Data on Λ and\(\bar \Lambda \) polarization inK±p interactions at 32 GeV/c are presented. A comparison is made between the results of these two experiments as well as with the data at lower energies. The contribution of the different production mechanisms to the Λ(\(\bar \Lambda \)) polarization are discussed.
Data are presented on figures only. DATA NOT ENCODED.
No description provided.
TheA-dependence of the polarization ofΛ0,s produced inclusively in neutron-nucleus interactions at a mean neutron momentum of about 40 GeV/c has been measured in an experiment performed using the BIS-2 spectrometer at the Serpukhov accelerator. Carbon, Aluminium and Copper targets were used. TheΛ0,s were produced in the kinematical region of 0.6<pT<1.3 GeV/c and 0.2<xF<0.9. Describing the polarization of theΛ0,s by ℘=a·A a value of (−0.15+0.07/−0.60) was obtained by a fit to our data.
POLARIZATION IS DESCRIBED BY A POWER LOW: POL = C*A**B, WHERE C = -1.1, +0.4, -0.3 , A- ATOMIC NUMBER AND B = -0.15, +0.07, -0.6.
.
None
No description provided.
No description provided.
None
No description provided.
No description provided.
None
(C=EXP1) and (C=EXP2) correspond to two different method of event's registration. See text for details.
(C=EXP1) and (C=EXP2) correspond to two different method of event's registration. See text for details. Quasielastic events.
(C=EXP1) and (C=EXP2) correspond to two different method of event's registration. See text for details. Quasielastic events.
None
No description provided.
No description provided.
No description provided.
None
THE ASYMMETRY SIGMA HAS BEEN DETERMINED BY THE FORMULA: D(SIG)/D(OMEGA)=D(SIG0)/D(OMEGA)*(1+P*SIGMA*COS(PHI)), WHERE D(SIG0)/D(OMEGA) - CROSS SECTION ON U NPOLARIZED PHOTON BEAM, P - BEAM POLARIZATION, PHI - ASIMUTHAL ANGLE BETWEEN POLARIZATION VECTOR OF BEAM AND THE PLANE OF THE REACTION.
Experimental results are presented for the pp elastic-scattering single spin observable Aoono=Aooon=AN=P, or the analyzing power, at 19 beam kinetic energies between 1795 and 2235 MeV. The typical c.m. angular range is 60–100°. The measurements were performed at Saturne II with a vertically polarized beam and target (transverse to the beam direction and scattering plane), a magnetic spectrometer and a recoil detector, both instrumented with multiwire proportional chambers, and beam polarimeters.
Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 1.795 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.106 and 0.003.
Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 1.845 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.068 and 0.001.
Measurement values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 1.935 GeV. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.091 and 0.003.
Measurements at 18 beam kinetic energies between 1975 and 2795 MeV and at 795 MeV are reported for the pp elastic-scattering single spin parameter Aooon=Aoono=AN=P. The c.m. angular range is typically 60–100°. These results are compared to previous data from Saturne II and other accelerators. A search for energy-dependent structure at fixed c.m. angles is performed, but no rapid changes are observed.
Measured values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 0.795 GeV. Therelative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.018 and 0.0007.
Measured values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 1.975 GeV. Therelative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.045 and 0.002.
Measured values of the P P analysing power at kinetic energy 2.035 GeV fromrun I. The relative and additive systematic errors are +- 0.044 and 0.002.
Results of systematic measurements of the asymmetry parameter in the elastic scattering of pions on polarized protons at 1.4–2.1 GeV/ c in the backward hemisphere are presented together with a test of the isospin invariance of the data set available on pion-proton scattering in the investigated momentum range. The transversity isodoublet amplitudes at 1.98 and 2.07 GeV/ c are reconstructed. The obtained data, the isospin analysis and amplitude reconstruction results are compared with the current phase-shift analysis predictions.
No description provided.