systematic error per bin of Dalitz plot, for 3-hadron chains with mass below 0.59 GeV. Coordinates X = sqrt(3)(T0-T2)/sum(T) , Y = 3T1/sum(T) - 1. T0/T1/T2 stand for kinetic energy of hadrons in the rest frame of the triplet ( hadrons 0 and 2 form like-sign pair).

Observed and predicted mTtot distribution in the b-tag category of the 2tau_h channel. Despite listing this as an exclusive final state (as there must be at least one b-jets), there is no explicit selection on the presence of additional light-flavour jets. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table. The last bin includes overflows. The combined prediction for A and H bosons with masses of 300, 500 and 800 GeV and $\tan\beta$ = 10 in the hMSSM scenario are also provided.

Observed and predicted mTtot distribution for the b-inclusive selection in the 1l1tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table. In the paper, the first bin is cut off at 60 GeV for aesthetics but contains underflows down to 50 GeV as in the HepData table. The last bin includes overflows. The prediction for a SSM Zprime with masses of 1500, 2000 and 2500 GeV are also provided.

Observed and predicted mTtot distribution for the b-inclusive selection in the 2tau_h channel. Please note that the bin content is divided by the bin width in the paper figure, but not in the HepData table. The last bin includes overflows. The prediction for a SSM Zprime with masses of 1500, 2000 and 2500 GeV are also provided.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the b-associated Higgs boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the boson mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the Drell Yan production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the Zprime boson mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the Higgs boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the boson mass and the relative strength of the b-associated production.

Ratio of the 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section times branching fraction for alternate Zprime models with respect to the SSM, both observed and expected are shown.

Acceptance, acceptance times efficiency and b-tag category fraction for a scalar boson produced by gluon-gluon fusion as a function of the scalar boson mass.

Acceptance, acceptance times efficiency and b-tag category fraction for a scalar boson produced by b-associated production as a function of the scalar boson mass.

Acceptance and acceptance times efficiency for a heavy gauge boson produced by Drell Yan as a function of the gauge boson mass.

Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times braching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the Higgs boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. Vaules are provided for the fit to the observed data and to the expected data, which is the sum of Standard Model contributions not including the SM Higgs boson. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively.

Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times braching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the Higgs boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. Vaules are provided for the fit to the observed data and to the expected data, which is the sum of Standard Model contributions not including the SM Higgs boson. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively.

Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times braching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the Higgs boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. Vaules are provided for the fit to the observed data and to the expected data, which is the sum of Standard Model contributions not including the SM Higgs boson. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively.

Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times braching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the Higgs boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. Vaules are provided for the fit to the observed data and to the expected data, which is the sum of Standard Model contributions not including the SM Higgs boson. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively.

Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times braching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the Higgs boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. Vaules are provided for the fit to the observed data and to the expected data, which is the sum of Standard Model contributions not including the SM Higgs boson. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively.

Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times braching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the Higgs boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. Vaules are provided for the fit to the observed data and to the expected data, which is the sum of Standard Model contributions not including the SM Higgs boson. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively.

Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times braching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the Higgs boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. Vaules are provided for the fit to the observed data and to the expected data, which is the sum of Standard Model contributions not including the SM Higgs boson. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively.

Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times braching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the Higgs boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. Vaules are provided for the fit to the observed data and to the expected data, which is the sum of Standard Model contributions not including the SM Higgs boson. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively.

Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times braching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the Higgs boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. Vaules are provided for the fit to the observed data and to the expected data, which is the sum of Standard Model contributions not including the SM Higgs boson. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively.

Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times braching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the Higgs boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. Vaules are provided for the fit to the observed data and to the expected data, which is the sum of Standard Model contributions not including the SM Higgs boson. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively.

Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times braching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the Higgs boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. Vaules are provided for the fit to the observed data and to the expected data, which is the sum of Standard Model contributions not including the SM Higgs boson. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively.

Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times braching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the Higgs boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. Vaules are provided for the fit to the observed data and to the expected data, which is the sum of Standard Model contributions not including the SM Higgs boson. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively.

Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times braching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the Higgs boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. Vaules are provided for the fit to the observed data and to the expected data, which is the sum of Standard Model contributions not including the SM Higgs boson. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively.

Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times braching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the Higgs boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. Vaules are provided for the fit to the observed data and to the expected data, which is the sum of Standard Model contributions not including the SM Higgs boson. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively.

Two dimensional likelihood scan of the gluon-gluon fusion cross section times braching fraction, $\sigma(gg\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$, vs the b-associated production times branching fraction, $\sigma(bb\phi)\times B(\phi\to\tau\tau)$ for the Higgs boson mass ($m_\phi$) indicated in the table. For each mass, 10000 points are scanned. At each point $\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ is calculated, defined as the negative-log-likelihood (NLL) of the conditional fit with $\sigma(gg\phi)$ and $\sigma(bb\phi)$ fixed to their values at the point and with the minimum NLL value at any point subtracted. Vaules are provided for the fit to the observed data and to the expected data, which is the sum of Standard Model contributions not including the SM Higgs boson. The best-fit point and the preferred 68% and 95% boundaries are found at $2\Delta(\mathrm{NLL})$ values of 0.0, 2.30 and 5.90, respectively.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the gluon-gluon fusion Higgs boson production cross section times ditau branching fraction as a function of the boson mass.

Invariant mass distributions of the $t\to jj^{'}b$ candidates, $m_{top}$, in the 0 b category after all selections. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties.

Invariant mass distributions of the $t\to jj^{'}b$ candidates, $m_{top}$, in the 1 b category after all selections. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties.

Invariant mass distributions of the $t\to jj^{'}b$ candidates, $m_{top}$, in the $\geq$2 b category after all selections. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties.

The measured cross section in the $\mu$+jets, $\rm{e}$+jets and $\ell$+jets channels. The first uncertainty is the statistical, the second is the systematic.

Observed data events as function of the transverse momentum of the four-lepton system.

Response matrix for the transverse momentum of the four-lepton system.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the four-lepton system., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the four-lepton system., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the transverse momentum of the leading Z candidate. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the transverse momentum of the leading Z candidate.

Observed data events as function of the transverse momentum of the leading Z candidate.

Response matrix for the transverse momentum of the leading Z candidate.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the leading Z candidate., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the leading Z candidate., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the transverse momentum of the subleading Z candidate. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the transverse momentum of the subleading Z candidate.

Observed data events as function of the transverse momentum of the subleading Z candidate.

Response matrix for the transverse momentum of the subleading Z candidate.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the subleading Z candidate., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the subleading Z candidate., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the transverse momentum of the 1. lepton. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the transverse momentum of the 1. lepton.

Observed data events as function of the transverse momentum of the 1. lepton.

Response matrix for the transverse momentum of the 1. lepton.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the 1. lepton., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the 1. lepton., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the transverse momentum of the 2. lepton. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the transverse momentum of the 2. lepton.

Observed data events as function of the transverse momentum of the 2. lepton.

Response matrix for the transverse momentum of the 2. lepton.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the 2. lepton., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the 2. lepton., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the transverse momentum of the 3. lepton. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the transverse momentum of the 3. lepton.

Observed data events as function of the transverse momentum of the 3. lepton.

Response matrix for the transverse momentum of the 3. lepton.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the 3. lepton., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the 3. lepton., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the transverse momentum of the 4. lepton. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the transverse momentum of the 4. lepton.

Observed data events as function of the transverse momentum of the 4. lepton.

Response matrix for the transverse momentum of the 4. lepton.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the 4. lepton., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the 4. lepton., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the absolute rapidity of the four-lepton system. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the absolute rapidity of the four-lepton system.

Observed data events as function of the absolute rapidity of the four-lepton system.

Response matrix for the absolute rapidity of the four-lepton system.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the absolute rapidity of the four-lepton system., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the absolute rapidity of the four-lepton system., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the Rapidity separation of the Z candidates. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the Rapidity separation of the Z candidates.

Observed data events as function of the Rapidity separation of the Z candidates.

Response matrix for the Rapidity separation of the Z candidates.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the Rapidity separation of the Z candidates., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the Rapidity separation of the Z candidates., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the azimuthal-angle separation of the Z candidates. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the azimuthal-angle separation of the Z candidates.

Observed data events as function of the azimuthal-angle separation of the Z candidates.

Response matrix for the azimuthal-angle separation of the Z candidates.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the azimuthal-angle separation of the Z candidates., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the azimuthal-angle separation of the Z candidates., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the jet multiplicity. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the jet multiplicity.

Observed data events as function of the jet multiplicity.

Response matrix for the jet multiplicity.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the jet multiplicity., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the jet multiplicity., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the central-jet multiplicity. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the central-jet multiplicity.

Observed data events as function of the central-jet multiplicity.

Response matrix for the central-jet multiplicity.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the central-jet multiplicity., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the central-jet multiplicity., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the multiplicity of jets with pT > 60 GeV. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the multiplicity of jets with pT > 60 GeV.

Observed data events as function of the multiplicity of jets with pT > 60 GeV.

Response matrix for the multiplicity of jets with pT > 60 GeV.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the multiplicity of jets with pT > 60 GeV., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the multiplicity of jets with pT > 60 GeV., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the mass of dijet formed of the two leading jets. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the mass of dijet formed of the two leading jets.

Observed data events as function of the mass of dijet formed of the two leading jets.

Response matrix for the mass of dijet formed of the two leading jets.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the mass of dijet formed of the two leading jets., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the mass of dijet formed of the two leading jets., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the rapidity separation of the two leading jets. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the rapidity separation of the two leading jets.

Observed data events as function of the rapidity separation of the two leading jets.

Response matrix for the rapidity separation of the two leading jets.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the rapidity separation of the two leading jets., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the rapidity separation of the two leading jets., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the scalar transverse-momentum sum of jets. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the scalar transverse-momentum sum of jets.

Observed data events as function of the scalar transverse-momentum sum of jets.

Response matrix for the scalar transverse-momentum sum of jets.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the scalar transverse-momentum sum of jets., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the scalar transverse-momentum sum of jets., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the absolute pseudorapitidy of the 1. jet. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the absolute pseudorapitidy of the 1. jet.

Observed data events as function of the absolute pseudorapitidy of the 1. jet.

Response matrix for the absolute pseudorapitidy of the 1. jet.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the absolute pseudorapitidy of the 1. jet., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the absolute pseudorapitidy of the 1. jet., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the absolute pseudorapitidy of the 2. jet.

Predicted background as function of the absolute pseudorapitidy of the 2. jet.

Observed data events as function of the absolute pseudorapitidy of the 2. jet.

Response matrix for the absolute pseudorapitidy of the 2. jet.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the absolute pseudorapitidy of the 2. jet., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the absolute pseudorapitidy of the 2. jet., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the transverse momentum of the 1. jet. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the transverse momentum of the 1. jet.

Observed data events as function of the transverse momentum of the 1. jet.

Response matrix for the transverse momentum of the 1. jet.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the 1. jet., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the 1. jet., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Differential fiducial cross section as function of the transverse momentum of the 2. jet. Fiducial phase space - At least 4 electrons, 4 muons, or 2 electrons and 2 muons forming two same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons (Z candidates) - Lepton pairing ambiguities are resolved by choosing the combination that results in the smaller value of the sum of |mll - mZ| for the two pairs, where mll is the mass of the dilepton system and mZ the Z boson pole mass - Lepton absolute pseudorapidity |eta| < 2.7 - Lepton transverse momentum pT > 5 GeV - The three leading-pT leptons satisfy pT > 20 GeV, 15 GeV, 10 GeV - Angular separation of any same-flavour (opposite-flavour) leptons DeltaR > 0.1 (0.2) - Both chosen dileptons have invariant mass between 66 GeV and 116 GeV - All possible same-flavour opposite-charge dileptons have mass > 5 GeV Details about the fiducial definition as well as all other aspects of the analysis can be found in the journal publication.

Predicted background as function of the transverse momentum of the 2. jet.

Observed data events as function of the transverse momentum of the 2. jet.

Response matrix for the transverse momentum of the 2. jet.

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the 2. jet., considering only correlations of the statistical uncertainty of the data. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section

Correlation matrix of cross section uncertainties for the transverse momentum of the 2. jet., considering correlations of both the statistical uncertainty of the data and systematic uncertainties entering via background subtraction and unfolding. The correlations are given between bins of the unfolded cross section