Date

Measurement of the Form Factors for the Decay $D_s^+ \to \phi \mu^+ \nu$

The E687 collaboration Frabetti, P.L. ; Cheung, H.W.K. ; Cumalat, John P. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 328 (1994) 187-192, 1994.
Inspire Record 372405 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.42502

The fermilab high-energy photoproduction experiment E687 provides a sample of approximately 90 events of the decay mode D + s → φμ + ν . The ratios of the form factors governing the decay are measured to be R v =1.8±0.9±0.2 and R 2 = 1.1±0.8±0.1, implying a polarization of Г 1 /Г t = 1.0±0.5±0.1 for the electron decay, consistent with our measurement of the form factor for the decay D + → K ∗0 μ + ν .

1 data table

With a vetor meson in the final state, there are four formfactors, V(Q2), A1(Q2), A2(Q2), A3(Q2). Charge conjugated states are understood.


Measurement of the magnetic form factor of the neutron

Markowitz, P. ; Finn, J.M. ; Anderson, B.D. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.C 48 (1993) R5-R9, 1993.
Inspire Record 363009 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.26000

The H2(e,e’n)1H quasielastic cross section was measured at Q2 values of 0.109, 0.176, and 0.255 (GeV/c)2. The neutron detection efficiency was determined by the associated particle technique with the H2(γ,pn) reaction for each of the three neutron kinetic energies. These H2(e,e’n) measurements of the coincidence cross sections are the first at low Q2. The cross sections are sensitive primarily to the neutron magnetic form factor GMn at these kinematics. The extracted GMn values have smaller uncertainties than previous data and are consistent with the dipole parametrization at the two higher momentum transfers; at the lowest momentum transfer, the value of GMn is ∼10% higher than the dipole value.

1 data table

No description provided.


Measurements of elastic electron - proton scattering at large momentum transfer

Sill, A.F. ; Arnold, R.G. ; Bosted, Peter E. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 48 (1993) 29-55, 1993.
Inspire Record 341324 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.22584

Measurements of the forward-angle differential cross section for elastic electron-proton scattering were made in the range of momentum transfer from Q2=2.9 to 31.3 (GeV/c)2 using an electron beam at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. The data span six orders of magnitude in cross section. Combinded statistical and systematic uncertainties in the cross section measurements ranged from 3.6% at low Q2 to 19% at high Q2. These data have been used to extract the proton magnetic form factor GMp(Q2) and Dirac form factor F1p(Q2) by using form factor scaling. The logarithmic falloff of Q4F1p expected from leading twist predictions of perturbative quantum chromodynamics is consistent with the new data at high Q2. Some nonperturbative and hybrid calculations also agree with our results.

2 data tables

No description provided.

Formfactor scaling assumes (Ge=Gm/mu).


A Measurement of the pi0, eta and eta-prime electromagnetic form-factors

The CELLO collaboration Behrend, H.J. ; Criegee, L. ; Field, J.H. ; et al.
Z.Phys.C 49 (1991) 401-410, 1991.
Inspire Record 299282 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.45172

We present measurement of the π0γ*γ, ηγ*γ and η′γ*γ form factors. The π0-form factor is for the first time observed in the space-like region. The transition form factor of the η-meson is determined from its decay modes π+π−π0, π+π−γ and the neutral decay mode γγ. The decay of the η′ is observed in the decay channels ργ, ηπ+π− with η→γγ and in the four charged prong final state stemming from ηπ+π− with the η decaying into π+π−(π0/γ). All form factors agree well with a simple ρ-pole predicted by the vector meson dominance model and also with the QCD inspired Brodsky-Lepage model.

4 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…

A STUDY OF e+ e- ANNIHILATION IN THE 1400-MeV TO 2250-MeV ENERGY RANGE WITH THE MAGNETIC DETECTOR DM2 AT DCI

Augustin, J.E. ; Ayach, L. ; Calcaterra, A. ; et al.
LAL-83-21, 1983.
Inspire Record 192321 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.13242

None

5 data tables

ASSUMING ABS(GE)=ABS(GM).

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…

Measurement of proton and neutron electromagnetic form-factors at squared four momentum transfers up to 3-GeV/c$^2$

Bartel, W. ; Busser, F.W. ; Dix, W.r. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.B 58 (1973) 429-475, 1973.
Inspire Record 83685 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.69173

Electron-proton elastic scattering cross sections have been measured at squared four-momentum transfers q 2 of 0.67, 1.00, 1.17, 1.50, 1.75, 2.33 and 3.00 (GeV/ c ) 2 and Electron scattering angles θ e between 10° and 20° and at about 86° in the laboratory. The proton electromagnetic form factors G E p and G M p were determined. The results indicate that G E p ( q 2 ) decreases faster with increasing q 2 than G M p ( q 2 ). Quasi-elastic electron-deuteron cross sections have been determined at values of q 2 = 0.39, 0.565, 0.78, 1.0 and 1.5 (GeV/ c ) 2 and scattering angles between 10° and 12°. At q 2 = 0.565 (GeV/ c 2 data have also been taken with θ e = 35° and at q 2 = 1.0 and 1.5 (GeV/ c ) 2 with θ e = 86°. Electron-proton as well as electron-neutron scattering cross sections have been deduced by the ratio method. The theoretical uncertainties of this procedure are shown to be small by comparison of the bound with the free proton cross sections. The magnetic form factor of the neutron G M n derived from the data is consistent with the scaling law. The charge form factor of the neutron is found to be small.

14 data tables

Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).

Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).

Axis error includes +- 2.1/2.1 contribution (NORMALISATION ERROR).

More…

Backward electron-deuteron scattering below 280 mev

Ganichot, D. ; Grossetete, B. ; Isabelle, D.B. ;
Nucl.Phys.A 178 (1972) 545-562, 1972.
Inspire Record 75366 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.8775

We measured the elastic and inelastic scattering of electrons on deuterium at 180° for four incident energies (70, 140, 210 and 280 MeV). The data were analysed with a technique allowing an accurate comparison between experiment and theory. We observed a good agreement for the inelastic data with the expected cross section, using the presently available models and nucleon form factors. The experimental elastic cross section is systematically larger than the predicted cross sections.

16 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…