Measured charge asymmetry, $A_c$, values for the electron and muon channels combined after unfolding as a function of the $t\bar{t}$ transverse momentum, $p_{{\rm T}, t\bar{t}}$. The quoted uncertainties include statistical and systematic components after the marginalisation.

Correlation coefficients $\rho_{i,j}$ for the statistical and systematic uncertainties between the $i$-th and $j$-th bin of the differential $A_c$ measurement as a function of the $t\bar{t}$ invariant mass, $m_{t\bar{t}}$.

Correlation coefficients $\rho_{i,j}$ for the statistical and systematic uncertainties between the $i$-th and $j$-th bin of the differential $A_c$ measurement as a function of the $t\bar{t}$ velocity along the z-axis, $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$.

Correlation coefficients $\rho_{i,j}$ for the statistical and systematic uncertainties between the $i$-th and $j$-th bin of the differential $A_c$ measurement as a function of the transverse momentum, $p_{{\rm T}, t\bar{t}}$.

Ratio of the fiducial cross section for $t\bar{t}$ events with two leptons and at least four b-jets to the fiducial cross section for $t\bar{t}$ events with two leptons and at least four jets, at least two of which must be b-jets. The definition of the cross-sections includes $t\bar{t}+Z / H$ events that pass the fiducial requirements.

Measured fiducial cross section for $t\bar{t}$ events with exactly one lepton and at least five jets, of which at least three are b-jets. The definition of the cross-section excludes $t\bar{t}+Z / H$ events that pass the fiducial requirements.

Measured fiducial cross section for $t\bar{t}$ events with two leptons and at least three b-jets. The definition of the cross-section excludes $t\bar{t}+Z / H$ events that pass the fiducial requirements.

Measured fiducial cross section for $t\bar{t}$ events with two leptons and at least four b-jets. The definition of the cross-section excludes $t\bar{t}+Z / H$ events that pass the fiducial requirements.

Ratio of the fiducial cross section for $t\bar{t}$ events with two leptons and at least four b-jets to the fiducial cross section for $t\bar{t}$ events with two leptons and at least four jets, at least two of which must be b-jets. The definition of the cross-sections excludes $t\bar{t}+Z / H$ events that pass the fiducial requirements.

Ratios of $dN_{ch}/d\eta$ distributions measured in different centrality intervals to that in the peripheral (60–90%) centrality interval. The first uncertainty is statistical the second systematic.

Charged-particle pseudorapidity distribution $dN_{ch}/d\eta$ as a function of centrality (related to the $\langle N_{\mathrm{part}} \rangle$ by Table 3) for several $\eta$-regions. The first uncertainty is statistical the second is the systematic uncertianty without centrality determination uncertainty, the third is the centrality determination systematic uncertainty. The centrality determination systematic uncertainty shall not be used in ratios to any quantity determined in the same centrality interval, e.g. for $dN_{ch}/d\eta/(0.5 N_{\mathrm{part}})$ or in ratios of other particle yields. This uncertainty shall be used for comparing to results of other experiments.

Femtoscopic radii as a function od pair transverse momentum $k_{\rm T}$ for seven centrality ranges.

One-dimensional femtoscopic radius $R_{\mathrm inv}$ as a function od pair transverse momentum $k_{\rm T}$ for seven centrality ranges.

The differential cross section of $Z$ boson production scaled by 1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, (1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$) $d\sigma /dp_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, for $-3<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<2$.

The differential cross section of $Z$ boson production scaled by 1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, (1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$) $d\sigma /dp_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, for $-2<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<0$ and $0<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<2.

Centrality bias corrected $Z$ boson yields per event for $-3<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<2$ scaled by by $\langle N_{coll}\rangle$. (To remove the centrality bias correction each value may be multiplied by the approriate correction value found in arXiv:1412.0976.).

The rapidity differential Z boson yields per event scaled by $\langle N_{coll}\rangle$ for three centrality ranges.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$.

Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$.

Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$.

Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 5-10%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 5-10%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 5-10%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 5-10%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 30-40%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 30-40%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 30-40%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 30-40%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 50-60%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 50-60%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 50-60%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Acceptance times efficiency for the tight channel of the Razor analysis for the direct squark-squark model.

Acceptance for the 1tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the gluino simplified model.

Efficiency for the 1tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the gluino simplified model.

Acceptance for the 2tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the gluino simplified model.

Efficiency for the 2tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the gluino simplified model.

Acceptance for the 1tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the squark simplified model.

Efficiency for the 1tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the squark simplified model.

Acceptance for the 2tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the squark simplified model.

Efficiency for the 2tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the squark simplified model.

Observed limit on the cross-section times branching ratio in fb at 95% CL for the direct squark-squark model.

Observed limit on the cross-section times branching ratio in fb at 95% CL for the gluino simplified model, obtained by the Taus+jets+MET analysis.

Observed limit on the cross-section times branching ratio in fb at 95% CL for the squark simplified model, obtained by the Taus+jets+MET analysis.

Observed 95% CL cross section times branching ratio upper limit on pMSSM qLqL production with M1=60 GeV and $m_{\tilde g}=$1.6 TeV interpreted by the 0L analysis including its two dedicated signal regions.

Observed 95% CL cross section times branching ratio upper limit on pMSSM qLqL production with M2=(M1+mqL)/2 and $m_{\tilde g}=$1.6 TeV interpreted by the 0L analysis including its two dedicated signal regions.

Observed 95% CL cross section times branching ratio upper limit on pMSSM qLqL production with M1=60 GeV with $m_{\tilde g}=$2.2 TeV interpreted by the 0L analysis including its two dedicated signal regions.

Observed 95% CL cross section times branching ratio upper limit on pMSSM qLqL production with M2=(M1+mqL)/2 and $m_{\tilde g}=$2.2 TeV interpreted by the 0L analysis including its two dedicated signal regions.

Observed 95% CL cross section times branching ratio upper limit on pMSSM qLqL production with M1=60 GeV and $m_{\tilde g}=$3.0 TeV interpreted by the 0L analysis including its two dedicated signal regions.

Observed 95% CL cross section times branching ratio upper limit on pMSSM qLqL production with M2=(M1+mqL)/2 and $m_{\tilde g}=$3.0 TeV interpreted by the 0L analysis including its two dedicated signal regions.

Observed and expected limits on the cross-section times branching ratio in fb at 95% CL for the gluino-mediated stop model with off-shell stops, for mass points with four- or five-body gluino decays, obtained by the SS/3L and 0/1L3B analyses.

: Cut flow for signal regions 0L_4jt+ and 0L_5jt of baseline signal points normalized to 20.3 fb$^\mathrm{-1}$. The point used for the 0L_4jt+ cutflow is mqL = 1150 GeV, M1 = 60 GeV, M2 = 1000 GeV, m(gluino) = 2200 GeV. The point used for the 0L_5jt cutflow is mqL = 950 GeV, M1 = 100 GeV, M2 = 525 GeV, m(gluino) = 2200 GeV.

Cut flow for the 1L(H)_7-jet SR (electron channel) for the main background from the $t\bar{t}$ production. The events are normalized to 20.3 fb$^\mathrm{-1}$.

Cut flow for the 1L(H)_7-jet SR (muon channel) for the main background from the $t\bar{t}$ production. The events are normalized to 20.3 fb$^\mathrm{-1}$.

Cut flow for 1L(H)_7-jet SR (electron channel). The signal point is taken from the gluino simplified model with 1-step decay via charginos and parameters $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1145 GeV, $m_{{\tilde \chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 785 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 425 GeV; 20000 events were generated for this point. The events are normalized to 20.3 fb$^\mathrm{-1}$.

Cut flow for 1L(H)_7-jet SR (muon channel). The signal point is taken from the gluino simplified model with 1-step decay via charginos and parameters $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1145 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 785 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 425 GeV; 20000 events were generated for this point. The events are normalized to 20.3 fb$^\mathrm{-1}$.

Cut flow for 1L(H)_7-jet SR (electron channel). The signal point is taken from the gluino simplified model with 1-step decay via charginos and parameters $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1025 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 545 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 65 GeV; 20000 events were generated for this point. The events are normalized to 20.3 fb$^\mathrm{-1}$.

Cut flow for 1L(H)_7-jet SR (muon channel). The signal point is taken from the gluino simplified model with 1-step decay via charginos and parameters $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1025 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 545 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 65 GeV; 20000 events were generated for this point. The events are normalized to 20.3 fb$^\mathrm{-1}$.

Cut flow for 0LRaz_SR$_{\rm loose}$ and 0LRaz_SR$_{\rm tight}$ signal regions of baseline signal point ($m(\tilde{q}, \tilde{\chi}_1^0)=(850, 100)$ GeV) normalized to 20.3 fb$^{-1}$. 5000 events were generated for ths point.