Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$ relative to their SM prediction from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also shown.

Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to WW)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{WW}$ from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The values involving cross sections are given for $\sqrt{s}$=8 TeV, assuming the SM values for $\sigma_i(7 \mathrm{TeV})/\sigma_i(8 \mathrm{TeV})$. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also shown.

Best fit values of $\sigma(gg\to H\to WW)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{WW}$ relative to their SM prediction from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also shown.

Best fit values of $\kappa_{gZ}= \kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z} / \kappa_{H}$ and of the ratios of coupling modifiers, as defined in the most generic parameterisation described in the context of the $\kappa$ framework, from the combined analysis of the $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS and also separately for each experiment, together with their total uncertainties and their breakdown into the four components described in the text. The uncertainties in $\lambda_{tg}$ and $\lambda_{WZ}$, for which a negative solution is allowed, are calculated around the overall best fit value. The expected total uncertainties in the measurements are also shown. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Measured global signal strength $\mu$ and its total uncertainty, together with the breakdown of the uncertainty into its four components as defined in the text. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and separately for each experiment. The expected uncertainty, with its breakdown, is also shown.

Measured signal strengths $\mu$ and their total uncertainties for different Higgs boson production processes. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and separately for each experiment, for the combined $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also displayed. These results are obtained assuming that the Higgs boson branching fractions are the same as in the SM.

Measured signal strengths $\mu$ and their total uncertainties for different Higgs boson decay channels. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, and separately for each experiment, for the combined $\sqrt{s}$=7 and 8 TeV data. The expected uncertainties in the measurements are also displayed. These results are obtained assuming that the Higgs boson production process cross sections at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 and 8 TeV are the same as in the SM.

Results of the ten-parameter fit of $\mu_F^f = \mu_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}^f$ and $\mu_V^f = \mu_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}^f$ for each of the five decay channels. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, together with their measured and expected uncertainties. The measured results are also shown separately for each experiment.

Results of the six-parameter fit of the global ratio $\mu_V/\mu_F = \mu_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}/\mu_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$ together with $\mu_F^f$ for each of the five decay channels. The results are shown for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, together with their measured and expected uncertainties. The measured results are also shown separately for each experiment.

Fit results allowing BSM loop couplings, assuming that $|\kappa_{V}| \le$ 1, where $\kappa_{V}$ denotes $\kappa_{Z}$ or $\kappa_{W}$, and that $\mathrm{B_{BSM}} \ge$ 0. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. For the parameters with both signs allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ interval is shown on a second line. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Fit results allowing BSM loop couplings, assuming that there are no additional BSM contributions to the Higgs boson width, i.e. $\mathrm{B_{BSM}}=0$. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. For the parameters with both signs allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ interval is shown on a second line. When a parameter is constrained and reaches a boundary, namely $\mathrm{B_{BSM}}$ = 0, the uncertainty is not indicated. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Fit results for the parameterisation assuming the absence of BSM particles in the loops ($\mathrm{B_{BSM}}$=0). The results with their measured and expected uncertainties are reported for the combination of ATLAS and CMS, together with the individual results from each experiment. For the parameters with both signs allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ CL interval is shown on a second line. When a parameter is constrained and reaches a boundary, namely $|\kappa_\mu|$ = 0, the uncertainty is not indicated. For those parameters with no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown.

Summary of fit results for a parameterisation probing the ratios of coupling modifiers for up-type versus down-type fermions. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported together with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. The parameter $\kappa_{uu}$ is positive definite since $\kappa_H$ is always assumed to be positive. For the parameter $\lambda_{du}$, for which both signs are allowed, the other 1$\sigma$ CL interval is shown on a second line. Negative values for the parameter $\lambda_{Vu}$ are excluded by more than 4$\sigma$.

Summary of fit results for a parameterisation probing the ratios of coupling modifiers for leptons versus quarks. The results for the combination of ATLAS and CMS are reported together with their measured and expected uncertainties. Also shown are the results from each experiment. The parameter $\kappa_{qq}$ is positive definite since $\kappa_H$ is always assumed to be positive. For the parameter $\lambda_{lq}$, for which there is no sensitivity to the sign, only the absolute values are shown. Negative values for the parameter $\lambda_{Vq}$ are excluded by more than 4$\sigma$.

Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with 23 parameters, $\sigma_i\cdot\mathrm{B}^f$ for each specific channel $i\to H\to f$. Only 20 parameters are shown because the other three, corresponding to the $H\to ZZ$ decay channel for the $WH$, $ZH$, and $ttH$ production processes, are not measured with a meaningful precision.

Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with nine parameters, $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$.

Correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining the ATLAS and CMS data using the generic parameterisation with seven parameters, $\kappa_{gZ}=\kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z} / \kappa_{H}$ and the ratios of coupling modifiers.

Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with 23 parameters, $\sigma_i\cdot\mathrm{B}^f$ for each specific channel $i\to H\to f$. Only 20 parameters are shown because the other three, corresponding to the $H\to ZZ$ decay channel for the $WH$, $ZH$, and $ttH$ production processes, are not measured with a meaningful precision.

Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with nine parameters, $\sigma(gg\to H\to ZZ)$, $\sigma_i/\sigma_{gg\mathrm{F}}$, and $\mathrm{B}^f/\mathrm{B}^{ZZ}$.

Expected correlation matrix obtained from the fit combining ATLAS and CMS pre-fit Asimov data sets using the generic parameterisation with seven parameters, $\kappa_{gZ}=\kappa_{g}\cdot\kappa_{Z} / \kappa_{H}$ and the ratios of coupling modifiers.

ATLAS+CMS combined best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.

ATLAS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.

CMS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{g}$,$\kappa_{\gamma}$) plane.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel.

ATLAS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.

CMS best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% CL negative log-likelihood contour in the ($\kappa_{F}$,$\kappa_{V}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel, assuming $\kappa_{F}>0$.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow WW$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ channel.

Best-fit and 68% and 95% CL negative log-likelihood contours in the ($\mu^{f}_{gg\mathrm{F}+ttH}$,$\mu^{f}_{\mathrm{VBF}+VH}$) plane for the $H\rightarrow bb$ channel.

The test statistic q as a function of $\mu_{\mathrm{ttH}}$ for all decay modes at 7+8 TeV and at 13 TeV, separately, and for all decay modes at all CM energies. The expected SM result for the overall combination is also shown.

The expected and observed constraints on chargino lifetime and mass. The ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs doublets, $\tan \beta$, is fixed to 5 with $\mu > 0$, where $\mu$ is the higgsino mass parameter. The direct chargino production cross section includes both $\widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}$ and $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ production in roughly a 2:1 ratio for all chargino masses considered, and the branching fraction of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\mathrm{\pi^{\pm}}$ is set to 100%. Chargino masses that are less than those on the curve are excluded at 95% CL.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section for direct production of charginos and their branching fraction to $\widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\mathrm{\pi^{\pm}}$ as a function of chargino mass and lifetime. The ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs doublets, $\tan \beta$, is fixed to 5 with $\mu > 0$, where $\mu$ is the higgsino mass parameter. The direct chargino production cross section includes both $\widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}$ and $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ production in roughly a 2:1 ratio for all chargino masses considered, and the branching fraction of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\mathrm{\pi^{\pm}}$ is set to 100%.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2015 data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016A data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016B data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2015 data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016A data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016B data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Predicted signal yields for the 2015 data-taking period, corresponding to $2.7\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each of the disappearing track selections for three chargino lifetime hypotheses ($\tau = 0.3$, $3.3$, and $33\,\text{ns}{}$) with a chargino mass of $700\,\text{GeV}{}$. The selections listed are cumulative, i.e., only the events and objects passing a given selection are considered in subsequent selections. The uncertainties shown include only the statistical uncertainty resulting from the limited sizes of the generated samples.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016A data-taking period, corresponding to $8.3\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each of the disappearing track selections for three chargino lifetime hypotheses ($\tau = 0.3$, $3.3$, and $33\,\text{ns}{}$) with a chargino mass of $700\,\text{GeV}{}$. The selections listed are cumulative, i.e., only the events and objects passing a given selection are considered in subsequent selections. The uncertainties shown include only the statistical uncertainty resulting from the limited sizes of the generated samples.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016B data-taking period, corresponding to $27.4\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each of the disappearing track selections for three chargino lifetime hypotheses ($\tau = 0.3$, $3.3$, and $33\,\text{ns}{}$) with a chargino mass of $700\,\text{GeV}{}$. The selections listed are cumulative, i.e., only the events and objects passing a given selection are considered in subsequent selections. The uncertainties shown include only the statistical uncertainty resulting from the limited sizes of the generated samples.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, for $D^{0}$ mesons as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $D^{0}$ mesons as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $D^{0}$ meson as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $D^{0}$ meson as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV.

The ratio of pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for dijets in the range $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV.

The ratio of theory to data, for the ratio of the pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV. The total uncertainties on the data points are provided in the column entitled 'DATA UNCERTAINTIES'. The theory points are from the NLO pQCD calculations of DSSZ, EPS09, nCTEQ15, and EPPS16 nPDFs, using CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The ratio of theory to data, for the ratio of the pPb to pp $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV. The total uncertainties on the data points are provided in the column entitled 'DATA UNCERTAINTIES'. The theory points are from the NLO pQCD calculations of DSSZ, EPS09, nCTEQ15, and EPPS16 nPDFs, using CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV.

The measured pp dijet pseudorapidity spectra, shifted to match the $\eta_{\mathrm{dijet}}$ range of the pPb collisions, for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV using the CT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $55 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 75$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $75 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 95$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $95 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 115$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $115 < p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} < 150$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

The measured pPb dijet pseudorapidity spectra for $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ave}} > 150$ GeV using the MMHT14 as the baseline PDF.

MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) in PP collision

MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%