Botterill, D.R.
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 10 of 804 results

Date

Limit on the Decay D0 $\to e^\pm \mu^\mp$

Riles, Keith ; Dorfan, J. ; Abrams, G.S. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 35 (1987) 2914, 1987.
Inspire Record 236093 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.23380

We have searched for the lepton-flavor-violating decay D0→e±μ∓ in 204 pb−1 of e+e− annihilation data at Ec.m.=29 GeV from the Mark II detector. No candidates were found; we estimate an upper limit on the cross section times branching ratio of σ(e+e−→D0,D¯0; inclusive)B(D0→e±μ∓)<0.35 pb at the 90% confidence level. Simple assumptions yield the rough limit B(D0→e±μ∓)<2.1×10−3. AE.

1 data table
Table 1

No description provided.


Measurement of the Structure Functions F2 and Xf3 and Comparison With {QCD} Predictions Including Kinematical and Dynamical Higher Twist Effects

The BEBC WA59 collaboration Varvell, K. ; Cooper-Sarkar, A.M. ; Parker, M.A. ; et al.
Z.Phys.C 36 (1987) 1, 1987.
Inspire Record 245094 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.15775

The isoscalar nucleon structure functionsF2(x, Q2) andxF3(x, Q2) are measured in the range 0

9 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

Version 2
rivet Analysis
Production of Strange Baryons in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilations at 29-{GeV}

Abachi, S. ; Baringer, Philip S. ; Bylsma, B.G. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 58 (1987) 2627, 1987.
Inspire Record 246162 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20154

The production of strange baryons Σ± (1385) and Ξ− has been observed in e+e− annihilations at 29 GeV center-of-mass energy, by use of data obtained with the High Resolution Spectrometer at the SLAC storage ring PEP. The total mean multiplicities are measured to be 〈nΣ±(1385)〉=0.033±0.006±0.005 and &〉=0.016±0.004 ±0.004 per hadronic event. The results are in good agreement with the Lund string model.

4 data tables
Table 1

Lund model extrapolation to full x range.

Table 2

Lund model extrapolation to full x range.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

rivet Analysis
UA5: A general study of proton-antiproton physics at s**(1/2) = 546-GeV

The UA5 collaboration Alner, G.J. ; Alpgard, K. ; Anderer, P. ; et al.
Phys.Rept. 154 (1987) 247-383, 1987.
Inspire Record 244829 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.19330

None

3 data tables
Table 1

Mean charged multiplicity for NSD events extrapolated to the full phase space.

Table 2

Charged particle pseudorapidity density for NSD events at pseudorapidiy = 0.

Table 3

Corrected charged particle multiplicity distribution for NSD events.


rivet Analysis
Multi - Hadronic Events at E(c.m.) = 29-GeV and Predictions of QCD Models from E(c.m.) = 29-GeV to E(c.m.) = 93-GeV

Petersen, A. ; Abrams, G.S. ; Adolphsen, Chris ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 37 (1988) 1, 1988.
Inspire Record 246184 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.4114

Multihadronic e+e− annihilation events at a center-of-mass energy of 29 GeV have been studied with both the original (PEP 5) Mark II and the upgraded Mark II detectors. Detector-corrected distributions from global shape analyses such as aplanarity, Q2-Q1, sphericity, thrust, minor value, oblateness, and jet masses, and inclusive charged-particle distributions including x, rapidity, p⊥, and particle flow are presented. These distributions are compared with predictions from various multihadron event models which use leading-logarithmic shower evolution or QCD matrix elements at the parton level and string or cluster fragmentation for hadronization. The new generation of parton-shower models gives, on the average, a better description of the data than the previous parton-shower models. The energy behavior of these models is compared to existing e+e− data. The predictions of the models at a center-of-mass energy of 93 GeV, roughly the expected mass of the Z0, are also presented.

74 data tables
Table 1

Aplanarity distribution.

Table 2

QX Distribution(QX=SQRT(3)*(Q3-Q2)).

Table 3

The (Q2-Q1) distribution.

More…

rivet Analysis
EXCLUSIVE PRODUCTION OF PROTON - ANTI-PROTON PAIRS IN TWO PHOTON COLLISIONS AT PEP

The TPC/Two Gamma collaboration Aihara, H. ; Alston-Garnjost, M. ; Avery, R.E. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 36 (1987) 3506, 1987.
Inspire Record 246557 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.23356

We report cross sections for the process γγ→pp¯ at center-of-mass energies W from 2.0 to 2.8 GeV. These results have been extracted from measurements of e+e−→e+e−pp¯ at an overall center-of-mass energy of 29 GeV, using the TPC/Two-Gamma facility at the SLAC storage ring PEP. Cross sections for the untagged mode [both photons nearly real] are shown to lie well above QCD predictions. Results are also presented for the single-tagged mode [one photon in the range 0.16

3 data tables
Table 1

Data read from graph in preprint. Statistical errors only.

Table 2

Data read from graph. Statistical errors only.

Table 3

Data read from graph. Statistical errors only.


rivet Analysis
Observation of $\Omega^-$ Production in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at 29-{GeV}

Klein, S. ; Himel, T. ; Abrams, G.S. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 59 (1987) 2412, 1987.
Inspire Record 247900 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20175

Inclusive Ω− production in e+e− annihilation at 29 GeV has been measured with the Mark II detector. From an integrated luminosity of 207 pb−1, we determine a production rate of 0.014±0.006±0.004 Ω−, Ω¯+ per hadronic event. This is roughly 35 times the Lund-model prediction of 0.0004 Ω−, Ω¯+ per hadronic event, but comparable to the Webber-model prediction of 0.006 Ω−, Ω¯+ per hadronic event. The large rate of Ω− production, compared with production rates for other baryons, and with theoretical predictions based on diquark models, indicates that spin suppression does not hold for Ω− production.

2 data tables
Table 1

Radiatively corrected inclusive cross section.

Table 2

Extrapolation to full momentum range.


rivet Analysis
Determination of $\alpha^- s$ From Energy-energy Correlations in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at 29-{GeV}

Wood, D.R. ; Petersen, A. ; Abrams, G.S. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 37 (1988) 3091, 1988.
Inspire Record 250899 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.23323

We have studied the energy-energy correlation in e+e− annihilation into hadrons at √s =29 GeV using the Mark II detector at the SLAC storage ring PEP. We find to O(αs2) that αs=0.158±0.003±0.008 if hadronization is described by string fragmentation. Independent fragmentation schemes give αs=0.10–0.14, and give poor agreement with the data. A leading-log shower fragmentation model is found to describe the data well.

6 data tables
Table 1

Correlation data from the original PEP-5 detector.

Table 2

Correlation Asymmetry data from the original PEP-5 detector.

Table 3

Correlation data from the upgraded detector.

More…

Energy Dependence of the Charge Asymmetry a ($T (\pi$), $\theta$) in $\pi d$ Elastic Scattering

Smith, G.R. ; Gill, D.R. ; Ottewell, D. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.C 38 (1988) 240-250, 1988.
Inspire Record 250814 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.26223

Angular distributions of charge asymmetry A(Tπ,θ), have been measured for πd elastic scattering. Data were obtained in the backward hemisphere for pion bombarding energies of 143, 180, 220, and 256 MeV. The results are compared with predictions employing different mass and width parameters for the delta isobars.

4 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

Charged $K^*$ Production in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilations at 29-{GeV}

Abachi, S. ; Baringer, Philip S. ; Bylsma, B.G. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 199 (1987) 151-154, 1987.
Inspire Record 22433 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.6521

We report a measurement of the charged K ∗ (892) production in e + e − annihilations at 29 GeV center-of-mass energy. The 300 pb −1 data sample used for this analysis is obtained with the High Resolution Spectrometer at the SLAC storage ring PEP. The total mean multiplicity is measured to be 〈n K ∗± (892) 〉=0.62±0.045±0.04 per hadronic event. Evidence is also given for the production of a charged K 2 ∗ (1430) tensor meson.

6 data tables
Table 1

Extrapolation to full x-range using Lund model.

Table 2

Data requested from authors.

Table 3

Extrapolation to full x-range usisng fragmentation friction predicted by the Webber cluster model.

More…