List of relative uncertainties of the measured inclusive $t\bar{t}\text{Z}$ cross section from the combined fit. The uncertainties are symmetrised for presentation and grouped into the categories described in the text. The quadratic sum of the individual uncertainties is not equal to the total uncertainty due to correlations introduced by the fit.

The definitions of the trilepton signal regions: for the inclusive measurement, a combination of the regions with pseudo-continuous $b$-tagging 3$\ell$-Z-1$b$4$j$-PCBT and 3$\ell$-Z-2$b$3$j$-PCBT is used, whereas for the differential measurement, only the region 3$\ell$-Z-2$b$3$j$, with a fixed $b$-tagging WP is employed.

The definitions of the trilepton signal regions: for the inclusive measurement, a combination of the regions with pseudo-continuous $b$-tagging 3$\ell$-Z-1$b$4$j$-PCBT and 3$\ell$-Z-2$b$3$j$-PCBT is used, whereas for the differential measurement, only the region 3$\ell$-Z-2$b$3$j$, with a fixed $b$-tagging WP is employed.

The definitions of the four tetralepton signal regions. The regions are defined to target different $b$-jet multiplicities and flavour combinations of the non-Z leptons.

The definitions of the four tetralepton signal regions. The regions are defined to target different $b$-jet multiplicities and flavour combinations of the non-Z leptons.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|$ in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel. The uncertainty is decomposed into four components which are the signal modelling uncertainty, the background modelling uncertainty, the experimental uncertainty, and the data statistical uncertainty.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised parton-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the absolute particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}$ of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of the $Z$ boson in the 3$\ell$+4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{l \textrm{non-}Z}$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta y (Z, t_{\textrm{lep}})|/\pi$ in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 3$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (l_{t}^{+}, l_{\bar{t}}^{-})|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $|\Delta \phi (t\bar{t}, Z)|/\pi$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the $p_{\textrm{T}}^{t\bar{t}}$ in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel.

The total correlation matrix of the normalised particle-level differential cross-section measured in the fiducial phase-space as a function of the number of jets in the 4$\ell$ channel.

Out projection of raw 3D LCMS KS KS correlation function for 1.0 < kT < 1.5 GeV/c bin

Side projection of raw 3D LCMS KS KS correlation function for 1.0 < kT < 1.5 GeV/c bin

Long projection of raw 3D LCMS KS KS correlation function for 1.0 < kT < 1.5 GeV/c bin

Rout vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-10%

Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-10%

Rlong vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-10%

Rout vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 10-30%

Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 10-30%

Rlong vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 10-30%

Rout vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 30-50%

Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 30-50%

Rlong vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 30-50%

Rout vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-5%

Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-5%

Rlong vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-5%

Ratio Rout/Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-5%

Ratio Rout/Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-10%

Ratio Rout/Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 10-30%

Ratio Rout/Rside vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 30-50%

Rlong^2 vs. mT for PI+- PI+- for centrality 0-5%

C(k*)/(linear baseline fit) for K0s K+ and all kT bin

C(k*)/(linear baseline fit) for K0s K+ and kT < 0.675 GeV/c bin

C(k*)/(linear baseline fit) for K0s K+ and kT > 0.675 GeV/c bin

C(k*)/(linear baseline fit) for K0s K- and all kT bin

C(k*)/(linear baseline fit) for K0s K- and kT < 0.675 GeV/c bin

C(k*)/(linear baseline fit) for K0s K- and kT > 0.675 GeV/c bin

R vs. kT for K0s K- with Achasov1 parameters

lambda vs. kT for K0s K- with Achasov1 parameters

R vs. kT for K0s K+- with Achasov1 parameters and linear fit

lambda vs. kT for K0s K+- with Achasov1 parameters and linear fit

Definition of the fiducial phase space.

The seven input variables to the NN ordered by their discriminating power. The jet that is not $b$-tagged is referred to as $\textit{untagged}~$jet.

The seven input variables to the NN ordered by their discriminating power. The jet that is not $b$-tagged is referred to as $\textit{untagged}~$jet.

Event yields for the different processes estimated with the fit to the $O_\mathrm{NN}$ distribution compared to the numbers of observed events. Only the statistical uncertainties are quoted. The $Z,VV+\mathrm{jets}$ contributions and the multijet background are fixed in the fit; therefore no uncertainty is quoted for these processes.

Event yields for the different processes estimated with the fit to the $O_\mathrm{NN}$ distribution compared to the numbers of observed events. Only the statistical uncertainties are quoted. The $Z,VV+\mathrm{jets}$ contributions and the multijet background are fixed in the fit; therefore no uncertainty is quoted for these processes.

Detailed list of the contribution from each source of uncertainty to the total uncertainty in the measured values of $\sigma_{\mathrm{fid}}(tq)$ and $\sigma_{\mathrm{fid}}(\bar tq)$. The estimation of the systematic uncertainties has a statistical uncertainty of $0.3\%$. Uncertainties contributing less than $0.5\%$ are marked with ‘<0.5’.

Detailed list of the contribution from each source of uncertainty to the total uncertainty in the measured values of $\sigma_{\mathrm{fid}}(tq)$ and $\sigma_{\mathrm{fid}}(\bar tq)$. The estimation of the systematic uncertainties has a statistical uncertainty of $0.3\%$. Uncertainties contributing less than $0.5\%$ are marked with ‘<0.5’.

Significant contributions to the total relative uncertainty in the measured value of $R_{t}$. The estimation of the systematic uncertainties has a statistical uncertainty of $0.3~\%$. Uncertainties contributing less than $0.5~\%$ are not shown.

Significant contributions to the total relative uncertainty in the measured value of $R_{t}$. The estimation of the systematic uncertainties has a statistical uncertainty of $0.3~\%$. Uncertainties contributing less than $0.5~\%$ are not shown.

Slopes $a$ of the mass dependence of the measured cross$-$sections.

Slopes $a$ of the mass dependence of the measured cross$-$sections.

Predicted (post-fit) and observed event yields for the signal region (SR), after the requirement on the neural network discriminant, $O_{\mathrm{NN}}~>~0.8$. The multijet background prediction is obtained from the fit to the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ distribution described in Section 6, while all the other predictions and uncertainties are derived from the total cross$-$section measurement. In some cases there is no uncertainty quoted. In these cases the uncertainty is < 0.5.

Predicted (post-fit) and observed event yields for the signal region (SR), after the requirement on the neural network discriminant, $O_{\mathrm{NN}}~>~0.8$. The multijet background prediction is obtained from the fit to the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ distribution described in Section 6, while all the other predictions and uncertainties are derived from the total cross$-$section measurement. In some cases there is no uncertainty quoted. In these cases the uncertainty is < 0.5.

Predicted (post-fit) and observed event yields for the signal region (SR), after the requirement on the second neural network discriminant, $O_{\mathrm{NN2}}~>~0.8$. The multijet background prediction is obtained from the fit to the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ distribution described in Section 6, while all the other predictions and uncertainties are derived from the total cross$-$section measurement. In some cases there is no uncertainty quoted. In these cases the uncertainty is < 0.5.

Predicted (post-fit) and observed event yields for the signal region (SR), after the requirement on the second neural network discriminant, $O_{\mathrm{NN2}}~>~0.8$. The multijet background prediction is obtained from the fit to the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ distribution described in Section 6, while all the other predictions and uncertainties are derived from the total cross$-$section measurement. In some cases there is no uncertainty quoted. In these cases the uncertainty is < 0.5.

Migration matrix for $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at the particle level. The pseudo top quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.

Migration matrix for $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at the particle level. The pseudo top quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.

Migration matrix for $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at the parton level. The parton-level quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.

Migration matrix for $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at the parton level. The parton-level quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.

Migration matrix for $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at the particle level. The pseudo top quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.

Migration matrix for $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at the particle level. The pseudo top quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.

Migration matrix for $|y(t)|$ at the parton level. The parton-level quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.

Migration matrix for $|y(t)|$ at the parton level. The parton-level quark is shown on the $y$-axis and the reconstructed variable is shown on the $x$-axis.

Uncertainties in the normalisations of the different backgrounds for all processes, as derived from the total cross-section measurement.

Uncertainties in the normalisations of the different backgrounds for all processes, as derived from the total cross-section measurement.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level.

Absolute and normalised unfolded differential $\bar tq$ production cross$-$section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level.

Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $tq$ events(at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $ \bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $ \bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the particle level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ for $tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ for $ \bar tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ for $tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ for $ \bar tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ for $tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the absolute differential cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ for $tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Statistical correlation matrix for the normalised differential cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ for $\bar tq$ events (at the parton level). It includes the statistical uncertainty due to the number of data events and MC statistics.

Fiducial acceptance $A_{\mathrm{fid}}$ for different $t$-channel single top-quark MC samples. $^{\mathrm{(a)}}$ Calculation taken from AcerMC $+$ $\mathrm{P{\scriptsize YTHIA}6}$. $^{\mathrm{(b)}}$ Calculation taken from $\mathrm{P{\scriptsize OWHEG}}$-$\mathrm{B{\scriptsize OX}}$ $+$ $\mathrm{P{\scriptsize YTHIA}6}$.

Fiducial acceptance $A_{\mathrm{fid}}$ for different $t$-channel single top-antiquark MC samples. $^{\mathrm{(a)}}$ Calculation taken from AcerMC $+$ $\mathrm{P{\scriptsize YTHIA}6}$. $^{\mathrm{(b)}}$ Calculation taken from $\mathrm{P{\scriptsize OWHEG}}$-$\mathrm{B{\scriptsize OX}}$ $+$ $\mathrm{P{\scriptsize YTHIA}6}$.

Uncertainties for the absolute differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([0,35,50,75,100,150,200,300] GeV) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the normalised differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([0,35,50,75,100,150,200,300] GeV) in percent of $\left( \dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the absolute differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([0,35,50,75,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$.

Uncertainties for the normalised differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([0,35,50,75,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\left( \dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$.

Uncertainties for the absolute differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0,0.15,0.3,0.45,0.7,1.0,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the normalised differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0,0.15,0.3,0.45,0.7,1.0,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the absolute differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0,0.15,0.3,0.45,0.7,1.0,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the normalised differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0,0.15,0.3,0.45,0.7,1.0,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{t\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the absolute differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([30,45,60,75,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the normalised differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([30,45,60,75,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the absolute differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([30,45,60,75,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the normalised differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})$ at particle level per bin ([30,45,60,75,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the absolute differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0.0, 1.2, 1.7, 2.2, 2.7, 3.3, 4.5]) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the normalised differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0.0, 1.2, 1.7, 2.2, 2.7, 3.3, 4.5]) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the absolute differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0.0, 1.2, 1.7, 2.2, 2.7, 3.3, 4.5]) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the normalised differential $\bar tq$ cross-section as a function of $|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|$ at particle level per bin ([0.0, 1.2, 1.7, 2.2, 2.7, 3.3, 4.5]) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(\hat{j\hspace{-0.2mm}})|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the absolute differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level per bin ([0,50,100,150,200,300] GeV) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$.

Uncertainties for the normalised differential $tq$ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level per bin ([0,50,100,150,200,300] GeV) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the absolute differential $\bar tq $ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level per bin ([0,50,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$.

Uncertainties for the normalised differential $\bar tq $ cross-section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ at parton level per bin ([0,50,100,150,300] GeV) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$.

Uncertainties for the absolute differential $ tq $ cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level per bin ([0,0.3,0.7,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the normalised differential $ tq $ cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level per bin ([0,0.3,0.7,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

Uncertainties for the absolute differential $ \bar tq $ cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level per bin ([0,0.3,0.7,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$.

Uncertainties for the normalised differential $ \bar tq $ cross-section as a function of $|y(t)|$ at parton level per bin ([0,0.3,0.7,1.3,2.2]) in percent of $\left(\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\right)\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma(\bar tq)}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$. If the uncertainty reported in the paper is "0.0" for both the $\textit{plus}$ and $\textit{minus}$ variation, the value "+0.01" is assigned to the $\textit{plus}$ variation for technical reasons.

The azimuthal dependence of $R_{out}^{2}$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20-30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $R_{side}^{2}$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $R_{side}^{2}$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $R_{side}^{2}$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $R_{side}^{2}$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $R_{long}^{2}$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $R_{long}^{2}$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $R_{long}^{2}$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $R_{long}^{2}$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $\lambda$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $\lambda$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $\lambda$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $\lambda$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $R_{os}^{2}$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $R_{os}^{2}$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $R_{os}^{2}$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The azimuthal dependence of $R_{os}^{2}$ as a function of $\Delta\varphi=\varphi_{\mathrm{pair}}-\Psi_{\mathrm EP,2}$ for the centrality 20--30% and different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{out,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{out,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{out,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{out,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{side,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{side,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{side,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{side,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{long,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{long,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{long,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{long,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{os,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{os,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{os,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

The average radii $R_{os,0}^{2}$ as a function of centrality for different $k_{\mathrm{T}}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm out,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm out,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm out,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm out,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm side,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm side,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm side,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm side,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm long,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm long,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm long,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm long,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm long,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm long,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm long,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm long,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm os,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm os,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm os,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

Amplitudes of the relative radius oscillations~$R^{2}_{\mathrm os,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ versus centrality for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges.

An estimate of freeze-out eccentricity $2 R^{2}_{\mathrm side,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges vs. initial state eccentricity from Monte Carlo Glauber model for six centrality ranges, 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40%, and 40-50%.

An estimate of freeze-out eccentricity $2 R^{2}_{\mathrm side,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges vs. initial state eccentricity from Monte Carlo Glauber model for six centrality ranges, 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40%, and 40-50%.

An estimate of freeze-out eccentricity $2 R^{2}_{\mathrm side,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges vs. initial state eccentricity from Monte Carlo Glauber model for six centrality ranges, 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40%, and 40-50%.

An estimate of freeze-out eccentricity $2 R^{2}_{\mathrm side,2}/R^{2}_{\mathrm side,0}$ for different $k_{\mathrm T}$ ranges vs. initial state eccentricity from Monte Carlo Glauber model for six centrality ranges, 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40%, and 40-50%.

$\Delta\eta$ integrated projections of correlation functions for (a) $\pi^+\pi^-$, (b) $\rm K^+K^-$, (c) $\mathrm{p\overline{p}}$ pairs.

$\Delta\eta$ integrated projections of correlation functions for combined pairs of (a) $\pi^+\pi^+ + \pi^-\pi^-$, (b) $\rm K^+K^+ + K^-K^-$, (c) $\mathrm{pp} + \rm \overline{p}\overline{p}$ pairs.

$\Delta\eta$ integrated projections of correlation functions for (a) $\Lambda\Lambda+\overline{\Lambda}\overline{\Lambda}$, (b)$\Lambda\overline{\Lambda}$ pairs.

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ ($-0.96 < y_{\rm cms} < 0.04$) and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 0.3~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp (p-Pb) collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$ ($\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02~{\rm TeV}$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ ($-0.96 < y_{\rm cms} < 0.04$) and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 0.3~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp (p-Pb) collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$ ($\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02~{\rm TeV}$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $3 < p_{\rm T} < 5~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$.

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ ($-0.96 < y_{\rm cms} < 0.04$) and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp (p-Pb) collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$ ($\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02~{\rm TeV}$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ ($-0.96 < y_{\rm cms} < 0.04$) and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp (p-Pb) collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$ ($\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02~{\rm TeV}$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $3 < p_{\rm T} < 5~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$.

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ ($-0.96 < y_{\rm cms} < 0.04$) and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp (p-Pb) collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$ ($\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02~{\rm TeV}$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ ($-0.96 < y_{\rm cms} < 0.04$) and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp (p-Pb) collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$ ($\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02~{\rm TeV}$).

Comparison of the azimuthal-correlation distributions of D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8$ GeV/$c$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 0.3$ GeV/$c$, in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV. Rapidity range for the D mesons are $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ in pp, $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$ in p-Pb. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$. The azimuthal-correlation distributions are reported in the range $0 < \Delta\varphi < \pi$.

Comparison of the azimuthal-correlation distributions of D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16$ GeV/$c$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 0.3$ GeV/$c$, in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV. Rapidity range for the D mesons are $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ in pp, $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$ in p-Pb. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$. The azimuthal-correlation distributions are reported in the range $0 < \Delta\varphi < \pi$.

Comparison of the azimuthal-correlation distributions of D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8$ GeV/$c$ and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1$ GeV/$c$, in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV. Rapidity range for the D mesons are $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ in pp, $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$ in p-Pb. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$. The azimuthal-correlation distributions are reported in the range $0 < \Delta\varphi < \pi$.

Comparison of the azimuthal-correlation distributions of D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16$ GeV/$c$ and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1$ GeV/$c$, in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV. Rapidity range for the D mesons are $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ in pp, $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$ in p-Pb. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$. The azimuthal-correlation distributions are reported in the range $0 < \Delta\varphi < \pi$.

Comparison of the azimuthal-correlation distributions of D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8$ GeV/$c$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1$ GeV/$c$, in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV. Rapidity range for the D mesons are $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ in pp, $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$ in p-Pb. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$. The azimuthal-correlation distributions are reported in the range $0 < \Delta\varphi < \pi$.

Comparison of the azimuthal-correlation distributions of D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16$ GeV/$c$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1$ GeV/$c$, in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV and p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV. Rapidity range for the D mesons are $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ in pp, $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$ in p-Pb. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$. The azimuthal-correlation distributions are reported in the range $0 < \Delta\varphi < \pi$.

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $3 < p_{\rm T} < 5~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 0.3~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 0.3~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 0.3~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $3 < p_{\rm T} < 5~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $3 < p_{\rm T} < 5~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $5 < p_{\rm T} < 8~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Azimuthal correlation of D mesons (${\rm D}^{0}$, ${\rm D}^{+}$, ${\rm D}^{*+}$ average) with $8 < p_{\rm T} < 16~{\rm GeV}/c$ and $|y_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$ and charged particles with $p_{\rm T} > 1~{\rm GeV}/c$ for $|\Delta\eta| = |\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$ measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7~{\rm TeV}$. The points are shown after the subtraction of the baseline of the distribution, which is defined as the physical minimum of the distribution and estimated from the weighted average of the points in the transverse region ($\pi/4 < |\Delta\varphi| < \pi/2$).

Near-side-peak associated yield values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 0.3$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak associated yield values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak associated yield values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak width values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 0.3$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak width values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak width values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Baseline values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 0.3$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Baseline values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Baseline values measured in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $|y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak associated yield values measured in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 0.3$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak associated yield values measured in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak associated yield values measured in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak width values measured in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 0.3$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak width values measured in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}| < 1$.

Near-side-peak width values measured in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV, for correlations of D mesons (D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, D$^{*+}$ average) and charged particles, as a function of the D-meson $p_{\rm T}$, for associated track $p_{\rm T} > 1$ GeV/$c$. Rapidity range for the D mesons is $-0.96 < y^{\rm D}_{\rm cms} < 0.04$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta| =|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D}|< 1$.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70To80%.

$\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\eta}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

$\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Relative decrease of $\sigma_{\Delta\varphi}$ as a function of the multiplicity class.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 60_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 60_80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0To10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30To40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70To80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 50_60%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0_5%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30_40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 50_60%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\eta$ 70-80%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 0-10%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 30-40%.

Balance function in $\Delta\varphi$ 70-80%.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

Sigma as function of the multiplicity class for $p_{\rm{T}}$ low, intermediate, and high.

$\lambda_{{\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}}+\lambda_{{\rm \overline{p}} \overline{\Lambda}}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}$.

$\lambda_{{\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}}+\lambda_{{\rm \overline{p}} \overline{\Lambda}}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}$.

$\lambda_{{\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}}+\lambda_{{\rm \overline{p}} \overline{\Lambda}}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}$.

$\lambda_{{\rm p}{\rm {p}}}+\lambda_{{\rm {p}}\Lambda}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm {p}}{\rm {p}}$.

$\lambda_{{\rm p}{\rm {p}}}+\lambda_{{\rm {p}}\Lambda}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm {p}}{\rm {p}}$.

$\lambda_{{\rm p}{\rm {p}}}+\lambda_{{\rm {p}}\Lambda}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm {p}}{\rm {p}}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{\pm}}{\rm K^{\pm}}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{\pm}}{\rm K^{\pm}}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{\pm}}{\rm K^{\pm}}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for $\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\pm}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for $\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\pm}$.

$\lambda$ parameter vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for $\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\pm}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm \overline{p}}{\rm \overline{p}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm {p}}{\rm {p}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm {p}}{\rm {p}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm {p}}{\rm {p}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{ 0}_S}{\rm K^{ 0}_S}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{\pm}}{\rm K^{\pm}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{\pm}}{\rm K^{\pm}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for ${\rm K^{\pm}}{\rm K^{\pm}}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for $\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\pm}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for $\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\pm}$.

$R_{\rm inv}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for $\pi^{\pm}\pi^{\pm}$.