Normalisation factors for the major background processes and ttW ($\Delta \eta < 0$) from the fit using only statistical uncertainties (fixing Nuisance Parameters (NP) to their fitted values) to data in all analysis regions.

Normalisation factors for the major background processes and ttW ($\Delta \eta < 0$) from the fit using using both statistical and systematic uncertainties to data in all analysis regions.

Correlation matrix between the Normalisation Factors in the fit using only statistical uncertainties (fixing Nuisance Parameters (NP) to their fitted values) to data in all analysis regions.

The most relevant systematic uncertainties ranked by their impact on the leptonic charge asymmetry ($A_c^{\ell}$) parameter at reconstructed level. The impact of the uncertainties is shown before and after the combined profile-likelihood fit to data in the signal and control regions. Pulls introduced by the fitting procedure are also shown. The entries shown in bold are the uncertainties of the freely floating background normalisations. ME stands for "matrix element", PS for "parton shower" and JER for "jet energy resolution". The gamma-uncertainties refer to the MC statistical uncertainties in a specific region and bin.

The most relevant systematic uncertainties ranked by their impact on the ttW Normalisation Factor ($\Delta \eta < 0$) parameter at reconstructed level. The impact of the uncertainties is shown before and after the combined profile-likelihood fit to data in the signal and control regions. Pulls introduced by the fitting procedure are also shown. ME stands for "matrix element", PS for "parton shower" and JER for "jet energy resolution". The gamma-uncertainties refer to the MC statistical uncertainties in a specific region and bin.

The predicted and observed numbers of events in the control and signal regions. The predictions are shown before the fit to data. The indicated uncertainties consider statistical as well as all experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties. Background categories with event yields with a value of 1.0e-6 have a negligible contribution to the region and are manually set to that value.

The predicted and observed numbers of events in the control and signal regions. The predictions are shown after the fit to data. The indicated uncertainties consider statistical as well as all experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties. Background categories with event yields with a value of 1.0e-6 have a negligible contribution to the region and are manually set to that value.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded inclusive leptonic asymmetry. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ < 500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [500,750] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [750,1000] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [1000,1500] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ > 1500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ < 30 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [30,120] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ > 120 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 200 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [200,300] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [300,400] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 400 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 20 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [20, 70] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 70 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Correlation coefficients $\rho_{i,j}$ for the statistical and systematic uncertainties between the $i$-th and $j$-th bin of the differential $A_E$ measurement as a function of the jet scattering angle $\theta_j$

The effects on the energy asymmetry of $1\sigma$ variations in its influencing nuisance parameters for the three $\theta_j$ bins. These are extracted from the samples of the posterior distribution with $\sigma_i^{(j)} = c_{ij}/\sqrt{c_{jj}}$ being the estimated shift of bin $i$ in conjunction with a shift $\Delta\theta_j$ of nuisance parameter $j$. The data statistical (Data stat.) uncertainty is obtained from running the unfolding with all nuisance parameters being fixed to their post-marginalised values, the MC statistical uncertainty on the response matrix ($t\bar{t}$ response MC stat.) is evaluated using a bootstrapping method from the covariance matrix of the ensemble of repeated unfolding results with varied response matrices. The $\gamma$ variations denote the statistical uncertainties of the background predictions in the corresponding bin of the $\Delta E$ vs $\theta_{j}$ distribution. The numbers appended to the $W$+jets PDF variations denote the corresponding NNPDF3.0 PDF sets.

The effects on the energy asymmetry of $1\sigma$ variations in its influencing nuisance parameters for the three $\theta_j$ bins. These are extracted from the samples of the posterior distribution with $\sigma_i^{(j)} = c_{ij}/\sqrt{c_{jj}}$ being the estimated shift of bin $i$ in conjunction with a shift $\Delta\theta_j$ of nuisance parameter $j$. The data statistical (Data stat.) uncertainty is obtained from running the unfolding with all nuisance parameters being fixed to their post-marginalised values, the MC statistical uncertainty on the response matrix ($t\bar{t}$ response MC stat.) is evaluated using a bootstrapping method from the covariance matrix of the ensemble of repeated unfolding results with varied response matrices. The $\gamma$ variations denote the statistical uncertainties of the background predictions in the corresponding bin of the $\Delta E$ vs $\theta_{j}$ distribution. The numbers appended to the $W$+jets PDF variations denote the corresponding NNPDF3.0 PDF sets.

Covariances $c_{ij}$ for the highest ranked systematic uncertainties in the energy asymmetry measurement differential in $\theta_j$.

Covariances $c_{ij}$ for the highest ranked systematic uncertainties in the energy asymmetry measurement differential in $\theta_j$.

Definition of the fiducial phase space with lepton candidate ($\ell$), hadronic top candidate ($j_h$), leptonic top candidate ($j_l$) and associated jet candidate ($j_a$).

Definition of the fiducial phase space with lepton candidate ($\ell$), hadronic top candidate ($j_h$), leptonic top candidate ($j_l$) and associated jet candidate ($j_a$).

Bounds on individual Wilson coefficients $C($TeV$/\Lambda)^2$ from the energy asymmetry, obtained from a combined fit to its values in all three $\theta_j$ bins.

Bounds on individual Wilson coefficients $C($TeV$/\Lambda)^2$ from the energy asymmetry, obtained from a combined fit to its values in all three $\theta_j$ bins.

The ratios of the $Wj$, $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ cross-sections to the $Z^0 j$ cross-section, and the ratio of the $W^+j$ to $W^-j$ cross-sections.

The asymmetry of $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ production, given by $A(Wj)\equiv (\sigma_{W^+j}-\sigma_{W^-j})/(\sigma_{W^+j}+\sigma_{W^-j})$.

The asymmetry of $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ production, given by $A(Wj)\equiv (\sigma_{W^+j}-\sigma_{W^-j})/(\sigma_{W^+j}+\sigma_{W^-j})$.

The measured cross-sections for $Wj$ production in four bins of $\eta^{\mu}$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Wj$ production in four bins of $\eta^{\mu}$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Wj$ production in four bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Wj$ production in four bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Wj$ production in five bins of $p^{\rm jet}_T$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Wj$ production in five bins of $p^{\rm jet}_T$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Zj$ production in four bins of $y^Z$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Z^0 j$ production in four bins of $y^Z$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Zj$ production in four bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Z^0 j$ production in four bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Zj$ production in bins of $p^{\rm jet}_T$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Z^0 j$ production in bins of $p^{\rm jet}_T$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Zj$ production in bins of $|\Delta\phi|$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Z^0 j$ production in bins of $|\Delta\phi|$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 1 in bins of $\eta^{\mu}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 1 in bins of $\eta^{\mu}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 1 in bins of $\eta^{\mu}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 1 in bins of $\eta^{\mu}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 5 in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 5 in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 5 in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 5 in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 3 in bins of $p_T^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 3 in bins of $p_T^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 3 in bins of $p_T^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 3 in bins of $p_T^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Zj$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 4 as a function of $y^Z$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Z^0 j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 4 as a function of $y^Z$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Zj$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 5 as a function of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Z^0 j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 5 as a function of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Zj$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 6 as a function of $p_T^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Z^0 j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 6 as a function of $p_T^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Zj$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 7 as a function of $|\Delta\phi|$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Z^0 j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 7 as a function of $|\Delta\phi|$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 1 in bins of $\eta\mu$. The first four rows/columns correspond to the $W^+j$ cross-section in bins of $\eta\mu$ and the second four rows/columns correspond to the $W^-j$ cross-section in bins of $\eta\mu$. The matrix is used to calculate the ratio and asymmetry of $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ production as a function of $\eta\mu$.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 1 in bins of $\eta^\mu$. The matrix is used to calculate the ratio and asymmetry of $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ production as a function of $\eta^\mu$.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$, $W^-j$ and $Zj$ production cross-section measurements presented in Tables 2 and 5 in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The first four rows/columns correspond to the $W^+j$ cross-section in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, the middle four correspond to the $W^-j$ cross-section in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$ and the final four correspond to the $Zj$ cross-section in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The matrix is used to calculate the ratios of $Wj$ to $Zj$ production and the charge ratio and asymmetry of $Wj$ production in the total fiducial region.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$, $W^-j$ and $Z^0 j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Tables 2 and 5 in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The matrix is used to calculate the ratios of $Wj$ to $Z^0 j$ production and the charge ratio and asymmetry of $Wj$ production in the total fiducial region.

Optimised angular observables evaluated by the unbinned maximum likelihood fit. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.

CP-averaged angular observables evaluated using the method of moments. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.

CP-asymmetries evaluated using the method of moments. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.

Optimised observables evaluated using the method of moments. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic.

Zero-crossing points determined with an amplitude fit.

Likelihood correlation matrix $0.1 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $2.5 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2< 12.5 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 < q^2 < 17.0 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $0.1 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $2.5 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2< 12.5 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 17.0 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $0.1 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $2.5 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2< 12.5 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 17.0 ~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2< 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Likelihood correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2< 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $0.10 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $2.0 < q^2 < 3.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $3.0 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $4.0 < q^2 < 5.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $5.0 < q^2 < 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 7.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $7.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.00 <q^2 < 11.75~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.75 <q^2 < 12.50~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 16.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $16.0 <q^2 < 17.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2 < 18.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $18.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $0.10 < q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $1.1 < q^2 < 2.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $2.0 < q^2 < 3.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $3.0 < q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $4.0 < q^2 < 5.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $5.0 < q^2 < 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $6.0 < q^2 < 7.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $7.0 < q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.00 <q^2 < 11.75~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.75 <q^2 < 12.50~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 16.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $16.0 <q^2 < 17.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $17.0 <q^2 < 18.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $18.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $0.1 <q^2 < 0.98~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $1.1 <q^2 < 2.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $2.0 <q^2 < 3.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $3.0 <q^2 < 4.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $4.0 <q^2 < 5.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $5.0 <q^2 < 6.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $6.0 <q^2 < 7.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $7.0 <q^2 < 8.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.0 <q^2 < 11.75~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $11.75 <q^2 < 12.5~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 <q^2 < 16.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $16.0 <q^2 < 17.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $17.0 < q^2 < 18.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $18.0 < q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Bootstrap correlation matrix $15.0 < q^2 < 19.0~{\rm GeV}^2/c^4$.

Inclusive cross-section for $Z$ boson production in bins of PHI*. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic, beam and luminosity.

Inclusive cross-section for $Z$ boson production in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic, beam and luminosity.

$W^{\pm}$ to $Z$ boson cross-section ratio in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic, beam and luminosity.

Ratio of $W^+$ to $W^-$ cross-section in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic and beam.

Lepton charge asymmetry in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic and beam.

Ratios of $W^{\pm}$ to $Z$ boson cross-section ratios at differnent centre-of-mass energy (8 TeV to 7 TeV) in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical and systematic.

Inclusive cross-section for $Z$ boson production in bins of muon pseudorapidity at centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic, beam and luminosity.

$W^{\pm}$ to $Z$ boson cross-section ratio in bins of muon pseudorapidity at centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic, beam and luminosity.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of lepton $\eta$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded. This table lists bin-to-bin correlations for $W^{+}$.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of lepton $\eta$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded. This table lists bin-to-bin correlations for $W^{-}$.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of lepton $\eta$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded. This table lists differential cross-section correlations between $W^{-}$ and $W^{+}$ bins.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $y_{Z}$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of transverse momentum. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $\phi^{*}$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients between differential cross-section measurements as a function $y_{Z}$ and $W^{+}$ boson muon $\eta$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients between differential cross-section measurements as a function $y_{Z}$ and $W^{-}$ boson muon $\eta$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $\eta^{\mu^{+}}$ of the Z boson. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $\eta^{\mu^{-}}$ of the Z boson. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $\eta^{\mu^{+}}$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $\eta^{\mu^{-}}$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Products of $\overline{B}^0$ production cross-sections and $\mathcal{B}(\overline{B}^0 \rightarrow J\psi \overline{K}^{*0})$ in bins of $p_\rm{T}$ and $y$ in the 2012 data sample.

Asymmetries $a_{\rm p+d}$ $(\%)$ of $\Lambda_b^0$ and $\overline{\Lambda}_b^0$ in bins of $p_\rm{T}$ for the 2011 and 2012 samples.

Asymmetries $a_{\rm p+d}$ $(\%)$ of $\Lambda_b^0$ and $\overline{\Lambda}_b^0$ in bins of $y$ for the 2011 and 2012 samples.

Inclusive cross-section for $W^+$ and $W^-$ boson production in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic, beam and luminosity.

Ratio of $W^+$ to $W^-$ cross-section in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic and beam.

Lepton charge asymmetry in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical, systematic and beam.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $y_{Z}$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of transverse momentum. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of $\phi^{*}$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients of differential cross-section measurements as a function of lepton $\eta$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Correlation coefficients between differential cross-section measurements as a function $y_{Z}$ and $W^{\pm}$ boson muon $\eta$. The beam energy and luminosity uncertainties, which are fully correlated between cross-section measurements, are excluded.

Lepton charge asymmetry in bins of muon pseudorapidity. The uncertainties are statistical and systematic.

The fitted exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The fitted exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The fitted exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The fitted exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The fitted exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The fitted exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The fitted exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The differential cross section as a function of PHI, the angle between the positron scattering plane and the proton scattering plane for the LRG and the LPS data samples.

The azimuthal asymmetries ALT and ATT as a function of X(NAME=POMERON).

The azimuthal asymmetries ALT and ATT as a function of BETA.

The azimuthal asymmetries ALT and ATT as a function of ABS(T).

The azimuthal asymmetries ALT and ATT as a function of Q**2.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 2.5 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.09 to 0.19 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 3.9 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.09 to 0.19 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 7.1 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.09 to 0.19 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 14 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.09 to 0.19 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 40 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.09 to 0.19 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 2.5 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.19 to 0.55 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 3.9 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.19 to 0.55 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 7.1 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.19 to 0.55 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 14 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.19 to 0.55 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 40 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.19 to 0.55 GeV**2 for M(X) values of 3, 7, 15 and 30 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 2.5 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 3.9 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 7.1 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 14 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LPS data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 40 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 2.5 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 3.5 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 4.5 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 5.5 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 6.5 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 8.5 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 12 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 16 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 22 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 30 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 40 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 50 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 65 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 85 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 110 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 140 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 185 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

The reduced diffractive cross sections obtained from the LRG data as a function of X(NAME=POMERON) for Q**2 = 255 GeV**2 and M(X) values of 3, 6, 11, 19 and 32 GeV.

Differential K0S cross section in DIS events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab). for Q**2 > 25 GeV**2.

Differential K0S cross section in DIS events as a function of Bjorken X. for Q**2 from 5 to 25 GeV**2.

Differential K0S cross section in DIS events as a function of Bjorken X. for Q**2 > 25 GeV**2.

Differential K0S cross section in DIS events as a function of Q**2. for Q**2 > 5 GeV**2.

Differential LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR cross section in DIS events as a function of transverse momentum (lab). for Q**2 from 5 to 25 GeV**2.

Differential LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR cross section in DIS events as a function of transverse momentum (lab). for Q**2 > 25 GeV**2.

Differential LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR cross section in DIS events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab). for Q**2 from 5 to 25 GeV**2.

Differential LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR cross section in DIS events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab). for Q**2 > 25 GeV**2.

Differential LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR cross section in DIS eventsas a function of Bjorken X. for Q**2 from 5 to 25 GeV**2.

Differential LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR cross section in DIS eventsas a function of Bjorken X. for Q**2 > 25 GeV**2.

Differential LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR cross section in DIS events as a function of Q**2. for Q**2 > 5 GeV**2.

Differential K0S cross section in photoproduction events as a function of transverse momentum (lab).

Differential K0S cross section in photoproduction events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab).

Differential K0S cross section in photoproduction events as a function of XOBS(C=GAMMA).

Differential LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR cross section in photoproduction events as a function of transverse momentum (lab).

Differential LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR cross section in photoproduction events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab).

Differential LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR cross section in photoproduction events as a function of XOBS(C=GAMMA).

Asymmetry in LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR production in DIS events as a function of transverse momentum (lab). for Q**2 > 25 GeV**2.

Asymmetry in LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR production in DIS events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab). for Q**2 > 25 GeV**2.

Asymmetry in LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR production in DIS events as a function of Bjorken X. for Q**2 > 25 GeV**2.

Asymmetry in LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR production in DIS events as a function of Q**2. for Q**2 > 25 GeV**2.

Asymmetry in LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR production in photoproduction events as a function of transverse momentum (lab).

Asymmetry in LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR production in photoproduction events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab).

Asymmetry in LAMBDA/LAMBDABAR production in photoproduction events as a function of XOBS(C=GAMMA).

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in DIS events as a function of transverse momentum (lab). for Q**2 from 5 to 25 GeV**2.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in DIS events as a function of transverse momentum (lab). for Q**2 > 25 GeV**2.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in DIS events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab). for Q**2 from 5 to 25 GeV**2.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in DIS events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab). for Q**2 > 25 GeV**2.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in DIS events as a function of Bjorken X. for Q**2 from 5 to 25 GeV**2.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in DIS events as a function of Bjorken X. for Q**2 > 25 GeV**2.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in DIS events as a function of Q**2. for Q**2 > 5 GeV**2.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in DIS events as a function of Q**2. for Bjorken X from 2.0E-5 to 3.0E-4.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in DIS events as a function of Q**2. for Bjorken X from 3.0E-4 to 6.0E-4.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in DIS events as a function of Q**2. for Bjorken X from 6.0E-4 to 1.4E-3.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in DIS events as a function of Q**2. for Bjorken X from 1.4E-3 to 2.0E-2.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in DIS events as a function of Bjorken X. for Q**2 from 5.0 to 9.5 GeV**2.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in DIS events as a function of Bjorken X. for Q**2 from 9.5 to 25.0 GeV**2.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in DIS events as a function of Bjorken X. for Q**2 from 25 to 100 GeV**2.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in DIS events as a function of Bjorken X. for Q**2 from 100 to 500 GeV**2.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in photoproduction events as a function of transverse momentum (lab).

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in photoproduction events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab).

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in photoproduction events as a function of XOBS(C=GAMMA).

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in photoproduction events as a function of transverse momentum (lab). for data from the fireball-enriched sample where the highest energy jet contributes no more than 30% to the total energy.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in photoproduction events as a function of transverse momentum (lab). for data from the fireball-depleted sample where the highest energy jet contributes at least 30% to the total energy.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in photoproduction events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab). for data from the fireball-enriched sample where the highest energy jet contributes no more than 30% to the total energy.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in photoproduction events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab). for data from the fireball-depleted sample where the highest energy jet contributes at least 30% to the total energy.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in photoproduction events as a function of XOBS(C=GAMMA). for data from the fireball-enriched sample where the highest energy jet contributes no more than 30% to the total energy.

LAMBDA/K0S production ratio in photoproduction events as a function of XOBS(C=GAMMA). for data from the fireball-depleted sample where the highest energy jet contributes at least 30% to the total energy.

K0S/Charged particle production ratio in DIS events as a function of transverse momentum (lab). for Q**2 > 25 GeV**2.

K0S/Charged particle production ratio in DIS events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab). for Q**2 > 25 GeV**2.

K0S/Charged particle production ratio in photoproduction events as a function of transverse momentum (lab).

K0S/Charged particle production ratio in photoproduction events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab).

K0S/Charged particle production ratio in photoproduction events as a function of transverse momentum (lab). for data from the fireball-enriched sample where the highest energy jet contributes no more than 30% to the total energy.

K0S/Charged particle production ratio in photoproduction events as a function of transverse momentum (lab). for data from the fireball-depleted sample where the highest energy jet contributes at least 30% to the total energy.

K0S/Charged particle production ratio in photoproduction events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab). for data from the fireball-enriched sample where the highest energy jet contributes no more than 30% to the total energy.

K0S/Charged particle production ratio in photoproduction events as a function of pseudorapidity (lab). for data from the fireball-depleted sample where the highest energy jet contributes at least 30% to the total energy.

No description provided.

The quoted uncertaintis include statistical and systematic components.

Data with tight SPRIME cut.

Data with loose SPRIME cut.

Data with tight SPRIME cut.

Data with tight SPRIME cut.

Forward-Backward Asymmetry with loose SPRIME cuts.

Forward-Backward Asymmetry with tight SPRIME cuts.

Forward-Backward Asymmetry with loose SPRIME cuts.

Forward-Backward Asymmetry with tight SPRIME cuts.

Forward-Backward Asymmetry for tight SPRIME cuts.