Elastic electron proton scattering has been used to check the validity of the dipole fit of the proton form factors at momentum transfer between 0.05 and 0.30 (GeV/ c ) 2 . The general behaviour of the cross sections is in agreement with previous measurements and is close to the dipole predictions but there is the suggestion of some small amplitude deviations. It is speculated that these deviations may be related to similar effects in the proton formfactor derived from the ISR pp elastic scattering data via a Chou-Yang model.
D(SIG(N=DIPOLE))/D(OMEGA) is cross-section derived in the assumption that both the magnetic and electric form - factors of the proton can be expressed by the dipole formula G(q**2) = 1/(1 + q**2/0.71)**2. Data are read from graph by BVP.
D(SIG(N=DIPOLE))/D(OMEGA) is cross-section derived in the assumption that both the magnetic and electric form - factors of the proton can be expressed by the dipole formula G(q**2) = 1/(1 + q**2/0.71)**2. Data are read from graph by BVP.
Results of fit of the combined data samples of Table 1 and Table 2. Data points was fitted by formula A + B*q**2 + C*sin(OMEGA*q**2 + PHI).
Production and decay characteristics of electroproduced rho mesons were studied in the final state epπ + π − .
No description provided.
We have extracted the strong interaction form factors from K o e3 and K o μ3 data of our previously reported K o L experiment in a manner which does not assume an explicit q 2 = ( p K − p π ) 2 dependence. We present the unparameterized form factors ƒ + (q 2 ) from the K o L → πeν and K o L → πμν modes and ƒ o (q 2 ) and ξ ( q 2 ) from the K o L → πμν data. A comparison of these unparameterized results is made with the results of the Dalitz plot analyses.
The conventional form factor f+ is studied.
The twofold differential cross section for the inelastic scattering of electrons on protons wa was measured as a function of the scattered electron energy for an electron scattering angle of 12°. The kinematic region covered in this experiment was 0.3 (GeV/ c ) 2 < q 2 < 1.0 (GeV/ c ) 2 and W < 2.9 GeV. The Bloom-Gilman as well as the constant scattering angle sum rule of Rittenberg and Rubinstein were tested.
Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (3.7 TO 5////UNCERTAINTIES IN TARGET DENSITY, TARGET DIAMETER, SOLID ANGLE, E- SCATTERING ANGLE, INCIDENT E- ENERGY, DEAD TIME CORRECTIONS, CONSTANT OF FARADAY-CUP INTEGRATOR EFFICIENCY OF SPARK CHAMBERS, RADIATIVE CORRECTIONS).
Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (3.7 TO 5////UNCERTAINTIES IN TARGET DENSITY, TARGET DIAMETER, SOLID ANGLE, E- SCATTERING ANGLE, INCIDENT E- ENERGY, DEAD TIME CORRECTIONS, CONSTANT OF FARADAY-CUP INTEGRATOR EFFICIENCY OF SPARK CHAMBERS, RADIATIVE CORRECTIONS).
Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (3.7 TO 5////UNCERTAINTIES IN TARGET DENSITY, TARGET DIAMETER, SOLID ANGLE, E- SCATTERING ANGLE, INCIDENT E- ENERGY, DEAD TIME CORRECTIONS, CONSTANT OF FARADAY-CUP INTEGRATOR EFFICIENCY OF SPARK CHAMBERS, RADIATIVE CORRECTIONS).
Electron-proton elastic-scattering cross sections have been measured at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center for four-momentum transfers squared q 2 from 1.0 to 25.0 (GeVc)2. The electric (GEp) and magnetic (GMp) form factors of the proton were not separated, since angular distributions were not measured at each q 2. However, values for GMp were derived assuming various relations between GEp and GMp. Several theoretical models for the behavior of the proton magnetic form factor at high values of q 2 are compared with the data.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
Final states π − Σ + , π + Σ − , π o Λ and ηΛ were studied for K − p reactions at 3.95 GeV/ c . Cross sections, angular distributions and polarizations are presented. Data for π − Σ + and π o Λ production are compared to the line-reversed πp reactions at the same beam momentum. Baryon-exchange peaks are presented for the Σ + π − , Σ − π + and Λπ o final states.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
We report on a measurement for the branching-ratio X 0 → 2γ X 0 ar all. Our result is X 0 → 2γ X 0 → all = (2.9 ± 0.9)% .
BY COMPARISON WITH THE KNOWN ETA PRODUCTION CROSS SECTION.
Differential cross sections for electrons scattered inelastically from hydrogen have been measured at 18°, 26°, and 34°. The range of incident energy was 4.5 to 18 GeV, and the range of four-momentum transfer squared was 1.5 to 21 (GeVc)2. With the use of these data in conjunction with previously measured data at 6° and 10°, the contributions from the longitudinal and transverse components of the exchanged photon have been separately determined. The values of the ratio of the photoabsorption cross sections σSσT are found to lie in the range 0 to 0.5. The question of scaling of 2MpW1 and νW2 as a function of ω is discussed, and scaling is verified for a large kinematic range. Also, a new scaling variable which reduces to ω in the Bjorken limit is introduced which extends the scaling region. The behavior of σT and σS is also discussed as a function of ν and q2. Various weighted sum rules of νW2 are evaluated.
Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (0. TO 2.////DUE TO PION CONTAMINATION).
Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (0. TO 2.////DUE TO PION CONTAMINATION).
Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (0. TO 2.////DUE TO PION CONTAMINATION).
Cross sections for π − p→n π o at 5.9, 10.1 and 13.8 GeV/ c incident momentum are presented in the angular region from 180 o to u , the crossed four-momentum transfer squared, of −2(GeV) 2 and the energy dependence is discussed. The cross section for π − p→n η o integrated over the same angular region at 5.9 GeV/ c is also presented.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
Electron-proton elastic scattering cross sections have been measured at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center at four-momentum transfers squared (q 2 ) of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5and 3.75 (GeV/ c ) 2 . The angular distributions at q 2 = 2.5 and 3.75 (GeV/ c ) 2 are sufficient to provide values of the ratio G E / G M independent of the results from other laboratories. Our results are compatible with scaling, G E (q 2 ) = G M (q 2 )/ μ , within the experimental errors.
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.