Sample correlations in $\Delta\phi$ ($|\Delta\eta|<$ 1.78) for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The data are averaged between positive and negative $\Delta\phi$ and reflected in the plot.

Background subtracted sample correlations for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ on the near-side for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The dependence of the jet-like correlation is shown as a function of $\Delta\eta$ ($|\Delta\phi|<$ 0.78). The data are averaged between positive and negative $\Delta\eta$.

Background subtracted sample correlations for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ on the near-side for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The dependence of the jet-like correlation is shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ ($|\Delta\eta|<$ 1.78). The data are averaged between positive and negative $\Delta\phi$.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $p_T^{\mathrm{trigger}}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $p_T^{\mathrm{associated}}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu and 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu, 0-12% Au+Au and 40-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{trigger}}$ for 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{associated}}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{trigger}}$ for 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{associated}}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of PT.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of pseudorapidity.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of pseudorapidity.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of pseudorapidity.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of pseudorapidity.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of PT.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of PT.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of PT.

Differential inclusive charged hadron production cross section as a function of PT.

The cross section for tau+ tau- production corrected to the simple kinematic acceptance region defined by N = M(P=3_4)**2/S > 0.01. Statistical errors onlyare shown. Also given is the cross section value corrected for the beam energy spread to correspond to the physical cross section at the central value of SQRT(S).

The forward-backward charge asymmetry in E+ E- --> MU+ MU- production corrected to the simple kinematic acceptance region ABS(COS(THETA(P=5))) < 0.95 and THETA(C=ACOL) < 15 degrees, and the energy of each fermion required to be greaterthan 6 GeV. Statistical errors only are shown. Also given are the asymmetries a fter correction for the beam energy spread to correspond to the physical asymmetry at the central value of SQRT(S).

The forward-backward charge asymmetry in E+ E- --> TAU+ TAU- production corrected to the simple kinematic acceptance region ABS(COS(THETA(P=5))) < 0.90 andTHETA(C=ACOL) < 15 degrees, and the energy of each fermion required to be great er than 6 GeV. Statistical errors only are shown. Also given are the asymmetriesafter correction for the beam energy spread to correspond to the physical asymm etry at the central value of SQRT(S).

The forward-backward charge asymmetry in E+ E- --> E+ E- production corrected to the simple kinematic acceptance region ABS(COS(THETA(P=5))) < 0.70 and THETA(C=ACOL) < 10 degrees, and the energy of each fermion required to be greater than 6 GeV. Statistical errors only are shown. Also given are the asymmetries after correction for the beam energy spread to correspond to the physical asymmetryat the central value of SQRT(S).

Results for ALPHAS from fits of the ln R-matching predictions for the fractional 2-jet rate observable (D2), and the mean jet multiplicities (N) for the Durham and Cambridge schemes. The errors shown are total errors and contain all the statistics and systematics.

Results for ALPHAS at the Z0 mass from fits of the O(alphas**2) predicitonsfor the energy evolution of the mean 2-jet cross section <Y23> for the DURHAM a nd JADE schemes. The errors shown are total errors and contain all the statistics and systematics.

Results for ALPHAS at the Z0 mass from fits of the O(alphas**2) predicitonsfor the 3-jet fractions (R3) for the JADE, DURHAM and CAMBRIDGE schemes. The errors shown are total errors and contain all the statistics and systematics.

N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets define using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.

Mean value of the observable Ynm (the value of YCUT at the boundary betweenn and (n+1=m) jets) as a function of the c.m. energy. Data from JADE and OPAL collaborations. Jets defined using the JADE/E0 alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Differential distributions in Ynm (the minimum YCUT for the separation inton and m(=n+1) jets). ) from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

Mean value of the observable Ynm (the value of YCUT at the boundary betweenn and (n+1=m) jets) as a function of the c.m. energy. Data from JADE and OPAL collaborations. Jets defined using the DURHAM alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Differential N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Differential N-Jet rates from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Differential N-Jet rates from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

Mean jet multiplicity as a function of YCUT from the OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets defined using the CAMBRIDGE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 35 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from JADE collaboration at c.m. energy 44 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 91 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 133 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 161 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 172 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 183 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.

N-Jet rates from OPAL collaboration at c.m. energy 189 GeV. Jets define using the CONE alogrithm.