Bosted, P.E.
FORM-FACTOR
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 6 of 6 results

Determination of the Charged Pion Form Factor at Q2=1.60 and 2.45 (GeV/c)2

The Jefferson Lab F(pi)-2 collaboration Horn, T. ; Aniol, K. ; Arrington, J. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 97 (2006) 192001, 2006.
Inspire Record 721062 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.31560

The H(e,e'pi+)n cross section was measured at four-momentum transfers of Q2=1.60 and 2.45 GeV2 at an invariant mass of the photon nucleon system of W=2.22 GeV. The charged pion form factor (F_pi) was extracted from the data by comparing the separated longitudinal pion electroproduction cross section to a Regge model prediction in which F_pi is a free parameter. The results indicate that the pion form factor deviates from the charge-radius constrained monopole form at these values of Q2 by one sigma, but is still far from its perturbative Quantum Chromo-Dynamics prediction.

3 data tables
Table 1

Separated cross sections at mean Q**2 of 1.60 GeV**2.

Table 2

Separated cross sections at mean Q**2 of 2.45 GeV**2.

Table 3

Extracted values of the charged pion form-factor. Errors are the statistical and experimental systematics combined in quadrature.


rivet Analysis
Measurement of the eta and eta' transition form factors at q**2 = 112-GeV**2.

The BaBar collaboration Aubert, Bernard ; Barate, R. ; Bona, M. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 74 (2006) 012002, 2006.
Inspire Record 716277 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.22085

We report a study of the processes e+e- -> eta gamma and e+e- -> etaprime gamma at a center-of-mass energy of 10.58 GeV, using a 232 fb^-1 data sample collected with the BABAR detector at the PEP-II collider at SLAC. We observe 20+6-5 eta gamma and 50+8-7 etaprime gamma events over small backgrounds, and measure the cross sections sigma(e+e- -> eta gamma) =4.5+1.2-1.1(stat)+-0.3(sys) fb and sigma(e+e- -> etaprime gamma)=5.4+-0.8(stat)+-0.3(sys) fb. The corresponding transition form factors at q^2 = 112 GeV^2 are q^2|F_eta(q^2)|=0.229+-0.030+-0.008 GeV, and q^2|F_etaprime(q^2)|=0.251+-0.019+-0.008 GeV, respectively.

3 data tables
Table 1

Measured cross sections.

Table 2

Undressed cross sections calculated by applying a 7.5 +- 0.2 PCT correction for vacuum polarization.

Table 3

Transition form factors at Q**2 = 112 GeV**2.


Measurements of the proton elastic form-factors for 1-GeV/c**2 <= Q**2 <= 3-GeV/C**2 at SLAC

Walker, R.C. ; Filippone, B. ; Jourdan, J. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 49 (1994) 5671-5689, 1994.
Inspire Record 360764 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.22469

We report measurements of the proton form factors GEp and GMp extracted from elastic scattering in the range 1≤Q2≤3 (GeV/c)2 with total uncertainties < 15% in GEp and < 3% in GMp. Comparisons are made to theoretical models, including those based on perturbative QCD, vector-meson dominance, QCD sum rules, and diquark constituents in the proton. The results for GEp are somewhat larger than indicated by most theoretical parametrizations, and the ratios of the Pauli and Dirac form factors Q2(F2pF1p) are lower in value and demonstrate a weaker Q2 dependence than those predictions. A global extraction of the elastic form factors from several experiments in the range 0.1 0.1<Q2<10 (GeV/c)2 is also presented.

6 data tables
Table 1

Point-to-point systematic uncertainty is 0.5%, overall normailzation uncertainty is 1.9%.

Table 2

Point-to-point systematic uncertainty is 0.5%, overall normailzation uncertainty is 1.9%.

Table 3

Point-to-point systematic uncertainty is 0.5%, overall normailzation uncertainty is 1.9%.

More…

Measurements of the electric and magnetic form-factors of the neutron from Q**2 = 1.75-GeV/c**2 to 4-GeV/c**2

Lung, A. ; Stuart, L.M. ; Bosted, Peter E. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 70 (1993) 718-721, 1993.
Inspire Record 342252 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.19739

Quasielastic e-d cross sections have been measured at forward and backward angles. Rosenbluth separations were done to obtain RL and RT at Q2=1.75, 2.50, 3.25, and 4.00 (GeV/c)2. The neutron form factors GEn and GMn have been extracted using a nonrelativistic model. The sensitivity to deuteron wave function, relativistic corrections, and models of the inelastic background are reported. The results for GMn are consistent with the dipole form, while GEn is consistent with zero. Comparisons are made to theoretical models based on vector meson dominance, perturbative QCD, and QCD sum rules, as well as constituent quarks.

2 data tables
Table 1

Magnetic form factors.

Table 2

Electric form factors.


Measurements of the electric and magnetic form-factors of the proton from Q**2 = 1.75-GeV/c**2 to 8.83-GeV/c**2

Bosted, Peter E. ; Clogher, L. ; Lung, A. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 68 (1992) 3841-3844, 1992.
Inspire Record 332962 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.19849

The proton elastic electric and magnetic form factors, GEp(Q2) and GMp(Q2), have been separately measured in the range Q2=1.75 to 8.83 (GeV/c)2, more than doubling the Q2 range of previous data. Scaled by the dipole fit, GD(Q2), the results for GMp(Q2)/μpGD(Q2) decrease smoothly from 1.05 to 0.91, while GEp(Q2)/GD(Q2) is consistent with unity. Comparisons are made to QCD sum rule, diquark, constitutent quark, and vector meson dominance models, none of which agree with all of the new data. The ratio Q2F2/F1 approaches a constant value for Q2>3 (GeV/c)2.

2 data tables
Table 1

Magnetic form factors.

Table 2

Electric form factors.


Measurement of Elastic electron - Neutron Cross-Sections Up to Q**2 = 10-(GeV/c)**2

Rock, Stephen ; Arnold, R.G. ; Bosted, Peter E. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 49 (1982) 1139, 1982.
Inspire Record 179135 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20575

The elastic electron-neutron cross section has been measured at four-momentum transfers squared (Q2) of 2.5, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.0 (GeV/c)2 with use of a deuterium target and detection of the scattered electrons at 10°. The ratio of neutron to proton elastic cross sections decreases with Q2. At high Q2 this trend is inconsistent with the dipole law, form-factor scaling, and many vector dominance models, although it is consistent with some parton models.

2 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.