The invariant mass distribution of $B^+$ candidates is shown for $14 < p_{T} < 15$ GeV along with the corresponding fit.

The invariant mass distribution of $B^0$ candidates is shown for $15 < p_{T} < 16$ GeV along with the corresponding fit.

The invariant mass distribution of $B^0_{s}$ candidates is shown for $16 < p_{T} < 18$ GeV along with the corresponding fit.

The invariant mass distribution of $B^+$ candidates is shown for $13 < p_{T} < 18$ GeV along with the corresponding fit.

The invariant mass distribution of $B^0$ candidates is shown for $18 < p_{T} < 23$ GeV along with the corresponding fit.

The invariant mass distribution of $B^0_{s}$ candidates is shown for $23 < p_{T} < 28$ GeV along with the corresponding fit.

Measured $f_s/f_d$ as a function of $p_T$ using open-charm channels. Uncertainties include statistical and uncorrelated systematic components.

Measured $f_s/f_d$ as a function of $|y|$ using open-charm channels. Uncertainties include statistical and uncorrelated systematic components.

Measured $f_s/f_u$ as a function of $p_T$ using open-charm channels. Uncertainties include statistical and uncorrelated systematic components.

Measured $f_s/f_u$ as a function of $|y|$ using open-charm channels. Uncertainties include statistical and uncorrelated systematic components.

Measured $\mathcal{R}_{s}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ using charmonium channels, performed on the tag-side. The error bars include both statistical and bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Measured $\mathcal{R}_{s}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ using charmonium channels, performed on the probe-side. The error bars include both statistical and bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Measured $\mathcal{R}_{s}$ as a function of $|y|$ using charmonium channels, performed on the tag-side. The error bars include both statistical and bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Measured $\mathcal{R}_{s}$ as a function of $|y|$ using charmonium channels, performed on the probe-side. The error bars include both statistical and bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Measured $\mathcal{R}_{s}^{d}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ using charmonium channels, performed on the tag-side. The error bars include both statistical and bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Measured $\mathcal{R}_{s}^{d}$ as a function of $|y|$ using charmonium channels, performed on the tag-side. The error bars include both statistical and bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Measured $\mathcal{R}_{s}^{d}$ as a function of $|y|$ using charmonium channels, performed on the tag-side. The error bars include both statistical and bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Measured $\mathcal{R}_{s}^{d}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ using charmonium channels, performed on the probe-side. The error bars include both statistical and bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.

Measured $f_{d}/f_{u}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ using open-charm channels. The error bars include statistical and bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainties. The global uncertainty on $f_{d}/f_{u}$ is 5.7$\%$ for the open-charm channel.

Measured $f_{d}/f_{u}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ using charmonium channels, performed on the tag-side. The error bars include statistical and bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainties. The global uncertainty on $f_{d}/f_{u}$ is 4.8$\%$ for the charmonium channels for both the tag and probe sides.

Measured $f_{d}/f_{u}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ using charmonium channels, performed on the probe-side. The error bars include statistical and bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainties. The global uncertainty on $f_{d}/f_{u}$ is 4.8$\%$ for the charmonium channels for both the tag and probe sides.

Measured $f_{d}/f_{u}$ as a function of $|y|$ using open-charm channels. The error bars include statistical and bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainties. The global uncertainty on $f_{d}/f_{u}$ is 5.7$\%$ for the open-charm channel.

Measured $f_{d}/f_{u}$ as a function of $|y|$ using charmonium channels, performed on the tag-side. The error bars include statistical and bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainties. The global uncertainty on $f_{d}/f_{u}$ is 4.8$\%$ for the charmonium channels for both the tag and probe sides.

Measured $f_{d}/f_{u}$ as a function of $|y|$ using charmonium channels, performed on the probe-side. The error bars include statistical and bin-to-bin uncorrelated systematic uncertainties.The global uncertainty on $f_{d}/f_{u}$ is 4.8$\%$ for the charmonium channels for both the tag and probe sides.

Measured $f_s/f_d$ as a function of $p_T$ using open-charm channels. Uncertainties include statistical and uncorrelated systematic components. The global uncertainties amount to 6.3$\%$ on $f_s/f_d$ for the open-charm channel

The $\mathcal{R}_{s}^{d}$ values from tag-side charmonium channels are converted to $f_s/f_d$ using the absolute normalization $c_{sd} = 1.64$. Uncertainties include statistical and uncorrelated systematic components. The global uncertainties amount to 8.4$\%$ on $f_s/f_d$ for both the charmonium channel.

Measured $f_s/f_u$ as a function of $p_T$ using open-charm channels. Uncertainties include statistical and uncorrelated systematic components. The global uncertainties amount to 7.4$\%$ on $f_s/f_d$ for the open-charm channel

The $\mathcal{R}_{s}$ values from tag-side charmonium channels are converted to $f_s/f_u$ using the absolute normalization $c_{su} = 2.02$. Uncertainties include statistical and uncorrelated systematic components. The global uncertainties amount to 8.7$\%$ on $f_s/f_d$ for both the charmonium channel.

The $\mathcal{R}_{s}$ values from the previous CMS measurement (PRL 131 (2023) 121901) are converted to $f_s/f_u$ using the absolute normalization $c_{su} = 2.02$. Uncertainties include statistical and uncorrelated systematic components. The global uncertainties amount to 8.7$\%$ on $f_s/f_d$ for both the previous CMS result.

$K^{0}_{S} K^{0}_{S}$ correlation meassurement in $10-20\%$ centrality.

$K^{0}_{S} K^{0}_{S}$ correlation meassurement in $20-30\%$ centrality.

$K^{0}_{S} K^{0}_{S}$ correlation meassurement in $30-40\%$ centrality.

$K^{0}_{S} K^{0}_{S}$ correlation meassurement in $40-50\%$ centrality.

$K^{0}_{S} K^{0}_{S}$ correlation meassurement in $50-60\%$ centrality.

$\Lambda K^{0}_{S} \oplus \overline{\Lambda} K^{0}_{S}$ correlation meassurement in $0-80\%$ centrality.

$\Lambda\Lambda\oplus\overline{\Lambda}\overline{\Lambda}$ correlation meassurement in $0-80\%$ centrality.

The extracted $R_{inv}$ from $K^{0}_{S} K^{0}_{S}$ correlations as a function of centrality.

The extracted $\lambda$ parameters from $K^{0}_{S} K^{0}_{S}$ correlations as a function of centrality.

Extracted effective range ($d_{0}$) and real components of the complex scattering length ($\Re f_{0}$) from the $\Lambda\Lambda\oplus\overline{\Lambda}\overline{\Lambda}$ and $\Lambda K^{0}_{S} \oplus \overline{\Lambda} K^{0}_{S}$ correlations.

Extracted imaginary components of the complex scattering length ($\Im f_{0}$) and real components of the complex scattering length ($\Re f_{0}$) from the $\Lambda K^{0}_{S} \oplus \overline{\Lambda} K^{0}_{S}$ correlation.

The expected upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 4\gamma$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$. Additionally, the expected limits are not provided for a small number of points, indicated with a hyphen, because of a technical failure with the computation.

The observed upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 6\pi^0$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow 3\pi^0)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$.

The expected upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 6\pi^0$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow 3\pi^0)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$. Additionally, the expected limits are not provided for a small number of points, indicated with a hyphen, because of a technical failure with the computation.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the visible cross section as a function of $m_X$ and the fraction of events in the low-$\Delta E$ category.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Selection efficiency for photons originating from the BSM process $X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, where the $X$ particle is a high-mass narrow-width scalar particle originating from the gluon--gluon fusion process.

Fraction of photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for photons originating from the BSM process $X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, where the $X$ particle is a high-mass narrow-width scalar particle originating from the gluon--gluon fusion process.

$v_2(p_T)$ of $\Xi^{-} + \Xi^{+}$ and $\Omega^{-} + \Omega^{+}$ from 200 GeV Au+Au minimum bias collisions.

Number of quark ($n_q$) scaled $v_2$ as a function of scaled $p_T$ for $\Xi^{-} + \Xi^{+}$ and $\Omega^{-} + \Omega^{+}$ from 200 GeV Au+Au minimum bias collisions.