Two-dimensional $\Delta\phi$ vs. $\Delta\eta$ correlation functions for non-pion triggers from 0-10% most-central Au+Au data at 200 GeV. All trigger and associated charged hadrons are selected in the respective pT ranges 4 < $p_T^{trig}$ < 5 GeV/c and 1.5 < $p_T^{assoc}$ < 4 GeV/c.

Two-dimensional $\Delta\phi$ vs. $\Delta\eta$ correlation functions for pion triggers from minimum-bias d+Au data at 200 GeV. All trigger and associated charged hadrons are selected in the respective pT ranges 4 < $p_T^{trig}$ < 5 GeV/c and 1.5 < $p_T^{assoc}$ < 4 GeV/c.

Two-dimensional $\Delta\phi$ vs. $\Delta\eta$ correlation functions for pion triggers from 0-10% most-central Au+Au data at 200 GeV. All trigger and associated charged hadrons are selected in the respective pT ranges 4 < $p_T^{trig}$ < 5 GeV/c and 1.5 < $p_T^{assoc}$ < 4 GeV/c.

The $\Delta\phi$ projections of the pure-cone correlations for |$\Delta\phi$| < $\pi$/4 for pion triggers.

The $\Delta\eta$ projections of the pure-cone correlations for |$\Delta\eta$| < 0.78 for pion triggers.

The $\Delta\phi$ projections of the pure-cone correlations for |$\Delta\phi$| < $\pi$/4 non-pion triggers.

The $\Delta\eta$ projections of the pure-cone correlations for |$\Delta\eta$| < 0.78 non-pion triggers.

$\Delta\phi$ projections over |$\Delta\eta$| < 1.5 in 0-10% Au+Au and minimum-bias d+Au data at 200 GeV after subtracting the jet-like fit components.

Extracted Fourier coefficients from fitting in $\pi$ 2 < $\Delta\phi$ < 3$\pi/2$ ) x (|$\Delta\eta$| < 1.5) (1.52 for d+Au), for pion, non-pion, and charged hadron triggers in the flow-based model.

Extracted Fourier coefficients from fitting in $\pi$ 2 < $\Delta\phi$ < 3$\pi/2$ ) x (|$\Delta\eta$| < 1.5) (1.52 for d+Au), for pion, non-pion, and charged hadron triggers in the flow-based model.

V3/V2 ratio for pion and non-pion triggers in Au+Au, and the extrapolated value for "pure protons".

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2^{1/2}$ difference between quadruplets at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$).

The two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$ for one particle while averaged over $\eta$ of the partner particle.

The two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$.

The two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$ for one particle while averaged over $\eta$ of the partner particle.

The difference in two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$ for one particle while averaged over $\eta$ of the partner particle.

No description provided.

V3{2} as a function of $\eta$.

<$V_3^2$> as a function of $\eta$.

The $\Delta\eta$-dependent component of the two-particle cumulant with $\Delta\eta$-gap, $D^-$ in Eq. (11), of the second harmonic is shown as a function of ??-gap |$\Delta\eta$| > x.

The $\Delta\eta$-dependent component of the two-particle cumulant with $\Delta\eta$-gap, $D^-$ in Eq. (11), of the third harmonic is shown as a function of ??-gap |$\Delta\eta$| > x.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the second harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the second harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the second harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the third harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $sqrt{\delta_2}$, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the third harmonic.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuation $\sigma_2/<v_2>$ centrality dependence in $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $Corr_{\gamma\,-ch}^{real}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $Corr_{\gamma\,-ch}^{mixed}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $\omega_{\gamma}^{real}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $\omega_{\gamma}^{mixed}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $v_{dyn}^{real}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $v_{dyn}^{mixed}$ is plotted.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the same side.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the same side.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the away-side.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the away-side.

The correlation between positive and negative charged particles measured by the FTPC and photons measured by the PMD using $v_{dyn}$ for real events.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for first order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for first order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for second order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for second order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for third order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for third order of m.

The moments $r_{m,1}$(m=1-3) for real and mixed events as a function of order m in a fixed multiplicity bin of 47$\langle \sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }\langle 54$.

The $\Lambda\Lambda$ interaction parameters from this experiment.

Signal-to-background (S/B) ratio as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 62.4 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Inclusive electron elliptic flow v2\{2\} as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Inclusive electron elliptic flow v2\{4\} as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Inclusive electron elliptic flow v2\{2\} as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 39 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Inclusive electron elliptic flow v2\{2\} as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 62.4 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Inclusive electron elliptic flow v2\{2\} as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with High Tower (high pT) trigger

Photonic electron elliptic flow v2 as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 39 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Photonic electron elliptic flow v2 as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 62.4 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Photonic electron elliptic flow v2 as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Elliptic flow v2\{2\} of electrons from heavy-flavor hadron decays, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Elliptic flow v2\{4\} of electrons from heavy-flavor hadron decays, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Elliptic flow v2\{2\} of electrons from heavy-flavor hadron decays, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with High Tower (high pT) trigger

Elliptic flow v2\{EP\} of electrons from heavy-flavor hadron decays, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with High Tower (high pT) trigger

Elliptic flow v2\{2\} of electrons from heavy-flavor hadron decays, Au+Au 39 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Elliptic flow v2\{2}\ of electrons from heavy-flavor hadron decays, Au+Au 62.4 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Inclusive jet $A_{LL}$ vs. parton jet $p_T$ for 0.5<|eta|<1.0.

The uncertainties on the parton jet pT values are strongly correlated across the bins. The point-to-point statistical and systematic uncertainties on the measured A_LL values given above are only weakly correlated among the bins. The correlation matrix for the quadrature sum of the point-to-point statistical and systematic uncertainties is given below. In that matrix, the order of the rows and columns matches the bin numbering above. In addition to the point-to-point statistical and systematic uncertainties, there are two systematic uncertainties that are common to all the measured A_LL values (and not included in the systematic uncertainty numbers quoted above): (a) +/-0.0005 vertical shift uncertainty from relative luminosity and (b) +/-6.5% vertical scale uncertainty from polarization.

$A_{LL}$ model predictions for |eta|<0.5.

$A_{LL}$ model predictions for 0.5<|eta|<1.0.

$E_T^e$ distribution of $W^{\pm}$ candidate events, background contributions, and sum of backgrounds and W -> ev MC signal. This plot is for Positron 0.5<|eta|<1.1.

Signed $P_T$-balance distribution for e+/e- candidates reconstructed in the EEMC.

Distribution of the product of the TPC reconstructed charge sign and $E_T/p_T$.

Distribution of the invariant mass of Z/$\gamma^*$ -> e+ e- candidate events, with MC for comparison.

Longitudinal single-spin asymmetry $A_L$ for W+ production as a function of lepton pseudorapidity.

Longitudinal single-spin asymmetry $A_L$ for W- production as a function of lepton pseudorapidity.

Longitudinal single-spin asymmetry $A_L$ for W+ production as a function of lepton pseudorapidity.

Longitudinal double-spin asymmetry $A_{LL}$ for W+ production as a function of lepton pseudorapidity.

Longitudinal double-spin asymmetry $A_{LL}$ for W- production as a function of lepton pseudorapidity.

Longitudinal double-spin asymmetry $A_{LL}$ for theory $W^{+/-}$ production as a function of lepton pseudorapidity.

Integrated $D^0$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of $N_{\mathrm{part}}$ in different $p_{\rm T}$ regions, 0$-$8 ${\mathrm{GeV/}}c$ (squares), 0.7$-$2.2 ${\mathrm{GeV/}}c$ (diamonds) and 3$-$8 ${\mathrm{GeV/}}c$ (circles). Open symbols are for the 0$-$80% minimum bias events. The vertical bar around unity denotes the overall normalization uncertainty from p+p reference.

The three-point correlator, $\gamma$, as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV.

The three-point correlator, $\gamma$, as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV.

The three-point correlator, $\gamma$, as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 7.7.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 7.7 GeV.

$H_{SS}-H{OS}$, as a function of beam energy for 60-80% centrality in Au+Au collisions.

$H_{SS}-H{OS}$, as a function of beam energy for 30-60% centrality in Au+Au collisions.

$H_{SS}-H{OS}$, as a function of beam energy for 10-30% centrality in Au+Au collisions.

Sample fit projections onto the $q_{out}$, $q_{side}$, and $q_{long}$ axes respectively for four angular bins relative to the reaction. These projections are from results for 10-20% central, 19.6 GeV Au+Au collisions with 0.15 < $k_T$ < 0.6 GeV/c.

Energy dependence of the HBT parameters for central Au+Au, Pb+Pb, and Pb+Au collisions at mid-rapidity and $\langle k_T \rangle \approx 0.22$ GeV/c. Errors on NA44, NA49, WA98, and CERES, points include systematic errors.The systematic errors for STAR points at all energies (from Table II) are of similar size to error bar for 39 GeV, shown as a representative example. Errors on other results are statistical only, to emphasize the trend.

The $\langle m_T \rangle$ dependence of $R_{out}$, $R_{side}$ and $R_{long}$ for all energies at 0-5% centrality. Errors are statistical only. These plot shows the difference (between $R_{out}$ and $R_{side}$) and the ratio $R_{out}$ / $R_{side}$ respectively.

The $\langle m_T \rangle$ dependence of $R_{out}$, $R_{side}$ and $R_{long}$ for each energy and multiple centralities. Errors are statistical only.

The dependence of the HBT radii on multiplicity,$\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle^{1/3}$, for $k_T\approx 0.22$ GeV/c and$k_T\approx 0.39$ GeV/c. Results are for Au+Au collisions at STAR at 7 GeV. Errors are statistical only.

The dependence of the HBT radii on multiplicity,$\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle^{1/3}$, for $k_T\approx 0.22$ GeV/c and$k_T\approx 0.39$ GeV/c. Results are for Au+Au collisions at STAR at 11.5 GeV. Errors are statistical only.

The dependence of the HBT radii on multiplicity,$\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle^{1/3}$, for $k_T\approx 0.22$ GeV/c and$k_T\approx 0.39$ GeV/c. Results are for Au+Au collisions at STAR at 19.6 GeV. Errors are statistical only.

The dependence of the HBT radii on multiplicity,$\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle^{1/3}$, for $k_T\approx 0.22$ GeV/c and$k_T\approx 0.39$ GeV/c. Results are for Au+Au collisions at STAR at 27 GeV. Errors are statistical only.

The dependence of the HBT radii on multiplicity,$\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle^{1/3}$, for $k_T\approx 0.22$ GeV/c and$k_T\approx 0.39$ GeV/c. Results are for Au+Au collisions at STAR at 39 GeV. Errors are statistical only.

The dependence of the HBT radii on multiplicity,$\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle^{1/3}$, for $k_T\approx 0.22$ GeV/c and$k_T\approx 0.39$ GeV/c. Results are for Au+Au collisions at STAR at 62.4 GeV. Errors are statistical only.

The dependence of the HBT radii on multiplicity,$\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle^{1/3}$, for $k_T\approx 0.22$ GeV/c and$k_T\approx 0.39$ GeV/c. Results are for Au+Au collisions at STAR at 200 GeV. Errors are statistical only.

The dependence of the HBT radii on multiplicity,$\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle^{1/3}$, for $k_T\approx 0.22$ GeV/c and$k_T\approx 0.39$ GeV/c. Results are for Si+Al collisions at E802, Pb+Au at CERES, Pb+Pb at ALICE. Errors are statistical only.

The beam energy dependence of the volume of the regions of homogeneity at kinetic freeze-out in central Au+Au, Pb+Pb and Pb+Au collisions with $k_T\approx 0.22$ GeV/c.

The lifetime, $\tau$, of the system as a function of beam energy for central Au+Au collisions assuming a temperature of T = 0.12 GeV at kinetic freeze-out.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 7.7 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c for the azimuthally integrated radii and the 0th-order Fourier coefficients. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 7.7 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c, from the HHLW method (Gaussian fits to each angular bin) and a single global fit to all angular bins to directly. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at backward(−1<y<−0.5), forward(0.5<y<1)and mid(−0.5<y< 0.5) rapidity, in 7.7 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c using the global fit method. Error bars include only statistical uncertain- ties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 11.5 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c for the azimuthally integrated radii and the 0th-order Fourier coefficients. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 11.5 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c, from the HHLW method (Gaussian fits to each angular bin) and a single global fit to all angular bins to directly. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at backward(−1<y<−0.5), forward(0.5<y<1) and mid(−0.5<y< 0.5) rapidity, in 11.5 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c using the global fit method. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 19.6 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c for the azimuthally integrated radii and the 0th-order Fourier coefficients. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 19.6 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c, from the HHLW method (Gaussian fits to each angular bin) and a single global fit to all angular bins to directly. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at backward(−1<y<−0.5), forward(0.5<y<1) and mid(−0.5<y< 0.5) rapidity, in 19.6 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c using the global fit method. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 27 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c for the azimuthally integrated radii and the 0th-order Fourier coefficients. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 27 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c, from the HHLW method (Gaussian fits to each angular bin) and a single global fit to all angular bins to directly. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at backward(−1<y<−0.5), forward(0.5<y<1) and mid(−0.5<y< 0.5) rapidity, in 27 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c using the global fit method. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 39 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c for the azimuthally integrated radii and the 0th-order Fourier coefficients. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 39 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c, from the HHLW method (Gaussian fits to each angular bin) and a single global fit to all angular bins to directly. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at backward(−1<y<−0.5), forward(0.5<y<1) and mid(−0.5<y< 0.5) rapidity, in 39 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c using the global fit method. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 62.4 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c for the azimuthally integrated radii and the 0th-order Fourier coefficients. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 62.4 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c, from the HHLW method (Gaussian fits to each angular bin) and a single global fit to all angular bins to directly. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at backward(−1<y<−0.5), forward(0.5<y<1) and mid(−0.5<y< 0.5) rapidity, in 62.4 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c using the global fit method. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 200 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c for the azimuthally integrated radii and the 0th-order Fourier coefficients. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 200 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c, from the HHLW method (Gaussian fits to each angular bin) and a single global fit to all angular bins to directly. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at backward(−1<y<−0.5), forward(0.5<y<1) and mid(−0.5<y< 0.5) rapidity, in 200 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c using the global fit method. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Beam energy dependence of the $R_{ol,0}^2$ cross term for forward and backward rapidity with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c.

The eccentricity of the collisions at kinetic freez-out, εF , as a function of initial eccentricity relative to the participant plane, ε$_{PP}$, at mid-rapidity. All results are for ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties. The line has a slope of one indicating no change in shape.

The dependence of the kinetic freeze-out eccentricity of pions on collision energy in mid-central Au+Au collisions (E895, STAR) and Pb+Au collisions (CERES) for three rapidity regions and with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c. Several (2+1)D hydrodynamical models and UrQMD calculations are shown. Model centralities correspond to the data.

The dependence of the kinetic freeze-out eccentricity of pions on collision energy in mid-central Au+Au collisions using UrQMD calculations, (2+1)D hydro MC-KLN and (2+1)D hydro MC-GLB models with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties. Model centralities correspond to the data.

The dependence of the kinetic freeze-out eccentricity of pions on collision energy in mid-central Au+Au collisions using (2+1)D hydro EOS-Q, (2+1)D hydro EOS-H, and (2+1)D hydro EOS-I models with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties. Model centralities correspond to the data.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for the $\eta$ mass region.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for the charm + $ ho^0$ mass region.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for the $\omega$ mass region.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for the $\phi$ mass region.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for the charm + thermal radiation mass region.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV expected from decays of a mesonic cocktail.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV expected from decays of a mesonic cocktail.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV expected from decays of a mesonic cocktail.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV expected from decays of a mesonic cocktail.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV expected from decays of a mesonic cocktail.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV expected from the $car{c}$ contribution.

The $p_T$-integrated dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $M_{ee}$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $v_2$ of hadrons $\pi$, $K$, $p$, $\phi$ and $\Lambda$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for the $\pi^0$ mass region.

The $p_T$-integrated dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $M_{ee}$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, expected from the decays of $\pi^0$, $\eta$, $\omega$ and $\phi$ and from the $car{c}$ contribution.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected mean (M) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected mean (M) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected mean (M) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected mean (M) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected standard deviation ($\sigma$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 7.7 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected standard deviation ($\sigma$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected standard deviation ($\sigma$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected standard deviation ($\sigma$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected standard deviation ($\sigma$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected standard deviation ($\sigma$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected standard deviation ($\sigma$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected skewness ($S$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 7.7 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected skewness ($S$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected skewness ($S$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected skewness ($S$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected skewness ($S$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected skewness ($S$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected skewness ($S$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected kurtosis ($\kappa$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 7.7 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected kurtosis ($\kappa$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected kurtosis ($\kappa$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected kurtosis ($\kappa$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected kurtosis ($\kappa$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected kurtosis ($\kappa$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected kurtosis ($\kappa$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 7.7 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 7.7 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\sigma^2/M$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of collision energy for Au+Au collisions. The error bars are statistical and the caps represent systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of collision energy for Au+Au collisions. The error bars are statistical and the caps represent systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of collision energy for Au+Au collisions. The error bars are statistical and the caps represent systematic errors.

Directed flow for $\pi^{+}$ and $\pi^{-}$ versus rapidity for intermediate-centrality (10-40$\%$) Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200, 62.4, 39, 27, 19.6, 11.5 and 7.7 GeV. Errors are statistical only.

Directed flow slope $dv_{1}/dy$ of protons, antiprotons and $\pi^{\pm}$ near midrapidity versus beam energy for intermediate-centrality (10-40$\%$) Au+Au collisions.

Directed flow slope $dv_{1}/dy$ of net-protons near midrapidity versus beam energy for intermediate-centrality (10-40$\%$) Au+Au collisions. Datapoints for protons and antiprotons can be found in Table5.

e+ e− invariant mass spectrum from $\sqrt{s_{{NN}}}$ = 200 GeV Au + Au minimum bias (0%–80%) collisions compared to a hadronic cocktail simulation.

Mass spectrum of the excess (data minus cocktail) in the low mass region compared to model calculations. Green brackets depict the total systematic uncertainties including those from cocktails. Systematic errors are highly correlated across all data points.

Integrated dielectron yields in the mass regions of 0.30-0.76 (rho-like), 0.76-0.80 (omega-like), and 0.98-1.05 (phi-like) GeV/c^2 compared to hadronic cocktails within the STAR acceptance as a function of centrality.

Integrated dielectron yields in the mass regions of 0.30-0.76 (rho-like), 0.76-0.80 (omega-like), and 0.98-1.05 (phi-like) GeV/c^2 compared to hadronic cocktails within the STAR acceptance as a function of dielectron $p_T$.

Yields scaled by Npart for the rho-like region with cocktail subtracted, the omega-like and phi-like regions without subtraction as a function of Npart.

Dielectron mass spectra scaled with Npart from minimum bias (0%–80%) collisions.

Dielectron mass spectra scaled with Npart from central (0%–10%) collisions.

The ratio of Npart scaled dielectron yields between the central and minimum bias collisions.

$R_{dAu}$ vs. $y$.

Comparison of our d+Au measurements to the pA measurements from E772. Ratio of $\Upsilon$ production in pA to pp scaled by mass number as a function of mass number. Shown are the 1S and 2S+3S $\Upsilon$ measurements from E772 and our 1S measurement.

Comparison of our d+Au measurements to the pA measurements from E772. Exponent $\alpha$ as a function of $x_{F}$.

Invariant mass distributions of electron pairs in the region $|y_{ee}| < 1.0$ for the centrality selections $30-60\%$.

Invariant mass distributions of electron pairs in the region $|y_{ee}| < 1.0$ for the centrality selections $10-30\%$.

Invariant mass distributions of electron pairs in the region $|y_{ee}| < 1.0$ for the centrality selections $0-10\%$.

Nuclear modification factor for $\Upsilon$(1S+2S+3S), in $|y| < 1.0$ in d+Au and Au+Au collisions as a function of $N_{part}$.

Nuclear modification factor for $\Upsilon$(1S+2S+3S), in $|y| < 0.5$, in d+Au and Au+Au collisions as a function of $N_{part}$.

Nuclear modification factor for $\Upsilon$(1S) in $|y| < 1.0$, in d+Au and Au+Au collisions as a function of $N_{part}$.

Nuclear modification factor for $\Upsilon$(1S) in $|y| < 0.5$, in d+Au and Au+Au collisions as a function of $N_{part}$.

Nuclear modification factor of quarkonium states as a function of binding energy as measured by STAR.

Total $J/\psi$ efficiency as a function of cos$\theta$ for $2 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 3$ GeV/c

Total $J/\psi$ efficiency as a function of cos$\theta$ for $3 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 4$ GeV/c

Total $J/\psi$ efficiency as a function of cos$\theta$ for $4 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 6$ GeV/c

Different contributions to total $J/\psi$ efficiency as a function of cos$\theta$ for $2 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 3$ GeV/c

Different contributions to total $J/\psi$ efficiency as a function of cos$\theta$ for $3 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 4$ GeV/c

Different contributions to total $J/\psi$ efficiency as a function of cos$\theta$ for $4 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 6$ GeV/c

Corrected cos$\theta$ distribution for $2 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 3$ GeV/c

Corrected cos$\theta$ distribution for $3 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 4$ GeV/c

Corrected cos$\theta$ distribution for $4 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 6$ GeV/c

$J/\psi$ polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ as a function of $J/\psi$ $p_{T}$ for rapidity |y|<1

The invariant yield versus transverse momentum for |y| < 1 in 0-60% centrality in Au+Au collisions (solid circles). The results are compared to high-$p_T$ (3 < $p_T$ < 10 GeV/c) results from STAR [9] (solid squares) and PHENIX data [8] (open squares). Also shown is the yield in 0-60% centrality Cu+Cu collisions for low $p_T$ (solid triangles) and high $p_T$ [48] (open triangles). The models are described in the text [49, 50]. The $J/\psi$ cross section in p+p collisions is also shown at STAR (stars) and PHENIX [51] (diamonds), and the scale is indicated on the right axis.

The $J/\psi$ nuclear modification factor versus transverse momentum for |y| < 1 and $p_T$ < 5 GeV/c for 0-60% centrality Au+Au collisions (solid circles). The data are compared with STAR high-$p_T$ (5 < $p_T$ < 10 GeV/c) results [9] and PHENIX results [8] in |y| < 0.35 (open squares). The statistical and systematic uncertainties on the baseline $J/\psi$ cross section in p+p collisions are indicated by the hatched and solid bands, respectively. Boxes on the vertical axes represent the uncertainty on $N_{coll}$ combined with the uncertainty on the inelastic cross section in p+p collisions

The $J/\psi$ nuclear modification factor versus transverse momentum for |y| < 1 and $p_T$ < 5 GeV/c for 0-20% centrality Au+Au collisions (solid circles). The data are compared with STAR high-$p_T$ (5 < $p_T$ < 10 GeV/c) results [9] and PHENIX results [8] in |y| < 0.35 (open squares). The statistical and systematic uncertainties on the baseline $J/\psi$ cross section in p+p collisions are indicated by the hatched and solid bands, respectively. Boxes on the vertical axes represent the uncertainty on $N_{coll}$ combined with the uncertainty on the inelastic cross section in p+p collisions

The $J/\psi$ nuclear modification factor versus transverse momentum for |y| < 1 and $p_T$ < 5 GeV/c for 20-40% centrality Au+Au collisions (solid circles). The data are compared with STAR high-$p_T$ (5 < $p_T$ < 10 GeV/c) results [9] and PHENIX results [8] in |y| < 0.35 (open squares). The statistical and systematic uncertainties on the baseline $J/\psi$ cross section in p+p collisions are indicated by the hatched and solid bands, respectively. Boxes on the vertical axes represent the uncertainty on $N_{coll}$ combined with the uncertainty on the inelastic cross section in p+p collisions

The $J/\psi$ nuclear modification factor versus transverse momentum for |y| < 1 and $p_T$ < 5 GeV/c for 40-60% centrality Au+Au collisions (solid circles). The data are compared with STAR high-$p_T$ (5 < $p_T$ < 10 GeV/c) results [9] and PHENIX results [8] in |y| < 0.35 (open squares). The statistical and systematic uncertainties on the baseline $J/\psi$ cross section in p+p collisions are indicated by the hatched and solid bands, respectively. Boxes on the vertical axes represent the uncertainty on $N_{coll}$ combined with the uncertainty on the inelastic cross section in p+p collisions

The $J/\psi$ invariant yield and nuclear modification factor as a function of centrality for |y| < 1 in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $J/\psi$ invariant yield $Bd^2N/(2\pi p_Tdydp_T) [(GeV/c)^{-2}]$ and nuclear modification factor as a function of transverse momentum for |y| < 1 in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $J/\psi$ invariant yield and nuclear modification factor for |y| < 1 in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=11.5$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=11.5$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

Collision energy and centrality dependence of the net-proton $S\sigma$ and $\kappa\sigma^2$ from Au+Au and p+p collisions at RHIC.

Collision energy and centrality dependence of the net-proton $S\sigma$ and $\kappa\sigma^2$ from Au+Au and p+p collisions at RHIC.

Collision energy and centrality dependence of the net-proton $S\sigma$ and $\kappa\sigma^2$ from Au+Au and p+p collisions at RHIC.

Collision energy and centrality dependence of the net-proton $S\sigma$ and $\kappa\sigma^2$ from Au+Au and p+p collisions at RHIC.

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=11.5$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=11.5$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=11.5$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Comparison of data to Monte Carlo for the distributions of two-photon invariant mass (left) and energy for the higher (center) and lower (right) energy photon.

Invariant mass distribution for the two-photon system with 7 < pT < 8 GeV/c.

Signal fractions calculated within the “peak region” of 0.1 < $M_{\gamma\gamma}$ < 0.2 $GeV/c^{2}$. Fractions for the full dataset as well as the subsets of longitudinal and transverse polarizations are shown as a function of pT (left), and the fractions for the transversely polarized data are shown as a function of $x_{F}$ integrated over 5 < pT < 12 GeV/c (right).

Signal fractions calculated within the “peak region” of 0.1 < $M_{\gamma\gamma}$ < 0.2 $GeV/c^{2}$. Fractions for the full dataset as well as the subsets of longitudinal and transverse polarizations are shown as a function of pT (left), and the fractions for the transversely polarized data are shown as a function of $x_{F}$ integrated over 5 < pT < 12 GeV/c (right).

Upper panel, the $\pi^{0}$ cross section (blue markers) is shown compared with an NLO pQCD cal- culation with three options for the scale parameter. The lower panel presents the ratio of the data to the pT-scale theory curve, as well as the ratio of the 2pT-scale and pT/2-scale theory curves to the pT-scale curve.

Upper panel, the $\pi^{0}$ cross section (blue markers) is shown compared with an NLO pQCD cal- culation with three options for the scale parameter. The lower panel presents the ratio of the data to the pT-scale theory curve, as well as the ratio of the 2pT-scale and pT/2-scale theory curves to the pT-scale curve.

The ALL results (blue markers) are presented with the DSSV prediction and the GRSV prediction using the best fit to polarized DIS ($\Delta$ g = std) and the maximum and minimum allowed values for gluon polarization.

The ALL results (blue markers) are presented with the DSSV prediction and the GRSV prediction using the best fit to polarized DIS ($\Delta$ g = std) and the maximum and minimum allowed values for gluon polarization.

The ALL results (blue markers) are presented with the DSSV prediction and the GRSV prediction using the best fit to polarized DIS ($\Delta$ g = std) and the maximum and minimum allowed values for gluon polarization.

The AN results are plotted versus $x_{F}$ integrated over 5 < pT < 12 GeV/c (left panel) and versus pT integrated over 0.06 < |$x_{F}$| < 0.27 (right panel).

The AN results are plotted versus $x_{F}$ integrated over 5 < pT < 12 GeV/c (left panel) and versus pT integrated over 0.06 < |$x_{F}$| < 0.27 (right panel).

The AN results are plotted versus $x_{F}$ integrated over 5 < pT < 12 GeV/c (left panel) and versus pT integrated over 0.06 < |x_{F}| < 0.27 (right panel).

The AN results are plotted versus $x_{F}$ integrated over 5 < pT < 12 GeV/c (left panel) and versus pT integrated over 0.06 < |$x_{F}$| < 0.27 (right panel).

The correlation differences $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle=\delta\langle A^{2}_{UD}\rangle-\delta\langle A^{2}_{ LR}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle=\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}-\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ as a function of $p_{T}$. The data are from 20-40% central (upper) and 0-20% central (lower) Au+Au collisions.

The charge asymmetry correlations $\delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ (left panels) and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (center panels), and correlation differences $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle=\delta\langle A^{2}_{ UD}\rangle-\delta\langle A^{2}_{ LR}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle=\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}-\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ (right panels), as a function of the azimuthal elliptic anisotropy of high-$p_{T}$ ($p_{T}>2$~GeV/$c$) particles (upper panels) and low-$p_{T}$ ($p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$) particles (lower panels). Data are from 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The particle $p_{T}$ range of $0.15<p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$ is used for both EP construction and asymmetry calculation.

The charge asymmetry correlations $\delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ (left panels) and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (center panels), and correlation differences $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle=\delta\langle A^{2}_{ UD}\rangle-\delta\langle A^{2}_{ LR}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle=\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}-\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ (right panels), as a function of the azimuthal elliptic anisotropy of high-$p_{T}$ ($p_{T}>2$~GeV/$c$) particles (upper panels) and low-$p_{T}$ ($p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$) particles (lower panels). Data are from 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The particle $p_{T}$ range of $0.15<p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$ is used for both EP construction and asymmetry calculation.

The wedge size dependences of charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations (upper panel), and their differences between out-of-plane and in-plane, $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (lower panel) for 20-40% central Au+Au collisions.

The wedge size dependences of charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations (upper panel), and their differences between out-of-plane and in-plane, $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (lower panel) for 20-40% central Au+Au collisions.

Charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations as a function of the wedge location, $\phi_{ w}$, in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. The wedge size is $30^{\circ}$. The curves are the characteristic $\cos(2\phi_{ w}$) to guide the eye.

The wedge size dependence of the difference between the same-sign and opposite-sign, $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$.

The values of $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$, scaled by $N_{part}$, as a function of the measured average elliptic anisotropy $<v^{obs}_{2}}>$ in Au+Au collisions. The centrality bin number is labeled by each data point, 0 for 70-80% up to 8 for 0-5%.

$\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$, the event-by-event elliptical anisotropy of particle distributions relative to the second-harmonic event plane reconstructed from TPC tracks (left panel) and the first harmonic event plane reconstructed from the ZDC-SMD neutron signals (middle panel), in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. Right panel: Average $\Delta$ for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ relative to the TPC event plane as a function of centrality.

$\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$, the event-by-event elliptical anisotropy of particle distributions relative to the second-harmonic event plane reconstructed from TPC tracks (left panel) and the first harmonic event plane reconstructed from the ZDC-SMD neutron signals (middle panel), in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. Right panel: Average $\Delta$ for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ relative to the TPC event plane as a function of centrality.

$\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$, the event-by-event elliptical anisotropy of particle distributions relative to the second-harmonic event plane reconstructed from TPC tracks (left panel) and the first harmonic event plane reconstructed from the ZDC-SMD neutron signals (middle panel), in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. Right panel: Average $\Delta$ for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ relative to the TPC event plane as a function of centrality.

Left panel: $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP in 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The lines depict the results with reconstructed EP lower right panel for comparison. Middle panel: The differences in $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ between the reconstructed EP and random EP results, respectively. Right panel: $\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP (open triangles).

Left panel: $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP in 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The lines depict the results with reconstructed EP lower right panel for comparison. Middle panel: The differences in $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ between the reconstructed EP and random EP results, respectively. Right panel: $\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP (open triangles).

Left panel: $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP in 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The lines depict the results with reconstructed EP lower right panel for comparison. Middle panel: The differences in $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ between the reconstructed EP and random EP results, respectively. Right panel: $\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP (open triangles).

The correlation differences, $\langle A^{2}_{ LR}\rangle-\langle A^{2}_{ UD}\rangle$ and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}-\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$, scaled by the number of participants $(\pi/4)^2 N_{part}$. Also shown are $\langle \cos(\phi_{\alpha}+\phi_{\beta}-2\phi_{c})\rangle/v_{2,c} \approx \langle \cos(\phi_{\alpha}+\phi_{\beta}-2\psi_{ RP}) \rangle$ of same- and opposite-sign particle pairs ($\alpha$ and $\beta$) calculated from particles used for the charge asymmetry correlations with particle $c$ from those used for EP construction. The upper panel shows the default results where particles are divided according to $\eta$; the lower panel shows results with particles divided randomly into two halves and compared to published correlators.

The correlation differences, $\langle A^{2}_{ LR}\rangle-\langle A^{2}_{ UD}\rangle$ and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}-\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$, scaled by the number of participants $(\pi/4)^2 N_{part}$. Also shown are $\langle \cos(\phi_{\alpha}+\phi_{\beta}-2\phi_{c})\rangle/v_{2,c} \approx \langle \cos(\phi_{\alpha}+\phi_{\beta}-2\psi_{ RP}) \rangle$ of same- and opposite-sign particle pairs ($\alpha$ and $\beta$) calculated from particles used for the charge asymmetry correlations with particle $c$ from those used for EP construction. The upper panel shows the default results where particles are divided according to $\eta$; the lower panel shows results with particles divided randomly into two halves and compared to published correlators.

Upper panel: Positively charged particle multiplicity distributions versus the azimuthal angle, $\phi$, in 30-40% central Au+Au collisions. The data are shown separately for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. The magnetic polarities of the STAR magnet have been summed and the $p_{T}$ is integrated over the range $0.15<p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$. The inverse of these distributions, properly normalized, were used to correct for the track efficiency versus $\phi$. Lower panel: Reconstructed event-plane azimuthal angle distributions in 30-40% central Au+Au collisions. Particles within $0.15 < p_{T} < 2$~GeV/$c$ from $\eta<0$ and $\eta>0$ were used separately to reconstruct the EP.

Upper panel: Positively charged particle multiplicity distributions versus the azimuthal angle, $\phi$, in 30-40% central Au+Au collisions. The data are shown separately for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. The magnetic polarities of the STAR magnet have been summed and the $p_{T}$ is integrated over the range $0.15<p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$. The inverse of these distributions, properly normalized, were used to correct for the track efficiency versus $\phi$. Lower panel: Reconstructed event-plane azimuthal angle distributions in 30-40% central Au+Au collisions. Particles within $0.15 < p_{T} < 2$~GeV/$c$ from $\eta<0$ and $\eta>0$ were used separately to reconstruct the EP.

The relative charge asymmetry correlations, $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}/\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$, as a function of the number of participants, $N_{part}$, for four combinations of $\eta$ ranges used for EP reconstruction and asymmetry calculation.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency. The colored curves are the corresponding statistical fluctuations and detector effects. The results are separated for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. Only $\eta>0$ is shown for $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ and $\eta<0$ for $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ for clarity.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency. The colored curves are the corresponding statistical fluctuations and detector effects. The results are separated for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. Only $\eta>0$ is shown for $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ and $\eta<0$ for $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ for clarity.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency. The colored curves are the corresponding statistical fluctuations and detector effects. The results are separated for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. Only $\eta>0$ is shown for $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ and $\eta<0$ for $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ for clarity.

Left panel: Statistical fluctuation and detector effects in the charge asymmetry variance (multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$) from the $\eta<0$ region. The dotted curve shows the $1/N$ approximation, the dashed curve shows the statistical fluctuations $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat}}\rangle$ obtained by the (50-50) method (see the text). The solid curve connecting the solid points shows the net effect of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities, $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, obtained by the adding-$\pi$ method, and the crosses shows the same but obtained from the ``scramble'' method. See the text for details. Middle panel: The statistical fluctuation effects relative to the $1/N$ approximation (thin curves) and the effects due to the imperfect detector (thick curves). The dashed curves are for the region $\eta>0$ and the solid curves are for $\eta<0$. Right panel: The ratios of the statistical fluctuation and detector effects $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$ and $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, separately for the $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$ regions. The $\phi$-acceptance correction was applied for the results in this figure.

Left panel: Statistical fluctuation and detector effects in the charge asymmetry variance (multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$) from the $\eta<0$ region. The dotted curve shows the $1/N$ approximation, the dashed curve shows the statistical fluctuations $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat}}\rangle$ obtained by the (50-50) method (see the text). The solid curve connecting the solid points shows the net effect of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities, $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, obtained by the adding-$\pi$ method, and the crosses shows the same but obtained from the ``scramble'' method. See the text for details. Middle panel: The statistical fluctuation effects relative to the $1/N$ approximation (thin curves) and the effects due to the imperfect detector (thick curves). The dashed curves are for the region $\eta>0$ and the solid curves are for $\eta<0$. Right panel: The ratios of the statistical fluctuation and detector effects $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$ and $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, separately for the $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$ regions. The $\phi$-acceptance correction was applied for the results in this figure.

Left panel: Statistical fluctuation and detector effects in the charge asymmetry variance (multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$) from the $\eta<0$ region. The dotted curve shows the $1/N$ approximation, the dashed curve shows the statistical fluctuations $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat}}\rangle$ obtained by the (50-50) method (see the text). The solid curve connecting the solid points shows the net effect of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities, $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, obtained by the adding-$\pi$ method, and the crosses shows the same but obtained from the ``scramble'' method. See the text for details. Middle panel: The statistical fluctuation effects relative to the $1/N$ approximation (thin curves) and the effects due to the imperfect detector (thick curves). The dashed curves are for the region $\eta>0$ and the solid curves are for $\eta<0$. Right panel: The ratios of the statistical fluctuation and detector effects $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$ and $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, separately for the $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$ regions. The $\phi$-acceptance correction was applied for the results in this figure.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, separately for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. The star and triangle depict the results from $d$+Au collisions. The net effects of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities are shown as the curves.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, separately for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. The star and triangle depict the results from $d$+Au collisions. The net effects of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities are shown as the curves.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, separately for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. The star and triangle depict the results from $d$+Au collisions. The net effects of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities are shown as the curves.

The statistical and detector effect subtracted asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}_{+,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\delta\langle A^{2}_{-,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency.

The statistical and detector effect subtracted asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}_{+,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\delta\langle A^{2}_{-,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency.

The statistical and detector effect subtracted asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}_{+,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\delta\langle A^{2}_{-,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency.

Dynamical charge asymmetry variance after removing the statistical and detector effects, $\delta\langle A^{2}_{\pm,{ LR}}\rangle=\langle A^{2}_{\pm,{ LR}}\rangle-\langle A^{2}_{\pm,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, scaled by the number of participants $N_{part}$. The results are consistent between positive and negative $\eta$ regions and between positive and negative charges.

The second-harmonic event-plane resolution of sub-events ($\eta<0$ and $\eta>0$) as a function of the number of participants.

Charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ (left panel) and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (middle panel), and their differences between UD\ and LR\ (right panel) as a function of the event-plane resolution $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=\sqrt{\mean{\cos2(\psi_{{ EP},\eta>0}(f)-\psi_{{ EP},\eta<0}(f))}}$ in 20-30% central Au+Au collisions. The solid lines are free linear fits to the data, while the dashed lines are linear fits with the intercept fixed to zero at $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=0$.

Charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ (left panel) and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (middle panel), and their differences between UD\ and LR\ (right panel) as a function of the event-plane resolution $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=\sqrt{\mean{\cos2(\psi_{{ EP},\eta>0}(f)-\psi_{{ EP},\eta<0}(f))}}$ in 20-30% central Au+Au collisions. The solid lines are free linear fits to the data, while the dashed lines are linear fits with the intercept fixed to zero at $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=0$.

TCharge multiplicity asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ (left panel) and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (middle panel), and their differences between UD\ and LR\ (right panel) as a function of the event-plane resolution $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=\sqrt{\mean{\cos2(\psi_{{ EP},\eta>0}(f)-\psi_{{ EP},\eta<0}(f))}}$ in 20-30% central Au+Au collisions. The solid lines are free linear fits to the data, while the dashed lines are linear fits with the intercept fixed to zero at $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=0$.

The TPC second-harmonic (upper left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (upper right) event-plane resolution as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. The TPC second-harmonic (lower left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (lower right) event-plane resolution for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ as a function of centrality.

The TPC second-harmonic (upper left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (upper right) event-plane resolution as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. The TPC second-harmonic (lower left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (lower right) event-plane resolution for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ as a function of centrality.

The TPC second-harmonic (upper left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (upper right) event-plane resolution as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. The TPC second-harmonic (lower left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (lower right) event-plane resolution for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ as a function of centrality.

The TPC second-harmonic (upper left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (upper right) event-plane resolution as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. The TPC second-harmonic (lower left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (lower right) event-plane resolution for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ as a function of centrality.

Jet-hadron correlations after background subtraction. Shown with Gaussian fits to jet peaks and systematic uncertanty bands Au+Au(4-6 GeV).

Gaussian widths of the awayside jet peaks in p+p(10-15 GeV).

Gaussian widths of the awayside jet peaks in Au+Au(10-15 GeV).

Gaussian widths of the awayside jet peaks in p+p(20-40 GeV).

Gaussian widths of the awayside jet peaks in Au+Au(20-40 GeV).

Awayside momentum difference(DAA) shown for 10-15 GeV.

Awayside momentum difference(DAA) shown for 10-15 GeV.

(Color online) Modulated sign correlations (msc) compared to the three-point correlator versus centrality for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. Shown with triangles is the msc, Eq. 5. The systematic uncertainties will be shown in detail in Fig. 7. Diamonds and circles show the three-point correlator, Eq. 1, and the grey bars reflect the conditions of $\Delta p_{T}$ > 0.15 GeV/c and $\Delta\eta$ > 0.15 applied to the three-point correlator, to be discussed in the text. For comparison, the model calculation of THERMINATOR [21] is also shown.

(Color online) The msc split into 2 composite parts versus centrality for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. Shaded areas represent the systematic uncertainty due to the event plane determination. For comparison with the $\Delta$msc term, we also put $−\nu_{2}/N$ and the model calculation of MEVSIM [24], to be described in the text.

(Color online) The msc split into 2 composite parts versus centrality for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. Shaded areas represent the systematic uncertainty due to the event plane determination. For comparison with the $\Delta$msc term, we also put $−\nu_{2}/N$ and the model calculation of MEVSIM [24], to be described in the text.

(Color online) Three-point correlations split up into out-of-plane $(\langle sin(\Delta\phi_{\alpha}) sin(\Delta\phi_{\beta})\rangle)$ and in-plane $(\langle cos(\Delta\phi_{\alpha}) cos(\Delta\phi_{\beta})\rangle)$ composite parts for 40 − 60% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ GeV. (a)shows the correlations versus $\langle\eta\rangle$ = $(\eta_{\alpha}+\eta_{\beta})/2$. (b) shows the correlations versus $|\Delta\eta|$ = $|\eta_{\alpha}-\eta_{\beta}|$. Statistical errors are smaller than the symbol size. Systematic errors are given by the shaded bands and apply only to the difference of in-plane and out-of-plane parts.

(Color online) Three-point correlations split up into out-of-plane $(\langle sin(\Delta\phi_{\alpha}) sin(\Delta\phi_{\beta})\rangle)$ and in-plane $(\langle cos(\Delta\phi_{\alpha}) cos(\Delta\phi_{\beta})\rangle)$ composite parts for 40 − 60% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ GeV. (a)shows the correlations versus $\langle\eta\rangle$ = $(\eta_{\alpha}+\eta_{\beta})/2$. (b) shows the correlations versus $|\Delta\eta|$ = $|\eta_{\alpha}-\eta_{\beta}|$. Statistical errors are smaller than the symbol size. Systematic errors are given by the shaded bands and apply only to the difference of in-plane and out-of-plane parts.

(Color online) Three-point correlations split up into out-of-plane and in-plane composite parts for 40 − 60% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. (a) shows the correlatios versus $\langle p_{T}\rangle$ = $(p_{T,\alpha}+p_{T,\beta})/2$. (b) shows the correlations versus $|\Delta p_{T}|$ = $|p_{T,\alpha}-p_{T,\beta}|$. Statistical errors are smaller than the symbol size. Systematic errors are given by the shaded bands and apply only to the difference of in-plane and out-of-plane parts.

(Color online) Three-point correlations split up into out-of-plane and in-plane composite parts for 40 − 60% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. (a) shows the correlatios versus $\langle p_{T}\rangle$ = $(p_{T,\alpha}+p_{T,\beta})/2$. (b) shows the correlations versus $|\Delta p_{T}|$ = $|p_{T,\alpha}-p_{T,\beta}|$. Statistical errors are smaller than the symbol size. Systematic errors are given by the shaded bands and apply only to the difference of in-plane and out-of-plane parts.

Transverse mass dependence of Gaussian radii Rout, Rside and Rlong and of experimental values of the Gaussian fit parameter lambda for midrapidity kaon pairs from the 30% most central Au+Au collisions at sqrt(sNN)=200 GeV. The PHENIX datapoints of the plot in the paper are from Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 142301 (2009).

The elliptic flow $v_{2}$ of protons and anti-protons as a function of the transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions. The lower panels show the difference in $v_{2}(p_{T})$ between the particles and anti-particles. The solid curves are fits with a horizontal line. The shaded areas depict the magnitude of the systematic errors.

The elliptic flow $v_{2}$ of protons and anti-protons as a function of the transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions. The lower panels show the difference in $v_{2}(p_{T})$ between the particles and anti-particles. The solid curves are fits with a horizontal line. The shaded areas depict the magnitude of the systematic errors.

The elliptic flow $v_{2}$ of protons and anti-protons as a function of the transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions. The lower panels show the difference in $v_{2}(p_{T})$ between the particles and anti-particles. The solid curves are fits with a horizontal line. The shaded areas depict the magnitude of the systematic errors.

The elliptic flow $v_{2}$ of protons and anti-protons as a function of the transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions. The lower panels show the difference in $v_{2}(p_{T})$ between the particles and anti-particles. The solid curves are fits with a horizontal line. The shaded areas depict the magnitude of the systematic errors.

The elliptic flow $v_{2}$ of protons and anti-protons as a function of the transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions. The lower panels show the difference in $v_{2}(p_{T})$ between the particles and anti-particles. The solid curves are fits with a horizontal line. The shaded areas depict the magnitude of the systematic errors.

The difference in $v_{2}$ between particles $(X)$ and their corresponding anti-particles $(X)$ (see legend) as a function of $\sqrt(s_{NN})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions. The dashed lines in the plot are fits with a power-law function. The error bars depict the combined statistical and systematic errors.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

Comparison of dynamical $\langle p_{t}\rangle$ fluctuations in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 and 200 GeV as a function of the number of participanting nucleons.

(a) $p_{t}$ correlations, (b) $p_{t}$ correlations multiplied by $\langle N_{part}\rangle/2$, (c) square root of $p_{t}$ correlations scaled by $\langle\langle p_{t}\rangle\rangle$, and (d) square root of $p_{t}$ correlations multiplied by $\langle N_{part}\rangle/2$ and scaled by $\langle\langle p_{t}\rangle\rangle$, plotted vs. $\langle N_{part}\rangle$

(a) $p_{t}$ correlations, (b) $p_{t}$ correlations multiplied by $\langle N_{part}\rangle/2$, (c) square root of $p_{t}$ correlations scaled by $\langle\langle p_{t}\rangle\rangle$, and (d) square root of $p_{t}$ correlations multiplied by $\langle N_{part}\rangle/2$ and scaled by $\langle\langle p_{t}\rangle\rangle$, plotted vs. $\langle N_{part}\rangle$

(a) $p_{t}$ correlations, (b) $p_{t}$ correlations multiplied by $\langle N_{part}\rangle/2$, (c) square root of $p_{t}$ correlations scaled by $\langle\langle p_{t}\rangle\rangle$, and (d) square root of $p_{t}$ correlations multiplied by $\langle N_{part}\rangle/2$ and scaled by $\langle\langle p_{t}\rangle\rangle$, plotted vs. $\langle N_{part}\rangle$

Comparison of scaled $p_{t}$ correlations between data and models for Au+Au [panels (a) and (c)] and Cu+Cu [panels (b) and (d)] collisions at 200 GeV.

Comparison of scaled $p_{t}$ correlations between data and models for Au+Au [panels (a) and (c)] and Cu+Cu [panels (b) and (d)] collisions at 200 GeV.

$p_{t}$ correlations for varying rapidity acceptance ($|\eta|$ <0.25, 0.5, and 1.0) for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV [panel (a)] and 62.4 GeV [panel (b)].

$p_{t}$ correlations for varying azimuthal acceptance for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV [panels (a) and (c)] and 62.4 GeV [panels (b) and (d)].

$p_{t}$ correlations for varying azimuthal acceptance for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV [panels (a) and (c)] and 62.4 GeV [panels (b) and (d)].

$p_{t}$ correlations plotted as a function of $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ for different $p_{t}$ ranges in Cu+Cu collisions at (a) 200 GeV and (b) 62.4 GeV.

$p_{t}$ correlations plotted as a function of $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ for different $p_{t}$ ranges in Cu+Cu collisions at (a) 200 GeV and (b) 62.4 GeV.

Correlations for varying $p_{t}$ ranges for different model calculations in Cu+Cu 200 GeV. (a) AMPT (SM), (b) URQMD, and (c) Hijing (no JQ).

Uncorrected inclusive charged particle $p_{t}$ spectrum for 0%–10% collision centrality for Cu+Cu 200 GeV (open circles).

Correlations scaled by $(d\langle p_{t}\rangle/dT)^{2}T^{2}$ vs. $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ for different $p_{t}$ ranges in Cu+Cu 200 GeV.

Amplitude (A) as a function of centrality for Like Sign (LS) and Charge Independent (CI) particles for Au+Au collision at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The third harmonic coefficient as a function of pseudorapidity for 0-5% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The third harmonic coefficient as a function of pseudorapidity for 5-10% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The third harmonic coefficient as a function of pseudorapidity for 10-20% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The third harmonic coefficient as a function of pseudorapidity for 20-30% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The third harmonic coefficient as a function of pseudorapidity for 30-40% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The third harmonic coefficient as a function of pseudorapidity for 40-60% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The third harmonic coefficient as a function of transverse momentum for the wideGaussian method and for fhe event plane in the TPC for 0-5% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The third harmonic coefficient as a function of transverse momentum for the wideGaussian method and for fhe event plane in the TPC for 30-40% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The third harmonic coefficient as a function of transverse momentum for 0-10% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The third harmonic coefficient as a function of transverse momentum for 10-20% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The third harmonic coefficient as a function of transverse momentum for 20-30% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The third harmonic coefficient as a function of transverse momentum for 30-40% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The third harmonic coefficient as a function of transverse momentum for 40-50% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The third harmonic coefficient as a function of transverse momentum for 50-60% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The third harmonic coefficient as a function of centrality from different methods of analysis for Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The square of the third harmonic coefficient as a function of pseudorapidity separation (Deta) for Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The fourth power of the third harmonic coefficient from four-particle cumulants is plotted as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The ratio of the fourth power of the third harmonic coefficient from four-particle cumulants and the fourth power of the third harmonic flow is plotted as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The v_2{TPC} as a function of transverse momentum for 0-5% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The v_2{TPC} as a function of transverse momentum for 20-30% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The v_2{TPC} as a function of transverse momentum for 30-40% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The v_3{TPC} as a function of transverse momentum for 0-5% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The v_3{TPC} as a function of transverse momentum for 20-30% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The v_3{TPC} as a function of transverse momentum for 30-40% centrality Au+Au collisions at sqrt(snn)=200 GEV.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow,v_2, as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T, from 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for various particle species and energies.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected particles re plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< pT<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p__T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2 (p_T), in 0–80% central Au+Au collisions for selected anti-particles are plotted only for the transverse momentum range of 0.2< p_T<1.6 GeV/c to emphasize the mass ordering at low p_T.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged pions as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged pions as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions. Different ∆v_2 ranges were used for the upper and lower panels.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged pions as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged pions as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions Different ∆v_2 ranges were used for the upper and lower panels.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged pions as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged pions as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions. Different ∆v_2 ranges were used for the upper and lower panels.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged pions as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged pions as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions. Different ∆v_2 ranges were used for the upper and lower panels.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged pions as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged pions as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions. Different ∆v_2 ranges were used for the upper and lower panels.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged pions as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged pions as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions. Different ∆v_2 ranges were used for the upper and lower panels.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged kaons as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged kaons as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged kaons as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions. Different ∆v_2 ranges were used for the upper and lower panels.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged kaons as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged kaons as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged kaons as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions. Different ∆v_2 ranges were used for the upper and lower panels.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged kaons as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged kaons as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged koans as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions. Different ∆v_2 ranges were used for the upper and lower panels.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged kaons as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged kaons as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged koans as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions. Different ∆v_2 ranges were used for the upper and lower panels.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged koans as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged koans as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged koans as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions. Different ∆v_2 ranges were used for the upper and lower panels.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged koans as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged koans as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of charged koans as a function of the transverse momentum,p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions. Different ∆v_2 ranges were used for the upper and lower panels.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of p, $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of p, $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of p, $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions

The elliptic flow,v_2 of p, $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of p, $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of p, $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of p, $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of p, $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of p, $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of p, $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of p, $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of p, $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Lambda$ and $\overline{\Lambda}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au. collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Lambda$ and $\overline{\Lambda}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au. collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Lambda$ and $\overline{\Lambda}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au. collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Lambda$ and $\overline{\Lambda}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au. collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Lambda$ and $\overline{\Lambda}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au. collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Lambda$ and $\overline{\Lambda}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au. collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Lambda$ and $\overline{\Lambda}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au. collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Lambda$ and $\overline{\Lambda}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au. collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Lambda$ and $\overline{\Lambda}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au. collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Lambda$ and $\overline{\Lambda}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au. collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Lambda$ and $\overline{\Lambda}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Lambda$ and $\overline{\Lambda}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Xi^{-}$ and $\overline{\Xi^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Xi^{-}$ and $\overline{\Xi^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Xi^{-}$ and $\overline{\Xi^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Xi^{-}$ and $\overline{\Xi^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Xi^{-}$ and $\overline{\Xi^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Xi^{-}$ and $\overline{\Xi^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Xi^{-}$ and $\overline{\Xi^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Xi^{-}$ and $\overline{\Xi^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Xi^{-}$ and $\overline{\Xi^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Xi^{-}$ and $\overline{\Xi^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Xi^{-}$ and $\overline{\Xi^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $\Xi^{-}$ and $\overline{\Xi^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $Omega^{-}$ and $\overline{\Omega^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $Omega^{-}$ and $\overline{\Omega^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $Omega^{-}$ and $\overline{\Omega^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $Omega^{-}$ and $\overline{\Omega^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $Omega^{-}$ and $\overline{\Omega^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $Omega^{-}$ and $\overline{\Omega^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $Omega^{-}$ and $\overline{\Omega^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $Omega^{-}$ and $\overline{\Omega^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $Omega^{-}$ and $\overline{\Omega^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of $Omega^{-}$ and $\overline{\Omega^{+}}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of Λ,Λbar as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions

The elliptic flow,v_2, of $\phi$ mesons as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of $\phi$ mesons as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of $\phi$ mesons as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of $\phi$ mesons as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of $\phi$ mesons as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of $\phi$ mesons as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–10% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–10% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–10% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–10% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–10% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–10% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–10% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–10% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–10% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–10% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–10% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 0–10% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 10–40% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 10–40% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 10–40% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 10–40% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 10–40% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 10–40% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 10–40% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 10–40% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2 of Λ,Λbar as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T,for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 10–40% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 10–40% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 10–40% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 40–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 40–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 40–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 40–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 40–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 40–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 40–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 40–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 40–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 40–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 40–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow, v_2, of p and $\overline{p}$ as a function of the transverse momentum, p_T, for 40–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The elliptic flow,v_2, of 0–80% central Au+Au collisions as a function of the reduced transverse mass,$ m_T−m_0 $, for selected anti-particles.

The difference in the v_2 values between a particle X and its corresponding anti-particle $\overline{X}$ as a function of √sNN for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The difference in the v_2 values between a particle X and its corresponding anti-particle $\overline{X}$ as a function of √sNN for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The difference in the v_2 values between a particle X and its corresponding anti-particle $\overline{X}$ as a function of √sNN for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The difference in the v_2 values between a particle X and its corresponding anti-particle $\overline{X}$ as a function of √sNN for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The difference in the v_2 values between a particle X and its corresponding anti-particle $\overline{X}$ as a function of √sNN for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The difference in the v_2 values between a particle X and its corresponding anti-particle $\overline{X}$ as a function of $μ_B$ for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The difference in the v_2 values between a particle X and its corresponding anti-particle $\overline{X}$ as a function of $μ_B$ for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The difference in the v_2 values between a particle X and its corresponding anti-particle $\overline{X}$ as a function of $μ_B$ for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The difference in the v_2 values between a particle X and its corresponding anti-particle $\overline{X}$ as a function of $μ_B$ for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The difference in the v_2 values between a particle X and its corresponding anti-particle $\overline{X}$ as a function of $μ_B$ for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions.

The proton and anti-proton elliptic flow for 0–80% central Au+Au collisions at √sNN= 19.6 GeV, where “(+,-) EP” refers to the event plane reconstructed using all of the charged particles and “(-) EP” refers to the event plane reconstructed using only the negatively charged particles.

Projections of 2-D correlation functions on $\Delta \phi$ (a) (with $|\Delta \eta|$ < 1.0) and $\Delta \eta$ (b) (with $|\Delta \phi|$ < 0.7) for the hadrons associated with their respective triggers (T1 for near-side, T2 for away–side) are shown for d+Au (circles) and central 0-20% Au+Au (squares) data.

Projections of 2-D correlation functions on $\Delta \phi$ (a) (with $|\Delta \eta|$ < 1.0) and $\Delta \eta$ (b) (with $|\Delta \phi|$ < 0.7) for the hadrons associated with their respective triggers (T1 for near-side, T2 for away–side) are shown for d+Au (circles) and central 0-20% Au+Au (squares) data.

Projections of 2-D correlation functions on $\Delta \phi$ (a) (with $|\Delta \eta|$ < 1.0) and $\Delta \eta$ (b) (with $|\Delta \phi|$ < 0.7) for the hadrons associated with their respective triggers (T1 for near-side, T2 for away–side) are shown for d+Au (circles) and central 0-20% Au+Au (squares) data.

The relative di-jet energy imbalance estimate $\Delta(\Sigma E_{T})^{Au+Au}-\Delta(\Sigma E_{T})^{d+Au}$.

Conditional di-jet survival probability measured through di-jet relative suppression rates $I_{d+Au}^{Au+Au}$ as a function of centrality.

(Color online.) $J/\psi$ RAA versus pT for several centrality bins for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The statistical (systematic) uncertainties are shown with vertical bars (open boxes). The filled boxes about unity on the right show the size of the normalization uncertainty. PHENIX low-$p_{T}$ $J/\psi$ results [6] and STAR high-$p_{T}$ results in Cu+Cu collisions [15] are shown for comparison. The curves are from the predictions by Model I (Liu et al.) [11] and Model II (Zhao et al.) [12].

(Color online) $R_{AA}$ versus $N_{part}$ for high-$p_{T}$ $J/\psi$ in comparison with a) low-$p_{T}$ $J/\psi$ data from PHENIX [6], and high-$p_{T}$ $\pi^{\pm}$ from STAR [41, 42], and b) high-$p_{T}$ $J/\psi$ from CMS [8]. The statistical (systematic) uncertainties are shown in vertical bars (boxes). The shaded green band about unity shows the systematic uncertainties from $N_{bin}$ and the box about unity on the right shows the $R_{AA}$ normalization uncertainty from the statistical and global systematic uncertainties of the $p+p$ reference data. The percentage in the top horizontal axis of (a) and (b) refer to the collision centrality for high-$p_{T}$ $J/\psi$ data at the RHIC and LHC, respectively.

The $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ for 20-30% central Au + Au collisions at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV.

$\varepsilon$ (Glauber) as a function of $p_T$ for various collision centralities (10-20%, 30-40% and 50-60%) in Au + Au collisions at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV.

$\varepsilon$ (CGC) as a function of $p_T$ for various collision centralities (10-20%, 30-40% and 50-60%) in Au + Au collisions at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV.

$v_2${EtaSubs} as a function of $p_T$ for various collision centralities (10-20%, 30-40% and 50-60%) in Au + Au collisions at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV.

The $v_2${EP} vs. $\eta$ for 10-40% centrality in Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV.

The $v_2${EP} vs. $\eta$ for 10-40% centrality in Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

The $v_2${4} vs. $p_T$ at midrapidity for various collision energies ($\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV).

The $v_2${4} vs. $p_T$ at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

The $v_2${4} vs. $p_T$ at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

(color online) $A_{N}$ as a function of the corrected mean $p_{T}$ for 2006 transverse data. The panels present $A_{N}$ for four different $\eta$ bins. $A_{N}$ is the left-right single-spin asymmetry for a transversely polarized beam. The errors shown combine the statistical uncertainties, which dominate, with all systematic uncertainties except trigger and reconstruction bias. See Sect. V A for a discussion of the latter.

(color online) $A_{\Sigma}$ versus corrected mean $p_{T}$ for 2006 transverse data, averaged over the range $|\eta|$ < 0.8$. A_{\Sigma}$, the transverse double-spin asymmetry for transversely polarized beams, is defined in more detail in the text.

(color online) Measured transverse double-spin asymmetry versus azimuthal angle $\phi$ for 2006 transverse data. The points are fit with the function $A_{\sigma}+A_{TT}cos(2\phi)$. These data are averaged over $7.5<p_{T}<40$ GeV/c and $|\eta|<0.8$.

(color online) $A_{LL}$ for inclusive jet production versus corrected jet $p_{T}$ for 2005 data. For 2005 data we used a cone radius equal to 0.4 and a pseudorapidity range for the jet thrust axis of $0.2<\eta<0.8$. The error bars are statistical. The gray boxes show the systematic uncertainties.

(color online) $A_{LL}$ for inclusive jet production versus corrected jet $p_{T}$ for 2006 data. For 2006 data we used a jet cone radius equal to 0.7 and a pseudorapidity range of $−0.7<\eta<0.9$ to reflect the increased detector coverage. The error bars are statistical. The gray boxes show the systematic uncertainties.

$A_N$ vs. $x_F$ at average pseudorapidity of 3.68 for $\pi^0$ and $\eta$. Also shown are the previously published results for $\pi^0$ at lower $x_F$ , derived from the same data set but without the center cut [12]. The error bars are statistical uncertainties only. The error boxes indicate the systematic uncertainties.