Tuned intrinsic kT parameters ShowerHandler:IntrinsicPtGaussian in Herwig with the underlying-event tune CH2 at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy from 38.8 GeV to 13 TeV.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters ShowerHandler:IntrinsicPtGaussian in Herwig with the underlying-event tune CH3 at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy from 38.8 GeV to 13 TeV.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters BeamRemnants:PrimordialkThard in Pythia with the underlying-event tune CP5 and ISR starting scale SpaceShower:pT0Ref = 1 GeV at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy from 38.8 GeV to 13 TeV.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters ShowerHandler:IntrinsicPtGaussian in Herwig with the underlying-event tune CH3 and ISR starting scale SudakovCommon:pTmin=0.7 GeV at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy from 38.8 GeV to 13 TeV.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters BeamRemnants:PrimordialkThard in Pythia with the underlying-event tune CP5 at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 38.8 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters BeamRemnants:PrimordialkThard in Pythia with the underlying-event tune CP5 at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 8000 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters BeamRemnants:PrimordialkThard in Pythia with the underlying-event tune CP5 at proton-nucleon center-of-mass energy 8160 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters BeamRemnants:PrimordialkThard in Pythia with the underlying-event tune CP5 at proton-nucleon center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters ShowerHandler:IntrinsicPtGaussian in Herwig with the underlying-event tune CH2 at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 38.8 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters ShowerHandler:IntrinsicPtGaussian in Herwig with the underlying-event tune CH2 at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 8000 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters ShowerHandler:IntrinsicPtGaussian in Herwig with the underlying-event tune CH2 at proton-nucleon center-of-mass energy 8160 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Tuned intrinsic kT parameters ShowerHandler:IntrinsicPtGaussian in Herwig with the underlying-event tune CH2 at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV versus the dilepton mass range of the process.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 38.8 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 62 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 200 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-anti-proton center-of-mass energy 1800 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-anti-proton center-of-mass energy 1960 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 2760 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 8000 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-nucleon center-of-mass energy 8160 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV when fitting to the CMS measurement.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters among various generator settings at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV when fitting to the LHCb measurement.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 38.8 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 62 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 200 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-anti-proton center-of-mass energy 1800 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-anti-proton center-of-mass energy 1960 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 2760 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 8000 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-nucleon center-of-mass energy 8160 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV when fitting to the CMS measurement.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Pythia at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV when fitting to the LHCb measurement.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 38.8 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 62 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 200 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-anti-proton center-of-mass energy 1800 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-anti-proton center-of-mass energy 1960 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 2760 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 8000 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-nucleon center-of-mass energy 8160 GeV.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV when fitting to the CMS measurement.

Covariance of the data uncertainty contribution to the tuned intrinsic kT parameters between the two generator settings of Herwig at proton-proton center-of-mass energy 13000 GeV when fitting to the LHCb measurement.

Distributions of $m_T$ in the $W^{+}$ signal selection for mu final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to\tau\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_T$ in the $W^{-}$ signal selection for e final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 5TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to\tau\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_T$ in the $W^{-}$ signal selection for mu final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 5TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to\tau\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_T$ in the $W^{-}$ signal selection for e final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to\tau\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_T$ in the $W^{-}$ signal selection for mu final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to\tau\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_{ll}$ in the Z signal selection for ee final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 5TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to l\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_{ll}$ in the Z signal selection for mumu final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 5TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to l\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_{ll}$ in the Z signal selection for ee final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to l\nu$, and diboson processes.

Distributions of $m_{ll}$ in the Z signal selection for mumu final states for the pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13TeV after the maximum likelihood fit. The EW backgrounds include the contributions from DY, $W\to l\nu$, and diboson processes.

Figure 4 Fiducial cross sections and ratios for $W\to\ell\nu$ and $Z\to\ell\ell$ processes at 13TeV

Figure 5 Fiducial cross sections and ratios for $W\to\ell\nu$ and $Z\to\ell\ell$ processes at 5.02TeV

Figure 6 Fiducial cross sections and ratios for $W\to\ell\nu$ and $Z\to\ell\ell$ processes between 13TeV and 5.02TeV

Figure 7 Total cross sections and ratios for $W\to\ell\nu$ and $Z\to\ell\ell$ processes at 13TeV

Figure 8 Total cross sections and ratios for $W\to\ell\nu$ and $Z\to\ell\ell$ processes at 5.02TeV

Figure 9 Total cross sections and ratios for $W\to\ell\nu$ and $Z\to\ell\ell$ processes between 13TeV and 5.02TeV

Summary of theoretical predictions of the total inclusive cross sections for W and Z boson production times leptonic branching fractions at ppbar collisions.

Summary of experimental measurements of the total inclusive cross sections for W and Z boson production times leptonic branching fractions at UA1 and UA2.

Summary of experimental measurements of the total inclusive cross sections for W and Z boson production times leptonic branching fractions at D0.

Summary of experimental measurements of the total inclusive cross sections for W and Z boson production times leptonic branching fractions at CDF.

Summary of theoretical predictions of the total inclusive cross sections for W boson production times leptonic branching fractions at pp collisions.

Summary of experimental measurements of the total inclusive cross sections for Z boson production times leptonic branching fractions at pp collisions.

Summary of experimental measurements of the total inclusive cross sections for W and Z boson production times leptonic branching fractions at CMS.

HFE (electrons from semileptonic decays of heavy-flavor hadrons) invariant yields in different centrality intervals of Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=200$ GeV. The vertical bars and the boxes represent statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. The horizontal bars indicate the bin width.

HFE (electrons from semileptonic decays of heavy-flavor hadrons) $R_{\rm AA}$ (red circles) as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ in different centrality intervals of Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=200$ GeV, compared with STAR (yellow stars) and PHENIX (green squares) published results, and Duke ((modified Langevin transport model, blue line) and PHSD (parton-hadron-string dynamics model, orange line) model calculations. Vertical bars and boxes around data points represent combined statistical and systematic uncertainties from both Au+Au and $p$+$p$ measurements, respectively. Boxes at unity show the global uncertainties, which for this analysis include the 8% global uncertainty on $p$+$p$ reference and the $N_{\rm coll}$ uncertainties. The left box is for PHENIX and the right one for STAR.

HFE (electrons from semileptonic decays of heavy-flavor hadrons) $R_{\rm AA}$ (red circles) as a function of $N_{\rm part}$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=200$ GeV, compared with PHENIX measurements (green squares), and Duke (blue line) and PHSD (orange line) model calculations. Vertical bars and boxes around data points represent statistical and systematic uncertainties from Au+Au measurements, respectively. The gray band represents the $N_{\rm coll}$ uncertainties. The boxes at unity show the global uncertainties including the total uncertainties of the $p$+$p$ reference.

Pseudorapidity distribution of inclusive photons measured within $2.3<\eta_{\rm lab}<3.9$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$.

Pseudorapidity distribution of inclusive photons measured within $2.3<\eta_{\rm lab}<3.9$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$.

Pseudorapidity distribution of inclusive photons measured within $2.3<\eta_{\rm lab}<3.9$ in Pb-p collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$.

Pseudorapidity distribution of inclusive photons measured within $2.3<\eta_{\rm lab}<3.9$ in pp collisions at various LHC energies.

$\langle N_{\rm \gamma} \rangle$ measured within $2.3<\eta_{\rm lab}<3.9$ as a function of collision energy in pp collisions.

Centrality-dependent pseudorapidity distribution of inclusive photons measured within $2.3<\eta_{\rm lab}<3.9$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$ (Centrality estimator - CL1).

Centrality-dependent pseudorapidity distribution of inclusive photons measured within $2.3<\eta_{\rm lab}<3.9$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$ (Centrality estimator - ZNA).

$\langle N_{\rm \gamma} \rangle$ measured within $2.3<\eta_{\rm lab}<3.9$ as a function of $\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ for CL1 centrality estimator in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$.

$\langle N_{\rm \gamma} \rangle$ measured within $2.3<\eta_{\rm lab}<3.9$ as a function of $\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ for ZNA (high-$p_{\rm T}$) centrality estimator in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$.

$\langle N_{\rm \gamma} \rangle$ measured within $2.3<\eta_{\rm lab}<3.9$ as a function of $\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ for ZNA (Pb-side) centrality estimator in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$.

Values of $\langle N_{\rm \gamma} \rangle$/$\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ as a function of $\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ for CL1 centrality estimator in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$.

Values of $\langle N_{\rm \gamma} \rangle$/$\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ as a function of $\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ for ZNA (high-$p_{\rm T}$) centrality estimator in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$.

Values of $\langle N_{\rm \gamma} \rangle$/$\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ as a function of $\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ for ZNA (Pb-side) centrality estimator in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$.

Values of $\langle N_{\rm \gamma} \rangle$/$\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ as a function of $\langle N_{\rm \gamma} \rangle$ for CL1 centrality estimator in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$.

Values of $\langle N_{\rm \gamma} \rangle$/$\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ as a function of $\langle N_{\rm \gamma} \rangle$ for ZNA (high-$p_{\rm T}$) centrality estimator in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$.

Values of $\langle N_{\rm \gamma} \rangle$/$\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ as a function of $\langle N_{\rm \gamma} \rangle$ for ZNA (Pb-side) centrality estimator in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5020~\mathrm{GeV}$.

The Au+Au 200 GeV measurements of the two-, four- and six-particle elliptic flow and the elliptic flow fluctuations.

The Au+Au 54.4 GeV measurements of the two-, four- and six-particle elliptic flow and the elliptic flow fluctuations.

The Au+Au 39 GeV measurements of the two-, four- and six-particle elliptic flow and the elliptic flow fluctuations.

The Au+Au 27 GeV measurements of the two-, four- and six-particle elliptic flow and the elliptic flow fluctuations.

The Au+Au 19.6 GeV measurements of the two- and four-particle elliptic flow and the elliptic flow fluctuations.

The Au+Au 11.5 GeV measurements of the two- and four-particle elliptic flow and the elliptic flow fluctuations.

The U+U 193 GeV measurements of the two-, four- and six-particle elliptic flow and the elliptic flow fluctuations.

The Cu+Au 200 GeV measurements of the two-, four- and six-particle elliptic flow and the elliptic flow fluctuations.

(a) The HFE (electrons from semileptonic decays of heavy-flavor hadrons) cross section at STAR in $p$+$p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV from $2012$ (filled circles) and the FONLL calculations (curves). (b) Ratio of data over FONLL calculations. The vertical bars and the boxes represent statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively.

fig2_left_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_case2_ruru_nonzeros.

fig2_left_top_isobarpaper_star_grey_data_ruru_nonzeros.

fig2_left_top_isobarpaper_star_red_case3_ruru_nonzeros.

fig2_right_isobarpaper_star_grey_data_nonzero.

fig2_right_low_isobarpaper_star_red_case3_nonzero.

fig2_right_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_case2_nonzero.

fig3_olow_isobarpaper_star_blue_mean_multiplicity_ratio.

fig3_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_mean_multiplicity_zrzr.

fig3_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_mean_multiplicity_ruru.

fig4_left_low_isobarpaper_star_blue_v2_tpc_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig4_left_low_isobarpaper_star_green_v2_tpc_eta_gt1_ratio.

fig4_left_low_isobarpaper_star_purple_v2_subEv_ratio.

fig4_left_low_isobarpaper_star_red_v2_epd_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig4_left_low_isobarpaper_star_yellow_v2_EP_ratio.

fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_v2_2_zrzr.

fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_v2_2_ruru.

fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_green_open_v2_tpc_eta_gt1_zrzr.

fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_green_solid_v2_tpc_eta_gt1_ruru.

fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_purple_open_v2_subEv_zrzr.

fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_purple_solid_v2_subEv_ruru.

fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_red_open_v2_tpcepd_zrzr.

fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_red_solid_v2_tpcepd_ruru.

fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_yellow_open_v2_EP_zrzr.

fig4_left_top_isobarpaper_star_yellow_solid_v2_EP_ruru.

fig4_right_low_isobarpaper_star_green_v2_4_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig4_right_low_isobarpaper_star_green_v2_zdc_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig4_right_top_isobarpaper_star_green_open_v2_4_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values". "Imaginary number of v_2{4} is presented as negative value”

fig4_right_top_isobarpaper_star_green_solid_v2_4_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values". "Imaginary number of v_2{4} is presented as negative value”

fig4_right_top_isobarpaper_star_grey_open_v2_zdc_zrzr.

fig4_right_top_isobarpaper_star_grey_solid_v2_zdc_ruru.

fig5_olow_isobarpaper_star_green_group-2. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig5_olow_isobarpaper_star_purple_group-4.

fig5_olow_isobarpaper_star_yellow_group-3. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig5_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_group-1. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig5_otop_isobarpaper_star_green_group-2.

fig5_otop_isobarpaper_star_red_group-3. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig6_olow_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_v2_ratio.

fig6_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_v2_zrzr.

fig6_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_v2_ruru.

fig7_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_Ddelta_zrzr.

fig7_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_Ddelta_ratio.

fig7_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_Ddelta_ruru.

fig8_olow_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_Dgamma_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig8_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_Dgamma_zrzr.

fig8_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_Dgamma_ruru.

fig9_olow_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_kappa_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig9_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_kappa_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig9_otop_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_kappa_ruru.

fig10_left_low_isobarpaper_star_blue_v2_tpc_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig10_left_low_isobarpaper_star_green_v3_tpc_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig10_left_low_isobarpaper_star_red_v2_epd_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig10_left_low_isobarpaper_star_yellow_v3_epd_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig10_left_mid_isobarpaper_star_green_open_v3_tpc_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig10_left_mid_isobarpaper_star_green_solid_v3_tpc_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig10_left_mid_isobarpaper_star_yellow_open_v3_epd_zrzr.

fig10_left_mid_isobarpaper_star_yellow_solid_v3_epd_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig10_left_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_v2_tpc_zrzr.

fig10_left_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_v2_tpc_ruru.

fig10_left_top_isobarpaper_star_red_open_v2_epd_zrzr.

fig10_left_top_isobarpaper_star_red_solid_v2_epd_ruru.

fig10_right_low_isobarpaper_star_blue_v3_subEv_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig10_right_low_isobarpaper_star_green_v3_tpc_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig10_right_low_isobarpaper_star_purple_v3_tpc_eta_gt1_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig10_right_low_isobarpaper_star_yellow_v3_epd_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_v3_subEv_zrzr.

fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_v3_subEv_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_green_open_v3_tpc_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_green_solid_v3_tpc_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_purple_open_v3_tpc_eta_gt1_zrzr.

fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_purple_solid_v3_tpc_eta_gt1_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_yellow_open_v3_epd_zrzr.

fig10_right_top_isobarpaper_star_yellow_solid_v3_epd_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig11_low_isobarpaper_star_black_g2_tpc_ratio.

fig11_low_isobarpaper_star_blue_g3_tpc_ratio.

fig11_low_isobarpaper_star_red_Ddelta_ratio.

fig11_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_g3_tpc_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig11_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_g3_tpc_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig11_top_isobarpaper_star_black_open_g2_tpc_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig11_top_isobarpaper_star_black_solid_g2_tpc_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig12_low_isobarpaper_star_black_g2_subEv_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig12_low_isobarpaper_star_blue_g3_subEv_ratio.

fig12_low_isobarpaper_star_red_Ddelta_ratio.

fig12_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_g3_subEv_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig12_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_g3_subEv_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig12_top_isobarpaper_star_black_open_g2_subEv_zrzr.

fig12_top_isobarpaper_star_black_solid_g2_subEv_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig13_low_isobarpaper_star_black_g2_epd_ratio.

fig13_low_isobarpaper_star_blue_g3_epd_ratio.

fig13_low_isobarpaper_star_red_Ddelta_ratio.

fig13_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_g3_epd_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig13_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_g3_epd_ruru.

fig13_top_isobarpaper_star_black_open_g2_epd_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig13_top_isobarpaper_star_black_solid_g2_epd_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig14_low_isobarpaper_star_black_solid_k2_ratio.

fig14_low_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_k3_ratio.

fig14_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_k3_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig14_mid_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_k3_ruru.

fig14_top_isobarpaper_star_black_open_k2_zrzr.

fig14_top_isobarpaper_star_black_solid_k2_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_left_lowerleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_tpc_ss_zrzr_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_left_lowerleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_square_tpc_os_zrzr_40-50.

fig15_left_lowerleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_tpc_ss_ruru_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_left_lowerleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_square_tpc_os_ruru_40-50.

fig15_left_lowerrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_epd_ss_zrzr_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_left_lowerrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_square_epd_os_zrzr_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_left_lowerrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_epd_ss_ruru_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_left_lowerrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_square_epd_os_ruru_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_left_midleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_tpc_ss_zrzr_30-40.

fig15_left_midleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_square_tpc_os_zrzr_30-40.

fig15_left_midleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_tpc_ss_ruru_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_left_midleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_square_tpc_os_ruru_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_left_midrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_epd_ss_zrzr_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_left_midrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_square_epd_os_zrzr_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_left_midrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_epd_ss_ruru_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_left_midrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_square_epd_os_ruru_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_left_topleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_tpc_ss_zrzr_20-30.

fig15_left_topleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_square_tpc_os_zrzr_20-30.

fig15_left_topleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_tpc_ss_ruru_20-30.

fig15_left_topleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_square_tpc_os_ruru_20-30.

fig15_left_toprightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_epd_ss_zrzr_20-30. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_left_toprightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_square_epd_os_zrzr_20-30. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_left_toprightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_epd_ss_ruru_20-30.

fig15_left_toprightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_square_epd_os_ruru_20-30.

fig15_right_lowerleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_tpc_Deltagamma_zrzr_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_right_lowerleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_tpc_Deltagamma_ruru_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_right_lowerrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_epd_Deltagamma_zrzr_40-50. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_right_lowerrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_epd_Deltagamma_ruru_40-50.

fig15_right_midleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_tpc_Deltagamma_zrzr_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_right_midleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_tpc_Deltagamma_ruru_30-40.

fig15_right_midrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_epd_Deltagamma_zrzr_30-40. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_right_midrightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_epd_Deltagamma_ruru_30-40.

fig15_right_topleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_tpc_Deltagamma_zrzr_20-30.

fig15_right_topleftpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_tpc_Deltagamma_ruru_20-30.

fig15_right_toprightpanel_isobarpaper_star_blue_circle_epd_Deltagamma_zrzr_20-30. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig15_right_toprightpanel_isobarpaper_star_red_circle_epd_Deltagamma_ruru_20-30. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig16_a_blue_zrzr.

fig16_a_red_ruru.

fig16_b.

fig17_a_blue_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig17_a_red_ruru.

fig17_b. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig18_a_blue_ruru_ZDCdg.

fig18_a_red_ruru_TPCdg.

fig18_b_blue_ruru_ZDCv2.

fig18_b_red_ruru_TPCv2.

fig18_c_blue_ruru_A. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig18_c_red_ruru_a.

fig18_d_red_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig18_e_blue_zrzr_ZDCdg.

fig18_e_red_zrzr_TPCdg.

fig18_f_blue_zrzr_ZDCv2.

fig18_f_red_zrzr_TPCv2.

fig18_g_blue_zrzr_A. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig18_g_red_zrzr_a. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig18_h_red_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig19_a_blue_zrzr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig19_a_red_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig19_b_blue_zrzr.

fig19_b_red_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig21_doubleratio.

fig22_doubleratio_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig22_doubleratio_zrzr.

fig22_fcme_ruru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig22_fcme_zrzr.

fig23_ratio_v22.

fig23_ratio_v24. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig23_ratio_v2z. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig23_v22_ru.

fig23_v22_zr.

fig23_v24_ru. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values". "Imaginary number of v_2{4} is presented as negative value”

fig23_v24_zr. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values". "Imaginary number of v_2{4} is presented as negative value”

fig23_v2z_ru.

fig23_v2z_zr.

fig24_a_isobarpaper_star_ruru_q2_0-20.

fig24_a_isobarpaper_star_ruru_q2_20-40.

fig24_a_isobarpaper_star_ruru_q2_40-60.

fig24_a_isobarpaper_star_ruru_q2_60-100.

fig24_b_isobarpaper_ruru.

fig24_c_isobarpaper_ruru.

fig24_d_isobarpaper_star_zrzr_q2_0-20.

fig24_d_isobarpaper_star_zrzr_q2_20-40.

fig24_d_isobarpaper_star_zrzr_q2_40-60.

fig24_d_isobarpaper_star_zrzr_q2_60-100.

fig24_e_isobarpaper_zrzr.

fig24_f_isobarpaper_zrzr.

fig25_a_isobarpaper_star_blue_open_zrzr_0-10.

fig25_a_isobarpaper_star_blue_solid_ruru_0-10.

fig25_b_isobarpaper_star_red_open_zrzr_10-30.

fig25_b_isobarpaper_star_red_solid_ruru_10-30.

fig25_c_isobarpaper_star_green_open_zrzr_30-50.

fig25_c_isobarpaper_star_green_solid_ruru_30-50.

fig25_d_isobarpaper_star_orange_open_zrzr_20-50.

fig25_d_isobarpaper_star_orange_solid_ruru_20-50.

fig25_e_isobarpaper_star_open_zrzr.

fig25_e_isobarpaper_star_solid_ruru.

fig25_f_isobarpaper_star_solid_ratio. "For points without systematic uncertainties, using the method for estimating systematic uncertainties as described in the paper yields 0 values"

fig26_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_1. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{EP,TPC}" Group-1

fig26_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_2. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{3PC,TPC}" Group-2

fig26_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_3. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{3PC,TPC}" Group-3

fig26_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_4. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SE,TPC}" Group-2

fig26_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_5. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SE,TPC}" Group-3

fig26_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_6. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SE,TPC}" Group-4

fig26_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_7. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SP,EPD}" Group-2

fig26_isobarpaper_star_blue_R. "{/Symbol s}@^{-1}_{R_{/Symbol Y}_2}" Group-5

fig26_isobarpaper_star_darkgreen_k_9. "{/Symbol k}_{112}" Group-1

fig26_isobarpaper_star_darkgreen_k_10. "k_{2}" Group-2

fig26_isobarpaper_star_grey_deltagamma_by_v3. "({/Symbol Dg}_{123}/v_{3})_{3PC,TPC}" Group-2

fig26_isobarpaper_star_lightgreen_k. "k_{3}" Group-2

fig27_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_1. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{EP,TPC}" Group-1

fig27_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_2. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{3PC,TPC}" Group-2

fig27_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_3. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{3PC,TPC}" Group-3

fig27_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_4. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SE,TPC}" Group-2

fig27_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_5. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SE,TPC}" Group-3

fig27_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_6. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SE,TPC}" Group-4

fig27_isobarpaper_star_black_deltagamma_by_v2_7. "({/Symbol Dg}_{112}/v_{2})_{SP,EPD}" Group-2

fig27_isobarpaper_star_blue_R.txt. "{/Symbol s}@^{-1}_{R_{/Symbol Y}_2}" Group-5

fig27_isobarpaper_star_darkgreen_k_9. "{/Symbol k}_{112}" Group-1

fig27_isobarpaper_star_darkgreen_k_10. "k_{2}" Group-2

fig27_isobarpaper_star_grey_deltagamma_by_v3. "({/Symbol Dg}_{123}/v_{3})_{3PC,TPC}" Group-2

fig27_isobarpaper_star_lightgreen_k. "k_{3}" Group-2

fig27_isobarpaper_star_purple_r_n_13. "r(m_{inv})" Group-3

fig27_isobarpaper_star_purple_r_n_14. "1/N@_{trk}^{offline}"

Event by event net-proton multiplicity, $\Delta N_{p}$, distributions for Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV in 0-10% and 30-40% centralities at midrapidity (|y| < 0.5) for the transverse momentum range of 0.4 < $p_{T}$ (GeV/c) < 2.0. These distributions are normalized by the corresponding numbers of events and are not corrected for detector efficiencies. Statistical uncertainties are shown as vertical lines. The dashed lines show the Skellam distributions for each collision energy and centrality. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the data to the Skellam expectations.

Event by event net-proton multiplicity, $\Delta N_{p}$, distributions for Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV in 0-10% and 30-40% centralities at midrapidity (|y| < 0.5) for the transverse momentum range of 0.4 < $p_{T}$ (GeV/c) < 2.0. These distributions are normalized by the corresponding numbers of events and are not corrected for detector efficiencies. Statistical uncertainties are shown as vertical lines. The dashed lines show the Skellam distributions for each collision energy and centrality. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the data to the Skellam expectations.

Event by event net-proton multiplicity, $\Delta N_{p}$, distributions for Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV in 0-10% and 30-40% centralities at midrapidity (|y| < 0.5) for the transverse momentum range of 0.4 < $p_{T}$ (GeV/c) < 2.0. These distributions are normalized by the corresponding numbers of events and are not corrected for detector efficiencies. Statistical uncertainties are shown as vertical lines. The dashed lines show the Skellam distributions for each collision energy and centrality. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the data to the Skellam expectations.

Net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ as a function of rapidity (left) and transverse momentum acceptance (right) from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27 GeV (crosses), 54.4 (open squares), and 200 GeV (filled circles) Au+Au collisions. The upper and lower plots are for 0-10% and 30-40% centralities, respectively. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. UrQMD transport model results are shown as shaded and hatched bands. The Skellam expectation ($C_{6}/C_{2} = 1) is shown as long-dashed lines.

Net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ as a function of rapidity (left) and transverse momentum acceptance (right) from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27 GeV (crosses), 54.4 (open squares), and 200 GeV (filled circles) Au+Au collisions. The upper and lower plots are for 0-10% and 30-40% centralities, respectively. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. UrQMD transport model results are shown as shaded and hatched bands. The Skellam expectation ($C_{6}/C_{2} = 1) is shown as long-dashed lines.

Net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ as a function of rapidity (left) and transverse momentum acceptance (right) from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27 GeV (crosses), 54.4 (open squares), and 200 GeV (filled circles) Au+Au collisions. The upper and lower plots are for 0-10% and 30-40% centralities, respectively. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. UrQMD transport model results are shown as shaded and hatched bands. The Skellam expectation ($C_{6}/C_{2} = 1) is shown as long-dashed lines.

Net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ as a function of rapidity (left) and transverse momentum acceptance (right) from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27 GeV (crosses), 54.4 (open squares), and 200 GeV (filled circles) Au+Au collisions. The upper and lower plots are for 0-10% and 30-40% centralities, respectively. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. UrQMD transport model results are shown as shaded and hatched bands. The Skellam expectation ($C_{6}/C_{2} = 1) is shown as long-dashed lines.

Net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ as a function of rapidity (left) and transverse momentum acceptance (right) from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27 GeV (crosses), 54.4 (open squares), and 200 GeV (filled circles) Au+Au collisions. The upper and lower plots are for 0-10% and 30-40% centralities, respectively. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. UrQMD transport model results are shown as shaded and hatched bands. The Skellam expectation ($C_{6}/C_{2} = 1) is shown as long-dashed lines.

Net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ as a function of rapidity (left) and transverse momentum acceptance (right) from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27 GeV (crosses), 54.4 (open squares), and 200 GeV (filled circles) Au+Au collisions. The upper and lower plots are for 0-10% and 30-40% centralities, respectively. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. UrQMD transport model results are shown as shaded and hatched bands. The Skellam expectation ($C_{6}/C_{2} = 1) is shown as long-dashed lines.

Collisions centrality dependence of net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ in Au+Au collisions for |$y$| < 0.5 and 0.4 < $p_{T}$ (GeV/c) < 2.0. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. A shaded band shows the results from UrQMD model calculations. UrQMD calculations from the above three collision energies are consistent among them so they are merged in order to reduce statistical fluctuations. Details on these calculations can be found in the Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher]. The lattice QCD calculations [16, 17] for T = 160 MeV and $\mu_{B}$ < 110 MeV. are shown as a blue band at $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ $\approx$ 340.

Collisions centrality dependence of net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ in Au+Au collisions for |$y$| < 0.5 and 0.4 < $p_{T}$ (GeV/c) < 2.0. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. A shaded band shows the results from UrQMD model calculations. UrQMD calculations from the above three collision energies are consistent among them so they are merged in order to reduce statistical fluctuations. Details on these calculations can be found in the Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher]. The lattice QCD calculations [16, 17] for T = 160 MeV and $\mu_{B}$ < 110 MeV. are shown as a blue band at $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ $\approx$ 340.

Collisions centrality dependence of net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ in Au+Au collisions for |$y$| < 0.5 and 0.4 < $p_{T}$ (GeV/c) < 2.0. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. A shaded band shows the results from UrQMD model calculations. UrQMD calculations from the above three collision energies are consistent among them so they are merged in order to reduce statistical fluctuations. Details on these calculations can be found in the Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher]. The lattice QCD calculations [16, 17] for T = 160 MeV and $\mu_{B}$ < 110 MeV. are shown as a blue band at $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ $\approx$ 340.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Cumulants and their ratios up to the sixth order corrected for non-binomial efficiencies for 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-5% centrality. The CBWC is applied for 2.5% centrality bin width. Results from the conventional efficiency correction are shown as black filled circles, results from the unfolding with the binomial detector response are shown as black open circles, and results from beta-binomial detector response with $\alpha+\sigma$, $\alpha$ and $\alpha-\sigma$ are shown in green triangles, red squares and blue triangles, respectively. C5, C6, C2/C1, C5/C1 and C6/C2 are scaled by constant shown in each column.

Collision centrality dependence of net-proton C6/C2 in Au+Au collisions for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV within |y| < 0.5 and 0.4 < pT (GeV/c) < 2.0. Results with and without the CBWC are overlaid. The results are corrected for detector efficiencies. Points for different calculation methods are staggered horizontally to improve clarity.

Collision centrality dependence of net-proton C6/C2 in Au+Au collisions for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV within |y| < 0.5 and 0.4 < pT (GeV/c) < 2.0. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. Shaded and hatched bands show the results from UrQMD model calculations The lattice QCD calculations [13, 14] for T = 160 MeV and $\mu_{B}$ < 110 MeV. are shown as a blue band at $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ $\approx$ 340.

The fully corrected jet mass distribution for $R = 0.4$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets with $25 < p_{\rm{T,jet}} < 30$ GeV$/c$. Data are reported beyond the x-axis upper limit of the figure, for future reference. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The fully corrected jet mass distribution for $R = 0.4$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets with $30 < p_{\rm{T,jet}} < 40$ GeV$/c$. Data are reported beyond the x-axis upper limit of the figure, for future reference. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The fully corrected SoftDrop groomed jet mass distribution for $R = 0.4$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets with $20 < p_{\rm{T,jet}} < 25$ GeV$/c$. Data are reported beyond the x-axis upper limit of the figure, for future reference. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The fully corrected SoftDrop groomed jet mass distribution for $R = 0.4$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets with $25 < p_{\rm{T,jet}} < 30$ GeV$/c$. Data are reported beyond the x-axis upper limit of the figure, for future reference. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The fully corrected SoftDrop groomed jet mass distribution for $R = 0.4$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets with $30 < p_{\rm{T,jet}} < 40$ GeV$/c$. Data are reported beyond the x-axis upper limit of the figure, for future reference. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The fully corrected jet mass distribution for $R = 0.2$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets with $30 < p_{\rm{T,jet}} < 40$ GeV$/c$. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The fully corrected jet mass distribution for $R = 0.4$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets with $30 < p_{\rm{T,jet}} < 40$ GeV$/c$. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The fully corrected jet mass distribution for $R = 0.6$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets with $30 < p_{\rm{T,jet}} < 40$ GeV$/c$. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The fully corrected SoftDrop groomed jet mass distribution for $R = 0.2$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets with $30 < p_{\rm{T,jet}} < 40$ GeV$/c$. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The fully corrected SoftDrop groomed jet mass distribution for $R = 0.4$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets with $30 < p_{\rm{T,jet}} < 40$ GeV$/c$. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The fully corrected SoftDrop groomed jet mass distribution for $R = 0.6$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets with $30 < p_{\rm{T,jet}} < 40$ GeV$/c$. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The mean of the fully corrected jet mass distribution for $R=0.2$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets as a function of $p_{\rm{T,jet}}$. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The mean of the fully corrected jet mass distribution for $R=0.4$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets as a function of $p_{\rm{T,jet}}$. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The mean of the fully corrected jet mass distribution for $R=0.6$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets as a function of $p_{\rm{T,jet}}$. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The mean of the fully corrected SoftDrop groomed jet mass distribution for $R=0.2$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets as a function of $p_{\rm{T,jet}}$. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The mean of the fully corrected SoftDrop groomed jet mass distribution for $R=0.4$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets as a function of $p_{\rm{T,jet}}$. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The mean of the fully corrected SoftDrop groomed jet mass distribution for $R=0.6$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets as a function of $p_{\rm{T,jet}}$. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The fully corrected jet mass distribution for $R = 0.6$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets with $20 < p_{\rm{T,jet}} < 25$ GeV$/c$. Data are reported beyond the x-axis upper limit of the figure, for future reference. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The fully corrected SoftDrop groomed jet mass distribution for $R = 0.6$ anti-$k_{\rm{T}}$ jets with $20 < p_{\rm{T,jet}} < 25$ GeV$/c$. Data are reported beyond the x-axis upper limit of the figure, for future reference. Updated to correct a small bug that had shifted the jet mass to slightly smaller values.

The $p_{\text{T}}$ dependence of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The $p_{\text{T}}$ dependence of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The $p_{\text{T}}$ dependence of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The $p_{\text{T}}$ dependence of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The $p_{\text{T}}$ dependence of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The $p_{\text{T}}$ dependence of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The $p_{\text{T}}$ dependence of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The $p_{\text{T}}$ dependence of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The $p_{\text{T}}$ dependence of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The $p_{\text{T}}$ dependence of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The $p_{\text{T}}$ dependence of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The $p_{\text{T}}$ dependence of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The $p_{\text{T}}$ dependence of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV for different centrality classes. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Flow coefficients $v_{n}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy $KE_{\text{T}}/n_{q}$ for various particles at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

The flow coefficients $v_{n}$ scaled by $\varepsilon_{n}\left\lbrace 2\right\rbrace$ as a function of $p_{\text{T}}$ at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

$v_{n}$ coefficients, scaled by the number of constituent quarks $(n_{q})$ to the power $n/2$ and participant eccentricity $\varepsilon_{n}$, of identified particles versus $(m_{T}-m_{0})/n_{q}$ for three centrality bins in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties. The bands represent point-by-point systematic uncertainties.

Ratios of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1.0) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. Error bars represent statistical uncertainties.

Ratios of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1.0) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. Error bars represent statistical uncertainties.

Ratios of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1.0) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. Error bars represent statistical uncertainties.

Ratios of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1.0) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. Error bars represent statistical uncertainties.

Ratios of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1.0) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. Error bars represent statistical uncertainties.

Ratios of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1.0) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. Error bars represent statistical uncertainties.

Ratios of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1.0) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. Error bars represent statistical uncertainties.

Ratios of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1.0) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. Error bars represent statistical uncertainties.

Ratios of $v_{n}$ coefficients at mid-rapidity ($|y| <$ 1.0) in minimum bias U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV. Error bars represent statistical uncertainties.