Bruneton, C.
Inclusive
[2.0, 3.0]
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 10 of 58 results

Measurement of the Neutrino - Nucleon Anti-neutrino - Nucleon Total Cross-sections

Eichten, T. ; Faissner, H. ; Hasert, F.J. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 46 (1973) 274-280, 1973.
Inspire Record 84484 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.28054

The v and v nucleon total cross-sections have been determined as a function of energy using a sample of 2500 v and 950 v event. The results are compared with predictions of scaling and charge symmetry hypotheses.

2 data tables
Table 1

Measured charged current total cross section.

Table 2

Measured charged current total cross section.


New measurement of the total cross-section in proton proton scattering in pure spin states

de Boer, W. ; Fernow, Richard C. ; Krisch, A.D. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 34 (1975) 558-559, 1975.
Inspire Record 107097 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.3352

We have remeasured the total cross section for proton-proton scattering at 2-6 GeV/c in the spin states ↑↑ and ↑↓ perpendicular to the beam direction. With the reduced errors significant differences were found between the two cross sections.

2 data tables
Table 1

DIFFERENCE OF TOTAL CROSS SECTIONS FOR ANTIPARALLEL AND PARALLEL SPINS PERPENDICULAR TO THE BEAM DIRECTION.

Table 2

No description provided.


rivet Analysis
Inclusive K0(s) Production in e+ e- Annihilation at Energies of 3.6-GeV to 5.0-GeV

The PLUTO collaboration Burmester, J. ; Criegee, L. ; Dehne, H.C. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 67 (1977) 367-370, 1977.
Inspire Record 118873 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.27568

We have measured the production cross section for K s 0 in e + e − annihilation from 3.6 to 5.0 GeV center of mass energy. A substantial increase of the K s 0 yield is observed around 4 GeV in qualitative agreement with the charm hypothesis.

4 data tables
Table 1

THE DATA GIVEN HERE AT 9.3 GEV AND ABOVE ARE REPORTED IN C. BERGER ET AL., PL 104B, 79 (1981). THE 12.0 AND 30 GEV DATA WERE TAKEN AT PETRA.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

Total Cross-section for Neutrino Charged Current Interactions at 3-{GeV} and 9-{GeV}

The Gargamelle Neutrino Propane & Aachen-Brussels-CERN-Ecole Poly-Orsay-Padua collaborations Ciampolillo, S. ; Degrange, B. ; Dewit, M. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 84 (1979) 281-284, 1979.
Inspire Record 141175 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.27322

Average total cross sections are given for neutrino charged current interactions at neutrino energies of 2.87 GeV and 9.05 GeV. The ratios 〈σ〉 〈E〉 are 0.69 ± 0.05 and 0.61 ± 0.06 in units of 10 −38 cm 2 /GeV nucleon, respectively The errors include both statistical and systematic uncertainties.

2 data tables
Table 1

Measured charged current total cross section.

Table 2

Measured charged current total cross section.


CROSS-SECTIONS AND SCALING VARIABLE DISTRIBUTIONS OF NEUTRAL AND CHARGED CURRENT NEUTRINO NUCLEON INTERACTIONS FROM A LOW-ENERGY NARROW BAND BEAM

Baltay, C. ; French, H. ; Hibbs, M. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 44 (1980) 916-919, 1980.
Inspire Record 157494 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20725

This Letter compares neutral-current and charged-current scaling-variable distributions in neutrino-nucleon interactions induced by a narrow-band beam at Brookhaven National Laboratory; the x distribution of neutral-current events has been reported previously. The first measurement of flux-normalized neutrino cross sections from a narrow-band beam in the energy range Eν=3−9 GeV is also presented.

1 data table
Table 1

Measured charged current total cross section.


INELASTIC ELECTRON PHOTON SCATTERING AT MODERATE FOUR MOMENTUM TRANSFERS

The PLUTO collaboration Berger, Christoph ; Genzel, H. ; Grigull, R. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 99 (1981) 287-291, 1981.
Inspire Record 155594 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.27125

We present new high statistics data on hadron production in photon-photon reactions. The data are analyzed in terms of an electron-photon scattering formalism. The dependence of the total cross section of Q 2 , the four-momentum transfer squared of the scattered electron, and on the mass W of the hadronic system is investigated. The data are compared to predictions from Vector-Meson Dominance and the quark model.

3 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

DEPENDENCE ON VISIBLE HADRONIC INVARIANT MASS.

Table 3

Data read from graph.


Limit on the B ---> u Coupling from Semileptonic B Decay

The CLEO collaboration Chen, A. ; Goldberg, M. ; Horwitz, N. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 52 (1984) 1084, 1984.
Inspire Record 199380 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20474

We have used the momentum spectrum of leptons produced in semileptonic B-meson decays to set a 90%-confidence-level upper limit on Γ(b→ulν)Γ(b→clν) of 4%. We also measure the semileptonic branching fractions of the B meson to be (12.0±0.7±0.5)% for electrons and (10.8±0.6±1.0)% for muons.

2 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.


A Precise Determination of the Electroweak Mixing Angle from Semileptonic Neutrino Scattering

The CHARM collaboration Allaby, J.V. ; Amaldi, U. ; Barbiellini, G. ; et al.
Z.Phys.C 36 (1987) 611, 1987.
Inspire Record 249672 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.15697

The cross-section ratio of neutral-current and charged-current semileptonic interactions of muon-neutrinos on isoscalar nuclei has been measured with the result:Rv=0.3093±0.0031 for hadronic energy larger than 4 GeV. From this ratio we determined the electroweak mixing angle sin2θW, wheremc is the charm-quark mass in GeV/c2. Comparison with direct measurements ofmw andmz determines the radiative shift of the intermediate boson mass Δr=0.077±0.025(exp.)±0.038(syst.), in agreement with the prediction. Assuming the validity of the electroweak standard theory we determined ϱ=0.990−0.013(mc−1.5)±0.009(exp.)±0.003(theor.).

3 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

STATISTICAL ERROR IN THE VALUE CITED IS REDUCING, WHEN CUT IS MORE STRINGENT?.


Polarization at Small Angles in Anti-proton - Carbon Elastic Scattering at {LEAR} Energies

The SING collaboration Martin, A. ; Birsa, R. ; Bos, K. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.A 487 (1988) 563-590, 1988.
Inspire Record 261245 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.37001

A double-scattering experiment of antiprotons on carbon has been carried out at the Low-Energy Antiproton Ring (LEAR) at CERN, to measure the polarization parameter A p C in antiproton-carbon elastic scattering at small angles. The polarization parameter has been inferred from the azimuthal distribution of the antiprotons after the second scattering. Data have also been collected with a liquid-hydrogen target as the second scatterer, thus allowing the sign of A p C to be determined. The experiment has been performed at two momenta of the extracted antiproton beam, 800 and 1100 MeV/c. A small positive value of the polarization has been observed, compatible with energy independence and a linear increase with the momentum transfer q . Parametrizing A p C as a c q , we get a c = +0.72 0.10 +0.09 ( GeV / c ) −1 . This result is compared with potential model predictions for N̄N amplitudes through a Glauber theory calculation.

6 data tables
Table 1

THETA1(RF=LAB)=8 DEG, THETA POINTED IN TABLE IS THE SECOND SCATTERING ANGLE.

Table 2

THETA1(RF=LAB)=5 DEG, THETA POINTED IN TABLE IS THE SECOND SCATTERING ANGLE.

Table 3

THETA1(RF=LAB)=8 DEG, THETA POINTED IN TABLE IS THE SECOND SCATTERING ANGLE.

More…

Two Jet Differential Cross-Section in anti-p p Collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV

The CDF collaboration Abe, F. ; Amidei, D. ; Apollinari, G. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 64 (1990) 157, 1990.
Inspire Record 283353 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.19998

The two-jet differential cross section d3σ(p¯p→jet 1+jet 2+X)/dEtdη1dη2, averaged over -0.6≤η1≤0.6, at √s =1.8 TeV, has been measured in the Collider Detector at Fermilab. The predictions of leading-order quantum chromodynamics for most choices of structure functions show agreement with the data.

6 data tables
Table 1

Systematic error contains all known systematic uncertainties, including the effect of uncertainties in the energy scale.

Table 2

Systematic error contains all known systematic uncertainties, including the effect of uncertainties in the energy scale.

Table 3

Systematic error contains all known systematic uncertainties, including the effect of uncertainties in the energy scale.

More…